Directed Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Into Haematopoietic and Definitive Endodermal Lineages

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Directed Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Into Haematopoietic and Definitive Endodermal Lineages DIRECTED DIFFERENTIATION OF HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS INTO HAEMATOPOIETIC AND DEFINITIVE ENDODERMAL LINEAGES ABRAHAM SUMAN MARY (M.Sc MICROBIOLOGY, UNIV. OF MUMBAI, INDIA) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF BIOCHEMISTRY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In all things I give YOU glory! You have always led me through amazing paths and given me gifts that I don’t deserve. I thank you Lord for all the blessings you constantly shower on me. Everything is possible with God! I thank Dr. Alan Colman for being my guide and helping me to initiate the work contained in this dissertation. His support and encouragement have been invaluable. Thank you, Alan for your support through the years. Dr. Norris Ray Dunn took me under his wing and guided me through this endeavour. He has been a true mentor, always willing to teach, and I have learned a lot from him. Ray, thank you for showing me the way and helping me reach this juncture. A significant part of the research was conducted at ES Cell International Pte Ltd to whom I would like to express my sincere gratitude. Triona, Jacqui, Robert, Michael, Bruce, Chirag, Suzan and so many others have played important roles and encouraged me at all times. Critical portions of this work were done at the Institute of Medical Biology, A*Star. I would like to register my appreciation for the support and help provided by many people in IMB especially, members of the Ray Dunn lab, Mike Jones lab and Alan Colman lab. Kee Yew, thank you for giving me your precious time and helping me with some of the most important data in this dissertation. I would like to thank the staff at the Department of Biochemistry and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine at the National University of Singapore for providing administrative support. Through the years many colleagues and friends have expressed their concern, spoken encouraging words and pushed me to get to the finish. I thank you all. Varsha, Akila, Raj, Suzan and Thava, Chaaya, Ajith and Surinder– you have seen my struggles, listened to my problems and never hesitated to help. Thank you. My teachers through the years have influenced me in so many fantastic ways. I remember you all and thank God that you were in my life. Ms. Susan, Mrs. Chinnamma Kovoor, Mrs. Phadnis, Mrs. Shantini Nair, Mrs. Vaidya, Mrs. V.P.Kale and George– thank you. None of this would have been possible but for the support system my family has been. Thank you, Appa and Mummy for all the love and laughter and for inspiring me to follow my heart. Sumitha, Aji and Tamanna, and Susan, thank you for the joy you bring to my life and my world. Pappa and Mamma, thank you for your love and unconditional support. My grandparents and the rest of my extended family have been encouraging me whole-heartedly and I sincerely thank all of them. Ajit, you are my strength and joy. You have been waiting patiently, working so hard not to distract me and making me smile even when things were tough. Thank you for being by my side, egging me on and never losing faith in me. You’re simply the best! i TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary…………………………………………………………………………..….v List of tables………………………………………………………………………....vii List of figures…………………………………………………………………….....viii List of symbols………………………………………………………………………..x Chapter 1: General Introduction 1.1. Embryonic stem cells..............................................................................................1 1.2. Gastrulation– formation of mesoderm and endoderm in the embryo.....................8 1.3. Regenerative medicine and embryonic stem cells................................................10 1.3.1. Diabetes– a candidate disease for cell therapy .........................................10 1.3.2. Transplantation tolerance of hESC-derived cell therapy ..........................10 1.4. Haematopoiesis.....................................................................................................18 1.4.1. Haematopietic development in the mouse..................................................18 1.4.2. Haematopoiesis in the human embryo.......................................................25 1.4.3. Haematopoietic differentiation from mESCs.............................................26 1.4.4. Haematopoietic differentiation from hESCs..............................................29 1.5. Definitive endoderm formation in the vertebrate embryo ....................................34 1.5.1. Differentiation of mESCs to endodermal derivatives ................................40 1.5.2. Endodermal differentiation from hESCs....................................................45 Chapter 2: Materials and Methods 2.1. Cell culture............................................................................................................52 