27Th Annual MLK Results

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

27Th Annual MLK Results 27TH ANNUAL MLK DAY TOURNAMENT RESULTS Page 1 of 12 LOWER PRIMARY SECTION 27TH ANNUAL MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY TOURNAMENT -- Lower Primary Standings, Page 1 Place Name/Team Rate Score MMed Solk Cum CumOp 1 Fei Alex (2,HICKORY GROVE ELEMENTARY, DUNLAP) 724 5.0 14.5 15.5 15.0 47.5 2 Tang, Bruce R (3,NGS) 702 5.0 13.5 15.5 15.0 51.5 3 Saravanan Pugazhendhi (1,BENJAMIN ELEMENTARY, BLOOMINGTON)806 4.0 15.0 17.0 14.0 54.0 4 Matejka Cole (7,THOMAS METCALF, NORMAL) 515 4.0 13.5 15.5 12.0 50.0 5 Thome Addy (6,THOMAS METCALF, NORMAL) 529 4.0 13.0 14.5 13.0 47.0 For Unrated 1 Ziegler Samuel (68,EPIPHANY, NORMAL) nnnn 3.5 13.5 16.0 11.0 45.0 2 Hafeez Ismail (47,COLENE HOOSE, NORMAL) nnnn 3.0 12.0 13.0 9.0 40.0 For Ratings Under 500 1 Wang Joshua (8,HICKORY GROVE ELEMENTARY, DUNLAP) 455 4.0 12.5 14.0 11.0 41.0 2 Hunter Matthew (38,EPIPHANY, NORMAL) 103 4.0 11.5 12.5 12.0 40.0 For Ratings Under 400 1 Ash Keaton (25,THOMAS METCALF, NORMAL) 125 3.5 16.0 18.5 11.0 54.5 2 McCaleB Christopher (37,HUDSN) 107 3.5 15.0 17.5 11.0 50.0 For Ratings Under 300 1 Manness Will (31,EPIPHANY, NORMAL) 112 3.5 12.0 14.5 10.0 44.5 2 Dowling Tyler (18,PRNNO) 202 3.5 11.5 12.5 9.0 42.5 For Ratings Under 200 1 Kakhandki Manini (19,STEVENSON, BLOOMINGTON) 174 3.0 12.5 14.0 10.0 41.5 2 Clark Summer (30,EPIPHANY, NORMAL) 112 3.0 11.0 13.0 8.5 40.5 27TH ANNUAL MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY TOURNAMENT -- Lower PrimaryTeam Standings, Page 1 Plc Code Name (Players:Top 4 used) Score Solk Cum CumOp SBx2 1 MTCNO THOMAS METCALF, NORMAL (17) 14.5 63.0 46.0 199.5 78.5 Matejka Cole (4.0,515) Thome Addy (4.0,529) Ash Keaton (3.5,125) Wille Max (3.0,454) Sreenkanth Arun (3.0,114) Wille Cecilia (3.0,125) 2 EPHNO EPIPHANY, NORMAL (6) 14.5 57.0 43.5 175.0 70.5 Hunter Matthew (4.0,103) Ziegler Samuel (3.5,nnnn) Manness Will (3.5,112) Hunter John Paul (3.5,413) 3 HCKDU HICKORY GROVE ELEMENTARY, DUNLA (3) 12.5 41.5 35.0 131.5 66.5 Fei Alex (5.0,724) Wang Joshua (4.0,455) Chen Ethan (3.5,449) 4 GRVNO GROVE ELEMENTARY, NORMAL (8) 11.5 54.5 37.5 160.0 50.0 Daniels Alexander (3.5,562) Hickman Bryce (3.0,280) Pyle Wade (2.5,nnnn) Jones,Christopher Ryan (2.5,nnnn) Gangireddy Sanjan (2.5,276) 5 CLNNO COLENE HOOSE, NORMAL (6) 11.0 57.0 39.0 175.0 50.5 Parent Seth (3.0,649) Hafeez Ismail (3.0,nnnn) Lockenvitz Vincent (2.5,nnnn) Page 1 27TH ANNUAL MLK DAY TOURNAMENT RESULTS Page 2 of 12 Venkatesh Anirudh (2.5,242) 6 PRNNO PRAIRIELAND (6) 9.5 50.5 31.0 153.5 39.0 7 GLNNO GLENN ELEMENTARY, NORMAL (7) 8.5 46.5 26.5 145.5 30.5 8 BNJBL BENJAMIN ELEMENTARY, BLOOMINGTO (3) 8.5 39.5 26.0 119.0 38.0 9 HUDSN HUDSON (3) 7.0 39.5 22.5 113.5 33.0 10 NPTBL NORTHPOINT (3) 