DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to D-Modules in Representation Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to D-Modules in Representation Theory Introduction to D-modules in representation theory Pavle Pandˇzi´c University of Zagreb and University of Freiburg 35th Winter School \Geometry and Physics" Srn´ı,January 2015. LECTURE I To a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, one can attach its flag variety B. B is a smooth projective algebraic variety. To study g-modules, one can instead study certain related D-modules on B. D-modules are sheaves of modules over the sheaves of differential operators. Goal B is a smooth projective algebraic variety. To study g-modules, one can instead study certain related D-modules on B. D-modules are sheaves of modules over the sheaves of differential operators. Goal To a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, one can attach its flag variety B. To study g-modules, one can instead study certain related D-modules on B. D-modules are sheaves of modules over the sheaves of differential operators. Goal To a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, one can attach its flag variety B. B is a smooth projective algebraic variety. D-modules are sheaves of modules over the sheaves of differential operators. Goal To a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, one can attach its flag variety B. B is a smooth projective algebraic variety. To study g-modules, one can instead study certain related D-modules on B. Goal To a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, one can attach its flag variety B. B is a smooth projective algebraic variety. To study g-modules, one can instead study certain related D-modules on B. D-modules are sheaves of modules over the sheaves of differential operators. I Can study them in local coordinates; I Can use geometric constructions like inverse and direct images; I Have geometric invariants like support or characteristic variety. Advantages of sheaves: I Can use geometric constructions like inverse and direct images; I Have geometric invariants like support or characteristic variety. Advantages of sheaves: I Can study them in local coordinates; I Have geometric invariants like support or characteristic variety. Advantages of sheaves: I Can study them in local coordinates; I Can use geometric constructions like inverse and direct images; Advantages of sheaves: I Can study them in local coordinates; I Can use geometric constructions like inverse and direct images; I Have geometric invariants like support or characteristic variety. I to introduce and study D-modules; I to show how D-modules are related to g-modules. References for most of what we will do can be found on Dragan Miliˇci´c'shomepage http://www.math.utah.edu/~milicic The aim of these lectures is: I to show how D-modules are related to g-modules. References for most of what we will do can be found on Dragan Miliˇci´c'shomepage http://www.math.utah.edu/~milicic The aim of these lectures is: I to introduce and study D-modules; References for most of what we will do can be found on Dragan Miliˇci´c'shomepage http://www.math.utah.edu/~milicic The aim of these lectures is: I to introduce and study D-modules; I to show how D-modules are related to g-modules. The aim of these lectures is: I to introduce and study D-modules; I to show how D-modules are related to g-modules. References for most of what we will do can be found on Dragan Miliˇci´c'shomepage http://www.math.utah.edu/~milicic n Let D(n) be the Weyl algebra of differential operators on C with polynomial coefficients. The algebra D(n) is generated by the partial derivatives @1;:::;@n and by the multiplication operators x1;:::; xn. These generators satisfy the commutation relations xi xj = xj xi ; @i @j = @j @i ; @i xj − xj @i = δij : The nontrivial relations come from the Leibniz rule: @i (xj P) = @i (xj )P + xj @i (P): The Weyl algebra The algebra D(n) is generated by the partial derivatives @1;:::;@n and by the multiplication operators x1;:::; xn. These generators satisfy the commutation relations xi xj = xj xi ; @i @j = @j @i ; @i xj − xj @i = δij : The nontrivial relations come from the Leibniz rule: @i (xj P) = @i (xj )P + xj @i (P): The Weyl algebra n Let D(n) be the Weyl algebra of differential operators on C with polynomial coefficients. These generators satisfy