DOCSLIB.ORG

Form -1 Environmental Clearance for Copper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FORM -1 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE FOR COPPER SMELTER PLANT –II FOR PRODUCING 1200 TPD COPPER AT SIPCOT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, THERKKU VEERAPANDIAPURAM VILLAGE, OTTAPIDARAM TALUK, THOOTHUKKUDI, TAMILNADU Submitted to: Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change New Delhi Submitted by: Vedanta Ltd., Copper Smelter Plant -II Thoothukudi. January, 2018 Form -1 FORM 1 (I) Basic Information S.No. Item Details 1. Name of the Project/s Vedanta Ltd., Copper Smelter Plant -II (1200 TPD Copper) 2. S. No. in the schedule Category A: 3(a) Primary metallurgical industry. 3. Proposed capacity / area / S. Plant –II Products length / tonnage to be No. units in TPD handled / command area I Main Products / lease area / number of 1 Copper Anode 1200 wells to be drilled 2 Copper Cathode 1525 (from anodes produced) 3 Continuous Copper Rod 800 (from cathodes produced) 4 Phosphoric Acid 800 II Intermediate Products 5 Anode slime (refinery) 3 6 Dore Anode 0.65 (from Anode Slime produced) 7 Selenium 1.2 (from Anode Slime produced) 8 Bismuth Bi sulphate 1.8 (from foul Electrolyte produced) 9 Copper telluride 0.6 (from foul Electrolyte produced) 10 Nickel sludge (from foul 30 Electrolyte produced) 11 Nickel (from foul 1.5 Electrolyte produced) III By-Products 12 Sulphuric Acid 4800* 13 Ferro sand 3000 14 Gypsum 4200 15 Hydrofluro-Silicic Acid 80 * - Sulphuric Acid Plant will be designed for 5900 TPD considering the extreme case scenario of sulphur content in the Copper Concentrate. S.No. Item Details 4. New / Expansion / New Plant Modernization 5. Existing Capacity / Area Not applicable etc 6. Category of Project i.e. ‘A’ Category-A: 3(a) Primary metallurgical or ‘B’ industry. 7. Does it attract the general Not applicable condition? If yes, please specify. 8. Does it attract the specific Not applicable condition? If yes, please specify. 9. Location Copper Smelter Plant – II will be located at SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Therkku Veerapandia Puram Village in Thoothukudi. Latitude & Longitude: Northwest-08°50’29.9”N 78°04’12.9”E Southwest-08°49’45.3”N 78°04’05”E Southeast-08°49’32.9”N 78°04’40.7”E Northeast-08°49’58.8”N 78°04’47.8”E Plot / Survey / Khasra No. Survey Numbers are referred in Annexure - 1 Village Therku Veera Pandia Puram Tehsil Ottapidaram. District Thoothukudi State Tamil Nadu 10. Nearest railway station / Meelavittan (2.0-km, SE) airport along with distance in kms. 11. Nearest Town, City, Thoothukkudi (8.4-km, ESE) District Headquarters along with distance in kms. 12. Village Panchayats, Zilla Therku Veera Pandia Puram Village Panchayat Parishad, Municipal Ottapidaram Taluk. Corporation, Local body Thoothukudi District (complete postal Thoothukudi – 628002. addresses with telephone nos. to be given) 13. Name of the applicant Vedanta Ltd., Copper Smelter Plant -II (1200 TPD Copper) 14. Registered Address 1st Floor, ‘C’ Wing, Unit 103, Corporate Avenue, Atul Projects, Chakala, Andheri (E), Mumbai – 400 093 15. Address for Sterlite Copper (A unit of Vedanta Limited), correspondence : SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Madurai Bypass Road, Thoothukudi – 628002 Tamilnadu S.No. Item Details Name P.Ramnath Designation Chief Executive Officer, (Owner/Partner/CEO) Vedanta Ltd., Copper Smelter Plant -II Address Copper Smelter Plant – II (1200 TPD Copper) SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Therkku Veerapandia Puram Village, Thoothukudi. Pin Code 628002 Email [email protected] Telephone No. 0461 – 4242222 Fax No. 0461 – 4242047 16. Details of Alternative Sites Copper Smelter Project -II is under examined, if any. Location construction as per EC F.No. J- of these sites should be 11011/431/2008-IA II (I) dated 01st shown on a topo sheet. January 2009 valid up to 31.12.2018. Hence alternative sites are not examined. 17. Interlinked Projects Not applicable 18. Whether separate Not applicable application of interlinked project has been submitted? 19. If yes, date of submission Not applicable 20. If no, reason Not applicable 21. Whether the proposal Not applicable involves approval/clearance under: if yes, details of the same and their status to be given. (a) The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980? (b) The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972? (c) The C.R.Z Notification, 1991? 22. Whether there is any Not applicable Government Order/Policy relevant/relating to the site? 23. Forest land involved Not applicable (hectares) 24. Whether there is any Not applicable litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is propose to be set up? (a) Name of the Court (b) Case No. (c) Orders/directions of the Court, if any and its relevance with the proposed project. (II) Activity 1. Construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involving actions, which will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land use, changes in water bodies, etc.) Details thereof (with approximate quantities Information/Checklist Yes/ S.No. /rates, wherever possible) confirmation No with source of information data 1.1 Permanent or temporary change in No This Copper Smelter Plant II land use, land cover or topography land site is developed by including increase in intensity of State Industries Promotion land use (with respect to local Corporation of Tamil Nadu land use plan) Limited, (SIPCOT), Government of Tamilnadu. 