DOCSLIB.ORG

Directors Report on the Operations Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PGNiG GROUP DIRECTORS' REPORT FOR 2020 (in PLN million, unless stated otherwise) Page 2 of 122 Free translation of the official Polish version in XHTML PGNiG GROUP DIRECTORS' REPORT FOR 2020 (in PLN million, unless stated otherwise) Financial highlights of the PGNiG Group Table 1 Financial highlights of the PGNiG Group for 2019–2020 PLNm EURm 2020 2019 2020 2019 Change (%) Change y/y Revenue 39,197 42,023 8,761 9,769 (7%) (2,826) Total operating expenses (29,612) (39,575) (6,619) (9,200) (25%) 9,963 Operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation 13,009 5,504 2,908 1,279 136% 7,505 and amortisation (EBITDA) Depreciation and amortisation expense (3,424) (3,056) (765) (710) 12% (368) Operating profit 9,585 2,448 2,142 569 292% 7,137 Profit before tax 9,025 2,159 2,017 502 318% 6,866 Net profit 7,340 1,371 1,641 319 435% 5,969 Net cash from operating activities 14,118 4,938 3,155 1,148 186% 9,180 Net cash from investing activities (6,254) (6,152) (1,398) (1,430) 2% (102) Net cash from financing activities (3,653) 327 (817) 76 (1,217%) (3,980) Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash 4,211 (887) 941 (206) (575%) 5,098 equivalents December December December December Change (%) Change y/y 31st 2020 31st 2019 31st 2020 31st 2019 Total assets 62,871 59,185 13,624 13,898 6% 3,686 Non-current assets 46,243 43,939 10,021 10,318 5% 2,304 Current assets, including 16,628 15,246 3,603 3,580 9% 1,382 Inventories 2,684 4,042 582 949 (34%) (1,358) Total equity and liabilities 62,871 59,185 13,624 13,898 6% 3,687 Total equity 44,125 38,107 9,562 8,948 16% 6,018 Total non-current liabilities 11,666 10,378 2,528 2,437 12% 1,288 Total current liabilities 7,080 10,700 1,534 2,513 (34%) (3,620) Total liabilities 18,746 21,078 4,062 4,950 (11%) (2,332) Selected financial data of PGNiG Table 2 Financial highlights of PGNiG for 2019–2020 PLNm EURm 2020 2019 2020 2019 Change (%) Change y/y Revenue 21,237 22,615 4,747 5,257 (6%) (1,378) Total operating expenses, including (13,342) (22,229) (2,982) (4,795) (35%) 7,284 Operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation 8,714 1,241 1,948 288 602% 7,473 and amortisation (EBITDA) Depreciation and amortisation expense (819) (856) (183) (199) (4%) 37 Operating profit 7,895 386 1,765 90 1,935% 7,507 Profit before tax 8,490 1,989 1,898 462 327% 6,501 Net profit 6,909 1,748 1,544 406 295% 5,161 Net cash from operating activities 9,394 1,989 2,100 462 372% 7,405 Net cash from investing activities (2,794) (2,256) (624) (524) 24% (538) Net cash from financing activities (3,591) (52) (803) (12) 6,806% (3,539) Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash 3,009 (319) 672 (74) (1,043%) 3,328 equivalents December December December December Change (%) Change y/y 31st 2020 31st 2019 31st 2020 31st 2019 Total assets 43,746 41,044 9,480 9,638 7% 2,702 Non-current assets 30,737 28,885 6,661 6,783 6% 1,852 Current assets, including 13,009 12,159 2,819 2,855 7% 850 Inventories 2,070 3,230 449 758 (36%) (1,160) Total equity and liabilities 43,746 41,044 9,480 9,638 7% 2,702 Total equity 36,230 30,618 7,851 7,190 18% 5,612 Total non-current liabilities 3,871 3,315 839 778 17% 557 Total current liabilities 3,645 7,111 790 1,670 (49%) (3,466) Total liabilities 7,516 10,426 1,629 2,448 (28%) (2,909) EUR/PLN mid exchange rates quoted by the National Bank of Poland: Average exchange rate in 2020: 4.4742; 2019: 4.3018; Exchange rate at year-end 2020: 4.6148; 2019: 4.2585. Page 3 of 122 Free translation of the official Polish version in XHTML PGNiG GROUP DIRECTORS' REPORT FOR 2020 (in PLN million, unless stated otherwise) Page 4 of 122 Free translation of the official Polish version in XHTML PGNiG GROUP DIRECTORS' REPORT FOR 2020 (in PLN million, unless stated otherwise) Table of contents Financial highlights of the PGNiG Group ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Selected financial data of PGNiG ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Business model and organisation of the PGNiG Group ................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 PGNiG Group's business and business model ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Organisation of the PGNiG Group ............................................................................................................................................ 8 1.3 Shareholding structure and PGNiG on the WSE ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.3.1 Shareholding structure .................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.3.2 Price performance of the PGNiG shares ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.3.3 Stock exchange indicators ........................................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.4 PGNiG Investor Relations............................................................................................................................................ 10 1.3.5 Dividend policy ............................................................................................................................................................ 11 2. Strategy of the PGNiG Group ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Mission and vision .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 2.2 Key challenges ....................................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 PGNiG Group Strategy for 2017−2022 with an Outlook until 2026 ........................................................................................ 13 2.3.1 Objectives and ambitions for 2017−2022 Implementation of the Strategy in 2017–2020 ............................................ 13 2.3.2 Investment projects in 2017−2022 ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.3.3 Capital expenditure in 2021 ......................................................................................................................................... 17 3. Business environment ................................................................................................................................................................. 20 3.1 Market overview ..................................................................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.1 Gas market in Europe and globally .............................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.2 Gas market in Poland .................................................................................................................................................. 21 3.2 Regulatory environment ......................................................................................................................................................... 23 3.2.1 Regulatory environment in Poland ............................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.2 European regulatory environment ............................................................................................................................... 24 4. Operating activities in 2020.......................................................................................................................................................... 28 4.1 Exploration and Production .................................................................................................................................................... 28 4.1.1 Key operating metrics .................................................................................................................................................. 29 4.1.2 Operations in Poland ................................................................................................................................................... 29 4.1.3 Foreign operations ....................................................................................................................................................... 33 4.1.4 Activities supporting the segment in Poland and abroad ............................................................................................. 38 4.1.5 Development prospects and challenges for the future ................................................................................................. 39 4.2 Trade and Storage ................................................................................................................................................................. 41 4.2.1 Key operating metrics .................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • TGE and Pgnig Embark on Cooperation with a View to Developing a Biomethane Market in Poland