the commutation relations xi xj = xj xi ; @i @j = @j @i ; @i xj − xj @i = δij : The nontrivial relations come from the Leibniz rule: @i (xj P) = @i (xj )P + xj @i (P): The Weyl algebra n Let D(n) be the Weyl algebra of differential operators on C with polynomial coefficients. The algebra D(n) is generated by the partial derivatives @1;:::;@n and by the multiplication operators x1;:::; xn. The nontrivial relations come from the Leibniz rule: @i (xj P) = @i (xj )P + xj @i (P): The Weyl algebra n Let D(n) be the Weyl algebra of differential operators on C with polynomial coefficients. The algebra D(n) is generated by the partial derivatives @1;:::;@n and by the multiplication operators x1;:::; xn. These generators satisfy the commutation relations xi xj = xj xi ; @i @j = @j @i ; @i xj − xj @i = δij : The Weyl algebra n Let D(n) be the Weyl algebra of differential operators on C with polynomial coefficients. The algebra D(n) is generated by the partial derivatives @1;:::;@n and by the multiplication operators x1;:::; xn. These generators satisfy the commutation relations xi xj = xj xi ; @i @j = @j @i ; @i xj − xj @i = δij : The nontrivial relations come from the Leibniz rule: @i (xj P) = @i (xj )P + xj @i (P): The algebra D(1) is generated by x and @, with relation [@; x] = 1. A crucial remark is that D(1) cannot have any finite-dimensional modules. Namely, if M were a finite-dimensional D(1)-module, then the operator [@; x] on M would have trace 0, while the operator 1 would have trace dim M, a contradiction. Examples: D(1) A crucial remark is that D(1) cannot have any finite-dimensional modules. Namely, if M were a finite-dimensional D(1)-module, then the operator [@; x] on M would have trace 0, while the operator 1 would have trace dim M, a contradiction. Examples: D(1) The algebra D(1) is generated by x and @, with relation [@; x] = 1. Namely, if M were a finite-dimensional D(1)-module, then the operator [@; x] on M would have trace 0, while the operator 1 would have trace dim M, a contradiction. Examples: D(1) The algebra D(1) is generated by x and @, with relation [@; x] = 1. A crucial remark is that D(1) cannot have any finite-dimensional modules. Examples: D(1) The algebra D(1) is generated by x and @, with relation [@; x] = 1. A crucial remark is that D(1) cannot have any finite-dimensional modules. Namely, if M were a finite-dimensional D(1)-module, then the operator [@; x] on M would have trace 0, while the operator 1 would have trace dim M, a contradiction. An obvious example of a D(1)-module is the space of polynomials C[x], where elements of D(1) act by definition. This module is \smaller" and more interesting than D(1) with left multiplication. Another \small" example: truncated Laurent polynomials −1 C[x; x ]=C[x]. (These can be moved to any c 2 C.) Another way to describe an isomorphic module is as C[@], with @ · @i = @i+1; x · @i = −i@i−1: (\Fourier transform" of C[x].) Examples: D(1)-modules This module is \smaller" and more interesting than D(1) with left multiplication. Another \small" example: truncated Laurent polynomials −1 C[x; x ]=C[x]. (These can be moved to any c 2 C.) Another way to describe an isomorphic module is as C[@], with @ · @i = @i+1; x · @i = −i@i−1: (\Fourier transform" of C[x].) Examples: D(1)-modules An obvious example of a D(1)-module is the space of polynomials C[x], where elements of D(1) act by definition. Another \small" example: truncated Laurent polynomials −1 C[x; x ]=C[x]. (These can be moved to any c 2 C.) Another way to describe an isomorphic module is as C[@], with @ · @i = @i+1; x · @i = −i@i−1: (\Fourier transform" of C[x].) Examples: D(1)-modules An obvious example of a D(1)-module is the space of polynomials C[x], where elements of D(1) act by definition. This module is \smaller" and more interesting than D(1) with left multiplication. Another way to describe an isomorphic module is as C[@], with @ · @i = @i+1; x · @i = −i@i−1: (\Fourier transform" of C[x].) Examples: D(1)-modules An obvious example of a D(1)-module is the space of polynomials C[x], where elements of D(1) act by definition. This module is \smaller" and more interesting than D(1) with left multiplication. Another \small" example: truncated Laurent polynomials −1 C[x; x ]=C[x]. (These can be moved to any c 2 C.) Examples: D(1)-modules An obvious example of a D(1)-module is the space of polynomials C[x], where elements of D(1) act by definition. This module is \smaller" and more interesting than D(1) with left multiplication. Another \small" example: truncated Laurent polynomials −1 C[x; x ]=C[x]. (These can be moved to any c 2 C.) Another way to describe an isomorphic module is as C[@], with @ · @i = @i+1; x · @i = −i@i−1: (\Fourier transform" of C[x].) Since D(2) = D(1) ⊗ D(1), one can consider modules of the form M1 ⊗ M2, where Mi are D(1)-modules.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Sheaves of Algebras
