DOCSLIB.ORG

CPS North Playoffs March 23, 2019 Whitney Young High School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CPS North Playoffs March 23, 2019 Whitney Young High School CPS North Playoffs March 23, 2019 Whitney Young High School K-2 Lower Primary Crosstables No. Name Team Pts Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 1 Anderson, Aiden CGBATE 2.5 L44 D21 L4 W6 W27 2 Anderson, Kalen CGBATE 3.0 W40 L30 W19 L4 W33 3 Avila, Marcos CGNEWB 3.5 W19 W34 L41 W48 D15 4 Baker, Toby CGSKIN 3.0 W9 L17 W1 W2 L41 5 Barron, Matthew-RE CGWATE 0.5 --- D11 L46 L34 L16 6 Bronson, Standford CGSKIN 0.5 --- --- D9 L1 -F- 7 Byerly, Nathan CGWATE 2.0 L34 L10 W25 L24 W23 8 Carr, Peter CGBEAU 3.5 D36 W25 W37 L30 W35 9 Chang, Emma CGDECA 1.5 L4 L39 D6 W22 L21 10 Chisholm, Elliott CGEDIS 2.0 L20 W7 L40 D27 D32 11 Chu, Chloe CGSKIN 1.5 L12 D5 L43 D14 D25 12 Contey, Nicola CGBATE 2.0 W11 L41 L39 W26 L31 13 Culotta, Luca CGSKIN 4.0 W45 W29 W28 L47 W38 14 Feinberg, Miles CGWATE 2.0 --- L19 D16 D11 W26 15 Gao, Hannah CGSKIN 4.0 W25 W18 W17 D41 D3 16 Guo, Ivanka CGDECA 1.5 L48 L31 D14 L21 W5 17 Hadj-Chikh, Ronan CGWATE 3.0 W23 W4 L15 W33 L44 18 Hoffman, Alexander CGWATE 2.0 W22 L15 L38 W23 L20 19 Huang, Xi CGSKIN 3.0 L3 W14 L2 W45 W24 20 Kim, Everett CGSKIN 3.0 W10 L44 W45 L37 W18 21 Kong, Hannah CGSKIN 2.5 --- D1 L32 W16 W9 22 Krishnaswamy, Vani CGSKIN 1.5 L18 D26 L36 L9 -B- 23 Leather, Oliver CGSKIN 1.0 L17 L38 -B- L18 L7 24 Lesch, Owen CGBATE 2.0 W46 L37 L33 W7 L19 25 Luz, Azucena CGPRIE 1.5 L15 L8 L7 -B- D11 26 Martin, Sonja CGEDIS 1.0 L35 D22 D27 L12 L14 27 Miske, Fletcher CGSKIN 1.5 L37 D32 D26 D10 L1 28 Moulton, Theo CGWATE 2.0 W42 W33 L13 L39 L48 29 Mukherjee, Deven CGEDIS 3.0 W32 L13 L31 W36 W34 30 Oseledets, Alec CGSKIN 4.5 W38 W2 W44 W8 D47 31 Patkar, Ananya CGSKIN 3.0 L47 W16 W29 L44 W12 32 Pheiffer, Freddy CGWATE 2.0 L29 D27 W21 L43 D10 33 Poby, Amelie CGSKIN 2.0 W43 L28 W24 L17 L2 34 Rasavongxay, Aliana CGSKIN 2.0 W7 L3 L35 W5 L29 35 Reiger, Calvin CGWATE 2.5 W26 L47 W34 D40 L8 36 Rodriguez, Jocilyn CGBATE 2.5 D8 L48 W22 L29 W46 37 Rosario, Anthony CGEDIS 3.0 W27 W24 L8 W20 L39 38 Safranski Urban, Anders CGEDIS 3.0 L30 W23 W18 W46 L13 39 Schwager, Charlie CGSKIN 4.0 L41 W9 W12 W28 W37 40 Shin, Liam CGSKIN 3.0 L2 -B- W10 D35 D43 41 Skoczylas, Alex CGBEAU 4.5 W39 W12 W3 D15 W4 42 Stamper, Bronson CGSKIN 0.0 L28 -F- --- --- --- 43 Suh, Yeju CGDECA 3.0 L33 D46 W11 W32 D40 44 Tallacksen, Dustin CGBEAU 4.0 W1 W20 L30 W31 W17 45 Vadlamani, Sriya CGDECA 2.0 L13 -X- L20 L19 -X- 46 Wagner, Emily CGSKIN 1.5 L24 D43 W5 L38 L36 47 Walker, Johnnie CGBEAU 4.5 W31 W35 W48 W13 D30 48 Wang, Owen CGSKIN 3.0 W16 W36 L47 L3 W28 K-4 Upper Primary Crosstables No. Name Team Pts Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 1 Ahmed, Salahuddin CGDECA 2.0 W10 L66 L20 L42 W8 2 Ahmed, Talha CGDECA 3.0 W22 W20 L66 W14 L40 3 Arellano, Jorge CGBATE 3.0 W48 L45 W16 L62 W17 4 Augustyn, David CGDECA 4.0 W9 W14 W13 L37 W69 5 Barron, Richard-RE CGWATE 1.0 --- W18 L69 L10 L23 6 Bjurstrom, Maxwell CGWATE 1.0 L36 L16 W55 --- --- 7 Bohnsack, Ross CGEDIS 1.0 L45 L17 -B- L61 L9 8 Castanon, Miguel CGPALM 1.0 L20 L32 L18 -B- L1 9 Cervantes, Agustin CGPRIE 2.0 L4 W30 L17 L41 W7 10 Chapman, Khloe CGNEWB 3.0 L1 L70 W60 W5 W45 11 Chennareddy, Siri CGDECA 4.0 W67 L40 W46 W15 W31 12 