    TGE and Pgnig Embark on Cooperation with a View to Developing a Biomethane Market in Poland

    Warsaw, 12 January 2021 TGE and PGNiG embark on cooperation with a view to developing a biomethane market in Poland Press Release On 12 January Towarowa Giełda Energii (TGE) and Polish Oil and Gas Company (PGNiG) signed a cooperation agreement aimed at leveraging their mutual expertise and capabilities in creating a biomethane market in Poland. TGE and PGNiG intend to jointly prepare modern solutions supporting the creation and development of a biomethane market in Poland. The expertise of both PGNiG, as a key player on the gas market, and of TGE as a trading platform where the trading in gas and certificates promoting the use of RES are concentrated, should contribute to the transformation of the energy market leading not only to increased significance of green technologies but also the emerging market for alternative fuels, such as biomethane or hydrogen. ‘For over 20 years, TGE has been supporting all transformation processes on the energy market and actively contributing to its development by offering its participants comprehensive solutions and products. The cooperation with PGNiG in creating a biomethane market is an opportunity for the Exchange to further develop the RES segment. Certainly, our registers have a key role to play in this project’ said Piotr Zawistowski, President of the Management Board of TGE. ‘PGNiG has been an active member of the gas exchange market since its inception and continues to contribute to its development, as evidenced, among other things, by the record-high volume of natural gas trading on TGE in 2020. Now we are about to a new chapter of cooperation, which will allow us to create modern market solutions in the field of biomethane trading.
  • Management Board's Report on Operations Of

