DOCSLIB.ORG

Master Species List for Temple Ambler Field Station

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Master Species List for Temple Ambler Field Station Temple Ambler Field Station master species' list Figure 1. Animal groups identified to date through our citizen science initiatives at Temple Ambler Field Station. Values represent unique taxa identified in the field to the lowest taxonomic level possible. These data were collected by field citizen scientists during events on campus or were recorded in public databases (iNaturalist and eBird). Want to become a Citizen Science Owlet too? Check out our Citizen Science webpage. Any questions, issues or concerns regarding these data, please contact us at [email protected] (fieldstation[at}temple[dot]edu) Temple Ambler Field Station master species' list Figure 2. Plant diversity identified to date in the natural environments and designed gardens of the Temple Ambler Field Station and Ambler Arboretum. These values represent unique taxa identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible. Highlighted are 14 of the 116 flowering plant families present that include 524 taxonomic groups. A full list can be found in our species database. Cultivated specimens in our Greenhouse were not included here. Any questions, issues or concerns regarding these data, please contact us at [email protected] (fieldstation[at}temple[dot]edu) Temple Ambler Field Station master species' list database_title Temple Ambler Field Station master species' list last_update 22October2020 description This database includes all species identified to their lowest taxonomic level possible in the natural environments and designed gardens on the Temple Ambler campus. These are occurrence records and each taxa is only entered once. This is an occurrence record, not an abundance record. IDs were performed by senior scientists and specialists, as well as citizen scientists visiting campus. Field identifications were recorded and than verified against the GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) backbone for normalization of species names. This is a living database and will be updated accordingly as new identifications are incorporated or verified. Any questions, issues or concerns regarding these data, please contact us at [email protected] (fieldstation[at}temple[dot]edu) column_names column_descriptions rank lowest taxonomic id for given individual(s) within databases kingdom "kingdom" classification following GBIF list. Animalia, Archaea, Bacteria, Chromista, Fungi, Platae, Protozoa, Viruses. These are major classifications and do not express phylogenetic relationships. phylum all current accepted phyla according to GBIF class all current accepted classes according to GBIF order all current accepted orders according to GBIF family all current accepted families according to GBIF genus all current accepted genus according to GBIF species binomial scientific name of a given species notes any memo related to that species entry in the database Any questions, issues or concerns regarding these data, please contact us at [email protected] (fieldstation[at}temple[dot]edu) Temple Ambler Field Station master species' list rank kingdom phylum class order family genus species notes SPECIES Animalia Annelida Clitellata Crassiclitellata Lumbricidae Lumbricus Lumbricus terrestris GENUS Animalia Annelida Polychaeta Eunicida Lumbrineridae Lumbrineris GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Arachnida Araneae Agelenidae Agelenopsis FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Arachnida Araneae Araneidae FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Arachnida Araneae Salticidae SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Arachnida Araneae Tetragnathidae Leucauge Leucauge venusta SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Arachnida Araneae Thomisidae Misumenoides Misumenoides formosipes ORDER Animalia Arthropoda Arachnida Opiliones GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Arachnida Opiliones Sclerosomatidae Leiobunum ORDER Animalia Arthropoda Chilopoda Geophilomorpha FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Chilopoda Lithobiomorpha Lithobiidae CLASS Animalia Arthropoda Diplopoda GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Diplopoda Polydesmida Eurymerodesmidae Eurymerodesmus SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Diplopoda Polydesmida Paradoxosomatidae Oxidus Oxidus gracilis ORDER Animalia Arthropoda Entognatha Collembola GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Blattodea Corydiidae Polyphaga ORDER Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera Buprestidae Agrilus Agrilus planipennis FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera Carabidae FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera Cerambycidae Any questions, issues or concerns regarding these data, please contact us at [email protected] (fieldstation[at}temple[dot]edu) Temple Ambler Field Station master species' list rank kingdom phylum class order family genus species notes FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera Chrysomelidae FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera Coccinellidae FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera Cucujidae FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera Curculionidae FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera Elateridae SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera Elateridae Alaus Alaus oculatus FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Coleoptera Tenebrionidae ORDER Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Calliphoridae FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Culicidae SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Drosophilidae Drosophila Drosophila melanogaster SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Rhagionidae Chrysopilus Chrysopilus thoracicus FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Syrphidae GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Syrphidae Syrphus FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Tabanidae GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Tabanidae Chrysops FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Tipulidae ORDER Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Acanaloniidae GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Aphalaridae Pachypsylla Any questions, issues or concerns regarding these data, please contact us at [email protected] (fieldstation[at}temple[dot]edu) Temple Ambler Field Station master species' list rank kingdom phylum class order family genus species notes FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Berytidae SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Cicadellidae Graphocephala Graphocephala coccinea FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Cicadidae FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Coreidae FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Corixidae GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Flatidae Flatormenis SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Fulgoridae Lycorma Lycorma delicatula SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Lygaeidae Oncopeltus Oncopeltus fasciatus SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Pentatomidae Halyomorpha Halyomorpha halys SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Pentatomidae Oebalus Oebalus pugnax FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hemiptera Pseudococcidae SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Apidae Apis Apis mellifera SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus Bombus impatiens SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus Bombus pensylvanicus FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Braconidae GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Eumenidae Polistes FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Halictidae SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Halictidae Agapostemon Agapostemon virescens SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Scoliidae Scolia Scolia bicincta SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Vespidae Dolichovespula Dolichovespula maculata Any questions, issues or concerns regarding these data, please contact us at [email protected] (fieldstation[at}temple[dot]edu) Temple Ambler Field Station master species' list rank kingdom phylum class order family genus species notes SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Vespidae Vespula Vespula maculifrons SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Arctiidae Lophocampa Lophocampa caryae SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Crambidae Nomophila Nomophila nearctica SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Erebidae Herminia Herminia pedipilalis GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Erebidae Idia SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Erebidae Phalaenophana Phalaenophana pyramusalis GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Geometridae Disclisioprocta SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Hesperiidae Atalopedes Atalopedes campestris SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Noctuidae Spodoptera Spodoptera ornithogalli SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Danaus Danaus plexippus SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Junonia Junonia coenia SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Limenitis Limenitis arthemis SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Polygonia Polygonia comma SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Vanessa Vanessa atalanta SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Vanessa Vanessa cardui SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Vanessa Vanessa virginiensis GENUS Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Papilionidae Pterourus SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Pieridae Colias Colias eurytheme SPECIES Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Lepidoptera Pieridae Pieris Pieris rapae FAMILY Animalia Arthropoda Insecta Neuroptera Chrysopidae Any questions, issues or concerns regarding these data, please contact us at [email protected]
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Paralogs in Target Enrichment Data Pinpoints Multiple Ancient Polyploidy Events
