London Plan Annual Monitoring Report 2015/16 July 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

London Plan Annual Monitoring Report 2015/16 July 2017 Strategy Title SUBTITLE London Plan Annual Monitoring Report 2015/16 JULY 2017 Date COPYRIGHT CONTENTS Table 1.1 - Main contents Greater London Authority Executive Summary 1 July 2017 Chapter 1 - Introduction 9 Published by Greater London Authority Chapter 2 - Performance Against Key Performance Indicator Targets City Hall 15 The Queen’s Walk Key Performance Indicator 1 16 More London Key Performance Indicator 2 19 London SE1 2AA Key Performance Indicator 3 21 Key Performance Indicator 4 24 www.london.gov.uk Key Performance Indicator 5 29 Enquiries 020 7983 4100 Key Performance Indicator 6 34 Minicom 020 7983 4458 Key Performance Indicator 7 35 Key Performance Indicator 8 36 Key Performance Indicator 9 41 All data from the London Development Database (LDD) except where stated. Key Performance Indicator 10 43 Key Performance Indicator 11 44 Crown Copyright all rights reserved. GLA 10032216 (2017) Key Performance Indicator 12 46 Front cover photo: Eleanor Ward/GLA Key Performance Indicator 13 49 Key Performance Indicator 14 50 Key Performance Indicator 15 52 Key Performance Indicator 16 54 Copies of this document are available from http://www.london.gov.uk Key Performance Indicator 17 57 Key Performance Indicator 18 59 Key Performance Indicator 19 61 Key Performance Indicator 20 63 Key Performance Indicator 21 66 Key Performance Indicator 22 69 Key Performance Indicator 23 70 Key Performance Indicator 24 72 IV LONDON PLAN AMR 13 LONDON PLAN AMR 13 V Chapter 3 - Additional Perfomance Measures and Statistics 75 Housing and Design 76 Housing Provision Annual Monitor 2015/16 76 FIGURES AND MAPS Affordable Housing Delivery Monitor 135 Figure 2.1 - Affordable Housing - Three Year Average Performance by Borough 32 Local Affordable Housing Policies 138 Figure 2.2 - Office Starts and Year-end Permissions in Central London, 1985-2016 38 Achieving an Inclusive Environment 146 Figure 2.3 - Co2 Emissions 68 Environment and Transport 151 Map 3.1 - Total Housing Delivery 2015/16 94 Planning 162 Map 3.2 - Total Housing Delivery as a Percentage of London Plan Housing Monitoring Benchmarks 98 Figure 3.1 - Total Housing Provision By Year 100 Chapter 4 - Other Contextual Data Sources 181 Map 3.3 - Net affordable housing delivery by tenure 110 Map 3.4 - Affordable Housing Delivery as a Percentage of Net Conventional Housing Delivery 2015/16 112 Chapter 5 - Conclusions and Looking Ahead 185 Map 3.5 - Net Conventional Housing Pipeline as at 31/03/2016 130 Figure 3.2 - Affordable housing delivery in London 1991/92 - 2015/16 136 Map 3.6 - London Public Transport Access (PTAL) Map 2015 152 VI LONDON PLAN AMR 13 Executive Summary 2 LONDON PLAN AMR 13 LONDON PLAN AMR 13 3 i. This Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) provides information about progress • Objective 6 – KPIs 1,13,14,15,16,17 being made in implementing the policies and addressing the objectives v. 17 KPI targets are met or heading in the right direction. For KPI 3 (open of the London Plan by showing how London is performing against 24 Key space), KPI 9 (industrial land release) and KPI 14 (car traffic growth) Performance Indicator s (KPIs) identified in Chapter 8 of the Plan. Although a negative has changed to a positive performance. KPI 19 (waste this is the 13th AMR published by the Mayor, it is the first one that monitors management) and KPI 24 (heritage assets) have turned from a positive to a the 2015 London Plan using the slightly modified set of KPI targets mixed trend. Four KPI targets, however, have not been met or are heading introduced through that Plan. the wrong way. For KPI 18 (Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation) a ii. Chapter 2 provides greater detail on each of the 24 KPIs, and Table 1 positive has turned to a negative performance. For one KPI target (KPI 6 – life summarises progress against each of them. The KPIs are not policies; expectancy) data is no longer available. Table 1 provides an overview of the they have been chosen as yardsticks to show the direction of travel in performance of all KPIs. The performance against the individual London Plan implementing the London Plan, and the extent of change, to help monitor Objectives is summarised as follows: progress and identify areas where policy changes may need to be Objective 1- A city that meets the challenges of economic and population considered. growth iii. The London Plan sets six strategic objectives to be delivered by its detailed vi. Net provision of new affordable housing has decreased to 6,675 units, 14% policies. These are that London should be: less than in 2014/15 and over 10,000 below the London Plan affordable • Objective 1- A city that meets the challenges of economic and population housing