    Management Board's Report on Operations Of

    Asseco Group Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2019 Present in Sales revenues 56 countries 10 667 mPLN 26 843 Net profit attributable highly commited to the parent employees company's shareholders 322.4 mPLN Order backlog for 2020 5.3 bPLN 7 601 mPLN market capitalization 1) 1) As at December 30, 2019 Asseco Group in 2019 non-IFRS measures (unaudited data) Non-IFRS figures presented below have not been audited or reviewed by an independent auditor. Non-IFRS figures are not financial data in accordance with EU IFRS. Non-IFRS data are not uniformly defined or calculated by other entities, and consequently they may not be comparable to data presented by other entities, including those operating in the same sector as the Asseco Group. Such financial information should be analyzed only as additional information and not as a replacement for financial information prepared in accordance with EU IFRS. Non-IFRS data should not be assigned a higher level of significance than measures directly resulting from the Consolidated Financial Statements. Financial and operational summary: • Dynamic organic growth and through acquisitions – increase in revenues by 14.4% to 10 667.4 mPLN and in operating profit by 22.5% to 976.2 mPLN (1 204.4 mPLN EBIT non-IFRS – increase by 14.9%) • International markets are the Group’s growth engine – 89% of revenues generated on these markets • Double-digit increase in sales in the Formula Systems and Asseco International segments • 81% of revenues from the sales of proprietary software and services • Strong business diversification (geographical, sectoral, product) Selected consolidated financial data for 2019 on a non-IFRS basis For the assessment of the financial position and business development of the Asseco Group, the basic data published on a non-IFRS basis constitute an important piece of information.
  • Inflated Hopes Or a Promising Alternative? Evaluating Impact of LNG on Polish Energy Security

    Inflated Hopes Or a Promising Alternative? Evaluating Impact of LNG on Polish Energy Security

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Wharton Research Scholars Wharton Undergraduate Research 5-2019 Inflated Hopes or a Promising Alternative? Evaluating Impact of LNG on Polish Energy Security Przemyslaw Stefan Macholak University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/wharton_research_scholars Part of the Business Commons Macholak, Przemyslaw Stefan, "Inflated Hopes or a Promising Alternative? Evaluating Impact of LNG on Polish Energy Security" (2019). Wharton Research Scholars. 179. https://repository.upenn.edu/wharton_research_scholars/179 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/wharton_research_scholars/179 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Inflated Hopes or a Promising Alternative? Evaluating Impact of LNG on Polish Energy Security Keywords energy security, LNG Disciplines Business This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/ wharton_research_scholars/179 INFLATED HOPES OR A PROMISING ALTERNATIVE? EVALUATING IMPACT OF LNG ON POLISH ENERGY SECURITY. By Przemyslaw Stefan Macholak An Undergraduate Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the WHARTON RESEARCH SCHOLARS Faculty Advisor: Anna Mikulska Ph.D. Senior Fellow at Kleinman Center for Energy Policy THE HUNTSMAN PROGRAM IN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES AND BUSINESS THE WHARTON SCHOOL, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA MAY 2019 1. Introduction Over the last 10 years, global energy landscape has been significantly
  • Pgnig: Accumulate (Reiterated) PGN PW; PGN.WA | Gas & Oil, Polska

    Pgnig: Accumulate (Reiterated) PGN PW; PGN.WA | Gas & Oil, Polska

    Wednesday, July 27, 2016 | update PGNiG: accumulate (reiterated) PGN PW; PGN.WA | Gas & Oil, Polska High FCF Guarantees Sustained Dividends Current Price PLN 5.50 Target Price PLN 6.06 PGNiG has generated a total return of 13% since our last update in April, outperforming the WIG20 index by 19 points, and at the Market Cap PLN 32.45bn current level the first-quarter positive earnings surprise is fully Free Float PLN 9.47bn priced in. That said, we still see upside potential in the Company ADTV (3M) PLN 65.18m even despite a disappointing preliminary second-quarter report, and we maintain an accumulate rating for PGN with the price target Ownership raised to PLN 6.06 per share. We have upgraded our FY2017 outlook for the Power Generation business and the E&P business which will State Treasury 70.83% more than offset the slowdown in Trade and in Distribution. According to our calculations, PGNiG will end 2016 with a net debt Others 29.17% close to zero even after this year's acquisitions, and with the 2017- 2018 FCF projected at PLN 1.9bn this leaves a thick cash cushion to Business Profile sustain dividends. PGNiG is still at risk of becoming involved in PGNiG is Poland’s largest natural gas company with furthering the government's energy policy, but at this time there are annual sales exceeding 14 billion cubic meters. The no specific plans on the table (the potential acquisitions of EDF Company produces 4.5bcm of gas and 1.2mmt of Poland assets or Petrobaltic should not significantly hurt crude oil per year (including from international deposits, most notably the Skarv project in shareholder value, and the Norway pipeline plans are a remote Norway).
  • DIRECTORS' REPORT on the OPERATIONS Pgnig S.A. in 2015

