DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of Crop Wild Relative Conservation Strategies for Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development of Crop Wild Relative Conservation Strategies for Norway DEVELOPMENT OF CROP WILD RELATIVE CONSERVATION STRATEGIES FOR NORWAY by Jade Phillips A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biosciences College of Life and Environmental Sciences The University of Birmingham April 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract Climate change and anthropogenic activities threaten our global food security. One area of research that may help combat a future food crisis is the utilization of the genetic diversity available in wild plants. Crop wild relatives (CWR) are one such resource. They are the wild taxa most closely related to crops and from which diverse traits could be transferred to the crop. This project uses Norway as an example, to contribute towards methodologies to identify those CWR populations that are most important for conservation and use. This involves the creation of a priority list of CWR for Norway, in situ and ex situ diversity analysis of CWR populations, gap analysis and ecogeographic land characterization methodologies, predictive climate change analysis for CWR distributions and genetic diversity studies of taxa using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs). Comprehensive in situ and ex situ national recommendations for the conservation of CWR in Norway are detailed. These include the incorporation of management plans for CWR populations within the Færder national park in Norway, the first instance of such conservation activities in Scandinavia. The scientific methods used and developed will help Norway meet its international obligations for conservation and use of genetic diversity of CWR and will contribute to the regional and global efforts to systematically conserve and utilize the diversity found in CWR. For Grandad, enjoy your long walk amongst the flowers. Acknowledgements I am indebted to both Åsmund Asdal and Dr. Nigel Maxted who believed in me from the outset and without whom this PhD would not have been possible, thank you. Dr Joana Magos Brehm has always provided invaluable knowledge and advice throughout this project. Shelagh Kell and Professor Ford Lloyd for sharing their in-depth expertise with me. Morten Rasmussen for the ongoing support of myself and this project and for the persistent push for the continued conservation and use of CWR within Norway. Thank you to the many Norwegian and Scandinavian colleagues who I had the pleasure to work with across Norway over the last three and a half years, including: Karen Jordal, Dag Endresen, Oddvar Peterson, Tore Berg, Bob van Oort, Vegar Bakkestuen, Heli Fitzgerald, Anna Palmè, I look forward to many more years of collaboration. I am grateful to Kirsten Skøt and Matthew Hegarty from IBERS for providing this project with their expertise and Caroline Pollock and Jamie Carr from the IUCN for their helpful advice. I would like to thank Mauricio Parra-Quijano for his continued guidance and willingness to answer my many questions about CAPFITOGEN. Thank you to Hannah Fielder and Holly Vincent for passing on their PhD wisdom as well as Maria João Almeida and Aremi Contreras Toledo for keeping me smiling in the office. I am especially grateful to the Norwegian Ministry of Agriculture and Food for funding this project. Finally, I would like to thank my family and friends for always believing in me, more than I ever could myself. Thank you. Table of contents CHAPTER 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 What is a crop wild relative? ............................................................................................ 3 1.2 Aim of in situ and ex situ CWR conservation .................................................................. 7 1.3 International legislation for PGR conservation .............................................................. 13 1.4 Threats to CWR .............................................................................................................. 15 1.5 Floristic background to Norway ..................................................................................... 19 1.5.1 Threats to CWR in Norway ..................................................................................... 21 1.5.2 Current in situ and ex situ conservation actions in Norway .................................... 23 1.6 Background to methods .................................................................................................. 26 1.6.1 Checklist and inventory ........................................................................................... 26 1.6.2 Ecogeographic study ................................................................................................ 27 1.6.3 Predicted distribution ............................................................................................... 29 1.6.4 Climate change analysis .......................................................................................... 31 1.6.5 CAPFITOGEN tools................................................................................................ 