Appendix 3

Detailed UXO Risk Assessment

1250 R01: Issue 3 – Phase I / II Geoenvironmental Assessment, The Nags Head, Moreton January 2019 Figures and Appendices

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)

Risk Assessment

Project Name The Nags Head, Moreton

Client Green Earth Management Ltd

Site Address Church Road, Moreton, Ongar, CM5 OLF Report Reference DA7268-00 Date 4th October 2018 Originator JM

Find us on Twitter and Facebook 1st Line Defence Limited Company No: 7717863 VAT No: 128 8833 79 Unit 3, Maple Park, Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Herts. EN11 0EX www.1stlinedefence.co.uk Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 [email protected]

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

Executive Summary

Site Location and Description The site is located in the village of Moreton, Essex. The boundary comprises areas an access-way and areas of vacant hardstanding to the rear of The Nags Head public house. A site for mobile homes forms the northern boundary, while the Moreton C of E Primary School borders to the east. Church Road, The Nags Head, and residential property border to the south, while allotment gardens define the western boundary. The site is approximately centred on the OS grid reference: TL 5341007046.

Proposed Works The precise nature of proposed works are currently unknown. If required these can be incorporated into the report at a later date.

Geology and Bomb Penetration Depth The British Geological Survey (BGS) map shows the bedrock geology of the site to be underlain by the London Clay Formation – clay, silt and sand, of the Palaeogene Period. The superficial deposits are comprised of Kesgrave Catchment Subgroup – sand and gravel of the Quaternary Period. Site specific geotechnical information was not available to 1st Line Defence at the time of the production of this report. An assessment of maximum bomb penetration depth can be made once such data becomes available, or by a UXO specialist during on-site support. It should be noted that the maximum depth that a bomb could reach may vary across a site and will be largely dependent on the specific underlying geological strata and its density.

UXO Risk Assessment 1st Line Defence has assessed that there is a Low Risk from items of unexploded German aerial delivered and Allied ordnance across the site. This assessment is based on the following factors:

 During WWII the site was situated within the Ongar Rural District, which sustained a low density of bombing according to Home Office statistics, with an average of 27.9 items recorded per 1,000 acres. Neither the site nor the wider village appear to have sustained any frequent bombing or specific targeting by the Luftwaffe.  No reference to bombing has been encountered within a relevant proximity within ARP message forms or available anecdotal information. The closest reference to bombing occurred at Moreton Bridge, which extends from 300m to the south to 1km to the south-east, beyond the proximity considered relevant for potential UXO contamination.  While the site was primarily undeveloped during WWII, residential and commercial premises – including The Nags Head public house – bordered immediately to the south. The likely novelty of raids/bombing in the immediate area indicates that had bombing occurred, particularly within close proximity to the village, post-raid checks for UXO would have taken place, with evidence of such items noticed and recorded.  The site consisted of open ground during WWII. While evidence of UXO has the potential to become obscured within such ground cover, this is considered to be offset by the proximity of residential and commercial structures, as well as the likely novelty of raids in the vicinity.  There is no evidence that the site formerly had any military occupation or usage that could have led to contamination with items of Allied ordnance, such as LSA and SAA. The conditions in which HAA or LAA projectiles may have fallen unnoticed within the site boundary are however analogous to those regarding aerial delivered ordnance.

Recommended Risk Mitigation Measures The following risk mitigation measures are recommended to support the proposed works at the The Nags Head, Moreton site: All Works  Site Specific UXO Awareness Briefings to all personnel conducting intrusive works.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 II Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

Glossary

Abbreviation Definition AA Anti-Aircraft AFS Auxiliary Fire Service AP Anti-Personnel ARP Air Raid Precautions AWAS Air Warfare Analysis Section DA Delay-action EOC Explosive Ordnance Clearance EOD Explosive Ordnance Disposal FP Fire Pot GM G Mine (Parachute mine) HAA Heavy Anti-Aircraft HE High Explosive IB Incendiary Bomb LAA Light Anti-Aircraft LCC London County Council LRRB Long Range Rocket Bomb (V-2) LSA Land Service Ammunition MOL Molotov (Incendiary Bomb) OB Oil Bomb PAC Pilotless Aircraft (V-1) PB Phosphorous Bomb PM Parachute Mine POW Prisoner Of War RAF Royal Air Force RCAF Royal Canadian Air Force RFC Royal Flying Corps RNAS Royal Naval Air Service ROF Royal Ordnance Factory SA Small Arms SAA Small Arms Ammunition SD1000 1,000kg high explosive bomb SD2 Anti-personnel “Butterfly Bomb” SIP Self-Igniting Phosphorous U/C Unclassified bomb UP Unrotated Projectile (rocket) USAAF United States Army Air Force UX Unexploded UXAA Unexploded Anti-Aircraft UXB Unexploded Bomb UXO Unexploded Ordnance V-1 Flying Bomb (Doodlebug) V-2 Long Range Rocket WAAF Women’s Auxiliary Air Force X Exploded

Report Reference: DA7268-00 III Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

Contents Executive Summary ...... II Glossary ...... III Contents...... IV Annexes ...... VI 1. Introduction ...... 1 1.1. Background ...... 1 2. Method Statement ...... 2 2.1. Report Objectives...... 2 2.2. Risk Assessment Process ...... 2 2.3. Sources of Information ...... 2 2.4. General Considerations of Historical Research ...... 3 3. Background to Bombing Records ...... 3 4. Background to Allied Records ...... 3 5. UK Regulatory Environment ...... 4 5.1. General ...... 4 5.2. CDM Regulations 2015 ...... 4 5.3. The 1974 Health and Safety at Work etc. Act ...... 4 5.4. Additional Legislation ...... 4 6. Role of Commercial UXO Contractors and The Authorities ...... 5 6.1. Commercial UXO Contractors ...... 5 6.2. The Authorities ...... 5 7. The Site ...... 6 7.1. Site Location ...... 6 7.2. Site Description ...... 6 8. Scope of the Proposed Works ...... 6 8.1. General ...... 6 9. Ground Conditions ...... 6 9.1. General Geology ...... 6 9.2. Site Specific Geology ...... 6 10. Site History ...... 7 10.1. Introduction ...... 7 10.2. Ordnance Survey Historical Maps ...... 7 11. Aerial Bombing Introduction ...... 7 11.1. General ...... 7 11.2. Generic Types of WWII German Aerial-delivered Ordnance ...... 7 11.3. Failure Rate of German Aerial-delivered Ordnance ...... 8 11.4. V-Weapons ...... 8 12. UXB Ground Penetration ...... 9 12.1. General ...... 9 12.2. The J-Curve Effect ...... 9 12.3. WWII UXB Penetration Studies ...... 9 12.4. Site Specific Bomb Penetration Considerations ...... 9 13. Initiation of Unexploded Ordnance ...... 10

Report Reference: DA7268-00 IV Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

13.1. General ...... 10 13.2. UXB Initiation Mechanisms...... 10 13.3. Effects of Detonation ...... 10 14. The Risk from German Aerial Delivered UXBs ...... 11 14.1. World War I ...... 11 14.2. World War II Bombing of Ongar ...... 11 14.3. WWII Home Office Bombing Statistics ...... 12 14.4. Essex ARP Message Forms ...... 12 14.5. WWII-Era Aerial Photography ...... 12 14.6. Abandoned Bombs...... 13 14.7. Bomb Disposal Tasks ...... 13 14.8. Evaluation of German Aerial Delivered UXB Risk ...... 14 15. The Risk from Allied Ordnance ...... 15 15.1. General ...... 15 15.2. Defending the UK From Aerial Attack ...... 15 15.3. Anti-Aircraft Artillery (AAA) ...... 16 15.4. Evaluation of Allied Ordnance Risk ...... 17 16. Ordnance Clearance and Post-WWII Ground Works ...... 18 16.1. General ...... 18 16.2. UXO Clearance ...... 18 16.3. Post-war Redevelopment ...... 18 17. 1st Line Defence Risk Assessment ...... 19 17.1. Risk Assessment Stages ...... 19 17.2. Assessed Risk Level ...... 21 18. Proposed Risk Mitigation Methodology ...... 21 18.1. General ...... 21 Bibliography ...... 22

Report Reference: DA7268-00 V Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

Annexes

List of Report Annexes

Annex A Site Location Maps

Annex B Recent Aerial Photography

Annex C Client Provided Site Plan

Annex D Pre and Post-WWII Historical Maps

Annex E Example of UXO Entry Holes

Annex F Examples of German Aerial Delivered Ordnance

Annex G Examples of UXO Incidents

Annex H WWI Map of Air Raids and Naval Bombardments

Annex I 1948 RAF Aerial Photography of the Site

Annex J Luftwaffe Reconnaissance Imagery

Annex K Examples of Anti-Aircraft Projectiles

Report Reference: DA7268-00 VI Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

1st Line Defence Limited Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Risk Assessment

Site: Green Earth Management Ltd Client: The Nags Head, Moreton

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

1st Line Defence has been commissioned by Green Earth Management Ltd to conduct a Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Risk Assessment for the proposed works at The Nags Head, Moreton site.

Buried UXO can present a significant risk to construction works and development projects. The discovery of a suspect device during works can cause considerable disruption to operations as well as cause unwanted delays and expense.

UXO in the UK can originate from three principal sources:

1. Munitions resulting from wartime activities including German bombing in WWI and WWII, long range shelling, and defensive activities. 2. Munitions deposited as a result of military training and exercises. 3. Munitions lost, burnt, buried or otherwise discarded either deliberately, accidentally, or ineffectively.

This report will assess the potential factors that may contribute to the risk of UXO contamination. If an elevated risk is identified at the site, this report will recommend appropriate mitigation measures, in order to reduce the risk to as low as is reasonably practicable. Detailed analysis and evidence will be provided to ensure an understanding of the basis for the assessed risk level and any recommendations.

This report complies with the guidelines outlined in CIRIA C681, ‘Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) A Guide for the Construction Industry’.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 1 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

2. Method Statement

2.1. Report Objectives

The aim of this report is to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the potential risk from UXO at The Nags Head, Moreton site. The report will also recommend appropriate site and work-specific risk mitigation measures to reduce the risk from explosive ordnance during the envisaged works to a level that is as low as reasonably practicable.

2.2. Risk Assessment Process

1st Line Defence has undertaken a five-step process for assessing the risk of UXO contamination:

1. The risk that the site was contaminated with UXO. 2. The risk that UXO remains on the site. 3. The risk that UXO may be encountered during the proposed works. 4. The risk that UXO may be initiated. 5. The consequences of initiating or encountering UXO.

In order to address the above, 1st Line Defence has taken into consideration the following factors:

 Evidence of WWI and WWII German aerial delivered bombing as well as the legacy of Allied occupation.  The nature and conditions of the site during WWII.  The extent of post-war development and UXO clearance operations on site.  The scope and nature of the proposed works and the maximum assessed bomb penetration depth.  The nature of ordnance that may have contaminated the proposed site area.

2.3. Sources of Information

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that relevant evidence has been consulted and presented in order to produce a thorough and comprehensible report for the client. To achieve this the following, which includes military records and archive material held in the public domain, have been accessed:

 The National Archives, Kew, and the Essex Record Office.  Historical mapping datasets.  Historic England National Monuments Record.  Relevant information supplied by Green Earth Management Ltd.  Available material from 33 Engineer Regiment (EOD) Archive.  1st Line Defence’s extensive historical archives, library and UXO geo-datasets.  Open sources such as published books and internet resources.

Research involved a visit to the Essex Record Office and The National Archives.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 2 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

2.4. General Considerations of Historical Research

This desktop assessment is based largely upon analysis of historical evidence. Every reasonable effort has been made to locate and present significant and pertinent information. 1st Line Defence cannot be held accountable for any changes to the assessed risk level or risk mitigation measures, based on documentation or other data that may come to light at a later date, or which was not available to 1st Line Defence during the production of this report.

It is often problematic and sometimes impossible to verify the completeness and accuracy of WWII- era records. As a consequence, conclusions as to the exact location and nature of a UXO risk can rarely be quantified and are to a degree subjective. To counter this, a range of sources have been consulted and analysed. The same methodology is applied to each report during the risk assessment process. 1st Line Defence cannot be held responsible for any inaccuracies or the incompleteness in available historical information.

3. Background to Bombing Records

During WWII bombing records were gathered by the police, Air Raid Precaution (ARP) wardens and military personnel. Records were maintained in the form of local and regional written records, maps depicting the locations of individual strikes, and maps indicating the levels of damage sustained by structures. Records typically documented when, where and what types of bombs had fallen during an air raid. Records of bomb strikes were made either through direct observation or by post-raid surveys. The immediate priority was focused on assisting casualties and minimising damage. As a result some records were incomplete and contradictory.

The quality, detail and nature of record keeping could vary considerably between boroughs and towns. No two areas identically collated or recorded data. While some local authorities maintained records with a methodical approach, sources in certain areas can be considerably more vague, dispersed, and narrower in scope. Many records were even damaged or destroyed in subsequent bombing raids. Records of raids that took place on sparsely or uninhabited areas were often based upon third party or hearsay information and are therefore not always reliable. Furthermore, records of attacks on military or strategic targets were often maintained separately from the general records and have not always survived.

4. Background to Allied Records

During WWII considerable areas of land were requisitioned by the army for the purpose of defence, training, and the construction of airfields and facilities for munitions production. Records relating to military features vary and some may remain censored. Within urban environments datasets will be consulted detailing the location of munition production as well as air and land defences. In rural locations it may be possible to obtain plans of airfields and military establishments, as well as operational training logs, plans and personal memoirs.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 3 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

5. UK Regulatory Environment

5.1. General

There is no formal obligation requiring a UXO risk assessment to be undertaken for construction projects in the UK, nor is there any specific legislation stipulating the management or mitigation of UXO risk. However, it is implicit in the legislation outlined below that those responsible for intrusive works (archaeology, site investigation, drilling, piling, excavation etc.) should undertake a comprehensive and robust assessment of the potential risks to employees and that mitigation measures are implemented to address any identified hazards.

5.2. CDM Regulations 2015

The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015) define the responsibilities of parties involved in the construction of temporary or permanent structures.

The CDM 2015 establishes a duty of care extending from clients, principle co-ordinators, designers, and contractors to those working on, or affected by, a project. Those responsible for construction projects may therefore be accountable for the personal or proprietary loss of third parties, if correct health and safety procedure has not been applied.

Although the CDM does not specifically reference UXO, the risk presented by such items is both within the scope and purpose of the legislation. It is therefore implied that there is an obligation on parties to:

 Provide an appropriate assessment of potential UXO risks at the site (or ensure such an assessment is completed by others).  Put in place appropriate risk mitigation measures if necessary.  Supply all parties with information relevant to the risks presented by the project.  Ensure the preparation of a suitably robust emergency response plan.

5.3. The 1974 Health and Safety at Work etc. Act

All employers have a responsibility under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, to ensure the health and safety of their employees and third parties, so far as is reasonably practicable and conduct suitable and sufficient risk assessments.

5.4. Additional Legislation

In the event of a casualty resulting from the failure of an employer/client to address the risks relating to UXO, the organisation may be criminally liable under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 4 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

6. Role of Commercial UXO Contractors and The Authorities

6.1. Commercial UXO Contractors

In the event that a risk of UXO contamination is detected at the proposed site, the support of a UXO specialist may be recommended. A UXO specialist may be able to avoid unnecessary call-outs to the authorities through the disposal or removal of low risk items. In addition a specialist will assist in the swift recognition of high risk items, and will thereafter co-ordinate with the local authority with the objective of causing minimal levels of disruption to site operations, whilst putting in place safe and appropriate measures.

For more information on the role of commercial UXO specialists, see CIRIA C681.

6.2. The Authorities

The police have a responsibility to co-ordinate the emergency services in the event of an ordnance- related incident at a construction site. Upon inspection they may impose a safety cordon, order an evacuation, and call the military authorities Joint Services Explosive Ordnance Disposal (JSEOD) to arrange for investigation and/or disposal. In the absence of a UXO specialist, police officers will usually employ such precautionary safety measures, thereby causing works to cease, and possibly requiring the evacuation of neighbouring businesses and properties.

