YUVA BHARATI Voice of Youth
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
YUVA BHARATI Voice of Youth Vol.35 No.10 Chaitra-Vaisakh 5110 May 2008 Rs.10/- CONTENTS Editorial -P. Parameswaran 4 The Work Before us -P. Parameswaran 7 Spiritual Dimensions of Health -N.Krishnamoorti 15 Rama’s Art of Management -Dr. K.Subrahmanyam 25 The Narmada Parikrama --K.K.Venkatraman 30 Personality Development - A Yogic View -Sumant Chandwadkar 38 Single Copy Rs. 10/- Founder Editor Mananeeya Eknathji Ranade Annual Rs. 100/- For 3 Yrs Rs. 275/- Editor Life (10Yrs) Rs. 900/- Mananeeya P. Parameswaran Foreign Subscription Annual - $25US Dollar Editorial Office Life 10 Yrs - $250US Dollar 5, Singarachari Street (Plus Rs. 50/- for outstation Cheques) Triplicane, Chennai - 600 005 Published and printed by L.Madhavan on Ph: (044) 28440042 behalf of Vivekananda Kendra from 5, Email:[email protected] Singarachari Street, Triplicane, Chennai- Web:www.vkendra.org 5. at M/s. RNR Printers and Publishers, 8, Thandavarayan Street, Triplicane, Chennai-5. Editor: P Parameswaran. YUVA BHARATI - May 2008 3 When we look back at Indo-Nepalese relationship through the historical perspectives, we Yadvaktra manasa-sarah pratilabdha-janma will find that Nepal should have been one of our most reliable friends, with inviolable bhasyaravinda-makaranda-rasam pibanti | cultural linkages existing from the dawn of history. Nepal has never wavered in its pratyasam-unmukha-vinita-vineya-bhrngah conviction that they are a Hindu Nation. Likewise, the Great Indian thinkers, even during Tan bhasya-vittaka-gurun pranamami murdhna || the renaissance period, like Swami Vivekananda and Mahayogi Aurobindo, had been unequivocally asserting that India is a Hindu Nation. India and Nepal, though politically and administratively separated and autonomous for historical reasons, Hindu Nationalism had always been the binding chord between the two. If at the time of independence, and thereafter, the leadership in India had realized the centrality of Nepal's relationship to India I bow down in reverence to the (Adi) Guru, Sri Shankara, from whose countenance, and made serious and sincere efforts to cement and strengthen the cultural identity, a much which is like Manasarovar (the holy lake near the Kailas mountain, symbolising the more stable and enduring mutual relationship could have been built up. But, unfortunately divine lake of the mind), the lotus of Bhashyas (commentaries on the Scriptures) took that did not happen. Our first 'visionary' Prime Minister was a total stranger to realpolitik. birth, attracting numerous trained scholars like honey-bees, eager to drink the nectar therein. He cared more for international approbation than for abiding National interest. He was against Monarchy, particularly when it is a Hindu Monarchy, so much so that he kept the ( From the Panchapadika of Sri Padmapada) King of Nepal at arm's length. One could only wish that if farsighted statesmen like Sardar Vallabhai Patel lived longer, probably things would have developed differently. Within the larger framework of Indian Republic, some sort of an autonomous Nepal, with or without a king could have been carved out. But, such a thought would have been anathema to Nehru. But look at China. They had no deep historical and cultural relationship with Tibet as Editorial India had with Nepal. Tibet was anytime closer to India in terms of religion, culture and language. Even the very name Tibet is a derivative from the Sanskrit word: “Trivishtap”. India had intense moral and spiritual authority over Tibet which China could never claim. FROM PASUPATI TO TIRUPATI But China, inherently imperialistic, decided that Tibet should be alienated from India and brought into the Dragon's Coil. They made no bones about it. China marched its army into A garland of explosives around the country's neck Tibet, and forcibly occupied and drove His Holiness, The Dalai Lama with millions of his followers out of Tibet. The whole world meekly acquiesced in the genocide, while India The short-sighted political leadership at the national level right from the time of India's abandoned even her moral claims over the Tibetan region. independence, has been following such unimaginative and myopic policies both at the domestic and the foreign fronts that now Bharat is faced with extremely difficult issues of Now a situation has developed, where not only Tibet but also Nepal have come under the vital importance. The overwhelming victory of the Maosists in Nepal is an ominous sign. Maoist umbrella. It is a clear case of total diplomatic failure and policy bungling on India's Leadership of political parties of whatever hue and persuasion may wholeheartedly or part. Prime Minister Nehru realized his failure too late when despite the much proclaimed halfheartedly welcome