33 1.6.6 Genetic diversity analyses ....................................................................................... 34 1.7 Aim and objectives ......................................................................................................... 36 1.8 Overview of thesis .......................................................................................................... 37 CHAPTER 2. Methodology................................................................................................... 41 2.1 National CWR checklist ................................................................................................. 41 2.2 Prioritization and Inventory ........................................................................................... 42 2.3 Ecogeographic study ...................................................................................................... 43 2.4 Diversity analyses .......................................................................................................... 44 2.4.2 Species richness and occurrence data bias .............................................................. 47 2.4.3 Predicted distribution and gap analysis ................................................................... 47 2.4.3.1 In situ gap analysis ............................................................................................... 49 2.4.3.2 Ex situ gap analysis............................................................................................... 49 2.4.4 Complementarity analysis ....................................................................................... 50 2.4.5 Climate change assessment ..................................................................................... 51 2.4.5.1 Climate change diversity analyses ........................................................................ 52 2.5 Genetic diversity studies ................................................................................................ 53 2.5.1 Molecular marker genotyping ................................................................................. 57 2.5.2 Analysis of the AFLP electropherograms ............................................................... 58 2.5.3 Statistical analysis.................................................................................................... 59 CHAPTER 3. In situ and ex situ diversity analysis of priority crop wild relatives in Norway .................................................................................................................................... 61 3.1 Abstract .......................................................................................................................... 62 3.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 63 3.3 Methods .......................................................................................................................... 66 3.3.1 National CWR checklist and inventory ................................................................... 66 3.3.2 In situ diversity analyses.......................................................................................... 67 3.3.3 Potential distribution modelling .............................................................................. 68 3.3.4 Ecogeographic Land Characterization maps ........................................................... 69 3.3.5 Ex situ diversity analyses ......................................................................................... 70 3.4 Results ............................................................................................................................ 71 3.4.1 CWR checklist, inventory and ecogeographic study ............................................... 71 3.4.2 In situ diversity analysis .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Watsonia 27 (2008), 171-187
    Watsonia 27: 171–187 (2008) PLANT RECORDS 171 Plant Records Records for publication must be submitted to the appropriate Vice-county Recorder (see BSBI Year Book 2008), and not to the Editors. Following publication of the New Atlas of the British & Irish Flora and the Vice-county Census Catalogue, new criteria have been drawn up for the inclusion of records in Plant Records. (See BSBI News no. 95, January 2004 pp. 10 & 11). These are outlined below: First records of all taxa (species, subspecies and hybrids) included in the VCCC, designated as native, archaeophyte, neophyte or casual. First record since 1970 of the taxa above, except in the case of Rubus, Hieracium and Taraxacum. Records demonstrating the rediscovery of all taxa published as extinct in the VCCC or subsequently. Newly reported definite extinctions. Deletions from the VCCC (e.g. through the discovery of errors, the redetermination of specimens etc.) NB – only those errors affecting VCCC entry. New 10km square records for Rare and Scarce plants, defined as those species in the New Atlas mapped in the British Isles in 100 10km squares or fewer. (See BSBI News no. 95, January 2004 pp. 36–43). Records for the subdivisions of vice-counties will not be treated separately; they must therefore be records for the vice-county as a whole. However, records will be accepted for the major islands in v.cc. 102–104, 110 and 113. In the following list, records are arranged in the order given in the List of Vascular Plants of the British Isles and its supplements by D.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
    Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volume 9, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991), Bridson (2004), and Bridson and D. W. Brown (http://fmhibd.library.cmu.edu/fmi/iwp/cgi?-db=BPH_Online&-loadframes). When those forms are abbreviated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and Stafleu et al. (1992–2009). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 and Appendices
    Contents Page Section 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Biodiversity action in Orkney – general outline of the Plan 6 1.2 Biodiversity Action Planning - the international and national contexts 6 • The Scottish Biodiversity Strategy 1.3 Recent developments in environmental legislation 8 • The Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 • The Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011 • The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 1.4 Biodiversity and the Local Authority Planning System 12 • The Orkney Local Development Plan 2012-2017 1.5 Community Planning 13 1.6 River Basin Management Planning 13 1.7 Biodiversity and rural development policy 14 • The Common Agricultural Policy • Scotland Rural Development Programme 2007-2013 1.8 Other relevant national publications 15 • Scotland’s Climate Change Adaptation Framework • Scotland’s Land Use Strategy • The Scottish Soil Framework 1.9 Links with the Orkney Biodiversity Records Centre 16 Section 2 Selection of the Ten Habitats for Inclusion in the Orkney Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 17 1 • Lowland fens 19 2 • Basin bog 27 3 • Eutrophic standing waters 33 4 • Mesotrophic lochs 41 5 • Ponds and milldams 47 6 • Burns and canalized burns 53 7 • Coastal sand dunes and links 60 8 • Aeolianite 70 9 • Coastal vegetated shingle 74 10 • Intertidal Underboulder Communities 80 Appendix I Species considered to be of conservation concern in Orkney Appendix II BAP habitats found in Orkney Appendix III The Aichi targets and goals 3 Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 Section 1 – Introduction What is biodiversity? a) Consider natural systems – by using The term ‘biodiversity’ means, quite simply, knowledge of interactions in nature and how the variety of species and genetic varieties ecosystems function.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora-Lab-Manual.Pdf
    LabLab MManualanual ttoo tthehe Jane Mygatt Juliana Medeiros Flora of New Mexico Lab Manual to the Flora of New Mexico Jane Mygatt Juliana Medeiros University of New Mexico Herbarium Museum of Southwestern Biology MSC03 2020 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA 87131-0001 October 2009 Contents page Introduction VI Acknowledgments VI Seed Plant Phylogeny 1 Timeline for the Evolution of Seed Plants 2 Non-fl owering Seed Plants 3 Order Gnetales Ephedraceae 4 Order (ungrouped) The Conifers Cupressaceae 5 Pinaceae 8 Field Trips 13 Sandia Crest 14 Las Huertas Canyon 20 Sevilleta 24 West Mesa 30 Rio Grande Bosque 34 Flowering Seed Plants- The Monocots 40 Order Alistmatales Lemnaceae 41 Order Asparagales Iridaceae 42 Orchidaceae 43 Order Commelinales Commelinaceae 45 Order Liliales Liliaceae 46 Order Poales Cyperaceae 47 Juncaceae 49 Poaceae 50 Typhaceae 53 Flowering Seed Plants- The Eudicots 54 Order (ungrouped) Nymphaeaceae 55 Order Proteales Platanaceae 56 Order Ranunculales Berberidaceae 57 Papaveraceae 58 Ranunculaceae 59 III page Core Eudicots 61 Saxifragales Crassulaceae 62 Saxifragaceae 63 Rosids Order Zygophyllales Zygophyllaceae 64 Rosid I Order Cucurbitales Cucurbitaceae 65 Order Fabales Fabaceae 66 Order Fagales Betulaceae 69 Fagaceae 70 Juglandaceae 71 Order Malpighiales Euphorbiaceae 72 Linaceae 73 Salicaceae 74 Violaceae 75 Order Rosales Elaeagnaceae 76 Rosaceae 77 Ulmaceae 81 Rosid II Order Brassicales Brassicaceae 82 Capparaceae 84 Order Geraniales Geraniaceae 85 Order Malvales Malvaceae 86 Order Myrtales Onagraceae
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora and Geoecology of Mont De La Table, Gaspésie, Québec
    RHODORA, Vol. 117, No. 969, pp. 1–40, 2015 E Copyright 2015 by the New England Botanical Club doi: 10.3119/14-07; first published on-line March 11, 2015. VASCULAR FLORA AND GEOECOLOGY OF MONT DE LA TABLE, GASPE´ SIE, QUE´ BEC SCOTT W. BAILEY USDA Forest Service, 234 Mirror Lake Road, North Woodstock, NH 03262 e-mail: [email protected] JOANN HOY 21 Steam Mill Road, Auburn, NH 03032 CHARLES V. COGBILL 82 Walker Lane, Plainfield, VT 05667 ABSTRACT. The influence of substrate lithology on the distribution of many vascular and nonvascular plants has long been recognized, especially in alpine, subalpine, and other rocky habitats. In particular, plants have been classified as dependent on high-calcium substrates (i.e., calcicoles) based on common restriction to habitats developed in calcareous rocks, such as limestone and marble. In a classic 1907 paper on the