    Special Sheaves of Algebras Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Sheaves of Tensor Algebras 1 3 Sheaves of Symmetric Algebras 6 4 Sheaves of Exterior Algebras 9 5 Sheaves of Polynomial Algebras 17 6 Sheaves of Ideal Products 21 1 Introduction In this note “ring” means a not necessarily commutative ring. If A is a commutative ring then an A-algebra is a ring morphism A −→ B whose image is contained in the center of B. We allow noncommutative sheaves of rings, but if we say (X, OX ) is a ringed space then we mean OX is a sheaf of commutative rings. Throughout this note (X, OX ) is a ringed space. Associated to this ringed space are the following categories: Mod(X), GrMod(X), Alg(X), nAlg(X), GrAlg(X), GrnAlg(X) We show that the forgetful functors Alg(X) −→ Mod(X) and nAlg(X) −→ Mod(X) have left adjoints. If A is a nonzero commutative ring, the forgetful functors AAlg −→ AMod and AnAlg −→ AMod have left adjoints given by the symmetric algebra and tensor algebra con- structions respectively. 2 Sheaves of Tensor Algebras Let F be a sheaf of OX -modules, and for an open set U let P (U) be the OX (U)-algebra given by the tensor algebra T (F (U)). That is, ⊗2 P (U) = OX (U) ⊕ F (U) ⊕ F (U) ⊕ · · · For an inclusion V ⊆ U let ρ : OX (U) −→ OX (V ) and η : F (U) −→ F (V ) be the morphisms of abelian groups given by restriction. For n ≥ 2 we define a multilinear map F (U) × · · · × F (U) −→ F (V ) ⊗ · · · ⊗ F (V ) (m1, .
    [Show full text]
  • SHEAVES of MODULES 01AC Contents 1. Introduction 1 2
    SHEAVES OF MODULES 01AC Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Pathology 2 3. The abelian category of sheaves of modules 2 4. Sections of sheaves of modules 4 5. Supports of modules and sections 6 6. Closed immersions and abelian sheaves 6 7. A canonical exact sequence 7 8. Modules locally generated by sections 8 9. Modules of finite type 9 10. Quasi-coherent modules 10 11. Modules of finite presentation 13 12. Coherent modules 15 13. Closed immersions of ringed spaces 18 14. Locally free sheaves 20 15. Bilinear maps 21 16. Tensor product 22 17. Flat modules 24 18. Duals 26 19. Constructible sheaves of sets 27 20. Flat morphisms of ringed spaces 29 21. Symmetric and exterior powers 29 22. Internal Hom 31 23. Koszul complexes 33 24. Invertible modules 33 25. Rank and determinant 36 26. Localizing sheaves of rings 38 27. Modules of differentials 39 28. Finite order differential operators 43 29. The de Rham complex 46 30. The naive cotangent complex 47 31. Other chapters 50 References 52 1. Introduction 01AD This is a chapter of the Stacks Project, version 77243390, compiled on Sep 28, 2021. 1 SHEAVES OF MODULES 2 In this chapter we work out basic notions of sheaves of modules. This in particular includes the case of abelian sheaves, since these may be viewed as sheaves of Z- modules. Basic references are [Ser55], [DG67] and [AGV71]. We work out what happens for sheaves of modules on ringed topoi in another chap- ter (see Modules on Sites, Section 1), although there we will mostly just duplicate the discussion from this chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentials
    Section 2.8 - Differentials Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In this section we will define the sheaf of relative differential forms of one scheme over another. In the case of a nonsingular variety over C, which is like a complex manifold, the sheaf of differential forms is essentially the same as the dual of the tangent bundle in differential geometry. However, in abstract algebraic geometry, we will define the sheaf of differentials first, by a purely algebraic method, and then define the tangent bundle as its dual. Hence we will begin this section with a review of the module of differentials of one ring over another. As applications of the sheaf of differentials, we will give a