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.21.261925; this version posted August 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 1 Analysis of paralogs in target enrichment data pinpoints multiple ancient polyploidy events 2 in Alchemilla s.l. (Rosaceae). 3 4 Diego F. Morales-Briones1.2,*, Berit Gehrke3, Chien-Hsun Huang4, Aaron Liston5, Hong Ma6, 5 Hannah E. Marx7, David C. Tank2, Ya Yang1 6 7 1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 Gortner 8 Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA 9 2Department of Biological Sciences and Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, 10 University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive MS 3051, Moscow, ID 83844, USA 11 3University Gardens, University Museum, University of Bergen, Mildeveien 240, 5259 12 Hjellestad, Norway 13 4State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics 14 and Development, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological 15 Engineering, Institute of Plant Biology, Center of Evolutionary Biology, School of Life Sciences, 16 Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China 17 5Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, 2082 Cordley Hall, 18 Corvallis, OR 97331, USA 19 6Department of Biology, the Huck Institute of the Life Sciences, the Pennsylvania State 20 University, 510D Mueller Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802 USA 21 7Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 22 48109-1048, USA 23 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.21.261925; this version posted August 23, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphorbia Subg
    ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ БЮДЖЕТНОЕ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЕ НАУКИ БОТАНИЧЕСКИЙ ИНСТИТУТ ИМ. В.Л. КОМАРОВА РОССИЙСКОЙ АКАДЕМИИ НАУК На правах рукописи Гельтман Дмитрий Викторович ПОДРОД ESULA РОДА EUPHORBIA (EUPHORBIACEAE): СИСТЕМА, ФИЛОГЕНИЯ, ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ 03.02.01 — ботаника ДИССЕРТАЦИЯ на соискание ученой степени доктора биологических наук САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГ 2015 2 Оглавление Введение ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Глава 1. Род Euphorbia и основные проблемы его систематики ......................................... 9 1.1. Общая характеристика и систематическое положение .......................................... 9 1.2. Краткая история таксономического изучения и формирования системы рода ... 10 1.3. Основные проблемы систематики рода Euphorbia и его подрода Esula на рубеже XX–XXI вв. и пути их решения ..................................................................................... 15 Глава 2. Материал и методы исследования ........................................................................... 17 Глава 3. Построение системы подрода Esula рода Euphorbia на основе молекулярно- филогенетического подхода ...................................................................................................... 24 3.1. Краткая история молекулярно-филогенетического изучения рода Euphorbia и его подрода Esula ......................................................................................................... 24 3.2. Результаты молекулярно-филогенетического
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialist Foragers in Forest Bee Communities Are Small, Social Or Emerge Early
    Received: 5 November 2018 | Accepted: 2 April 2019 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13003 RESEARCH ARTICLE Specialist foragers in forest bee communities are small, social or emerge early Colleen Smith1,2 | Lucia Weinman1,2 | Jason Gibbs3 | Rachael Winfree2 1GraDuate Program in Ecology & Evolution, Rutgers University, New Abstract Brunswick, New Jersey 1. InDiviDual pollinators that specialize on one plant species within a foraging bout 2 Department of Ecology, Evolution, and transfer more conspecific and less heterospecific pollen, positively affecting plant Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey reproDuction. However, we know much less about pollinator specialization at the 3Department of Entomology, University of scale of a foraging bout compared to specialization by pollinator species. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CanaDa 2. In this stuDy, we measured the Diversity of pollen carried by inDiviDual bees forag- Correspondence ing in forest plant communities in the miD-Atlantic United States. Colleen Smith Email: [email protected] 3. We found that inDiviDuals frequently carried low-Diversity pollen loaDs, suggest- ing that specialization at the scale of the foraging bout is common. InDiviDuals of Funding information Xerces Society for Invertebrate solitary bee species carried higher Diversity pollen loaDs than Did inDiviDuals of Conservation; Natural Resources social bee species; the latter have been better stuDied with respect to foraging Conservation Service; GarDen Club of America bout specialization, but account for a small minority of the worlD’s bee species. Bee boDy size was positively correlated with pollen load Diversity, and inDiviDuals HanDling EDitor: Julian Resasco of polylectic (but not oligolectic) species carried increasingly Diverse pollen loaDs as the season progresseD, likely reflecting an increase in the Diversity of flowers in bloom.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Plant Patent (10) Patent N0.: US PP19,306 P2 Hawks (45) Date of Patent: Oct
