The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 and Appendices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 and Appendices Contents Page Section 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Biodiversity action in Orkney – general outline of the Plan 6 1.2 Biodiversity Action Planning - the international and national contexts 6 • The Scottish Biodiversity Strategy 1.3 Recent developments in environmental legislation 8 • The Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 • The Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011 • The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 1.4 Biodiversity and the Local Authority Planning System 12 • The Orkney Local Development Plan 2012-2017 1.5 Community Planning 13 1.6 River Basin Management Planning 13 1.7 Biodiversity and rural development policy 14 • The Common Agricultural Policy • Scotland Rural Development Programme 2007-2013 1.8 Other relevant national publications 15 • Scotland’s Climate Change Adaptation Framework • Scotland’s Land Use Strategy • The Scottish Soil Framework 1.9 Links with the Orkney Biodiversity Records Centre 16 Section 2 Selection of the Ten Habitats for Inclusion in the Orkney Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 17 1 • Lowland fens 19 2 • Basin bog 27 3 • Eutrophic standing waters 33 4 • Mesotrophic lochs 41 5 • Ponds and milldams 47 6 • Burns and canalized burns 53 7 • Coastal sand dunes and links 60 8 • Aeolianite 70 9 • Coastal vegetated shingle 74 10 • Intertidal Underboulder Communities 80 Appendix I Species considered to be of conservation concern in Orkney Appendix II BAP habitats found in Orkney Appendix III The Aichi targets and goals 3 Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 Section 1 – Introduction What is biodiversity? a) Consider natural systems – by using The term ‘biodiversity’ means, quite simply, knowledge of interactions in nature and how the variety of species and genetic varieties ecosystems function. For example how that exist on earth - from the tiny microscopic changing water temperature affects fish organisms that are invisible to the naked eye species; how grazing animals or fertilizing to the mighty whales that swim in our oceans crops changes the balance of plant species; – as well as the habitats and ecosystems or how species interact through competition within which they live. and predation. This implies a need to consider the broad scale as well as the local; and the long term as well as the immediate. Why should we conserve biodiversity? Ecosystem function often shows a capacity to There are strong ethical reasons to conserve accommodate some change, but a significant biodiversity and it is recognised that it is impact may result when a threshold is wrong to let species decline in number and crossed and capacity exceeded. distribution until they become extinct, and to b) Take account of the services that treat nature as if it has been designed for our ecosystems provide – including those convenience and abuse. that underpin social and economic well However, as well as having its own intrinsic being, such as flood and climate regulation, value, biodiversity is our natural capital, resources for food, fibre or fuel, or for delivering ecosystem services that underpin recreation, culture and quality of life. For our economy and its deterioration and loss example: jeopardises the provision of these services. In • The likelihood of floods affecting our day to day lives we all benefit from these people’s homes depends in part ecosystem services, often in ways that we on how the land is used in the don’t immediately recognise. surrounding catchment • Everyone’s food resources depend What is the ecosystem approach? on clean water and productive soils A key underlying principle for the conservation • Our quality of life is enhanced by of biodiversity is the Ecosystem Approach, pleasant surroundings for work and defined by the Convention on Biological leisure Diversity (1994) as “A strategy for the integrated management of land, air, water and All these services are supplied by our living resources that promotes conservation ecosystems. There are ways to account for and sustainable use in an equitable way.”1 some of these services using economic and Climate change in particular, in addition to other measures to inform policy and consider other environmental changes, underlines offsetting or mitigation. the need for a long-term, ecosystem-based c) Involve people – those who benefit from approach. the ecosystem services and those managing An ecosystems approach is a set of principles them need to be involved in decisions that that can be applied to any plan or decision affect them. Their knowledge will often be that may positively or negatively affect the central to success. Public participation should environment, whether directly or indirectly.2 go beyond consultation to become real It is about making sure that we recognise involvement in decision making. and sustain the benefits provided by the environment, whilst delivering other economic Why is biodiversity under threat? and social goals. The steps needed to implement an ecosystems approach can be Alongside climate change, biodiversity loss is summarised in three main principles: recognised as a critical global environmental threat, and the two are inextricably linked. 