influence of substrate on plants, M. L. Fernald singled out a particular meadow on Mont de la Table in the Chic-Choc Mountains of Que´bec for its unusual co-occurrence of strict calcicole and calcifuge (i.e., acidophile) plant taxa. We re-located this site, investigated substrate factors responsible for its unusual plant diversity, and documented current plant distributions. No calcareous rocks were found on site. However, inclusions of calcareous rocks were found farther up the mountain. The highest pH and dissolved calcium concentrations in surface waters were found in a series of springs that deliver groundwater, presumably influenced by calcareous rocks up the slope. Within the habitat delineated by common occurrences of calcicole species, available soil calcium varied by a factor of five and soil pH varied by almost 1.5 units, depending on microtopography and relative connection with groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society Paul Banham Describes the Distribution of Seaweeds at Wells -Next-The Sea on the North Norfolk Coast
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS' SOCIETY Vol. 33 Part 1 (June 2000) -ji\ (ViuScUM i I 22 AUQ 2000 j j I BXCHAKISO i - QENfcRAL | TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY ISSN 0375 7226 Volume 33 Part 1 (June 2000) Editor P.W.Lambley Assist. Ed. Roy Baker OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY 2000-2001 President: T.N.D.Peet Vice-Presidents: Dr R Baker. P R Banham. Mrs M. A.Brewster, A L. Bull. K.B.Clarke.,E.T.Daniels. D.A.Dorling. K.C Durrant. RE Evans, RC Haney, R. Jones, Mrs J. Robinson. Chairman: K.B.Clarke, Decoy House, Browston, Great Yarmouth, NR31 9DP. Tel. 01502 730363 Secretary: Dr A.R.Leech. 3, Eccles Rd, Holt. NR25 6HJ Assistant Secretary: J.F.Butcher. 4. Hillvue Close. New Costessey, NR5 ONQ Treasurer: D.l. Richmond, 42. Richmond Rise, Reepham. NRIO 4LS Membership Committee: D.L.Paull (Chairman), 8, Lindford Drive, Eaton, Norwich NR4 6LT, Tel: 01603 457270; S.M.Livermore, (Secretaiy) 70 Naseby Way, Dussingdale, Norwich NR7 OTP. Tel 01603 431849 Programme Committee:R.W.Ellis (Chairman). Dr S.R.Martin (Secretary) Publications Committee: Dr R.Baker (Chairman). P.W.Lambley. Dr M.Perrow. G.E. Dunmore, (Editors) Research Committee: R. W. Maidstone (Chairman).Dr I.F.Keymer (Secretary) Hon. Auditor: Mrs S. Pearson Wildlife 2000 Committee: S.M. Livermore, Project Director Elected Members of Council: A.C. Brown, A.L.Howes, D.Nobbs, Mrs C.W. Haines, Mrs A. Harrap, D.B.MacFarlane, M.H.Poulton, J. Clifton, F.LJ.L.Farrow, W.G. Mitchell, P.Westley o 3 Q fc3 Q o c U s 8 O 2 3 «s >3 O a c/3 orchids § 5 a, 'P read T3 cfl 8 tM 3 O orchard 8 u o c3 s t for ^2 24:- o U-) 0> page cx <u »-• Opposite o cx Ocx Hw fV-5 vJ UM 22 A’: a 2CuO WILDLIFE 2000 exckai^gsid qOMCRAL During its 125th anniversary celebrations, the Vurl'Olk ' f^rwicir Naturalists' Society announced its intention to document the wildlife of Norfolk for the start of the new millennium in a project called Wildlife 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flora of Harding County: a Century of Botany in Northwestern South Dakota, Usa
    Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science, Vol. 93 (2014) 101 THE FLORA OF HARDING COUNTY: A CENTURY OF BOTANY IN NORTHWESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA, USA Mark Gabel1*, B. E. Nelson2, Daryl Mergen3, Kurt Hansen4 and Grace Kostel1 1Biology Department, Black Hills State University, Spearfish, SD 57799 2Rocky Mountain Herbarium, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 3Mergen Ecological Delineations, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO 80905 4USDA Forest Service, Sioux Ranger District, Camp Crook, SD 57724 *Corresponding author email: [email protected] ABSTRACT We report the current knowledge of the vascular plant flora of Harding County, South Dakota, which includes 724 species. Introduced species have increased from five percent of the flora to 13% over the last century. Relatively small changes have occurred in plant species duration, species habit or major groups over 100 years. Mean coefficients of conservatism varied from 4.3 to 6.2 in eight areas across the county, with the lowest values in riparian areas and highest values in pine-dominated buttes. Keywords floristics, grassland, Northern Great Plains, South Dakota, vegetation INTRODUCTION This report documents vascular plant species from Harding County, South Dakota, from historical and recent plant collections. Literature describing the flora of Harding County is lacking. The most notable publication is by Visher (1914) who completed a species list for the county. Visher’s publication was based upon collections made by him in 1910-1912, and collections made by Rowley in 1909, Fromme in 1910, and Over in 1911. Heidel and Dueholm (1995) reported on “sensitive” species in Custer National Forest in Carter County, Montana, and Harding County.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Biodiversity Science, Discovery, and Conservation: Case Studies from Australasia and the Pacific
