DOCSLIB.ORG

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE July 15, 1997

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE July 15, 1997 July 15, 1997 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE H5213 punishment and rehabilitation targeted to get- (e) MALAYSIA.ÐThe Secretary of the Navy Mr. GILMAN. Mr. Speaker, this legis- ting young people back on track to productive is authorized to transfer to the Government lation provides for the transfer by sale lives. of Malaysia the ``NEWPORT'' class tank of certain surplus naval vessels. It landing ship BARBOUR COUNTY (LST 1195). would authorize the transfer of 14 ves- Again, I rise in strong support of this bill and (f) MEXICO.ÐThe Secretary of the Navy is I urge my colleagues to support this valuable authorized to transfer to the Government of sels, in all, to 8 countries: Brazil, Chile, piece of crime legislation. Mexico the ``KNOX'' class frigate ROARK Egypt, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, Thai- The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. CAL- (FF 1053). land, and Taiwan. VERT). The question is on the motion (g) TAIWAN.ÐThe Secretary of the Navy is This legislation was approved unani- offered by the gentleman from Califor- authorized to transfer to the Taipei Eco- mously by our Committee on Inter- nomic and Cultural Representative Office in nia [Mr. RIGGS] that the House suspend national Relations on June 25. the United States (which is the Taiwan in- I would like to underscore that none the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 1818, as strumentality designated pursuant to sec- amended. of these proposed transfers is a grant. tion 10(a) of the Taiwan Relations Act) the As a result of these sales, our Treasury The question was taken. ``KNOX'' class frigates WHIPPLE (FF 1062) Mr. RIGGS. Mr. Speaker, on that I and DOWNES (FF1070). will be receiving $162.6 million. These demand the yeas and nays. (h) THAILAND.ÐThe Secretary of the Navy 14 ships involve 5 classes: 7 Knox class The yeas and nays were ordered. is authorized to transfer to the Government frigates, 3 Newport class tank landing The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- of Thailand the ``NEWPORT'' class tank ships, 2 Perry class guided missile frig- landing ship SCHENECTADY (LST 1185). ant to clause 5 of rule I and the Chair's ates, 1 Hunley class submarine tender (i) FORM OF TRANSFERS.ÐEach transfer au- and 1 Kaiser class oiler. prior announcement, further proceed- thorized by this section shall be on a sales ings on this motion will be postponed. It is important to note that our Navy basis under section 21 of the Arms Export expects that by proceeding with these f Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2761; relating to the foreign military sales program). sales, our Nation will realize an addi- GENERAL LEAVE SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING tional $195 million for training, for sup- Mr. RIGGS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unan- TRANSFER OF NAVAL VESSELS AND plies, for support, and for repair serv- INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ices. imous consent that all Members may WITH THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL- I would also like to note to my col- have 5 legislative days within which to IPPINES leagues that the proposed legislation revise and extend their remarks on (a) FINDINGS.ÐThe Congress makes the fol- lowing findings: includes language similar to that in- H.R. 1818. cluded in prior ship transfer legislation The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there (1) The United States and the Republic of the Philippines have a long tradition of requiring the Secretary of the Navy to objection to the request of the gen- international cooperation and mutual sup- the maximum extent feasible to re- tleman from California? port. quire that any repair or reactivation There was no objection. (2) The United States strongly desires to work be done in the United States in f continue mutual cooperation as a partner in matters of international security and sci- our own shipyards. It is my under- GENERAL LEAVE entific research. standing from the Navy that each of (3) The President and the Department of the recipient countries have agreed to Mr. RIGGS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unan- Defense possess assets which can contribute that proviso with respect to these pro- imous consent that all Members may positively to international security and sci- posed transfers. have 5 legislative days within which to entific research. Finally, I understand that our Navy revise and extend their remarks on the (b) SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.