DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment Lewisham local development framework Sustainability appraisal and strategic environmental assessment Site allocations proposed submission DPD March 2012 Copy for public consultation NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ......................................................................................................5 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................12 1.1 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 LEWISHAM LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK .......................................................................... 13 1.3 LEWISHAM CORE STRATEGY .......................................................................................................... 13 1.4 SITE ALLOCATIONS DPD................................................................................................................. 16 1.5 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENT FOR SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL .................................................... 19 1.6 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DIRECTIVE ............................................................. 19 1.7 PURPOSE OF SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL ..................................................................................... 22 1.8 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 23 1.9 THE HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT (HRA) PROCESS .................................................. 31 1.10 EQUALITIES ANALYSIS ASSESSMENT............................................................................................. 31 1.11 WHO CARRIED OUT THE SA ............................................................................................................ 31 1.12 CONSULTATION ON THE SA............................................................................................................. 31 2. SEA OBJECTIVES BASELINE AND CONTEXT.................................................................32 2.1 PURPOSE OF THE SEA .................................................................................................................... 32 2.2 CURRENT AND PREDICTED FUTURE SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................................................................ 33 2.3 AN OUTLINE OF THE BOROUGH ....................................................................................................... 33 2.4 PEOPLE.............................................................................................................................................. 35 2.5 HOUSING ........................................................................................................................................... 38 2.6 JOBS .................................................................................................................................................. 39 2.7 TOWN CENTRES................................................................................................................................ 42 2.8 TRANSPORT ...................................................................................................................................... 43 2.9 OPEN SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSETS................................................................................. 44 2.10 CHARACTER AND HERITAGE ASSETS.............................................................................................. 46 2.11 CLIMATE CHANGE ............................................................................................................................. 47 2.12 WASTE MANAGEMENT...................................................................................................................... 48 2.13 FLOOD RISK....................................................................................................................................... 49 2.14 LOCAL AIR QUALITY .......................................................................................................................... 49 2.15 COMMUNITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................................................................. 51 2.16 COMMUNITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................................................................. 52 3. LIKELY TREND WITHOUT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SITE ALLOCATIONS DPD ......54 3.1 SOCIO-ECONOMIC TRENDS.............................................................................................................. 54 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL TRENDS ............................................................................................................... 54 4. MAIN ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES FACING LEWISHAM ......56 4.1 IDENTIFIED ISSUES ........................................................................................................................... 56 4.2 DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN CARRYING OUT THE ASSESSMENT........................................... 60 5. SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................62 5.1 SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND INDICATORS....................................... 62 5.2 TESTING THE OBJECTIVES OF THE SITE ALLOCATIONS DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENT ........ 68 5.3 TESTING THE INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF THE SA OBJECTIVES ................................................ 70 6. OPTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................73 6.1 UNDERSTANDING THE APPRAISAL .................................................................................................. 73 6.2 DEVELOPING THE ISSUES AND OPTIONS (2005) ........................................................................... 73 6.3 PREFERRED OPTIONS (2007) ......................................................................................................... 