Chicione, Watson CGWATE 3.0 W49 W28 L68 W45 L44 13 Corcoran, Aedan CGBEAU 3.0 W34 W27 L4 L31 W16 14 Datta, Shaan CGSKIN 2.0 W52 L4 W27 L2 L41 15 Dreghorn, Finn CGEDIS 3.0 W42 L65 W26 L11 W29 16 Ellevog, Ashley CGNEWB 2.0 L62 W6 L3 W18 L13 17 Ellevog, Jacob CGNEWB 2.0 L69 W7 W9 L25 L3 18 Felix, Daniel CGPRIE 2.0 L19 L5 W8 L16 W55 19 Gonzales, Troy CGDECA 4.0 W18 W58 L40 W35 W66 20 Hadzi-Pecov, Stefan CGEDIS 2.0 W8 L2 W1 L70 L47 21 Hernandez, Angelo CGNOBL 1.5 --- W42 L29 D63 L32 22 Hoffman, Natalia CGWATE 2.5 L2 D56 W52 W59 L24 23 Jara Perez, Ashley CGBATE 2.0 L24 L34 W39 L49 W5 24 Judge, Silas CGDECA 4.0 W23 W63 W35 L40 W22 25 Kelly, Eamonn CGSKIN 3.0 W64 W50 L44 W17 L62 26 Kong, Joanna CGSKIN 2.5 --- W67 L15 D46 W63 27 Lee, Isaiah CGEDIS 2.0 W55 L13 L14 W32 L49 28 Leonard, Jack CGBATE 2.0 W51 L12 L64 W58 L35 29 Lesch, Isaac CGBATE 2.0 W60 L44 W21 L69 L15 30 Levine, Asa CGEDIS 1.0 L50 L9 L42 W48 L52 31 Liu, Grant CGSKIN 3.0 W57 L62 W63 W13 L11 32 Llamas, Nathan CGPRIE 2.5 D59 W8 L36 L27 W21 33 Macmallian, Max CGNEWB 4.0 L44 W39 W49 W36 W70 34 Martin, Vonn CGDECA 4.0 L13 W23 W51 W54 W50 35 Mathew, Anjali CGSKIN 3.0 W43 W36 L24 L19 W28 36 Mccloskey, Josephine CGBATE 3.0 W6 L35 W32 L33 W54 37 Mccloskey, William CGBATE 5.0 W41 W69 W62 W4 W65 38 Mcgann, Mason CGBEAU 1.0 L68 D48 L56 L55 D39 39 Mora, Dylan Franco CGPALM 0.5 L54 L33 L23 L67 D38 40 Mukesh, Siddarth CGSKIN 5.0 W53 W11 W19 W24 W2 41 Murphy, Jack CGDECA 3.0 L37 W47 L54 W9 W14 42 Murray, Zack CGNEWB 2.0 L15 L21 W30 W1 L64 43 Nabicht, Isabella CGEDIS 0.0 L35 L51 --- --- --- 44 Namuunbayar, Enkhjin CGDECA 4.0 W33 W29 W25 L65 W12 45 Nunez, Adrian CGNOBL 2.0 W7 W3 L65 L12 L10 46 Pomposo, Julian CGPRIE 1.5 L63 W55 L11 D26 L59 47 Puebla, Alejandro CGNOBL 3.0 --- L41 W57 W51 W20 48 Rieger, Lucy CGWATE 0.5 L3 D38 L50 L30 L51 49 Robinson, Keaney CGSKIN 3.0 L12 W61 L33 W23 W27 50 Rodriguez, Alyssa CGBATE 2.5 W30 L25 W48 D56 L34 51 Rubio, Yadira CGPRIE 2.0 L28 W43 L34 L47 W48 52 Saini, Tej CGBEAU 2.0 L14 L64 L22 W57 W30 53 Scott, Casey CGDECA 3.0 L40 W60 W59 W64 L68 54 Sikora, Jace CGBEAU 2.0 W39 L68 W41 L34 L36 55 Smejkal, Zara CGSKIN 1.0 L27 L46 L6 W38 L18 56 Smith, Aubrey CGNEWB 2.0 L66 D22 W38 D50 L61 57 Smith, Knox CGEDIS 1.0 L31 L59 L47 L52 -B- 58 Smith, Leo CGNEWB 1.0 -B- L19 L70 L28 L67 59 Stiles, Mark CGSKIN 2.5 D32 W57 L53 L22 W46 60 Sullivan, Gorman CGWATE 0.0 L29 L53 L10 --- --- 61 Summer, Julian CGDECA 3.0 --- L49 W67 W7 W56 62 Suteu, Robert CGDECA 4.0 W16 W31 L37 W3 W25 63 Vadlamani, Neel CGEDIS 1.5 W46 L24 L31 D21 L26 64 Wilken, Brandon CGEDIS 3.0 L25 W52 W28 L53 W42 65 Xie, Andrew CGSKIN 4.0 W70 W15 W45 W44 L37 66 Xu, Jiaxin CGBELL 3.0 W56 W1 W2 L68 L19 67 Zetina, Gael CGPRIE 2.0 L11 L26 L61 W39 W58 68 Zhang, Cedric CGSKIN 5.0 W38 W54 W12 W66 W53 69 Ziegelman, Max CGSKIN 3.0 W17 L37 W5 W29 L4 70 Zurer, Jonah CGDECA 3.0 L65 W10 W58 W20 L33 K-6 Intermediate Crosstables No. Name Team Pts Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 1 Addington , Aedric CGPEIR 2.0 L35 D63 L57 W16 D70 2 Andino, Robert CGBATE 3.0 W37 W65 L3 W42 L13 3 Anselbach, Charlie CGSKIN 3.0 W52 W30 W2 L41 L14 4 Asiyanbi, Zachary CGSKIN 2.0 W67 L42 W15 L31 L69 5 Baurer, Simon CGSKIN 3.0 L51 W24 L33 W17 W68 6 Berman, Shaina CGSKIN 2.0 L55 W11 L52 W22 L60 7 Bernal, Sebastian CGPEIR 3.0 L43 W8 W30 W29 L40 8 Boywid, Aiden