characterisation of nonsingular varieties among schemes of finite type over a field. We will also use the sheaf of differentials on a nonsingular variety to define its tangent sheaf, its canonical sheaf, and its geometric genus. This latter is an important numerical invariant of a variety. Contents 1 K¨ahler Differentials 1 2 Sheaves of Differentials 2 3 Nonsingular Varieties 13 4 Rational Maps 16 5 Applications 19 6 Some Local Algebra 22 1 K¨ahlerDifferentials See (MAT2,Section 2) for the definition and basic properties of K¨ahler differentials. Definition 1. Let B be a local ring with maximal ideal m.A field of representatives for B is a subfield L of A which is mapped onto A/m by the canonical mapping A −→ A/m. Since L is a field, the restriction gives an isomorphism of fields L =∼ A/m. Proposition 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lie Algebroid Cohomology As a Derived Functor
    LIE ALGEBROID COHOMOLOGY AS A DERIVED FUNCTOR Ugo Bruzzo Area di Matematica, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA), Via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste, Italy; Department of Mathematics, University of Pennsylvania, 209 S 33rd st., Philadelphia, PA 19104-6315, USA; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste Abstract. We show that the hypercohomology of the Chevalley-Eilenberg- de Rham complex of a Lie algebroid L over a scheme with coefficients in an L -module can be expressed as a derived functor. We use this fact to study a Hochschild-Serre type spectral sequence attached to an extension of Lie alge- broids. Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Generalities on Lie algebroids 3 3. Cohomology as derived functor 7 4. A Hochshild-Serre spectral sequence 11 References 16 arXiv:1606.02487v4 [math.RA] 14 Apr 2017 Date: Revised 14 April 2017 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 14F40, 18G40, 32L10, 55N35, 55T05 Keywords: Lie algebroid cohomology, derived functors, spectral sequences Research partly supported by indam-gnsaga. u.b. is a member of the vbac group. 1 2 1. Introduction As it is well known, the cohomology groups of a Lie algebra g over a ring A with coeffi- cients in a g-module M can be computed directly from the Chevalley-Eilenberg complex, or as the derived functors of the invariant submodule functor, i.e., the functor which with ever g-module M associates the submodule of M M g = {m ∈ M | ρ(g)(m)=0}, where ρ: g → End A(M) is a representation of g (see e.g. [16]). In this paper we show an analogous result for the hypercohomology of the Chevalley-Eilenberg-de Rham complex of a Lie algebroid L over a scheme X, with coefficients in a representation M of L (the notion of hypercohomology is recalled in Section 2).
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Sheaves of Modules, Vector Bundles, and (Quasi-)Coherent Sheaves
    4 Sheaves of modules, vector bundles, and (quasi-)coherent sheaves “If you believe a ring can be understood geometrically as functions its spec- trum, then modules help you by providing more functions with which to measure and characterize its spectrum.” – Andrew Critch, from MathOver- flow.net So far we discussed general properties of sheaves, in particular, of rings. Similar as in the module theory in abstract algebra, the notion of sheaves of modules allows us to increase our understanding of a given ringed space (or a scheme), and to provide further techniques to play with functions, or function-like objects. There are particularly important notions, namely, quasi-coherent and coherent sheaves. They are analogous notions of the usual modules (respectively, finitely generated modules) over a given ring. They also generalize the notion of vector bundles. Definition 38. Let (X, ) be a ringed space. A sheaf of -modules, or simply an OX OX -module, is a sheaf on X such that OX F (i) the group (U) is an (U)-module for each open set U X; F OX ✓ (ii) the restriction map (U) (V ) is compatible with the module structure via the F !F ring homomorphism (U) (V ). OX !OX A morphism of -modules is a morphism of sheaves such that the map (U) F!G OX F ! (U) is an (U)-module homomorphism for every open U X. G OX ✓ Example 39. Let (X, ) be a ringed space, , be -modules, and let ' : OX F G OX F!G be a morphism. Then ker ', im ', coker ' are again -modules. If is an - OX F 0 ✓F OX submodule, then the quotient sheaf / is an -module.