The priority given to the police request will depend on JSEOD’s judgement of the nature of the UXO risk, the location, people and assets at risk, as well as the availability of resources. The speed of response varies; authorities may respond immediately or in some cases it may take several days for the item of ordnance to be dealt with.

Depending on the on-site risk assessment the item of ordnance may be removed from the site and/or destroyed by a controlled explosion. The latter process is lengthy and may necessitate the establishment of addition cordons and evacuations.

Following the removal of an item of UXO, the military authorities will only undertake further investigations or clearances in high risk situations. If there are regular UXO finds on a site the JSEOD may not treat each occurrence as an emergency and will recommend the construction company puts in place alternative procedures, such as the appointment of a commercial contractor to manage the situation.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 5 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

7. The Site

7.1. Site Location

The site is located in the village of Moreton, Essex.

A site for mobile homes forms the northern boundary, while the Moreton C of E Primary School borders to the east. Church Road, The Nags Head, and residential property border to the south, while allotment gardens define the western boundary.

The site is approximately centred on the OS grid reference: TL 5341007046.

Site location maps are presented in Annex A.

7.2. Site Description

The boundary comprises areas an accessway and areas of vacant hardstanding to the rear of The Nags Head public house.

A recent aerial photograph and site plan are presented in Annex B and Annex C respectively.

8. Scope of the Proposed Works

8.1. General

The precise nature of proposed works are currently unknown. If required these can be incorporated into the report at a later date.

9. Ground Conditions

9.1. General Geology

The British Geological Survey (BGS) map shows the bedrock geology of the site to be underlain by the London Clay Formation – clay, silt and sand, of the Palaeogene Period. The superficial deposits are comprised of Kesgrave Catchment Subgroup – sand and gravel of the Quaternary Period.

9.2. Site Specific Geology

Site specific geotechnical data was not available during the production of this report.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 6 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

10. Site History

10.1. Introduction

The purpose of this section is to identify the composition of the site pre and post-WWII. It is important to establish the historical use of the site, as this may indicate the site’s relation to potential sources of UXO as well as help with determining factors such as the land use, groundcover, likely frequency of access and signs of bomb damage.

10.2. Ordnance Survey Historical Maps

Relevant historical maps were obtained for this report and are presented in Annex D. See below for a summary of the site history shown on acquired mapping.

WWI Period Date Scale Description The site is shown to comprise vacant land to the rear of The Nags Head public 1920 1:2,500 house and an unnamed school.

Post-WWII Date Scale Description Little change is evident on or immediately adjacent to the site, further than the 1973 1:2,500 expansion of the aforementioned school.

11. Aerial Bombing Introduction

11.1. General

During WWI and WWII, many towns and cities across the UK were subjected to bombing which often resulted in extensive damage to city centres, docks, rail infrastructure and industrial areas. The poor accuracy of WWII targeting technology and the nature of bombing techniques often resulted in neighbouring areas to targets sustaining collateral damage.

In addition to raids which concentrated on specific targets, indiscriminate bombing of large areas also took place, this occurred most prominently in the London ‘Blitz’, though affected many other towns and cities. As discussed in the following sections, a proportion of the bombs dropped on the UK did not detonate as designed. Although extensive efforts were made to locate and deal with these UXBs at the time, many still remain buried and can present a potential risk to construction projects.

The main focus of research for this report will concern German aerial delivered weapons dropped during WWII, although WWI bombing will also be considered.

11.2. Generic Types of WWII German Aerial-delivered Ordnance

An understanding of the type and characteristics of the ordnance used by the Luftwaffe during WWII allows an informed assessment of the hazards posed by any unexploded items that may remain in situ on a site. Images and brief summaries of the characteristics of the above listed German aerial delivered ordnance are presented in Annex E.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 7 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

Generic Types of WWII German Aerial Delivered Ordnance Type Frequency Likelihood of detection

High Explosive In terms of weight of ordnance Although efforts were made to identify the presence of unexploded ordnance (HE) bombs dropped, HE bombs were the most following an air raid, often the damage and destruction caused by detonated frequently deployed by the Luftwaffe bombs made observation of UXB entry holes impossible. The entry hole of an during WWII. unexploded bomb can be as little as 20cm in diameter and was easily overlooked in certain ground conditions (see Annex F). Furthermore, ARP documents describe the danger of assuming that damage, actually caused by a large UXB, was due to an exploded 50kg bomb. UXBs therefore present the greatest risk to present–day intrusive works.

Aerial or There were deployed less frequently If functioning correctly, PMs generally would have had a slow rate of descent Parachute mines than HE and IBs due to size, cost and the and were very unlikely to have penetrated the ground. Where the parachute (PM) difficulty of deployment. failed, mines would have simply shattered on impact if the main charge failed to explode. There have been extreme cases when these items have been found unexploded. However, in these scenarios, the ground was either extremely soft or the munition fell into water.

1kg Incendiary In terms of the number of weapons IBs had very limited penetration capability and in urban areas would often have bombs (IB) dropped, small IBs were the most been located in post-raid surveys. If they failed to initiate and fell in water, on numerous. Millions of these were soft vegetated ground, or bombed rubble, they could have gone unnoticed. dropped throughout WWII.

Large Incendiary These were not as common as the 1kg If large IBs did penetrate the ground, complete combustion did not always occur bombs (IB) IBs, although they were more and in such cases they could remain a risk to intrusive works. frequently deployed than PMs and AP bomblets.

Anti-personnel These were not commonly used and are SD2 bomblets were packed into containers holding between 6 and 108 (AP) bomblets generally considered to pose a low risk submunitions. They had little ground penetration ability and should have been to most works in the UK. located by the post-raid survey unless they fell into water, dense vegetation or bomb rubble.

11.3. Failure Rate of German Aerial-delivered Ordnance

It has been estimated that 10% of WWII German aerial delivered HE bombs failed to explode as designed. Reasons for why such weapons might have failed to function as designed include:

 Malfunction of the fuze or gain mechanism (manufacturing fault, sabotage by forced labour or faulty installation).  Many were fitted with a clockwork mechanism that could become immobilised on impact.  Failure of the bomber aircraft to arm the bombs due to human error or an equipment defect.  Jettisoning the bomb before it was armed or from a very low altitude. This most likely occurred if the bomber aircraft was under attack or crashing.

From 1940 to 1945 bomb disposal teams dealt with a total of 50,000 explosive items of 50kg, over, 7,000 anti-aircraft projectiles and 300,000 beach mines. Unexploded ordnance is still regularly encountered across the UK, see press articles in Annex G.

11.4. V-Weapons

Hitler’s ‘V-weapon’ campaign began from mid-1944. It used newly developed unmanned cruise missiles and rockets. The V-1 known as the flying bomb or pilotless aircraft and the V-2, a long range rocket, were launched from bases in Germany and occupied Europe. A total of 9,251 V-1s and 1,115 V-2s were recorded in the United Kingdom.

Although these weapons caused considerable damage their relatively low numbers allowed accurate records of strikes to be maintained. These records have mostly survived. There is a negligible risk from unexploded V-weapons on land today since even if the 1000kg warhead failed to explode, the weapons are so large that they would have been observed and the risk dealt with at the time. Therefore, V-weapons are referenced in this report not as a viable risk factor, but primarily in order to help account for evidence of damage and clearance reported.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 8 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

The risk from V-weapons in Essex is therefore considered negligible and will not be further addressed in this report.

12. UXB Ground Penetration

12.1. General

An important consideration when assessing the risk from a UXB is the likely maximum depth of burial. There are several factors which determine the depth that an unexploded bomb will penetrate:

 Mass and shape of bomb.  Height of release.  Velocity and angle of bomb.  Nature of the ground cover.  Underlying geology. Geology is perhaps the most important variable. If the ground is soft, there is a greater potential of deeper penetration. For example, peat and alluvium are easier to penetrate than gravel and sand, whereas layers of hard strata will significantly retard and may stop the trajectory of a UXB.

12.2. The J-Curve Effect

J-curve is the term used to describe the characteristic curve commonly followed by an aerial delivered bomb dropped from height after it penetrates the ground. Typically, as the bomb is slowed by its passage through underlying soils, its trajectory curves towards the surface. Many UXBs are found with their nose cone pointing upwards as a result of this effect. More importantly however is the resulting horizontal offset from the point of entry. This is typically a distance of about one third of the bomb’s penetration depth, but can be up to 15m.

12.3. WWII UXB Penetration Studies

During WWII the Ministry of Home Security undertook a major study on actual bomb penetration depths, carrying out statistical analysis on the measured depths of 1,328 bombs as reported by bomb disposal (BD) teams. Conclusions were made as to the likely average and maximum depths of penetration of different sized bombs in different geological strata.

For example, the largest common German bomb (500kg) had a likely concluded penetration depth of 6m in sand or gravel but 11m in clay. The maximum observed depth for a 500kg bomb was 11.4m and for a 1,000kg bomb 12.8m. Theoretical calculations suggested that significantly greater penetration depths were probable.

12.4. Site Specific Bomb Penetration Considerations

When considering an assessment of the bomb penetration at the site of proposed works the following parameters have been used:

 WWII geology – London Clay Formation.  Impact angle and velocity – 10-15° from vertical and 270 metres per second.  Bomb mass and configuration – The 500kg SC HE bomb, without retarder units or armour piercing nose (this was the largest of the common bombs used against Britain).

Report Reference: DA7268-00 9 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

It has not been possible to determine maximum bomb penetration capabilities at this stage due to the lack or limitations of site specific borehole geotechnical information. An assessment can be made once such information becomes available or by an UXO Specialist on-site.

13. Initiation of Unexploded Ordnance

13.1. General

Unexploded ordnance does not spontaneously explode. All high explosive filling requires significant energy to create the conditions for detonation to occur. In the case of unexploded German bombs discovered within the construction site environment, there are a number of potential initiation mechanisms.

13.2. UXB Initiation Mechanisms

UXB Initiation Direct Impact Unless the fuze or fuze pocket is struck, there needs to be a significant impact e.g. from piling or large and violent mechanical excavation, onto the main body of the weapon to initiate a buried iron bomb. Such violent action can cause the bomb to detonate. Re- starting the A small proportion of German WWII bombs employed clockwork fuzes. It is probable Clockwork Fuze that significant corrosion would have taken place within the fuze mechanism over the last 70+ years that would prevent clockwork mechanisms from functioning. Nevertheless, it was reported that the clockwork fuze in a UXB dealt with by 33 EOD Regiment in Surrey in 2002 did re-start. Friction Impact The most likely scenario resulting in the detonation of a UXB is friction impact initiating the shock-sensitive fuze explosive. The combined effects of seasonal changes in temperature and general degradation over time can cause explosive compounds to crystallise and extrude out from the main body of the bomb. It may only require a limited amount of energy to initiate the extruded explosive which could detonate the main charge.

Annex G2 details incidents where intrusive works have caused items of UXO to detonate, resulting in death or injury and damage to plant.

13.3. Effects of Detonation

When considering the potential consequences of a detonation, it is necessary to identify the significant receptors that may be affected. The receptors that may potentially be at risk from a UXO detonation on a construction site will vary depending on the site specific conditions but can be summarised as follows:

 People – site workers, local residents and general public.  Plant and equipment – construction plant on site.  Services – subsurface gas, electricity, telecommunications.  Structures – not only visible damage to above ground buildings, but potentially damage to foundations and the weakening of support structures.  Environment – introduction of potentially contaminating materials.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 10 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

14. The Risk from German Aerial Delivered UXBs

14.1. World War I

During WWI Britain was targeted and bombed by Zeppelin Airships as well as Gotha and Giant fixed- wing aircraft. A WWI map of air raids and naval bombardments across England is presented in Annex H. This source does not record any WWI bombing incidents to have affected the site.

WWI bombs were generally smaller than those used in WWII and were dropped from a lower altitude. This resulted in limited UXB penetration depths. Aerial bombing was often such a novelty at the time that it attracted public interest and even spectators to watch the raids in progress. For these reasons there is a limited risk that UXBs passed undiscovered in the urban environment. When combined with the relative infrequency of attacks and an overall low bombing density the risk from WWI UXBs is considered low and will not be further addressed in this report.

14.2. World War II Bombing of Ongar

The Luftwaffe’s main objective for the attacks on Britain was to inhibit the country’s economic and military capability. To achieve this they targeted airfields, depots, docks, warehouses, wharves, railway lines, factories, and power stations. As the war progressed the Luftwaffe bombing campaign expanded to include the indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas in an attempt to subvert public morale.

During WWII the site was located within the Ongar Rural District, which sustained a low-moderate density of bombing according to Home Office statistics. Given the lack of significant industrial works or densely populated civilian centres, bombing in the region is largely attributable to targeting of the various airfields in the vicinity as well as RAF airfield decoys. These include RAF North Weald, which while situated in the Epping RD bordered Ongar immediately to the west, which sustained frequent raids in which high numbers of bombs were dropped. The vast majority of the region saw very little bombing during WWII.

Records of bombing incidents in the civilian areas of Essex were collected by the Air Raid Precautions wardens and collated by the Civil Defence Office. Some other organisations, such as port and railway authorities, maintained separate records. Records would be in the form of typed or hand written incident notes, maps and statistics. Bombing data was carefully analysed, not only due to the requirement to identify those parts of the country most needing assistance, but also in an attempt to find patterns in the Germans’ bombing strategy in order to predict where future raids might take place.

Records of bombing incidents for the Ongar Rural District are presented in the following sections.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 11 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

14.3. WWII Home Office Bombing Statistics

The following table summarises the quantity of German aerial delivered bombs (excluding 1kg incendiaries and anti-personnel bombs) dropped on the Ongar Rural District between 1940 and 1945.

Record of German Ordnance Dropped on the Ongar Rural District Area Acreage 47,236 High Explosive bombs (all types) 1,009 Parachute mines 70

Oil bombs 82 Phosphorus bombs 67 Weapons Fire pots 12 Pilotless aircraft (V-1) 12 Long range rocket bombs (V-2) 43 Total 1,318 Number of Items per 1,000 acres 27.9 Source: Home Office Statistics This table does not include UXO found during or after WWII.

Detailed records of the quantity and locations of the 1kg incendiary and anti-personnel bombs were not routinely maintained by the authorities as they were frequently too numerous to record. Although the risk relating to IBs is lesser than that relating to larger HE bombs, they were similarly designed to inflict damage and injury. Anti-personnel bombs were used in much smaller quantities and are rarely found today but are potentially more dangerous. Although Home Office statistics were not recorded, both types of item should not be overlooked when assessing the general risk to personnel and equipment.

14.4. Essex ARP Message Forms

Air Raid Precautions (ARP) Message forms for the Western Region of Essex, within which the Ongar Rural District was located, were accessed at the Essex Record Office. The message forms are notes of correspondence during WWII relating to ARP activity, including noting and the response to bombing incidents. The forms were checked for any reference to the site or the immediate vicinity, however none were encountered.

14.5. WWII-Era Aerial Photography

A high resolution scan of WWII-era aerial photography for the site area was obtained from the National Monuments Record Office (Historic England). This photograph provides a record of the potential composition of the site during the war, as well as its condition immediately following the war (see Annex I).

WWII-Era Aerial Photography Date Description The site can be seen to be primarily undeveloped, consisting of what appear to be disused 26th July 1948 grassy areas. Residential and commercial development border immediately to the south.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 12 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

14.6. Abandoned Bombs

A post air-raid survey of buildings, facilities, and installations would have included a search for evidence of bomb entry holes. If evidence of an entry hole was encountered, Bomb Disposal Officer Teams would normally have been requested to attempt to locate, render safe, and dispose of the bomb. Occasionally, evidence of UXBs was discovered but due to a relatively benign position, access problems, or a shortage of resources the UXB could not be exposed and rendered safe. Such an incident may have been recorded and noted as an ‘abandoned bomb’.

Given the inaccuracy of WWII records and the fact that these bombs were ‘abandoned’, their locations cannot be considered definitive or the lists exhaustive. The MoD states that ‘action to make the devices safe would be taken only if it was thought they were unstable’. It should be noted that other than the ‘officially’ abandoned bombs, there will inevitably be UXBs that were never recorded.