CGDECA 3.0 L42 L7 W70 W37 W20 9 Brown , Amani CGPEIR 2.0 L59 L15 W24 W23 L52 10 Bucur, Radu CGBEAU 4.0 W21 W48 W38 W14 L41 11 Byerly, Jacob CGWATE 0.0 L65 L6 L37 L70 L24 12 Castanon, Marco CGPALM 2.0 L53 L20 L34 W49 W23 13 Chen, David CGEDIS 5.0 W46 W44 W45 W60 W2 14 Cinco, Jenna CGDECA 4.0 W34 -X- W35 L10 W3 15 Claudio, Alexander CGNEWB 2.0 L58 W9 L4 W53 L34 16 Contreras, Sara CGPALM 0.5 L44 L21 L22 L1 D49 17 Curry , Thomas CGPEIR 1.0 -X- L38 L48 L5 L62 18 Deligiannis, Dimtri CGBEAU 5.0 -B- W62 W43 W54 W27 19 Ding, Ethan CGDECA 4.0 W56 L58 W21 W52 W57 20 Ellis, Preston CGSKIN 2.0 L31 W12 L59 W68 L8 21 Fonseca, Joaquin CGNEWB 3.0 L10 W16 L19 W25 W42 22 Frank , Ellis CGPEIR 2.0 L50 L47 W16 L6 W37 23 Gamez, Stella CGWATE 1.0 L69 L46 -B- L9 L12 24 Garcia, Williams CGPRIE 1.0 L54 L5 L9 L26 W11 25 Hernandez, Pedro CGPALM 1.0 --- L52 W49 L21 L28 26 Hoang, Thomas CGPALM 2.0 L27 L66 L36 W24 W63 27 Hong, Sophie CGEDIS 4.0 W26 W55 W58 W39 L18 28 Huang, Grace CGBEAU 2.0 W60 L54 L55 L69 W25 29 Huda, Sinan CGSKIN 2.0 -X- L50 W46 L7 L66 30 Jung, Ethan CGDECA 1.0 W70 L3 L7 L46 L36 31 Kaplan, Avi CGDECA 4.0 W20 L41 W69 W4 W43 32 Klasen, Lia CGPALM 1.5 --- W36 D68 L57 L56 33 Kraus, Kanan CGBEAU 3.0 L39 W34 W5 L40 W48 34 Lehman, Nikolas CGSKIN 3.0 L14 L33 W12 W36 W15 35 Lozada, Niccolo CGSKIN 3.0 W1 W61 L14 W48 L39 36 Luz, Emanuel CGPRIE 2.0 L62 L32 W26 L34 W30 37 Montelongo, Daniel CGSTEM 1.0 L2 L60 W11 L8 L22 38 Moreno, Julian CGSKIN 3.0 W57 W17 L10 L51 W47 39 Namuunbayar, Anujin CGDECA 4.0 W33 W64 W50 L27 W35 40 Nanda, Aditya CGDECA 4.0 --- W70 W65 W33 W7 41 Novikov, Andrey CGBATE 5.0 W66 W31 W51 W3 W10 42 Pérez-Bernal, Sebastian CGEDIS 2.0 W8 W4 L54 L2 L21 43 Paskiewicz, Owen CGSKIN 3.0 W7 W59 L18 W47 L31 44 Patti , Phineas CGPEIR 2.0 W16 L13 L64 W67 L46 45 Ramirez , Santiago CGPEIR 2.0 W63 W68 L13 L59 L65 46 Ramirez, Audrey CGSTEM 3.0 L13 W23 L29 W30 W44 47 Ramirez, Gabriella CGNOBL 2.0 L48 W22 W62 L43 L38 48 Ramirez, Katherine CGSTEM 2.0 W47 L10 W17 L35 L33 49 Rincon, Clemente CGPRIE 0.5 L68 L67 L25 L12 D16 50 Saini, Jeet CGBEAU 3.0 W22 W29 L39 L55 W61 51 Sakaliyski, Christopher CGEDIS 4.0 W5 W69 L41 W38 W55 52 Santana, Jocelyn CGBATE 3.0 L3 W25 W6 L19 W9 53 Scott, Deonce CGSTEM 1.0 W12 -F- --- L15 L67 54 Severns, Rhett CGSKIN 3.0 W24 W28 W42 L18 L59 55 Simpson, Andrew CGDECA 3.0 W6 L27 W28 W50 L51 56 Skoczylas, Adriana CGBEAU 2.5 L19 D57 W63 L64 W32 57 Smith, Gavin CGNEWB 2.5 L38 D56 W1 W32 L19 58 Stiles, Paul CGSKIN 4.0 W15 W19 L27 W66 W64 59 Swan, Josephine CGDECA 4.0 W9 L43 W20 W45 W54 60 Timble, Kayin CGBATE 3.0 L28 W37 W67 L13 W6 61 Tolentino, Jacob CGNEWB 2.0 -B- L35 L66 W63 L50 62 Tran, Anh CGPALM 2.0 W36 L18 L47 L65 W17 63 Valdivia, Gabriel CGSTEM 0.5 L45 D1 L56 L61 L26 64 Valencia, Gabriel CGBATE 3.0 -X- L39 W44 W56 L58 65 Wahtola, Hunter CGNEWB 3.0 W11 L2 L40 W62 W45 66 Warden, Gabriel CGEDIS 3.0 L41 W26 W61 L58 W29 67 Webb, Isaac CGNEWB 2.0 L4 W49 L60 L44 W53 68 Wong, Johnathan CGBEAU 1.5 W49 L45 D32 L20 L5 69 Wong, Nathan CGPEIR 3.0 W23 L51 L31 W28 W4 70 Wright, Georas CGSTEM 1.5 L30 L40 L8 W11 D1 K-8 Junior High Crosstables No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Worksop-Inset.Pdf