    DIRECTORS' REPORT on the OPERATIONS Pgnig S.A. in 2015

    DIRECTORS’ REPORT ON THE OPERATIONS PGNiG S.A. IN 2015 Warsaw, February 19th 2016 Directors’ Report on the Operations of PGNiG S.A. in 2015 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................. 2 Section I: Company’s highlights ........................................................................... 4 1. Business scope ................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Organisational structure of PGNiG S.A. ......................................................................................... 4 3. Ownership interests in other related entities ................................................................................... 6 4. Workforce ....................................................................................................................................... 9 5. Sales and production ....................................................................................................................... 9 Section II: Company’s Governing Bodies .......................................................... 11 1. Management Board ....................................................................................................................... 11 2. Supervisory Board ......................................................................................................................... 13 Section III: Shareholding structure ....................................................................
  • Annual Report Pgnig 2013

    Annual Report Pgnig 2013

    Annual Report PGNiG 2013 Annual Report PGNiG 2013 The following abbreviations and acronyms are used in this Report: • PGNiG – the parent company of the PGNiG Group, i.e. Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo SA (Polish Oil and Gas Company) • PGNiG Group – the PGNiG group of companies Contents 6 14 20 Mission Letter from the President Supervisory Board of the Management Board 8 15 24 PGNiG in Numbers Management Board PGNiG on the Stock Market 10 18 28 Key Events Letter from the Chairman Strategy for the of the Supervisory Board PGNiG Group 4 PGNiG 34 58 70 90 Exploration and Heat and electricity Employees Consolidated Financial Production generation Statements for the Year 2013 44 63 76 108 Trade and Storage Corporate Governance Environmental Protection Contact 54 66 82 Distribution Risks The PGNiG Group Annual Report 2013 5 Mission statement 6 PGNiG Our mission is to provide secure and reliable supplies of clean and environmentally friendly energy using competitive and innovative solutions. We are true and faithful to our traditions and to the trust our customers place in us, but also remain open to new challenges and changes. Acting in the best interests of our shareholders, customers and employees, we strive to be a reliable and trustworthy partner, pursuing business growth and value creation in accordance with the principles of sustainable development. Annual Report 2013 7 Letter from the President of the Letter from the Management Management Chairman of the Supervisory PGNiG on the Stock Strategy for the Exploration and Mission PGNiG in Numbers Key Events Board Board Supervisory Board Board Exchange PGNiG Group Production PGNiG in Numbers The PGNiG Group is the leader in the Polish natural gas market.
  • Pgnig, PKN Orlen, Altus TFI, Atlanta

    Pgnig, PKN Orlen, Altus TFI, Atlanta

    Dziennik 07 grudnia 2018 r. Najważniejsze informacje: Indeksy GPW zmiana WIG otw. 59 113,7 0,6% Indeksy - Trakcja wejdzie do indeksu mWIG40, opuści go Netia WIG zam. 58 409,1 -2,2% PGNiG - PGNiG rozpoczyna poszukiwania węglowodorów w Zjednoczonych Emiratach obrót (mln PLN) 832,5 0,6% Arabskich WIG 20 otw. 2 335,3 0,7% PKN Orlen - PKN Orlen podpisał porozumienie ze związkami dot. zmiany ZUZP i podwyżki WIG 20 zam. 2 294,3 -2,6% wynagrodzeń w '19 FW20 otw. 2 330,0 high Sektor bankowy - Zysk netto sektora bankowego w I-X '18 wyniósł 12,7 mld PLN, w X 1,06 mld FW20 zam. 2 301,0 -2,5% PLN - NBP mWIG40 otw. 4 039,7 0,6% mWIG40 zam. 3 997,3 -1,4% Sektor energetyczny - Minister energii wystąpi do szefów RN spółek energetycznych o zbadanie poziomu kosztów Największe wzrosty kurs zmiana Sektor energetyczny - ME zakłada, że wolumen na aukcjach OZE w '19 wyniesie nie mniej niż Budimex 125,80 4,8% 2,5 tys. MW - Tchórzewski AmRest 40,10 1,8% Altus TFI - KNF wszczęła postępowanie administracyjne ws. nałożenia kary na Altus TFI BGŻ BNP Paribas 46,50 1,3% Atlanta - Atlanta Poland i Rockfield ogłosili wezwanie na 2.468.957 akcji spółki, po 4,2 PLN za Neuca 260,00 0,8% akcję AB 17,20 0,6% Biomed-Lublin - Lek ONKO BCG Biomedu-Lublin nie spełnił warunków jakościowych Największe spadki kurs zmiana Biomed-Lublin - Biomed-Lublin zdecydował o emisji obligacji zamiennych na akcje KAZ Minerals 5,32 -6,0% ERG - ERG zakończył przegląd opcji strategicznych; nie wybrał żadnej z rozważanych opcji Raiffeisen 23,79 -5,6% ERG - Robert Groborz zrezygnował z funkcji prezesa
  • Report of Bank Pekao S.A. Group for the First Quarter of 2021 Report on the Activities of Bank Pekao S.A

