DOCSLIB.ORG

Literature Cited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Literature Cited Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volume 9, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991), Bridson (2004), and Bridson and D. W. Brown (http://fmhibd.library.cmu.edu/fmi/iwp/cgi?-db=BPH_Online&-loadframes). When those forms are abbreviated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and Stafleu et al. (1992–2009). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in this volume. Aas, G. et al. 1994. Morphology, isozyme variation, cytology, Abh. Westfäl. Mus. Naturk. = Abhandlungen der Westfälischen and reproduction of hybrids between Sorbus aria (L.) Museum für Naturkunde. Crantz and S. torminalis (L.) Crantz. Bot. Helv. 104: Abrams, L. 1944. Horkelia. In: L. Abrams and R. S. Ferris. 195–214. 1923–1960. Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States: Abh. Königl. Böhm. Ges. Wiss. = Abhandlungen der Königlichen Washington, Oregon, and California. 4 vols. Stanford. böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. Vol. 2, pp. 416–421. Abh. Naturwiss. Vereins Bremen = Abhandlungen Abrams, L. and R. S. Ferris. 1923–1960. Illustrated Flora of herausgegeben vom Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins zu the Pacific States: Washington, Oregon, and California. Bremen. 4 vols. Stanford. 663 664 LITERATURE CITED Academia Sinica. 1959+. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Anders, C. M. and Z. E. Murrell. 2001. Morphological, 80+ vols. Beijing. molecular, and biogeographical variation within the Ackerman, T. L., J. Bair, and A. Tiehm. 2003. A flora of the imperiled Virginia Spiraea. Castanea 66: 24–41. Desert National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada. Mentzelia 7: Anderson, G. J. 1980. The status of the very rare Prunus 1–90. gravesii Small. Rhodora 82: 113–129. Acta Bot. Brasil. = Acta Botanica Brasilica. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2003. An update of the Acta Bot. Neerl. = Acta Botanica Neerlandica. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the Acta Bot. Yunnan. = Acta Botanica Yunnanica. [Yunnan orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Zhiwu Yanjiu.] Linn. Soc. 141: 399–436. Acta Hort. = Acta Horticulturae; Technical Communications Ann. Bot. Fenn. = Annales Botanici Fennici. of I S H S (International Society for Horticultural Ann. Carnegie Mus. = Annals of the Carnegie Museum. Science). Ann. Gén. Hort. = Annales Générales d’Horticulture. Acta Phytotax. Sin. = Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. [Chih Ann. Lyceum Nat. Hist. New York = Annals of the Lyceum Wu Fen Lei Hsüeh Pao.] of Natural History of New York. Acta Soc. Bot. Poloniae = Acta Societatis Botanicorum Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. = Annals of the Missouri Botanical Poloniae. Garden. Acta Univ. Agric. Suec., Agrar. = Acta Universitatis Ann. Mus. Bot. Lugduno-Batavi = Annales Musei Botanici Agriculturae Suecicae. Agraria. Lugduno-Batavi. Adansonia = Adansonia; Recueil Périodique d’Observations Ann. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. = Annales du Muséum National Botaniques. d’Histoire Naturelle. [“National” dropped after vol. 5.] Aiken, S. G. et al. 2007. Flora of the Canadian Arctic Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B = Annalen des Naturhistorischen Archipelago.... Ottawa. [CD-ROM.] Museums in Wien. Serie B, Botanik und Zoologie. Aiton, W. 1789. Hortus Kewensis; or, a Catalogue of the Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. = Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Plants Cultivated in the Royal Botanic Garden at Kew. Botanique. 3 vols. London. (Hort. Kew.) Ann. Sci. Nat. (Paris) = Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Aiton, W. and W. T. Aiton. 