    [Show full text]
  • On Sheaf Theory
    Lectures on Sheaf Theory by C.H. Dowker Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Bombay 1957 Lectures on Sheaf Theory by C.H. Dowker Notes by S.V. Adavi and N. Ramabhadran Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Bombay 1956 Contents 1 Lecture 1 1 2 Lecture 2 5 3 Lecture 3 9 4 Lecture 4 15 5 Lecture 5 21 6 Lecture 6 27 7 Lecture 7 31 8 Lecture 8 35 9 Lecture 9 41 10 Lecture 10 47 11 Lecture 11 55 12 Lecture 12 59 13 Lecture 13 65 14 Lecture 14 73 iii iv Contents 15 Lecture 15 81 16 Lecture 16 87 17 Lecture 17 93 18 Lecture 18 101 19 Lecture 19 107 20 Lecture 20 113 21 Lecture 21 123 22 Lecture 22 129 23 Lecture 23 135 24 Lecture 24 139 25 Lecture 25 143 26 Lecture 26 147 27 Lecture 27 155 28 Lecture 28 161 29 Lecture 29 167 30 Lecture 30 171 31 Lecture 31 177 32 Lecture 32 183 33 Lecture 33 189 Lecture 1 Sheaves. 1 onto Definition. A sheaf S = (S, τ, X) of abelian groups is a map π : S −−−→ X, where S and X are topological spaces, such that 1. π is a local homeomorphism, 2. for each x ∈ X, π−1(x) is an abelian group, 3. addition is continuous. That π is a local homeomorphism means that for each point p ∈ S , there is an open set G with p ∈ G such that π|G maps G homeomorphi- cally onto some open set π(G).
    [Show full text]
  • The Algebraic Theory of D-Modules
    THE ALGEBRAIC THEORY OF D-MODULES DMITRY GOUREVITCH Abstract. These are draft notes of the course I gave in fall semester 2015 at the Weizmann Institute of Science, under the guidance of Joseph Bernstein. Notes by Alexander Shamov. Typos are probable, mistakes possible, comments welcome. Contents 1. D-modules on affine spaces 1 1.1. Dimension 2 1.2. Proof of Bernstein’s inequality 4 2. Holonomic modules, and an application. 5 2.1. Another proof of Bernstein inequality 5 3. Associated varieties and singular support 7 3.1. Digression on several definitions of dimension of algebraic varieties 8 3.2. The geometric filtration 9 3.3. Involutivity of the associated variety 9 3.4. Irreducible non-holonomic Dn-modules 10 4. Operations on D-modules 10 5. Homological properties 13 6. D-modules on smooth affine varieties 18 7. D-modules on general separated smooth varieties 20 8. Kashiwara’s lemma and its corollaries 21 8.1. Corollaries 22 9. D-modules on the projective space 24 9.1. Twisted differential operators on the projective space 25 10. The Bernstein-Kashiwara theorem on distributional solutions of holonomic modules 26 10.1. Proof of Theorem 10.6 29 11. Derived categories 30 References 34 1. D-modules on affine spaces Notation 1.1. Dn := hx1, . , xn, ∂1, . , ∂ni is the algebra of polynomial differential operators. Definition 1.2. Let M be a finitely generated Dn-module. Then a solution of M is a ∞ n −∞ n homomorphism from M to some Dn-module of functions (say, C (R ) or C (R )).