7.0 31.5 22.5 93.5 18.0 11 STVBL STEVENSON, BLOOMINGTON (2) 5.5 27.0 19.5 80.5 23.5 12 NGS NEXT GENERATION SCHOOL (1) 5.0 15.5 15.0 51.5 31.0 13 BRH BRIGHT HORIZONS (1) 3.0 11.0 8.0 32.5 9.0 14 SHRBL SHERIDAN (1) 2.0 9.5 4.5 28.5 5.0 15 LNCWA LINCOLN WASHINGTON (1) 1.5 11.5 5.0 33.0 5.5 Players:LP Page 1 No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 1 Fei Alex HCKDU 1 724 5.0 W65 W18 W10 W5 W3 2 Tang, Bruce R NGS 1 702 5.0 W49 W12 W8 W11 W16 3 Saravanan Pugazhendhi BNJBL 1 806 4.0 W44 W17 W4 W16 L1 4 Matejka Cole MTCNO 1 515 4.0 W43 W19 L3 W9 W20 5 Thome Addy MTCNO 1 529 4.0 W59 W28 W27 L1 W21 6 Wang Joshua HCKDU 1 455 4.0 W24 L8 W57 W22 W25 7 Hunter Matthew EPHNO 1 103 4.0 W62 W36 L9 W35 W17 8 Ash Keaton MTCNO 1 125 3.5 W15 W6 L2 D10 W38 9 McCaleB Christopher HUDSN 0 107 3.5 W14 D13 W7 L4 W31 10 Ziegler Samuel EPHNO 1 3.5 W41 W37 L1 D8 W28 11 Daniels Alexander GRVNO 0 562 3.5 W66 W34 W29 L2 D12 12 Hunter John Paul EPHNO 0 413 3.5 W60 L2 W51 W45 D11 13 Manness Will EPHNO 1 112 3.5 W36 D9 L17 W23 W27 14 Dowling Tyler PRNNO 1 202 3.5 L9 W26 W62 D27 W32 15 Chen Ethan HCKDU 1 449 3.5 L8 W47 W54 D32 W19 16 Parent Seth CLNNO 1 649 3.0 W37 W21 W35 L3 L2 17 Wille Max MTCNO 1 454 3.0 W56 L3 W13 W47 L7 18 Hickman Bryce GRVNO 1 280 3.0 W23 L1 L20 W50 W47 19 Kakhandki Manini STVBL 1 174 3.0 W52 L4 W26 W42 L15 20 Hafeez Ismail CLNNO 1 3.0 L29 W67 W18 W34 L4 21 Goswami, Shrutodhe GLNNO 0 233 3.0 W48 L16 W43 W29 L5 22 Clark Summer EPHNO 1 112 3.0 D33 D31 W46 L6 W45 23 Sreenkanth Arun MTCNO 1 114 3.0 L18 W48 W30 L13 W42 24 Wille Cecilia MTCNO 0 125 3.0 L6 W30 L42 W63 W43 25 Wieduwilt Makayla NPTBL 1 3.0 D55 D46 W56 W33 L6 26 VINOTHASHA MAHASHVIN BRH 0 3.0 W64 L14 L19 W55 W51 27 Lockenvitz Vincent CLNNO 1 2.5 W50 W59 L5 D14 L13 28 Pacetti Owen PRNNO 1 210 2.5 W31 L5 W55 D38 L10 29 Golliday Shawn STVBL 0 2.5 W20 W66 L11 L21 D36 30 Pyle Wade GRVNO 0 2.5 W39 L24 L23 W44 D34 31 Fung Raine MTCNO 1 107 2.5 L28 D22 W61 W39 L9 32 Jones,Christopher Ryan GRVNO 0 2.5 W67 D33 D45 D15 L14 33 Venkatesh Anirudh CLNNO 1 242 2.5 D22 D32 W53 L25 D35 34 Sathish Rudhran BNJBL 1 214 2.5 W68 L11 W49 L20 D30 35 Rolfes Aidan HUDSN 1 2.5 W58 W65 L16 L7 D33 36 Gangireddy Sanjan GRVNO 1 276 2.5 L13 L7 W68 W66 D29 37 Boester Chase MTCNO 1 140 2.5 L16 L10 D48 W67 W54 38 Stackhouse, Benjamin GLNNO 1 2.5 D53 D57 W44 D28 L8 39 Clark Mason EPHNO 0 2.5 L30 D63 W58 L31 W52 40 Miller Max MTCNO 1 2.5 L42 L43 W65 D52 W53 41 Miller Will MTCNO 0 2.5 L10 D52 D63 D54 W56 42 Gonzalez Diego CLNNO 1 2.0 W40 L44 W24 L19 L23 43 Ramasetti Sujith CLNNO 1 2.0 L4 W40 L21 W57 L24 44 Weissinger Philip MTCNO 0 153 2.0 L3 W42 L38 L30 W63 45 Pollett Brady PRNNO 1 2.0 W63 D60 D32 L12 L22 46 Swope Frank MTCNO 0 2.0 D54 D25 L22 D53 D49 47 Patel Anand NPTBL 1 103 2.0 -B- L15 W60 L17 L18 Page 2 27TH ANNUAL MLK DAY