1810–1813. Hortus Kewensis; or a (Paris.) Catalogue of the Plants Cultivated in the Royal Botanic Anticancer Res. = Anticancer Research. Garden at Kew. 5 vols. London. (Hortus Kew.) Antieau, C. J. 1985. Patterns of Natural Variation in Aldasoro, J. J. et al. 1998. The genus Sorbus (Maloideae, Oceanspray, Holodiscus discolor (Pursh) Maxim. Rosaceae) in Europe and North Africa: Morphological (Rosaceae). M.S. thesis. University of Washington. analysis and systematics. Syst. Bot. 23: 189–208. Arbor. Frutic. Brit.—See: J. C. Loudon [1835–]1838 Aldasoro, J. J. et al. 2004. Revision of Sorbus subgenera Arbor. Kórnickie = Arboretum Kórnickie. Aria and Torminaria (Rosaceae—Maloideae). Syst. Bot. Arbust. Amer.—See: H. Marshall 1785 Monogr. 69: 1–148. Arnott, G. A. W. 1832. Botany. Edinburgh. [Preprinted from Aldasoro, J. J., C. Aedo, and F. Muñoz Garmendia. 1996. M. Napier, ed. 1830–1842. Encyclopaedia Britannica..., The genus Pyrus L. (Rosaceae) in south-west Europe ed. 7. 21 vols. Edinburgh. Vol. 5.] (Botany) and North Africa. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 121: 143–158. Asami, Y. 1927. The Crabapples and Nectarines of Japan.... Aldasoro, J. J., C. Aedo, and C. Navarro. 2005. Phylogenetic Tokyo. and phytogeographical relationships in Maloideae Ascherson, P. F. A. 1859–1864. Flora der Provinz (Rosaceae) based on morphological and anatomical Brandenburg.... 3 vols. Berlin. (Fl. Brandenburg) characters. Blumea 50: 3–32. Ascherson, P. F. A. et al. 1896–1939. Synopsis der Alice, L. A. and C. S. Campbell. 1999. Phylogeny of Rubus mitteleuropäischen Flora. 12 vols., some in parts. (Rosaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal Leipzig. (Syn. Mitteleur. Fl.) transcribed spacer region sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 86: Ashe, W. W. 1903. Amelanchier obovalis. Bot. Gaz. 35: 81–97. 434. Alice, L. A., T. M. Dodson, and B. L. Sutherland. 2008. Atkinson, S. and F. Sharpe. 1993. Wild Plants of the San Juan Diversity and relationships of Bhutanese Rubus. Acta Islands, ed. 2. Seattle. Hort. 777: 63–70. Atlantic J. = Atlantic Journal, and Friend of Knowledge. Allan, H. H. et al. 1961–2000. Flora of New Zealand. Austral. Syst. Bot. = Australian Systematic Botany. 5 vols. Wellington, Christchurch, and Lincoln. (Fl. Autik. Bot.—See: C. S. Rafinesque 1840 New Zealand) Bailey, L. H. 1941–1945. Species batorum. The genus Rubus Ambrose, K. V. 2006. Clarification of Basal Relationships in in North America (north of Mexico) I–X. Gentes Rubus (Rosaceae) and the Origin of Rubus chamaemorus. Herbarum 5: 1–918. M.S. thesis. Western Kentucky University. Bailey, L. H. and Bailey Hortorium Staff. 1949. Manual of Amer. Anthropol. = American Anthropologist. Cultivated Plants..., rev. ed. New York. [Reprinted Amer. J. Bot. = American Journal of Botany. 1951, New York.] Amer. J. Chin. Med. = The American Journal of Chinese Baillon, H. E. 1866–1895. Histoire des Plantes. 13 vols. Medicine. Paris, London, and Leipzig. (Hist. Pl.) Amer. Midl. Naturalist = American Midland Naturalist; Baird, J. R. and J. W. Thieret. 1989. The medlar (Mespilus Devoted to Natural History, Primarily That of the germanica, Rosaceae) from antiquity to obscurity. Econ. Prairie States. Bot. 43: 328–372. Anal. Fam. Pl.—See: B. C. J. Dumortier 1829 LITERATURE CITED 665 Baldwin, J. T. 1951. Chromosomes of Spiraea and of certain Bicknell, E. P. 1896b. The North American species of other genera of Rosaceae. Rhodora 53: 203–206. Agrimonia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 23: 508–523. Ball, P. W., B. Pawloski, and S. M. Walters. 1968. Potentilla. Bigelow, J. 1824. Florula Bostoniensis. A Collection of Plants In: T. G. Tutin et al., eds. 1964–1980. Flora Europaea. of Boston and Its Vicinity..., ed. 2. Boston. (Fl. Boston. 5 vols. Cambridge. Vol. 2, pp. 36–47. ed. 2) Bammi, R. K. and H. P. Olmo. 1966. Cytogenetics of Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind.—See: C. L. Blume 1825–1826[–1827] Rubus. V. Natural hybridization between R. procerus Biltmore Bot. Stud. = Biltmore Botanical Studies; a Journal of P. J. Muell. and R. laciniatus Willd. Evolution 20: 617– Botany Embracing Papers by the Director and Associates 633. of the Biltmore Herbarium. Banasiak, S. E. and S. J. Meiners. 2009. Long term dynamics Biochem. Syst. & Ecol. = Biochemical Systematics and of Rosa multiflora in a successional system. Biol. Ecology. Invasions 11: 215–224. Biol. Invasions = Biological Invasions. Barbour, M. G. 1970. The flora and plant communities of Biol. J. Linn. Soc. = Biological Journal of the Linnean Bodega Head, California. Madroño 20: 289–336. Society. Barnaulov, O. D. and P. P. Denisenko. 1980. Anti-ulcer action Biol. Pharm. Bull. = Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. of a decoction of the flowers of the dropwort,Filipendula Biol. Skr. = Biologiske Skrifter. ulmaria (L.) Maxim. [In Russian.] Farmakol. Toksikol. Bitter, F. A. G. [1910–]1911. Die Gattung Acaena. Biblioth. 43: 700–705. Bot. 74. Bartish, I. V., B. Hylmö, and H. Nybom. 2001. RAPD analysis Blanchard, W. H. 1907. Our eastern shadwoods. Torreya 7: of intraspecific relationships in presumably apomictic 97–102. Cotoneaster species. Euphytica 120: 273–280. Blue Jay = Blue Jay; Bulletin of the Yorktown Natural History Barton, W. P. C. 1817–1819. Vegetable Materia Medica Society. of the United States; or Medical Botany, Containing a Bluff, M. J., C. A. Fingerhuth, and C. F. W. Wallroth. Botanical, General, and Medical History, of Medicinal 1825–1833. Compendium Florae Germaniae. 4 vols. Plants Indigenous to the United States. 2 vols. in 4 parts Nuremberg. (Comp. Fl. German.) each.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date
    Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date EQUISETACEAE HORSETAIL FAMILY Equisetum arvense L. Field Horsetail FF Equisetum fluviatile L. Water Horsetail LRB Equisetum hyemale L. ssp. affine (Engelm.) Stone Common Scouring-rush BS Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun Smooth Scouring-rush WM Equisetum variegatum Scheich. ex Fried. ssp. Small Horsetail LRB Variegatum DENNSTAEDIACEAE BRACKEN FAMILY Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn Bracken-Fern COF DRYOPTERIDACEAE TRUE FERN FAMILILY Athyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth ssp. angustum (Willd.) Northeastern Lady Fern FF Clausen Cystopteris bulbifera (L.) Bernh. Bulblet Fern FF Dryopteris carthusiana (Villars) H.P. Fuchs Spinulose Woodfern FF Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. Ostrich Fern FF Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern FF Polystichum acrostichoides (Michaux) Schott Christmas Fern FF ADDER’S-TONGUE- OPHIOGLOSSACEAE FERN FAMILY Botrychium virginianum (L.) Sw. Rattlesnake Fern FF FLOWERING FERN OSMUNDACEAE FAMILY Osmunda regalis L. Royal Fern WM POLYPODIACEAE POLYPODY FAMILY Polypodium virginianum L. Rock Polypody FF MAIDENHAIR FERN PTERIDACEAE FAMILY Adiantum pedatum L. ssp. pedatum Northern Maidenhair Fern FF THELYPTERIDACEAE MARSH FERN FAMILY Thelypteris palustris (Salisb.) Schott Marsh Fern WM LYCOPODIACEAE CLUB MOSS FAMILY Lycopodium lucidulum Michaux Shining Clubmoss OF Lycopodium tristachyum Pursh Ground-cedar COF SELAGINELLACEAE SPIKEMOSS FAMILY Selaginella apoda (L.) Fern. Spikemoss LRB CUPRESSACEAE CYPRESS FAMILY Juniperus communis L. Common Juniper Jun-E DS Juniperus virginiana L. Red Cedar Jun-E SD Thuja occidentalis L. White Cedar LRB PINACEAE PINE FAMILY Larix laricina (Duroi) K. Koch Tamarack Jun LRB Pinus banksiana Lambert Jack Pine COF Pinus resinosa Sol. ex Aiton Red Pine Jun-M CF Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List 1 Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date Pinus strobus L.