75 6.4 FURTHER OPTIONS (2010) .............................................................................................................. 76 6.5 APPRAISING THE PROPOSED SUBMISSION SITE ALLOCATIONS (2012)....................................... 77 6.5.1 Appraisal of land uses ..............................................................................................78 6.5.2 Appraisal of collective land uses within each Core Strategy spatial area .................86 6.5.3 The Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) process ............................................88 6.5.4 Equalities Analysis Assessment...............................................................................89 LDF Sustainability Appraisal – Site Allocations Proposed Submission DPD 2 7. CUMULATIVE AND SHORT-MEDIUM TERM EFFECTS....................................................91 7.1 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 91 7.2 ASSESSMENT FINDINGS ................................................................................................................... 91 7.3 SA REPORT SITE ALLOCATIONS FURTHER OPTIONS CONSULTATION RESPONSES ................. 92 7.4 PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES................................................................................................ 93 7.5 UNCERTAINTIES................................................................................................................................ 96 7.6 RISKS ................................................................................................................................................. 96 8. IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................................................................97 8.1 MONITORING ..................................................................................................................................... 97 APPENDIX 1 LEWISHAM CORE STRATEGY VISION AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES .........99 A1.1 CORE STRATEGY VISION FOR LEWISHAM 2026 .............................................................. 99 A1.2 CORE STRATEGY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES................................................................... 101 APPENDIX 2 SITE OPTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES ...............................................................105 APPENDIX 3 LAND USE ALLOCATION APPRAISAL .............................................................115 APPENDIX 4 APPRAISAL OF EACH SITE ALLOCATION OPTION AND ALTERNATIVE.....202 APPENDIX 5 MONITORING FRAMEWORK AND BASELINE INFORMATION AND TRENDS ....................................................................................................................................................359 APPENDIX 6 OTHER PLANS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES.............................................375 APPENDIX 7 CONSULTATION RESPONSES..........................................................................390 APPENDIX 8 SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL AND STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, SITE ALLOCATIONS FURTHER OPTIONS REPORT, OCTOBER 2010.......413 APPENDIX 9 SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL AND STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, DEVELOPMENT POLICIES AND SITE ALLOCATIONS PREFERRED OPTIONS REPORT, APRIL 2007 ..............................................................................................413 LDF Sustainability Appraisal – Site Allocations Proposed Submission DPD 3 Abbreviations AA Appropriate Assessment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arch 133, Deptford Railway Station, London
    Arch 133, Deptford Railway Station, London Location Rent Deptford in South East London has benefited from major investment £28,000 per annum exclusive. over the last few years and now has a thriving vibrant local community of creatives and professionals. Rates The listed arches are situated on the approach to Deptford Station, Rateable Value To be assessed. accessed via Deptford High Street. Rates Payable 2016/17 To be assessed. The arches share a market yard with The Deptford Project – a new mixed Interested parties are advised to make their own enquiries to Lewisham use scheme extending to 14 arches, 7 commercial units, 2 restaurants, 3 Council (020 8314 6000). town houses and 140 apartments. Specification Accommodation The arch will be handed over in shell condition with a new corrugated Ground Floor 1,038 sq ft 96.47 sq m lining and capped services – further details upon request. Total 1,038 sq ft 96.47 sq m Energy Performance Certificate To be assessed. Lease Term Costs Available on a new standard Network Rail leases – further details upon request. Each party is to be responsible for their own legal costs incurred in the transaction. Contact Tom Jamson +44 (0)20 7317 3722 [email protected] +44 (0)20 7317 3700 | www.klm-re.com Misrepresentation Act 1967 & Property Misdescription Act 1991. These Particulars are believed to be correct but their accuracy is not guaranteed, are set out as a general guide and do not constitute the whole or part of a contract. All liability, in negligence or otherwise, arising from the use of the particulars is hereby excluded.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Current and Future Cruise Ship Requirements in London
