Com Chair Report AGM 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Com Chair Report AGM 2011 The East Africa Natural History Society Plot. 83, Tufnel Drive Kamwokya.. P. O. Box 27034, Kampala, Uganda. Tel. + 256 414 540719. Fax 533528. E-mail: [email protected] CHAIRMAN’S REPORT AT THE OPENING OF THE 19TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING HELD ON 27 th MAY 2011 AT UGANDA MUSEUM, KAMPALA. Executive Committee Members NatureUganda members and partners Invited guests, ladies and gentlemen, Let me start by welcoming you all to NatureUganda’s 19 th Annual General Meeting but the 102nd AGM of the East Africa Natural History Society. You are members of the oldest conservation organization in the region and undoubtedly one that has immensely contributed to the conservation of nature. For Members today, you should also be proud that you are the team that is setting foundations for the new century. We could be compared to those who started the organization in 1909, the difference is that for them they started from scratch but for us we are building into the achievements of the last century. Since the last AGM in November, the EC has met two times. I want to thank my colleagues for the commitment that you continue to exhibit and the love you have for this centurion organization. Let me introduce those who are present. I will be presenting some of the issues that they have discussed and recommended for your approval so as to move our organization forward. Our term has also been very short (five months) but a lot has happened. At the last AGM that was held on the 3rd h November 2010 two important things happened. 1) You changed the financial year from April-March to January-December. As you may realize, our AGM is coming too early in the year, compared to the previous years. This is a result of the decision you made last year to change our financial calendar. For those who have been members longer, you may remember that the decision to have April-march as our financial year was based on the fact that major donors at the time used this same period. However NatureUganda has grown and has attracted many partners with different financial periods. The decision you made last year therefore reflected the maturity of our organization to set its own standards. Our financial year will therefore start from January to December and from now onwards, the treasurer’s financial report will reflect this new arrangement. Our AGM therefore will be held in the first month of the second quarter (April) of every year to allow for the auditing of accounts in the first quarter of the year. 2) The second thing that happened was that for the first time in our history we failed to secure valid nominations for executive Committee members and we could not hold election. We could look at this issue in two ways. It could have been a vote of confidence for the existing EC members having performed very well for the previous two years. For that I would say thank you for your appreciation. But it could also have been that members lost interest in the organization and therefore did not bather with nomination. However this is not reflected in other areas such as attendance of events such as nature walks, public talks, excursions or even AGM. Nonetheless, even if it was the former, you have a constitutional right to elect an EC that will spearhead the implementation of your programme for the year. I have been informed by the secretariat that this time we have nomination and many new nominations. Ladies and gentlemen, allow me to expound more on the issue of elections. NatureUganda operates under the East Africa natural History Society (EANHS) constitution. This constitution manages NatureKenya and NatureUganda as two sister organizations in Kenya and Uganda. I will not go deep 1 into the discussion of history because you know it and you can read more details on our documents including the website. However, suffice to know that the two organizations are autonomous and locally registered in the respective countries. We are therefore bound by history but operate independently and we have developed unique features overtime. The constitution that guides this organization may not have sufficient detail for us or NatureKenya as well. Indeed the EC has received communication from NatureKenya to this effect. The EC has considered the views expressed by NatureKenya and has scrutinized our operations and recommends to the AGM the following; That NatureUganda remains committed to regional partnership through the East Africa Natural History Society and be proud of the history and contribution that the society has done over the century to document wildlife in East African region and conservation of nature. However the new developments indicate that NatureUganda and NatureKenya may want to pursue a national agenda that may require that we develop independent guidelines. This means NU develops its own constitution that will guide its operations in Uganda and NatureKenya does the same. The two organizations