    [Show full text]
  • Vitales, C Nymphaeales Austrobaileyales
    Amborellales Vitales, C Nymphaeales Austrobaileyales Acorales G Eenzaadlobbigen G Alismatales Vitales Petrosaviales Pandanales De Wijnstokfamilie (Vitaceae), d Dioscoreales vroeger samen met de Wegedoo Liliales geplaatst, omdat in beide famil Asparagales kroonbladen staan. Dat de Vital Arecales maar niet precies waar. Hiervoo G Commeliniden G Dasypogonales Poales Commelinales Crossosomatales Zingiberales Deze nieuwe orde in de Rosiden ordes en wordt ondersteund do Ceratophyllales kenmerken, zoals de structuur v Chloranthales afkomstig uit de Violales, Celast Het zijn 5 kleine families uit wa Canellales Piperales Aphloiaceae, Geissolomataceae G Magnoliiden G Magnoliales Stachyuraceae, en 2 iets grotere Laurales (Staphyleacea) en de Crossosom Ranunculales Sabiales Proteales Vitaceae Trochodendrales Buxales Aphloiacea Geissoloma Gunnerales Ixerbaceae Berberidopsidales Strasburge Dilleniales Staphyleac Caryophyllales Stachyurac Santalales Crossosom Saxifragales Melianthac G Geavanceerde tweezaadlobbigen G Vitales Francoacea Crossosomatales Ledocarpa Geraniales Vivianiacea Myrtales Geraniacea Zygophyllales Combretac Celastrales Lythraceae Malpighiales Onagracea G Fabiden G Oxalidales Vochysiace Fabales Myrtaceae G Rosiden G Rosales Crypteroni Cucurbitales Alzateacea Fagales Rhynchoca Oliniaceae Brassicales Penaeacea G G Malviden Malvales Melastoma Sapindales Cornales kenmerken. Uit de Polygalales z Ericales G Asteriden G erbij gevoegd, een kleine famili Garryales Afrika en Amerika. G Lamiiden G Gentianales De bladeren zijn meestal tegeno Solanales
    [Show full text]
  • THE GENETIC DIVERSITY and POPULATION STRUCTURE of GEUM RADIATUM: EFFECTS of NATURAL HISTORY and CONSERVATION EFFORTS a Thesis B
    THE GENETIC DIVERSITY AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF GEUM RADIATUM: EFFECTS OF NATURAL HISTORY AND CONSERVATION EFFORTS A Thesis by NIKOLAI M. HAY Submitted to the Graduate School at Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2017 Department of Biology ! THE GENETIC DIVERSITY AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF GEUM RADIATUM: EFFECTS OF NATURAL HISTORY AND CONSERVATION EFFORTS A Thesis by NIKOLAI M. HAY December 2017 APPROVED BY: Matt C. Estep Chairperson, Thesis Committee Zack E. Murrell Member, Thesis Committee Ray Williams Member, Thesis Committee Zack E Murrell Chairperson, Department of Biology Max C. Poole, Ph.D. Dean, Cratis D. Williams School of Graduate Studies ! Copyright by Nikolai M. Hay 2017 All Rights Reserved ! Abstract THE GENETIC DIVERSITY AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF GEUM RADIATUM: EFFECTS OF NATURAL HISTORY AND CONSERVATION EFFORTS Nikolai M. Hay B.S., Appalachian State University M.S., Appalachian State University Chairperson: Matt C. Estep Geum radiatum is a federally endangered high-elevation rock outcrop endemic herb that is widely recognized as a hexaploid and a relic species. Little is currently known about G. radiatum genetic diversity, population interactions, or the effect of augmentations. This study sampled every known population of G. radiatum and used microsatellite markers to observe the alleles present at 8 loci. F-statistics, STRUCTURE, GENODIVE, and the R package polysat were used to measure diversity and genetic structure. The analysis demonstrates that there is interconnectedness and structure of populations and was able to locate augmented and punitive hybrids individuals within an augmented population. Geum radiautm has diversity among and between populations and suggests current gene flow in the northern populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List
    Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List Disclaimer Lake Havasu City has revised the recommended landscaping plant list. This new list consists of plants that can be adapted to desert environments in the Southwestern United States. This list only contains water conscious species classified as having very low, low, and low-medium water use requirements. Species that are classified as having medium or higher water use requirements were not permitted on this list. Such water use classification is determined by the type of plant, its average size, and its water requirements compared to other plants. For example, a large tree may be classified as having low water use requirements if it requires a low amount of water compared to most other large trees. This list is not intended to restrict what plants residents choose to plant in their yards, and this list may include plant species that may not survive or prosper in certain desert microclimates such as those with lower elevations or higher temperatures. In addition, this list is not intended to be a list of the only plants allowed in the region, nor is it intended to be an exhaustive list of all desert-appropriate plants capable of surviving in the region. This list was created with the intention to help residents, businesses, and landscapers make informed decisions on which plants to landscape that are water conscious and appropriate for specific environmental conditions. Lake Havasu City does not require the use of any or all plants found on this list. List Characteristics This list is divided between trees, shrubs, groundcovers, vines, succulents and perennials.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Session Abstracts ORALS–MONDAY 102Nd Annual International Conference of the American Society for Horticultural Science Las Vegas, Nevada
    Oral Session Abstracts ORALS–MONDAY 102nd Annual International Conference of the American Society for Horticultural Science Las Vegas, Nevada Presenting authors are denoted by an astrisk (*) the CP treatment had a higher Area Under the Disease Progress Curve than the NST treatment in tomato in 2003. Overall, disease pressure was highest in tomato in 2001. But disease levels within years were Oral Session 1—Organic Horticulture mostly unaffected by amendment treatments. In cabbage, disease was more common in 2002 than in 2003, although head rot was more Moderator: Matthew D. Kleinhenz prevalent in compost-amended plots in 2003 than in manure-amended 18 July 2005, 2:00–4:00 p.m. Ballroom H or control plots. Tomato postharvest quality parameters were similar among amendment and weed treatments within each year. Soil amend- Weed Control in Organic Vegetable Production: The Use ment may enhance crop yield and quality in a transitional-organic of Sweet Corn Transplants and Vinegar system. Also, weed management strategy can alter weed populations and perhaps disease levels. Albert H. Markhart, III *1, Milton J. Harr 2, Paul Burkhouse 3 Consumer Sensory Evaluation of Organically and Con- 1University of Minnesota, Horticultural Science, 223 Alderman Hall, St. Paul, MN, 55108; 2Southwest State University, Southwest Research and Outreach Center, Lamberton, MN, ventionally Grown Spinach 56512; 3Farm, Foxtail Farm, Shafer, MN, 55074 Xin Zhao *1, Edward E. Carey 1, Fadi M. Aramouni2 Weed control in organic vegetable production is a major challenge. 1Kansas State University, Horticulture, Forestry and Recreation Resources, 2021 Throck- During Summer 2004, we conducted fi eld trials to manage weeds in morton Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506; 2Kansas State University, Animal Sciences and organic sweet corn, carrots and onions.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • City of Santa Barbara Suggested Parkway Plantings
    City of Santa Barbara Suggested Parkway Plantings In order to sustain the health of street trees, parkways must only contain street trees, plants whose maximum height is less than 8 inches tall, and/or living ground cover (mulch). Concrete, asphalt, brick, gravel or otherwise filling up the ground area around any tree so as to substantially shut off air, light or water from its roots is not allowed. Below, you will find several suggested species of groundcovers and other perennials that may be a good choice, depending on the environmental conditions in your parkway. This list is not intended to be limiting or comprehensive, but rather a starting point for planting ideas. If you have any questions about parkway plantings or groundcovers, or if you are interested in planting, modifying or removing City street trees, please contact the Parks Division at (805) 564-5433 and visit www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/UrbanForest Muehlenbeckia axillaris (Creeping Wire Vine) DESCRIPTION: Evergreen ground-hugging