ÐIt is the sense strongly supports the transfer of these of the Congress that the President should Senate bill, S. 768. vessels to advance the valuable cooper- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there use the authority under section 21 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2761) to ative relationships that we have devel- objection to the request of the gen- oped with each of these nation's navies. tleman from California? transfer on a sales basis, subject to vessel availability, to the Republic of the Phil- Accordingly, I urge my colleagues to There was no objection. ippines, not more than one ``STALWART'' or support this legislation. f ``VICTORIOUS'' class ocean surveillance Mr. HAMILTON. Mr. Speaker, I yield ship (T±AGOS). AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF myself such time as I may consume. SEC. 3. COSTS OF TRANSFERS. NAVAL VESSELS Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. Any expense of the United States in con- 2035. I want to extend my commenda- Mr. GILMAN. Mr. Speaker, I move to nection with a transfer authorized by this tion and congratulations to the chair- Act shall be charged to the recipient. suspend the rules and pass the bill man for bringing what I consider to be SEC. 4. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY. (H.R. 2035) to authorize the transfer of an excellent bill before the House. naval vessels to certain foreign coun- The authority granted by section 1 shall expire at the end of the 2-year period begin- b 1315 tries, as amended. ning on the date of the enactment of this The Clerk read as follows: Act. I believe because of the gentleman's H.R. 2035 SEC. 5. REPAIR AND REFURBISHMENT OF VES- leadership and the work of the Com- Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Rep- SELS IN UNITED STATES SHIPYARDS. mittee on International Relations the resentatives of the United States of America in The Secretary of the Navy shall require, to Congress, over a period of months, has Congress assembled, the maximum extent possible, as a condition been able to effect an important of a transfer of a vessel under this Act, that SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER NAVAL change in ship transfer policy. VESSELS. the country to which the vessel is trans- Now the clear emphasis, as the gen- ferred have such repair or refurbishment of (a) BRAZIL.ÐThe Secretary of the Navy is tleman from New York has said, in the vessel as is needed, before the vessel authorized to transfer to the Government of joins the naval forces of that country, per- U.S. policy today is on the sale of Brazil the ``HUNLEY'' class submarine ten- formed at a shipyard located in the United naval vessels instead of grants. All 14 der HOLLAND (AS 32). States, including a United States Navy ship- naval vessels in this package are sales, (b) CHILE.ÐThe Secretary of the Navy is yard. and the bill will result in $162.6 million authorized to transfer to the Government of Chile the ``KAISER'' class oiler ISHERWOOD The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. in revenues to the United States Treas- (T±AO 191). PETRI). Pursuant to the rule, the gen- ury. The United States Navy will also (c) EGYPT.ÐThe Secretary of the Navy is tleman from New York [Mr. GILMAN] save money not spent on storage or authorized to transfer to the Government of and the gentleman from Indiana [Mr. scrapping costs. Work in the U.S. ship- Egypt the ``KNOX'' class frigates PAUL (FF HAMILTON] each will control 20 min- yards prior to ship transfer will result 1080), MILLER (FF 1091), JESSE L. BROWN utes. in an additional $190 million in con- (FFT 1089), and MOINESTER (FFT 1097), and The Chair recognizes the gentleman tracts for American workers. Now this the ``OLIVER HAZARD PERRY'' class frig- package also benefits U.S. foreign pol- ates FAHRION (FFG 22) and LEWIS B. from New York [Mr. GILMAN]. PULLER (FFG 23). Mr. GILMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield icy and U.S. defense policy through en- (d) ISRAEL.ÐThe Secretary of the Navy is myself such time as I may consume. hanced navy-to-navy ties and improved authorized to transfer to the Government of (Mr. GILMAN asked and was given interoperability. Israel the ``NEWPORT'' class tank landing permission to revise and extend his re- So, Mr. Speaker, I think the bill has ship PEORIA (LST 1183). marks.) positive benefits for the United States.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress
    Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress (name redacted) Specialist in Naval Affairs December 13, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RS22478 Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Summary Names for Navy ships traditionally have been chosen and announced by the Secretary of the Navy, under the direction of the President and in accordance with rules prescribed by Congress. Rules for giving certain types of names to certain types of Navy ships have evolved over time. There have been exceptions to the Navy’s ship-naming rules, particularly for the purpose of naming a ship for a person when the rule for that type of ship would have called for it to be named for something else. Some observers have perceived a breakdown in, or corruption of, the rules for naming Navy ships. On July 13, 2012, the Navy submitted to Congress a 73-page report on the Navy’s policies and practices for naming ships. For ship types now being procured for the Navy, or recently procured for the Navy, naming rules can be summarized as follows: The first Ohio replacement ballistic missile submarine (SBNX) has been named Columbia in honor of the District of Columbia, but the Navy has not stated what the naming rule for these ships will be. Virginia (SSN-774) class attack submarines are being named for states. Aircraft carriers are generally named for past U.S. Presidents. Of the past 14, 10 were named for past U.S. Presidents, and 2 for Members of Congress. Destroyers are being named for deceased members of the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, including Secretaries of the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the annual rate of Navy ship procurement, the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans, and the capacity of the U.S. shipbuilding industry to execute the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) have been working since 2019 to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. The new goal is expected to introduce a new, more distributed fleet architecture featuring a smaller proportion of larger ships, a larger proportion of smaller ships, and a new third tier of large unmanned vehicles (UVs). On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the 355-ship force-level goal. The document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 manned ships and 77 to 140 large UVs. A September 2021 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the fleet envisioned in the document would cost an average of between $25.3 billion and $32.7 billion per year in constant FY2021 dollars to procure.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Hull Classification Codes
    Ship Hull Classification Codes Warships USS Constitution, Maine, and Texas MSO Minesweeper, Ocean AKA Attack Cargo Ship MSS Minesweeper, Special (Device) APA Attack Transport PC Patrol Coastal APD High Speed Transport PCE Patrol Escort BB Battleship PCG Patrol Chaser Missile CA Gun Cruiser PCH Patrol Craft (Hydrofoil) CC Command Ship PF Patrol Frigate CG Guided Missile Cruiser PG Patrol Combatant CGN Guided Missile Cruiser (Nuclear Propulsion) PGG Patrol Gunboat (Missile) CL Light Cruiser PGH Patrol Gunboat (Hydrofoil) CLG Guided Missile Light Cruiser PHM Patrol Combatant Missile (Hydrofoil) CV Multipurpose Aircraft Carrier PTF Fast Patrol Craft CVA Attack Aircraft Carrier SS Submarine CVE Escort Aircraft Carrier SSAG Auxiliary Submarine CVHE Escort Helicopter Aircraft Carrier SSBN Ballistic Missile Submarine (Nuclear Powered) CVL Light Carrier SSG Guided Missile Submarine CVN Multipurpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear Propulsion) SSN Submarine (Nuclear Powered) CVS