would then cooperate under EANHS through a Memorandum of understanding specifying roles and various areas of cooperation The EC has two subcommittees; i.e. the Finance committee headed by the Treasurer Mr. Nabanyumya and the Science and Technical Committee headed by Prof. Pomeroy. The two subcommittees have performed very well and now we do realize what we missed before they were put in place. The Finance committee has had two meetings. This committee spearheaded the audit process for a nine months period (April 2010-December 2010) in order to set the beginning of the new financial arrangement that you approved last year. The report is available and the treasurer will present the outcome. The subcommittee has also embarked on another important task to develop a chat of accounts or financial frame work for the organization. As you know NU implements a large programme and technical and financial support from various sources. The committee would like to create a framework that can easily capture the scope of the organization incorporating all projects and activities. This will ease the reporting by the secretariat and Monitoring and evaluation by the EC. The most important comment I can make is that NU is still health programmatically and financially. It has always been my wish that at every AGM, a new EC takes over a health organization. The Science and Technical committee has met three times since the last AGM in November. In addition to monitoring and supervising the scientific work of the organization, they are supporting the secretariat to develop key documents both for the organization and the general public. Three documents are completed; the checklist for birds of Uganda, 20 years of waterfowl counts and Proceedings of the first Conservation Conference. Other documents such as the Popular Birds handbook are in advanced stages. NatureUganda is known for its scientific work as the main objective why the EANHS was established. We are glad that this committee continues to strengthen this position. At this point I want to call upon the working groups to be vigilant with your work to reinforce this committee. Please contact the secretariat and you will be advised on how to participate in working group activities and registration forms are available at the registration desk. Let me report briefly on our conservation programme. The conservation programme is informed by the science and therefore a big connection with the S&T committee. NU has developed its programmes to focus its attention on the priority issues for conservation based on priority species, priority sites and priority habitats. We are implementing over eight projects that contribute to those priority areas. I will encourage you to visit the secretariat to lean more on the details of the conservation programmes and how you, as members, can make a contribution. I will highlight some achievements On priority species, one example is the grey-crowned Crane, Uganda’s national symbol. NU is working with other international partners such as BirdLife International and IUCN in highlighting critical species for conservation. Based on information that we have collected on the Grey-crowned Crane over ten 2 years, its population is declining rapidly and working with our partners the species is recognized as vulnerable globally. This means that if nothing is done it can disappear in less than 25 years. NU working with national and regional partners in all range states, we have developed a species action plan that we hope will help government to develop a species specific policy by end of 2011 to save our national symbol from extinction. NU is already implementing conservation activities in central and western Uganda to conserve the cranes. There are other examples of birds, mammals, plants, microbial resources where NU is working. On priority sites, the working on conservation of key biodiversity areas has continued. These include Important Bird Areas, Ramsar sites and protected areas. NU is working on all Ramsar sites in Uganda through conservation activities, working local communities and government, research or monitoring. We also continue to cover all IBAs. We are collating information on Mabamba Ramsar sites to extend its boundaries to cover new areas of Makanaga bay in Mpigi District. We have also started documentation of Lake Bunyonyi as potential Ramsar site that will cover Nyamuriro IBA. We are also exploring opportunity to extend Nabajjuzi wetland to cover the whole of Katonga River basin. We have completed sites account for Kibimba wetland as the new IBA making 34 IBAs in Uganda. Documentation and research work will begin this year on Kalinzu Forest Reserve as a potential IBA. Although Ramsar Sites and IBAs are not protected areas, they are internationally recognized categories as key biodiversity areas and since government have committed itself to conservation of critical species and sites through CBD, Ramsar and other conventions, NU supports government to implement its international obligations.
