DOCSLIB.ORG

Background Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Background Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment Our ref: EEN18041.003 Level 2, 27-31 Troode Street West Perth WA 6005 T +61 8 9211 1111 Date: 04 June 2019 Tanya McColgan Bellevue Gold Limited Suite 3, Level 3, 24 Outram Street WEST PERTH WA 6008 Dear Tanya, Flora and vegetation values identified within PoW 79431 In response to your request for the preliminary results of the detailed flora and vegetation assessment undertaken over the Bellevue Gold Project area, RPS Australia West Pty Ltd (RPS) herein provides a summary of the key results and outcomes of the assessment in lieu of the final report which is due in July. Background Bellevue Gold Ltd (Bellevue Gold) is currently undertaking an exploration drilling program within mining tenement M3625 for the Bellevue Gold Project (the Project). The Project is located in the north-eastern Goldfields; approximately 40 km north of the township of Leinster in the Shire of Leonora. The Project is situated on and surrounded by pastoral lands and is located on Yakabindie cattle station. RPS was commissioned by Bellevue Gold to undertake a detailed flora and vegetation assessment over M3625 and part of M3624 to encompass the area where exploration drilling is currently underway and including the potential mining and associated infrastructure footprint (the proposed development area). The survey area, the proposed development area and the PoW 79431 area are shown in Figure A. RPS understands that the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) and the Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) have requested additional information regarding the natural values of the PoW area, where in-fill drilling is proposed, in order to adequately assess the PoW application. Detailed flora and vegetation assessment All the plant identifications have been completed and so we have a comprehensive flora inventory for the survey area based on collections carried out over three separate surveys (August 2018, October 2018 and March 2019). Additionally, the multivariate statistical analyses of the floristic data have also been completed and the vegetation community types defined and described for the survey area, the mapping however, has not yet been completed but is in progress. The objectives of this detailed flora and vegetation survey were to: 1. Identify and characterise the flora and vegetation within the survey area, via provision of a comprehensive flora inventory and vegetation unit and condition mapping. RPS Australia West Pty Ltd. Registered in Australia No. 42 107 962 872 rpsgroup.com Page 1 Our ref: EEN18041.003 2. Identify the presence and extent of conservation significant flora and ecological communities that are currently listed under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (BC Act) and the Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) within the survey area. 3. Describe the flora and vegetation values present or likely to be present within the survey area that may be directly or indirectly impacted by the Bellevue project, including an analysis of the significance of flora and vegetation in local, regional and state contexts. 4. Map the location and extent of conservation significant flora and vegetation within the survey area The scopes of work undertaken for this assessment included: 1. a detailed flora and vegetation survey; and 2. targeted searches for threatened and priority flora known to occur in the vicinity at the appropriate time (the documented peak flowering time). Survey methods The detailed flora and vegetation assessment was undertaken in accordance with Technical Guidance: Flora and Vegetation Surveys for Environmental Impact Assessment (EPA 2016) and is consistent with the regional study undertaken by Meissner and Wright (2010). The survey was coordinated and conducted by RPS Senior Botanist Caroline Gill under Licence to Collect Flora for Scientific or Other Prescribed Purposes No. SL012440. Caroline was accompanied in the field by experienced consultant botanists Kelli McCreery and Brian Morgan, and RPS graduate botanist Julijanna Hantzis. The survey was undertaken over a total of twenty days in August 2018, October 2018 March 2019. The survey methods and sampling quadrat sizes used were based on the requirements for detailed flora and vegetation surveys in the Murchison bioregion as outlined in EPA (2016). The survey was undertaken at the ‘optimal time’ for the botanical province as determined by the EPA (2016). The field survey aimed to sample the full range of flora and vegetation within the survey area by strategically locating the floristic