ASW Support Aircraft Carrier DD Destroyer DDG Guided Missile Destroyer DE Escort Ship DER Radar Picket Escort Ship DL Frigate EDDG Self Defense Test Ship FF Frigate FFG Guided Missile Frigate FFR Radar Picket Frigate FFT Frigate (Reserve Training) IX Unclassified Miscellaneous LCC Amphibious Command Ship LFR Inshore Fire Support Ship LHA Amphibious Assault Ship (General Purpose) LHD Amphibious Assault Ship (Multi-purpose) LKA Amphibious Cargo Ship LPA Amphibious Transport LPD Amphibious Transport Dock LPH Amphibious Assault Ship (Helicopter) LPR Amphibious Transport, Small LPSS Amphibious Transport Submarine LSD Dock Landing Ship LSM Medium Landing Ship LST Tank Landing Ship MCM Mine Countermeasure Ship MCS Mine Countermeasure Support Ship MHC Mine Hunter, Coastal MMD Mine Layer, Fast MSC Minesweeper, Coastal (Nonmagnetic) MSCO Minesweeper, Coastal (Old) MSF Minesweeper, Fleet Steel Hulled 10/17/03 Copyright (C) 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue #909 December 1992
    A sub overview 1 il Acting Secretary of the Navy Sean O’Keefe Chief of Naval Operations ADM Frank B. KelsoII Chief of Information RADM Kendell Pease CO Navy Internal Relations Activity CAPT Jolene Keefer X0 Navy Internal Relations Activity MAGAZINE OF THE U.S. NAVY LCDR Pamela A. Moulder Director, Print Media Division DECEMBER 1992 - NUMBER 909 ENS Barbara Burfeind 70TH YEAR OF PUBLICATION A//Hands Editor Marie G. Johnston A//Hands Assistant Editor JOCS Robert C. Rucker A//Hands Staff 502 Jonathan Annis JO1 Sherri E. Bashore J02(AW) Laurie Beers JOP(SW) Jim Conner PH1 (AW) Joseph Dorey J03 Angela L. Jenkins JO1 Steve Orr Patricia Swift J02 Paul Taylor Production Director Michael David Tuffli Production Associates William E. Beamon DM1 Steven J. Eversole Leroy E. Jewel1 DM3 Keith Wilson NI RA Staff Distribution:Garland Powell, RM1 Ken Mumford; Plans and Policy: LCDR Rob Raine, J.D. Leipold; Budget: Betty Williams;ADP: JoeBartlett; Editorial: JanKemp Brandon, Catherine Bird; Administration: SKI Jeff Bryan, Life on an SSBN - Page 37 SaundraGray and YN3 Michelle Schaefer. All Hands (USPS 372-970; ISSN 0002- . From the sea From under the sea 5577)(Number 909) is published monthly by Navy Internal Relations 6 Subsmove to 21century st photoA gallery 22 Activity: NavalStation Anacostia, Bldg. 168, 2701 S. Capitol St., S.W., Gray ladies of the sea On the hunt Washington, D.C. 203744077, Sec- 8 History of thesilent service Lifeon 32 a fastattack ond-class postage paid at Washing- ton, D.C. 20374. A “father’s’’ legacy Deep, dark secrets Subscriptions: Superintendent of Doc- uments, US.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Voyages of the USS Canopus
    AN ACCOUNT OF THE LAST VOYAGES OF THE U.S.S. CANOPUS by Captain Earl L. Sackett, Commanding Officer of Canopus during the Bataan Campaign. [email protected] 12 May 1943 Captain E.L. Sackett, U.S. Navy, commanding officer of the U.S.S. CANOPUS as the time of the capitulation of Manila, Philippine Islands, has written an account of the exploits of that ship. Believing that the relatives of officers and men of the CANOPUS would like to have this account, Captain Sackett has requested that it be reproduced and sent to the families of his shipmates. Accordingly, I am enclosing a copy of this account for you. I know you will find strength and pride in the knowledge that the gallant fight waged by the officers and men of the CANOPUS against great odds was in keeping with the finest traditions of the Navy. I regret that I have no further information about individual members of the crew. Please be assured, however, that any news received by the Department relative to them will be promptly sent to you. Very truly yours, C.C. Baughman, Captain, U.S. Navy CHAPTER I A less likely candidate than the Canopus for the roll of heroine in a tale of adventure could hardly be imagined. She was no longer young, and had never been particularly dashing, but her partisans were always ready to ascribe a certain majesty of her appearance. Undeniable, she waddled like a duck, as was pointed out in many a good- natured jibe, but that was only natural in a middle-aged motherly type, and she was truly "mama-san" to her brood of submarines, which used to forage with her from the Philippines to the China coast and back again each year.