Recommended publications
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda
    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Uganda: an Assessment and Review
    Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2014, 6, 1297-1315 Published Online October 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jwarp http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2014.614120 Water Resources of Uganda: An Assessment and Review Francis N. W. Nsubuga1,2*, Edith N. Namutebi3, Masoud Nsubuga-Ssenfuma2 1Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa 2National Environmental Consult Ltd., Kampala, Uganda 3Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kampala, Uganda Email: *[email protected] Received 1 August 2014; revised 26 August 2014; accepted 18 September 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Water resources of a country constitute one of its vital assets that significantly contribute to the socio-economic development and poverty eradication. However, this resource is unevenly distri- buted in both time and space. The major source of water for these resources is direct rainfall, which is recently experiencing variability that threatens the distribution of resources and water availability in Uganda. The annual rainfall received in Uganda varies from 500 mm to 2800 mm, with an average of 1180 mm received in two main seasons. The spatial distribution of rainfall has resulted into a network of great rivers and lakes that possess big potential for development. These resources are being developed and depleted at a fast rate, a situation that requires assessment to establish present status of water resources in the country. The paper reviews the characteristics, availability, demand and importance of present day water resources in Uganda as well as describ- ing the various issues, challenges and management of water resources of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Uganda
    AFB.PPRC.27-28.2 AFB/PPRC.26-27/2 21 June 2021 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee PROPOSAL FOR UGANDA AFB/PPRC.27-28/2 Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines (OPG) for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund (the Fund), adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board), state in paragraph 45 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one-step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two-step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the endorsement of the Board. In the second step, the fully-developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would ultimately require the Board’s approval. 2. The Templates approved by the Board (Annex 5 of the OPG, as amended in March 2016) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • PPCR SPCR for Uganda
    PPCR/SC.20/6 May 11, 2017 Meeting of the PPCR Sub-Committee Washington D.C. Thursday, June 8, 2017 Agenda Item 6 PPCR STRATEGIC PROGRAM FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE FOR UGANDA PROPOSED DECISION The PPCR Sub-Committee, having reviewed the document PPCR/SC.20/6, Strategic Program for Climate Resilience for Uganda [endorses] the SPCR. The Sub-Committee encourages the Government of Uganda and the MDBs to actively seek resources from other bilateral or multilateral sources to fund further development and implementation of the projects foreseen in the strategic plan. Uganda Strategic Program for Climate Resilience (Uganda SPCR) Republic of Uganda STRATEGIC PROGRAM FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE: UGANDA PILOT PROGRAM FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE (PPCR) Prepared for the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR) 2 May, 2017 i Uganda Strategic Program for Climate Resilience (Uganda SPCR) Foreword The Government of Uganda recognizes the effects of climate change and the need to address them within the national and international strategic frameworks. This Strategic Program for Climate Resilience (SPCR) is a framework for addressing the challenges of climate change that impact on the national economy including development of resilience by vulnerable communities. The overall objective of the SPCR is to ensure that all stakeholders address climate change impacts and their causes in a coordinated manner through application of appropriate measures, while promoting sustainable development and a green economy. This SPCR will build on and catalyzes existing efforts in climate resilience-building Programs in Uganda, and will address key identified barriers and constraints, in order to accelerate the transformative accumulation of benefits of climate resilience and sustainable socio-economic development in the targeted sectors and areas.