2.1.1. Human embryonic stem cell culture ..........................................................52 2.1.2. Stromal feeder cells....................................................................................53 2.2. Differentiation protocols.......................................................................................53 2.2.1. Haematopoietic differentiation: Co-culture with stromal cell lines..........53 2.2.2. Haematopoietic differentiation: Use of cytokines......................................54 2.2.3. Endodermal differentiation: 3D Matrigel protocol ...................................55 2.3. CFU assay .............................................................................................................57 2.4. Flow Cytometry ....................................................................................................58 2.5. Immunocytochemistry ..........................................................................................58 2.6. Differential staining ..............................................................................................59 ii 2.7. RNA extraction .....................................................................................................60 2.8. Quantitative RT-PCR............................................................................................61 2.9. Western blotting....................................................................................................61 2.10. Microarray...........................................................................................................63 2.11. Whole Mount In Situ Hybridisation (WISH)......................................................63 2.11.1. Cloning of genes ......................................................................................63 2.11.2. Riboprobe synthesis .................................................................................64 2.11.3 Whole-mount In Situ Hybridisation (WISH).............................................65 Chapter 3: Haematopoietic Differentiation Introduction.………………………………………………………………………….67 Results………………………………………………………………………………..70 3.1. hESC-derived embryoid bodies (EBs) give rise to haematopoietic-like cells when co-cultured with stromal cell lines………………………………………..70 3.2. hESCs form haematopoietic-like cells when differentiated in presence of pro- haematopoietic- cytokines ....................................................................................76 3.3. hESCs maintained on human feeder cells are amenable to haematopoietic differentiation........................................................................................................80 3.3.1. hESCs maintained on CCD919 cells .........................................................82 3.3.2. hESCs maintained on Ortec143 cells ........................................................85 Conclusion and Discussion…………………………...…….......………………........92 Chapter 4: Endodermal Differentiation Introduction.………………………………………………………………………….96 Results………………………………………………………………………………..98 4.1. Formation of definitive endoderm within embryoid bodies derived from hESCs ……………………………………………………………………………98 4.1.1. Bmp4 enhances the endoderm-inducing potential of Activin A in Matrigel.......................................................................................................99 4.1.2. Matrigel affects the extent, not the outcome of differentiation ................102 4.1.3. Cells expressing FOXA2 and SOX17 are of definitive endodermal origin as visceral endoderm is suppressed during differentiation .....................107 4.2. Detailed analysis of the role played by Bmp4 in the formation of definitive iii endoderm in vitro...............................................................................................110 4.2.1. Activin A signaling leads to the expression of known target genes during differentiation............................................................................................112 4.2.3. Bmp4 signaling and its downstream effects.............................................118 4.2.4. Bmp4 does not generate cell types associated with its pleiotropic activities ............................................................................................................................123 4.2.5. No evidence of formation of alternate lineages during DE differentiation ............................................................................................................................128 4.2.6. Gene Expression Analysis of Differentiation Using Microarray Technology................................................................................................131 Conclusion and Discussion…………………………………………………………153 Chapter 5– Future Direction Introduction...……………………………………………………………………….159
Recommended publications
  • Acetyl Group Coordinated Progression Through the Catalytic Cycle of an Arylalkylamine N-Acetyltransferase