    [Show full text]
  • PLRD-81-59 Improved Management of Fleet Supplies and Spare Parts
    lrbp~~esmailed to :a single address. ~mwt be prepaid dn o e;arh, check, ~gl(lr basis. Ch@ck’ahould be made ““$uperintsndent of Dcwuments”‘. COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITLO STATES WASHINOTON D.C. 2UW B-204010 TO the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives This report points out that, acting on prior General Accounting Office recommendations, the Navy has improved its management of shipboard supplies, but further im- provements are needed. Further improvements can be made without adversely affecting readiness of the fleet. We are sending copies of this report to the Director, Office of Management and Budget; the Secretary of Defense; and the Secretary of the Navy. of the United States , i i COMPTROLLER GENERAL'S IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF FLEET REPORT TO THE CONGRESS SUPPLIES AND SPARE PARTS CAN SAVE MILLIONS WITHOUT AFFECTING READINESS -w-w--DIGEST Prior GAO reviews on the Navy's supply support for submarines, aircraft carriers, and non- automated combat surface ships disclosed large excesses of spare parts and supplies on some ships which were not available when needed to fill shortages of other ships. Also, substan- tial investments were made for unneeded parts and supplies, while other critically needed items were in short supply. GAO concluded that future investments in stocks for those ships could be reduced substantially and recom- mended specific actions to achieve the reduc- tions. GAO made this review to assess actions taken by the Navy in response to GAO's earlier reports on shipboard supply management and to evaluate the effectiveness of supply support provided by the Navy's automated surface ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • USN Ship Designations
    USN Ship Designations By Guy Derdall and Tony DiGiulian Updated 17 September 2010 Nomenclature History Warships in the United States Navy were first designated and numbered in system originating in 1895. Under this system, ships were designated as "Battleship X", "Cruiser X", "Destroyer X", "Torpedo Boat X" and so forth where X was the series hull number as authorized by the US Congress. These designations were usually abbreviated as "B-1", "C-1", "D-1", "TB-1," etc. This system became cumbersome by 1920, as many new ship types had been developed during World War I that needed new categories assigned, especially in the Auxiliary ship area. On 17 July 1920, Acting Secretary of the Navy Robert E. Coontz approved a standardized system of alpha-numeric symbols to identify ship types such that all ships were now designated with a two letter code and a hull number, with the first letter being the ship type and the second letter being the sub-type. For example, the destroyer tender USS Melville, first commissioned as "Destroyer Tender No. 2" in 1915, was now re-designated as "AD-2" with the "A" standing for Auxiliary, the "D" for Destroyer (Tender) and the "2" meaning the second ship in that series. Ship types that did not have a subclassification simply repeated the first letter. So, Battleships became "BB-X" and Destroyers became "DD-X" with X being the same number as previously assigned. Ships that changed classifications were given new hull numbers within their new designation series. The designation "USS" standing for "United States Ship" was adopted in 1907.
    [Show full text]
  • Crew Rotation in the Navy: the Long-Term Effect on Forward Presence Pub
    CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE A CBO PAPER OCTOBER 2007 Crew Rotation in the Navy: The Long-Term Effect on Forward Presence Pub. No. 2897 A CBO PAPER Crew Rotation in the Navy: The Long-Term Effect on Forward Presence October 2007 The Congress of the United States O Congressional Budget Office Note The cover shows the Spruance class destroyer U.S.S. Fletcher in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, near the end of the Navy’s first Sea Swap experiment in 2004. During that experiment, the Fletcher remained deployed overseas for two years while a total of four crews rotated to it at six-month intervals. (Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 2nd Class Dennis C. Cantrell) Preface The Navy today deploys most of its ships with single crews. Thus, when a ship goes on deployment, the crew that takes it out of port is the same crew that brings it back, normally six months later. For some ships, however, the Navy employs a variety of dual-crew or multi- crew concepts to increase the amount of time that those ships can spend on-station in their operating areas overseas. In some cases, such as with ballistic missile submarines, crew rotation means that two crews alternate taking a single ship out for relatively short deployments from its home port (usually for less than three months). In other cases, three or more crews succes- sively rotate to a ship while it is deployed overseas so the ship can stay on-station for longer periods and thus provide more “forward presence.” In the past few years, the Navy has experi- mented with the latter approach by rotating crews to large surface combatants in order to increase the amount of forward presence they provide.