    [Show full text]
  • National Nile Basin Water Quality Monitoring Baseline Report For
    Nile Basin Initiative Transboundary EnvironmentalAction Project National Nile Basin Water Quality Monitoring Baseline Report for UGANDA NILEBASIN INITIATIVE THE NILE BASIN TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT BASELINE STUDY OF THE STATUS OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN UGANDA BY MOSES OTIM APRIL 2005 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES..................................................................................................... IV LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................ V LIST OF BOXES........................................................................................................ VI ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................VII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................IX 1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................16 1.1 THE NILE BASIN............................................................................................16 1.2 THE NILE BASIN IN UGANDA...............................................................................17 1.3 GEOLOGY .......................................................................................................19 1.4 MINERALISATION...............................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Assessment Report for the Nile River Basin
    Baseline Assessment Report for the Nile River Basin The Aswan High Dam Nile River Ir. E Olet, Ir. Koen Roest, Dr. M. v. Mansfeld, Ir. R. Smit, Ir. P. v. Walsum Report of the NeWater project - New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty www.newater.info Title Baseline assessment report for the Nile River Basin Purpose Filename Authors Ir. E Olet, Ir. Koen Roest, Dr. M. v. Mansfeld, Ir. R. Smit, Ir. P. v. Walsum Document history Current version. Changes to previous version. Date Status Final Target readership General readership Correct reference Ir. E Olet, Ir. Koen Roest, Dr. M. v. Mansfeld, Ir. R. Smit, Ir. P. v. Walsum, editors January 2006 Prepared under contract from the European Commission Contract no 511179 (GOCE) Integrated Project in PRIORITY 6.3 Global Change and Ecosystems in the 6th EU framework programme Deliverable title: Baseline assessment report for the Nile River Basin Deliverable no.: D 3.7.1 Due date of deliverable: Month 4 Actual submission date: Month 13 Start of the project: 01.01.2005 Duration: 4 years DISCLAIMER This is the Nile Basin Baseline Vulnerability Assessment for Adaptive water management under the EU Funded NeWater project. It has drawn inspiration from the works of Diana Rizzollio Karyabwite, Sharing waters of the Nile valley , and works of Mahmoud Moustafa and Francis Gichuki, 2003, Nile basin profile, 2003. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the EU Framework on Adaptive management in river basins nor the views held by the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Kbas in the Great Lakes Region (Arranged Alphabetically)
    Appendix 1. Terrestrial KBAs in the Great Lakes Region (arranged alphabetically) Terrestrial KBAs Country Map No.1 Area (ha) Protect AZE3 Pressure Biological Other Action CEPF ion2 Priority4 funding5 Priority6 EAM7 Ajai Wildlife Reserve Uganda 1 15,800 **** medium 4 1 3 Akagera National Park Rwanda 2 100,000 *** medium 3 3 3 Akanyaru wetlands Rwanda 3 30,000 * high 4 0 2 Bandingilo South Sudan 4 1,650,000 **** unknown 4 3 3 Bangweulu swamps (Mweru ) Zambia 5 1,284,000 *** high 4 3 2 Belete-Gera Forest Ethiopia 6 152,109 **** unknown 3 3 3 Y Bonga forest Ethiopia 7 161,423 **** medium 2 3 3 Y Budongo Forest Reserve Uganda 8 79,300 **** medium 2 3 3 Y Bugoma Central Forest Uganda 9 40,100 low 2 3 3 **** Y Reserve Bugungu Wildlife Reserve Uganda 10 47,300 **** medium 4 3 3 Y Bulongwa Forest Reserve Tanzania 11 203 **** unknown 4 0 3 Y Burigi - Biharamulo Game Tanzania 12 350,000 unknown 4 0 3 **** Reserves Bururi Forest Nature Reserve Burundi 13 1,500 **** medium 3 1 3 Y Busia grasslands Kenya 14 250 * very high 4 1 2 Bwindi Impenetrable National Uganda 15 32,700 low 1 3 3 **** Y Park 1 See Basin level maps in Appendix 6. 2 Categorised * <10% protected; ** 10-49% protected; *** 50-90% protected: **** >90% protected. 3 Alliaqnce for Zero Extinction site (Y = yes). See section 2.2.2. 4 See Section 9.2. 5 0 – no funding data; 1 – some funding up to US$50k allocated; 2 – US$50-US$250k; 3 – >US$250k.