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Acetyl group coordinated progression through the catalytic cycle of an arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase Adam A. Aboalroub, Ashleigh B. Bachman, Ziming Zhang, Dimitra Keramisanou, David J. Merkler, Ioannis Gelis* Department of Chemistry, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 The transfer of an acetyl group from acetyl-CoA to an acceptor amine is a ubiquitous bio- chemical transformation catalyzed by Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferases (GNATs). Although it is established that the reaction proceeds through a sequential ordered mecha- nism, the role of the acetyl group in driving the ordered formation of binary and ternary com- OPEN ACCESS plexes remains elusive. Herein, we show that CoA and acetyl-CoA alter the conformation of the substrate binding site of an arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT) to facilitate Citation: Aboalroub AA, Bachman AB, Zhang Z, Keramisanou D, Merkler DJ, Gelis I (2017) Acetyl interaction with acceptor substrates. However, it is the presence of the acetyl group within group coordinated progression through the the catalytic funnel that triggers high affinity binding. Acetyl group occupancy is relayed catalytic cycle of an arylalkylamine N- through a conserved salt bridge between the P-loop and the acceptor binding site, and is acetyltransferase. PLoS ONE 12(5): e0177270. manifested as differential dynamics in the CoA and acetyl-CoA-bound states. The capacity https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177270 of the acetyl group carried by an acceptor to promote its tight binding even in the absence of Editor: Viswanathan V. Krishnan, California State CoA, but also its mutually exclusive position to the acetyl group of acetyl-CoA underscore its University Fresno, UNITED STATES importance in coordinating the progression of the catalytic cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials: Evaluation of Cytotoxicity and Α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity of Amide and Polyamino-Derivatives of Lupane Triterpenoids
    Supplementary Materials: Evaluation of cytotoxicity and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of amide and polyamino-derivatives of lupane triterpenoids Oxana B. Kazakova1*, Gul'nara V. Giniyatullina1, Akhat G. Mustafin1, Denis A. Babkov2, Elena V. Sokolova2, Alexander A. Spasov2* 1Ufa Institute of Chemistry of the Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 71, pr. Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russian Federation 2Scientific Center for Innovative Drugs, Volgograd State Medical University, Novorossiyskaya st. 39, Volgograd 400087, Russian Federation Correspondence Prof. Dr. Oxana B. Kazakova Ufa Institute of Chemistry of the Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences 71 Prospeсt Oktyabrya Ufa, 450054 Russian Federation E-mail: [email protected] Prof. Dr. Alexander A. Spasov Scientific Center for Innovative Drugs of the Volgograd State Medical University 39 Novorossiyskaya st. Volgograd, 400087 Russian Federation E-mail: [email protected] Figure S1. 1H and 13C of compound 2. H NH N H O H O H 2 2 Figure S2. 1H and 13C of compound 4. NH2 O H O H CH3 O O H H3C O H 4 3 Figure S3. Anticancer screening data of compound 2 at single dose assay 4 Figure S4. Anticancer screening data of compound 7 at single dose assay 5 Figure S5. Anticancer screening data of compound 8 at single dose assay 6 Figure S6. Anticancer screening data of compound 9 at single dose assay 7 Figure S7. Anticancer screening data of compound 12 at single dose assay 8 Figure S8. Anticancer screening data of compound 13 at single dose assay 9 Figure S9. Anticancer screening data of compound 14 at single dose assay 10 Figure S10.
    [Show full text]
  • The Title of the Article
    Mechanism-Anchored Profiling Derived from Epigenetic Networks Predicts Outcome in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Xinan Yang, PhD1, Yong Huang, MD1, James L Chen, MD1, Jianming Xie, MSc2, Xiao Sun, PhD2, Yves A Lussier, MD1,3,4§ 1Center for Biomedical Informatics and Section of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA 2State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Southeast University, 210096 Nanjing, P.R.China 3The University of Chicago Cancer Research Center, and The Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA 4The Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, and the Computational Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA §Corresponding author Email addresses: XY: [email protected] YH: [email protected] JC: [email protected] JX: [email protected] XS: [email protected] YL: [email protected] - 1 - Abstract Background Current outcome predictors based on “molecular profiling” rely on gene lists selected without consideration for their molecular mechanisms. This study was designed to demonstrate that we could learn about genes related to a specific mechanism and further use this knowledge to predict outcome in patients – a paradigm shift towards accurate “mechanism-anchored profiling”. We propose a novel algorithm, PGnet, which predicts a tripartite mechanism-anchored network associated to epigenetic regulation consisting of phenotypes, genes and mechanisms. Genes termed as GEMs in this network meet all of the following criteria: (i) they are co-expressed with genes known to be involved in the biological mechanism of interest, (ii) they are also differentially expressed between distinct phenotypes relevant to the study, and (iii) as a biomodule, genes correlate with both the mechanism and the phenotype.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Diagnostic Performance of a Small RNA Within the PCA3 and BMCC1 Gene Locus That Potentially Targets Mrna