    [Show full text]
  • D-Modules and Representation Theory
    D-Modules and Representation Theory Part III Essay Topic 96 D-MODULES AND REPRESENTATION THEORY Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Motivation 1 1.2. Organization and references 2 1.3. Conventions and notation 3 1.4. Acknowledgments 3 2. D-modules on smooth algebraic varieties 3 2.1. Definition and examples 3 2.2. Left and right D-modules 6 2.3. Pullback and pushforward of D-modules 8 2.4. The singular support 14 2.5. Holonomic D-modules and duality 17 2.6. D-modules on P1 21 3. The geometric setting 23 3.1. Preliminaries on semisimple algebraic groups 24 3.2. Flag and Schubert varieties 24 3.3. Equivariant vector bundles on the flag variety 24 3.4. Preliminaries on Lie algebras 26 3.5. Lie algebra actions on G-equivariant sheaves 26 3.6. Chevalley and Harish-Chandra isomorphisms 27 4. Beilinson-Bernstein localization 30 4.1. Twisted differential operators 30 4.2. Lie algebroids and enveloping algebras on the flag variety 31 4.3. A family of twisted differential operators 32 4.4. The localization functor and the localization theorem 33 λ 4.5. The map U(g) ! Γ(X; DX ) 35 4.6. The geometry of the nilpotent cone and Kostant's Theorem 36 4.7. The global sections functor on the flag variety 41 References 44 1. Introduction 1.1. Motivation. Let X be a smooth algebraic variety over a field of characteristic 0. This essay will be primarily concerned with D-modules, or modules over a sheaf D of differential operators defined on X.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relative Proj Construction
    The Relative Proj Construction Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 Earlier we defined the Proj of a graded ring. In these notes we introduce a relative version of this construction, which is the Proj of a sheaf of graded algebras S over a scheme X. This construction is useful in particular because it allows us to construct the projective space bundle associated to a locally free sheaf E , and it allows us to give a definition of blowing up with respect to an arbitrary sheaf of ideals. Contents 1 Relative Proj 1 2 The Sheaf Associated to a Graded Module 5 2.1 Quasi-Structures ..................................... 14 3 The Graded Module Associated to a Sheaf 15 3.1 Ring Structure ...................................... 21 4 Functorial Properties 21 5 Ideal Sheaves and Closed Subchemes 25 6 The Duple Embedding 27 7 Twisting With Invertible Sheaves 31 8 Projective Space Bundles 36 1 Relative Proj See our Sheaves of Algebras notes (SOA) for the definition of sheaves of algebras, sheaves of graded algebras and their basic properties. In particular note that a sheaf of algebras (resp. graded algebras) is not necessarily commutative. Although in SOA we deal with noncommutative algebras over a ring, here “A-algebra” will refer to a commutative algebra over a commutative ring A. Example 1. Let X be a scheme and F a sheaf of modules on X. In our Special Sheaves of Algebras (SSA) notes we defined the following structures: • The relative tensor algebra T(F ), which is a sheaf of graded OX -algebras with the property 0 that T (F ) = OX .