    Report of Bank Pekao S.A. Group for the First Quarter of 2021 Report on the Activities of Bank Pekao S.A

    Report of Bank Pekao S.A. Group for the first quarter of 2021 Warsaw, May 2021 This document is a free translation of the Polish original. Terminology current in Anglo-Saxon countries has been used where practicable for the purposes of this translation in order to aid understanding. The binding Polish original should be referred to in matters of interpretation. Report on the activities of Bank Pekao S.A. Group for the first quarter of 2021 This document is a free translation of the Polish original. Terminology current in Anglo-Saxon countries has been used where practicable for the purposes of this translation in order to aid understanding. The binding Polish original should be referred to in matters of interpretation. Warsaw, May 2021 Report on the activities of Bank Pekao S.A. Group for the first quarter of 2021 1. Highlights of Bank Pekao S.A. Group .............................................................................................................................................................................3 2. Highlights of Bank Pekao S.A. .........................................................................................................................................................................................4 3. Summary of Performance .................................................................................................................................................................................................5 4. External Activity Conditions .............................................................................................................................................................................................7
  • Permit for the Baltic Pipe Natural Gas Pipeline in the Lit- Tle Belt and Baltic Pipe (Europipe II Branch Pipeline) in the North Sea

    Permit for the Baltic Pipe Natural Gas Pipeline in the Lit- Tle Belt and Baltic Pipe (Europipe II Branch Pipeline) in the North Sea

    This translation is provided for convenience only, and in the event of any conflict be- tween the wording of the Danish and English versions, the wording of the Danish version shall prevail in all respects. UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION Energinet Office GAS TSO Tonne Kjærsvej 65 7000 Fredericia Date Denmark Ref. no. xx Attn. Aaron Petersen DiBona / [initials] This is a translation from Danish. This translation is provided for convenience only, and in the event of any conflict between the wording of the Danish and English versions, the word- ing of the Danish version shall prevail in all respects. Permit for the Baltic Pipe natural gas pipeline in the Lit- tle Belt and Baltic Pipe (Europipe II Branch Pipeline) in the North Sea Energinet Gas TSO A/S (hereinafter ‘Energinet’) and Gaz-System S.A. plan to construct Baltic Pipe (Europipe II Branch Pipeline) in the North Sea and the Baltic Pipe pipeline in the Little Belt for the transport of natural gas from Europipe II in the North Sea to Poland via Denmark from Norway. Energinet will be the owner of the section of the pipeline proposed to be constructed in the North Sea and the Little Belt and most of the onshore section of the pipeline. Gaz-System will be the owner of 400 metres of onshore pipeline by Faxe Bugt and the pipeline in the Baltic Sea. The Danish Environmental Protection Agency is the responsible environmental authority for the on- shore section of the pipeline, while the Danish Energy Agency is the re- sponsible authority for the offshore section.
  • WOOD's Winter in Prague