    Worksop inset map 258 151 43.3m 3 41.8m 139 74 135 ANSTON AVENUE 64 4 SOUTH VIEW 125 AVENUE HARSTOFT 54 3 LB 214 115 42 PCs 31 22 105 40 Shelter 42.4m 13 Supermarket 36 32 El Sub Sta 22 44.5m 1 12 221 81 246 69 2 103 48.2m 37 57 A N S TO N A V E N U E 54 ED & Ward Bdy 52a B L Y TH G R O V E 45 41 Key 33 45.7m 29 23 CR 2 13 STANLEY STREET STANLEY 35 25 3 234 1a3a 1 11 North Nottinghamshire College Shelter 21 5 21 217 (FE) 12 New Housing (ST18) 33 52 12 43 BLYTH ROAD 53 19 222 JA M E S S TR E E T 215 1 G A TE FO R D R O A D 2 Works CR 220 8 Proposed mixed use (Policy 17) 10 54.3m 14 I Ward Bdy 25 13 SP 6 GP 1a 17 1b 208 Shelter 2 1 Committed Housing 36 3 HOLMEFIELD CLOSE HOLMEFIELD 15 43.0m S H E P H E R D 'S A V E N U E 15 2 13 CR Norbridge Academy 29 196 (Sch) 15 PERCIVAL STREET PERCIVAL 38 New Employment (ST08) 2a 24 2 203 L Twrs W52 13 8 1 3 52.4m 10 186 11 S H E P H E R D 'S A V E N U E 34 Pit 18 Wr Pt 9 Exisiting Employment (ST11) SPs 30 12 174 SP 34a M e rry -g o -ro u n d CR 168 28 Locally important openL Twr space (ST48) W ag o n D ep o t The Chestnuts 50.0m 3 El Sub Sta SP Oak Lodge Playingfield and outdoor sportsSandhole Sidings facility (ST49) TU R N E R R O A D 40.0m 20 1 LB El Sub Sta 185 78 Ward Bdy STREET 18 1b 8 CR 1a 102 183 7 Main Green Corridor (ST41) STANLEY 90 72 MP 0.5 50.6m ED Bdy BANK El Sub Sta BLYTH ROAD Turner Road 18a SUNNY ED Bdy TU R N E R R O A D 64 SP Industrial 51.8m Minor Green Corridor (ST41) Estate 18b 54 Club 47.2m 50 Ward Bdy 48.8m 63 61 53 6 50.9m ED Bdy ED & Ward Bdy Ward & ED 49 SUNNY BANK Bowling
    [Show full text]
  • Web Appendix
    Online Appendix for “Productivity Shocks, Long-Term Contracts and Earnings Dynamics” Neele Balke∗, Thibaut Lamadon† September 25, 2020 W1 Model web appendix........................ W1 W1.1 Properties of equilibrium functions............ W1 W1.2 Existence of equilibrium................. W9 W2 Identification web appendix.................... W23 W2.1 Data............................ W24 W2.2 Identifying the choice probabilities............ W24 W2.3 Identifying the model parameters............ W26 W2.4 Proofs........................... W27 W3 Data web appendix......................... W43 W3.1 Institutional background................. W43 W3.2 Moments description................... W45 W4 Estimation web appendix..................... W46 W4.1 Numerical solution to the model............. W47 W4.2 Simulating moments.................... W48 W4.3 Optimization........................ W48 W4.4 Computing standard errors................ W49 ∗Kenneth C. Griffin Dept. of Economics, University of Chicago, [email protected]. †Kenneth C. Griffin Dept. of Economics, University of Chicago, [email protected], IFAU, IFS and NBER. W1 Model web appendix W1.1 Properties of equilibrium functions In this section, we define the set J of profit functions of the firm and then, taking an arbitrary J ∈ J as given, derive properties of the market tightness, job finding probability, and search and effort policy functions in equilibrium. Definition W1 (Definition of J). Let J be defined as the set of firms’ value functions J : S × V → R such that (J1) For all (x, z) ∈ S and all V1,V2 ∈ V with V1 ≤ V2, the difference J(x, z, V2)− J(x, z, V1) is bounded by −BJ (V2 − V1) and −BJ (V2 − V1) where BJ ≥ BJ > 0 are some constants. (J2) For all (x, z, V ) ∈ S × V, J(x, z, V ) is bounded in [J, J] where J = f(x,z)−u−1 v+c(e)−βv f(x,z)−u−1 v+c(e)−βv 1−β and J = 1−β .
