Introduction to D-Modules in Representation Theory

Introduction to D-Modules in Representation Theory

Introduction to D-modules in representation theory Pavle Pandˇzi´c University of Zagreb and University of Freiburg 35th Winter School \Geometry and Physics" Srn´ı,January 2015. LECTURE I To a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, one can attach its flag variety B. B is a smooth projective algebraic variety. To study g-modules, one can instead study certain related D-modules on B. D-modules are sheaves of modules over the sheaves of differential operators. Goal B is a smooth projective algebraic variety. To study g-modules, one can instead study certain related D-modules on B. D-modules are sheaves of modules over the sheaves of differential operators. Goal To a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, one can attach its flag variety B. To study g-modules, one can instead study certain related D-modules on B. D-modules are sheaves of modules over the sheaves of differential operators. Goal To a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, one can attach its flag variety B. B is a smooth projective algebraic variety. D-modules are sheaves of modules over the sheaves of differential operators. Goal To a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, one can attach its flag variety B. B is a smooth projective algebraic variety. To study g-modules, one can instead study certain related D-modules on B. Goal To a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, one can attach its flag variety B. B is a smooth projective algebraic variety. To study g-modules, one can instead study certain related D-modules on B. D-modules are sheaves of modules over the sheaves of differential operators. I Can study them in local coordinates; I Can use geometric constructions like inverse and direct images; I Have geometric invariants like support or characteristic variety. Advantages of sheaves: I Can use geometric constructions like inverse and direct images; I Have geometric invariants like support or characteristic variety. Advantages of sheaves: I Can study them in local coordinates; I Have geometric invariants like support or characteristic variety. Advantages of sheaves: I Can study them in local coordinates; I Can use geometric constructions like inverse and direct images; Advantages of sheaves: I Can study them in local coordinates; I Can use geometric constructions like inverse and direct images; I Have geometric invariants like support or characteristic variety. I to introduce and study D-modules; I to show how D-modules are related to g-modules. References for most of what we will do can be found on Dragan Miliˇci´c'shomepage http://www.math.utah.edu/~milicic The aim of these lectures is: I to show how D-modules are related to g-modules. References for most of what we will do can be found on Dragan Miliˇci´c'shomepage http://www.math.utah.edu/~milicic The aim of these lectures is: I to introduce and study D-modules; References for most of what we will do can be found on Dragan Miliˇci´c'shomepage http://www.math.utah.edu/~milicic The aim of these lectures is: I to introduce and study D-modules; I to show how D-modules are related to g-modules. The aim of these lectures is: I to introduce and study D-modules; I to show how D-modules are related to g-modules. References for most of what we will do can be found on Dragan Miliˇci´c'shomepage http://www.math.utah.edu/~milicic n Let D(n) be the Weyl algebra of differential operators on C with polynomial coefficients. The algebra D(n) is generated by the partial derivatives @1;:::;@n and by the multiplication operators x1;:::; xn. These generators satisfy the commutation relations xi xj = xj xi ; @i @j = @j @i ; @i xj − xj @i = δij : The nontrivial relations come from the Leibniz rule: @i (xj P) = @i (xj )P + xj @i (P): The Weyl algebra The algebra D(n) is generated by the partial derivatives @1;:::;@n and by the multiplication operators x1;:::; xn. These generators satisfy the commutation relations xi xj = xj xi ; @i @j = @j @i ; @i xj − xj @i = δij : The nontrivial relations come from the Leibniz rule: @i (xj P) = @i (xj )P + xj @i (P): The Weyl algebra n Let D(n) be the Weyl algebra of differential operators on C with polynomial coefficients. These generators satisfy the commutation relations xi xj = xj xi ; @i @j = @j @i ; @i xj − xj @i = δij : The nontrivial relations come from the Leibniz rule: @i (xj P) = @i (xj )P + xj @i (P): The Weyl algebra n Let D(n) be the Weyl algebra of differential operators on C with polynomial coefficients. The algebra D(n) is generated by the partial