    WOOD's Winter in Prague

    emerging europe conference WOOD’s Winter in Prague Tuesday 5 December to Friday 8 December 2017 Please join us for our flagship event - now in its6th year - spanning 4 jam-packed days. We expect to host over 180 companies representing more than 15 countries. NEW: attending company (not covered) snapshotsattached! Click here ! For more information please contact your WOOD sales representative: Tuesday: Energy, Industrials and Materials Registration closes Warsaw +48 222 22 1530 Wednesday: TMT and Utilities on 10 November! Prague +420 222 096 453 Thursday: Consumer, Healthcare and Real Estate London +44 20 3530 7685 Friday: Diversified and Financials [email protected] Invited Companies by country Bolded confirmed Austria MOL Group PGNiG Sistema Ukraine AT & S OTP Bank PKN Orlen Tinkoff Bank Astarta Atrium Waberer’s International PKO BP TMK Industrial Milk Erste Group Bank Wizz Air PKP Cargo TransContainer Company Immofinanz PZU VTB Ferrexpo PORR Iraq Tauron X5 Kernel Raiffeisen International Genel Energy Warsaw Stock MHP Strabag Exchange Serbia Telekom Austria Kazakhstan Wirtualna Polska Belgrade Stock United Kingdom Uniqa Insurance Group Nostrum Oil & Gas Work Service Exchange Kaz Minerals Vienna Insurance Steppe Cement NIS Stock Spirits Group Romania Croatia Lithuania Banca Transilvania Slovenia Podravka Siauliu Bankas Bucharest Stock Gorenje Exchange Krka Conpet Czech Republic Poland Petrol SPEAKERS DIGI CEZ Agora Sava Re Ms. Charlotte Ruhe Electrica MD for Central Europe CME Alior Bank Zavarovalnica Triglav Fondul Proprietatea & the Baltics, EBRD CSOB AmRest Medlife Mr. Leszek Balcerowicz Kofola Asseco Poland Sweden Professor, Warsaw Nuclearelectrica Medicover Komercni Banka Bank Millennium School of Economics OMV Petrom Moneta Money Bank Bank Pekao Vostok Emerging and Chairman of FOR Sphera Finance O2 Czech Republic Budimex Mr.
  • Equinor and Ørsted: How Industrial Policy Shaped the Scandinavian Energy Giants

    Equinor and Ørsted: How Industrial Policy Shaped the Scandinavian Energy Giants

    INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION AND PUBLIC PURPOSE IIPP POLICY BRIEF 14 MARCH 2021 EQUINOR AND ØRSTED: HOW INDUSTRIAL POLICY SHAPED THE SCANDINAVIAN ENERGY GIANTS Jonas Algers Economist Manifest Tankesmie Rainer Kattel Deputy Director UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Source: Unsplash | Jason Blackeye Introduction The green transition requires radical shifts in both public respective countries’ petroleum extraction policy. Over policies and corporate actors. In the case of state-owned time, two trends have developed. First, direct state control enterprises (SOEs), these two worlds meet. The two has been reduced in both firms, following the international partially state-owned Scandinavian enterprises Equinor trend towards privatisation. Since the turn of the millennium (Norway) and Ørsted (Denmark) (formerly Statoil and the state ownership share has been reduced in both firms DONG, respectively) have both recently adopted new and the Norwegian state now owns 67 percent of Equinor, strategies for renewable energy development. However, while the Danish state owns 50.4 percent of Ørsted. At the green strategies of the two firms differ quite radically, the initial public offering in 2001, Statoil was valued at both in scale and timeline. This divergence can partially NOK 151 billion (Wall Street Journal, 2001). DONG Energy be explained by a difference in their respective access to was only publicly listed in 2016 and was then valued at fossil assets. However, the two SOEs have also been tools DKK 98.2 billion (NOK 123 billion) (Bray, 2016). Second, for policy goals, having been founded as vehicles for their as climate change has become an increasingly acute This brief can be referenced as follows: Algers, J.
  • Small States' Security Strategies Need an International Energy

    Small States' Security Strategies Need an International Energy

    DIIS POLICY BRIEF MAY 2021 SMALL STATES’ SECURITY STRATEGIES NEED AN INTERNATIONAL ENERGY DIMENSION What can be learned from the Danish Nord Stream and Baltic Pipe negotiations? Denmark encountered a number of unforeseen obstacles when negotiating the Nord Stream RECOMMENDATIONS and Baltic Pipe gas pipelines, and the country ■ Small states should include energy in strategic ended up standing exposed and alone. A better documents pertaining to foreign and security politics of energy alliances and better strategic policies, as energy is a tool in the security toolbox preparation are key lessons for small states like of the great powers. Denmark when dealing with the problematic combination of security and energy. ■ Self-sufficiency in energy does not mean that a country is shielded from the dynamics of international energy. Denmark has been self-sufficient in its energy supplies since the mid-1990s, and energy has been dealt ■ Small states should strive to build enduring political with largely as a technical issue pertaining to the alliances focused on energy. accessibility, affordability and accountability of energy ■ Small states should prioritise sending experts to the sources. This position fed into an understanding of NATO Centre of Excellence for Energy Security in energy crises as something that largely happened order to stay on top of the international security elsewhere. So, when Denmark got caught up in situation concerning energy. international energy geopolitics concerning the two Nord Stream pipelines that are intended to bring natural gas from Russia to northern Germany, and accession of new eastern European member states to when the Baltic Pipe planned to start pumping the EU, the Danish-Russian diplomatic relationship Norwegian gas to Poland, the country had to make up deteriorated.