1.2 Clearance of existing land, No Not applicable vegetation and buildings? 1.3 Creation of new land uses? No Not applicable 1.4 Pre-construction investigations e.g. Yes Pre-construction bore houses, soil testing? investigations were completed and construction is in progress. 1.5 Construction works? Yes The units like ISA Furnace - Smelter, H2SO4 plant, Phosphoric Acid Plant, Copper Refinery, Continuous Copper rod plant and minor/precious metal recovery plant etc are being constructed as per EC F.No. J-11011/431/2008- IA II (I) dated 01st January 2009 valid up to 31.12.2018. 1.6 Demolition works? No Not envisaged, since it is green field project. 1.7 Temporary sites used for No Contractor offices, housing construction works or housing of facilities and canteen construction workers? facilities are provided for construction workers. 1.8 Above ground buildings, structures Yes Above ground buildings, or earthworks including linear structures and earthworks structures, cut and fill or excavations are there. 1.9 Underground works including mining No Not envisaged. or tunneling? 1.10 Reclamation works? No Not envisaged 1.11 Dredging? No Not envisaged 1.12 Offshore structures? No Not envisaged 1.13 Production and manufacturing Yes Enclosed as Annexure –1 processes? 1.14 Facilities for storage of goods or Yes Material stock yard are materials? provided in the proposed project. 1.15 Facilities for treatment or disposal of Yes Enclosed as Annexure -2 solid waste or liquid effluents? 1.16 Facilities for long term housing of No Housing colony already operational workers? exists. 1.17 New road, rail or sea traffic during Yes Approach road has been construction or operation? provided and Material conveying shall be planned from the railway siding for material movement. 1.18 New road, rail, air waterborne or Yes Approach road has been other transport infrastructure provided. Our Railway including new or altered routes and siding in Meelavittan will be stations, ports, airports etc? utilized to transport raw materials and products during plant operation. 1.19 Closure or diversion of existing No Not envisaged transport routes or infrastructure leading to changes in traffic movements? 1.20 New or diverted transmission lines No Not envisaged or pipelines? 1.21 Impoundment, damming, culverting, Yes Natural Nullah used for rain realignment or other changes to the water drainage will be hydrology of watercourses or reoriented. aquifers? 1.22 Stream crossings? Yes Natural Nullah used for rain water drainage will be reoriented. 1.23 Abstraction or transfers of water No Not envisaged. form ground or surface waters? 1.24 Changes in water bodies or the land Yes Natural Nullah used for rain surface affecting drainage or run- water drainage will be off? reoriented. 1.25 Transport of personnel or materials Yes Approach road has been for construction, operation or provided. decommissioning? 1.26 Long-term dismantling or No Not applicable decommissioning or restoration works? 1.27 Ongoing activity during No Not applicable decommissioning which could have an impact on the environment? 1.28 Influx of people to an area in either No Not envisaged temporarily or permanently? 1.29 Introduction of alien species? No Not envisaged 1.30 Loss of native species or genetic No Not envisaged diversity? 1.31 Any other actions? No Not envisaged 2. Use of Natural resources for construction or operation of the Project (such as land, water, materials or energy, especially any resources which are non-renewable or in short supply): Details thereof (with Information/checklist Yes/ approximate quantities /rates, S.No. confirmation No wherever possible) with source of information data Land especially undeveloped or No This Copper Smelter Plant – II 2.1 agricultural land (ha) land site is developed in State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited, (SIPCOT) Industrial Area, Government of Tamilnadu. Yes Fresh raw water requirement 2.2 Water (expected source & competing for proposed Copper users) unit: KLD Smelter Plant -II is about 8773 KLD. Already Vedanta Ltd., has approval from SIPCOT for 4.16 MGD water supply (Enclosed as Annexure-3) and the unit is using 2 MGD for the existing operation. Hence, additional Water supply for the Copper Smelter –II will be sourced from SIPCOT, Desalination plant / Municipal Sewage water treatment. Yes Enclosed as Annexure-4 2.3 Minerals (MT) Yes Construction material are 2.4 Construction material – stone, sourced from government aggregates, sand / soil (expected source – MT) approved quarries. The Estimated Quantity of construction material is detailed below: Stone : 10000 MT Aggregates : 24000 MT Sand / Soil : 72000 MT Yes Timber : 600 MT 2.5 Forests and timber (source – MT) Yes Enclosed as Annexure-5 2.6 Energy including electricity and fuels (source, competing users) Unit: fuel (MT), energy (MW) No Not envisaged 2.7 Any other natural resources (use appropriate standard units) 3.
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Varied Process Parameters on Froth Flotation Efficiency: a Case Study of Itakpe Iron Ore