sites (quadrats and relevés) to cover the full toposequence of floristic communities present; from hillcrests, ridges and hill slopes, to pediments, plains, drainage lines and the margins of the saline playa. A total of fifty-one 20 m x 20 m permanent quadrats and eighteen relevés were established and sampled in intact mature vegetation in areas of best condition (i.e. an effort was made to avoid areas obviously disturbed by weeds, grazing or historical mining activities). Each of the quadrats were sampled twice in accordance with EPA (2016) guidance. The survey area and locations of the floristic sites (quadrats and relevés) are shown in Figure A. It should be noted that twenty-seven of the floristic sites (quadrats and relevés) are located outside the proposed development area which is shown on Figure A. Multivariate analysis of the floristic data was carried out using the appropriate modules of the Primer statistical software package (Plymouth Marine Laboratory- Version 6) as outlined in Clarke and Gorley (2006). Data analyses included Classification and Similarity Profile Analysis (SIMPROF). The analyses aimed to: 1. Compare the floristic composition of the quadrats sampled for the survey area to identify groups of floristically similar sites and therefore define the different floristic communities present. 2. Compare the floristic composition of the quadrats sampled for the current survey to the floristic composition of communities defined by Meissner and Wright (2010) in their regional survey of the Perseverance Greenstone Belt. RPS Australia West Pty Ltd. Registered in Australia No. 42 107 962 872 rpsgroup.com Page 2 Our ref: EEN18041.003 Results Flora A total of 316 vascular flora taxa were recorded for the survey area of which 306 (96.8 %) are native species and 10 (3.2 %) are naturalised alien (weed) species. The list of taxa recorded for the survey area is presented in Appendix A. The high number of species recorded for the surveys indicate a good survey effort. For context, between 2000 and 2011 Mattiske Consulting recorded a total of 192 species over a much larger area, in the vicinity of, and incorporating part of the current survey area. The current survey therefore recorded 65 % more species than were recorded for the four Mattiske surveys. The total taxa recorded represent 48 families and 119 genera. The families represented by the greatest number of taxa are: Chenopodiaceae (61 taxa); Poaceae (38 taxa); Fabaceae (38 taxa); Malvaceae (25 taxa); Asteraceae (24 taxa); Scrophulariaceae (15 taxa); Zygophyllaceae (12 taxa); and Amaranthaceae (11 taxa). The genera represented by the greatest number of taxa are: Acacia (18 taxa); Maireana (18 taxa); Eremophila (15 taxa); Senna (14 taxa); Sclerolaena (12 taxa); Sida (11 taxa); Ptilotus (11 taxa); Eragrostis (10 taxa); and Tecticornia (10. taxa). It should be noted that the PoW area is represented by five vegetation units for which a total of 189 taxa were recorded. The complete flora inventory (316 species) is presented as Appendix A; the 189 species that occur in the vicinity of the proposed drilling are highlighted in red. Conservation significant flora No Threatened Flora (TF) species listed under the BC Act or the EPBC Act were recorded within the survey area. One Priority Flora (PF) species listed by the DBCA was recorded within the survey area; Grevillea inconspicua (Priority 4). This species is known to occur on creek lines and drainage lines on rocky outcrops, hills and ridges (WAH 2019) and, within the survey area, is associated with two stony hill vegetation units: H5; and H7. Vegetation unit H7 is present across the low stony hills and plains in the northern half of the PoW area however, despite thorough searches of this vegetation within the PoW area during the surveys the species was not recorded. As is evident from the aerial imagery much of the PoW area has been severely altered by a long history of mining and will be mapped for the survey report as Degraded or Completely Degraded. The locations of G. inconspicua records within the survey area, and in relation to the PoW area are presented in Figure B. Vegetation A total of nineteen vegetation units were described and mapped for the survey area. These units covered the full toposequence of vegetation types from hillcrests and slopes, to pediments, plains, drainage lines and salt lake margins throughout the survey area. The vegetation units were defined from the fifty-one floristic quadrats and eighteen relevés. The vegetation community mapping was conducted using a combination of aerial photo-interpretation, contour data, on- ground confirmation, vegetation structure data, and multivariate analysis of the floristic data. The hierarchical cluster analysis of the quadrat and relevé data (using modules of PRIMER v6) determined there to be eighteen statistically significant groups of sites based on their floristics. These groups are denoted by the black lines in the dendrogram
