DOCSLIB.ORG

Ijssel Discharge Increased from 12 to 17% of Rhine Flow Rate Due to the Operation of Three Lock Weirs in the Nederrijn in 1971; Van Aken, 2008)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ijssel Discharge Increased from 12 to 17% of Rhine Flow Rate Due to the Operation of Three Lock Weirs in the Nederrijn in 1971; Van Aken, 2008) Transfer times in the Rhine Delta (1900-2008): Lobith discharge & Wadden Sea salinity Impact of Dutch water management and climate variability on water transfer times through the Rhine Delta: linking Lobith discharge with Wadden Sea salinity from 1900 to 2008 Marijn van der Velde [email protected] IIASA – International Institute for Advanced Systems Analysis … with acknowledgements to Hendrik van Aken from NIOZ Contents • BACKGROUND • APPROACH & DATA SOURCES • RESULTS • IMPLICATIONS BROUGHT FROM CLIMATE CHANGE • CONCLUSIONS & PERSPECTIVES Dutch Water Management • Large-scale coastal infrastructures for protection against the sea including the closure-dike completed in 1932 resulting in the IJsselmeer • Mitigating river inundations and river navigability has been an important aim since the beginning of the 18 th Century • Recently, Dutch river management is focusing on giving more space to natural river systems for environmental and flooding-prevention reasons • Resulted in a significantly altered Dutch waterscape with an an impact on the transfer and retention times of water through the Lower Rhine Delta. Approach WADDEN SEA AT MARSDIEP (monthly, 1860 and onwards) CLOSURE DIKE COMPLETED 1932 RHINE AT LOBITH (daily, 1900 and onwards) Motivation Wadden Sea environment important ecosystem with specific species & biodiversity Subject to variable pressures including changing freshwater fluxes from land and projected sea level rise as well as anthropogenic impacts and water management interventions (e.g. closure dike) Restoration of the fresh-salt water transition zone (closure dike brought fresh-salt water interface within the Wadden Sea) Understanding interactions and controlling factors of the lower Rhine Delta – a complex system with many processes and actors - using a simple model Data Annual and interannual variability Monthly Daily Figure. Time series of Marsdiep salinity and Rhine discharge measured in Lobith (all monthly values). Methods Advantages of a simple ‘model’: • Representation of a complex system with many actors and interactions • Processes with large-scale temporal variation • Easy interpretation Link variability with transfer function: Objective function to get transfer time and σ : Source: van der Velde et al. GRL 2006 Three management periods Consider three ‘management’ periods: 1. 1900-1932 (when the closure-dike was completed) 2. 1933-1971 (with a ‘natural’ discharge rate of IJssel) 3. 1972-2008 (when IJssel discharge increased from 12 to 17% of Rhine flow rate due to the operation of three lock weirs in the Nederrijn in 1971; van Aken, 2008) In the latter period the Wadden Sea received about 100 m3s-1 more Rhine water via the river IJssel than in the earlier period, an increase of about 40%. Source: van Aken JoSR 2008 Three management periods Decreasing salinity Impact management? Increasing salinity variability Source: van Aken JoSR 2008 IJssel discharge 1932-1971 (with a ‘natural’ discharge rate) 1972-2008 (when IJssel discharge increased from 12 to 17% of Rhine flow rate In the latter period the Wadden Sea received about 100 m3s-1 more Rhine water via the river IJssel than in the earlier period, an increase of about 40%. Source: van Aken JoSR 2008 Results • Good agreement • ~5 year oscillation (R 2 = 0.76) Figure . Monthly measured variation in salinity in Marsdiep, and one-year running mean, and one-year running mean of modeled salinity using a transfer function approach with daily discharge measured at Lobith as input from 1901 to 2005. Results Figure . Time series of normalized measured daily discharge and normalized modelled daily reciprocal of salinity in the Marsdiep from 1901 to 2005 with a time-lag of 1.5 month. Results: 3 periods 1901-1931 1932-1971 1972-2005 Results: transfer functions 3 periods Travel Time St. Dev. (month) (month) 