    [Show full text]
  • USNS Shoshone
    NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT VESSEL: USS Sperry (AS-12) USS Sperry underway date unknown . U.S. Navy photograph. Vessel History The Mare Island Navy Shipyard in Vallejo, California (renamed Mare Island Naval Shipyard after 1945), laid the keel of the submarine tender Sperry (AS-12) on February 1, 1941 and launched the ship on December 17, 1941, just 10 days after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Sperry was named after the famed engineer and inventor, Elmer A. Sperry. Sperry’s daughter, Mrs. Helen Sperry Lea, sponsored the ship at its launching ceremony. Captain Robert H. Smith took command of Sperry when the U.S. Navy commissioned the vessel on May 1, 1942. After completing its trials and training, Sperry sailed for Oahu, Territory of Hawaii, on August 2, 1942. While in Oahu, it repaired eight submarines over the course of three months before leaving on its next assignment. In October, Sperry headed for Australia arriving there on October 26, 1942. It took a circuitous route around the Solomon Islands to Noumea, New Caledonia where it spent three days on a layover. It arrived in Brisbane, Australia on November 13 and spent the next two months there repairing eight submarines. It sailed out on January 17, 1943 and returned to Pearl Harbor, arriving there on January 31. Sperry remained in Pearl Harbor for the next four months and conducted repairs on 20 submarines before setting sail on June 8, 1943 for Midway Island with a small contingent of ships. 2 Sperry arrived at Midway on June 12 and spent the following five months restoring submarines there.
    [Show full text]
  • Victor Krygowski Transcript Summary 1
    Victor Krygowski Transcript Summary Vic Krygowski Transcript Summary [0:00:00] entering military service [0:03:38] training for Navy service and submarine school [0:08:25] assignment to a submarine tender – USS Beaver [0:11:41] leaving for Scotland aboard the USS Beaver in a convoy of ships, attack by a German U-boat wolf pack, conversion of the USS Beaver from a pleasure craft to a submarine tender, purpose for going to Scotland [0:14:40] submarine squadron 50, participation in the war in North Africa, the USS Beaver in Great Britain [0:16:13] assignment to lookout on the bridge, torpedo hit on a ship carrying fuel, watching men burn and die on the ship, trying to rescue several men from the water, thoughts about seeing the horrible tragedy, hospitality of Scottish people, setting up the officer’s club in Rosneath [0:21:42] submarine duty on Attu, trip from Scotland to Attu, crossing the 180th parallel three times [0:23:57] description of USS Beaver and deficiencies in the ship for military service, switching from deck officer to the engine room, working as an engineer on a steam driven engine, making coffee on a high pressure steam line [0:27:07] Scotland, duration of trip from Scotland to the Aleutians, men returning from liberty on Attu with Japanese guns and ammunition, Japanese corpses on Attu [0:30:48] knowledge of battle of Attu, Japanese bomb Attu while men watch a movie [0:32:09] service to S type submarines, primitive nature of S type submarines, assignment to Devilfish submarine [0:35:00] submarine missions in the Aleutians,
    [Show full text]
  • Although This Small Submarine Tender Became One of the Most Decorated
    Although this small submarine tender became one of The Pigeon along with her sister gunboats formed a the most decorated warships of WWII, the exploits of the strong defensive line against the various Chinese factions USS Pigeon (ASR-6) were overshadowed by the dramatic during the 1920s/1930s. events of the fall of Bataan and America’s decimated Asian Fleet. BY A.B. FEUER ong before World War II, “Spittin’ Dick” of the Submarine Salvage Vessel Pigeon, a minesweeper Finch. Since the Yangtze patrol craft carriers off Pearl Harbor. A Japanese task Hawes, the Navy’s foremost tobacco chewer, converted minesweeper. craft were built solely for river work, the Pigeon force had sailed two days previously for Lwas already legend among submariners. During the month of November 1941, Japanese and Finch were assigned as escort vessels. The the Hawaiian Islands. Richard E. Hawes joined the US Navy in 1917 warships were continually sighted at various flotilla immediately set a course for Manila. The Japanese destroyers finally as an ordinary seaman, and within eight years locations in the Pacific. The Chief of Naval The following morning, west of Formosa, a tired of playing a cat-and-mouse game had achieved the rank of Master Diver. In 1925, he Operations, Adm. Harold R. Stark, sent an Japanese seaplane circled the formation, and a with the gunboat flotilla and turned was awarded the Navy Cross for his heroic efforts urgent dispatch to Adm. Thomas Hart, short time later the American ships were away from their mock attack exer- while attempting to rescue 33 men trapped in the commander of the US Asia- tic Fleet.
    [Show full text]