1st Line Defence holds no records of officially registered abandoned bombs at or near the site of the proposed works.

14.7. Bomb Disposal Tasks

The information service from the Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Archive Information Office at 33 Engineer Regiment (EOD) is currently facing considerable delay. It has therefore not been possible to include any updated official information regarding bomb disposal/clearance tasks with regards to this site. A database of known disposal/clearance tasks has been referred to which does not make reference to such instances occurring within the site of proposed works. If any relevant information is received at a later date Green Earth Management Ltd will be advised.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 13 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

14.8. Evaluation of German Aerial Delivered UXB Risk

Factors Conclusion Density of Bombing During WWII the site was situated within the Ongar Rural District, which It is important to consider the bombing sustained a low density of bombing according to Home Office statistics, density when assessing the possibility with an average of 27.9 items recorded per 1,000 acres. The site nor that UXBs remain in an area. High levels the wider village appear to have sustained any frequent bombing or of bombing density could allow for error specific targeting. No reference to bombing has been encountered in record keeping due to extreme within a relevant proximity within ARP message forms or available damage caused to the area. anecdotal information. The closest reference to bombing occurred at Moreton Bridge, which extends from 300m to the south to 1km to the south-east.

Damage No evidence of bomb damage, such as cratering or ground If buildings or structures on a site disturbances, are visible on site or in the immediate area within WWII- sustained bomb or fire damage any era aerial imagery. resulting rubble and debris could have obscured the entry holes of unexploded bombs dropped during the same, or later, raids. Similarly, a High Explosive bomb strike in an area of open agricultural land will have caused soil disturbance, increasing the risk that a UXB entry hole would be overlooked. Access Frequency While the site was primarily undeveloped during WWII, residential and UXO in locations where access was commercial premises – including The Nags Head public house – irregular would have a greater chance of bordered immediately to the south. The likely novelty of raids/bombing passing unnoticed than at those that in the immediate area indicates that had bombing occurred, were regularly occupied. The importance particularly within close proximity to the village, post-raid checks for of a site to the war effort is also an UXO would have taken place with evidence of such items noticed and important consideration as such sites are recorded. likely to have been both frequently visited and subject to post-raid checks for evidence of UXO. Ground Cover The site consisted of open ground during WWII. While evidence of UXO The nature of the ground cover present has the potential to become obscured within such ground cover, this is during WWII would have a substantial considered to be offset by the proximity of residential and commercial influence on any visual indication that structures, as well as the likely novelty of raids in the vicinity. may indicate UXO being present. Bomb Failure Rate There is no evidence to suggest that the bomb failure rate in the locality of the site would have been dissimilar to the 10% normally used.

Abandoned Bombs 1st Line Defence holds no records of abandoned bombs at or within the site vicinity.

Bombing Decoy sites 1st Line Defence could find no evidence of bombing decoy sites within the site vicinity.

Bomb Disposal Tasks 1st Line Defence could find no evidence of bomb disposal tasks within the site boundary and immediate area.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 14 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

15. The Risk from Allied Ordnance

15.1. General

The potential risk of encountering Allied ordnance on construction sites is particularly elevated in areas previously associated with military activity. This includes munitions deposited by military training exercises, dumped as a result of poor working practices, or deliberately placed to prevent adversary occupation and from other home defence activities. For example, contamination from items of Land Service (LSA) and Small Arms Ammunition (SAA) may result from historical occupation of an area or its use for military training.

It should be highlighted that there is no evidence that the site formerly had any military occupation or usage that could have led to contamination with such items of Allied ordnance. Despite this, urban areas such as the location of the site, can however be at risk from buried unexploded Anti-Aircraft projectiles fired during WWII – as addressed below.

15.2. Defending the UK From Aerial Attack

During WWII the Ministry of Defence employed a number of defence tactics against the Luftwaffe from bombing major towns, cities, manufacturing areas, ports and airfields. These can be divided into passive and active defences (examples are provided in the table below).

Active Defences Passive Defences  Anti-aircraft gun emplacements to engage  Blackouts and camouflaging to hinder the enemy aircraft. identification of Luftwaffe targets.  Fighter aircraft to act as interceptors.  Decoy sites were located away from targets  Rockets and missiles were used later during and used dummy buildings and lighting to WWII. replicate urban, military, or industrial areas.  Barrage balloons forced enemy aircraft to greater altitudes.  Searchlights were often used to track and divert adversary bomber crews during night raids.

Active defences such as anti-aircraft artillery present a greater risk of UXO contamination than passive defences. Unexploded ordnance resulting from dogfights and fighter interceptors is rarely encountered and difficult to accurately qualify.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 15 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

15.3. Anti-Aircraft Artillery (AAA)

During WWII three main types of gun sites existed: heavy anti-aircraft (HAA), light anti-aircraft (LAA) and ‘Z’ batteries (ZAA). If the projectiles and rockets fired from these guns failed to explode or strike an aircraft they would descend back to land. The table below provides further information on the operation and ordnance associated with these type of weapons.

Anti-Aircraft Artillery Item Description HAA These large calibre guns such as the 3.7” QF (Quick Firing) were used to engage high flying enemy bombers., They often fired large HE projectiles, which were usually initiated by integral fuzes triggered by impact, area, time delay or a combination of aforementioned mechanisms. The closest HAA was located approximately 4.1km west of the site, however the range of a projectile can be up to 15km. LAA These mobile guns were intended to engage fast, low flying aircraft. They were typically rotated between locations on the perimeters of towns and strategically important industrial works. As they could be moved to new positions with relative ease when required, records of their locations are limited. The most numerous of these were the 40mm Bofors gun which could fire up to 120 x 40mm HE projectiles per minute to over 1,800m. Variations in HAA Gun type Calibre Shell Weight Shell Dimensions and LSA 3.0 Inch 76mm 7.3kg 76mm x 356mm Ammunition 3.7 Inch 94mm 12.7kg 94mm x 438mm 4.5 Inch 114mm 24.7kg 114mm x 578mm 40mm 40mm 0.9kg 40mm x 311mm Z-AA The three inch unrotated rocket/projectile known as the UP-3 had initially been developed for the Royal Navy. The UP-3 was also used in ground-based single and 128-round launchers known as ‘‘Z’’ batteries. The rocket, containing a high explosive warhead was often propelled by cordite.

29mm Spigot This was an infantry anti-tank weapon. A heavy steel rod (spigot) would be driven Mortars (Blacker into the hollow tail of a projectile to ignite the explosive charge located in the rear Bombards) of the projectile, and lead to it being propelled toward a target. It was not an effective method of air defence and was mainly used in defensive positons at key locations. If encountered, a spigot mortar projectile will resemble a mortar round, but with an elongated metal tail rod. Quick Firing (QF) 1 QF 1 and 2 Pounders, or ‘pom poms’ were a light battery most often used by the and 2 Pounder navy. During the beginning of WWII they were used to defend targets in the absence of more effective LAA or HAA. Machine Gun These were established at some significant military and industrial positions. Posts Machine guns were a largely ineffective form of AAA. Machine guns usually fired the .303 Round.

The conditions in which an HAA or LAA projectiles may have fallen unnoticed within a site area are analogous to those regarding aerial delivered ordnance. For detailed analysis on the ground conditions and access frequency within the proposed site, see the evaluation of German Bombing Records in, Section 14.9.

Illustrations of Anti-Aircraft artillery, projectiles and rockets are presented at Annex J.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 16 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

15.4. Evaluation of Allied Ordnance Risk

1st Line Defence has considered the following potential sources of Allied ordnance contamination:

Sources of Contamination Conclusion Military Camps 1st Line Defence could find no evidence of a military camp Military camps present an elevated risk from ordnance within the site. simply due to the large military presence and likelihood of associated live ordnance training.

Anti-Aircraft Defences 1st Line Defence could find no evidence of Anti-Aircraft Anti-Aircraft defences were employed across the defences such as a HAA or LAA gun emplacement country. Proximity to anti-aircraft defences increases the occupying or bordering the site. The closest HAA was chance of encountering AA projectiles. located approximately 4.1km west of the site, however the range of a projectile can be up to 15km. The conditions in which HAA or LAA projectiles may have fallen unnoticed within a site footprint are analogous to those regarding German aerial delivered ordnance.

Home Guard Activity Evidence of Home Guard training areas and activities is st The Home Guard regularly undertook training and difficult to obtain. 1 Line Defence has no evidence of any ordnance practice in open areas, as well as burying Home Guard activities on the site. ordnance as part of anti-invasion defences.

Defensive Positions There is no evidence of any defensive features formerly Defensive positions suggest the presence of military located on or bordering the site footprint. activity, which is often indicative of ordnance storage, usage or disposal.

Training or firing ranges There is no evidence of such features affecting the site. Areas of ordnance training saw historical ordnance usage in large numbers, often with inadequate disposal of expended and live items. The presence of these ranges significantly impact on the risk of encountering items of ordnance in their vicinity.

Defensive Minefields There is no evidence of defensive minefields affecting the Minefields were placed in strategic areas to defend the site. country in the event of a German invasion. Minefields were not always cleared with an appropriate level of vigilance.

Ordnance Manufacture No information of ordnance being stored, produced, or Ordnance manufacture indicates an increased chance disposed of within the proposed site could be found. that items of ordnance were stored, or disposed of, within a location.

Military Related Airfields The site was not situated within the perimeters or vicinity Military airfields present an elevated risk from ordnance of a military airfield. simply due to the large military presence and likelihood of associated live ordnance training or bombing practice.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 17 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

16. Ordnance Clearance and Post-WWII Ground Works

16.1. General

It is important to consider the extent to which any explosive ordnance clearance (EOC) activities or extensive ground works have occurred on site. This may indicate previous ordnance contamination or reduce the risk that ordnance remains undiscovered.

16.2. UXO Clearance

1st Line Defence has no evidence that any official ordnance clearance operations have taken place on site. Note however that we have not received confirmation of this fact from 33 EOD Regiment.

16.3. Post-war Redevelopment

Post-war development has involved the concreting of the area in the present form. The risk from deep- buried unexploded bombs is only considered mitigated at locations where post war piling or deep foundations have taken place.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 18 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

17. 1st Line Defence Risk Assessment

17.1. Risk Assessment Stages

Taking into account the quality of the historical evidence, the assessment of the overall risk from unexploded ordnance is based on the following five considerations:

1. That the site was contaminated with unexploded ordnance. 2. That unexploded ordnance remains on site. 3. That such items will be encountered during the proposed works. 4. That ordnance may be initiated by the works operations. 5. The consequences of encountering or initiating ordnance.

UXO Risk Assessment Quality of the The research has evaluated pre- and post-WWII Ordnance Survey maps, WWII-era aerial Historical photography, ARP Message forms held at the Essex Record Office, and anecdotal Record information. While the record set is not particularly extensive, this is to be expected for areas in rural locations, particularly those with low bomb densities. As such, this record set has been considered adequate in providing a confident basis for an assessment of potential UXO contamination on site.

The Risk that After considering the following facts, 1st Line Defence has assessed that there is a Low the Site was Risk that items of unexploded German aerial delivered and anti-aircraft ordnance could Contaminated have fallen unrecorded within the site boundary. with UXO  During WWII the site was situated within the Ongar Rural District, which sustained a low density of bombing according to Home Office statistics, with an average of 27.9 items recorded per 1,000 acres. Neither the site nor the wider village appear to have sustained any frequent bombing or specific targeting by the Luftwaffe.  No reference to bombing has been encountered within a relevant proximity within ARP message forms or available anecdotal information. The closest reference to bombing occurred at Moreton Bridge, which extends from 300m to the south to 1km to the south-east, beyond the proximity considered relevant for potential UXO contamination.  While the site was primarily undeveloped during WWII, residential and commercial premises – including The Nags Head public house – bordered immediately to the south. The likely novelty of raids/bombing in the immediate area indicates that had bombing occurred, particularly within close proximity to the village, post-raid checks for UXO would have taken place with evidence of such items noticed and recorded.  The site consisted of open ground during WWII. While evidence of UXO has the potential to become obscured within such ground cover, this is considered to be offset by the proximity of residential and commercial structures, as well as the likely novelty of raids in the vicinity.  There is no evidence that the site formerly had any military occupation or usage that could have led to contamination with items of Allied ordnance, such as LSA and SAA. The conditions in which HAA or LAA projectiles may have fallen unnoticed within the site boundary are however analogous to those regarding aerial delivered ordnance.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 19 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

The Risk that Post-war development has involved the concreting of the area in the present form. UXO Remains The risk of UXO remaining is considered to have been mitigated at the location of and on Site down to the depth of post-war foundations and excavations.

The Risk that The most likely scenarios under which items of UXO could be encountered during UXO may be construction works is during piling, drilling operations or bulk excavations for basement Encountered levels. The risk of encountering will depend on the extent of the works, such as the during the numbers of boreholes/piles (if required) and the volume of the excavations. Works An aerial delivered bomb may come to rest at any depth between just below ground level and its maximum penetration depth. Consequently there is also a possibility that UXBs could be encountered during shallow excavations (for services or site investigations) into the original WWII ground level. There is not considered to be any significant risk of encountering UXO during works planned within the footprint and down to the depth of any post-war buildings/excavations. Beyond these depths and away from these areas, a risk of encounter could remain.

The Risk that The risk that UXO could be initiated if encountered will depend on its condition, how it is UXO may be found, and the energy with which it is struck. Certain construction activities such as piling Initiated and percussive drilling pose a greater risk of initiating UXO in comparison to machine excavation, where the force of impact is generally lower and the item is more likely to be observed. If a UXB is struck by piling or percussive drilling equipment, the force of the impact can be sufficient to detonate the main high explosive charge irrespective of the condition of the fuze or other components. Violent vibration might also impart enough energy to a chemical detonator for it to function, and there is a potential risk that clockwork fuzes could restart. If piling works are planned at The Nags Head, Moreton there is a potential risk that a UXB, if present, could be initiated. The risk of initiation is assessed to be lower for any shallow intrusive works planned.

The The repercussions of the inadvertent detonation of items of UXO during intrusive ground Consequences works are potentially severe, both in terms of human and financial cost. A serious risk to of life and limb, damage to plant and total site shutdown during follow-up investigations Encountering are potential outcomes. or Initiating If appropriate risk mitigation measures are undertaken, the chances of initiating an item Ordnance of UXO during ground works is comparatively low. The primary consequence of encounter of UXO will therefore be economic. This would be particularly notable in the case of sites with a high-profile or where it is necessary to evacuate the public from the surrounding area. A site may be closed from a few hours to a week with potentially significant cost in lost time. It should be noted that even the discovery of suspected or possible items of UXO during intrusive works (if handled solely through the authorities), may also involve loss of production. Generally, the first action of the police in most cases will be to isolate the locale whilst awaiting military assistance, even if this becomes unnecessary.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 20 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

17.2. Assessed Risk Level

Taking into consideration the findings of this study, 1st Line Defence has assessed that there is a Low Risk from German and anti-aircraft unexploded ordnance at the site of proposed works.

Low Risk

Risk Level Ordnance Type Negligible Low Medium High

German Unexploded HE Bombs 

German 1kg Incendiary Bombs 

Anti-Aircraft Artillery Projectiles 

Allied Military Land Service Ammunition (Grenades, Mortars etc.) 

18. Proposed Risk Mitigation Methodology

18.1. General

The following risk mitigation measures are recommended to support the proposed works at The Nags Head, Moreton site:

Type of Work Recommended Mitigation Measure All Works  Site Specific UXO Awareness Briefings to all personnel conducting intrusive works. As a minimum precaution, all personnel working on the site should be briefed on the basic identification of UXO and what to do in the event of encountering a suspect item. This should in the first instance be undertaken by a UXO Specialist. Posters and information on the risk of UXO can be held in the site office for reference.

In making this assessment and recommending these risk mitigation measures, if known, the works outlined in the ‘Scope of the Proposed Works’ section were considered. Should the planned works be modified or additional intrusive engineering works be considered, 1st Line Defence should be consulted to see if a re-assessment of the risk or mitigation recommendations is necessary.