1901-2005 1.70 0.52 1901-1931 1.72 0.94 1932-1971 1.57 0.30 1972-2005 1.58 0.29 Changing seasonal behavior? Freshwater discharge Evaporation dominates dominates 0,8 0,6 0,4 Current situation after 1972 0,2 • Changing outlet scheme from lake IJssel? • Earlier spring melt? 0,0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101112 0,8 -0,2 0,6 1932-1971 1870-1931 0,4 change in monthly salinity (psu) salinity inmonthly change -0,4 0,2 0,0 -0,6 -0,2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101112 1972-2008 -0,4 -0,8 -0,6 -0,8 change in monthly salinity (psu) salinity inmonthly change -1,0 -1,2 Difference data-model: possible impacts? 1. Increased industrial activity after wars? 2. Salt mines? Land reclamation 3. After 1919 (Treaty of Versailles) and 1945 upstream policy changes France/Germany. 4. In 1940-45 increased of discharge to improve navigation from Germany (should be captured by model)? Deliberate flooding in the Netherlands? Implications brought from climate change • Increase in winter discharge (more winter precipitation) • Increase in spring discharge peak (lower snow buffer in Alps) • Decrease in summer discharge (less summer precipitation) Hurkmans et al. (2010) Conclusions & Perspectives • Good agreement salinity data and simple model • Changing seasonal salt-fresh dynamics • Impact closure dike on transport times (?) • Monthly analysis incomplete • Only monthly salinity data: where are the original daily data? Improve resolution! Suggestions? • Derive seasonal transfer functions! • Include salinity measured at Lobith to deduce impact of Rhine salt load on Wadden Sea (difficult to distinguish from the Wadden Sea getting fresher) • Include additional monitoring points from the Rhine, IJssel lake, and the Wadden Sea Questions & References van Aken, H.M., 2008. Variability of the salinity in the western Wadden Sea on tidal to centennial time scales. Journal of Sea Research 59, 121–132, doi:10.1016/j.seares.2007.11.001. van der Velde, M., Javaux, M., Vanclooster, M. and Clothier, B.E., 2006. El Niño-Southern Oscillation determines the salinity of the freshwater lens under a coral atoll in the Pacific Ocean. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L21403, doi:10.1029/2006GL027748. Please contact me: Marijn van der Velde [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Presentatie Bor Waal Merwede
    Bouwsteen Beeld op de Rivieren 24 november 2020 – Bouwdag Rijn 1 Ontwikkelperspectief Waal Merwede 24 november 2020 – Bouwdag Rijn 1 Ontwikkelperspectief Waal Merwede Trajecten Waal Merwede • Midden-Waal (Nijmegen - Tiel) • Beneden-Waal (Tiel - Woudrichem) • Boven-Merwede (Woudrichem – Werkendam) Wat bespreken we? • Oogst gezamenlijke werksessies • Richtinggevend perspectief gebruiksfuncties rivierengebied • Lange termijn (2050 en verder) • Strategische keuzen Hoe lees je de kaart? • Bekijk de kaart via de GIS viewer • Toekomstige gebruiksfuncties zijn met kleur aangegeven • Kansen en opgaven met * aangeduid, verbindingen met een pijl • Keuzes en dilemma’s weergegeven met icoontje Synthese Rijn Waterbeschikbaarheid • Belangrijkste strategische keuze: waterverdeling splitsingspunt. • Meer water via IJssel naar IJsselmeer in tijden van hoogwater (aanvullen buffer IJsselmeer) • Verplaatsen innamepunten Lek voor zoetwater wenselijk i.v.m. verzilting • Afbouwen drainage in buitendijkse gebieden i.v.m. langer vasthouden van water. Creëren van waterbuffers in bovenstroomse deel van het Nederlandse Rijnsysteem. (balans • droge/natte periodes). Natuur • Noodzakelijk om robuuste natuureenheden te realiseren • Splitsingspunt is belangrijke ecologische knooppunt. • Uiterwaarden Waal geschikt voor dynamische grootschalige natuur. Landbouw • Nederrijn + IJssel: mengvorm van landbouw en natuur mogelijk. Waterveiligheid • Tot 2050 zijn dijkversterkingen afdoende -> daarna meer richten op rivierverruiming. Meer water via IJssel betekent vergroten waterveiligheidsopgave
    [Show full text]
  • Castles Along the Rhine & Moselle, 5 Days