    Published OnlineFirst November 12, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0377 Research Article Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers Identification and Diagnostic Performance of a & Prevention Small RNA within the PCA3 and BMCC1 Gene Locus That Potentially Targets mRNA Ross M. Drayton1, Ishtiaq Rehman1, Raymond Clarke2, Zhongming Zhao3,4, Karl Pang1, Saiful Miah1, Robert Stoehr5, Arndt Hartmann5, Sheila Blizard1, Martin Lavin2, Helen E. Bryant1, Elena S. Martens-Uzunova6, Guido Jenster6, Freddie C. Hamdy7, Robert A. Gardiner2, and James W.F. Catto1 Abstract Background: PCA3 is a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) with malignant prostatic tissues, exfoliated urinary cells from men unknown function, upregulated in prostate cancer. LncRNAs may with prostate cancer (13–273 fold change; t test P < 0.003), and be processed into smaller active species. We hypothesized this for closely correlated to PCA3 expression (r ¼ 0.84–0.93; P < 0.001). PCA3. Urinary PCA3-shRNA2 (C-index, 0.75–0.81) and PCA3 (C-index, Methods: We computed feasible RNA hairpins within the 0.78) could predict the presence of cancer in most men. PCA3- BMCC1 gene (encompassing PCA3) and searched a prostate shRNA2 knockup altered the expression of predicted target transcriptome for these. We measured expression using qRT- mRNAs, including COPS2, SOX11, WDR48, TEAD1, and Noggin. PCR in three cohorts of prostate cancer tissues (n ¼ 60), PCA3-shRNA2 expression was negatively correlated with COPS2 exfoliated urinary cells (n ¼ 484 with cancer and n ¼ 166 in patient samples (r ¼0.32; P < 0.001). controls), and in cell lines (n ¼ 22). We used in silico predictions Conclusion: We identified a short RNA within PCA3, whose and RNA knockup to identify potential mRNA targets of short expression is correlated to PCA3, which may target mRNAs transcribed RNAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Novel Pathways That Promote Anoikis Through Genome-Wide Screens
    University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS GSBS Dissertations and Theses Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences 2016-10-14 Identification of Novel Pathways that Promote Anoikis through Genome-wide Screens Victoria E. Pedanou University of Massachusetts Medical School Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss Part of the Biology Commons, and the Cancer Biology Commons Repository Citation Pedanou VE. (2016). Identification of Novel Pathways that Promote Anoikis through Genome-wide Screens. GSBS Dissertations and Theses. https://doi.org/10.13028/M27G6D. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss/889 This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in GSBS Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i TITLE PAGE IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL PATHWAYS THAT PROMOTE ANOIKIS THROUGH GENOME-WIDE SCREENS A Dissertation Presented By VICTORIA ELIZABETH PEDANOU Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Massachusetts Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Worcester in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY OCTOBER 14TH, 2016 CANCER BIOLOGY ii SIGNATURE PAGE IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL PATHWAYS THAT PROMOTE ANOIKIS THROUGH GENOME-WIDE SCREENS A Dissertation Presented By VICTORIA ELIZABETH PEDANOU This work was undertaken in the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Cancer Biology The signature of the Thesis Advisor signifies validation of Dissertation content ___________________________ Michael R. Green, Thesis Advisor The signatures of the Dissertation Defense Committee signify completion and approval as to style and content of the Dissertation __________________________________ Eric H.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Table S1