target. In total, over 38,500 dwellings were completed in 2015/16, growth, 9% below the 2015 London Plan target. An above-target proportion of new residential developments in London have been built on previously developed • Objective 2- An internationally competitive and successful city, land in the last year, and densities within the density matrix range have fallen • Objective 3- A city of diverse, strong, secure and accessible again slightly. neighbourhoods, Objective 2 - An internationally competitive and successful city • Objective 4- A city that delights the senses, vii. At 73% London’s employment rate has continued to rise since 2009. Office • Objective 5- A city that becomes a world leader in improving the starts were lower than in 2015 but still higher than the ten year average, environment, and the office pipeline has remained above its benchmark although it has • Objective 6- A city where it is easy, safe and convenient for everyone to decreased this year. The rate of loss of industrial land was 41 ha, 4 ha above access jobs, opportunities and facilities. the monitoring benchmark. iv. Different KPIs contribute to measuring the performance of the London Plan Objective 3- A city of diverse, strong, secure and accessible against these six objectives; neighbourhoods • Objective 1 – KPIs 1,2,4,5,6,12,14 viii. The employment rate gap between the BAME and white population is • Objective 2 – KPIs 2,7,8,9,10,12,17,24 almost 1% lower than in the previous year, and lone parent income support in London has been 3% lower than in the country as a whole. Employment • Objective 3 – KPIs 2,5,10,11,12,15 in Outer London has increased by 2.4% on the previous year. The pupil/ • Objective 4 – KPIs 1,3,15,19,22,23,24 teacher ratio across London has dropped slightly, with more boroughs • Objective 5 – KPIs 1,3,18,19,20,21,22,23 seeing a fall than in the previous year. Net affordable housing completions (20% of conventional completions in 2015) have been significantly below the 4 LONDON PLAN AMR 13 LONDON PLAN AMR 13 5 numeric target with the three-year average affordable homes share down by Table 1 - KPI Performance Overview a further 4%. KPI KPI Target Comment Objective 4- A city that delights the senses 1 Maintain at least 96 per cent of + Both approvals and completions ix. The proportion of designated heritage assets at risk has generally only new residential development above target, approvals 1.3% changed slightly, but for scheduled monuments the risk has gone down by to be on previously developed above previous year 2.6%. Progress has been made against the 2020 river restoration target, land 30% of it has been achieved by the end of 2015/16. 16 ha designated open space (gross) was lost last year, just over half the amount of space lost in the 2 Over 95 per cent of - Below target, and further slight previous year. In terms of cycling, mode stages have increased by 23k. development to comply with the fall of proportion within matrix housing density location and range on previous year Objective 5- A city that becomes a world leader in improving the the density matrix environment 3 No net loss of open space + Loss at 16 ha compared to 30 ha x. Rates for waste recycling and waste going to landfill have flatlined. Average designated for protection in in the previous year carbon dioxide emission savings have exceeded the Building Regulation LDFs due to new development target. The estimated generation of renewable energy has increased by 45% 4 Average completion of a + Over 38,500 completions but is still well below target. An additional 4.5 ha of green roofs have been minimum of 42,000 net in 2015/16, 9% below 2015 installed between 2013 and 2015. There has been a gross loss of 9 ha of additional homes per year London Plan target protected habitat based on development approvals, higher than previous 5 Completion of 17,000 net - Below target; three year average year’s figure of just 2 ha. additional affordable homes per affordable homes share of net Objective 6- A city where it is easy, safe and convenient for everyone to year conventional supply down by a access jobs, opportunities and facilities further 4% on the previous year xi. Private car and public transport use both declined last year and there was a 6 Reduction in the difference in n/a ONS has stopped publishing slight decrease in the total distance travelled by road traffic across London life expectancy between those mortality data of 0.3% compared to the previous year. The proportion of B1 development living in the most and least in locations with high public transport accessibility has risen slightly and deprived areas of London (split is above the benchmark. In terms of the use of London’s waterways, both by gender) passenger and freight transport on the Thames were slightly up on the 7 Increase in the proportion of + 1.7% increase on previous year previous year.