    CASTLES ALONG THE RHINE & MOSELLE Private Escorted Tour April 1 - October 20, 2021 - Departure any day 5 days / 4 nights: 1 night in Frankfurt, Liebenstein Castle, Ehrenburg Castle, Trier, Heidelberg Accommodation Meals Tours Transportation Transfer Not included 4* hotels in each city Breakfast daily in Tours throughout as Car or minival during entire tour. Arrival and City taxes in hotels each city. per itinerary. departure transfers to be paid on site English speaking guide during Admissions to entire tour. castles included Wine tasting Rates 2021 US$ per Person Day by Day Itinerary Day 1: The tour begins in Frankfurt and follows the Rhine to Rudesheim. Enjoy a sightseeing Hotel Class & Dates Twin Single tour of Rudesheim’s old historic center. Next we embark on a cruise and sail along the Rhine River, the Lorelei Valley. Disembark at Kamp-Bornhofen and ascend to Liebenstein 4* Hotel Castle, which towers high above the village and offers a beautiful view of the Rhine. April 1 - October 20 $3,569 $3,924 Accommodation in this 13th century castle. The rooms have been beautifully restored in medieval style. *Based on minimum 2 people traveling Day 2: After breakfast, travel to the ancient Roman city of Koblenz, one of the oldest cities in together. Germany. Then continue to the “Deutsches Eck” or German Corner, where the Moselle meets the Rhine. Cross the river in a panoramic cable car for a spectacular view. Visit the Liebenstein ← Frankfurt Ehrenbreitstein Fort, the second largest fort in Europe. Then continue along the Moselle ← river and the Ehrbachtal Valley. Ascend to Ehrenburg Castle for the Night.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the DUTCH DELTA MODEL for POLICY ANALYSIS on FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT in the NETHERLANDS R.M. Slomp1, J.P. De Waal2, E.F.W. Ruijg
    THE DUTCH DELTA MODEL FOR POLICY ANALYSIS ON FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE NETHERLANDS R.M. Slomp1, J.P. de Waal2, E.F.W. Ruijgh2, T. Kroon1, E. Snippen2, J.S.L.J. van Alphen3 1. Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment / Rijkswaterstaat 2. Deltares 3. Staff Delta Programme Commissioner ABSTRACT The Netherlands is located in a delta where the rivers Rhine, Meuse, Scheldt and Eems drain into the North Sea. Over the centuries floods have been caused by high river discharges, storms, and ice dams. In view of the changing climate the probability of flooding is expected to increase. Moreover, as the socio- economic developments in the Netherlands lead to further growth of private and public property, the possible damage as a result of flooding is likely to increase even more. The increasing flood risk has led the government to act, even though the Netherlands has not had a major flood since 1953. An integrated policy analysis study has been launched by the government called the Dutch Delta Programme. The Delta model is the integrated and consistent set of models to support long-term analyses of the various decisions in the Delta Programme. The programme covers the Netherlands, and includes flood risk analysis and water supply studies. This means the Delta model includes models for flood risk management as well as fresh water supply. In this paper we will discuss the models for flood risk management. The issues tackled were: consistent climate change scenarios for all water systems, consistent measures over the water systems, choice of the same proxies to evaluate flood probabilities and the reduction of computation and analysis time.
    [Show full text]
  • International Cooperation on the River Rhine
    International cooperation on the river Rhine Maarten Hofstra Unesco‐IHE/Water Governance Centre NL The Rhine river basin The Rhine = 3rd biggest European river 200.000 km² Outline •The Rhine: some chracteristics •The Netherlands as a downstream country •Early cooperation in the Rhine basin •Water pollution •Difficulties and conflicts •Flood protection •Ecological restauration •What makes cooperation work Cooperation in the Rhine basin Dutch border with: ‐Switzerland ‐Germany ‐France ‐Luxembourg ‐Netherlands The Rhine river basin Inhabitants Coblence – CIPR 58 Mio. Drinking water for 20 million people Main stream 1233 km Navigable 825 km from Basel/ Rheinfelden – Rotterdam RIZA RIZA Some hydrological characteristics of