TOURNAMENT RESULTS Page 3 of 12 48 Bhamidipati Nikhit BNJBL 1 110 2.0 L21 L23 D37 D64 W62 49 Idate Ameya GRVNO 1 2.0 L2 W64 L34 D56 D46 50 Morgan, Isla SHRBL 0 2.0 L27 D58 D52 L18 W64 51 Hill Elena NPTBL 1 107 2.0 -H- D53 L12 W62 L26 52 Levita Marcus PRNNO 1 107 1.5 L19 D41 D50 D40 L39 53 Nallamothu Shreya GRVNO 1 1.5 D38 D51 L33 D46 L40 54 French Cayden PRNNO 1 1.5 D46 D55 L15 D41 L37 55 Lister ElizaBeth MTCNO 0 1.5 D25 D54 L28 L26 D59 56 Horn Jude GLNNO 1 122 1.5 L17 W68 L25 D49 L41 57 Spiezio Owen LNCWA 0 1.5 D61 D38 L6 L43 D60 58 Boester Bryse MTCNO 0 1.5 L35 D50 L39 D59 D61 59 AlBritton Anna GLNNO 0 136 1.5 L5 L27 D64 D58 D55 60 Cade, Banyan MTCNO 0 124 1.5 L12 D45 L47 D61 D57 61 Pendleton Max GRVNO 0 1.5 D57 L62 L31 D60 D58 62 Shah Saanavi GLNNO 0 1.0 L7 W61 L14 L51 L48 63 Bokus Willy GLNNO 0 1.0 L45 D39 D41 L24 L44 64 Bates,Gannon MTCNO 0 1.0 L26 L49 D59 D48 L50 65 Stellpflug Cecil GLNNO 1 150 1.0 L1 L35 L40 D68 D67 66 Rader Augie MTCNO 0 127 1.0 L11 L29 D67 L36 D68 67 Steers Savannah HUDSN 0 1.0 L32 L20 D66 L37 D65 68 Dietz Elisha PRNNO 1 110 1.0 L34 L56 L36 D65 D66 UPPER PRIMARY SECTION 27TH ANNUAL MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY TOURNAMENT -- Upper Primary Standings, Page 1 Place Name/Team Rate Score MMed Solk Cum CumOp 1 McDade Pierce (2,THOMAS METCALF, NORMAL) 954 5.0 15.5 18.5 15.0 56.5 2 Bruha, Nicholas (1,BENJAMIN ELEMENTARY, BLOOMINGTON)1098 5.0 13.0 14.5 15.0 47.5 3 Vincent Spencer (24,HUDSN) 552 4.0 16.0 18.0 13.0 55.0 4 Lee Nathan (3,COLENE HOOSE, NORMAL) 872 4.0 14.0 17.0 12.0 53.5 5 Krishnakumar Niroop (39,BENJAMIN ELEMENTARY, BLOOMINGTON)388 4.0 13.5 16.0 14.0 47.5 For Unrated 1 Sathyamurthy Adithya (90,SUGCR) nnnn 4.0 13.5 14.5 14.0 46.5 2 Gajula Aneesh (80,BENJAMIN ELEMENTARY, BLOOMINGTON)nnnn 3.0 10.0 11.0 10.0 35.0 For Ratings Under 900 1 Vakiti Sreeansh (27,COLENE HOOSE, NORMAL) 525 4.0 13.5 16.0 10.0 50.5 2 Nadkarni Anusha (9,WASHINGTON, BLOOMINGTON, BLOOMIN)707 4.0 13.0 15.0 11.0 47.0 For Ratings Under 800 1 Zheng Peter (7,CRRCH) 752 4.0 11.5 13.5 11.0 43.5 2 Berndt Jace (23,GLENN ELEMENTARY, NORMAL) 571 4.0 11.0 13.0 11.0 44.0 For Ratings Under 700 1 Rader Kale (12,THOMAS METCALF, NORMAL) 640 4.0 11.0 13.0 10.0 41.5 2 Easter TJ (32,DRECH) 480 4.0 11.0 12.5 10.0 42.0 For Ratings Under 600 1 Kumar ABhinav (21,WASHINGTON, BLOOMINGTON, BLOOMIN) 585 4.0 10.0 11.0 11.0 39.0 2 SRIRAMANENI MANDEEP (55,OAK) 255 3.5 11.5 12.0 10.5 37.0 For Ratings Under 500 1 Kopula Nikita (43,NPTBL) 365 3.5 11.0 12.5 11.5 45.0 2 Hill Conlon (58,NPTBL) 228 3.5 11.0 11.0 10.0 34.5 For Ratings Under 400 1 AlBritton James (38,GLENN ELEMENTARY, NORMAL) 392 3.0 13.0 15.0 10.0 46.0 2 Minin ABigail (47,DRECH) 323 3.0 11.0 12.0 8.0 38.0 For Ratings Under 300 1 Witzemann Maxwell (59,PRNNO) 221 3.0 8.5 9.5 7.0 30.0 Page 3 27TH ANNUAL MLK DAY TOURNAMENT RESULTS Page 4 of 12 2 Yang, Dan Z (52,DRECH) 274 3.