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery World 02/03/2018 TD: Bob Patterson-Sumwalt Participants 155 K12 Participants in Tournaments to Date 17 - 18 1774
    Discovery World 02/03/2018 TD: Bob Patterson-Sumwalt Participants 155 K12 Participants in tournaments to date 17 - 18 1774 No. Name Pts Local Team TBrk1 TBrk2 TBrk3 Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 1 KRAEMER, JOHNATHAN 5.0 1222 PIUSwa 12.0 14.0 15.0 W29 W14 W37 W16 W10 2 CHEN, ALEXANDER 4.5 1354 MEQUON15.5 18.0 14.5 W20 W4 W26 W5 D3 3 NEEB, WILL JR 4.5 1323 GOLDmi 12.5 14.5 14.5 W35 W15 W32 W13 D2 4 NEEB, EMMA 4.0 1153 GOLDmi 14.5 16.5 11.0 W6 L2 W39 W23 W19 5 SURESH, ARJUN 4.0 1155 NORTwa 14.0 16.5 13.0 W11 W25 W23 L2 W14 6 RUPLINGER, AARON 4.0 1222 FRANwe 13.0 14.5 10.0 L4 W18 W45 W22 W17 7 HARWOOD, WILLIAM 4.0 1173 MEQUON12.0 14.5 11.0 W17 L13 W25 W21 W15 8 SCHMIDT, NATHAN 4.0 1123 RIVEmi 12.0 14.5 10.0 L15 W21 W28 W18 W13 9 SHANMUGASUNDARAM, TANYA4.0 1014 NORTme 10.5 12.5 10.0 L13 W27 W38 W32 W16 10 MOLINA, MAXIMUS 3.5 968 UNITmi 14.5 16.0 12.0 W22 D11 W44 W19 L1 11 HANSEN, KEEGAN 3.5 940 GOLDmi 11.5 13.0 8.0 L5 D10 W40 W44 W35 12 PAGEL, CARSON 3.5 921 GOLDmi 10.5 12.0 8.0 L14 D44 W31 W26 W30 13 ORTIZ, DIEGO 3.0 1121 UNITmi 16.5 19.5 12.0 W9 W7 W24 L3 L8 14 MARTINEZ, GUSTAVO 3.0 973 UNITmi 15.5 16.5 10.0 W12 L1 W51 W24 L5 15 ALEXANDER, DELIA 3.0 1008 CARMEN 14.5 15.5 10.0 W8 L3 W50 W33 L7 16 VARELA, JAIRO 3.0 850 UNITmi 14.0 15.0 12.0 W53 W20 W43 L1 L9 17 MORALES, RAFAEL 3.0 948 UNITmi 13.0 15.0 9.0 L7 W28 W27 W43 L6 18 SCHESKE, WILLIAM 3.0 855 GOLDmi 12.0 12.5 9.0 W34 L6 W52 L8 W33 19 SCHOMANN, MADDOX 3.0 800 TEMPsu 11.5 13.5 12.0 W39 W34 W33 L10 L4 20 HARPER, TYRONE 3.0 906 GOLDmi 11.5 13.5 6.0 L2 L16 W41 W34 W32 21 CHAPLIN, CARTER 3.0
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of NEW JERSEY Department of Labor and Workforce Development Division of Wage and Hour Compliance - Public Contracts Section PO Box 389 Trenton, NJ 08625-0389
    STATE OF NEW JERSEY Department of Labor and Workforce Development Division of Wage and Hour Compliance - Public Contracts Section PO Box 389 Trenton, NJ 08625-0389 PREVAILING WAGE RATE DETERMINATION The New Jersey Prevailing Wage Act (N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.25 et seq.) requires that the Department of Labor and Workforce Development establish and enforce a prevailing wage level for workers engaged in public works in order to safeguard their efficiency and general well being and to protect them as well as their employers from the effects of serious and unfair competition. Prevailing wage rates are wage and fringe benefit rates based on the collective bargaining agreements established for a particular craft or trade in the locality in which the public work is performed. In New Jersey, these rates vary by county and by the type of work performed. Applicable prevailing wage rates are those wages and fringe benefits in effect on the date the contract is awarded. All pre-determined rate increases listed at the time the contract is awarded must also be paid, beginning on the dates specified. Rates that have expired will remain in effect until new rates are posted. Prevailing Wage Rate The prevailing wage rate for each craft will list the effective date of the rate and the following information: W = Wage Rate per Hour B = Fringe Benefit Rate per Hour* T = Total Rate per Hour * Fringe benefits are an integral part of the prevailing wage rate. Employers not providing such benefits must pay the fringe benefit amount directly to the employee each payday.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Railroad Corporation
    KOREA RAILROAD CORPORATION Issue of U.S.$ 150,000,000 Floating Rate Notes due 2024 (the “Notes”) Issued pursuant to the U.S.$2,000,000,000 Medium Term Note Program Issue Price: 100% of the Aggregate Nominal Amount Issue Date: November 29, 2019 This investor package includes (a) the offering circular dated August 28, 2018 relating to the U.S.