    Entrez Gene Symbol Gene Name Affymetrix EST Glomchip SAGE Stanford Literature HPA confirmed Gene ID Profiling profiling Profiling Profiling array profiling confirmed 1 2 A2M alpha-2-macroglobulin 0 0 0 1 0 2 10347 ABCA7 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 7 1 0 0 0 0 3 10350 ABCA9 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 9 1 0 0 0 0 4 10057 ABCC5 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 5 1 0 0 0 0 5 10060 ABCC9 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 9 1 0 0 0 0 6 79575 ABHD8 abhydrolase domain containing 8 1 0 0 0 0 7 51225 ABI3 ABI gene family, member 3 1 0 1 0 0 8 29 ABR active BCR-related gene 1 0 0 0 0 9 25841 ABTB2 ankyrin repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 2 1 0 1 0 0 10 30 ACAA1 acetyl-Coenzyme A acyltransferase 1 (peroxisomal 3-oxoacyl-Coenzyme A thiol 0 1 0 0 0 11 43 ACHE acetylcholinesterase (Yt blood group) 1 0 0 0 0 12 58 ACTA1 actin, alpha 1, skeletal muscle 0 1 0 0 0 13 60 ACTB actin, beta 01000 1 14 71 ACTG1 actin, gamma 1 0 1 0 0 0 15 81 ACTN4 actinin, alpha 4 0 0 1 1 1 10700177 16 10096 ACTR3 ARP3 actin-related protein 3 homolog (yeast) 0 1 0 0 0 17 94 ACVRL1 activin A receptor type II-like 1 1 0 1 0 0 18 8038 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 1 0 0 0 0 19 8751 ADAM15 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 (metargidin) 1 0 0 0 0 20 8728 ADAM19 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19 (meltrin beta) 1 0 0 0 0 21 81792 ADAMTS12 ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 12 1 0 0 0 0 22 9507 ADAMTS4 ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1
    [Show full text]
  • ZNF226 Is Over-Expressed in Brain Metastatic Breast Cancer-PDF 111920
    1 ZNF226 is over-expressed in brain metastatic breast cancer. 2 Shahan Mamoor East Islip, NY USA1 3 [email protected] 4 5 Metastasis to the brain is a clinical problem in patients with breast cancer1-3. We mined published 6 microarray data4,5 to compare primary and metastatic tumor transcriptomes to discover genes associated with brain metastasis in patients with metastatic breast cancer. We found that the zinc finger protein 226, 7 encoded by ZNF226 was among the genes whose expression was most different in the brain metastases of patients with brain metastatic breast cancer as compared to primary tumors of the breast. ZNF226 may be 8 relevant to processes underlying metastasis of primary tumor-derived cancer cells to the brain in humans 9 with metastatic breast cancer. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Keywords: breast cancer, brain metastases, central nervous system metastases, ZNF226, systems biology 26 of breast cancer, targeted therapeutics in breast cancer. 27 28 PAGE 1 1 One report described a 34% incidence of central nervous system metastases in trastuzumab- treated patients with breast cancer2. This alarmingly high frequency of CNS metastasis events demands 2 an enhanced understanding of the transcriptional makeup of brain metastatic tissues to support identification of therapeutic targets, whether they are treatment related or not. We performed a global 3 comparative analysis of primary and metastatic tumors in patients with brain metastatic breast cancer4,5. 4 We discovered significant differential and increased expression of ZNF226 in brain metastatic tissues of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    PROBING THE INTERACTION OF ASPERGILLUS FUMIGATUS CONIDIA AND HUMAN AIRWAY EPITHELIAL CELLS BY TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILING IN BOTH SPECIES by POL GOMEZ B.Sc., The University of British Columbia, 2002 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Experimental Medicine) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) January 2010 © Pol Gomez, 2010 ABSTRACT The cells of the airway epithelium play critical roles in host defense to inhaled irritants, and in asthma pathogenesis. These cells are constantly exposed to environmental factors, including the conidia of the ubiquitous mould Aspergillus fumigatus, which are small enough to reach the alveoli. A. fumigatus is associated with a spectrum of diseases ranging from asthma and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis to aspergilloma and invasive aspergillosis. Airway epithelial cells have been shown to internalize A. fumigatus conidia in vitro, but the implications of this process for pathogenesis remain unclear. We have developed a cell culture model for this interaction using the human bronchial epithelium cell line 16HBE and a transgenic A. fumigatus strain expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP). Immunofluorescent staining and nystatin protection assays indicated that cells internalized upwards of 50% of bound conidia. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), cells directly interacting with conidia and cells not associated with any conidia were sorted into separate samples, with an overall accuracy of 75%. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling using microarrays revealed significant responses of 16HBE cells and conidia to each other. Significant changes in gene expression were identified between cells and conidia incubated alone versus together, as well as between GFP positive and negative sorted cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Leigh Syndrome: One Disorder, More Than 75 Monogenic Causes