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 28.5 For Ratings Under 200 1 Tellor Mason (69,HUDSN) 150 2.5 6.5 11.0 7.0 31.0 2 Davis Zac (71,TRI-VALLEY, DOWNS) 133 2.0 11.0 14.5 8.0 38.0 27TH ANNUAL MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY TOURNAMENT -- Upper PrimaryTeam Standings, Page 1 Plc Code Name (Players:Top 4 used) Score Solk Cum CumOp SBx2 1 BNJBL BENJAMIN ELEMENTARY, BLOOMINGTO (10) 15.5 59.5 50.5 186.0 83.5 Bruha, Nicholas (5.0,1098) Krishnakumar Niroop (4.0,388) Fernandes Vervin (3.5,589) Vasudevan Avighnav (3.0,753) Saravanan Kavin (3.0,611) Gajula Aneesh (3.0,nnnn) Hunt Kale (3.0,621) 2 CLNNO COLENE HOOSE, NORMAL (6) 14.5 66.0 42.5 204.0 83.5 Lee Nathan (4.0,872) Vakiti Sreeansh (4.0,525) Burras John (3.5,611) Banerjee Ayush (3.0,571) 3 MTCNO THOMAS METCALF, NORMAL (16) 14.5 58.0 39.0 177.0 78.5 McDade Pierce (5.0,954) Rader Kale (4.0,640) Urquizo Gus (3.0,471) Gold Henry (2.5,393) Mullins Cole (2.5,380) Gold Montgomery (2.5,500) Lister Ben (2.5,307) 4 GLNNO GLENN ELEMENTARY, NORMAL (9) 13.0 63.0 43.0 194.5 71.0 Berndt Jace (4.0,571) Goswami Aatmodhee (3.0,748) Kinikar Shlok (3.0,546) AlBritton James (3.0,392) Stellpflug Asa (3.0,616) 5 NPTBL NPTBL (6) 13.0 51.0 38.5 157.5 53.5 Kopula Nikita (3.5,365) Hill Conlon (3.5,228) Lim HerBert (3.0,689) Wieduwilt Jarrett (3.0,483) 6 DRECH DR.
Recommended publications
  • Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592
    Technical Data Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592 Topic Page Description 2 Heater Element Selection Procedure 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables 5 Heater Element Selection Tables 6 Additional Resources These documents contain additional information concerning related products from Rockwell Automation. Resource Description Industrial Automation Wiring and Grounding Guidelines, publication 1770-4.1 Provides general guidelines for installing a Rockwell Automation industrial system. Product Certifications website, http://www.ab.com Provides declarations of conformity, certificates, and other certification details. You can view or download publications at http://www.rockwellautomation.com/literature/. To order paper copies of technical documentation, contact your local Allen-Bradley distributor or Rockwell Automation sales representative. For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Heater Element Specifications Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Type J — CLASS 10 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Type WL — CLASS 30 Note: Heater Element Type W/WL does not currently meet the material Type W Heater Elements restrictions related to EU ROHS Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F).