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acacia Caesaneura Maslin & J.E.Reid
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia caesaneura Maslin & J.E.Reid Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin See illustration. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com See illustration. See illustration. See illustration. Acacia caesaneura occurrence map. O ccurrence map generated via Atlas of Living Australia (https://w w w .ala.org.au). Common Name Western Blue Mulga Family Fabaceae Distribution Endemic in W.A. with most collections from an area bounded approximately by Yalgoo, Meekatharra, Lorna Glen Stn (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Square Kilometre Array Ecological Assessment Commercial-In-Confidence
    AECOM SKA Ecological Assessment A Square Kilometre Array Ecological Assessment Commercial-in-Confidence Appendix A Conservation Categories G:\60327857 - SKA EcologicalSurvey\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\Ecological Assessment\60327857-SKA Ecological Report_Rev0.docx Revision 0 – 28-Nov-2014 Prepared for – Department of Industry – ABN: 74 599 608 295 AECOM SKA Ecological Assessment A-1 Square Kilometre Array Ecological Assessment Commercial-in-Confidence Appendix A Conservation Categories G:\60327857 - SKA EcologicalSurvey\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\Ecological Assessment\60327857-SKA Ecological Report_Rev0.docx Revision 0 – 28-Nov-2014 Prepared for – Department of Industry – ABN: 74 599 608 295 Definitions of Threatened and Priority Flora Species 1 Appendix A – Conservation Categories 1.1 Western Australia Plants and animals that are considered threatened and need to be specially protected because they are under identifiable threat of extinction are listed under the Wildlife Conservation Act (WC Act). These categories are defined in Table 1. Any species identified as Threatened under the WC Act is assigned a threat category using the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List categories and criteria. Species that have not yet been adequately surveyed to warrant being listed under Schedule 1 or 2 are added to the Priority Flora or Fauna Lists under Priority 1, 2 or 3. Species that are adequately known, are rare but not threatened, or meet criteria for Near Threatened, or that have been recently removed from the threatened list for other than taxonomic reasons, are placed in Priority 4 and require regular monitoring. Conservation Dependent species and ecological communities are placed in Priority 5.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Attachments-Yaringa Quarry
    List of Attachments-Yaringa Quarry The following are a list of attachments associated with the Yaringa Works Approval – Attachment 1-Yaringa Quarry Vertices co-ordinates – Attachment 2-Yaringa Quarry Proposed Premises Map – Attachment 3A-Yaringa Quarry Estimated road building production program – Attachment 3B-Yaringa Clearing Area – Attachment 3-Key Plant and Equipment Nov 2016 – Attachment 3-Process Flowchart – Attachment 3-Proposed layout of machinery on site (approximate may change depending on site requirements and conditions) – Attachment 3-Yaringa Stockpile Layout Plan – Attachment 7-Nearest sensitive receiver from project area – Attachment 7-Siting and location Yaringa Quarry – Attachment 7-Yaringa Quarry Proximity to Hamelin Pool and Shark Bay – Attachment 10-Fee Calculator Outputs – Attachment 11-Yaringa Quarry PEIA and EMP – Biological Survey Page 1 of 1 Vertices Longitude Latitude 0 114.31174 -25.9992 1 114.31171 -25.9996 2 114.30988 -25.9995 3 114.30854 -25.9994 4 114.30905 -25.9983 5 114.31068 -26.0005 6 114.31068 -26.0025 7 114.30816 -26.0024 8 114.30814 -26.0002 9 114.30866 -26.0016 10 114.30932 -26.0016 11 114.3093 -26.002 12 114.30869 -26.0019 13 114.31456 -25.9999 14 114.31539 -26.0008 15 114.31516 -26.0009 16 114.31469 -26.0006 17 114.3144 -26.0003 18 114.31409 -26.0001 19 114.31384 -26.0011 20 114.31349 -26.0011 21 114.31216 -25.9998 22 114.31432 -25.9987 23 114.31541 -25.9983 24 114.31723 -25.9988 25 114.31651 -26.0004 26 114.30813 -26.0002 27 114.31724 -26.0007 28 114.31656 -26.0008 29 114.31579 -26.0012 30 114.31539
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling the Market: Incentives for Biodiversity in the Rangelands