1 http://biodiv.org/decisions/default.asp?lg=0&m=cop­ Not only will habitats and species be affected 05&d=06 directly by climate change and sea level rise 2 Applying an ecosystems approach to land use. but, probably as significant, they will also Scottish Government (2011) 4 Dingieshowe - Image courtesy of Drew Kennedy be affected by policy and behavioural shifts Biodiversity is inexorably linked to sustainable in other sectors such as agriculture, water, development, and a rich biodiversity transport and energy. 3 is generally associated with healthy Other pressures that contribute to a decline in environments. To ensure the survival of our biodiversity include: habitats and species, and to pass down a healthy stock of natural assets for future • loss of habitat and the resulting generations, we must accept that we play a degradation of ecosystems; defining role in the sustainability and health of • pollution, including nutrient our islands. As a consequence, we must all enrichment from diffuse forms of afford respect and protection to wildlife, along pollution; with the natural landscapes within which we live. It is important that we conserve the • over exploitation of natural resources; habitats and species which are rare or under • invasive non-native species that threat, but equally we must appreciate the threaten our native biodiversity and value of other more commonplace biodiversity are costly to eradicate or manage. and ensure its protection so that future generations can continue to benefit from it. 3 Conserving Biodiversity – The UK Approach (2007) 5 1.1 Biodiversity action in Orkney – general outline of the Plan By its nature, biodiversity action planning is a • Links with the Biodiversity Records developing process and this Plan represents Centre further progression of the original Orkney The second section begins with an Local Biodiversity Action Plan (2002). The first explanation of the process which led to review of the OLBAP which was undertaken selection of the ten Habitat Action Plans for in 2007 focused on ten Habitat Action Plans inclusion in this review of the OLBAP, then (HAPs) from the original Plan introducing new presents the ten HAPs and their revised objectives and targets as well as a set of targets and actions for the period 2013-2016. actions for each. In this, the second review The baseline information relating to each of the OLBAP, a similar approach has been habitat remains largely as it appeared in the taken and once more ten HAPs have been original Plan but has been updated to include selected for targeted action. The Audit and details relating to legislative and rural policy Habitat Action Plans from the OLBAP (2002) changes. The Steering Group would like to will continue to be relevant to the protection stress, however, that although it has chosen and enrichment of biodiversity in the Orkney to select a limited number of habitats to focus Isles and will provide the context to this more on over the next three years, it would still be focused Plan for 2013-2016. looking to others to progress conservation The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan activities to any or all of the remaining Orkney 2013-2016 comprises three sections. This, LBAP habitats and species as set out in the the first section, provides a brief overview original Plan. of changes which have been made to the The third section provides information which Biodiversity Action Planning System since relates biodiversity in Orkney to the Scottish the original OLBAP was produced as well as and UK frameworks. changes to environmental legislation, planning policy and rural development policy which will At national level the Scottish Biodiversity List contribute to influence biodiversity planning of priority species and habitats has been in the years to come. Section 1 covers the updated to fully incorporate recent changes to following areas: the UK BAP List. The Orkney lists of species and habitats have been amended to take • Biodiversity action planning – the account of these revisions and are included international context as Appendices I and II of this Plan. • The Scottish Biodiversity Strategy Ten years have elapsed since the Orkney • Recent developments in Biodiversity Audit was initially published and environmental legislation it is recognised that its species and habitats lists may need to be updated further to take • Biodiversity and the Local Authority land use planning system account of more recently collected recording data. A full review of the Biodiversity Audit will • Biodiversity and rural development therefore be undertaken during the lifetime of policy the Orkney LBAP 2013-2016. • Other relevant national publications 1.2 Biodiversity action planning in an international and national context In October 2010 officials from 192 countries and sustainable use of biodiversity. It also and the European Union – all signatories to ensures fair access to, and sharing the the Convention on Biological Diversity benefits from, global genetic resources.