    London Development Agency June 2009 AN ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT AND FUTURE CRUISE SHIP REQUIREMENTS IN LONDON In conjunction with: 5 Market Yard Mews 194 Bermondsey Street London SE1 3TQ Tel: 020 7642 5111 Email: [email protected] CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Current cruise facilities in central London 4 3. The organisational and planning context 8 4. The cruise market and future demand 11 5. Views of cruise operators 19 6. Potential for growing cruise calls to London 22 7. Assessment of potential sites 24 8. Lessons from elsewhere 37 9. Conclusions 51 Appendices: Appendix 1: List of consultees Appendix 2: Seatrade cruise market report Appendix 3: Location plan of potential sites Appendix 4: Economic impact study Appendix 5: Overview of costs The Tourism Company – Assessment of current and future cruise ship requirements 2 1. INTRODUCTION This report was commissioned by the London Development Agency (LDA) and Greater London Authority (GLA), with support from the Port of London Authority (PLA) in response to a need for a better understanding of London’s future cruise facility requirements. This need is identified in the London Tourism Vision for 2006-2016, and associated Action Plan 2006-2009, under the theme ‘A Sustainable and Inclusive City’, one of whose objectives is to ‘Increase the profile and usage of services along the Thames’. London currently hosts a relatively small number of cruise ships each year, making use of the informal and basic mooring and passenger facilities at Tower Bridge and Greenwich. The aim of this research is to assess the extent to which the lack of a dedicated, more efficient cruise facility is discouraging operators from bringing cruise ships to London, and if there is latent demand, how might this be accommodated.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2016, London
    London Register 2016 HERITAGE AT RISK 2016 / LONDON Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Greater London 1 Barking and Dagenham 1 Barnet 2 Bexley 5 Brent 5 Bromley 6 Camden 11 City of London 20 Croydon 21 Ealing 24 Enfield 27 Greenwich 30 Hackney 34 Hammersmith and Fulham 40 Haringey 43 Harrow 47 Havering 50 Hillingdon 51 Hounslow 58 Islington 64 Kensington and Chelsea 70 Kingston upon Thames 81 Lambeth 82 Lewisham 91 London Legacy (MDC) 95 Merton 96 Newham 101 Redbridge 103 Richmond upon Thames 104 Southwark 108 Sutton 116 Tower Hamlets 117 Waltham Forest 123 Wandsworth 126 Westminster, City of 129 II London Summary 2016 he Heritage at Risk Register in London reflects the diversity of our capital’s historic environment. It includes 682 buildings and sites known to be at risk from Tneglect, decay or inappropriate development - everything from an early 18th century church designed by Nicholas Hawksmoor, to a boathouse built during WWI on an island in the Thames. These are sites that need imagination and investment. In London the scale of this challenge has grown. There are 12 more assets on the Heritage at Risk Register this year compared to 2015. We also know that it’s becoming more expensive to repair many of our buildings at risk. In the face of these challenges we’re grateful for the help and support of all those who continue to champion our historic environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambeth Overground Stations Study Contents
    Feasibility Study for New Stations and Station Improvements on the Overground in Lambeth Final Report 4.0 Monday, 07 July 2014 Prepared for: LB Lambeth Prepared by: Steer Davies Gleave 28-32 Upper Ground London, SE1 9PD +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com 2 Lambeth Overground Stations Study Contents 3 4 Contents 1. Introduction and Scope 2. Strategic Transport Context ■ The study area and related projects ■ Current travel patterns ■ Policy considerations ■ Rail demand ■ Operational considerations 3. Existing Railway Stations ■ Current demand ■ Constraints and issues ■ Opportunities 4. New Stations ■ Brixton Overground Station ■ Loughborough Overground Junction 5. Funding Opportunities ■ Sources of Funding 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ■ Potential Investment Programme 5 6 1 1 2 3 4 5 Lambeth Overground Stations Study Section 1: Introduction 7 1 1 2 3 4 5 Introduction Introduction Steer Davies Gleave was commissioned by LB Lambeth in January 2014 to undertake a feasibility study for new stations and station improvements on the London Overground services in the London Borough of Lambeth. The primary aim of the study is to assess and The primary aim of the study is: review the case for building new stations at Brixton and Loughborough Junction and consider opportunities to improve Clapham High Street and Wandsworth Road stations and the existing Brixton and Loughborough Junction stations. to develop a case for building new stations at Study Scope Brixton and Loughborough Junction; The outputs of our study were to: Set out the strategic transport context – the public transport connections to Loughborough Junction, Brixton, Clapham High Street and and Wandsworth Road and the opportunities for strategic interchange at Loughborough Junction and Brixton.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report 2011-12
    Lewisham local development framework Annual monitoring report 2011-12 December 2012 Contents Executive summary 7 1 Content 7 2 Setting the context 7 3 Assessing performance in plan making 7 4 Focussing development in the regeneration and growth areas 7 5 Assessing whether planning policies are being implemented 8 6 Assessing performance in planning application decisions 9 7 Conclusion 10 1. Introduction 11 1.1 Indicators 11 1.2 Local planning policies 11 1.3 Sources of data 12 1.4 Structure of report 12 2. Lewisham in context 13 2.1 Overview 13 2.2 What are the trends? 15 2.2.1 Population growth 15 2.2.2 Population composition 16 2.2.3 Migrants 17 2.2.4 Ethnic composition 18 2.2.5 Deprivation 18 3. Planning policy framework 20 3.1 What is the LDF? 20 3.2 Legislation and regulations 21 3.3 Lewisham’s LDS 22 3.4 LDF progress in 2011/12 22 3.4.1 Core Strategy 23 3.4.2 Site Allocations Local Plan 23 3.4.3 Lewisham Town Centre Local Plan 24 3.4.4 Development Management Local Plan 24 3.4.5 Catford Town Centre Local Plan 24 3.4.6 Supplementary planning documents 25 3.4.7 Evidence base reports 25 3.5 Impact of Localism Act and other government changes 27 3.5.1 Neighbourhood Plans and Development Orders 27 3.5.2 Community Infrastructure Levy 27 3.5.3 Duty to Co-operate 28 LDF – Annual Monitoring Report 2011-12 1 4. Regeneration and growth areas 30 4.1 Introduction 31 4.2 Deptford and New Cross 31 4.3 Lewisham Town Centre 38 4.4 Catford Town Centre 40 5.