    Enabling the Market: Incentives for Biodiversity in the Rangelands: Report to the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources by the Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre Anita Smyth Anthea Coggan Famiza Yunus Russell Gorddard Stuart Whitten Jocelyn Davies Nic Gambold Jo Maloney Rodney Edwards Rob Brandle Mike Fleming John Read June 2007 Copyright and Disclaimers © Commonwealth of Australia 2007 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Contributing author information Anita Smyth: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Anthea Coggan: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Famiza Yunus: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Russell Gorddard: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Stuart Whitten: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Jocelyn Davies: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Nic Gambold: Central Land Council Jo Maloney Rodney Edwards: Ngaanyatjarra Council Rob Brandle: South Austalia Department for Environment and Heritage Mike Fleming: South Australia Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation John Read: BHP Billiton Desert Knowledge CRC Report Number 18 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source.
    [Show full text]
  • Clearing Permit Decision Report
    Clearing Permit Decision Report 1. Application details 1.1. Permit application details Permit application No.: 6760/1 Permit type: Purpose Permit 1.2. Proponent details Proponent’s name: HBJ Minerals Pty Ltd 1.3. Property details Property: Mining Lease 25/357 Local Government Area: City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder Colloquial name: Cannon Gold Project 1.4. Application Clearing Area (ha) No. Trees Method of Clearing For the purpose of: 40 Mechanical Removal Mineral Exploration, Mineral Production and Associated Activities 1.5. Decision on application Decision on Permit Application: Grant Decision Date: 12 November 2015 2. Site Information 2.1. Existing environment and information 2.1.1. Description of the native vegetation under application Vegetation Description Beard vegetation associations have been mapped for the whole of Western Australia. One Beard vegetation association has been mapped within the application area (GIS Database): Beard vegetation association 468: Medium woodland, salmon gum and goldfields blackbutt. A level one flora and vegetation study incorporating a desktop assessment and a field component was undertaken in August 2015 by Botanica Consulting (2015). This survey identified ten broad vegetation types within the study area: Eucalypt Woodland CLP-EW1: Low woodland of Eucalyptus salmonophloia over heath of Eremophila scoparia and dwarf scrub of Atriplex vesicaria / Sclerolaena diacantha; CLP-EW2: Forest of Eucalyptus lesouefii over low scrub of Eremophila scoparia and dwarf scrub of Cratystylis conocephala ; CLP-EW3: Low
    [Show full text]
  • Austin Land System Unit Landform Soil Vegetation Area (%) 1
    Pages 186-237 2/12/08 11:26 AM Page 195 Austin land system Unit Landform Soil Vegetation area (%) 1. 5% Low ridges and rises – low ridges of Shallow red earths and Scattered (10-20% PFC) shrublands outcropping granite, quartz or greenstone shallow duplex soils on or woodlands usually dominated by and low rises, up to 800 m long and granite or greenstone Acacia aneura (mulga) (SIMS). 2-25 m high, and short footslopes with (4b, 5c, 7a, 7b). abundant mantles of cobbles and pebbles. 2. 80% Saline stony plains – gently undulating Shallow duplex soils on Very scattered to scattered (2.5- plains extending up to 3 km, commonly greenstone (7b). 20% PFC) Maireana spp. low with mantles of abundant to very abundant shrublands (SBMS), Maireana quartz or ironstone pebbles. species include M. pyramidata (sago bush), M. glomerifolia (ball- leaf bluebush), M. georgei (George’s bluebush) and M. triptera (three- winged bluebush). 3. 10% Stony plains – gently undulating plains Shallow red earths on Very scattered to scattered (2.5- within or above unit 2; quartz and granite granite (5c). 20% PFC) low shrublands (SGRS). pebble mantles and occasional granite outcrop. 4. <1% Drainage foci – small discrete Red clays of variable depth Moderately close to close (20-50% (10-50 m in diameter) depositional zones, on hardpan or parent rock PFC) acacia woodland or tall occurring sparsely within units 2 and 5. (9a, 9b). shrubland; dominant species are A. aneura and A. tetragonophylla (curara) (GRMU). 5. 5% Drainage lines – very gently inclined Deep red earths (6a). Very scattered (2.5-10% PFC) A linear drainage tracts, mostly unchannelled aneura low woodland or tall but occasionally incised with rills, gutters shrubland (HPMS) or scattered and shallow gullies; variable mantles of Maireana spp.