Recommended publications
  • Species List
    1 of 16 Claypits 20/09/2021 species list Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records acarine Aceria macrorhyncha 2012 2012 1 acarine Aceria nalepai 2018 2018 1 amphibian Bufo bufo Common Toad 2001 2018 6 amphibian Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt 2001 2018 5 amphibian Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt 2001 2001 1 annelid Hirudinea Leech 2011 2011 1 bird Acanthis cabaret Lesser Redpoll 2013 2013 1 bird Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler 2001 2011 2 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 2011 2014 2 bird Alcedo atthis Kingfisher 2020 2020 1 bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 2013 2018 4 bird Anser Goose 2011 2011 1 bird Ardea cinerea Grey Heron 2013 2013 1 bird Aythya fuligula Tufted Duck 2013 2014 1 bird Buteo buteo Buzzard 2013 2014 2 bird Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch 2011 2014 5 bird Chloris chloris Greenfinch 2011 2014 6 bird Chroicocephalus ridibundus Black-headed Gull 2014 2014 1 bird Coloeus monedula Jackdaw 2011 2013 2 bird Columba livia Feral Pigeon 2014 2014 1 bird Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 2011 2018 8 bird Corvus corax Raven 2020 2020 1 bird Corvus corone Carrion Crow 2011 2014 5 bird Curruca communis Whitethroat 2011 2014 4 bird Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit 2011 2014 6 bird Cygnus olor Mute Swan 2013 2014 4 bird Delichon urbicum House Martin 2011 2011 1 bird Emberiza schoeniclus Reed Bunting 2013 2014 2 bird Erithacus rubecula Robin 2011 2014 7 bird Falco peregrinus Peregrine 2013 2013 1 bird Falco tinnunculus Kestrel 2010 2020 3 bird Fringilla coelebs Chaffinch 2011 2014 7 bird Gallinula chloropus Moorhen 2013
    [Show full text]
  • Water Beetles
    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Conservation of Orophilous Moths at the Southern Boundary of Their Range (Lepidoptera: Macroheterocera)
    Eur. J. Entomol. 106: 231–239, 2009 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1447 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) On top of a Mediterranean Massif: Climate change and conservation of orophilous moths at the southern boundary of their range (Lepidoptera: Macroheterocera) STEFANO SCALERCIO CRA Centro di Ricerca per l’Olivicoltura e l’Industria Olearia, Contrada Li Rocchi-Vermicelli, I-87036 Rende, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Biogeographic relict, extinction risk, global warming, species richness, sub-alpine prairies Abstract. During the last few decades the tree line has shifted upward on Mediterranean mountains. This has resulted in a decrease in the area of the sub-alpine prairie habitat and an increase in the threat to strictly orophilous moths that occur there. This also occurred on the Pollino Massif due to the increase in temperature and decrease in rainfall in Southern Italy. We found that a number of moths present in the alpine prairie at 2000 m appear to be absent from similar habitats at 1500–1700 m. Some of these species are thought to be at the lower latitude margin of their range. Among them, Pareulype berberata and Entephria flavicinctata are esti- mated to be the most threatened because their populations are isolated and seem to be small in size. The tops of these mountains are inhabited by specialized moth communities, which are strikingly different from those at lower altitudes on the same massif further south. The majority of the species recorded in the sub-alpine prairies studied occur most frequently and abundantly in the core area of the Pollino Massif.