    Effects of Varied Process Parameters on Froth Flotation Efficiency: a Case Study of Itakpe Iron Ore

    Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH) Vol. 39, No. 3, July 2020, pp. 807 – 815 Copyright© Faculty of Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Print ISSN: 0331-8443, Electronic ISSN: 2467-8821 www.nijotech.com http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njt.v39i3.21 EFFECTS OF VARIED PROCESS PARAMETERS ON FROTH FLOTATION EFFICIENCY: A CASE STUDY OF ITAKPE IRON ORE S. Akande1, E. O. Ajaka2, O. O. Alabi3 and T. A. Olatunji4,* 1, 2, DEPARTMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING, FEDERAL UNIV. OF TECHNOLOGY, AKURE, ONDO STATE, NIGERIA 3, 4, DEPT. OF MET. & MATERIALS ENGINEERING, FEDERAL UNIV. OF TECHNOLOGY, AKURE, ONDO STATE, NIGERIA Email addresses: 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected], 3 [email protected], 4 [email protected] ABSTRACT The dire need for Itakpe iron ore concentrates of appreciable iron content meets for smelting operation necessitated this study. Core samples of the iron ore sourced from Itakpe, Kogi State, Nigeria were prepared for petrological analysis followed by chemical and particle size analyses. Froth flotation was done using different collectors at varying particle sizes and pH values. Characterization studies carried out revealed that Itakpe iron ore is a lean ore assaying 36.18% Fe2O3 and contains predominantly quartz, sillimanite, and haematite. Its liberation size lies favourably at 75 µm. Processing the ore by froth flotation yielded appreciable enrichment. Optimal recovery (~92%) was achieved using potassium amyl xanthate (PAX) at pH 11 for fine feed sizes (<125 µm) yielding iron concentrate assaying 67.66% Fe2O3. Thus, processing at this set-of- conditions is recommended for the industrial production of more enriched Itakpe iron ore concentrates.
  • Principles of Extractive Metallurgy Lectures Note