Recommended publications
  • Arch 133, Deptford Railway Station, London
    Arch 133, Deptford Railway Station, London Location Rent Deptford in South East London has benefited from major investment £28,000 per annum exclusive. over the last few years and now has a thriving vibrant local community of creatives and professionals. Rates The listed arches are situated on the approach to Deptford Station, Rateable Value To be assessed. accessed via Deptford High Street. Rates Payable 2016/17 To be assessed. The arches share a market yard with The Deptford Project – a new mixed Interested parties are advised to make their own enquiries to Lewisham use scheme extending to 14 arches, 7 commercial units, 2 restaurants, 3 Council (020 8314 6000). town houses and 140 apartments. Specification Accommodation The arch will be handed over in shell condition with a new corrugated Ground Floor 1,038 sq ft 96.47 sq m lining and capped services – further details upon request. Total 1,038 sq ft 96.47 sq m Energy Performance Certificate To be assessed. Lease Term Costs Available on a new standard Network Rail leases – further details upon request. Each party is to be responsible for their own legal costs incurred in the transaction. Contact Tom Jamson +44 (0)20 7317 3722 [email protected] +44 (0)20 7317 3700 | www.klm-re.com Misrepresentation Act 1967 & Property Misdescription Act 1991. These Particulars are believed to be correct but their accuracy is not guaranteed, are set out as a general guide and do not constitute the whole or part of a contract. All liability, in negligence or otherwise, arising from the use of the particulars is hereby excluded.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Current and Future Cruise Ship Requirements in London
    London Development Agency June 2009 AN ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT AND FUTURE CRUISE SHIP REQUIREMENTS IN LONDON In conjunction with: 5 Market Yard Mews 194 Bermondsey Street London SE1 3TQ Tel: 020 7642 5111 Email: [email protected] CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Current cruise facilities in central London 4 3. The organisational and planning context 8 4. The cruise market and future demand 11 5. Views of cruise operators 19 6. Potential for growing cruise calls to London 22 7. Assessment of potential sites 24 8. Lessons from elsewhere 37 9. Conclusions 51 Appendices: Appendix 1: List of consultees Appendix 2: Seatrade cruise market report Appendix 3: Location plan of potential sites Appendix 4: Economic impact study Appendix 5: Overview of costs The Tourism Company – Assessment of current and future cruise ship requirements 2 1. INTRODUCTION This report was commissioned by the London Development Agency (LDA) and Greater London Authority (GLA), with support from the Port of London Authority (PLA) in response to a need for a better understanding of London’s future cruise facility requirements. This need is identified in the London Tourism Vision for 2006-2016, and associated Action Plan 2006-2009, under the theme ‘A Sustainable and Inclusive City’, one of whose objectives is to ‘Increase the profile and usage of services along the Thames’. London currently hosts a relatively small number of cruise ships each year, making use of the informal and basic mooring and passenger facilities at Tower Bridge and Greenwich. The aim of this research is to assess the extent to which the lack of a dedicated, more efficient cruise facility is discouraging operators from bringing cruise ships to London, and if there is latent demand, how might this be accommodated.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2016, London
    London Register 2016 HERITAGE AT RISK 2016 / LONDON Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Greater London 1 Barking and Dagenham 1 Barnet 2 Bexley 5 Brent 5 Bromley 6 Camden 11 City of London 20 Croydon 21 Ealing 24 Enfield 27 Greenwich 30 Hackney 34 Hammersmith and Fulham 40 Haringey 43 Harrow 47 Havering 50 Hillingdon 51 Hounslow 58 Islington 64 Kensington and Chelsea 70 Kingston upon Thames 81 Lambeth 82 Lewisham 91 London Legacy (MDC) 95 Merton 96 Newham 101 Redbridge 103 Richmond upon Thames 104 Southwark 108 Sutton 116 Tower Hamlets 117 Waltham Forest 123 Wandsworth 126 Westminster, City of 129 II London Summary 2016 he Heritage at Risk