the Rhine Mean discharge Lobith: 2.200 m3/s Minimum in January Lowest discharge: 620 m3/s (1947, November) Extreme flood 1926, January: 12.600 m3/s Flood 1995, January: ca 12.000 m3/s Height difference Rotterdam‐Basel: 260 m The Netherlands as a downstream country International cooperation: Shipping on the River Rhine 1815: Congres of Vienna ‐ Free shipping ‐ Central committee for the River Rhine 1831 Act of Mainz 1868 Act of Mannheim 1963 Convention of Strassbourg International cooperation on prevention of pollution After World War 2: Pollution of the river leading to poor water quality International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) Switzerland, France, Germany, Luxemburg, Netherlands, European Community Established 1950 Confirmed 1963 Rhine action programme 1987 New Rhine Treaty 1‐1‐2003: Rhine 2020 ICPR:
    [Show full text]
  • Ijssel Bridge (Netherlands)
    mageba – Project information Ijssel Bridge (Netherlands) Project description 100 % mageba-owned subsidiary mageba- Highlights & facts The new Ijssel bridge was designed with Shanghai. Design requirements demanded bearings which should be able to take ver- the goal of replacing the old Hutch-Deck mageba products: tical loads up to approx. 62’000 kN, hori- bridge located in Zwolle, the Netherlands. Type: 36 RESTON®SPHERICAL With a longitude of more than 1‘000 m zontal loads of 20’000 kN and movements type KA and KE the new railway bridge shall improve the of 1‘050 mm. The largest bearing weighted Features: max. v-load 62‘000 kN connectivity of the railroad system of the approx. 5’000 kg. Design of bearings were max. h-load 20‘000 kN north-east axis. Design of superstructure carried out for each bearing independent- max. mov. 1‘050 mm is based on 18 independent segments. 18 ly in order to better suit client’s require- Installed: 2009 ments. Superstructure is supported by 19 axis equipped with spherical bearings ty- Structure: piers. On one axis adjacent to the river, the pes KA and KE support the complete su- City: Zwolle Bridge superstructure is fixed to the pier perstructure. The main bridge span, with Country: Netherlands through a monolithic connection. On all a length of approx. 150 m, allow the conti- Built: 2008–2010 other axis piers are equipped with respec- nues ship traffic improving the past traffic Type: Truss bridge tively one KA and one KE bearing allowing conditions. Length: 926 m bridge’s dilatation along both abutments Delivered products at each end of the bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Tussen Rijn En Lek 1981 3
    Tussen Rijn en Lek 1981 3. - Dl.15 3 - 3 - In waterstaatkundig opzicht had hij geen enkel belang noch bij hetbestaan noch bij het verdwijnen van de dam en het is de vraag of ookde graaf van Gelre zoveel baat zou hebben gehad bij een eventuele ver-wijdering, laat staan de graaf van Kleef. Het is niet onmogelijk, dat degraaf van Holland de graven van Gelre en Kleef er bij betrokken heeftom het geschil bewust te laten eskaleren. De enige, die er belang bijhad, dat de dam bij Wijk in stand bleef, was de bisschop van Utrecht.De graaf van Holland hoopte ongetwijfeld dat de bisschop toegeeflij-ker zou worden ten aanzien van het bestaan van de Zwammerdam,wanneer hij zelf het risico zou lopen, dat de afdamming van de Krom-me Rijn ongedaan zou moeten worden gemaakt op grond van dezelfdeargumenten als die, welke hij aanvoerde tegen de Zwammerdam.Te stellen dat de bisschop belang had bij de dam in de Kromme Rijn iseen voorbarig antwoord op de vraag naar het waarom van de afdam-ming. Een antwoord, dat overigens al door de oorkonde van 1165wordt gesuggereerd, waar als reden wordt opgegeven: bevrijding vanwateroverlast. Omdat dit antwoord gemakkelijker te preciseren valt alswij over meer gegevens van chronologische aard beschikken, is hetdienstig het leggen van de dam eerst wat nader in de tijd te situeren. Hetenige chronologische gegeven, dat de oorkonde van 1165 biedt, is datde dam antiquitus facta est. Hij lag er in 1165 vanouds, sinds mensen-heugenis; de toen levende generatie wist niet anders. Voorlopig kunnenwij het leggen van de dam dus dateren ten laatste in het eerste kwart vande 12e eeuw.