    Principles of Extractive Metallurgy Lectures Note

    PRINCIPLES OF EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY B.TECH, 3RD SEMESTER LECTURES NOTE BY SAGAR NAYAK DR. KALI CHARAN SABAT DEPARTMENT OF METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING PARALA MAHARAJA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, BERHAMPUR DISCLAIMER This document does not claim any originality and cannot be used as a substitute for prescribed textbooks. The information presented here is merely a collection by the author for their respective teaching assignments as an additional tool for the teaching-learning process. Various sources as mentioned at the reference of the document as well as freely available material from internet were consulted for preparing this document. The ownership of the information lies with the respective author or institutions. Further, this document is not intended to be used for commercial purpose and the faculty is not accountable for any issues, legal or otherwise, arising out of use of this document. The committee faculty members make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. BPUT SYLLABUS PRINCIPLES OF EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY (3-1-0) MODULE I (14 HOURS) Unit processes in Pyro metallurgy: Calcination and roasting, sintering, smelting, converting, reduction, smelting-reduction, Metallothermic and hydrogen reduction; distillation and other physical and chemical refining methods: Fire refining, Zone refining, Liquation and Cupellation. Small problems related to pyro metallurgy. MODULE II (14 HOURS) Unit processes in Hydrometallurgy: Leaching practice: In situ leaching, Dump and heap leaching, Percolation leaching, Agitation leaching, Purification of leach liquor, Kinetics of Leaching; Bio- leaching: Recovery of metals from Leach liquor by Solvent Extraction, Ion exchange , Precipitation and Cementation process.
  • A Study on Reduction of Copper Smelting Slag by Carbon for Recycling Into Metal Values and Cement Raw Material

    A Study on Reduction of Copper Smelting Slag by Carbon for Recycling Into Metal Values and Cement Raw Material

    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 January 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202001.0177.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Sustainability 2020, 12, 1421; doi:10.3390/su12041421 Article A Study on Reduction of Copper Smelting Slag by Carbon for Recycling into Metal Values and Cement Raw Material Urtnasan Erdenebold and Jei-Pil Wang* Department of Metallurgical Engineering, School of Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 608- 739, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel,: +82-51-629-6341 Abstract: Copper smelting slag is a solution of molten oxides created during the copper smelting and refining process, and about 1.5 million tons of copper slag is generated annually in Korea. Oxides in copper smelting slag include ferrous (FeO), ferric oxide (Fe2O3), silica (SiO2 from flux), alumina (AI2O3), calcia (CaO) and magnesia (MgO). Main oxides in copper slag, which iron oxide and silica, exist in the form of fayalite (2FeO·SiO2). Since the copper smelting slag contains high content of iron, and copper and zinc. Common applications of copper smelting slag are the value added products such as abrasive tools, roofing granules, road-base construction, railroad ballast, fine aggregate in concrete, etc., as well as the some studies have attempted to recover metal values from copper slag. This research was intended to recovery Fe-Cu alloy, raw material of zinc and produce reformed slag like a blast furnace slag for blast furnace slag cement from copper slag. As a results, it was confirmed that reduction smelting by carbon at temperatures above 1400°С is possible to recover pig iron containing copper from copper smelting slag, and CaO additives in the reduction smelting assist to reduce iron oxide in the fayalite and change the chemical and mineralogical composition of the slag.
  • Nickel Laterite Smelting Processes and Some Examples of Recent Possible Modifications to the Conventional Route

    Nickel Laterite Smelting Processes and Some Examples of Recent Possible Modifications to the Conventional Route

    metals Review Nickel Laterite Smelting Processes and Some Examples of Recent Possible Modifications to the Conventional Route Ender Keskinkilic Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Atilim University, 06830 Ankara, Turkey; [email protected]; Tel.: +90-533-302-9510 Received: 16 July 2019; Accepted: 1 September 2019; Published: 3 September 2019 Abstract: The treatment of laterites has been a research hotspot in extractive metallurgy over the past decades. Industrially, the pyrometallurgical treatment of laterites is mostly accomplished with a well-established method, namely, the rotary kiln–electric arc furnace (RKEF) process, which includes three main operations—calcination, prereduction, and smelting—followed by further refining for the removal of impurities from the raw ferro-nickel. As indicated in many studies of the RKEF process, the major downside of this method is its high energy consumption. Efforts have been made to lower this consumption. Furthermore, several new processes have been proposed. Among these, low-grade ferro-nickel production is regarded as the most widely and industrially used process after traditional RKEF operation. Although not widespread, other alternative processes of industrial scale have been generated since the start of the millennium. Recently, certain innovative processes have been tested either in the laboratory or at pilot-scale. In this paper, a literature review related to the smelting of laterites is made, and an emphasis on new processes and some examples of new developments in the RKEF process are presented. Keywords: laterite; smelting; RKEF process; low-grade ferro-nickel 1. Introduction According to a review published by Diaz et al., oxide-type nickel ores accounted for 64% of land-based nickel ores, but more than 60% of nickel production was based on the matte smelting of sulfide ores in 1988 [1].
  • Integral Management of Arsenical Sludge, Treatment and Recovery of By-Products of Acid Waters from Smelter Plants