Register in London reflects the diversity of our capital’s historic environment. It includes 682 buildings and sites known to be at risk from Tneglect, decay or inappropriate development - everything from an early 18th century church designed by Nicholas Hawksmoor, to a boathouse built during WWI on an island in the Thames. These are sites that need imagination and investment. In London the scale of this challenge has grown. There are 12 more assets on the Heritage at Risk Register this year compared to 2015. We also know that it’s becoming more expensive to repair many of our buildings at risk. In the face of these challenges we’re grateful for the help and support of all those who continue to champion our historic environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambeth Overground Stations Study Contents
    Feasibility Study for New Stations and Station Improvements on the Overground in Lambeth Final Report 4.0 Monday, 07 July 2014 Prepared for: LB Lambeth Prepared by: Steer Davies Gleave 28-32 Upper Ground London, SE1 9PD +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com 2 Lambeth Overground Stations Study Contents 3 4 Contents 1. Introduction and Scope 2. Strategic Transport Context ■ The study area and related projects ■ Current travel patterns ■ Policy considerations ■ Rail demand ■ Operational considerations 3. Existing Railway Stations ■ Current demand ■ Constraints and issues ■ Opportunities 4. New Stations ■ Brixton Overground Station ■ Loughborough Overground Junction 5. Funding Opportunities ■ Sources of Funding 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ■ Potential Investment Programme 5 6 1 1 2 3 4 5 Lambeth Overground Stations Study Section 1: Introduction 7 1 1 2 3 4 5 Introduction Introduction Steer Davies Gleave was commissioned by LB Lambeth in January 2014 to undertake a feasibility study for new stations and station improvements on the London Overground services in the London Borough of Lambeth. The primary aim of the study is to assess and The primary aim of the study is: review the case for building new stations at Brixton and Loughborough Junction and consider opportunities to improve Clapham High Street and Wandsworth Road stations and the existing Brixton and Loughborough Junction stations. to develop a case for building new stations at Study Scope Brixton and Loughborough Junction; The outputs of our study were to: Set out the strategic transport context – the public transport connections to Loughborough Junction, Brixton, Clapham High Street and and Wandsworth Road and the opportunities for strategic interchange at Loughborough Junction and Brixton.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report 2011-12
    Lewisham local development framework Annual monitoring report 2011-12 December 2012 Contents Executive summary 7 1 Content 7 2 Setting the context 7 3 Assessing performance in plan making 7 4 Focussing development in the regeneration and growth areas 7 5 Assessing whether planning policies are being implemented 8 6 Assessing performance in planning application decisions 9 7 Conclusion 10 1. Introduction 11 1.1 Indicators 11 1.2 Local planning policies 11 1.3 Sources of data 12 1.4 Structure of report 12 2. Lewisham in context 13 2.1 Overview 13 2.2 What are the trends? 15 2.2.1 Population growth 15 2.2.2 Population composition 16 2.2.3 Migrants 17 2.2.4 Ethnic composition 18 2.2.5 Deprivation 18 3. Planning policy framework 20 3.1 What is the LDF? 20 3.2 Legislation and regulations 21 3.3 Lewisham’s LDS 22 3.4 LDF progress in 2011/12 22 3.4.1 Core Strategy 23 3.4.2 Site Allocations Local Plan 23 3.4.3 Lewisham Town Centre Local Plan 24 3.4.4 Development Management Local Plan 24 3.4.5 Catford Town Centre Local Plan 24 3.4.6 Supplementary planning documents 25 3.4.7 Evidence base reports 25 3.5 Impact of Localism Act and other government changes 27 3.5.1 Neighbourhood Plans and Development Orders 27 3.5.2 Community Infrastructure Levy 27 3.5.3 Duty to Co-operate 28 LDF – Annual Monitoring Report 2011-12 1 4. Regeneration and growth areas 30 4.1 Introduction 31 4.2 Deptford and New Cross 31 4.3 Lewisham Town Centre 38 4.4 Catford Town Centre 40 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment
    Lewisham local development framework Sustainability appraisal and strategic environmental assessment Site allocations proposed submission DPD March 2012 Copy for public consultation NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ......................................................................................................5 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................12 1.1 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 LEWISHAM LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK .......................................................................... 13 1.3 LEWISHAM CORE STRATEGY .......................................................................................................... 13 1.4 SITE ALLOCATIONS DPD................................................................................................................. 16 1.5 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENT FOR SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL .................................................... 19 1.6 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DIRECTIVE ............................................................. 19 1.7 PURPOSE OF SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL ..................................................................................... 22 1.8 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 23 1.9 THE HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT (HRA) PROCESS .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Core) Strategy
    LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Development Polices & Site Allocations THE PREFERRED OPTIONS REPORT May 2007 IMPORTANT INFORMATION WHAT IS THIS REPORT? If you would like to speak to the Planning Policy This is the Preferred Options Report for the Team about the report, you can telephone us Council’s Development Polices and Site on 020 8314 7400. Allocations Development Plan Document (DPD). It contains policies that will be used to HOW CAN I COMMENT? assess planning applications for new We need your feedback on what you think of development and change of use. It also the preferred options presented in this report. contains policies for specific sites and • We want to know what you think? designates certain land for a specific land use • Can improvements be made? e.g. housing, employment etc. • What do you think of the draft policies? The report provides the detailed planning Comments must be in writing and sent to: policies and builds on the Council’s vision, • Planning Policy spatial strategy and core policies contained in London Borough of Lewisham the document called People, Places and 5th Floor, Laurence House Spaces, the LDFs Spatial (Core) Strategy. At 1 Catford Road, Catford, SE6 4RU; or this stage the policies represent the Council’s • E-mail your comments to: preferred approach it is considering adopting. [email protected] with ‘LDF Development Policies & Site Allocations WHY HAS IT BEEN PREPARED? Preferred Options’ as the subject. New planning legislation required the Council to produce a new set of planning policy The consultation period for the Preferred documents. Collectively these documents are Options Report ends on Friday 3rd August 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Polices & Site Allocations
    LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Development Polices & Site Allocations THE PREFERRED OPTIONS REPORT March 2007 IMPORTANT INFORMATION WHAT IS THIS REPORT? If you would like to speak to the Planning Policy This is the Preferred Options Report for the Team about the report, you can telephone us Council’s Development Polices and Site on 020 8314 7400. Allocations Development Plan Document (DPD). It contains policies that will be used to HOW CAN I COMMENT? assess planning applications for new We need your feedback on what you think of development and change of use. It also the preferred options presented in this report. contains policies for specific sites and • We want to know what you think? designates certain land for a specific land use • Can improvements be made? e.g. housing, employment etc. • What do you think of the draft policies? The report provides the detailed planning Comments must be in writing and sent to: policies and builds on the Council’s vision, • Planning Policy spatial strategy and core policies contained