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction There will be no specific text in mind. Sources include Griffiths and Harris as well as Hartshorne. Others include Mumford's "Red Book" and "AG I- Complex Projective Varieties", Shafarevich's Basic AG, among other possibilities. We will be taught to the test: that is, we will be being prepared to take orals on AG. This means we will de-emphasize proofs and do lots of examples and applications. So the focus will be techniques for the first semester, and the second will be topics from modern research. 1. Techniques of Algebraic Geometry (a) Varieties and Sheaves on Varieties i. Cohomology, the basic tool for studying these (we will start this early) ii. Direct Images (and higher direct images) iii. Base Change iv. Derived Categories (b) Topology of Complex Algebraic Varieties i. DeRham Theorem ii. Hodge Theorem iii. K¨ahlerPackage iv. Spectral Sequences (Specifically Leray) v. Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch (c) Deformation Theory and Moduli Spaces (d) Toric Geometry (e) Curves, Jacobians, Abelian Varieties and Analytic Theory of Theta Functions (f) Elliptic Curves and Elliptic fibrations (g) Classification of Surfaces (h) Singularities, Blow-Up, Resolution of Singularities 2. Problems in AG (mostly second semester) (a) Torelli and Schottky Problems: The Torelli question is "Is the map that takes a curve to its Jacobian injective?" and the Schottky Prob- lem is "Which abelian varieties come from curves?" (b) Hodge Conjecture: "Given an algebraic variety, describe the subva- rieties via cohomology." (c) Class Field Theory/Geometric Langlands Program: (Curves, Vector Bundles, moduli, etc) Complicated to state the conjectures. (d) Classification in Dim ≥ 3/Mori Program (We will not be talking much about this) 1 (e) Classification and Study of Calabi-Yau Manifolds (f) Lots of problems on moduli spaces i.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex. Theory of Sheaves. Notion of Coherence
    Annex. Theory of Sheaves. Notion of Coherence In this Annex we collect general facts about sheaves to that extent as is necessary for the purposes of this book. We mention [TAG], [FAC] and [TF] as standard references related to the material here. Parts of this Annex overlap with Chapter A.O of [TSS]. We introduce the notion of a sheaf in the way we learned it in HIRZEBRUCH'S lectures held in 1954 at MUnster. Thus for us sheaves are primarily covering spaces (espaces etales). Needless to say that in many concrete cases we construct sheaves by means of presheaves. "Tantot Ie point de vue des faisceaux est plus commode, tantot c'est Ie point de vue des espaces etales" [CAR], p.825. Main emphasis is put on the notion of a coherent sheaf. The yoga of such sheaves is developed as in [FAC]; of utmost importance for Complex Analysis is the Extension Principle 4.3. §O. Sheaves We introduce the notion of a sheaf of sets and discuss basic properties. By X, Y we denote arbitrary topological spaces. 1. Sheaves and Morphisms. A pair (g, n) conslstmg of a topological space [/ and a local homeomorphism n: [/ -+ X from [/ into X is called a sheaf (of sets) on X. Instead of (g, n) we mostly just write Y. It follows that the projection n is open and that every stalk ~:=n-l(x), XEX, of [/ is a discrete and closed subset of Y. If ([/', n') and (g, n) are sheaves on X a continuous map ({J: [/' -+[/ is called a (sheaf) morphism if no ({J = n'.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTRUCTIONS of SCHEMES 01LE Contents
    CONSTRUCTIONS OF SCHEMES 01LE Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Relative glueing 1 3. Relative spectrum via glueing 4 4. Relative spectrum as a functor 5 5. Affine n-space 8 6. Vector bundles 8 7. Cones 9 8. Proj of a graded ring 10 9. Quasi-coherent sheaves on Proj 16 10. Invertible sheaves on Proj 17 11. Functoriality of Proj 20 12. Morphisms into Proj 24 13. Projective space 28 14. Invertible sheaves and morphisms into Proj 32 15. Relative Proj via glueing 33 16. Relative Proj as a functor 35 17. Quasi-coherent sheaves on relative Proj 40 18. Functoriality of relative Proj 42 19. Invertible sheaves and morphisms into relative Proj 43 20. Twisting by invertible sheaves and relative Proj 44 21. Projective bundles 45 22. Grassmannians 48 23. Other chapters 50 References 51 1. Introduction 01LF In this chapter we introduce ways of constructing schemes out of others. A basic reference is [DG67]. 2. Relative glueing 01LG The following lemma is relevant in case we are trying to construct a scheme X over S, and we already know how to construct the restriction of X to the affine opens of S. The actual result is completely general and works in the setting of (locally) ringed spaces, although our proof is written in the language of schemes. This is a chapter of the Stacks Project, version 77243390, compiled on Sep 28, 2021. 1 CONSTRUCTIONS OF SCHEMES 2 01LH Lemma 2.1. Let S be a scheme. Let B be a basis for the topology of S. Suppose given the following data: (1) For every U ∈ B a scheme fU : XU → U over U.
    [Show full text]