    [Show full text]
  • Watsonia 27 (2008), 171-187
    Watsonia 27: 171–187 (2008) PLANT RECORDS 171 Plant Records Records for publication must be submitted to the appropriate Vice-county Recorder (see BSBI Year Book 2008), and not to the Editors. Following publication of the New Atlas of the British & Irish Flora and the Vice-county Census Catalogue, new criteria have been drawn up for the inclusion of records in Plant Records. (See BSBI News no. 95, January 2004 pp. 10 & 11). These are outlined below: First records of all taxa (species, subspecies and hybrids) included in the VCCC, designated as native, archaeophyte, neophyte or casual. First record since 1970 of the taxa above, except in the case of Rubus, Hieracium and Taraxacum. Records demonstrating the rediscovery of all taxa published as extinct in the VCCC or subsequently. Newly reported definite extinctions. Deletions from the VCCC (e.g. through the discovery of errors, the redetermination of specimens etc.) NB – only those errors affecting VCCC entry. New 10km square records for Rare and Scarce plants, defined as those species in the New Atlas mapped in the British Isles in 100 10km squares or fewer. (See BSBI News no. 95, January 2004 pp. 36–43). Records for the subdivisions of vice-counties will not be treated separately; they must therefore be records for the vice-county as a whole. However, records will be accepted for the major islands in v.cc. 102–104, 110 and 113. In the following list, records are arranged in the order given in the List of Vascular Plants of the British Isles and its supplements by D.
    [Show full text]
  • List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007)
    UK Biodiversity Action Plan List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) visit https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/uk-bap/ List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) A list of the UK BAP priority terrestrial invertebrate species, divided by taxonomic group into: Insects, Arachnids, Molluscs and Other invertebrates (Crustaceans, Worms, Cnidaria, Bryozoans, Millipedes, Centipedes), is provided in the tables below. The list was created between 1995 and 1999, and subsequently updated in response to the Species and Habitats Review Report published in 2007. The table also provides details of the species' occurrences in the four UK countries, and describes whether the species was an 'original' species (on the original list created between 1995 and 1999), or was added following the 2007 review. All original species were provided with Species Action Plans (SAPs), species statements, or are included within grouped plans or statements, whereas there are no published plans for the species added in 2007. Scientific names and commonly used synonyms derive from the Nameserver facility of the UK Species Dictionary, which is managed by the Natural History Museum. Insects Scientific name Common Taxon England Scotland Wales Northern Original UK name Ireland BAP species? Acosmetia caliginosa Reddish Buff moth Y N Yes – SAP Acronicta psi Grey Dagger moth Y Y Y Y Acronicta rumicis Knot Grass moth Y Y N Y Adscita statices The Forester moth Y Y Y Y Aeshna isosceles
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Resource Choice of Flower-Visiting Insects in Relation to Pollen Nutritional Quality and Land Use
    Diversity and resource choice of flower-visiting insects in relation to pollen nutritional quality and land use Diversität und Ressourcennutzung Blüten besuchender Insekten in Abhängigkeit von Pollenqualität und Landnutzung Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Technischen Universität Darmstadt zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doctor rerum naturalium genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl. Biologin Christiane Natalie Weiner aus Köln Berichterstatter (1. Referent): Prof. Dr. Nico Blüthgen Mitberichterstatter (2. Referent): Prof. Dr. Andreas Jürgens Tag der Einreichung: 26.02.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.04.2016 Darmstadt 2016 D17 2 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit entsprechend den Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis selbständig und ohne unzulässige Hilfe Dritter angefertigt habe. Sämtliche aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Gedanken sowie sämtliche von Anderen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Daten, Techniken und Materialien sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher keiner anderen Hochschule zu Prüfungszwecken eingereicht. Osterholz-Scharmbeck, den 24.02.2016 3 4 My doctoral thesis is based on the following manuscripts: Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2011): Land-use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialization in flower-visitor networks. Basic and Applied Ecology 12 (4), 292-299. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2014): Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology 95, 466–474. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M , Blüthgen, N. (in prep.): Land-use intensification triggers diversity loss in pollination networks: Regional distinctions between three different German bioregions Weiner, C.N., Hilpert, A., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Chalk Rivers: Nature Conservation and Management