the election results, because democracy based on adult franchise has 'Panch Sheel' agreement; Chinese army invaded India and humiliated us. Even afterwards, become a sacred cow. India has not been able to evolve a system of governance in tune with they have been time and again asserting and re-asserting their claim over the entire her own age old democratic temperament; our leadership has been under compulsion to tow Arunachal Pradesh, thus holding out a threat to our sovereignty over the entire border area. the line of the Westminster model which we inherited from our colonial masters. But, All weather roads, huge aerodromes and other military and civilian facilities are being countries like China haven't succumbed to such compulsions. What kind of governance the constructed across our border. Maoist led Nepalese government will follow when it comes to office is a matter which only time can answer. Whatever it may be, there is no doubt that Nepal hereafter is going to be a It is not that Prime Minister Nehru was not warned about these developments in time. major source of insecurity and concern for India. Shri. Guruji, who played a decisive role in the integration of Jammu and Kashmir with India, had also tried for sound friendly relations with Nepal. He had personally visited 4 YUVA BHARATI - Mayl 2008 YUVA BHARATI - May 2008 5 When we look back at Indo-Nepalese relationship through the historical perspectives, we Yadvaktra manasa-sarah pratilabdha-janma will find that Nepal should have been one of our most reliable friends, with inviolable bhasyaravinda-makaranda-rasam pibanti | cultural linkages existing from the dawn of history. Nepal has never wavered in its pratyasam-unmukha-vinita-vineya-bhrngah conviction that they are a Hindu Nation. Likewise, the Great Indian thinkers, even during Tan bhasya-vittaka-gurun pranamami murdhna || the renaissance period, like Swami Vivekananda and Mahayogi Aurobindo, had been unequivocally asserting that India is a Hindu Nation. India and Nepal, though politically and administratively separated and autonomous for historical reasons, Hindu Nationalism had always been the binding chord between the two. If at the time of independence, and thereafter, the leadership in India had realized the centrality of Nepal's relationship to India I bow down in reverence to the (Adi) Guru, Sri Shankara, from whose countenance, and made serious and sincere efforts to cement and strengthen the cultural identity, a much which is like Manasarovar (the holy lake near the Kailas mountain, symbolising the more stable and enduring mutual relationship could have been built up. But, unfortunately divine lake of the mind), the lotus of Bhashyas (commentaries on the Scriptures) took that did not happen. Our first 'visionary' Prime Minister was a total stranger to realpolitik. birth, attracting numerous trained scholars like honey-bees, eager to drink the nectar therein. He cared more for international approbation than for abiding National interest. He was against Monarchy, particularly when it is a Hindu Monarchy, so much so that he kept the ( From the Panchapadika of Sri Padmapada) King of Nepal at arm's length. One could only wish that if farsighted statesmen like Sardar Vallabhai Patel lived longer, probably things would have developed differently. Within the larger framework of Indian Republic, some sort of an autonomous Nepal, with or without a king could have been carved out. But, such a thought would have been anathema to Nehru. But look at China. They had no deep historical and cultural relationship with Tibet as Editorial India had with Nepal. Tibet was anytime closer to India in terms of religion, culture and language. Even the very name Tibet is a derivative from the Sanskrit word: “Trivishtap”. India had intense moral and spiritual authority over Tibet which China could never claim. FROM PASUPATI TO TIRUPATI But China, inherently imperialistic, decided that Tibet should be alienated from India and brought into the Dragon's Coil. They made no bones about it. China marched its army into A garland of explosives around the country's neck Tibet, and forcibly occupied and drove His Holiness, The Dalai Lama with millions of his followers out of Tibet. The whole world meekly acquiesced in the genocide, while India The short-sighted political leadership at the national level right from the time of India's abandoned even her moral claims over the Tibetan region. independence, has been following such unimaginative and myopic policies both at the domestic and the foreign fronts that now Bharat is faced with extremely difficult issues of Now a situation has developed, where not only Tibet but also Nepal have come under the vital importance. The overwhelming victory of the Maosists in Nepal is an ominous sign. Maoist umbrella. It is a clear