1st Line Defence Limited 4th October 2018

This Report has been produced in compliance with the Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) C681 guidelines for the writing of Detailed UXO Risk Assessments.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 21 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

Bibliography

 Bates, H. E., Flying Bombs over England, Frogletts Publications Ltd., 1994  Dobinson, C., AA Command: Britain’s Anti-Aircraft Defences of the Second World War, Methuen., 2001  Fegan, T., The ‘Baby Killers’: German Air raids on Britain in the First World War, Leo Cooper Ltd., 2002  Fleischer, W., German Air-Dropped Weapons to 1945, Midland Publishing., 2004  Jappy, M. J., Danger UXB: The Remarkable Story of the Disposal of Unexploded Bombs during the Second World War, Channel 4 Books., 2001  Morris, J., German Air Raids on Britain: 1914 – 1918, The Naval & Military Press., 1993  Price, A., Blitz on Britain, The Bomber Attacks on the United Kingdom 1939 – 1945, Purnell Book Services Ltd., 1977  Ramsey, W., The Blitz Then and Now, Volume 1, Battle of Britain Prints International Ltd., 1987  Ramsey, W., The Blitz Then and Now, Volume 2, Battle of Britain Prints International Ltd., 1988  Ramsey, W., The Blitz Then and Now, Volume 3, Battle of Britain Prints International Ltd., 1990  Scofield, J., Modern Military Matters., Council for British Archaeology., 2004  Stone, K., et al., Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) A Guide For The Construction Industry (C681)., CIRIA, 2009  Whiting, C., Britain Under Fire: The Bombing of Britain’s Cities 1940-1945, Pen & Sword Books Ltd., 1999

Report Reference: DA7268-00 22 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited

Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment The Nags Head, Moreton Green Earth Management Ltd

This report has been prepared by 1st Line Defence Limited with all reasonable care and skill. The report contains historical data and information from third party sources. 1st Line Defence Limited has sought to verify the accuracy and comprehensiveness of this information where possible but cannot be held accountable for any inherent errors. Furthermore, whilst every reasonable effort has been made to locate and access all relevant historical information, 1st Line Defence cannot be held responsible for any changes to risk level or mitigation recommendations resulting from documentation or other information which may come to light at a later date.

This report was written by, is owned by and is copyrighted to 1st Line Defence Limited. It contains important 1st Line Defence information which is disclosed only for the purposes of the client’s evaluation and assessment of the project to which the report is about. The contents of this report shall not, in whole or in part be used for any other purpose apart from the assessment and evaluation of the project; be relied upon in any way by the person other than the client, be disclosed to any affiliate of the client’s company who is not required to know such information, nor to any third party person, organisation or government, be copied or stored in any retrieval system, be reproduced or transmitted in any form by photocopying or any optical, electronic, mechanical or other means, without prior written consent of the Managing Director, 1st Line Defence Limited, Unit 3, Maple Park, Essex Road, Hoddesdon EN11 0EX. Accordingly, no responsibility or liability is accepted by 1st Line Defence towards any other person in respect of the use of this report or reliance on the information contained within it, except as may be designated by law for any matter outside the scope of this report.

Report Reference: DA7268-00 23 Document Code: 16-2-2F-Ed04-Jan17 © 1st Line Defence Limited Site Location Maps Annex: A

Site

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd Approximate site boundary

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Google Maps Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 Recent Aerial Photography Annex: B

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd Approximate site boundary

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, TM Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Google Earth Mapping Services Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 Client Provided Site Plan Annex: C

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd Approximate site boundary

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Green Earth Management Ltd Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 1920 Historical Map Annex: D1

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd Approximate site boundary

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Landmark Maps Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 1973 Historical Map Annex: D2

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd Approximate site boundary

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Landmark Maps Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 Examples of German Air-Delivered Ordnance Annex: E1

SC 50kg High Explosive Bomb

Bomb Weight 40-54kg (88-119lb)

Explosive c25kg (55lb) Weight

Fuze Type Impact fuze/electro-mechanical time delay fuze

Bomb 1,090 x 280mm (42.9 x 11.0in) Dimensions

Body Diameter 200mm (7.87in)

Use Against lightly damageable materials, hangars, railway rolling stock, ammunition depots, light bridges and buildings up to three stories.

Remarks The smallest and most common conventional German bomb. Nearly 70% of bombs dropped on the UK were 50kg.

SC 250kg High Explosive Bomb

Bomb Weight 245-256kg (540-564lb)

Explosive 125-130kg (276-287lb) Weight

Fuze Type Electrical impact/mechanical time delay fuze.

Bomb 1640 x 512mm (64.57 x 20.16in) Dimensions

Body Diameter 368mm (14.5in) SC250 bomb being loaded onto German bomber Use Against railway installations, embankments, flyovers, underpasses, large buildings and below-ground installations.

Remarks It could be carried by almost all German bomber aircraft, and was used to notable effect by the Junkers Ju-87 Stuka (Sturzkampfflugzeug or dive-bomber).

SC 500kg High Explosive Bomb

Bomb Weight 480-520kg (1,058-1,146lb)

Explosive 250-260kg (551-573lb) Weight

Fuze Type Electrical impact/mechanical time delay fuze.

Bomb 1957 x 640mm (77 x 25.2in) Dimensions

Body Diameter 470mm (18.5in) 500kg bomb, Felixstowe beach, April 2008

Use Against fixed airfield installations, hangars, assembly halls, flyovers, underpasses, high-rise buildings and below-ground installations.

Remarks 40/60 or 50/50 Amatol TNT, trialene. Bombs recovered with Trialen filling have cylindrical paper wrapped pellets 1-15/16 in. in length and diameter forming

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Various sources Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 Examples of German Air-Delivered Ordnance Annex: E2

SD2 Anti-Personnel ‘Butterfly Bomb’

Bomb Weight 2kg (4.41lb)

Explosive 7.5oz (225 grams ) of Amatol surrounded by a Weight layer of bituminous composition.

Fuze Type 41 fuze (time) , 67 fuze (clockwork time delay) or 70 fuze (anti-handling device)

Body Diameter 3in (7.62 cm) diameter, 3.1in (7.874) long

Use Designed as an anti-personnel/ fragmentation weapon. They were delivered by air, being dropped in containers of 23-144 sub-munitions that opened at a predetermined height, thus scattering the bombs.

Remarks Very rare. First used against Ipswich in 1940, but were also dropped on Kingston upon Hull, Grimsby and Cleethorpes in June 1943, amongst various other targets in UK. As the bombs fell the outer case flicked open by springs which caused four light metal drogues with a protruding 5 inch steel cable to deploy in the form of a parachute & wind vane which armed the device as it span.

Parachute Mine (Luftmine B / LMB)

Bomb Weight Approx. 990kg (2176lb)

Explosive Approx. 705kg (1,554lb) Weight

Fuze Type Impact/ Time delay / hydrostatic pressure fuze

Dimensions 2.64m x 0.64m (3.04m with parachute housing)

Use Against civilian, military and industrial targets. Used as blast bombs and designed to detonate above ground level to maximise damage to a wider area.

Remarks Deployed a parachute when dropped in order to control its descent. Had the potential to destroy a whole street of housing in a 100m radius.

SC 1000kg

Bomb Weight 993-1027kg (2,189-2,264lb)

Explosive 530-620kg (1168-1367lb) Weight

Fuze Type Electrical impact/mechanical time delay fuze.

Filling Mixture of 40% amatol and 60% TNT, but when used as an anti-shipping bomb it was filled with Trialen 105, a mixture of 15% RDX, 70% TNT and 15% aluminium powder.

Bomb 2800 x 654mm (110 x 25.8in) Dimensions

Body Diameter 654mm (18.5in)

Use SC type bombs are General Purpose Bombs used primarily for general demolition work. Constructed of parallel walls with comparatively heavy noses. They are usually of three piece welded construction

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Various sources Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 German Incendiary Bombs Annex: E3

1kg Incendiary Bomb

Bomb Weight 1.0 and 1.3kg (2.2 and 2.9lb)

Explosive 680g (1.3lb) Thermite Weight 8-15gm Explosive Nitropenta

Fuze Type Impact fuze

Bomb 350 x 50mm (13.8 x 1.97in) Dimensions

Body Diameter 50mm (1.97in)

Use As incendiary – dropped in clusters against towns and industrial complexes

Remarks Magnesium alloy case. Sometimes fitted with high explosive charge. The body is a cylindrical alloy casting threaded internally at the nose to receive the fuze holder and fuze.

C50 A Incendiary Bomb

Bomb Weight c41kg (90.4lb)

Explosive 0.03kg (0.066lb) Weight

Incendiary 12kg (25.5lb) liquid filling with Filling phosphor igniters in glass phials. Benzine 85%; Phosphorus 4%; Pure Rubber 10%

Fuze Type Electrical impact fuze

Bomb 1,100 x 280mm (43.2 x 8in) Dimensions

Use Against all targets where an incendiary effect is required

Remarks Early fill was a phosphorous/carbon disulphide incendiary mixture

Flam C-250 Oil Bomb

Bomb Weight 125kg (276lb)

Explosive 1kg (2.2lb) Weight

Fuze Type Super-fast electrical impact fuze

Filling Mixture of 30% petrol and 70% crude oil

Bomb 1,650 x 512.2mm (65 x 20.2in) Dimensions

Body Diameter 368mm (14.5in)

Use Often used for surprise attacks on ground troops, against troop barracks and industrial installations. Thin casing – not designed for ground penetration

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Various sources Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 Unexploded Bomb Entry Hole Example Annex: F

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: The National Archives Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 Recent Unexploded Bomb Finds, UK Annex: G1

250kg HE bomb found in Bermondsey March 2015 250kg HE bomb found in Bethnal Green, Aug 2016

250kg HE bomb found in Bath, May 2016 50kg HE bomb found in Wembley, May 2015

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: BBC News Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 Examples of Unexpected Detonation of WWII Bombs Annex: G2

19th September 2013

1st March 2013

2nd June 2010

23rd October 2006

June 2006

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Various news sources Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 Examples of Land Service Ammunition finds in the UK Annex: G3

Land Service Ammunition (LSA) resulting from historic military activity is commonly encountered across the UK by the public and construction industry alike. Such finds are much more common in rural areas than in urban environments, and can often be anticipated in areas such as former RAF stations or ranges. However, many such items are encountered entirely by surprise where the landowner or developer has no knowledge of any previous military use of the land.

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Various news sources Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 WWI Map of Air Raids and Naval Bombardments Annex: H

Site

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: J. Morris, German Air Raids on Britain Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 RAF Aerial Photography 26th July 1948 Annex: I

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd Approximate site boundary

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: National Monuments Record Office (Historic England) Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 Examples of Anti-Aircraft Projectiles Annex: J

3.7 Inch QF Anti-Aircraft Projectile

Projectile 28lb (12.6 kg) Weight

Explosive 2.52lbs Weight

Fuze Type Mechanical Time Fuze

Dimensions 3.7in x 14.7in (94mm x 360mm)

Rate of Fire 10 to 20 rounds per minute

Use The 3.7in AA Mks 1-3 were the standard Heavy Anti-Aircraft guns of the British Army.

Ceiling 30,000ft to 59,000ft

40mm Bofors Projectile

Projectile 1.96lb (0.86kg) Weight

Explosive 300g (0.6lb) Weight

Fuze Type Impact Fuze

Rate of Fire 120 rounds per minute

Projectile 40 x 180mm Dimensions

Ceiling 23,000ft (7000m )

Remarks Light quick fire high explosive anti- aircraft projectile. Each projectile fitted with small tracer element. If no target hit, shell would explode when tracer burnt out. Designed to engage aircraft flying below 2,000ft

3in Unrotated Projectile (UP) Anti-Aircraft Rocket (“Z” Battery)

HE Projectile 3.4kg (7.6lb) Weight

Explosive 0.96kg (2.13lb) Weight

Filling High Explosive – TNT. Fitted with aerial burst fuzing

Dimensions of 236 x 83mm (9.29 x 3.25in) projectile

Remarks As a short range rocket-firing anti- aircraft weapon developed for the Royal Navy. It was used extensively by British ships during the early days of World War II. The UP was also used in ground-based single and 128-round launchers known as Z Batteries. Shell consists of a steel cylinder reduced in diameter at the base and threaded externally to screw into the shell ring of the rocket motor

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Various sources Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79 Annex:

1ST LINE DEFENCE Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road Hoddesdon Hertfordshire EN11 0EX Tel: 01992 245020

www.1stlinedefence.co.uk

Client: Green Earth Management Ltd

Project: The Nags Head, Moreton Unit 3, Maple Park Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. EN11 0EX Ref: DA7268-00 Source: Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 Produced by and Copyright to 1st Line Defence Limited. Registered in England and Wales with CRN: 7717863. VAT No: 128 8833 79

Appendix 4

Landmark Envirocheck Report

1250 R01: Issue 3 – Phase I / II Geoenvironmental Assessment, The Nags Head, Moreton January 2019 Figures and Appendices Envirocheck ® Report: Datasheet

Order Details: Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Customer Reference: 1250 National Grid Reference: 553410, 207050 Slice: A Site Area (Ha): 0.32 Search Buffer (m): 1000 Site Details: Land to the rear of Nags Head Moreton ONGAR ESSEX CM5 0LF

Client Details: Mr C Duffield Green Earth Management Ltd Building 2 Broomfield Park Coggeshall Road Earls Colne Essex CO6 2JX

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Contents

Report Section Page Number

Summary -

Agency & Hydrological 1

Waste 24

Hazardous Substances 26

Geological 27

Industrial Land Use 32

Sensitive Land Use 34

Data Currency 35

Data Suppliers 41

Useful Contacts 42

Introduction

The Environment Act 1995 has made site sensitivity a key issue, as the legislation pays as much attention to the pathways by which contamination could spread, and to the vulnerable targets of contamination, as it does the potential sources of contamination. For this reason, Landmark's Site Sensitivity maps and Datasheet(s) place great emphasis on statutory data provided by the Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency; it also incorporates data from Natural England (and the Scottish and Welsh equivalents) and Local Authorities; and highlights hydrogeological features required by environmental and geotechnical consultants. It does not include any information concerning past uses of land. The datasheet is produced by querying the Landmark database to a distance defined by the client from a site boundary provided by the client. In the attached datasheet the National Grid References (NGRs) are rounded to the nearest 10m in accordance with Landmark's agreements with a number of Data Suppliers.

Copyright Notice

© Landmark Information Group Limited 2018. The Copyright on the information and data and its format as contained in this Envirocheck® Report ("Report") is the property of Landmark Information Group Limited ("Landmark") and several other Data Providers, including (but not limited to) Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, the Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales and Natural England, and must not be reproduced in whole or in part by photocopying or any other method. The Report is supplied under Landmark's Terms and Conditions accepted by the Customer. A copy of Landmark's Terms and Conditions can be found with the Index Map for this report. Additional copies of the Report may be obtained from Landmark, subject to Landmark's charges in force from time to time. The Copyright, design rights and any other intellectual rights shall remain the exclusive property of Landmark and /or other Data providers, whose Copyright material has been included in this Report.

Natural England Copyright Notice

Site of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserve, Ramsar, Special Protection Area, Special Conservation Area, Marine Nature Reserve data (derived from Ordnance Survey 1:10000 raster) is provided by, and used with the permission of, Natural England who retain the copyright and Intellectual Property Rights for the data.

Scottish Natural Heritage Copyright

Contains SNH information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Ove Arup Copyright Notice

The Mining Instability data was obtained on licence from Ove Arup & Partners Limited (for further information, contact [email protected]). No reproduction or further use of such Data is to be made without the prior written consent of Ove Arup & Partners Limited. The supplied Mining Instability data is derived from publicly available records and other third party sources and neither Ove Arup & Partners nor Landmark warrant the accuracy or completeness of such information or data.