    [Show full text]
  • (Core) Strategy
    LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Development Polices & Site Allocations THE PREFERRED OPTIONS REPORT May 2007 IMPORTANT INFORMATION WHAT IS THIS REPORT? If you would like to speak to the Planning Policy This is the Preferred Options Report for the Team about the report, you can telephone us Council’s Development Polices and Site on 020 8314 7400. Allocations Development Plan Document (DPD). It contains policies that will be used to HOW CAN I COMMENT? assess planning applications for new We need your feedback on what you think of development and change of use. It also the preferred options presented in this report. contains policies for specific sites and • We want to know what you think? designates certain land for a specific land use • Can improvements be made? e.g. housing, employment etc. • What do you think of the draft policies? The report provides the detailed planning Comments must be in writing and sent to: policies and builds on the Council’s vision, • Planning Policy spatial strategy and core policies contained in London Borough of Lewisham the document called People, Places and 5th Floor, Laurence House Spaces, the LDFs Spatial (Core) Strategy. At 1 Catford Road, Catford, SE6 4RU; or this stage the policies represent the Council’s • E-mail your comments to: preferred approach it is considering adopting. [email protected] with ‘LDF Development Policies & Site Allocations WHY HAS IT BEEN PREPARED? Preferred Options’ as the subject. New planning legislation required the Council to produce a new set of planning policy The consultation period for the Preferred documents. Collectively these documents are Options Report ends on Friday 3rd August 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • London Plan Annual Monitoring Report 2015/16 July 2017
    Strategy Title SUBTITLE London Plan Annual Monitoring Report 2015/16 JULY 2017 Date COPYRIGHT CONTENTS Table 1.1 - Main contents Greater London Authority Executive Summary 1 July 2017 Chapter 1 - Introduction 9 Published by Greater London Authority Chapter 2 - Performance Against Key Performance Indicator Targets City Hall 15 The Queen’s Walk Key Performance Indicator 1 16 More London Key Performance Indicator 2 19 London SE1 2AA Key Performance Indicator 3 21 Key Performance Indicator 4 24 www.london.gov.uk Key Performance Indicator 5 29 Enquiries 020 7983 4100 Key Performance Indicator 6 34 Minicom 020 7983 4458 Key Performance Indicator 7 35 Key Performance Indicator 8 36 Key Performance Indicator 9 41 All data from the London Development Database (LDD) except where stated. Key Performance Indicator 10 43 Key Performance Indicator 11 44 Crown Copyright all rights reserved. GLA 10032216 (2017) Key Performance Indicator 12 46 Front cover photo: Eleanor Ward/GLA Key Performance Indicator 13 49 Key Performance Indicator 14 50 Key Performance Indicator 15 52 Key Performance Indicator 16 54 Copies of this document are available from http://www.london.gov.uk Key Performance Indicator 17 57 Key Performance Indicator 18 59 Key Performance Indicator 19 61 Key Performance Indicator 20 63 Key Performance Indicator 21 66 Key Performance Indicator 22 69 Key Performance Indicator 23 70 Key Performance Indicator 24 72 IV LONDON PLAN AMR 13 LONDON PLAN AMR 13 V Chapter 3 - Additional Perfomance Measures and Statistics 75 Housing and Design 76 Housing
    [Show full text]
  • Development Polices & Site Allocations
    LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Development Polices & Site Allocations THE PREFERRED OPTIONS REPORT March 2007 IMPORTANT INFORMATION WHAT IS THIS REPORT? If you would like to speak to the Planning Policy This is the Preferred Options Report for the Team about the report, you can telephone us Council’s Development Polices and Site on 020 8314 7400. Allocations Development Plan Document (DPD). It contains policies that will be used to HOW CAN I COMMENT? assess planning applications for new We need your feedback on what you think of development and change of use. It also the preferred options presented in this report. contains policies for specific sites and • We want to know what you think? designates certain land for a specific land use • Can improvements be made? e.g. housing, employment etc. • What do you think of the draft policies? The report provides the detailed planning Comments must be in writing and sent to: policies and builds on the Council’s vision, • Planning Policy spatial strategy and core policies contained in London Borough of Lewisham the document called People, Places and 5th Floor, Laurence House Spaces, the LDFs Spatial (Core) Strategy. At 1 Catford Road, Catford, SE6 4RU; or this stage the policies represent the Council’s • E-mail your comments to: preferred approach it is considering adopting. [email protected] with ‘LDF Development Policies & Site Allocations WHY HAS IT BEEN PREPARED? Preferred Options’ as the subject. New planning legislation required the Council to produce a new set of planning policy The consultation period for the Preferred documents. Collectively these documents are Options Report ends on 13th July, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • By Bellway Homes a VIBRANT NEW COLLECTION of 1, 2 & 3 BEDROOM APARTMENTS JUST 3 MINUTES DRIVE from GREENWICH
    by Bellway Homes A VIBRANT NEW COLLECTION OF 1, 2 & 3 BEDROOM APARTMENTS JUST 3 MINUTES DRIVE FROM GREENWICH Welcome to Kent Wharf, Deptford. , It ’’’’’’’’’s the place to be, one of LONDON’S newest THE 1, 2 & 3 BEDROOM APARTMENTS AT KENT WHARF OFFER STANDOUT LIVING IN AN INCREDIBLE CITY LOCATION Computed generated image. INTERIORon trend DESIGN Computed generated image. The CANARY CITY DEPTFORD STATION WHARF GREENWICH Stratford THE O2 Computed enhanced aerial image. TAKE IN picturesquebreathtaking VIEWS OF THE CAPITAL Computer generated image. Perfectly PLACED TO There are few cities in the world more captivating than London. Whether it’s catching a show in the West End, LANDMARKS ENTERTAINMENT STATIONS taking a trip on the London Eye or visiting a historic building. It’s all just waiting for you to discover it. Tower Bridge - 11 minutes The O2 - 10 minutes Greenwich - 2 minutes Kent Wharf is in an enviable position when it comes to commuting into the City. You’re a 10 The Shard - 14 minutes Westfield, Stratford - 20 minutes Canary Wharf - 17 minutes minute walk from Deptford Railway Station, from where overground journeys into London Bridge take 8 minutes, with London Cannon Street accessible in 13 minutes. London Eye - 19 minutes Shoreditch - 21 minutes Bank - 23 minutes Deptford Bridge DLR station is also a 10 minute walk from home, taking you to Canary Wharf Big Ben - 20 minutes Southbank - 21 minutes City Airport - 26 minutes in 17 minutes. International travel is a breeze, you can reach London City Airport in 26 minutes from Deptford Bridge. The City - 21 minutes The West End - 27 minutes Waterloo - 29 minutes Map not to scale and is for visual purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Deptford Market Yard Is Well Connected to Central London
    COMMERCIAL UNITS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & FLOOR PLANS DEPTFORD MARKET YARD DEPTFORD MARKET YARD HAS TRANSFORMED THE AREA ADJACENT TO DEPTFORD RAILWAY STATION INTO A NEW, VIBRANT PART OF THE TOWN CENTRE WITH SHOPS, WORKSHOP ARCH-SPACE UNITS AND RESTAURANTS, ALL SET AROUND A MARKET YARD AND NEWLY LANDSCAPED PUBLIC REALM. Our aim is to create a sustainable commercial quarter, one that retains Deptford’s history and heritage whilst complementing the existing Deptford markets and High Street. As well as more established independent businesses, we’re supporting start-ups and small businesses with at least 20% of the lettings for people from or within a 0.5 mile radius of the local area. Deptford Market Yard will create at least 42 new jobs and over £49m of economic growth over the next 10 years. DEPTFORD MARKET YARD : SITE PLAN OCTAVIUS STREET 7 COMMERCIAL UNITS THERE ARE A NUMBER OF EXCITING COMMERCIAL OPPORTUNITIES AT DEPTFORD MARKET YARD: 7 COMMERCIAL UNITS 14 ARCH SPACES LOCATED IN THE WORKSHOPS/RETAIL OCTAVIUS STREET BUILDING MARKET (840 sq ft - 1900 sq ft each) YARD 2 RESTAURANTS BOTH ACCESSED OFF THE MARKET YARD RESTAURANT 2 (circa 2500 sq ft each) 14 ARCH SPACE WORKSHOPS IN THE GRADE II LISTED CARRIAGE RAMP (circa 280 sq ft each) MARKET YARD A NEW STREET MARKET OPPORTUNITY RESTAURANT 1 Not to scale. DEPTFORD MARKET YARD : OCTAVIUS ST UNITS SEVEN COMMERCIAL UNITS ARE LOCATED IN THE OCTAVIUS STREET OCTAVIUS STREET BUILDING ACCESSED OFF 7 COMMERCIAL UNITS THE CARRIAGE RAMP. DEPTFORD MARKET YARD : OCTAVIUS ST UNITS DEPTFORD MARKET YARD : OCTAVIUS ST UNITS COMMERCIAL UNIT 1 OCTAVIUS DOUBLE HEIGHT STREET UNITS Unit 1 is split over two levels, with access at the ground floor level.