    Title: Leigh Syndrome: One disorder, more than 75 monogenic causes Running head: Leigh Syndrome: One disorder, many genes Author list: Nicole J. Lake, MSc,1,2 Alison G. Compton, PhD,1,2 Shamima Rahman, MD, PhD,3 and David R. Thorburn, PhD1,2,4 Affiliations: From the 1Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 2Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 3Mitochondrial Research Group, Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Institute of Child Health, University College London and Metabolic Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 4Victorian Clinical Genetic Services, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Corresponding author: Prof. David Thorburn Email [email protected] Telephone +61 3 8341 6235 Fax +61 3 8341 6212 Address Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children’s Hospital, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia Number of characters in the title and running head: 51 and 35, respectively Number of words in the abstract (107), and the body of manuscript not including abstract (4877) Number of figures (3), colour figures (1/3), and tables (3) 1 Abstract Leigh syndrome is the most common pediatric presentation of mitochondrial disease. This neurodegenerative disorder is genetically heterogeneous, and to date pathogenic mutations in more than 75 genes have been identified, encoded by two genomes (mitochondrial and nuclear). More than a third of these disease genes have been characterized in the last 5 years alone, reflecting the significant advances made in understanding its etiological basis. We review the diverse biochemical and genetic etiology of Leigh syndrome and associated clinical, neuroradiological and metabolic features that can provide clues for diagnosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptome-Wide Profiling of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Transcriptome-wide Profling of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations Patients Reveal Important Long noncoding RNA molecular signatures Santhilal Subhash 2,8, Norman Kalmbach3, Florian Wegner4, Susanne Petri4, Torsten Glomb5, Oliver Dittrich-Breiholz5, Caiquan Huang1, Kiran Kumar Bali6, Wolfram S. Kunz7, Amir Samii1, Helmut Bertalanfy1, Chandrasekhar Kanduri2* & Souvik Kar1,8* Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are low-fow vascular malformations in the brain associated with recurrent hemorrhage and seizures. The current treatment of CCMs relies solely on surgical intervention. Henceforth, alternative non-invasive therapies are urgently needed to help prevent subsequent hemorrhagic episodes. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) belong to the class of non-coding RNAs and are known to regulate gene transcription and involved in chromatin remodeling via various mechanism. Despite accumulating evidence demonstrating the role of lncRNAs in cerebrovascular disorders, their identifcation in CCMs pathology remains unknown. The objective of the current study was to identify lncRNAs associated with CCMs pathogenesis using patient cohorts having 10 CCM patients and 4 controls from brain. Executing next generation sequencing, we performed whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis and identifed 1,967 lncRNAs and 4,928 protein coding genes (PCGs) to be diferentially expressed in CCMs patients. Among these, we selected top 6 diferentially expressed lncRNAs each having signifcant correlative expression with more than 100 diferentially expressed PCGs. The diferential expression status of the top lncRNAs, SMIM25 and LBX2-AS1 in CCMs was further confrmed by qRT-PCR analysis. Additionally, gene set enrichment analysis of correlated PCGs revealed critical pathways related to vascular signaling and important biological processes relevant to CCMs pathophysiology.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Underlying Hub Genes and Molexular Pathogensis in Gastric Cancer by Integrated Bioinformatic Analyses
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.20.423656; this version posted December 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Investigation of the underlying hub genes and molexular pathogensis in gastric cancer by integrated bioinformatic analyses Basavaraj Vastrad1, Chanabasayya Vastrad*2 1. Department of Biochemistry, Basaveshwar College of Pharmacy, Gadag, Karnataka 582103, India. 2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001, Karanataka, India. * Chanabasayya Vastrad [email protected] Ph: +919480073398 Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001 , Karanataka, India bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.20.423656; this version posted December 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract The high mortality rate of gastric cancer (GC) is in part due to the absence of initial disclosure of its biomarkers. The recognition of important genes associated in GC is therefore recommended to advance clinical prognosis, diagnosis and and treatment outcomes. The current investigation used the microarray dataset GSE113255 RNA seq data from the Gene Expression Omnibus database to diagnose differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Pathway and gene ontology enrichment analyses were performed, and a proteinprotein interaction network, modules, target genes - miRNA regulatory network and target genes - TF regulatory network were constructed and analyzed. Finally, validation of hub genes was performed. The 1008 DEGs identified consisted of 505 up regulated genes and 503 down regulated genes.
    [Show full text]