Peter Brett Associates Copyright Notice

The cavity data presented has been extracted from the PBA enhanced version of the original DEFRA national cavity databases. PBA/DEFRA retain the copyright & intellectual property rights in the data. Whilst all reasonable efforts are made to check that the information contained in the cavity databases is accurate we do not warrant that the data is complete or error free. The information is based upon our own researches and those collated from a number of external sources and is continually being augmented and updated by PBA. In no event shall PBA/DEFRA or Landmark be liable for any loss or damage including, without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from the use of this data.

Radon Potential dataset Copyright Notice

Information supplied from a joint dataset compiled by The British Geological Survey and Public Health England.

Natural Resources Wales Copyright Notice

Contains Natural Resources Wales information © Natural Resources Wales and Database Right. All rights Reserved. Contains Ordnance Survey Data. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019741. Crown Copyright and Database Right. Contains Natural Resources Wales information © Natural Resources Wales and Database Right. All rights Reserved. Some features of this information are based on digital spatial data licensed from the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology © NERC (CEH). Defra, Met Office and DARD Rivers Agency © Crown copyright. © Cranfield University. © James Hutton Institute. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2018. Land & Property Services © Crown copyright and database right.

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Contents

Report Version v53.0

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Summary

Page 501 to 1000m On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m Data Type Number (*up to 2000m) Agency & Hydrological

BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility pg 1 Yes Yes Yes n/a

Contaminated Land Register Entries and Notices

Discharge Consents pg 2 2 9 5

Prosecutions Relating to Controlled Waters n/a n/a n/a

Enforcement and Prohibition Notices

Integrated Pollution Controls

Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control

Local Authority Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control

Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls

Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control Enforcements

Nearest Surface Water Feature pg 5 Yes

Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters pg 6 3 2 5

Prosecutions Relating to Authorised Processes

Registered Radioactive Substances

River Quality pg 7 2

River Quality Biology Sampling Points pg 8 1

River Quality Chemistry Sampling Points

Substantiated Pollution Incident Register

Water Abstractions pg 8 1 10 5 (*8)

Water Industry Act Referrals

Groundwater Vulnerability pg 14 Yes n/a n/a n/a

Drift Deposits n/a n/a n/a

Bedrock Aquifer Designations pg 14 Yes n/a n/a n/a

Superficial Aquifer Designations pg 14 Yes n/a n/a n/a

Source Protection Zones

Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences pg 14 Yes n/a n/a

Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences pg 17 Yes n/a n/a

Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences n/a n/a

Flood Water Storage Areas n/a n/a

Flood Defences n/a n/a

OS Water Network Lines pg 17 1 7 15 30

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Summary

Page 501 to 1000m On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m Data Type Number (*up to 2000m) Waste

BGS Recorded Landfill Sites pg 24 1

Historical Landfill Sites pg 24 1 1

Integrated Pollution Control Registered Waste Sites

Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Landfill Boundaries)

Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations) pg 24 1

Local Authority Landfill Coverage pg 24 2 n/a n/a n/a

Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites pg 24 1 1

Potentially Infilled Land (Non-Water) pg 25 1 1

Potentially Infilled Land (Water)

Registered Landfill Sites pg 25 1

Registered Waste Transfer Sites

Registered Waste Treatment or Disposal Sites Hazardous Substances

Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH) pg 26 1

Explosive Sites

Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances (NIHHS)

Planning Hazardous Substance Consents pg 26 1

Planning Hazardous Substance Enforcements

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Summary

Page 501 to 1000m On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m Data Type Number (*up to 2000m) Geological

BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology pg 27 Yes n/a n/a n/a

BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry pg 27 Yes Yes Yes Yes

BGS Recorded Mineral Sites pg 30 1 1

BGS Urban Soil Chemistry

BGS Urban Soil Chemistry Averages

CBSCB Compensation District n/a n/a n/a

Coal Mining Affected Areas n/a n/a n/a

Mining Instability n/a n/a n/a

Man-Made Mining Cavities

Natural Cavities

Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain n/a n/a

Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards pg 30 Yes n/a n/a

Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards pg 31 Yes Yes n/a n/a

Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards n/a n/a

Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards pg 31 Yes n/a n/a

Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards pg 31 Yes Yes n/a n/a

Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards pg 31 Yes Yes n/a n/a

Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas n/a n/a n/a

Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures n/a n/a n/a Industrial Land Use

Contemporary Trade Directory Entries pg 32 2 2 1

Fuel Station Entries

Points of Interest - Commercial Services

Points of Interest - Education and Health

Points of Interest - Manufacturing and Production pg 32 2 2

Points of Interest - Public Infrastructure pg 32 2 1

Points of Interest - Recreational and Environmental

Gas Pipelines pg 33 1

Underground Electrical Cables

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Summary

Page 501 to 1000m On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m Data Type Number (*up to 2000m) Sensitive Land Use

Ancient Woodland

Areas of Adopted Green Belt pg 34 1

Areas of Unadopted Green Belt pg 34 1

Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty

Environmentally Sensitive Areas

Forest Parks

Local Nature Reserves

Marine Nature Reserves

National Nature Reserves

National Parks

Nitrate Sensitive Areas

Nitrate Vulnerable Zones pg 34 1

Ramsar Sites

Sites of Special Scientific Interest

Special Areas of Conservation

Special Protection Areas

World Heritage Sites

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Limited Potential for Groundwater Flooding to Occur A13NE 0 1 553410 (N) 207050 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13NE 0 1 553410 (E) 207046 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13SE 1 1 553410 (S) 207000 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding to Occur at Surface A13SW 84 1 553350 (SW) 206950 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13NE 143 1 553500 (NE) 207200 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13NE 164 1 553550 (NE) 207200 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13NW 176 1 553200 (NW) 207150 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Limited Potential for Groundwater Flooding to Occur A13NW 180 1 553400 (N) 207250 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13NE 182 1 553410 (N) 207250 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13NE 186 1 553450 (N) 207250 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13NW 204 1 553200 (NW) 207200 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13NW 209 1 553250 (NW) 207250 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13NW 209 1 553150 (W) 207100 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding to Occur at Surface A13NE 234 1 553600 (NE) 207250 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13NE 280 1 553410 (N) 207350 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Limited Potential for Groundwater Flooding to Occur A13NE 285 1 553450 (N) 207350 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13SE 301 1 553410 (S) 206700 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A8NE 351 1 553410 (S) 206650 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A13NW 380 1 553100 (NW) 207350 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A12NE 453 1 553000 (NW) 207350 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A12NE 456 1 552900 (W) 207050 BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A12NE 475 1 552900 (W) 207200

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 1 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Flooding Type: Potential for Groundwater Flooding of Property Situated Below Ground Level A17SE 488 1 553050 (NW) 207450 Discharge Consents 1 Operator: The Occupier A13NW 195 2 553280 Property Type: DOMESTIC PROPERTY (SINGLE) (INCL FARM HOUSE) (NW) 207250 Location: Dawkins, Harlow Road, Moreton, Essex Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Given Reference: Ctlu.0528 Permit Version: 1 Effective Date: 30th September 1977 Issued Date: 30th September 1977 Revocation Date: 1st October 1996 Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Not Water Company Discharge Land/Soakaway Environment: Receiving Water: Not Supplied Status: Lapsed (under Environment Act 1995, Schedule 23) Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Discharge Consents 2 Operator: Mr & Mrs. M.J. Green A13NW 204 2 553200 Property Type: DOMESTIC PROPERTY (SINGLE) (INCL FARM HOUSE) (NW) 207200 Location: Fairways, Harlow Road, Moreton,Essex Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Given Reference: CTWC.1641 Permit Version: 1 Effective Date: 22nd May 1987 Issued Date: 22nd May 1987 Revocation Date: Not Supplied Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Not Water Company Discharge Irrigation Area Environment: Receiving Water: Kesgrave Sands/Boulder Clay Status: Transferred from COPA 1974 Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Discharge Consents 3 Operator: Thames Water Utilities Ltd A13SE 266 2 553600 Property Type: WWTW/SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS (WATER COMPANY) (SE) 206801 Location: Moreton Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Supplied Reference: Temp.2780 Permit Version: 2 Effective Date: 3rd September 2010 Issued Date: 3rd September 2010 Revocation Date: 31st March 2016 Discharge Type: Public Sewage: Storm Sewage Overflow Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Cripsey Brook Status: Surrendered under EPR 2010 Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Discharge Consents 3 Operator: Thames Water Utilities Ltd A13SE 266 2 553600 Property Type: WWTW/SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS (WATER COMPANY) (SE) 206801 Location: Moreton Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Supplied Reference: Temp.2780 Permit Version: 1 Effective Date: 2nd November 1989 Issued Date: 2nd November 1989 Revocation Date: 2nd September 2010 Discharge Type: Public Sewage: Storm Sewage Overflow Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Cripsey Brook Status: Temporary Consents (Water Act 1989, Section 113) Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 2 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Discharge Consents 3 Operator: Thames Water Utilities Limited. A13SE 266 2 553600 Property Type: PUMPING STN ON UNADOPTED SEWERAGE NETWRK (NOT WATER (SE) 206800 CO) Location: Pumping Station, Moreton Stw, Moreton Bridge, Essex Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Given Reference: CEJR.0041 Permit Version: 1 Effective Date: 20th June 1961 Issued Date: 20th June 1961 Revocation Date: Not Supplied Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Pumping Station - Water Company Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Cripsey Brook Status: Transferred from Rivers (Prevention of Pollution) Act 1951-1961 Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Discharge Consents 3 Operator: Thames Water Utilities Limited A13SE 281 2 553570 Property Type: WWTW/SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS (WATER COMPANY) (SE) 206760 Location: Moreton Wastewater Treatment Works Moreton . Ongar Essex Cm5 0ll Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Supplied Reference: Cebr.0028 Permit Version: 6 Effective Date: 16th June 2016 Issued Date: 16th June 2016 Revocation Date: Not Supplied Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Water Company Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Cripsey Brook Status: Varied under EPR 2010 Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Discharge Consents 4 Operator: Thames Water Utilities Limited. A13SE 276 2 553560 Property Type: WWTW/SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS (WATER COMPANY) (SE) 206760 Location: Moreton Wastewater Treatment Works Moreton . Ongar Essex Cm5 0ll Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Supplied Reference: Cebr.0028 Permit Version: 5 Effective Date: 1st April 2010 Issued Date: 1st April 2010 Revocation Date: 15th June 2016 Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Water Company Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Cripsey Brook Status: Varied by Application - (Water Resources Act 1991, Schedule 10 as amended by Environment Act 1995) Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Discharge Consents 4 Operator: Thames Water Utilities Limited. A13SE 276 2 553560 Property Type: WWTW/SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS (WATER COMPANY) (SE) 206760 Location: Moreton Wastewater Treatment Works Moreton . Ongar Essex Cm5 0ll Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Supplied Reference: Cebr.0028 Permit Version: 4 Effective Date: 1st April 2009 Issued Date: 28th January 2009 Revocation Date: 31st March 2010 Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Water Company Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Cripsey Brook Status: Varied by Application - (Water Resources Act 1991, Schedule 10 as amended by Environment Act 1995) Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 3 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Discharge Consents 4 Operator: Thames Water Utilities Limited. A13SE 276 2 553560 Property Type: WWTW/SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS (WATER COMPANY) (SE) 206760 Location: Moreton Wastewater Treatment Works Moreton . Ongar Essex Cm5 0ll Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Supplied Reference: Cebr.0028 Permit Version: 3 Effective Date: 8th December 2005 Issued Date: 8th December 2005 Revocation Date: 31st March 2009 Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Water Company Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Cripsey Brook Status: Varied by Application - (Water Resources Act 1991, Schedule 10 as amended by Environment Act 1995) Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Discharge Consents 5 Operator: Thames Water Utilities Ltd A13SW 301 2 553400 Property Type: PUMPING STATION ON SEWERAGE NETWORK (WATER COMPANY) (S) 206700 Location: Moreton Bridge Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Supplied Reference: Temp.1543 Permit Version: 2 Effective Date: 3rd September 2010 Issued Date: 3rd September 2010 Revocation Date: 19th August 2014 Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Pumping Station - Water Company Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Cripsey Brook Status: Surrendered under EPR 2010 Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Discharge Consents 5 Operator: Thames Water Utilities Ltd A13SW 301 2 553400 Property Type: PUMPING STATION ON SEWERAGE NETWORK (WATER COMPANY) (S) 206700 Location: Moreton Bridge Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Supplied Reference: Temp.1543 Permit Version: 1 Effective Date: 2nd November 1989 Issued Date: 2nd November 1989 Revocation Date: 2nd September 2010 Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Pumping Station - Water Company Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Cripsey Brook Status: Temporary Consents (Water Act 1989, Section 113) Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Discharge Consents 6 Operator: Mr & Mrs Leverich A8SE 761 2 553720 Property Type: DOMESTIC PROPERTY (SINGLE) (INCL FARM HOUSE) (SE) 206300 Location: Holmesfield No 1 Moreton Bridge Moreton Bridge Road Ongar Essex Essex Cm5 Oln Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Given Reference: CATM.3655 Permit Version: 1 Effective Date: 11th February 1999 Issued Date: 25th March 1999 Revocation Date: Not Supplied Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Not Water Company Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Tributary Of Cripsey Brook Status: New Consent (Water Resources Act 1991, Section 88 & Schedule 10 as amended by Environment Act 1995) Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 4 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Discharge Consents 7 Operator: Mr M Pether A8SW 773 2 553280 Property Type: DOMESTIC PROPERTY (SINGLE) (INCL FARM HOUSE) (S) 206240 Location: New House Farm New House Lane Bobbingworth Ongar Essex Cm5 0dh Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Non-Tidal (River Roding) Reference: Canm.1069 Permit Version: 1 Effective Date: 6th March 2006 Issued Date: 27th March 2006 Revocation Date: Not Supplied Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Not Water Company Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: To Trib Of Cripsey Brook Status: New Consent (Water Resources Act 1991, Section 88 & Schedule 10 as amended by Environment Act 1995) Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Discharge Consents 8 Operator: Dalgety Agriculture Ltd. A18NW 831 2 553320 Property Type: MAKING OF FOOD PRODUCTS/DAIRY (N) 207900 Location: Dalgety Agriculture Ltd, Moreton Mill, Moreton, Ongar, Essex Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Given Reference: CNTM.0016 Permit Version: 1 Effective Date: 20th January 1992 Issued Date: 20th January 1992 Revocation Date: Not Supplied Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Not Water Company Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Tributary Ofcripsey Brook Status: New Consent, by Application (Water Resources Act 1991, Section 88) Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Discharge Consents 8 Operator: Dalgety Agriculture Ltd A18NW 832 2 553300 Property Type: MAKING OF FOOD PRODUCTS/DAIRY (N) 207900 Location: Moreton Mill, Moreton, Ongar, Essex Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Supplied Reference: Ctwc.0112 Permit Version: 1 Effective Date: 10th July 1985 Issued Date: 10th July 1985 Revocation Date: 20th January 1992 Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Not Water Company Discharge Irrigation Area Environment: Receiving Water: Boulder Clay Status: Authorisation revoked Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Discharge Consents 9 Operator: Epping Forest District Council A8SE 987 2 553600 Property Type: DOMESTIC PROPERTY (MULTIPLE) (INCL FARM HOUSES) (S) 206030 Location: 1-8 Gainsthorpe Road, Bobbingworth, Essex,Cm5 0ng Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Catchment Area: Not Given Reference: CTCR.2105 Permit Version: 1 Effective Date: 27th February 1984 Issued Date: 27th February 1984 Revocation Date: Not Supplied Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Not Water Company Discharge Freshwater Stream/River Environment: Receiving Water: Gainsthorpeditch Status: Transferred from Rivers (Prevention of Pollution) Act 1951-1961 Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Nearest Surface Water Feature A13NE 0 - 553459 (E) 207061