    [Show full text]
  • JABG25P097 Barker
    JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia © 2012 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 25 (2011) 97–103 © 2012 Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Govt of South Australia Name changes associated with the South Australian census of vascular plants for the calendar year 2011 R.M. Barker & P.J. Lang and the staff and associates of the State Herbarium of South Australia State Herbarium of South Australia, DENR Science Resource Centre, P.O. Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Keywords: Census, plant list, new species, introductions, weeds, native species, nomenclature, taxonomy. The following tables show the changes, and the phrase names in Eremophila, Spergularia, Caladenia reasons why they were made, in the census of South and Thelymitra being formalised, e.g. Eremophila sp. Australian vascular plants for the calendar year 2011. Fallax (D.E.Symon 12311) was the informal phrase The census is maintained in a database by the State name for the now formally published Eremophila fallax Herbarium of South Australia and projected on the Chinnock.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Mulganeura Maslin & J.E.Reid
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia mulganeura Maslin & J.E.Reid Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver.
    [Show full text]
  • Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012
    Main Roads Western Australia Report for Material Source Area: Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012 This Report: has been prepared by GHD for Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) and may only be used and relied on by MRWA for the purpose agreed between GHD and MRWA as set out in section 1.3 of this Report. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than MRWA arising in connection with this Report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this Report were limited to those specifically detailed in the Report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the Report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the Report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this Report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the Report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this Report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect. GHD has prepared this Report on the basis of information provided by MRWA and others who provided information to GHD (including Government authorities), which GHD has not independently verified or checked beyond the agreed scope of work. GHD does not accept liability in connection with such unverified information, including errors and omissions in the Report which were caused by errors or omissions in that information.” The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on information obtained from, and testing undertaken at or in connection with, specific sample points.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Vegetation Assessment Part 7.Pdf
    0 2km Scale 1:125 000 MGA94 (Zone 51) dgn ~ Imagery: Landgte (2011) LEGEND Species of Interest Study Area Disturbance Footprint Mount Keith Satellite Wanjarri Nature Reserve Tenements (G. Cockerton & P. Goodman WB38116) Surface Water Author: Western Botanical Date: December 2017 Drawn: CAD Resources ~ Tel 9246 3242 URL www.cadresources.com.au December 2017 A4 Rev: B Ref g2414_R02_04_SOI_OX. Addendum to Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Mt Keith Satellite Study Area, March 2017 Appendix 4: Vegetation Community Descriptions and Quadrat Data BHP Billiton, Nickel West Pty Ltd Report Ref: WB867 WB867 Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Mt Keith Satellite Operations Study Area June 2017 Appendix 4a: Vegetation Community Descriptions for the Mt Keith Satellite (MKS) Study Area. Addendum to Western Botanical (2017) Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Mt Keith Satellite Proposal Study Area March 2017. Consultants report to BHP Billiton, Nickel West. Report reference WB867. a 1 WB867 Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Mt Keith Satellite Study Area June 2017 Appendix 4 Contents Definitions ............................................................................................................... 