    USO0PP19306P2 (12) United States Plant Patent (10) Patent N0.: US PP19,306 P2 Hawks (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 7, 2008 (54) CHRYSOGONUM PLANT NAMED ‘QUINN’S (52) US. Cl. ..................................................... .. Plt./373 GOLD’ (58) Field of Classi?cation Search .... .. Flt/373 See application ?le for complete search history. (50) Latin Name: Chrysogonum virginianum _ _ Varietal Denomination: Quinn’s Gold Prlmary ExamnferiAnnene H Para_ Asszslanl Exammeris. B. McCormick-Ewoldt (76) Inventor: Kimberly T. Hawks, 2056 Crawford (74) A210" "6)’; Agent) 0" Firmipenny J~ Aguirre 0‘) Notice? sublectfo any di5C1aimer,_thetermOfthi5 A new cultivar of Chrysogonum virginianum, ‘Quinn’s Pawnt 15 extended Or adlusted under 35 Gold’, characterized by its ?owers that emerge gold in color U-S~C~ 154(1)) by 0 days- and change with maturity to yellow and creamy white imparting the appearance of multicolored ?owers, its long (21) Appl. No.: 11/906,656 blooming habit, its vigorous growth habit, its ease of _ _ propagation, its drought tolerance and its hardiness in at (22) Flled' Oct‘ 4’ 2007 least U.S.D.A. Zones 5 to 9. (51) Int. Cl. A01H 5/00 (2006.01) 2 Drawing Sheets 1 2 Botanical classi?cation: Chrysogonum virginianum. 6. ‘Quinn’s Gold’ is cold hardy at least in U.S.D.A. Zones Variety denomination: ‘Quinn’s Gold’. 5 to 9. The new Chrysogonum is unique in comparison to other BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION cultivars and species of Chrysogonum known to the inventor. 5 The parent plants, unnamed plants of Chrysogonum The present mvent1on relates to a new and d1 stmct cultivar virginianum, produce ?owers that are gold throughout devel of Chrysogonum virginianum and will be referred to hereaf opment and do not lighten to yellow and creamy white as ter by its cultivar name, ‘Quinn’s Gold’.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date
    Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date EQUISETACEAE HORSETAIL FAMILY Equisetum arvense L. Field Horsetail FF Equisetum fluviatile L. Water Horsetail LRB Equisetum hyemale L. ssp. affine (Engelm.) Stone Common Scouring-rush BS Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun Smooth Scouring-rush WM Equisetum variegatum Scheich. ex Fried. ssp. Small Horsetail LRB Variegatum DENNSTAEDIACEAE BRACKEN FAMILY Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn Bracken-Fern COF DRYOPTERIDACEAE TRUE FERN FAMILILY Athyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth ssp. angustum (Willd.) Northeastern Lady Fern FF Clausen Cystopteris bulbifera (L.) Bernh. Bulblet Fern FF Dryopteris carthusiana (Villars) H.P. Fuchs Spinulose Woodfern FF Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. Ostrich Fern FF Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern FF Polystichum acrostichoides (Michaux) Schott Christmas Fern FF ADDER’S-TONGUE- OPHIOGLOSSACEAE FERN FAMILY Botrychium virginianum (L.) Sw. Rattlesnake Fern FF FLOWERING FERN OSMUNDACEAE FAMILY Osmunda regalis L. Royal Fern WM POLYPODIACEAE POLYPODY FAMILY Polypodium virginianum L. Rock Polypody FF MAIDENHAIR FERN PTERIDACEAE FAMILY Adiantum pedatum L. ssp. pedatum Northern Maidenhair Fern FF THELYPTERIDACEAE MARSH FERN FAMILY Thelypteris palustris (Salisb.) Schott Marsh Fern WM LYCOPODIACEAE CLUB MOSS FAMILY Lycopodium lucidulum Michaux Shining Clubmoss OF Lycopodium tristachyum Pursh Ground-cedar COF SELAGINELLACEAE SPIKEMOSS FAMILY Selaginella apoda (L.) Fern. Spikemoss LRB CUPRESSACEAE CYPRESS FAMILY Juniperus communis L. Common Juniper Jun-E DS Juniperus virginiana L. Red Cedar Jun-E SD Thuja occidentalis L. White Cedar LRB PINACEAE PINE FAMILY Larix laricina (Duroi) K. Koch Tamarack Jun LRB Pinus banksiana Lambert Jack Pine COF Pinus resinosa Sol. ex Aiton Red Pine Jun-M CF Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List 1 Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date Pinus strobus L.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclassification of North American Haplopappus (Compositae: Astereae) Completed: Rayjacksonia Gen
    AmericanJournal of Botany 83(3): 356-370. 1996. RECLASSIFICATION OF NORTH AMERICAN HAPLOPAPPUS (COMPOSITAE: ASTEREAE) COMPLETED: RAYJACKSONIA GEN. NOV.1 MEREDITH A. LANE2 AND RONALD L. HARTMAN R. L. McGregor Herbarium(University of Kansas NaturalHistory Museum Division of Botany) and Departmentof Botany,University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047-3729; and Rocky MountainHerbarium, Department of Botany,University of Wyoming,Laramie, Wyoming82071-3165 Rayjacksonia R. L. Hartman& M. A. Lane, gen. nov. (Compositae: Astereae), is named to accommodate the "phyllo- cephalus complex," formerlyof Haplopappus Cass. sect. Blepharodon DC. The new combinationsare R. phyllocephalus (DC.) R. L. Hartman& M. A. Lane, R. annua (Rydb.) R. L. Hartman& M. A. Lane, and R. aurea (A. Gray) R. L. Hartman & M. A. Lane. This transfercompletes the reclassificationof the North American species of Haplopappus sensu Hall, leaving that genus exclusively South American.Rayjacksonia has a base chromosomenumber of x = 6. Furthermore,it shares abruptlyampliate disk corollas, deltatedisk style-branchappendages, and corolla epidermalcell type,among other features,with Grindelia, Isocoma, Olivaea, Prionopsis, Stephanodoria, and Xanthocephalum.Phylogenetic analyses of morphologicaland chloroplastDNA restrictionsite data, taken together,demonstrate that these genera are closely related but distinct. Key words: Astereae; Asteraceae; Compositae; Haplopappus; Rayjacksonia. During the past seven decades, taxonomic application lopappus sensu Hall (1928) are reclassifiedand are cur-