in London Borough of Lewisham the document called People, Places and 5th Floor, Laurence House Spaces, the LDFs Spatial (Core) Strategy. At 1 Catford Road, Catford, SE6 4RU; or this stage the policies represent the Council’s • E-mail your comments to: preferred approach it is considering adopting. [email protected] with ‘LDF Development Policies & Site Allocations WHY HAS IT BEEN PREPARED? Preferred Options’ as the subject. New planning legislation required the Council to produce a new set of planning policy The consultation period for the Preferred documents. Collectively these documents are Options Report ends on 13th July, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • By Bellway Homes a VIBRANT NEW COLLECTION of 1, 2 & 3 BEDROOM APARTMENTS JUST 3 MINUTES DRIVE from GREENWICH
    by Bellway Homes A VIBRANT NEW COLLECTION OF 1, 2 & 3 BEDROOM APARTMENTS JUST 3 MINUTES DRIVE FROM GREENWICH Welcome to Kent Wharf, Deptford. , It ’’’’’’’’’s the place to be, one of LONDON’S newest THE 1, 2 & 3 BEDROOM APARTMENTS AT KENT WHARF OFFER STANDOUT LIVING IN AN INCREDIBLE CITY LOCATION Computed generated image. INTERIORon trend DESIGN Computed generated image. The CANARY CITY DEPTFORD STATION WHARF GREENWICH Stratford THE O2 Computed enhanced aerial image. TAKE IN picturesquebreathtaking VIEWS OF THE CAPITAL Computer generated image. Perfectly PLACED TO There are few cities in the world more captivating than London. Whether it’s catching a show in the West End, LANDMARKS ENTERTAINMENT STATIONS taking a trip on the London Eye or visiting a historic building. It’s all just waiting for you to discover it. Tower Bridge - 11 minutes The O2 - 10 minutes Greenwich - 2 minutes Kent Wharf is in an enviable position when it comes to commuting into the City. You’re a 10 The Shard - 14 minutes Westfield, Stratford - 20 minutes Canary Wharf - 17 minutes minute walk from Deptford Railway Station, from where overground journeys into London Bridge take 8 minutes, with London Cannon Street accessible in 13 minutes. London Eye - 19 minutes Shoreditch - 21 minutes Bank - 23 minutes Deptford Bridge DLR station is also a 10 minute walk from home, taking you to Canary Wharf Big Ben - 20 minutes Southbank - 21 minutes City Airport - 26 minutes in 17 minutes. International travel is a breeze, you can reach London City Airport in 26 minutes from Deptford Bridge. The City - 21 minutes The West End - 27 minutes Waterloo - 29 minutes Map not to scale and is for visual purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Deptford Market Yard Is Well Connected to Central London
    COMMERCIAL UNITS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & FLOOR PLANS DEPTFORD MARKET YARD DEPTFORD MARKET YARD HAS TRANSFORMED THE AREA ADJACENT TO DEPTFORD RAILWAY STATION INTO A NEW, VIBRANT PART OF THE TOWN CENTRE WITH SHOPS, WORKSHOP ARCH-SPACE UNITS AND RESTAURANTS, ALL SET AROUND A MARKET YARD AND NEWLY LANDSCAPED PUBLIC REALM. Our aim is to create a sustainable commercial quarter, one that retains Deptford’s history and heritage whilst complementing the existing Deptford markets and High Street. As well as more established independent businesses, we’re supporting start-ups and small businesses with at least 20% of the lettings for people from or within a 0.5 mile radius of the local area. Deptford Market Yard will create at least 42 new jobs and over £49m of economic growth over the next 10 years. DEPTFORD MARKET YARD : SITE PLAN OCTAVIUS STREET 7 COMMERCIAL UNITS THERE ARE A NUMBER OF EXCITING COMMERCIAL OPPORTUNITIES AT DEPTFORD MARKET YARD: 7 COMMERCIAL UNITS 14 ARCH SPACES LOCATED IN THE WORKSHOPS/RETAIL OCTAVIUS STREET BUILDING MARKET (840 sq ft - 1900 sq ft each) YARD 2 RESTAURANTS BOTH ACCESSED OFF THE MARKET YARD RESTAURANT 2 (circa 2500 sq ft each) 14 ARCH SPACE WORKSHOPS IN THE GRADE II LISTED CARRIAGE RAMP (circa 280 sq ft each) MARKET YARD A NEW STREET MARKET OPPORTUNITY RESTAURANT 1 Not to scale. DEPTFORD MARKET YARD : OCTAVIUS ST UNITS SEVEN COMMERCIAL UNITS ARE LOCATED IN THE OCTAVIUS STREET OCTAVIUS STREET BUILDING ACCESSED OFF 7 COMMERCIAL UNITS THE CARRIAGE RAMP. DEPTFORD MARKET YARD : OCTAVIUS ST UNITS DEPTFORD MARKET YARD : OCTAVIUS ST UNITS COMMERCIAL UNIT 1 OCTAVIUS DOUBLE HEIGHT STREET UNITS Unit 1 is split over two levels, with access at the ground floor level.