3 Appendix 4a. Vegetation Community Descriptions .............................................. 5 Appendix 4b. Quadrat & Releve Site Summaries ................................................. 43 2 a WB867 Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Mt Keith Satellite Operations Study Area June 2017 Definitions Sclerophyll Shrublands are those which are dominated or characterised by plants with hard, drought tolerant, non-succulent foliage. They include common genera such as Acacia, Senna, Sida and Eremophila varieties that make up the bulk of the flora and vegetation of the Yakabindie tenements. These species are generally not salt tolerant, however may demonstrate tolerances to a wide variety of soil types with corresponding range of inferred geochemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vegetation and Flora Survey of the Brockman Syncline 4 Project Area, Near Tom Price
    AA VVeeggeettaattiioonn aanndd FFlloorraa SSuurrvveeyy ooff tthhee BBrroocckkmmaann SSyynncclliinnee 44 PPrroojjeecctt AArreeaa,, nneeaarr TToomm PPrriiccee Prepared for Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd Prepared by JJuulllyy 22000055 Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd A Vegetation and Flora Survey of the Brockman Syncline 4 Project Area, near Tom Price © Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2005 ABN 49 092 687 119 14 View Street North Perth Western Australia 6006 Ph: (08) 9328 1900 Fax: (08) 9328 6138 Project No.: 271 Prepared by: Michi Maier Checked by: Garth Humphreys This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified on the cover page and no representation is made to any third party. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd. Cube:Current:271 (Brockman 4 Biological):Doc:flora:flora_survey_7.doc 2 A Vegetation and Flora Survey of the Brockman Syncline 4 Project Area, near Tom Price A Vegetation and Flora Survey of the Brockman Syncline 4 Project Area, near Tom Price Contents 1.0 Summary 6 1.1 Background 6 1.2 Vegetation 6 1.3 Flora 7 1.4 Management Recommendations 7 2.0 Introduction 9 2.1 Background to the BS4 Project and Location of the Project Area 9 2.2 Scope and Objectives of this Study 9 2.3 Purpose of this Report 12 2.4 Existing Environment 12 3.0 Methodology 18 3.1 Desktop
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materialsupplementary Material
    Supplementary Materials 10.1071/RJ16076_AC © CSIRO 2017 Supplementary Material: Rangeland Journal, 2017, 39(1), 85–95. Assessing the invasion threat of non-native plant species in protected areas using Herbarium specimen and ecological survey data. A case study in two rangeland bioregions in Queensland Michael R. NgugiA,B and Victor John NeldnerA AQueensland Herbarium, Department of Science Information Technology and Innovation, Mt Coot- tha Road, Toowong, Qld 4066, Australia. BCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1. List of native species in Cape York Peninsula and Desert Uplands bioregions Cape York Peninsula native Species Desert Uplands native Species Abelmoschus ficulneus Abelmoschus ficulneus Abelmoschus moschatus subsp. Tuberosus Abildgaardia ovata Abildgaardia ovata Abildgaardia vaginata Abildgaardia vaginata Abutilon arenarium Abrodictyum brassii Abutilon calliphyllum Abrodictyum obscurum Abutilon fraseri Abroma molle Abutilon hannii Abrophyllum ornans Abutilon leucopetalum Abrus precatorius L. subsp. precatorius Abutilon malvifolium Abutilon albescens Abutilon nobile Domin Abutilon auritum Abutilon otocarpum Abutilon micropetalum Abutilon oxycarpum Acacia armillata Abutilon oxycarpum Acacia armitii Abutilon oxycarpum var. incanum Acacia aulacocarpa Abutilon oxycarpum var. subsagittatum Acacia auriculiformis Acacia acradenia Acacia brassii Acacia adsurgens Acacia calyculata Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth. var. aneura Acacia celsa Acacia aneura var. major Pedley Acacia chisholmii Acacia angusta Maiden
    [Show full text]