    Plant Biodiversity Science, Discovery, and Conservation: Case Studies from Australasia and the Pacific Craig Costion School of Earth and Environmental Sciences Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Adelaide Adelaide, SA 5005 Thesis by publication submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology July 2011 ABSTRACT This thesis advances plant biodiversity knowledge in three separate bioregions, Micronesia, the Queensland Wet Tropics, and South Australia. A systematic treatment of the endemic flora of Micronesia is presented for the first time thus advancing alpha taxonomy for the Micronesia-Polynesia biodiversity hotspot region. The recognized species boundaries are used in combination with all known botanical collections as a basis for assessing the degree of threat for the endemic plants of the Palau archipelago located at the western most edge of Micronesia’s Caroline Islands. A preliminary assessment is conducted utilizing the IUCN red list Criteria followed by a new proposed alternative methodology that enables a degree of threat to be established utilizing existing data. Historical records and archaeological evidence are reviewed to establish the minimum extent of deforestation on the islands of Palau since the arrival of humans. This enabled a quantification of population declines of the majority of plants endemic to the archipelago. In the state of South Australia, the importance of establishing concepts of endemism is emphasized even further. A thorough scientific assessment is presented on the state’s proposed biological corridor reserve network. The report highlights the exclusion from the reserve system of one of the state’s most important hotspots of plant endemism that is highly threatened from habitat fragmentation and promotes the use of biodiversity indices to guide conservation priorities in setting up reserve networks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flora of the Cairngorms National Park
    The Flora of the Cairngorms National Park A Rare Plant Register Andy Amphlett May 2013 The Botanical Society of the British Isles The BSBI is for everyone who is interested in the flora of Britain and Ireland. It is the largest and most active organisation devoted to the study of botany in the British Isles. The BSBI produces national Atlases and county Floras of the distribution of plants, and guides to the identification of more difficult plant groups. It publishes a scientific journal, The New Journal of Botany, in which studies of British, Irish and NW European vascular plants are published. BSBI also organises field and indoor meetings as well as conferences on botany. Members are kept informed by a newsletter (BSBI News) three times a year and are invited to make use of our system of county recorders and national referees who can help with the identification of plants. An education programme supported by the society brings high quality botanical training within the reach of all, from school students to professional development and postgraduate courses. Scientific research on British botany is supported through grants awarded by the Science & Research Committee and through the work of the Plant Unit. The BSBI is a charity registered in England and Wales (212560) and in Scotland (SC038675). For more information go to www.bsbi.org.uk Frontispiece map shows the location of the Cairngorms National Park within the British Isles. 2 Introduction The Cairngorms National Park (CNP), established in 2003 and extended to its present boundary in 2010, is the largest national park in the UK at 4528km2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2018-2022 (LBAP) Is the Third in a Series of Focused Revisions of the Original Orkney LBAP (2002)
    Version 1.3: A targeted action plan for 2018 - 2022 Prepared by Orkney’s Biodiversity Steering Group for the Orkney Environment Partnership August 2018 This page is intentionally blank. 1 Orkney’s Community Biodiversity Project is supported by the following organisations: 2 Contents Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................................ 5 The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan – general outline .............................. 9 Biodiversity Action Planning – internationally and nationally ............................... 9 The Orkney Wildlife Information and Records Centre ....................................... 11 Section 2: Biodiversity themes .............................................................................. 12 Theme 1: Greenspace ...................................................................................... 12 Theme 2: Farmland ........................................................................................... 19 Theme 3: Peatland ............................................................................................ 26 Blanket Bog habitat description ......................................................................... 35 Basin Bog habitat description ............................................................................ 39 Upland Heathland habitat description ............................................................... 42 Theme 4: The Marine Environment ................................................................... 47
    [Show full text]