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons: the Reliable Replacement Warhead Program
    Order Code RL32929 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Nuclear Weapons: The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program May 24, 2005 Jonathan Medalia Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Nuclear Weapons: The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program Summary Most current U.S. nuclear warheads were built in the 1980s, and are being retained longer than was planned. Yet warheads deteriorate with age, and must be maintained. The current approach monitors them for signs of aging. When problems are found, a Life Extension Program (LEP) rebuilds components. While some can be made to new specifications, a nuclear test moratorium bars that approach for critical components that would require a nuclear test. Instead, LEP rebuilds them as closely as possible to original specifications. Using this approach, the Secretaries of Defense and Energy have certified stockpile safety and reliability for the past nine years without nuclear testing. In the FY2005 Consolidated Appropriations Act, Congress initiated the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) program by providing $9 million for it. The program will study developing replacement components for existing weapons, trading off features important in the Cold War, such as high yield and low weight, to gain features more valuable now, such as lower cost, elimination of some hazardous materials, greater ease of manufacture, greater ease of certification without nuclear testing, and increased long-term confidence in the stockpile. It would modify components to make these improvements; in contrast, LEP makes changes mainly to maintain existing weapons. Representative David Hobson, RRW’s prime sponsor, views it as part of a comprehensive plan for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Databook, Volume I 3 Stockpile
    3 Stockpile Chapter Three USNuclear Stockpile This section describes the 24 types of warheads cur- enriched uranium (oralloy) as its nuclear fissile material rently in the U.S. nuclear stockpile. As of 1983, the total and is considered volatile and unsafe. As a result, its number of warheads was an estimated 26,000. They are nuclear materials and fuzes are kept separately from the made in a wide variety of configurations with over 50 artillery projectile. The W33 can be used in two differ- different modifications and yields. The smallest war- ent yield configurations and requires the assembly and head is the man-portable nuclear land mine, known as insertion of distinct "pits" (nuclear materials cores) with the "Special Atomic Demolition Munition" (SADM). the amount of materials determining a "low" or '4high'' The SADM weighs only 58.5 pounds and has an explo- yield. sive yield (W54) equivalent to as little as 10 tons of TNT, In contrast, the newest of the nuclear warheads is the The largest yield is found in the 165 ton TITAN I1 mis- W80,5 a thermonuclear warhead built for the long-range sile, which carries a four ton nuclear warhead (W53) Air-Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) and first deployed equal in explosive capability to 9 million tons of TNT, in late 1981. The W80 warhead has a yield equivalent to The nuclear weapons stockpile officially includes 200 kilotons of TNT (more than 20 times greater than the only those nuclear missile reentry vehicles, bombs, artil- W33), weighs about the same as the W33, utilizes the lery projectiles, and atomic demolition munitions that same material (oralloy), and, through improvements in are in "active service."l Active service means those electronics such as fuzing and miniaturization, repre- which are in the custody of the Department of Defense sents close to the limits of technology in building a high and considered "war reserve weapons." Excluded are yield, safe, small warhead.
    [Show full text]
  • High School Championship -- Standings