    [Show full text]
  • Lundberg Et Al. 2009
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51 (2009) 269–280 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Allopolyploidy in Fragariinae (Rosaceae): Comparing four DNA sequence regions, with comments on classification Magnus Lundberg a,*, Mats Töpel b, Bente Eriksen b, Johan A.A. Nylander a, Torsten Eriksson a,c a Department of Botany, Stockholm University, SE-10691, Stockholm, Sweden b Department of Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg University, Box 461, SE-40530, Göteborg, Sweden c Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, SE-10405, Stockholm, Sweden article info abstract Article history: Potential events of allopolyploidy may be indicated by incongruences between separate phylogenies Received 23 June 2008 based on plastid and nuclear gene sequences. We sequenced two plastid regions and two nuclear ribo- Revised 25 February 2009 somal regions for 34 ingroup taxa in Fragariinae (Rosaceae), and six outgroup taxa. We found five well Accepted 26 February 2009 supported incongruences that might indicate allopolyploidy events. The incongruences involved Aphanes Available online 5 March 2009 arvensis, Potentilla miyabei, Potentilla cuneata, Fragaria vesca/moschata, and the Drymocallis clade. We eval- uated the strength of conflict and conclude that allopolyploidy may be hypothesised in the four first Keywords: cases. Phylogenies were estimated using Bayesian inference and analyses were evaluated using conver- Allopolyploidy gence diagnostics. Taxonomic implications are discussed for genera such as Alchemilla, Sibbaldianthe, Cha- Fragariinae Incongruence maerhodos, Drymocallis and Fragaria, and for the monospecific Sibbaldiopsis and Potaninia that are nested Molecular phylogeny inside other genera. Two orphan Potentilla species, P. miyabei and P. cuneata are placed in Fragariinae.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Winter 2002 Volume 48 Number 4
    BULLETIN WINTER 2002 VOLUME 48 NUMBER 4 Sarah P. Duke Gardens..................................................................................................................126 News from the Society Bill Dahl, Executive Director............................................................................................130 News from the Sections P Archives and History Section..........................................................................................130 Personalia Darbaker Prize, Dr. Arthur Grossman...........................................................................131 2002 Lawrence Memorial Award, Andrew L. Hipp.....................................................131 Plowman Research Award, Pedro Lezama Asencio................................................131 Courses/Workshops Highlands Biological Station Course Offerings in 2003...........................................132 Symposia, Conferences, Meetings Deep Achene: The Compositae Alliance First International Meeting, South Africa........................................................................................................133 Illinois Symposium on Invasive Species.....................................................................135 Second International Elm Conference.........................................................................135 4th International Plant Biomechanics Conference....................................................135 International Solanaceae Conference and Poster Photo Competition.................136 Other News Plant Group
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference SFA Gardens 2008 4th Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference David Creech Dept of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Greg Grant Stephen F. Austin State University James Kroll Arthur Temple College of Forestry and Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Dawn Stover Stephen F. Austin State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/sfa_gardens_lonestar Part of the Agricultural Education Commons, Botany Commons, Forest Sciences Commons, Horticulture Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons, and the Viticulture and Oenology Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Creech, David; Grant, Greg; Kroll, James; and Stover, Dawn, "4th Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference" (2008). Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference. 6. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/sfa_gardens_lonestar/6 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the SFA Gardens at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. • In 00 5' --. , In Associqtion with the cullowhee Nqtive plqnt Confetence Ptoceec!ings ofthe 4th Lone Stat Regional Native Plant Confetence Hoste~ by Stephen F. Austin St~te University Pineywoods N~tive PI~nt Centel' N~cogdoches, Texqs M~y 28-31,2008 Proceed ings ofthe 4th
    [Show full text]