    [Show full text]
  • Infographic Over Het Operationeel Watermanagement Op De Nederrijn En Lek
    Infographic over het Operationeel Watermanagement op de Nederrijn en Lek Inleiding Deze infographic omvat een kaart van de Nederrijn, de Lek en enkele omliggende wateren. Daarin zijn feiten over het operationeel watermanagement opgenomen op de betreffende locatie. Dit zijn schutsluizen, inlaten, spuisluizen, gemalen, keersluizen, stormvloedkeringen en vismigratievoorzieningen. Ook zijn de meetlocaties en de streefpeilen weergegeven. Daarnaast is een uitgebreide toelichting gegeven over het operationeel waterbeheer op de Nederrijn en de Lek. Het Watersysteem De Nederrijn en de Lek zijn samen één van de drie Rijntakken. Ze zijn van stuwen voorzien om zo de waterverdeling tussen Nederrijn-Lek en de IJssel te kunnen beïnvloeden, en de waterstanden op eerstgenoemde riviertak te reguleren. Door het stuwbeheer wordt gezorgd voor voldoende zoetwateraanvoer naar het IJsselmeer en naar de omliggende gebieden, de chloride terugdringing in het benedenrivierengebied en voldoende waterdiepte voor de scheepvaart. Bovenstrooms Driel De Duitse Rijn komt bij Lobith binnen en gaat over in de Nederlandse Boven- Rijn. In Lobith wordt de waterafvoer en waterstand gemeten welke belangrijk is voor het hanteren van het stuwplan. Tussen Tolkamer en Millingen is het Bijlandsch Kanaal aangelegd. Deze gaat bij de Pannerdensche kop, over in de Waal en het Pannerdensch Kanaal. Bij normale en hoge afvoeren stroomt ongeveer twee derde van het water naar de Waal en één derde naar het Pannerdensch Kanaal. Het Pannerdensch Kanaal gaat over in de Nederrijn, en bij de IJsselkop splitst de IJssel zich van de Nederrijn af. De verdeling van het water bij de IJsselkop is afhankelijk van de stand van de stuw in Driel. Van Driel tot aan Hagestein In de Nederrijn en de Lek liggen 3 stuwen die volgens een stuwplan bediend worden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhine and Its Catchment: an Overview
    THE RHINE AND ITS CATCHMENT: AN OVERVIEW n Ecological Improvement n Chemical Water Quality n Survey of the Action Plan on Floods Internationale Kommission zum Schutz des Rheins Commission Internationale pour la Protection du Rhin Internationale Commissie ter Bescherming van de Rijn International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine 2 THE RHINE AND ITS CATCHMENT: AN OVERVIEW n Ecological Improvement n Chemical Water Quality n Survey of the Action Plan on Floods This report presents an overview over ecological improvement along For the EU countries, the EC Water Framework Directive (WFD), the River Rhine and its present chemical water quality. Furthermore, its daughter directives and the EC Floods Directive represent it contains a survey of the implementation of the Action Plan on essential tools for the implementation of the programme “Rhine Floods. 2020”. They imply a joint obligation of the EU states to take measures and emphasize the necessity of integrated management The contamination of the Rhine was the reason for founding the of rivers in river basin districts. International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) Furthermore, and since the last big floods of the Rhine in 1995, the in the 1950s. The Conventions on reducing the contamination by states in the Rhine catchment have invested more than 10 billion € chemicals and chlorides, the joint management of the Sandoz into flood prevention, flood protection and raising awareness for accident on 1st November 1986 and the consecutive activities of all floods in order to reduce flood risks and to thus improve the Rhine bordering countries aimed at sustainably securing the quality protection of man and goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverbank Protection Oude Ijssel Doetinchem, Netherlands
    Riverbank protection Oude IJssel Doetinchem, Netherlands Project owner Water authorities “Rijn en IJssel” Product EnkaMat® A20 Function Erosion protection Contractor Tezebo The banks of the river “Oude IJssel” were severely Solution damaged by erosion. To provide the river with green • Installation of EnkaMat A20 banks and protect them permanently against erosion, • Application of berms the water authorities “Rijn en IJssel” chose for the To provide the river with green banks and protect them installation of EnkaMat A20. permanently against erosion, the choice was made to install EnkaMat A20. This choice was partly based on Challenge good experiences already gained by the water authorities The “Oude IJssel” flows from Germany to the river IJssel in previous projects that included EnkaMat A20. in the Netherlands. It is a quiet and relatively small river that mainly drains collected rainwater from Germany. Prior to the installation of EnkaMat A20, the banks of the It is navigated by both recreational and commercial “Oude IJssel” were re-profiled and provided with a kind of vessels. water-side puddle. Apart from the grass seeds, also At Doetinchem, where the water flows at fairly constant reed- rhizomes were spread in the puddle to create a fine levels, the banks of the “Oude IJssel” were severely reeds vegetation. affected by erosion. The water authorities “Rijn en IJssel” decided to address the issue and proposed to execute repair works. www.enkasolutions.com Installation in September Easily cut to size Situation after installation Situation in Summer the year after Well vegetated bank within two years time Benefits of the solution Installation benefits EnkaMat A20 is a three-dimensional matting, pre-filled After having leveled and profiled the bank, long lengths of with chippings.