    [Show full text]
  • Year E1 Ded 31Sf Ecember 1948
    Annual Report of the Game Department for the year ended 31st December, 1948 Item Type monograph Publisher Game Department, Uganda Protectorate Download date 30/09/2021 19:51:18 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/35554 1 • - ----~--- UAD P 07£CTOI • E OF H' D E FOR THE Year e1 ded 31 sf ecember 1948 CE: THR E HILL S LIST OF CONTENTS : ... Section I.-Administration Page Financial-Expenditure and Revenue - 1-2 Il1ega! Killing of Game and Breaches of Game Laws 2-3 Legislation Affecting Game 3-4 Game Reserves and Sanctuaries 4-5 Game Trophie" including Table ofWeights of "Licence" Ivory 5 Section II.-Elephant Control General Remarks ... 6 'Return of Elephants Destroyed 6 Table of Control Ivory, based on tusk weight, and notes 6 Table of Found Ivory from Control areas, and notes 7 Notes on Game Rangers and Game Guards 7 District C,mtrol ... ... 8-12 General Notes:-- European Killed by Elephant 12 Capture of Juvenile Elephants 12 Biological Research 12 Recoveries of Illegally-possessed Ivory 12 Anthrax from Elephant Tusks 12-13 Power of Rifles '3-' 4 • Section III.-Notes on the Faqna (A) MAMMALS:­ (i) Primates '4- 5 , ' (ii) Carnivora '5-,6 :-; (iii) Ungulates 16-21 (iv) Tubulidentata 21. (v) Nomarthra 21-. (vi) Rodentia .... _~-<l2 • , -., ';I(1l) BIRDS .. 22-.'1 .",. Tables of Recoveries of Birds Ringed in Europe and notes 27-28 (C) REPTILES 28-2 9 Section IV.-General ·0 ..-~ .. (A) DISEASES OF GAME:­ Rinderpest .... Rinderpest Conference Other Diseases Tsetse-Control in Connection with Game .. (B) ECONOMIC INDUSTRIES:- Crocodile Skins • GlImeSkins ..
    [Show full text]
  • Where Ichthyofaunal Provinces Meet: the Fish Fauna of the Lake Edward System
    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT, UNCORRECTED, NOT TO BE USED FOR CITATIONS, REFERENCING OR TAXONOMIC PURPOSES 1 Where ichthyofaunal provinces meet: the fish fauna of the Lake Edward system 2 3 E. Decru1,2†, N. Vranken1,2, P. H. N. Bragança3, J. Snoeks1,2 & M. Van Steenberge1,2,4 4 5 1Section Vertebrates, Biology Department, Royal Museum for Central Africa, 6 Leuvensesteenweg 13, 3080, Tervuren, Belgium 7 2Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Department of Biology, University 8 of Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium 9 3Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 10 Av. Pedro Calmon, 550, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-901, Brazil 11 4Operational Directorate Taxonomy and Phylogeny, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural 12 Sciences, Vautier Street, 29, 1000 Brussels 13 14 †Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: +32(0)2 769 56 32; email: 15 [email protected] 16 1 16 17 ABSTRACT 18 Based on literature, museum collections and three recent expeditions, an annotated species list 19 of the Lake Edward drainage system is presented, excluding the endemic haplochromines. A 20 total of 34 non-Haplochromis species belonging to 10 families and 21 genera are recorded 21 from the system. Three of these are endemic and two others have been introduced in the 22 region. Six species are new records for the Lake Edward system. A species accumulation 23 curve indicates that we probably covered most of the non-Haplochromis species in the area 24 sampled during the recent expeditions. However, undetected species might still be present in 25 the Congolese part of the system, which is poorly sampled.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 7 Nutrient Loading
    Nutrient Loading. Item Type Report Section Authors Mayanga, V.; Osio, J.; Mwebembezi, L.; Myanza, O.; Opango, P.; Majaliwa, J.; Oleko, C.; Okwerede, L.; Gor, S.; Byamukama, D.; Mathayo, A.; Masongo, F.; Kanyesigye, C.; Kitamirike, J.; Semalulu, O.; Hecky, R. Publisher Lake Victoria Environment Management Project (LVEMP) Download date 25/09/2021 02:38:00 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/6906 Regional 103 Lake Victoria Environment Report CHAPTER 7 Nutrient Loading V. P. Mnyanga1, J.O. Osio2, L. Mwebembezi3, O.I. Myanza1, P.O. Opango2, J.G.M. Majaliwa4, C.O. Oleko2, L. Okwerede5, S.A. Gor2, D. Byamukama6, A.A. Mathayo7, F.O. Masongo2, C. Kanyesigye5, J.M. Kitamirike3, O. Semalulu4 and R.E. Hecky8 1 LVEMP, Water Quality and Ecosystem Management Component, Box 