    2017 TCA South Texas State Scholastic Championships: High School Championship -- Standings # Place Name ID Rtng Post Team Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[M] TBrk[M] TBrk[S] TBrk[R] TBrk[C] 1 1 Priya Niki Trakru 13806686 2013 2033 STSTMAW63 W53 W18 W25 W12 W2 W6 7.0 30.5 24.5 34.5 34 28 2 2-5 Camille Y Kao 14297024 1969 1968 W85 W82 W32 W20 W11 L1 W15 6.0 29 22 32 25.5 26 3 Polo Stein 14275794 1709 1726 SBSBHSW69 W58 D10 W14 W27 D6 W16 6.0 28 22.5 31.5 27.25 24.5 4 Genta Kaieda 14354622 1888 1877 SHSHS W52 W41 L39 W43 W25 W22 W17 6.0 26.5 21.5 30.5 26.5 23 5 Fabian Olivares 13958918 1614 1656 SBSBHSW78 W16 W54 L39 W41 W11 W13 6.0 26.5 21.5 30 26.5 24 6 6-9 Jonathan Huerta 14086076 1748 1757 BRHHECHSW87 W111 W49 W26 W39 D3 L1 5.5 28.5 21.5 30.5 21 26 7 Satya G Holla 14354691 1698 1704 STSATSW72 W91 W33 L11 W26 W20 D8 5.5 27.5 22 30.5 23.25 23.5 8 Ritik Verma 13745958 1927 1903 CCVETERAW126 L44 W73 W30 W10 W36 D7 5.5 27 21.5 28.5 22.25 21.5 9 Jesus Guillen Jr 13762512 1791 1766 BRHHECHSW73 W108 L26 W111 D31 W40 W29 5.5 23.5 19 25.5 19.25 21.5 10 10-24 Nicholas Galindo 14494914 1390 1530 BRPORTERW99 W67 D3 W29 L8 W31 D12 5.0 29 23 32 21 22 11 Glen Ernest Rocha 16122046 1459 1543 HREARLYW65 W56 W84 W7 L2 L5 W44 5.0 29 23 32 20 23 12 Jorge Hernandez 14281624 1611 1617 SHSHS W51 W68 W44 W40 L1 D19 D10 5.0 29 22 32.5 20.5 23.5 13 Michael D Thomas 14793323 1783 1750 SBVMA W75 L43 W87 W42 W32 W28 L5 5.0 26.5 20.5 29.5 19.5 21 14 Jose Castillo Jr 14085711 1493 1504 BRHHECHSD103 W64 W35 L3 D30 W43 W40 5.0 26.5 20.5 29 19.5 19 15 Luis Ferna
    [Show full text]
  • F. Bertinelli, Presentation 01-Sep-06
    TCC, 1 September 2006 AT-CRI Progress and Outlook for Interconnections F. Bertinelli / AT-CRI (10 minutes) (on behalf of IC Team) • recent “news” since MARIC 2nd August • restart sector 4-5 • sector 7-8 1 SomeSome recentrecent newsnews…… AT-CRI Organisational: • internal AT reorganisation, IC project consolidation • already reinforcement of QA (D. Tommasini/MAS, R. Lopez/CRI) • F523: 4th full team contractually implemented, effective starting week 39/06 • Workflow: developed detailed workflow of activities, including: • pre-inspection and reflectometry • VAC and MEL tests (with recently introduced extended tests MPAQ and MHVQN) • ACR instrumentation • Planning: developed detailed planning, by activities, slots and weeks, extending to closure of W bellows and sector VAC testing TCC – September 2006 – F. Bertinelli 2 RestartRestart sectorsector 44--55 AT-CRI • IC work restarted this week 35/06 • IC work now in 4-5, continuing to 3-4 • detailed planning set up (activities, slots, weeks) for 4-5; 3-4 will follow • 2 full teams (at the moment BR, US, TIG: V, E, X, C’) • until week 39/06 will work Monday to Thursday, then extend to Saturday • 3rd large team starting week 39 • “forfait” (“lump sum”) invoicing • expected average productivity: 8 activities / week-team (but prepare work up to 10 - 12) • first partial results from week 35/06: • V1/V2 & E: 19 •BR: 16 •US: 11 • X: 12, C’: 21 TCC – September 2006 – F. Bertinelli 3 WorkflowWorkflow ICIC AT-CRI from P. Fessia TCC – September 2006 – F. Bertinelli 4 SectorSector 44--5:5: detaileddetailed planningplanning AT-CRI Planning sector 4-5 version 0.2 P.
    [Show full text]
  • Likely to Be Funded Transportation System
    Table 2: Likely to be Funded Transportation System Project # Project Description Project Extent Project Elements Priority Further Study Identify and evaluate circulation options to reduce motor OR 213/Beavercreek Road Refinement OR 213 from Redland Road to Molalla D0 vehicle congestion along the corridor. Explore alternative Short-term Plan Avenue mobility targets. Identify and evaluate circulation options to reduce motor I-205 at the OR 99E and OR 213 Ramp vehicle congestion at the interchanges. Explore alternative D00 I-205 Refinement Plan Short-term Terminals mobility targets, and consider impacts related to a potential MMA Designation for the Oregon City Regional Center. Driving Solutions (Intersection and Street Management- see Figure 16) Molalla Avenue from Washington Street to Molalla Avenue/ Beavercreek Road Deploy adaptive signal timing that adjusts signal timings to D1 Gaffney Lane; Beavercreek Road from Molalla Short-term Adaptive Signal Timing match real-time traffic conditions. Avenue to Maple Lane Road Option 1: Convert 14th Street to one-way eastbound between McLoughlin Boulevard and John Adams Street: • Convert the Main Street/14th Street intersection to all-way stop control (per project D13). • From McLoughlin Boulevard to Main Street, 14th Street would be restriped to include two 12-foot eastbound travel lanes, a six-foot eastbound bike lane, a six-foot westbound contra-flow bike lane, and an eight-foot landscaping buffer on the north side • From Main Street to Washington Street, 14th Street would be restriped to include