    [Show full text]
  • GROUND FLOOR & BASEMENT PUB to LET Deptford
    agg.uk.com | 020 7836 7826 GROUND FLOOR & BASEMENT PUB TO LET Deptford, SE8 LORD PALMERSTON, 81 CHILDERS STREET, DEPTFORD, LONDON, SE8 5JR Situated within a densely populated residential area. Total gross internal area approx. 230 sq m (2,500 sq ft). Located circa 600 metres of Deptford and New Cross Railway Stations. May suit alternative uses (subject to obtaining necessary consents). AVAILABLE BY WAY OF A FREE-OF-TIE NEW LEASE – All terms to be negotiated RENTAL OFFERS INVITED SUBJECT TO CONTRACT – sole letting agents LONL522 8 Exchange Court, Covent Garden, London WC2R 0JU • Tel: 020 7836 7826 • www.agg.uk.com Directors A.R. Alder BSc (Hons) FRICS • J.B. Grimes BSc(Hons) MRICS • D. Gooderham MRICS • R.A. Negus BSc MRICS • M.L. Penfold BSc (Hons) MRICS • Associate Director P.A. Themistocli BSc (Hons) MRICS Notice AG&G for themselves and for the vendor of this property, whose agents they are given notice that 1. These particulars do not form any part of the offer or contract. 2 They are intended to give a fair description of the property. but neither AG&G nor the vendor accept responsibility for any error they may contain, however caused. Any intending purchaser must therefore satisfy himself by inspection or otherwise as to their correctness. 3 neither AG&G, nor any of their employees, has any authority to make or give any further representation or warranty in relation to this property. Unless otherwise stated, all prices and rents are quoted exclusive of Value Added Tax (VAT). Any intending purchasers or lessees must satisfy themselves independently as to the incidence of VAT in respect of any transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to Call for Evidence from Individuals
    Submissions to call for evidence from individuals 1 Ref Individual Name RD-35 Andrew Bosi RD-36 Ann Lusmore RD-37 ‘Bruce’ Rail User RD-38 Chris Torrero RD-39 D.M. Byrne RD-40 David Dando RD-41 Fenella De Smet RD-42 Graham Larkbey RD-43 Guiliana Castle RD-44 Joe Webb RD-45 John Linwood RD-46 Jon Salmon RD-47 Joseph Barnsley RD-48 Laurel Rutledge RD-49 Laurence Mack RD-50a Lewis Cooke RD-50b Lewis Cooke RD-51 Luke Nicolaides RD-52 Cllr O Rybinkski RD-53 Matt Buck RD-54 Patricia Taylor RD-55 Phil Vasili RD-56 Peter Haggett RD-57 Phil Wass RD-58a Philip Ridley RD-58b Philip Ridley RD-58c Philip Ridley RD-59 Richard Logue RD-60a Rob Knight RD-60b Rob Knight RD-61 Robert Woolley RD-62 Simon Feldman RD-63 Steve Whitehead RD-64 Vic Heerah RD-65 Zara Stewart 2 RD - 35 Thank you for the invitation to comment. 1. What are the key problems with National Rail services in London that need to be addressed? They are less frequent than tubes and London Overground services, they end too early, there are insufficent staff members on stations. 2. What changes to the delivery, funding or governance of rail services in London should be considered? The concession arrangement granted to LOROL has transformed the services in question, proving that increasing the frequency and attractiveness of the service brings people off the roads and onto rail, or out of their homes to become economically active. 3.
    [Show full text]