    [Show full text]
  • Half a Century of Morphological Change in the Haringvliet and Grevelingen Ebb-Tidal Deltas (SW Netherlands) - Impacts of Large-Scale Engineering 1964-2015
    Half a century of morphological change in the Haringvliet and Grevelingen ebb-tidal deltas (SW Netherlands) - Impacts of large-scale engineering 1964-2015 Ad J.F. van der Spek1,2; Edwin P.L. Elias3 1Deltares, P.O. Box 177, 2600 MH Delft, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht 3Deltares USA, 8070 Georgia Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20910, U.S.A.; [email protected] Abstract The estuaries in the SW Netherlands, a series of distributaries of the rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt known as the Dutch Delta, have been engineered to a large extent. The complete or partial damming of these estuaries in the nineteensixties had an enormous impact on their ebb-tidal deltas. The strong reduction of the cross-shore tidal flow triggered a series of morphological changes that includes erosion of the ebb delta front, the building of a coast-parallel, linear intertidal sand bar at the seaward edge of the delta platform and infilling of the tidal channels. The continuous extension of the port of Rotterdam in the northern part of the Haringvliet ebb-tidal delta increasingly sheltered the latter from the impact of waves from the northwest and north. This led to breaching and erosion of the shore-parallel bar. Moreover, large-scale sedimentation diminished the average depth in this area. The Grevelingen ebb-tidal delta has a more exposed position and has not reached this stage of bar breaching yet. The observed development of the ebb-tidal deltas caused by restriction or even blocking of the tidal flow in the associated estuary or tidal inlet is summarized in a conceptual model.
    [Show full text]
  • Painting in the Dutch Golden
    NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART | DIVISION OF EDUCATION Age Golden Dutch the in Painting DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PUBLICATIONS Painting in the Dutch Golden Age Classroom Guide Classroom Guide NATIO N AL GALLERY OF OF GALLERY AL A RT, WASHI RT, NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART NG WASHINGTON TO N Painting in the Dutch Golden Age Classroom Guide NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART, WASHINGTON Contents How to Use This Booklet 1 1 Profile of the Dutch Republic 3 BACKSTORY Topography 4 A Unique Land 5 The Challenges of Water Today 7 BACKSTORY Cities 8 Location, Location, Location 9 BACKSTORY Government 13 A New Republican Government 15 Parallels between Dutch and U.S. Independence 16 Terms, Supplemental Materials, and Other Resources 18 2 A Golden Age for the Arts 21 BACKSTORY 22 What Do You Know and What Can You See? 23 Why Do We Like It? 25 Forged! 27 Where We Look at Art 29 Stories behind the Art 29 Terms, Supplemental Materials, and Other Resources 30 3 Life in the City and Countryside 31 7 Portraiture 59 BACKSTORY 32 BACKSTORY 60 One Skater, Two Skaters... 35 Fashion, Attitude, and Setting — Then and Now 61 Seventeenth-Century Winters 36 What Might Each Picture Tell You about Terms and Other Resources 38 Its Subject? 63 Supplemental Materials and Other Resources 64 4 Landscape Painting 39 BACKSTORY 40 8 History Painting 65 Approaches to Landscape Painting 41 BACKSTORY 66 Narrative and Non-narrative Painting 43 Rembrandt and Biblical Stories 68 Terms and Supplemental Materials 44 Contrasting Narrative Strategies in History Painting 69 5 Genre Painting 45 Picturing the
    [Show full text]
  • Systeembeschrijving Beheersgebied Oude Ijssel Juli 2016
    Systeembeschrijving Beheersgebied Oude IJssel juli 2016 Systeembeschrijving beheersgebied Oude IJssel Inhoud Introductie in de systeembeschrijvingen ................................................................................................ 3 1 Samenvatting Beheersgebied Oude IJssel ....................................................................................... 4 2 Algemene informatie ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Gebiedsbegrenzing en indeling ............................................................................................... 9 2.2 Bodem en ondergrond .......................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Historie .................................................................................................................................. 15 2.4 Landschap en landgebruik ..................................................................................................... 19 2.5 Natuur.................................................................................................................................... 21 3 Watersysteem ............................................................................................................................... 24 3.1 Algemeen: Beheersgebied Oude IJssel .................................................................................. 24 3.2 Oude IJssel en Aastrang ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]