    [Show full text]
  • Weightlifting | World Masters Games 2021 Kansai
    Weightlifting Sport Overview In weightlifting, competitors lift barbells above their head with both hands, and the one who succeeds in lifting the heaviest barbell wins. Competitors are categorized into different divisions according to their body weight and compete with others in the same division. The World Masters Games 2021 Kansai will feature two weightlifting events: the snatch, which involves gripping a barbell with both hands and lifting it above the head in one move; and the the head in the next move (jerk). The competitor with the highest combined score of both events wins. Event 55kg :M35, M40, M45, M50, M55, M60, M65, M70, M75, M80 61kg :M35, M40, M45, M50, M55, M60, M65, M70, M75, M80 67kg :M35, M40, M45, M50, M55, M60, M65, M70, M75, M80 73kg :M35, M40, M45, M50, M55, M60, M65, M70, M75, M80 81kg :M35, M40, M45, M50, M55, M60, M65, M70, M75, M80 89kg :M35, M40, M45, M50, M55, M60, M65, M70, M75, M80 96kg :M35, M40, M45, M50, M55, M60, M65, M70, M75, M80 102kg :M35, M40, M45, M50, M55, M60, M65, M70, M75, M80 109kg :M35, M40, M45, M50, M55, M60, M65, M70, M75, M80 +109kg :M35, M40, M45, M50, M55, M60, M65, M70, M75, M80 45kg :W35, W40, W45, W50, W55, W60, W65, W70 49kg :W35, W40, W45, W50, W55, W60, W65, W70 55kg :W35, W40, W45, W50, W55, W60, W65, W70 59kg :W35, W40, W45, W50, W55, W60, W65, W70 64kg :W35, W40, W45, W50, W55, W60, W65, W70 71kg :W35, W40, W45, W50, W55, W60, W65, W70 76kg :W35, W40, W45, W50, W55, W60, W65, W70 81kg :W35, W40, W45, W50, W55, W60, W65, W70 87kg :W35, W40, W45, W50, W55, W60, W65, W70 +87kg :W35, W40, W45, W50, W55, W60, W65, W70 Eligibility (1) Athletes must have achieved the qualifying standard for their age group and bodyweight category in an official event.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Volume Index, 1869 - 1906
    November 14, 2004 WATER VOLUME INDEX, 1869 - 1906 Name Date Entry Number Name Date Entry Number A B Accounting: Baldwin Creek See: nd W122 Receipts and Expenses Baldwin, Frederick Douglass, Supervisor Agreements 1900 W85 Branciforte 1901 W101 1877 W38-W42 Baldwin, Levi Karner Agreements, Water 1881 W63 Branciforte Ball-cocks 1877 W9-W11,W28-W32,W35-W37,W43- See: W45,W89-W91 Water Valves 1900 W82-W83 Bank of Santa Cruz County 1901 W92,W95,W98-W100 1882 W60 1902 W103-W107,W109-W115 Banks 1904 W117-W118 See: Laguna Bank of Santa Cruz County 1881 W68-W70 Santa Cruz Bank of Savings & Loan Santa Cruz Baptist Churches 1882 W58-W59 See: 1900 W85 Twin Lakes Baptist Assembly 1901 W94,W101 Barns 1902 W102 Branciforte 1904 W116 1877 W40 1906 W119-W121 1901 W98 Soquel Bath Tubs 1901 W96-W97 See: See also: Home Furnishings Water Rights Bay Street Agriculture Santa Cruz See: nd W77,W79 Farms and Agriculture 1888 W13-W14,W19 Alfalfa Ben Lomond Winery See: 1901 W99 Hay 1904 W117 Allardt, George F. Bennett, E.H. [Reverend] 1888 W20 1906 W119 Almstead, Fanny A. [aka Mrs. Leonard T. Berries [Crop] Almstead], Grantor Branciforte 1881 W1-W4,W46-W51 1901 W92 1882 W73-W74 Santa Cruz Almstead, Leonard T. 1900 W81 1881 W62-W63,W68-W69 1906 W121 Almstead, Leonard T., Grantor Bias, William Henry, Clerk 1881 W1-W4,W46-51 1888 W57 1882 W73-74 Blackberries Anthony, Elihu, Grantee See: 1869 W75 Berries Anthony, George Blackburn Dam 1877 W12,W33 1877 W29 Anthony’s Farm Blackburn Gulch 1877 W12,W33 1895 W87 Aqueducts Blackburn Gulch Road See: Branciforte Dams and Flumes 1900 W82 Arana Gulch 1901 W99 1902 W103 1904 W117 Arroyo de la Villa Blaine Street 1869 W75 Santa Cruz 1906 W121 Index: Water Volume F.A.