211 Mwanza, Tanzania 2 LVEMP, Water Quality and Ecosystem Management Component, Box 1922 Kisumu, Kenya 3. LVEMP, Water Quality and Ecosystem Management Component, Box 19 Entebbe, Uganda 4. LVEMP, Land-Use and Management Component, Box 7065, Kampala-Uganda 5. LVEMP, National Water and Sewerage Corporation, Box 7053, Kampala-Uganda 6. LVEMP, Makerere University Institute of Environment and Natural Resources, Box. 7298, Kampala Uganda 7. LVEMP, Water Quality and Ecosystem Management Component, Box 1112, Musoma, Tanzania 8. Biology Department, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W., Waterloo, Antorio N2L 3GI ABSTRACT. It is now recognized by most of the scientific community that Lake Victoria is enriched with nutrients. There are, however, conflicting reports on the magnitude of nutrients received from different sources and the dynamics of nutrients in the Lake. Studies were carried out to determine the lake nutrient balance and suggest strategies for sustainable utilization of the resources.
    [Show full text]
  • MABAMBA BAY WETLAND COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Mabamba Bay Wetland Eco-Tourism Association
    MABAMBA BAY WETLAND COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Mabamba Bay Wetland Eco-Tourism Association MABAMBA BAY WETLAND COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Mabamba Bay Wetland Eco-Tourism Association i Mabamba Bay Wetland Community Action Plan, Kasanje Sub-County, Wakiso District Supported by: BirdLife International, NatureUganda and the Aage V. Jensen Charity Foundation Through: The Local Community Empowerment Project September 2014 MABAMBA BAY WETLAND COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Mabamba Bay Wetland Eco-Tourism Association i MABAMBA BAY WETLAND COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN ii Mabamba Bay Wetland Eco-Tourism Association Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS iv 1.0 BACKGROUND 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Justification 1 2.0 SITE AND COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT 2 2.1 Site description 2 2.1.1 Location and boundaries 2 2.1.2 Habitat description 2 2.1.3 Official protection and management status 2 2.1.4 Tenure/ ownership 3 2.1.5 Biodiversity importance 4 2.1.6 Physical features 4 2.1.7 Current land use 5 2.2 Natural resources and their use 5 2.2.1. Natural Resources 5 2.2.2 Location and distribution of resources 6 2.2.3 Access, Management and use of Natural Resources 6 2.2.4 Seasonal patterns of resource availability and use 7 2.2.5 Threat Assessment/Hazard Mapping 7 2.2.6 Livelihoods Vulnerability assessment 8 2.2.7 Conservation measures taken 9 2.3 The Community 10 2.3.1 Community Structure, Organisation and Processes 10 2.3.2 Name, location and resources 10 2.3.3. Objectives of the Community group 10 2.3.4 Current status of the community 10 2.4 External stakeholders and their relations 10 3.0
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impact Statement for the Rwamwanja Refugee Settlement, Kamwenge District
    Office of the Prime Minister, in partnership with United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE RWAMWANJA REFUGEE SETTLEMENT, KAMWENGE DISTRICT Prepared by International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in Association with United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Rwenzo – Green Associates Ltd 1 Table of Contents CONSULTANCY TEAM ........................................................................................................ 6 LIST OF ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................... 7 Measures and units: .......................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 25 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................... 25 1.2 Purpose of the ESIA .......................................................................................... 26 1.3 Objectives of Environment and Social Impact Assessment ........................... 27 2. ESIA Methodology ................................................................................................... 28 2.1 General Methodology ....................................................................................... 28 2.2 Specific Approaches .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]