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 5 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters 10 Property Type: Not Given A13SW 154 2 553300 Location: Moreton Bridge, MORETON (SW) 206900 Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Pollutant: Oils - Unknown Note: Confirmed As A Pollution Incident Incident Date: 4th July 1992 Incident Reference: NE920354 Catchment Area: Not Given Receiving Water: Not Given Cause of Incident: Not Given Incident Severity: Category 3 - Minor Incident Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters 10 Property Type: Not Given A13SW 191 2 553300 Location: Bridge Road, MORETON (SW) 206850 Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Pollutant: Oils - Unknown Note: Confirmed As A Pollution Incident Incident Date: 16th June 1995 Incident Reference: NE950352 Catchment Area: Not Given Receiving Water: Not Given Cause of Incident: Not Given Incident Severity: Category 2 - Significant Incident Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters 11 Property Type: Not Given A13SW 202 2 553400 Location: Moreton Bridge, MORETON (S) 206800 Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Pollutant: Storm Sewage Note: Not Supplied Incident Date: 16th March 1997 Incident Reference: THNE1997031137 Catchment Area: Not Given Receiving Water: Not Given Cause of Incident: Not Given Incident Severity: Category 3 - Minor Incident Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters 12 Property Type: Not Given A13SE 266 2 553600 Location: Moreton Stw (SE) 206800 Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Pollutant: Unknown Sewage Note: Confirmed As A Pollution Incident Incident Date: 16th July 1990 Incident Reference: NE900273 Catchment Area: Not Given Receiving Water: Not Given Cause of Incident: Not Given Incident Severity: Category 3 - Minor Incident Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters 13 Property Type: Not Given A8NE 409 2 553500 Location: Morton Tip, MORTON (S) 206600 Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Pollutant: General Note: Confirmed incident Incident Date: 27th April 1999 Incident Reference: THNE1999042815 Catchment Area: Not Given Receiving Water: Not Given Cause of Incident: Not Given Incident Severity: Category 3 - Minor Incident Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters 14 Property Type: Not Given A18SW 632 2 553300 Location: MORETON (N) 207700 Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Pollutant: Unknown Sewage Note: Confirmed As A Pollution Incident Incident Date: 6th December 1991 Incident Reference: NE910582 Catchment Area: Not Given Receiving Water: Not Given Cause of Incident: Not Given Incident Severity: Category 3 - Minor Incident Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 6 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters 15 Property Type: Not Given A18NW 731 2 553400 Location: MORETON (N) 207800 Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Pollutant: Oils - Unknown Note: Confirmed As A Pollution Incident Incident Date: 16th December 1991 Incident Reference: NE910593 Catchment Area: Not Given Receiving Water: Not Given Cause of Incident: Not Given Incident Severity: Category 3 - Minor Incident Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters 16 Property Type: Not Given A18NW 732 2 553300 Location: Harlow Road, MORETON (N) 207800 Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Pollutant: Oils - Unknown Note: Confirmed As A Pollution Incident Incident Date: 5th January 1992 Incident Reference: NE920002 Catchment Area: Not Given Receiving Water: Not Given Cause of Incident: Not Given Incident Severity: Category 3 - Minor Incident Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters 17 Property Type: Not Given A18NW 826 2 553320 Location: Mill Lane, MORETON (N) 207895 Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Pollutant: Unknown Sewage Note: Not Supplied Incident Date: 3rd June 1996 Incident Reference: NE960373 Catchment Area: Not Given Receiving Water: Not Given Cause of Incident: Not Given Incident Severity: Category 3 - Minor Incident Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters 18 Property Type: Not Given A18NW 931 2 553400 Location: MORETON (N) 208000 Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Pollutant: Unknown Sewage Note: Confirmed As A Pollution Incident Incident Date: 13th September 1990 Incident Reference: NE900383 Catchment Area: Not Given Receiving Water: Not Given Cause of Incident: Not Given Incident Severity: Category 3 - Minor Incident Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m River Quality Name: Cripsey Bk A13SW 71 2 553338 GQA Grade: River Quality C (SW) 206979 Reach: Delved Bridge - Moreton Bridge Estimated Distance 5.9 (km): Flow Rate: Flow less than 0.31 cumecs Flow Type: River Year: 2000 River Quality Name: Cripsey Bk A13SW 78 2 553404 GQA Grade: River Quality B (S) 206924 Reach: Moreton Bridge - Roding Estimated Distance 8.1 (km): Flow Rate: Flow less than 0.31 cumecs Flow Type: River Year: 2000

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 7 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

River Quality Biology Sampling Points 19 Name: Cripsey Brook A13SW 165 2 553350 Reach: Moreton Bridge To Roding (S) 206850 Estimated Distance: 8.10 Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Year: 1990 GQA Grade: River Quality Biology GQA Grade C - Fairly Good Year: 1995 GQA Grade: River Quality Biology GQA Grade C - Fairly Good Year: 2000 GQA Grade: River Quality Biology GQA Grade B - Good Year: 2002 GQA Grade: River Quality Biology GQA Grade B - Good Year: 2003 GQA Grade: River Quality Biology GQA Grade B - Good Year: 2004 GQA Grade: River Quality Biology GQA Grade B - Good Year: 2005 GQA Grade: River Quality Biology GQA Grade B - Good Year: 2006 GQA Grade: River Quality Biology GQA Grade B - Good Year: 2007 GQA Grade: River Quality Biology GQA Grade D - Fair Year: 2008 GQA Grade: River Quality Biology GQA Grade D - Fair Year: 2009 GQA Grade: River Quality Biology GQA Grade D - Fair Water Abstractions 20 Operator: Moreton Sand & Gravel Co Ltd A13NW 132 2 553400 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0002 (N) 207200 Permit Version: Not Supplied Location: Moreton, MORETON Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: Sand And Gravel Washing Abstraction Type: Not Supplied Source: River/Stream Intake Daily Rate (m3): 491 Yearly Rate (m3): 127288 Details: Not Supplied Authorised Start: Not Supplied Authorised End: Not Supplied Permit Start Date: Not Supplied Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Water Abstractions 21 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A13SE 277 2 553700 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0004 (SE) 206900 Permit Version: 100 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Well Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Farming And Domestic Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Groundwater Daily Rate (m3): 14 Yearly Rate (m3): 2910 Details: Nether Hall, Moreton, Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 January Authorised End: 31 December Permit Start Date: 19th September 1977 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Water Abstractions 21 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A13SE 277 2 553700 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0016 (SE) 206900 Permit Version: 100 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Pond Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): 9092 Details: Nether Hall, Moreton, Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 30 April Permit Start Date: 27th July 1977 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 8 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Water Abstractions 21 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A13SE 277 2 553700 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0016 (SE) 206900 Permit Version: 100 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Trib Of Cripsey Brook Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Nether Hall, Moreton, Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 30 April Permit Start Date: 27th July 1977 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Water Abstractions 22 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A13SE 320 2 553702 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0032/R01 (SE) 206825 Permit Version: 1 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton- Cripsey Brook Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a river or stream reach, or a row of wellpoints Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Nether Hall, Moreton, Ongar Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 31 March Permit Start Date: 1st April 2016 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Water Abstractions 22 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A13SE 320 2 553702 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0032 (SE) 206825 Permit Version: 1 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton- Cripsey Brook Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a river or stream reach, or a row of wellpoints Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Nether Hall, Moreton, Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 31 March Permit Start Date: 1st January 2006 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Water Abstractions 22 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A13SE 321 2 553690 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0032 (SE) 206810 Permit Version: 1 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton- Cripsey Brook Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a river or stream reach, or a row of wellpoints Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Nether Hall, Moreton, Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 31 March Permit Start Date: 1st January 2006 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 9 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Water Abstractions 22 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A13SE 335 2 553700 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0027 (SE) 206800 Permit Version: 102 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Cripsey Brook (B) Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Direct Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Nether Hall, Moreton, Near Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 April Authorised End: 31 October Permit Start Date: 20th February 2017 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Water Abstractions 22 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A13SE 335 2 553700 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0027 (SE) 206800 Permit Version: 102 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Cripsey Brook (B) Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Reservoir At Nether Hall, Moreton, Near Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 31 March Permit Start Date: 20th February 2017 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Water Abstractions 22 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A13SE 335 2 553700 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0027 (SE) 206800 Permit Version: 101 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Cripsey Brook (B) Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Direct Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Nether Hall, Moreton, Near Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 April Authorised End: 31 October Permit Start Date: 29th August 2000 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Water Abstractions 22 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A13SE 335 2 553700 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0027 (SE) 206800 Permit Version: 101 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Cripsey Brook (B) Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Reservoir At Nether Hall, Moreton, Near Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 31 March Permit Start Date: 29th August 2000 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 10 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Water Abstractions 23 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A9NW 759 2 554000 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0027 (SE) 206500 Permit Version: 102 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Cripsey Brook (A-B) Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Direct Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a river or stream reach, or a row of wellpoints Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Nether Hall, Moreton, Near Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 April Authorised End: 31 October Permit Start Date: 20th February 2017 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Water Abstractions 23 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A9NW 759 2 554000 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0027 (SE) 206500 Permit Version: 102 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Cripsey Brook (A-B) Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a river or stream reach, or a row of wellpoints Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Reservoir At Nether Hall, Moreton, Near Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 31 March Permit Start Date: 20th February 2017 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Water Abstractions 23 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A9NW 759 2 554000 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0027 (SE) 206500 Permit Version: 101 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Cripsey Brook (A-B) Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Direct Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a river or stream reach, or a row of wellpoints Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): 1309 Yearly Rate (m3): 22730 Details: Nether Hall, Moreton, Near Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 April Authorised End: 31 October Permit Start Date: 29th August 2000 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Water Abstractions 23 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A9NW 759 2 554000 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0027 (SE) 206500 Permit Version: 101 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Cripsey Brook (A-B) Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a river or stream reach, or a row of wellpoints Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Reservoir At Nether Hall, Moreton, Near Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 31 March Permit Start Date: 29th August 2000 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 11 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Water Abstractions 23 Operator: Schwier Farms Ltd A9NW 759 2 554000 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0031 (SE) 206500 Permit Version: 1 Location: Nether Hall, Moreton - Cripsey Brook (A-B) Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a river or stream reach, or a row of wellpoints Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Moreton, Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 31 March Permit Start Date: 29th August 2000 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Water Abstractions Operator: Mr J Gemmill A9SE 1114 2 554200 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0010 (SE) 206200 Permit Version: 100 Location: Wood Farm, Ongar - Well Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Farming And Domestic Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Groundwater Daily Rate (m3): 5 Yearly Rate (m3): 1500 Details: Wood Farm, Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 January Authorised End: 31 December Permit Start Date: 25th October 1966 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Water Abstractions Operator: Mr W W J Collins A22NE 1668 2 553000 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0015 (N) 208700 Permit Version: 100 Location: High Laver Hall, Moreton - Spring Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): 455 Yearly Rate (m3): 2728 Details: Reservoir At High Laver Hall, High Laver, Moreton, Ongar Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 31 March Permit Start Date: 16th August 1988 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Water Abstractions Operator: Mr W W J Collins (N) 1707 2 553000 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0015/R01 208740 Permit Version: 1 Location: High Laver Hall, Moreton- Spring Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Groundwater Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Reservoir At High Laver Hall, High Laver, Moreton, Ongar Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 31 March Permit Start Date: 1st April 2016 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 12 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Water Abstractions Operator: Mr W W J Collins (N) 1707 2 553000 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0015 208740 Permit Version: 101 Location: High Laver Hall, Moreton- Spring Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Storage Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Groundwater Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Reservoir At High Laver Hall, High Laver, Moreton, Ongar Authorised Start: 01 November Authorised End: 31 March Permit Start Date: 22nd March 2007 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Water Abstractions Operator: Mr L V Eldred (W) 1715 2 551710 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0034 206580 Permit Version: 1 Location: Cripsey Brook At Ashlyns Farm, Moreton, Ongar, Essex Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Direct Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied Details: Ashlyns Farm, Moreton, Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 June Authorised End: 31 August Permit Start Date: 22nd March 2007 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Water Abstractions Operator: Mr W W J Collins A22NE 1722 2 552800 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0006 (N) 208700 Permit Version: 100 Location: High Laver Hall, Ongar - Well Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Farming And Domestic Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Groundwater Daily Rate (m3): 14 Yearly Rate (m3): 4092 Details: High Laver Hall, Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 January Authorised End: 31 December Permit Start Date: 3rd November 1966 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Water Abstractions Operator: Mr W W J Collins (W) 1748 2 551700 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0015 206500 Permit Version: 100 Location: Ashlyns Farm, Ongar - Cripsey Brook Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: General Agriculture: Spray Irrigation - Direct Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point Source: Surface Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied Yearly Rate (m3): 45455 Details: Ashlyns Farm, Moreton, Ongar, Essex Authorised Start: 01 June Authorised End: 31 August Permit Start Date: 16th August 1988 Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 13 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Water Abstractions Operator: W W J Collins (W) 1748 2 551700 Licence Number: 08/37/52/0015B 206500 Permit Version: Not Supplied Location: Ashlyns Farm, Moreton, ONGAR, Essex Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region Abstraction: Spray Irrigation Abstraction Type: Not Supplied Source: River Daily Rate (m3): 455 Yearly Rate (m3): 2728 Details: Not Supplied Authorised Start: Not Supplied Authorised End: Not Supplied Permit Start Date: Not Supplied Permit End Date: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m Groundwater Vulnerability Soil Classification: Soils of Intermediate Leaching Potential (I1) - Soils which can possibly A13NE 0 2 553410 transmit a wide range of pollutants (E) 207046 Map Sheet: Sheet 40 Thames Estuary Scale: 1:100,000 Drift Deposits None Bedrock Aquifer Designations Aquifer Designation: Unproductive Strata A13NE 0 1 553410 (E) 207046 Superficial Aquifer Designations Aquifer Designation: Secondary Aquifer - A A13NE 0 1 553410 (E) 207046 Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 98 2 553356 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206924 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 99 2 553356 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models and Fluvial Events (SW) 206922 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 99 2 553361 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (S) 206919 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 104 2 553375 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (S) 206905 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 115 2 553347 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (SW) 206909 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 117 2 553394 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (S) 206886 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 119 2 553346 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206905 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 120 2 553379 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (S) 206887 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 121 2 553341 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (SW) 206907 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 123 2 553339 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206905 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 14 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 127 2 553331 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (SW) 206907 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 129 2 553326 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (SW) 206909 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 130 2 553326 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206907 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 130 2 553319 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206915 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 135 2 553315 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (SW) 206912 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 136 2 553314 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206911 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 138 2 553310 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206915 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 138 2 553311 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (SW) 206912 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SE 143 2 553440 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (S) 206859 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SE 144 2 553441 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (S) 206858 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 151 2 553291 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (SW) 206917 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 156 2 553281 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206924 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 164 2 553266 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (SW) 206924 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 164 2 553244 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (SW) 206942 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 172 2 553225 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206949 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 172 2 553223 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206952 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 15 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 172 2 553221 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206954 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 172 2 553246 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206929 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 172 2 553224 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (SW) 206952 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SE 173 2 553497 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (SE) 206844 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 180 2 553206 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (W) 206962 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 191 2 553188 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (W) 206971 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 192 2 553186 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (W) 206972 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 193 2 553185 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (W) 206972 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 195 2 553181 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (W) 206974 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 223 2 553389 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (S) 206779 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 223 2 553354 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (S) 206787 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 226 2 553356 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (S) 206783 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 228 2 553349 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (S) 206783 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 229 2 553324 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (S) 206792 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 230 2 553376 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (S) 206774 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 243 2 553309 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (S) 206783 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 16 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 244 2 553176 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Events (SW) 206897 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Type: Extent of Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences A13SW 108 2 553359 Flood Plain Type: Fluvial Models (S) 206909 Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences None Flood Water Storage Areas None Flood Defences None OS Water Network Lines 24 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13NE 0 3 553459 Watercourse Length: 457.1 (E) 207061 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 25 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13SW 168 3 553342 Watercourse Length: 378.9 (S) 206850 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Cripsey Brook Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 26 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13SW 176 3 553316 Watercourse Length: 24.2 (SW) 206857 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 27 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13SW 176 3 553316 Watercourse Length: 382.9 (SW) 206857 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Cripsey Brook Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 28 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13SW 200 3 553304 Watercourse Length: 45.3 (SW) 206836 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 29 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13SW 200 3 553304 Watercourse Length: 18.3 (SW) 206836 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 30 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13SW 215 3 553304 Watercourse Length: 36.4 (SW) 206818 Watercourse Level: Not Supplied Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 17 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