    [Show full text]
  • AAMVA Code Dictionary (ACD) Manual
    AAMVA Code Dictionary (ACD) Manual Release 5.01.0 February August 2013 (Effective September 1, 2013) 4301 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 400 Arlington, VA 22203 (703) 522-1300 Fax (703) 522-1553 This document was produced by AAMVA. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or information storage or retrieval systems, for any purpose other than the intended use by AAMVA, without the express written permission of AAMVA. © 2013 AAMVA All rights reserved. i Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE ACD (RELEASE 5.1.0) MANUAL .............................................................. 1 1.2 HISTORY OF THE ACD CODE SET ................................................................................................................. 4 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE ACD CODES AND QUALIFYING INFORMATION......................................... 10 2.1 ACD CONVICTION AND WITHDRAWAL CODES ..................................................................................... 10 2.2 CONVICTION OFFENSE DETAIL CODE ..................................................................................................... 10 2.3 WITHDRAWAL TYPE ACD DETAIL COMPOSITE FIELD ......................................................................... 12 2.4 CMV, HAZMAT, AND CDL HOLDER INDICATORS .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LLNL 65 Th Anniversary Book, 2017
    Scientific Editor Paul Chrzanowski Production Editor Arnie Heller Pamela MacGregor (first edition) Graphic Designer George Kitrinos Proofreader Caryn Meissner About the Cover Since its inception in 1952, the Laboratory has transformed from a deactivated U.S. Naval Air Station to a campus-like setting (top) with outstanding research facilities through U.S. government investments in our important missions and the efforts of generations of exceptional people dedicated to national service. This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, About the Laboratory nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) was founded in 1952 to enhance process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to the security of the United States by advancing nuclear weapons science and any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise technology and ensuring a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent. With does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States a talented and dedicated workforce and world-class research capabilities, the government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed Laboratory strengthens national security with a tradition of science and technology herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Surety
    UNCLASSIFIED Document No: DP-20.1/ 9-21·89 Document Consists of 72 Pages Cy No . ....L, of ..5_ Cys. Series B SEPTEMBER1~ Joint Report by the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of Energy :. Nuclear Weapons Surety Annual Report to the President(u.) 1988 NOT FOR PUBLIC DISSEMINATION This document contains information that may be subject to the provisions of Section 148 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 USC 2158). Review prior to release is required. CLASSIFIED BY: CG-W-5, Jan 84 ,,.. ·".( ·-y (" • . ·;L'f.- ,- .\,!. .Ji. -~ .... : UNCLASSIFIED F { "THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK." .It - UNCLASSIFIED SEPTEMBER 1989 Joint Report by the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Weapons S~rety Annual Report to the President 1988 Prepared by: The Associate Director for Weapons Program Safety Defense Programs Department of Energy U CLASSIFIED l "THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK." .. SSIFIED JOINT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE/DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS SURETY, 1988 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the request of the President, the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Energy (DOE) report annually on the status of nuclear weapons surety. · This report responds to guidance in National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 309 and summarizes surety progress made during 1988 in the areas of: nuclear weapons safety, security, use control; personnel reliability and assurance programs; emergency preparedness and response; and, inspection and evaluation programs. Budget constraints are also discussed. As part of its preparation, this report was reviewed by the Nuclear Weapons Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Department of Education
    FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Implementation Date: DOE INFORMATION DATA BASE REQUIREMENTS Fiscal Year 1992-93 VOLUME I: AUTOMATED STUDENT INFORMATION SYSTEM July 1, 1992 AUTOMATED STUDENT DATA ELEMENTS APPENDIX B ATTENDANCE RECORDKEEPING REQUIRED CODES FOR ADULT STUDENTS ENTRY: ADULT STUDENTS W39 - Any adult student who left the class/program EA1 - The original entry of an adult student into this because of the time the class/program is scheduled. class. W40 - Any adult student who left the class/program REENTRY: ADULT STUDENTS because of other known reasons. RA1 - Reentry of an adult student into the same W41 - Any adult student who left the class/program class after withdrawal from that class for any because of unknown reasons. reason. W42 - Any adult student who was expelled from school. WITHDRAWALS: ADULT STUDENTS W43 - Any adult student who graduated from school W28 - Any adult student who left the postsecondary with a standard diploma. adult job preparatory program as a program completer. W44 - Any adult student who left school with a certificate of completion. W29 - Any adult student who withdraws from a class but remains enrolled in another class in the W45 - Any adult student who left school with a State of program. Florida diploma (GED). W30 - Any adult student who left the class/program W46 - Any adult student who left the class/program to take a job, previously unemployed. because of the location where the courses met. W31 - Any adult student who left the class/program W47 - Any adult student who is procedurally withdrawn to take a better job, previously employed. at the end of the term or school year who will continue in the class/program the next term or school year.
    [Show full text]