<<

FROM ANGRY YOUNG SCHOLARSHIP BOY TO MALE ROLE MODEL:THE RISE OF THE WORKING-CLASS HERO

SEBASTIAN MÜLLER

Abstract “Working-Class Hero is something to be”, John Lennon sings, and he might mean: “at least something.” Thus it becomes understandable that the “original ” Jimmy Porter (’s ) and Joe Lampton (’s ) fall back on this mythologically charged mode of subcultural subject formation. And a closer look reveals that both are not only in a class, but also a gender conflict. Both of them produce themselves as typical working-class heroes, a subcultural male subject form that gains further influence through protagonists like ’s Arthur Seaton (in his bestselling Saturday Night and Sunday Morning). As a consequence, the working-class hero slowly but unstoppably steps out of the depths of his former realms into the light of social attention, becoming a male role-model to believe in, and thus becoming some- thing to really be. In a modern or postmodern world of shifting identi- ties, the working-class hero provides a very simple but effectively re- affirming mode of male identity formation; a mode of subject for- mation that, as we shall see, even gains global influence through one outstanding and very specific product of mass media representation: James Bond.

When John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger was first performed at the in on May 8th, 1956, and hit the stage as a “working class Hamlet”1 Jimmy Porter, a new era for

1 This phrase is used on the back cover of the current Penguin paperback edition. Analogously, a 1962 Centre 42 National Youth Theatre performance of Hamlet in

© Sebastian Müller, 2015 | doi 10.1163/9789004299009_010 This is an open access chapter distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. 170 Sebastian Müller

English literature began: fostered not so much by a consistent literary movement but mainly by considerable media attention and an extraor- dinary publicity campaign, “angry young men” conquered theatre stages, cinema screens and bestseller lists.2 In this essay, I will argue that Jimmy Porter and the “post-Osborne revolution”3 not only set the stage for upcoming vital theatre productions and became a role-model for a series of angry texts, but that they also provided an effective mode of male identity formation, that is the “working-class hero”, as a model of male identity that is still effective in our time. I intend to show that Jimmy Porter as well as Joe Lampton – the protagonist of John Braine’s Room at the Top and one of the many other original an- gry young men – fall back on this mythologically charged mode of subcultural subject formation when they are trapped between the brave new world of the aspiring middle class and their ambiguous working-class origins. A closer look will reveal that both are not only in class trouble, but also in a gender conflict. With their pride and masculinity at stake, Joe and Jimmy strive for compensations for their frustration: Jimmy by attacking and intimidating upper-class prigs, Joe by materially extend- ing his working-class physicality through financial potency and status symbols. Yet both of them produce themselves as typical working- class heroes, since this subcultural male subject form serves as a very simple but effectively reaffirming mode of male identity formation. Moreover, it develops into a male role model that, as we shall finally see, even gains global influence today through one outstanding and very specific product of mass media representation: James Bond.

The post-war years and the 1950s: from euphoria to the “angry decade” Revolutionary though he might have been, Jimmy Porter was still a product of his time, the “angry decade”, as the 1950s were called by Kenneth Allsop.4 A short summary of the socio-cultural changes of

Nottingham was billed as “Shakespeare’s Jimmy Porter” (see Alan Sinfield, Litera- ture, Politics and Culture in Postwar Britain, Oxford: Blackwell, 1989, 265). 2 See Stuart Laing, Representations of Working-Class Life, 1957-1964, London: Macmillan, 1986, 62. 3 Ibid., 87. 4 Kenneth Allsop, The Angry Decade: A Survey of the Cultural Revolt of the Nineteen- Fifties, Wendover: Goodchild, 1985.