OS Water Network Lines 31 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13SW 250 3 553281 Watercourse Length: 109.9 (SW) 206791 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 32 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13SW 251 3 553287 Watercourse Length: 118.7 (SW) 206786 Watercourse Level: Not Supplied Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 33 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13SE 273 3 553495 Watercourse Length: 172.6 (S) 206737 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 34 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13NW 299 3 553165 Watercourse Length: 843.7 (NW) 207300 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 35 Watercourse Form: Inland river A14SW 301 3 553749 Watercourse Length: 414.0 (E) 206969 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 36 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13SE 303 3 553617 Watercourse Length: 219.4 (SE) 206766 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Cripsey Brook Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 37 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13NW 314 3 553071 Watercourse Length: 382.8 (NW) 207199 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 38 Watercourse Form: Inland river A13SW 318 3 553180 Watercourse Length: 140.5 (SW) 206788 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 39 Watercourse Form: Inland river A12NE 330 3 553065 Watercourse Length: 1.8 (NW) 207223 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 18 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

OS Water Network Lines 40 Watercourse Form: Inland river A12NE 331 3 553063 Watercourse Length: 133.3 (NW) 207223 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 41 Watercourse Form: Inland river A12SE 347 3 553019 Watercourse Length: 1024.9 (W) 206975 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Cripsey Brook Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 42 Watercourse Form: Inland river A8NW 354 3 553298 Watercourse Length: 43.4 (S) 206668 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 43 Watercourse Form: Inland river A14SW 383 3 553841 Watercourse Length: 252.9 (E) 207032 Watercourse Level: Not Supplied Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 44 Watercourse Form: Inland river A8NW 422 3 553179 Watercourse Length: 333.9 (SW) 206652 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 45 Watercourse Form: Inland river A14SW 423 3 553786 Watercourse Length: 110.6 (SE) 206765 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Cripsey Brook Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 46 Watercourse Form: Inland river A14SW 437 3 553877 Watercourse Length: 31.4 (E) 206921 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 47 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 504 3 553817 Watercourse Length: 2.9 (SE) 206677 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 48 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 505 3 553819 Watercourse Length: 3.4 (SE) 206679 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 19 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

OS Water Network Lines 49 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 505 3 553822 Watercourse Length: 67.1 (SE) 206681 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Cripsey Brook Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 50 Watercourse Form: Inland river A14SW 547 3 553918 Watercourse Length: 115.5 (SE) 206738 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 51 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 556 3 553857 Watercourse Length: 17.6 (SE) 206643 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 52 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 568 3 553912 Watercourse Length: 37.3 (SE) 206692 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 53 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 568 3 553912 Watercourse Length: 13.5 (SE) 206692 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 54 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 569 3 553862 Watercourse Length: 3.4 (SE) 206631 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 55 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 570 3 553861 Watercourse Length: 52.0 (SE) 206628 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Cripsey Brook Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 56 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 595 3 553920 Watercourse Length: 68.8 (SE) 206658 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 57 Watercourse Form: Inland river A14NW 606 3 554056 Watercourse Length: 198.5 (E) 207167 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 20 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

OS Water Network Lines 58 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 622 3 553904 Watercourse Length: 178.2 (SE) 206598 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Cripsey Brook Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 59 Watercourse Form: Inland river A18NW 659 3 553297 Watercourse Length: 240.0 (N) 207727 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 60 Watercourse Form: Inland river A8SE 706 3 553427 Watercourse Length: 147.3 (S) 206295 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 61 Watercourse Form: Inland river A7SE 752 3 553036 Watercourse Length: 6.0 (SW) 206353 Watercourse Level: Underground Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 62 Watercourse Form: Inland river A14NE 754 3 554169 Watercourse Length: 73.3 (E) 207317 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 63 Watercourse Form: Inland river A14NE 754 3 554169 Watercourse Length: 111.4 (E) 207317 Watercourse Level: Not Supplied Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 64 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 755 3 554023 Watercourse Length: 335.9 (SE) 206532 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Cripsey Brook Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 65 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 755 3 554023 Watercourse Length: 4.6 (SE) 206532 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 66 Watercourse Form: Inland river A7SE 758 3 553034 Watercourse Length: 328.1 (SW) 206347 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 21 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

OS Water Network Lines 67 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 759 3 554028 Watercourse Length: 48.3 (SE) 206531 Watercourse Level: Not Supplied Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 68 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9NW 775 3 554069 Watercourse Length: 395.5 (SE) 206556 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 69 Watercourse Form: Inland river A18NW 803 3 553141 Watercourse Length: 371.5 (N) 207845 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 70 Watercourse Form: Inland river A18NW 804 3 553141 Watercourse Length: 2.8 (N) 207845 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 71 Watercourse Form: Inland river A14NE 862 3 554280 Watercourse Length: 51.6 (E) 207325 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 72 Watercourse Form: Inland river A8SE 879 3 553718 Watercourse Length: 219.8 (S) 206173 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 73 Watercourse Form: Inland river A14SE 890 3 554325 Watercourse Length: 6.1 (E) 206849 Watercourse Level: Not Supplied Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 74 Watercourse Form: Inland river A14SE 890 3 554326 Watercourse Length: 407.7 (E) 206855 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1 OS Water Network Lines 75 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9SW 970 3 553919 Watercourse Length: 6.9 (SE) 206166 Watercourse Level: Not Supplied Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 22 of 42 Agency & Hydrological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

OS Water Network Lines 76 Watercourse Form: Inland river A9SW 975 3 553926 Watercourse Length: 283.2 (SE) 206165 Watercourse Level: On ground surface Permanent: True Watercourse Name: Not Supplied Catchment Name: Thames Primacy: 1

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 23 of 42 Waste

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

BGS Recorded Landfill Sites 77 Site Name: Bovington Tip A8NE 464 - 553620 Location: MORETON, Essex (SE) 206580 Authority: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service Ground Water: Information not available Surface Water: Information not available Geology: N/A Positional Accuracy: Positioned by the supplier Boundary Accuracy: Moderate Historical Landfill Sites 78 Licence Holder: Moreton Sand and Gravel Company Limited - Epping and Ongar Rural District A13NE 0 2 553410 Council (E) 207046 Location: Moreton, Essex Name: Harlow Road Operator Location: Harlow Common, Harlow, Essex Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Provider Reference: EAHLD10866 First Input Date: 31st December 1955 Last Input Date: 31st July 1995 Specified Waste Deposited Waste included Inert and Household Waste Type: EA Waste Ref: 0 Regis Ref: Not Supplied WRC Ref: 1500/0009 BGS Ref: Not Supplied Other Ref: 008/77, EPP002, AP-747 Historical Landfill Sites 79 Licence Holder: Not Supplied A8NE 332 2 553507 Location: Moreton Bridge, Moreton, Essex (S) 206679 Name: Bobbingworth Gravel Pit Operator Location: Not Supplied Boundary Accuracy: As Supplied Provider Reference: EAHLD10922 First Input Date: 31st December 1954 Last Input Date: 31st December 1972 Specified Waste Deposited Waste included Commercial and Household Waste Type: EA Waste Ref: 0 Regis Ref: Not Supplied WRC Ref: 1500/0654 BGS Ref: 1226 Other Ref: EPP037 Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations) 80 Licence Number: 80787 A8NW 380 2 553398 Location: Land/premises At, Moreton Bridge, Moreton, Ongar, Essex, CM5 0LL (S) 206621 Operator Name: Epping Forest District Council Operator Location: Not Supplied Authority: Environment Agency - Thames Region, North East Area Site Category: Treatment - Biological Licence Status: Modified Issued: 9th July 2007 Last Modified: 14th May 2018 Expires: Not Supplied Suspended: Not Supplied Revoked: Not Supplied Surrendered: Not Supplied IPPC Reference: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m Local Authority Landfill Coverage Name: Epping Forest District Council 0 5 553410 - Has not been able to supply Landfill data 207046 Local Authority Landfill Coverage Name: Essex County Council 0 4 553410 - Has supplied landfill data 207046 Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites 81 Location: Harlow Road, Moreton, Ongar A13NE 141 4 553528 Reference: 22/421/20 (NE) 207187 Authority: Essex County Council Last Reported Not Supplied Status: Types of Waste: Not Supplied Date of Closure: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Manually positioned within the geographical locality Boundary Quality: Not Applicable

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 24 of 42 Waste

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites 82 Location: Bobbingworth A8NE 629 4 553655 Reference: 22/421/19 (S) 206416 Authority: Essex County Council Last Reported Not Supplied Status: Types of Waste: Not Supplied Date of Closure: Not Supplied Positional Accuracy: Manually positioned within the geographical locality Boundary Quality: Not Applicable Potentially Infilled Land (Non-Water) 83 Bearing Ref: N A13NW 163 9 553362 Use: Unknown Filled Ground (Pit, quarry etc) (N) 207233 Date of Mapping: 1996 Potentially Infilled Land (Non-Water) 84 Bearing Ref: S A8NE 471 9 553478 Use: Unknown Filled Ground (Pit, quarry etc) (S) 206533 Date of Mapping: 1996 Registered Landfill Sites 85 Licence Holder: Moreton Sand & Gravel A13NE 0 2 553410 Licence Reference: 8/77 (E) 207046 Site Location: Harlow Road, Moreton, Ongar, Essex Licence Easting: Not Supplied Licence Northing: Not Supplied Operator Location: Harlow Common, HARLOW, Essex, CM17 9HY Authority: Environment Agency - Thames Region, North East Area Site Category: Landfill Max Input Rate: Very Small (Less than 10,000 tonnes per year) Waste Source No known restriction on source of waste Restrictions: Status: Licence lapsed/cancelled/defunct/not applicable/surrenderedCancelled Dated: 1st June 1977 Preceded By Not Given Licence: Superseded By Not Given Licence: Positional Accuracy: Positioned by the supplier Boundary Accuracy: Moderate Authorised Waste Constr'N/Demol. Inert/Non-Haz/Non-Tox Max.Waste Permitted By Licence

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 25 of 42 Hazardous Substances

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH) 86 Name: Dalgety Agriculture Ltd A18NW 947 6 553404 Location: Moreton Mill, Ongar, Essex, CM5 0DP (N) 208017 Reference: Not Supplied Type: Lower Tier Status: Record Ceased To Be Supplied Under COMAH Regulations Positional Accuracy: Automatically positioned to the address Planning Hazardous Substance Consents 87 Name: Dalgety Agriculture Ltd A18NW 947 7 553404 Location: Moreton Mill, Moreton, ONGAR, Essex, CM5 0DP (N) 208017 Authority: Epping Forest District Council, Planning Services Application Ref: HSC/EPF/0002/92 Hazardous Ammonium nitrate and ammonium nitrate compounds (where nitrogen content Substance: is more than 28% by weight) or aqueous ammonium nitrate solutions (where concentration of ammonium nitrate is more than 90% by weight) Maximum Quantity: 1200 Application date: 1st November 1992 Decision: Deemed Consent GrantedGranted Positional Accuracy: Automatically positioned to the address

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 26 of 42 Geological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology Description: Thames Group A13NE 0 1 553410 (E) 207046 BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A13NE 0 1 553410 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (E) 207046 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel <15 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A13NW 2 1 553390 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (NW) 207070 Arsenic 15 - 25 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 30 - 45 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A13SW 54 1 553402 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (S) 206948 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A13SW 126 1 553270 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (SW) 206970 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 90 - 120 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A13SW 128 1 553354 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (S) 206888 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 30 - 45 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A13NE 185 1 553644 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (E) 207059 Arsenic 15 - 25 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 30 - 45 mg/kg Concentration:

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 27 of 42 Geological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A13SE 290 1 553473 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (S) 206716 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel <15 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A13SW 323 1 553169 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (SW) 206793 Arsenic 15 - 25 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 30 - 45 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A12NE 348 1 553064 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (NW) 207258 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 90 - 120 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A12NE 356 1 553000 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (W) 207046 Arsenic 15 - 25 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A12SE 420 1 553000 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (SW) 206839 Arsenic 15 - 25 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A12NE 467 1 552986 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (NW) 207354 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel <15 mg/kg Concentration:

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 28 of 42 Geological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A14SW 479 1 553915 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (E) 206896 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel <15 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A14SW 533 1 553919 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (SE) 206768 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 90 - 120 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A12SW 652 1 552706 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (W) 207005 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 90 - 120 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A12SW 659 1 552700 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (W) 207000 Arsenic 15 - 25 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A12SW 821 1 552537 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (W) 207000 Arsenic 15 - 25 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A17NE 821 1 553000 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (NW) 207810 Arsenic 15 - 25 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration:

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 29 of 42 Geological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A9SW 823 1 553845 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (SE) 206293 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 90 - 120 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A9NE 862 1 554213 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (SE) 206619 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 60 - 90 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel <15 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service A7NW 916 1 552526 Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil (SW) 206673 Arsenic <15 mg/kg Concentration: Cadmium <1.8 mg/kg Concentration: Chromium 90 - 120 mg/kg Concentration: Lead Concentration: <100 mg/kg Nickel 15 - 30 mg/kg Concentration: BGS Recorded Mineral Sites 88 Site Name: Moreton A13NE 240 1 553500 Location: Not Supplied (N) 207300 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service Reference: 1826 Type: Opencast Status: Ceased Operator: Not Supplied Operator Location: Not Supplied Periodic Type: Quaternary Geology: Kesgrave Formation Commodity: Sand and Gravel Positional Accuracy: Unknown BGS Recorded Mineral Sites 89 Site Name: Moreton Sand Pit A8NE 442 1 553472 Location: Not Supplied (S) 206562 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service Reference: 180874 Type: Opencast Status: Ceased Operator: Not Supplied Operator Location: Not Supplied Periodic Type: Anglian Geology: Lowestoft Formation Commodity: Sand Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m BGS Measured Urban Soil Chemistry No data available BGS Urban Soil Chemistry Averages No data available Coal Mining Affected Areas In an area that might not be affected by coal mining Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain No Hazard Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: Very Low A13NE 0 1 553410 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (E) 207046

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 30 of 42 Geological

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: No Hazard A13SW 128 1 553354 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (S) 206888 Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: Moderate A13NE 0 1 553415 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (N) 207063 Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: No Hazard A13NE 0 1 553410 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (E) 207046 Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: No Hazard A13NE 101 1 553521 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (NE) 207143 Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: Moderate A13SW 128 1 553354 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (S) 206888 Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: No Hazard A13NE 0 1 553410 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (E) 207046 Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: Very Low A13NE 0 1 553410 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (E) 207046 Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: Very Low A13NE 0 1 553415 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (N) 207063 Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: No Hazard A13NE 0 1 553410 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (E) 207046 Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: No Hazard A13NE 101 1 553521 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (NE) 207143 Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: Low A13SW 128 1 553354 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (S) 206888 Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: No Hazard A13NE 208 1 553484 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (N) 207270 Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: Moderate A13SE 0 1 553409 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (S) 207026 Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: No Hazard A13NE 0 1 553410 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (E) 207046 Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: Low A13NW 2 1 553390 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (NW) 207070 Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards Hazard Potential: Low A13NE 185 1 553644 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service (E) 207059 Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas Affected Area: The property is in a Lower probability radon area (less than 1% of homes are A13NE 0 1 553410 estimated to be at or above the Action Level). (E) 207046 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures Protection Measure: No radon protective measures are necessary in the construction of new A13NE 0 1 553410 dwellings or extensions (E) 207046 Source: British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 31 of 42 Industrial Land Use