vine 2-6“ tall. Can be mowed occasionally. Forms a tight mat, spreading by underground stems. Tiny 1/8 in. long, dark glossy green leaves and translucent white fruits. Stands up to foot traffic well. Best in small areas or rock gardens. CULTURAL CONDITIONS: Full sun to part shade. Tolerates poor soils but prefers well draining soils. May need some summer water but is drought tolerant once established. Dymondia margaretae (no common name) DESCRIPTION: Evergreen perennial 2-3“ tall, spreading but not invasive. Forms a tight, weed- resistant mat. Leaves are narrow, gray-green, with edges rolled up. Flowers are small yellow daisies tucked into foliage, in summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakland Nurseries Inc Coral Beauty Cotoneaster
    Coral Beauty Cotoneaster Cotoneaster dammeri 'Coral Beauty' Height: 12 inches Spread: 5 feet Sunlight: Hardiness Zone: 5a Other Names: Bearberry Cotoneaster Coral Beauty Cotoneaster Description: Photo courtesy of NetPS Plant Finder One of the best low spreading groundcovers, featuring white flowers in spring and showy coral pink fruit in fall; evergreen leaves require adequate snow cover or protection from winter sun and wind in exposed locations Ornamental Features Coral Beauty Cotoneaster is primarily grown for its highly ornamental fruit. It features an abundance of magnificent coral-pink berries from late summer to late fall. It features tiny clusters of white flowers along the branches in late spring. It has dark green foliage. The small glossy oval leaves turn an outstanding brick red in the fall. Landscape Attributes Coral Beauty Cotoneaster is a multi-stemmed evergreen shrub with a shapely form and gracefully arching branches. It lends an extremely fine and delicate texture to the landscape composition which should be used to full effect. Coral Beauty Cotoneaster flowers Photo courtesy of NetPS Plant Finder This shrub will require occasional maintenance and upkeep, and should not require much pruning, except when necessary, such as to remove dieback. Deer don't particularly care for this plant and will usually leave it alone in favor of tastier treats. Gardeners should be aware of the following characteristic(s) that may warrant special consideration; - Insects Columbus Garden Center - 1156 Oakland Park Avenue, Columbus, OH 43224-3317
    [Show full text]
  • They Come in Teams
    GBE Frankia-Enriched Metagenomes from the Earliest Diverging Symbiotic Frankia Cluster: They Come in Teams Thanh Van Nguyen1, Daniel Wibberg2, Theoden Vigil-Stenman1,FedeBerckx1, Kai Battenberg3, Kirill N. Demchenko4,5, Jochen Blom6, Maria P. Fernandez7, Takashi Yamanaka8, Alison M. Berry3, Jo¨ rn Kalinowski2, Andreas Brachmann9, and Katharina Pawlowski 1,* 1Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Sweden 2Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, Germany 3Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis 4Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Development, Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia 5Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Saint Petersburg, Russia 6Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany 7Ecologie Microbienne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 5557, Universite Lyon I, Villeurbanne Cedex, France 8Forest and Forestry Products Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan 9Biocenter, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted: July 10, 2019 Data deposition: This project has been deposited at EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ under the accession PRJEB19438 - PRJEB19449. Abstract Frankia strains induce the formation of nitrogen-fixing nodules on roots of actinorhizal plants. Phylogenetically, Frankia strains can be grouped in four clusters. The earliest divergent cluster, cluster-2, has a particularly wide host range. The analysis of cluster-2 strains has been hampered by the fact that with two exceptions, they could never be cultured. In this study, 12 Frankia-enriched meta- genomes of Frankia cluster-2 strains or strain assemblages were sequenced based on seven inoculum sources. Sequences obtained via DNA isolated from whole nodules were compared with those of DNA isolated from fractionated preparations enhanced in the Frankia symbiotic structures.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGICAL Evaluation Analysis Uint 23 9/13/2010