    Integral Management of Arsenical Sludge, Treatment and Recovery of By-Products of Acid Waters from Smelter Plants

    MILAF: INTEGRAL MANAGEMENT OF ARSENICAL SLUDGE, TREATMENT AND RECOVERY OF BY-PRODUCTS OF ACID WATERS FROM SMELTER PLANTS ULRIKE BROSCHEK, CECILIA VIDAL, LUIS BRAVO and GILDA ZUÑIGA Environmental Program, Fundación Chile Parque Antonio Rabat Sur 6165, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Currently, the copper mining industry produces high amounts of sulfuric acid with low purity and high concentrations of arsenic and other metals. Most of these acid waters are neutralized in the copper smelting plants by using lime to raise the pH from 1 to 12 generating high amounts of arsenical sludge that has to be disposed on safety landfills because of its high toxicity. This has forced the mining companies to pay large sums of money for the disposal of significant volume of solid waste. Each copper smelting plant produces in average during this specific process more than 18,000 tons of arsenical sludge yearly, spending on the treatment and disposal stage more than US 2.8 million dollars per year where a 70 % of this cost corresponds to the disposal costs of the solid waste [1,2,3]. Different technologies for treating these acid wastewaters have been developed and patented worldwide. However, these treatments have focused on obtaining the separation of the arsenic from the effluent through physical-chemical precipitation using different basic components and cations that reacts with the contaminants and then precipitates in the solution [4]. These technologies have not been able to solve the problem because they are expensive, complex, not always efficient and still generates high amounts of arsenical sludge requiring high disposal costs; hence, mining companies have not implement them.
  • National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Secondary Lead Smelting; Final Rules

    National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Secondary Lead Smelting; Final Rules

    Vol. 77 Thursday, No. 3 January 5, 2012 Part II Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 63 National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Secondary Lead Smelting; Final Rules VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:35 Jan 04, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\05JAR2.SGM 05JAR2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 556 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION related to emissions during periods of the telephone number for the Air and AGENCY startup, shutdown, and malfunction. Radiation Docket and Information DATES: This final action is effective on Center is (202) 566–1742. 40 CFR Part 63 January 5, 2012. The incorporation by FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For [EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0344; FRL–9610–9] reference of certain publications listed questions about this final action, contact in the rule is approved by the Director RIN 2060–AQ68 Mr. Nathan Topham, Office of Air of the Federal Register as of January 5, Quality Planning and Standards, Sector 2012. National Emissions Standards for Policies and Programs Division, U.S. ADDRESSES: Hazardous Air Pollutants From The EPA has established a Environmental Protection Agency, Secondary Lead Smelting docket for this action under Docket ID Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0344. All telephone number: (919) 541–0483; fax AGENCY: Environmental Protection documents in the docket are listed on number: (919) 541–3207; and email Agency (EPA). the http://www.regulations.gov Web address: [email protected]. For ACTION: Final rule. site.
  • The Metallurgy of Antimony