$2,000,000,000 Medium Term Note Program (the “Program”) as supplemented by the pricing supplement dated November 18, 2019 relating to the Notes (the “Offering Circular”), and (b) this document dated November 29, 2019 as the cover page to the Offering Circular (the “Investor Package”). The Notes will be issued by Korea Railroad Corporation (the “Issuer”). Application will be made to the Taipei Exchange (the “TPEx”) for the listing of, and permission to deal in, the Notes by way of debt issues to professional investors as defined under Paragraph 1, Article 2-1 of the Taipei Exchange Rules Governing Management of Foreign Currency Denominated International Bonds of the ROC only and such permission is expected to become effective on or about November 29, 2019. TPEx is not responsible for the contents of this Investor Package and no representation is made by TPEx as to the accuracy or completeness of this Investor Package. TPEx expressly disclaims any and all liabilities for any losses arising from, or as a result of, the reliance on, all or part of the contents of this Investor Package. Admission for listing and trading of the Notes on the TPEx is not to be taken as an indication of the merits of the Issuer or the Notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Installation and User Manual
    Installation and user manual EN CLOSED WOOD FIRES DON’T COMPROMISE. Product Kalfire W Product group Wood burning fireplaces with lifting door Application Open and closed Models Kalfire W45/48F Kalfire W60/51F Kalfire W65/38C Kalfire W66/48S Kalfire W70/33F Kalfire W71/62F Kalfire W80/52T Kalfire W85/40F Kalfire W90/47C Kalfire W90/47S Kalfire W100/61F Kalfire W105/47F Kalfire W105/47T Kalfire W120/38F Version January 2018 Language English 3 4 Preface Congratulations on purchasing your Kalfire W wood burning fireplace. This manual describes the installation, daily use and maintenance of all the fireplaces from the Kalfire W series. Read this manual carefully before installing and using the fireplace. Please complete the proof of guarantee (appendix C) and keep it with the invoice to verify the purchase date. Always keep this manual close to your fireplace An authorised installer will install the Kalfire W fireplace in compliance with the national or local applicable regulations. Check the fireplace for transport damage upon delivery. Report any transport damage to the supplier immediately. The supplier cannot be held responsible for any damage because of faulty installation. In case any problems occur or if you have any questions concerning the operation of your fireplace, please contact your Kalfire dealer. Your dealer is also the person to contact during the duration of the guarantee period. Kalfire BV has installed a telephone helpdesk, to support the technical department of her dealers, to make sure your dealer will be able to advise you in a professional way. All rights reserved. Nothing from this manual may be copied, distributed or translated into other languages, partly or wholly, without prior written permission from Kalfire.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Brandon Doss Assistant State Veterinarian AR Livestock & Poultry
    HATCHERIES, DEALERS, AND INDEPENDENT FLOCKS PARTICIPATING IN THE NATIONAL POULTRY IMPROVMENT PLAN MULTIPLIER MEAT-TYPE CHICKEN BREEDING FLOCKS NPIP. HATCHING PRODUCTS CLASSIFIED ADDITIONAL NO. SUBPART PARTICIPANTS NAME AND ADDRESS EGG U.S. PULLORUM-TYPHOID CLASSIFICATIONS FOR CAPACITY CLEAN WHICH PRODUCTS QUALFIED 71 - Arkansas Dr Brandon Doss Assistant State Veterinarian AR Livestock & Poultry Commission PO Box 8505 Little Rock, AR 72215 Phone: 501-907-2254 Fax:501-907-2259 [email protected] Hatchery Farm/company George's Inc. #1 P.O. Box G Springdale, MGM MSM AI 24 C AR 72764 T CLEAN P/T CLEAN Phone: OK Farms P.O. Box 1119 Ft. Smith, MGM MSM AI 121 C AR 72902 T19 T3 CLEAN P/T CLEAN Phone: Ozark Mountain Poultry farms, LLC 1420 MGM MSM AI 183 C St Louis St Batesville, AR 72503 T CLEAN P/T CLEAN Phone: Peco Foods 1600 White Drive Batesville, MGM MSM AI 108 C AR 72501 T CLEAN P/T CLEAN Phone: Pilgrim's Pride Corp. P.O. Box MG MS AI CLEAN P/T 189 C 811 Nashville, AR 71852 T CLEAN Phone: Simmons Foods Inc. P.O. Box 430 Siloam MGM MSM AI 185 C Springs, AR 72761 5503680 T9 T19 CLEAN P/T CLEAN Phone: Tyson Foods Inc. 1115 South MGM MSM AI 175 C Elmira Russellville, AR 72801 T CLEAN P/T CLEAN Phone: Tyson Foods Inc. P.O. Box 576 Green 221 C Forest, AR 72638 T AI CLEAN P/T CLEAN Phone: Tyson Foods Inc. P.O. Box 219 C 507 Murfreesboro, AR 71842 T AI CLEAN P/T CLEAN Phone: Tyson Foods Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • National Poultry Improvement Plan
    Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. Jius / / d T(o TJz £f\ United States ^«& Department of Agriculture National Poultry _ Animal and _ -}— Plant Health Inspection Improvement Plan Service Veterinary Services 1981 Directory of Participants APHIS 91-42 Handling Waterfowl, February 1 981 Exhibition Poultry, and Game Birds NATIONAL POULTRY IMPROVEMCNT PLAN U.S. J U.S. | Jush [Pullorum-Typhoic 7 S M.Gollisepticum ^ APPROVED m TCLEANj * *! CLEANF npip! ^H^IPB^pV BJ B* The National Poultry Improvement Plan became operative July 1, 1935, and the National Turkey Improvement Plan became operative September 25, 1943, with the approval of the Secretary of Agriculture. On December 3, 1971, the two Plans were combined under one title, "The National Poultry Improvement Plan," with separate provisions applicable to the different types of poultry. The Plan operates under the authority of an appropriation made by Congress to the United States Department of Agriculture to be used in cooperation with the State authorities in the administration of regulations for the improvement of poultry, poultry products, and hatcheries. Authority for the administration of the Plan is now contained in the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944, as amended (7 U.S.C. 429). Provisions of the Plan are changed from time to time to conform with the development of the industry and with new information as it becomes available. These changes are based on recommendations made at the Biennial National Plan Conferences by official delegates representing participating breeders, hatcheries, and flockowners from all cooperating States. Current provisions of the Plan are described in a publication entitled "The National Poultry Improvement Plan and Auxiliary Provisions." The publication is available from Official State Agencies or on request to the National Poultry Improvement Plan, APHIS-VS, Building 265, BARC- East, Beltsville, Maryland 20705.
    [Show full text]
  • Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592
    Technical Data Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592 Topic Page Description 2 Heater Element Selection Procedure 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables 5 Heater Element Selection Tables 6 Additional Resources These documents contain additional information concerning related products from Rockwell Automation. Resource Description Industrial Automation Wiring and Grounding Guidelines, publication 1770-4.1 Provides general guidelines for installing a Rockwell Automation industrial system. Product Certifications website, http://www.ab.com Provides declarations of conformity, certificates, and other certification details. You can view or download publications at http://www.rockwellautomation.com/literature/. To order paper copies of technical documentation, contact your local Allen-Bradley distributor or Rockwell Automation sales representative. For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Heater Element Specifications Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Type J — CLASS 10 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Type WL — CLASS 30 Note: Heater Element Type W/WL does not currently meet the material Type W Heater Elements restrictions related to EU ROHS Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F).
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle July Wine Editable
    august 2021 WINE BY THE GLASS WHITES REDS Flirty & Sparky Gls/Btl Alluring & Spicy Gls/Btl MIONETTO Prosecco (Italy) 7/28 CARICATURE Zinfandel ‘18 (Lodi, CA) *S-G 8/32 VIETTI Moscato d’Asti ‘20 (IT) Half btl 10/20 AMAVI by Pepper Bridge Syrah ‘18 (WA) 14/56 LARCHARGO Reserva Tempranillo ‘12 (SP) 9/36 Sumptously Fruity ALTOS ‘Las Hormigas’ Malbec ‘19 (ARG) 8/32 Ste. CHAPELLE Soft Huckleberry (ID) 5/20 Pinot Noir & Light-bodied Red Dr. LOOSEN Qba Riesling ‘20 (GER) 6/24 MEIOMI ‘19 (CA) 10/40 Refreshing & Satisfying PATTON VALLEY Estate ‘18 (OR) 10/40 LAVENDETTE Rose ‘20 (FR) 8/32 GULP/HABLO TINTO Red ‘19 (SP) *S-G 7/28 McMANIS Pinot Grigio ‘20 (CA) 6/24 As the name implies, this blend is delish and easy-drinking! ELK COVE Pinot Gris ‘20 (OR) 9/36 Handsome Blends Perky & Crisp PASSIONATE ‘Tinto’ Malbec blend ‘19 (AR) 9/36 MARIETTA ‘Lot 72’ Zin blend (CA) 6/24 TELAYA Viognier ‘20 (Yakima, WA) 9/36 SPLIT RAIL GSM ‘17 Rhone style (ID) By draft! 9 Gls LANZOS Sauvignon Blanc blend ‘19 (SP) *S-G 8/32 NAUTILUS Sauvignon Blanc ‘20 (NZ) *S-G 8/32 Merlot CROW CANYON ‘18 (CA) 5/20 Chardonnay DECOY by Duckhorn ‘19 (Sonoma) 12/48 LOST ANGEL ‘18 (CA) 6/24 Cabernet Sauvignon & Cab Blends LA CREMA ‘18 (Sonoma Coast, CA) 9/36 SALMON CREEK ‘17 (CA) 5/20 ROMBAUER ‘20 (Carneros, CA) 17/68 LOUIS MARTINI ‘18 (Sonoma) 9/36 SLEIGHT OF HAND ‘Spellbinder’ ‘18 (WA) 10/40 BODEGAS LANZOS Blanco 8/Gls J.