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Contemporary Trade Directory Entries 90 Name: Rod Foster A13NW 86 - 553275 Location: Cedar Lodge, Harlow Road, Moreton, Ongar, Essex, CM5 0LH (W) 207095 Classification: Garage Services Status: Inactive Positional Accuracy: Automatically positioned to the address Contemporary Trade Directory Entries 90 Name: Graham Autos A13NW 91 - 553265 Location: Harlow Road, Moreton, Ongar, Essex, CM5 0LH (W) 207066 Classification: Car Body Repairs Status: Inactive Positional Accuracy: Automatically positioned to the address Contemporary Trade Directory Entries 91 Name: Equus Health A12SE 422 - 553059 Location: Pedlars End, Moreton, Ongar, Essex, CM5 0LW (SW) 206762 Classification: Pet Foods & Animal Feeds Status: Inactive Positional Accuracy: Automatically positioned to the address Contemporary Trade Directory Entries 92 Name: Hog Furnishing A14SW 443 - 553900 Location: Nether Hall Farm, Church Road, Moreton, Ongar, Essex, CM5 0JA (E) 207031 Classification: Furniture Manufacturers - Home & Office Status: Inactive Positional Accuracy: Automatically positioned to the address Contemporary Trade Directory Entries 93 Name: Agrii A18NW 947 - 553404 Location: Moreton Mill, Ongar, Essex, CM5 0DP (N) 208017 Classification: Agricultural Merchants Status: Inactive Positional Accuracy: Automatically positioned to the address Points of Interest - Manufacturing and Production 94 Name: Gravel Pits A13NE 300 8 553455 Location: CM5 (N) 207364 Category: Extractive Industries Class Code: Sand, Gravel and Clay Extraction and Merchants Positional Accuracy: Positioned to an adjacent address or location Points of Interest - Manufacturing and Production 95 Name: Schwier Farm Ltd A14SW 442 8 553900 Location: Church Road, Moreton, Ongar, CM5 0JA (E) 207030 Category: Farming Class Code: Arable Farming Positional Accuracy: Positioned to address or location Points of Interest - Manufacturing and Production 96 Name: Norma's Cattery A14NE 816 8 554223 Location: Maltings Farm Maltings Hill, Church Road, Moreton, Ongar, CM5 0JY (E) 207349 Category: Farming Class Code: Livestock Farming Positional Accuracy: Positioned to address or location Points of Interest - Manufacturing and Production 97 Name: Tank A8SW 872 8 553329 Location: CM5 (S) 206133 Category: Industrial Features Class Code: Tanks (Generic) Positional Accuracy: Positioned to an adjacent address or location Points of Interest - Public Infrastructure 98 Name: Sludge Beds A13SE 288 8 553532 Location: CM5 (S) 206734 Category: Infrastructure and Facilities Class Code: Waste Storage, Processing and Disposal Positional Accuracy: Positioned to an adjacent address or location Points of Interest - Public Infrastructure 98 Name: Sewage Works A13SE 306 8 553543 Location: CM5 (S) 206719 Category: Infrastructure and Facilities Class Code: Waste Storage, Processing and Disposal Positional Accuracy: Positioned to address or location Points of Interest - Public Infrastructure 99 Name: Refuse Tip A8NE 646 8 553684 Location: CM5 (SE) 206409 Category: Infrastructure and Facilities Class Code: Refuse Disposal Facilities Positional Accuracy: Positioned to an adjacent address or location

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 32 of 42 Industrial Land Use

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Gas Pipelines 100 Name: FM18 - Matching Green to Stapleford Tawney A12NW 841 9 552515 Nat Grid: Owned By National Grid (W) 207044 Diameter (mm): 900 Building Proximity 75 Distance (m): Status: Active Pipe Length (m): 14585.5 Pipe Number: Feeder 18

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 33 of 42 Sensitive Land Use

Quadrant Estimated Map Reference Details Distance Contact NGR ID (Compass Direction) From Site

Areas of Adopted Green Belt 101 Authority: Epping Forest District Council, Planning Services A13NE 0 7 553410 Plan Name: Epping Forest District Local Plan (E) 207046 Status: Adopted Plan Date: 31st January 1998 Areas of Unadopted Green Belt 102 Authority: Epping Forest District Council, Planning Services A13NE 0 7 553410 Plan Name: Epping Forest District Local Plan (E) 207046 Status: Revised Deposit Plan Date: 31st July 2005 Nitrate Vulnerable Zones 103 Name: Roding (Cripsey Brook To Loxford Water) Nvz A13NE 0 11 553410 Description: Surface Water (E) 207046 Source: Environment Agency, Head Office

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 34 of 42 Data Currency

Agency & Hydrological Version Update Cycle

Contaminated Land Register Entries and Notices Uttlesford District Council - Environmental Health Department December 2014 Annual Rolling Update Harlow District Council - Environmental Health Department January 2015 Annual Rolling Update Brentwood Borough Council - Environmental Health Department March 2014 Annual Rolling Update Epping Forest District Council - Environmental Health Department October 2014 Annual Rolling Update Discharge Consents Environment Agency - Thames Region July 2018 Quarterly Enforcement and Prohibition Notices Environment Agency - Anglian Region March 2013 As notified Environment Agency - Thames Region March 2013 As notified Integrated Pollution Controls Environment Agency - Anglian Region October 2008 Variable Environment Agency - Thames Region October 2008 Variable Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control Environment Agency - Anglian Region July 2018 Quarterly Environment Agency - South East Region - North East Thames Area July 2018 Quarterly Environment Agency - Thames Region July 2018 Quarterly Local Authority Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control Brentwood Borough Council - Environmental Health Department March 2013 Variable Epping Forest District Council - Environmental Health Department May 2016 Variable Harlow District Council - Environmental Health Department November 2014 Variable Uttlesford District Council - Environmental Health Department September 2014 Variable Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls Brentwood Borough Council - Environmental Health Department March 2013 Annual Rolling Update Epping Forest District Council - Environmental Health Department May 2016 Annual Rolling Update Harlow District Council - Environmental Health Department November 2014 Annual Rolling Update Uttlesford District Council - Environmental Health Department September 2014 Annual Rolling Update Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control Enforcements Brentwood Borough Council - Environmental Health Department March 2013 Variable Epping Forest District Council - Environmental Health Department May 2016 Variable Harlow District Council - Environmental Health Department November 2014 Variable Uttlesford District Council - Environmental Health Department September 2014 Variable Nearest Surface Water Feature Ordnance Survey September 2017 Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters Environment Agency - Thames Region September 1999 Not Applicable Prosecutions Relating to Authorised Processes Environment Agency - Anglian Region March 2013 As notified Environment Agency - Thames Region March 2013 As notified Prosecutions Relating to Controlled Waters Environment Agency - Anglian Region March 2013 As notified Environment Agency - Thames Region March 2013 As notified Registered Radioactive Substances Environment Agency - Anglian Region January 2015 Environment Agency - Thames Region January 2015 River Quality Environment Agency - Head Office November 2001 Not Applicable River Quality Biology Sampling Points Environment Agency - Head Office July 2012 Annually River Quality Chemistry Sampling Points Environment Agency - Head Office July 2012 Annually

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 35 of 42 Data Currency

Agency & Hydrological Version Update Cycle

Substantiated Pollution Incident Register Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Eastern Area July 2018 Quarterly Environment Agency - South East Region - North East Thames Area July 2018 Quarterly Environment Agency - Thames Region - North East Area July 2018 Quarterly Water Abstractions Environment Agency - Thames Region July 2018 Quarterly Water Industry Act Referrals Environment Agency - Anglian Region October 2017 Quarterly Environment Agency - Thames Region October 2017 Quarterly Groundwater Vulnerability Environment Agency - Head Office April 2015 Not Applicable Drift Deposits Environment Agency - Head Office January 1999 Not Applicable Bedrock Aquifer Designations British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service August 2015 As notified Superficial Aquifer Designations British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service August 2015 As notified Source Protection Zones Environment Agency - Head Office January 2018 Quarterly Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Environment Agency - Head Office May 2018 Quarterly Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences Environment Agency - Head Office May 2018 Quarterly Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences Environment Agency - Head Office May 2018 Quarterly Flood Water Storage Areas Environment Agency - Head Office May 2018 Quarterly Flood Defences Environment Agency - Head Office May 2018 Quarterly OS Water Network Lines Ordnance Survey May 2018 Quarterly Surface Water 1 in 30 year Flood Extent Environment Agency - Head Office October 2013 As notified Surface Water 1 in 100 year Flood Extent Environment Agency - Head Office October 2013 As notified Surface Water 1 in 1000 year Flood Extent Environment Agency - Head Office October 2013 As notified Surface Water Suitability Environment Agency - Head Office October 2013 As notified BGS Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service May 2013 As notified

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 36 of 42 Data Currency

Waste Version Update Cycle

BGS Recorded Landfill Sites British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service June 1996 Not Applicable Historical Landfill Sites Environment Agency - Head Office July 2018 Quarterly Integrated Pollution Control Registered Waste Sites Environment Agency - Anglian Region October 2008 Not Applicable Environment Agency - Thames Region October 2008 Not Applicable Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Landfill Boundaries) Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Eastern Area July 2018 Quarterly Environment Agency - South East Region - North East Thames Area July 2018 Quarterly Environment Agency - Thames Region - North East Area July 2018 Quarterly Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations) Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Eastern Area July 2018 Quarterly Environment Agency - South East Region - North East Thames Area July 2018 Quarterly Environment Agency - Thames Region - North East Area July 2018 Quarterly Local Authority Landfill Coverage Brentwood Borough Council May 2000 Not Applicable Epping Forest District Council May 2000 Not Applicable Essex County Council May 2000 Not Applicable Harlow District Council - Environmental Health Department May 2000 Not Applicable Uttlesford District Council - Environmental Health Department May 2000 Not Applicable Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites Brentwood Borough Council June 2003 Not Applicable Epping Forest District Council May 2000 Not Applicable Harlow District Council - Environmental Health Department May 2000 Not Applicable Uttlesford District Council - Environmental Health Department May 2000 Not Applicable Essex County Council November 2004 Not Applicable Potentially Infilled Land (Non-Water) Landmark Information Group Limited December 1999 Not Applicable Potentially Infilled Land (Water) Landmark Information Group Limited December 1999 Not Applicable Registered Landfill Sites Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Eastern Area March 2003 Not Applicable Environment Agency - Thames Region - North East Area March 2003 Not Applicable Registered Waste Transfer Sites Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Eastern Area March 2003 Not Applicable Environment Agency - Thames Region - North East Area March 2003 Not Applicable Registered Waste Treatment or Disposal Sites Environment Agency - Thames Region - North East Area June 2015 Not Applicable Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Eastern Area March 2003 Not Applicable

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 37 of 42 Data Currency

Hazardous Substances Version Update Cycle

Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH) Health and Safety Executive April 2018 Bi-Annually Explosive Sites Health and Safety Executive March 2017 Variable Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances (NIHHS) Health and Safety Executive November 2000 Not Applicable Planning Hazardous Substance Enforcements Brentwood Borough Council February 2016 Variable Epping Forest District Council - Planning Services February 2016 Variable Essex County Council February 2016 Variable Harlow District Council - Planning Services January 2016 Variable Uttlesford District Council - Planning Department October 2015 Variable Planning Hazardous Substance Consents Brentwood Borough Council February 2016 Variable Epping Forest District Council - Planning Services February 2016 Variable Essex County Council February 2016 Variable Harlow District Council - Planning Services January 2016 Variable Uttlesford District Council - Planning Department October 2015 Variable

Geological Version Update Cycle

BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service January 2009 Not Applicable BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service October 2015 As notified BGS Recorded Mineral Sites British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service May 2018 Bi-Annually CBSCB Compensation District Cheshire Brine Subsidence Compensation Board (CBSCB) August 2011 Not Applicable Coal Mining Affected Areas The Coal Authority - Property Searches March 2014 As notified Mining Instability Ove Arup & Partners October 2000 Not Applicable Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service May 2015 Not Applicable Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service June 2015 As notified Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service June 2015 As notified Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service June 2015 As notified Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service June 2015 As notified Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service June 2015 As notified Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service June 2015 As notified Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service July 2011 As notified Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service July 2011 As notified

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 38 of 42 Data Currency

Industrial Land Use Version Update Cycle

Contemporary Trade Directory Entries Thomson Directories May 2018 Quarterly Fuel Station Entries Catalist Ltd - Experian August 2018 Quarterly Gas Pipelines National Grid July 2014 Points of Interest - Commercial Services PointX September 2018 Quarterly Points of Interest - Education and Health PointX September 2018 Quarterly Points of Interest - Manufacturing and Production PointX September 2018 Quarterly Points of Interest - Public Infrastructure PointX September 2018 Quarterly Points of Interest - Recreational and Environmental PointX September 2018 Quarterly Underground Electrical Cables National Grid December 2015

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 39 of 42 Data Currency

Sensitive Land Use Version Update Cycle

Ancient Woodland Natural England August 2018 Bi-Annually Areas of Adopted Green Belt Brentwood Borough Council August 2018 As notified Epping Forest District Council - Planning Services August 2018 As notified Harlow District Council August 2018 As notified Uttlesford District Council August 2018 As notified Areas of Unadopted Green Belt Brentwood Borough Council August 2018 As notified Epping Forest District Council - Planning Services August 2018 As notified Harlow District Council August 2018 As notified Uttlesford District Council August 2018 As notified Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty Natural England August 2018 Bi-Annually Environmentally Sensitive Areas Natural England January 2017 Forest Parks Forestry Commission April 1997 Not Applicable Local Nature Reserves Natural England August 2018 Bi-Annually Marine Nature Reserves Natural England January 2018 Bi-Annually National Nature Reserves Natural England August 2018 Bi-Annually National Parks Natural England April 2017 Bi-Annually Nitrate Vulnerable Zones Environment Agency - Head Office December 2017 Bi-Annually Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA - formerly FRCA) October 2015 Ramsar Sites Natural England August 2018 Bi-Annually Sites of Special Scientific Interest Natural England February 2018 Bi-Annually Special Areas of Conservation Natural England August 2018 Bi-Annually Special Protection Areas Natural England August 2018 Bi-Annually

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 40 of 42 Data Suppliers

A selection of organisations who provide data within this report

Data Supplier Data Supplier Logo

Ordnance Survey

Environment Agency

Scottish Environment Protection Agency

The Coal Authority

British Geological Survey

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology

Natural Resources Wales

Scottish Natural Heritage

Natural England

Public Health England

Ove Arup

Peter Brett Associates

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 41 of 42 Useful Contacts

Contact Name and Address Contact Details

1 British Geological Survey - Enquiry Service Telephone: 0115 936 3143 Fax: 0115 936 3276 British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Email: [email protected] Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG12 5GG Website: www.bgs.ac.uk

2 Environment Agency - National Customer Contact Telephone: 03708 506 506 Centre (NCCC) Email: [email protected] PO Box 544, Templeborough, Rotherham, S60 1BY

3 Ordnance Survey Telephone: 03456 05 05 05 Email: [email protected] Adanac Drive, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 0AS Website: www.ordnancesurvey.gov.uk

4 Essex County Council Telephone: 01245 492211 Website: www.essexcc.gov.uk County Hall, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 1YS

5 Epping Forest District Council Website: www.eppingforestdc.gov.uk Civic Offices, 323 High Street, Epping, Essex, CM16 4BZ

6 Health and Safety Executive Website: www.hse.gov.uk 5S.2 Redgrave Court, Merton Road, Bootle, L20 7HS

7 Epping Forest District Council - Planning Services Telephone: 01992 564000 Fax: 01992 564229 Civic Offices, 323 High Street, Epping, Essex, CM16 4BZ Website: www.eppingforestdc.gov.uk

8 PointX Website: www.pointx.co.uk 7 Abbey Court, Eagle Way, Sowton, Exeter, Devon, EX2 7HY

9 Landmark Information Group Limited Telephone: 0844 844 9966 Fax: 0844 844 9951 Imperium, Imperial Way, Reading, Berkshire, RG2 0TD Email: [email protected] Website: www.landmark.co.uk

10 Natural England Telephone: 0300 060 3900 Email: [email protected] County Hall, Spetchley Road, Worcester, WR5 2NP Website: www.naturalengland.org.uk

11 Environment Agency - Head Office Telephone: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, Avon, BS32 4UD

- Public Health England - Radon Survey, Centre for Telephone: 01235 822622 Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Fax: 01235 833891 Email: [email protected] Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RQ Website: www.ukradon.org

- Landmark Information Group Limited Telephone: 0844 844 9952 Fax: 0844 844 9951 Imperium, Imperial Way, Reading, Berkshire, RG2 0TD Email: [email protected] Website: www.landmarkinfo.co.uk

Please note that the Environment Agency / Natural Resources Wales / SEPA have a charging policy in place for enquiries.

Order Number: 180755055_1_1 Date: 24-Sep-2018 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 42 of 42