    Chalk rivers: nature conservation and management Item Type monograph Authors Mainstone, C.P. Publisher English Nature and Environment Agency Download date 03/10/2021 21:57:44 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/27247 C halk rivers nature conservation and m anagem ent Chalk rivers nature conservation and management March 1999 C P Mainstone Water Research Centre Produced on behalf of English Nature and the Environment Agency (English Nature contract number FIN/8.16/97-8) Chalk rivers - nature conservation and management Contributors: N T Holmes Alconbury Environmental Consultants - plants P D Armitage Institute of Freshwater Ecology - invertebrates A M Wilson, J H Marchant, K Evans British Trust for Ornithology - birds D Solomon - fish D Westlake - algae 2 Contents Background 8 1. Introduction 9 2. Environmental characteristics of chalk rivers 12 2.1 Characteristic hydrology 12 2.2 Structural development and definition of reference conditions for conservation management 12 2.3 Characteristic water properties 17 3. Characteristic wildlife communities of chalk rivers 20 3.1 Introduction 20 3.2 Higher plants 25 3.3 Algae 35 3.4 Invertebrates 40 3.5 Fish 47 3.6 Birds 53 3.7 Mammals 58 4. Habitat requirements of characteristic wildlife communities 59 4.1 Introduction 59 4.2 Higher plants 59 4.3 Invertebrates 64 4.4 Fish 70 4.5 Birds 73 4.6 Mammals 79 4.7 Summary of the ecological requirements of chalk river communities 80 5. Human activities and their impacts 83 5.1 The inherent vulnerability of chalk rivers 83 5.2 An inventory of activities and their links to ecological impact 83 5.3 Channel modifications and river/floodplain consequences 89 5.4 Low flows 92 5.5 Siltation 95 5.6 Nutrient enrichment 101 5.7 Hindrances to migration 109 5.8 Channel maintenance 109 5.9 Riparian management 115 5.10 Manipulation of fish populations 116 5.11 Bird species of management concern 119 5.12 Decline of the native crayfish 120 5.13 Commercial watercress beds as a habitat 121 5.14 Spread of non-native plant species 121 3 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki 1987 © Figures
    English summary of the report of the Committee for the Conservation of Threatened Ädimals and Plants in Finland Edited by Pertti Rass1 and Rauno Väisänen Helsinki 1987 Threatened animais and plants in Finland English summary of the report of the Committee for the Conservation of Threatened Animais and Plants in Finland Edited by Pertti Rassi and Rauno Väisänen Helsinki 1987 © Figures Markku Bussman Dick Forssman Marja Koistinen Katriina Metsänheimo Maija Mustonen Tuomo Niemelä Antti Rönkä Päivö Somerma Cover: Etiomys quercinus (left) Asptenium adutterinum (above right) Morchetta semilibera (below right) ISSN 0356-9470 ISBN 951-46-7961-X Helsinki 1987. Valtion painatuskeskus Julkaisija KUVAILULEHTI YMPÄRSTöMINISTERIö Julkaisun päivämäärä 22.8.1986 Tekijät (toimielimestä: toimielimen nimi, puheenjohtaja, sihteeri) Julkaisun laji Uhanalaisten eläinten ja kasvien suojelutoimikunta Komiteanmietintö, englanninkielinen yhteenveto Puheenjohtaja Pertti Rassi Toimeksiantaja Sihteerit Aulikki Alanen, Eija Kemppainen, Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö Markku Vickholm, Rauno Väisänen Toimielimen asettamispvm Yhteenvedon toimittajat P. Rassi & R. Väisänen 17.3.1983 Julkaisun nimi (myös ruotsinkielinen) Threatened animals and plants in Finland English summary of the report of the Committee for the Conservation of Threatened Animals and Plants in Finland Julkaisun osat Tiivistelmä Englanninkielinen yhteenveto uhanalaisten eläinten ja kasvien suojelutoimikunnanmietinnöstä (1985:43) osat 1—111. Yhteenvedossa on aluksi katsaus luonnonsuojeluun Suomessa. Siinä
    [Show full text]
  • Антофагия Листоедов (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) © 2010 Г
    ЗООЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ, 2010, том 89, № 5, с. 588–597 УДК 595.768.12 АНТОФАГИЯ ЛИСТОЕДОВ (COLEOPTERA, CHRYSOMELIDAE) © 2010 г. А. О. Беньковский Институт проблем экологии и эволюции РАН, Москва 119071, Россия email: [email protected] Поступила в редакцию 09.12.2008 г. В естественных и лабораторных условиях достоверно установлена антофагия имаго Donacia bicolora, D. brevitarsis, D. obscura, D. thalassina, Plateumaris discolor, Cryptocephalus laetus, C. sericeus, C. solivagus, Labidostomis longimana, Hydrothassa marginella, Phaedon concinnus, Galerucella nymphaeae, Neocrepi dodera femorata, Altica oleracea, Aphthona lutescens, Longitarsus pellucidus и личинок Entomoscelis adonidis, H. marginella, G. nymphaeae, впервые для всех видов, кроме P. discolor, L. longimana и C. sericeus. Изу чены ротовые части имаго листоедовантофагов. Мандибулы и максиллы у рассмотренных видов Donacia и Plateumaris несут специальные приспособления для поедания пыльцы. Обсуждаются во просы экологии видов и эволюции антофагии. Большинство листоедов (Chrysomelidae) на первую очередь Plateumaris discolor (Panzer), пыль взрослой стадии питаются листьями, личинки в цой и другими частями цветка ириса (Iris), камы основном листьями, корнями, детритом или рас ша и осоки (Carex). Монрос (Monrós, 1954) отме тительным соком. Питание листоедов цветками тил поедание пыльцы неопределенного растения (антофагия) рассматривается как редкое явление из семейства сложноцветных (Asteraceae) жуками (Гринфельд, Исси, 1958; Медведев, Рогинская, Aulacoscelis candezei Chapuis. Эрбер (Erber,
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 City of York Biodiversity Action Plan
    CITY OF YORK Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2017 City of York Local Biodiversity Action Plan - Executive Summary What is biodiversity and why is it important? Biodiversity is the variety of all species of plant and animal life on earth, and the places in which they live. Biodiversity has its own intrinsic value but is also provides us with a wide range of essential goods and services such as such as food, fresh water and clean air, natural flood and climate regulation and pollination of crops, but also less obvious services such as benefits to our health and wellbeing and providing a sense of place. We are experiencing global declines in biodiversity, and the goods and services which it provides are consistently undervalued. Efforts to protect and enhance biodiversity need to be significantly increased. The Biodiversity of the City of York The City of York area is a special place not only for its history, buildings and archaeology but also for its wildlife. York Minister is an 800 year old jewel in the historical crown of the city, but we also have our natural gems as well. York supports species and habitats which are of national, regional and local conservation importance including the endangered Tansy Beetle which until 2014 was known only to occur along stretches of the River Ouse around York and Selby; ancient flood meadows of which c.9-10% of the national resource occurs in York; populations of Otters and Water Voles on the River Ouse, River Foss and their tributaries; the country’s most northerly example of extensive lowland heath at Strensall Common; and internationally important populations of wetland birds in the Lower Derwent Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • England Biodiversity Indicators 2020
    4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance England Biodiversity Indicators 2020 This documents supports 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Technical background document Fiona Burns, Tom August, Mark Eaton, David Noble, Gary Powney, Nick Isaac, Daniel Hayhow For further information on 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance visit https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/england-biodiversity-indicators 1 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Indicator 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Technical background document, 2020 NB this paper should be read together with 4b Status of UK Priority Species; distribution which presents a companion statistic based on time series on frequency of occurrence (distribution) of priority species. 1. Introduction The adjustments to the UK biodiversity indicators set as a result of the adoption of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity (including the Aichi Targets) at the 10th Conference of Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity mean there is a need to report progress against Aichi Target 12: Target 12: By 2020 the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation status, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained. Previously, the UK biodiversity indicator for threatened species used lead partner status assessments on the status of priority species from 3-yearly UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) reporting rounds. As a result of the devolution of biodiversity strategies to the UK's 4 nations, there is no longer reporting at the UK level of the status of species previously listed by the BAP process. This paper presents a robust indicator of the status of threatened species in the UK, with species identified as conservation priorities being taken as a proxy for threatened species.
    [Show full text]