    [Show full text]
  • Influencer Poll: Likelihood to Recommend & Support
    Wave 56 Influencer Poll Update January 2018 Public Release Influencer Poll: Likelihood to Recommend & Support 1 Likelihood to Recommend and Support Military Service Likelihood to Recommend and Support Military Service 80% 71% 70% 71% 70% 66% 66% 66% 67% 63% 63% 63% 64% 61% 63% 60% 50% 46% 47% 47% 45% 44% 42% 43% 42% 39% 38% 40% 35% 32% 33% 34% 34% 30% 20% 10% Likely to Recommend: % Likely/Very Likely Likely to Support: % Agree/Strongly Agree Yearly Quarterly 0% Jan–Mar 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Likely to Recommend Military Service Likely to Support Decision to Join § Influencers’ likelihood to support the decision to join the Military increased significantly from 67% in 2015 to 70% in 2016. § However, Influencers’ likelihood to support the decision to join the Military remained stable in January–March 2017. = Significantly change from previous poll Source: Military Ad Tracking Study (Influencer Market) Wave 56 2 Questions: q1a–c: “Suppose [relation] came to you for advice about various post-high school options. How likely is it that you would recommend joining a Military Service such as the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Coast Guard?” q2ff: “If [relation] told me they were planning to join the Military, I would support their decision.” Likelihood to Recommend Military Service By Influencer Type Likelihood to Recommend Military Service 80% 70% 63% 59% 59% 60% 58% 60% 57% 56% 57% 55% 54% 53% 48% 55% 50% 54% 47% 52% 51% 44% 51% 47% 42% 42% 42% 49% 41% 43% 42% 45% 45% 46% 40% 42% 37% 41% 39% 41% 38% 38% 38% 37% 37% 39% 34% 35% 34% 30% 33% 33% 32% 33% 32% 31% 32% 31% 31% 31% 32% 20% 25% 25% 24% 31% 29% 10% % Likely/Very Likely Yearly Quarterly 0% Jan–Mar 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Fathers Mothers Grandparents Other Influencers § Influencers’ likelihood to recommend military service remained stable in January–March 2017 for all influencer groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Case I,I,Emptyset,P7.Nb
    Definitions: In[56]:= $Assumptions = w12 ≥ 0 && w13 ≥ 0 && w16 ≥ 0 && w24 ≥ 0 && w25 ≥ 0 && w36 ≥ 0 && w45 ≥ 0 && u > 0 && v > 0 && w21 ≥ 0 && w31 ≥ 0 && w61 ≥ 0 && w42 ≥ 0 && w52 ≥ 0 && w63 ≥ 0 && w54 ≥ 0 && K34 > 0 && K56 > 0 && K31 > 0 && K51 > 0 w = {{0, w12, w13, 0, 0, w16}, {w21, 0, 0, w24, w25, 0}, {w31, 0, 0, u, 0, w36}, {0, w42, u / K34, 0, w45, 0}, {0, w52, 0, w54, 0, v}, {w61, 0, w63, 0, v / K56, 0}} Out[56]= w12 ≥ 0 && w13 ≥ 0 && w16 ≥ 0 && w24 ≥ 0 && w25 ≥ 0 && w36 ≥ 0 && w45 ≥ 0 && u > 0 && v > 0 && w21 ≥ 0 && w31 ≥ 0 && w61 ≥ 0 && w42 ≥ 0 && w52 ≥ 0 && w63 ≥ 0 && w54 ≥ 0 && K34 > 0 && K56 > 0 && K31 > 0 && K51 > 0 Out[57]= {0, w12, w13, 0, 0, w16}, {w21, 0, 0, w24, w25, 0}, {w31, 0, 0, u, 0, w36}, u v 0, w42, , 0, w45, 0, {0, w52, 0, w54, 0, v}, w61, 0, w63, 0, , 0 K34 K56 In[58]:= MatrixForm[w] Out[58]//MatrixForm= 0 w12 w13 0 0 w16 w21 0 0 w24 w25 0 w31 0 0 u 0 w36 0 w42 u 0 w45 0 K34 0 w52 0 w54 0 v w61 0 w63 0 v 0 K56 Sum of rows In[59]:= d = Table[Total[w[[i, All]]], {i, 6}] d34 = Collect[Expand[d[[3]] * d[[4]] - w[[3, 4]] * w[[4, 3]]], u] d56 = Collect[Expand[d[[5]] * d[[6]] - w[[5, 6]] * w[[6, 5]]], v] u v Out[59]= w12 + w13 + w16, w21 + w24 + w25, u + w31 + w36, + w42 + w45, v + w52 + w54, + w61 + w63 K34 K56 w31 w36 Out[60]= w31 w42 + w36 w42 + w31 w45 + w36 w45 + u + + w42 + w45 K34 K34 w52 w54 Out[61]= w52 w61 + w54 w61 + w52 w63 + w54 w63 + v + + w61 + w63 K56 K56 Effective reaction rates after elimination of metabolites 5 and 6 (useful for easy differentiation w.r.to u), and the final effective reaction rate
    [Show full text]