    The Metallurgy of Antimony

    Chemie der Erde 72 (2012) S4, 3–8 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Chemie der Erde journal homepage: www.elsevier.de/chemer The metallurgy of antimony Corby G. Anderson ∗ Kroll Institute for Extractive Metallurgy, George S. Ansell Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, United States article info abstract Article history: Globally, the primary production of antimony is now isolated to a few countries and is dominated by Received 4 October 2011 China. As such it is currently deemed a critical and strategic material for modern society. The metallurgical Accepted 10 April 2012 principles utilized in antimony production are wide ranging. This paper will outline the mineral pro- cessing, pyrometallurgical, hydrometallurgical and electrometallurgical concepts used in the industrial Keywords: primary production of antimony. As well an overview of the occurrence, reserves, end uses, production, Antimony and quality will be provided. Stibnite © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Tetrahedrite Pyrometallurgy Hydrometallurgy Electrometallurgy Mineral processing Extractive metallurgy Production 1. Background bullets and armory. The start of mass production of automobiles gave a further boost to antimony, as it is a major constituent of Antimony is a silvery, white, brittle, crystalline solid that lead-acid batteries. The major use for antimony is now as a trioxide exhibits poor conductivity of electricity and heat. It has an atomic for flame-retardants. number of 51, an atomic weight of 122 and a density of 6.697 kg/m3 ◦ ◦ at 26 C. Antimony metal, also known as ‘regulus’, melts at 630 C 2. Occurrence and mineralogy and boils at 1380 ◦C.
  • The Advanced Mining Technologies and Its Impact on the Australian Nonferrous Minerals Industry

    The Advanced Mining Technologies and Its Impact on the Australian Nonferrous Minerals Industry

    Paper Title: PROVEN TECHNOLOGIES FROM XSTRATA AND THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR COPPER SMELTING AND REFINING IN CHINA Paper Presented at: Hainan Conference, China Authors: Mingwei Gao, Philip Arthur and Nigel Aslin, Xstrata Technology Date of Publication: 2004 For further information please contact us at [email protected] www.isasmelt.com PROVEN TECHNOLOGIES FROM XSTRATA AND THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR COPPER SMELTING AND REFINING IN CHINA Mingwei Gao, Philip Arthur and Nigel Aslin Xstrata Technology, Australia 1.0 INTRODUCTION The world’s non-ferrous industry has achieved significant improvements in efficiency in the last 20 years owing to the advanced technologies such as ISASMELT™ and ISA PROCESS that have been invented and developed at Mount Isa Mines in Australia,. A number of large nonferrous mining operations in the world are still in business today largely because of the commercial benefits that resulted from applying these technologies. ISASMELT and ISA PROCESS technologies are marketed worldwide by Xstrata Technology, a division of the Xstrata plc group of companies, which was formed upon Xstrata’s takeover of MIM Holdings Limited in mid 2003. Xstrata PLC is a diversified international mining company and has operations in Australia, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, South Africa, Chile, and Argentina with around 20,000 employees worldwide. Major products are copper, lead, zinc, silver, coal, ferrochrome, and ferrovanadium. In addition to these commodities, an integral part of the group is their independent process technology business – Xstrata Technology. Xstrata group companies have a long record of developing process technologies for in-house use and for sale to external clients. 2.0 ISASMELT™ TECHNOLOGY ISASMELT is a modern bath-smelting process for the production of non-ferrous metals.
  • Metal Losses in Pyrometallurgical Operations - a Review

    Metal Losses in Pyrometallurgical Operations - a Review

    Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 255 (2018) 47–63 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Advances in Colloid and Interface Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cis Historical perspective Metal losses in pyrometallurgical operations - A review Inge Bellemans a,⁎, Evelien De Wilde a,b, Nele Moelans c, Kim Verbeken a a Ghent University, Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Technologiepark 903, B-9052, Zwijnaarde, Ghent, Belgium b Umicore R&D, Kasteelstraat 7, B-2250 Olen, Belgium c KU Leuven, Department of Materials Engineering, Kasteelpark Arenberg 44, bus 2450, B-3001, Heverlee, Leuven, Belgium article info abstract Article history: Nowadays, a higher demand on a lot of metals exists, but the quantity and purity of the ores decreases. The Received 24 October 2016 amount of scrap, on the other hand, increases and thus, recycling becomes more important. Besides recycling, Received in revised 4 August 2017 it is also necessary to improve and optimize existing processes in extractive and recycling metallurgy. One of Accepted 7 August 2017 the main difficulties of the overall-plant recovery are metal losses in slags, in both primary and secondary Available online 10 August 2017 metal production. In general, an increased understanding of the fundamental mechanisms governing these losses could help further improve production efficiencies. This review aims to summarize and evaluate the current sci- Keywords: fi Pyrometallurgy enti c knowledge concerning metal losses and pinpoints the knowledge gaps. Metal losses First, the industrial importance and impact of metal losses in slags will be illustrated by several examples from Slags both ferrous and non-ferrous industries.
  • Flotation of Sulphide Ores - HZL Experience