    [Show full text]
  • GROUND FLOOR & BASEMENT PUB to LET Deptford
    agg.uk.com | 020 7836 7826 GROUND FLOOR & BASEMENT PUB TO LET Deptford, SE8 LORD PALMERSTON, 81 CHILDERS STREET, DEPTFORD, LONDON, SE8 5JR Situated within a densely populated residential area. Total gross internal area approx. 230 sq m (2,500 sq ft). Located circa 600 metres of Deptford and New Cross Railway Stations. May suit alternative uses (subject to obtaining necessary consents). AVAILABLE BY WAY OF A FREE-OF-TIE NEW LEASE – All terms to be negotiated RENTAL OFFERS INVITED SUBJECT TO CONTRACT – sole letting agents LONL522 8 Exchange Court, Covent Garden, London WC2R 0JU • Tel: 020 7836 7826 • www.agg.uk.com Directors A.R. Alder BSc (Hons) FRICS • J.B. Grimes BSc(Hons) MRICS • D. Gooderham MRICS • R.A. Negus BSc MRICS • M.L. Penfold BSc (Hons) MRICS • Associate Director P.A. Themistocli BSc (Hons) MRICS Notice AG&G for themselves and for the vendor of this property, whose agents they are given notice that 1. These particulars do not form any part of the offer or contract. 2 They are intended to give a fair description of the property. but neither AG&G nor the vendor accept responsibility for any error they may contain, however caused. Any intending purchaser must therefore satisfy himself by inspection or otherwise as to their correctness. 3 neither AG&G, nor any of their employees, has any authority to make or give any further representation or warranty in relation to this property. Unless otherwise stated, all prices and rents are quoted exclusive of Value Added Tax (VAT). Any intending purchasers or lessees must satisfy themselves independently as to the incidence of VAT in respect of any transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to Call for Evidence from Individuals
    Submissions to call for evidence from individuals 1 Ref Individual Name RD-35 Andrew Bosi RD-36 Ann Lusmore RD-37 ‘Bruce’ Rail User RD-38 Chris Torrero RD-39 D.M. Byrne RD-40 David Dando RD-41 Fenella De Smet RD-42 Graham Larkbey RD-43 Guiliana Castle RD-44 Joe Webb RD-45 John Linwood RD-46 Jon Salmon RD-47 Joseph Barnsley RD-48 Laurel Rutledge RD-49 Laurence Mack RD-50a Lewis Cooke RD-50b Lewis Cooke RD-51 Luke Nicolaides RD-52 Cllr O Rybinkski RD-53 Matt Buck RD-54 Patricia Taylor RD-55 Phil Vasili RD-56 Peter Haggett RD-57 Phil Wass RD-58a Philip Ridley RD-58b Philip Ridley RD-58c Philip Ridley RD-59 Richard Logue RD-60a Rob Knight RD-60b Rob Knight RD-61 Robert Woolley RD-62 Simon Feldman RD-63 Steve Whitehead RD-64 Vic Heerah RD-65 Zara Stewart 2 RD - 35 Thank you for the invitation to comment. 1. What are the key problems with National Rail services in London that need to be addressed? They are less frequent than tubes and London Overground services, they end too early, there are insufficent staff members on stations. 2. What changes to the delivery, funding or governance of rail services in London should be considered? The concession arrangement granted to LOROL has transformed the services in question, proving that increasing the frequency and attractiveness of the service brings people off the roads and onto rail, or out of their homes to become economically active. 3.
    [Show full text]