derivatives @1;:::;@n and by the multiplication operators x1;:::; xn. The nontrivial relations come from the Leibniz rule: @i (xj P) = @i (xj )P + xj @i (P): The Weyl algebra n Let D(n) be the Weyl algebra of differential operators on C with polynomial coefficients. The algebra D(n) is generated by the partial derivatives @1;:::;@n and by the multiplication operators x1;:::; xn. These generators satisfy the commutation relations xi xj = xj xi ; @i @j = @j @i ; @i xj − xj @i = δij : The Weyl algebra n Let D(n) be the Weyl algebra of differential operators on C with polynomial coefficients. The algebra D(n) is generated by the partial derivatives @1;:::;@n and by the multiplication operators x1;:::; xn. These generators satisfy the commutation relations xi xj = xj xi ; @i @j = @j @i ; @i xj − xj @i = δij : The nontrivial relations come from the Leibniz rule: @i (xj P) = @i (xj )P + xj @i (P): The algebra D(1) is generated by x and @, with relation [@; x] = 1. A crucial remark is that D(1) cannot have any finite-dimensional modules. Namely, if M were a finite-dimensional D(1)-module, then the operator [@; x] on M would have trace 0, while the operator 1 would have trace dim M, a contradiction. Examples: D(1) A crucial remark is that D(1) cannot have any finite-dimensional modules. Namely, if M were a finite-dimensional D(1)-module, then the operator [@; x] on M would have trace 0, while the operator 1 would have trace dim M, a contradiction. Examples: D(1) The algebra D(1) is generated by x and @, with relation [@; x] = 1. Namely, if M were a finite-dimensional D(1)-module, then the operator [@; x] on M would have trace 0, while the operator 1 would have trace dim M, a contradiction. Examples: D(1) The algebra D(1) is generated by x and @, with relation [@; x] = 1. A crucial remark is that D(1) cannot have any finite-dimensional modules. Examples: D(1) The algebra D(1) is generated by x and @, with relation [@; x] = 1. A crucial remark is that D(1) cannot have any finite-dimensional modules. Namely, if M were a finite-dimensional D(1)-module, then the operator [@; x] on M would have trace 0, while the operator 1 would have trace dim M, a contradiction. An obvious example of a D(1)-module is the space of polynomials C[x], where elements of D(1) act by definition. This module is \smaller" and more interesting than D(1) with left multiplication. Another \small" example: truncated Laurent polynomials −1 C[x; x ]=C[x]. (These can be moved to any c 2 C.) Another way to describe an isomorphic module is as C[@], with @ · @i = @i+1; x · @i = −i@i−1: (\Fourier transform" of C[x].) Examples: D(1)-modules This module is \smaller" and more interesting than D(1) with left multiplication. Another \small" example: truncated Laurent polynomials −1 C[x; x ]=C[x]. (These can be moved to any c 2 C.) Another way to describe an isomorphic module is as C[@], with @ · @i = @i+1; x · @i = −i@i−1: (\Fourier transform" of C[x].) Examples: D(1)-modules An obvious example of a D(1)-module is the space of polynomials C[x], where elements of D(1) act by definition. Another \small" example: truncated Laurent polynomials −1 C[x; x ]=C[x]. (These can be moved to any c 2 C.) Another way to describe an isomorphic module is as C[@], with @ · @i = @i+1; x · @i = −i@i−1: (\Fourier transform" of C[x].) Examples: D(1)-modules An obvious example of a D(1)-module is the space of polynomials C[x], where elements of D(1) act by definition. This module is \smaller" and more interesting than D(1) with left multiplication. Another way to describe an isomorphic module is as C[@], with @ · @i = @i+1; x · @i = −i@i−1: (\Fourier transform" of C[x].) Examples: D(1)-modules An obvious example of a D(1)-module is the space of polynomials C[x], where elements of D(1) act by definition. This module is \smaller" and more interesting than D(1) with left multiplication. Another \small" example: truncated Laurent polynomials −1 C[x; x ]=C[x]. (These can be moved to any c 2 C.) Examples: D(1)-modules An obvious example of a D(1)-module is the space of polynomials C[x], where elements of D(1) act by definition. This module is \smaller" and more interesting than D(1) with left multiplication. Another \small" example: truncated Laurent polynomials −1 C[x; x ]=C[x]. (These can be moved to any c 2 C.) Another way to describe an isomorphic module is as C[@], with @ · @i = @i+1; x · @i = −i@i−1: (\Fourier transform" of C[x].) Since D(2) = D(1) ⊗ D(1), one can consider modules of the form M1 ⊗ M2, where Mi are D(1)-modules.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    408 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us