    Flotation of Sulphide Ores - HZL Experience

    FROTH FLOTATION : RECENT TRENDS @IIME, JAMSHEDPUR, 1998; pp. 18-41 Flotation of Sulphide Ores - HZL Experience V.P. KOHAD Hindustan Zinc Ltd., Zawar Mines, Udaipur - 313 901 ABSTRACT Flotation process, patented in the year 1906, was originally developed for mineral industry to recover values from high grade tailings of gravity separation plants. This technology has acclaimed importance as a versatile process for the beneficiation of vast variety of sulphide minerals. Due to flexibility of the process and remarkable development taken place in flotation technology and its ancillary systems, it has now become possible to recover fine grained sulphide minerals from complex ore deposits, whose processing was earlier considered un- economical. Today, about 400 million tonnes of sulphide ore is treated annually by flotation process worldwide. M/s Hindustan Zinc Ltd. (HZL), a leading lead-zinc mining and smelting company in India has experienced a spectacular growth from the time of its inception. Starting from a single 500 MT per day lead-zinc mine at Zawar, HZL has expanded its mining capacity to about 13,000 MT per day with matching ore beneficiation plants, all adopting froth flotation technology. The phenomenal progress is a result of HZL's emphasis on research and development with an objective to improve the efficiency and to optimize performance, and to seek innovative modern technology and control systems in their flotation plant and processes. This has not only solved metallurgical problems but improved overall plant economics. High grade concentrates produced with reduced deleterious impurities have further enhanced smelting efficiency. The paper covers general principles and aspects of industrial sulphide ore flotation practices in brief and processes adopted in HZL's plants.
  • Remanded Smelting Wastes

    Remanded Smelting Wastes

    REMANDED SMELTING WASTES Technical Background Document Office of Solid Waste U.S. Environmental Protection Agency December 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1 1.0 BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 Exclusion of Mining Wastes from RCRA Regulation ..........................................3 1.2 Development of a Narrower Interpretation of the Mining Waste Exclusion .........3 1.3 Reversion to the 1980 Interpretation of the Mining Waste Exclusion ..................4 1.4 Court Challenges to the Broad Interpretation .......................................................4 1.5 Court Challenges to the Re-Listing ......................................................................4 2.0 INDUSTRY OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................5 2.1 Description of Facilities Generating Wastes ........................................................5 2.2 Description of Industrial Processes and Waste Management .............................6 3.0 BASIS FOR THE NO-LIST DECISION ...........................................................................13 4.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ..............................................................................................14 BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDICES A. Rissmann Trip Report B. Magma and Cyprus Trip Report C. Letter from Benito Garcia,
  • Lead Poisoning in the Smelting and Refining of Lead

    Lead Poisoning in the Smelting and Refining of Lead

    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS ROYAL MEEKER, Commissioner BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES ) (WHOLE 1 A 1 BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS) ' * * (NUMBER lTL 1 INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS AND HYGIENE SERIES: No. 4 LEAD POISONING IN THE SMELTING AND REFINING OF LEAD f FEBRUARY 17, 1914 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis CONTENTS. Lead poisoning in the smelting and refining of lead: Page. Introduction............................................................................................................... 5-17 Dangerous processes in the smelting and refining of lead....... ............... 6-8 Dust and fumes.................................................................................................. 9-11 Sanitary equipment.......................................................................................... 11 Medical care....................................................................................................... 11 Disadvantages of a shifting force................................................................. 11,12 Prevalence of lead poisoning in the industry............................................. 12-14 Prevention of lead poisoning in the smelting industry............................ 14-17 Construction............................................................................................... 15 Sanitary equipment.................................................................................