    BIOLOGICAL Evaluation Analysis Uint 23 9/13/2010 BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF FOREST MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES PROPOSED FOR ANALYSIS UNIT 23 (Compartments 253, 254, 255, 256, 257 and 259) Gloster and Crosby Quadrangles USDA Forest Service Southern Region (8) National Forests in Mississippi Homochitto National Forest Homochitto Ranger District Mississippi Prepared by: Kenneth L. Gordon _____________________________ Date____________________ Wildlife Biologist, USDA Forest Service Concurred by: KATHY W. LUNCEFORD _____________________ Date____________________ Environmental Coordinator for Mississippi, US Fish and Wildlife Service Homochitto Ranger District Page 1 BIOLOGICAL Evaluation Analysis Uint 23 9/13/2010 Introduction This Biological Evaluation (BE) documents the likely impacts on proposed, endangered, threatened, and sensitive (TES) species from forest management activities proposed for Analysis Unit 23. AU 23 is located in Amite and Wilkinson counties, Mississippi and is part of the Foster Creek subwatershed in the Homochitto River basin.. As a result of a recent court decision, Forest Plan Amendment # 16 and the Region 8 Supplement to FSM 2670 are no longer in effect. This BE follows the process used to decide when to inventory for TES species that is consistent with the requirement found in the Vegetation Management EIS for the Coastal Plain and Piedmont. This BE is in accordance with direction given in Forest Service Manual (FSM) 2672 to meet the 1989 Vegetation Management standard. As part of the NEPA decision making process, the BE provides a review of Forest Service (FS) activities in sufficient detail to determine how an action will affect any TES species. TES species, taken from both state and federal lists, are species whose viability is most likely to be put at risk from management actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleogyne Ramosissima) Shrublands in the Mojave Desert
    Plant Community Patterns in Unburned and Burned Blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima) Shrublands in the Mojave Desert Prepared by Matthew L. Brooks & John R. Matchett United States Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center, Las Vegas Field Station 6770 South Paradise Rd., Las Vegas, Nevada 89119-3721 voice: 702-914-2206 x225; fax: 702-914-2045; email: [email protected] Report prepared for National Park Service, Pacific West Region, Fire Management 1111 Jackson St. Suite 700 Oakland, CA 94607 12/20/01 2 Executive Summary This report is the first product of a larger research project titled “fire behavior and ecological effects in blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima) shrublands and invasive annual grasslands of the Mojave Desert.” The results contained herein are baseline comparisons of unburned and burned blackbrush vegetation sampled in spring 2001, prior to the application of experimental fire and herbicide treatments that will begin in spring 2002. The significant findings from these baseline comparisons are that: • species richness in blackbrush vegetation is not low as is generally believed, and is comparable to other vegetation types • patterns of species richness can vary significantly between 1- and 1000-m2 spatial scales, indicating that vegetation monitoring for species diversity in blackbrush should incorporate multi-scale sampling • total cover 6-14 years postfire recovered to levels in unburned blackbrush, but cover was still reduced for woody perennials and increased for annual forbs, annual grasses, herbaceous perennials, and perennial grasses • postfire composition of plant communities can vary widely after blackbrush is burned, but fire generally increases species evenness and decreases species richness • alien annual grasses do not always dominate postfire landscapes, especially when previous years of low rainfall may have reduced their population densities At the time this report was prepared, a similar manuscript was submitted by the authors for review in the scientific journal Western North American Naturalist.
    [Show full text]