National Nile Basin Water Quality Monitoring Baseline Report For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Nile Basin Water Quality Monitoring Baseline Report For Nile Basin Initiative Transboundary EnvironmentalAction Project National Nile Basin Water Quality Monitoring Baseline Report for UGANDA NILEBASIN INITIATIVE THE NILE BASIN TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT BASELINE STUDY OF THE STATUS OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN UGANDA BY MOSES OTIM APRIL 2005 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES..................................................................................................... IV LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................ V LIST OF BOXES........................................................................................................ VI ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................VII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................IX 1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................16 1.1 THE NILE BASIN............................................................................................16 1.2 THE NILE BASIN IN UGANDA...............................................................................17 1.3 GEOLOGY .......................................................................................................19 1.4 MINERALISATION...............................................................................................21 1.4 MINERALISATION...............................................................................................22 1.5 GEOMORPHOLOGY..........................................................................................22 1.6 CATCHMENT SOILS............................................................................................23 1.7 CLIMATE ..........................................................................................................23 1.8 LAND COVER ...................................................................................................24 1.9 LAND USE.........................................................................................................26 2.0 THE NILE BASIN WATER RESOURCES IN UGANDA .......................................28 2.1 SURFACE WATER SOURCES .................................................................................28 2.2 GROUND WATER..............................................................................................34 2.3 THE WETLANDS AND THEIR VALUES ......................................................................34 2.4 WATER RESOURCES: USE AND SIGNIFICANCE IN UGANDA .....................................38 2.4.1 Water for domestic use ......................................................................38 2.4.2 Water for production ..........................................................................38 2.4.3 Other water uses .................................................................................39 2.5 BASIN WATER BIOLOGICAL BIODIVERSITY..............................................................39 2.6 WATER RESOURCE QUALITY CONCERNS...............................................................41 2.7 NEED FOR THE BASELINE SURVEY..........................................................................41 2.8 OVERVIEW OF OBJECTIVES AND OUTPUTS OF THE SURVEY.......................................42 3.0 BASELINE SURVEY ORGANISATION AND METHODOLOGY........................43 3.1 REVIEW OF EXISTING DOCUMENTATION...............................................................43 3.2 CONSULTATIONS WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS ...........................................................44 3.3 USE OF FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS..................................................................44 3.4 SPECIALISED DATA ............................................................................................45 3.5 GEOGRAPHICAL STRATEGY AND STUDY POPULATION............................................45 3.6 FIELD VISITS.......................................................................................................45 3.7 THE MANPOWER STRATEGY................................................................................46 4.0 BASELINE SURVEY RESULTS ........................................................................47 4.1 WATER RESOURCE POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK......................47 4.1.1 Background and rationale ................................................................47 i 4.1.2 History of water resources monitoring and management activities .........................................................................................................48 4.1.3 Policy Framework for Water Resources Management..................49 4.1.4 The legal framework ...........................................................................50 4.1.5 Enabling Regulations for Water Resources and Water Quality Management................................................................................................52 4.2 WATER RESOURCES: WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE, MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS......................................................................................54 4.2.1 National Structure for Management of Water Resources ............54 4.2.2 Management structure for WRMD ...................................................55 4.2.3 Private service providers, User Groups and Associations..............56 4.2.5 The Private sector ................................................................................58 4.2.6 Non-Governmental organizations ....................................................58 4.2.7 Basin and Catchment conservation projects.................................59 4.2.9 Other Government and Research Institutions ................................60 4.2.10 Water Quality Monitoring and surveillance ..................................60 4.3 WATER QUALITY MONITORING LABORATORIES, THEIR CAPACITIES AND REGIONAL INITIATIVES ..............................................................................................................61 4.3.1 Water Resources Management Department.................................61 4.3.2 The Fisheries Resources Research Institute ......................................62 4.3.3 National Water and Sewerage Corporation, and other service providers.........................................................................................................63 4.3.4 The Government Analytical Laboratory..........................................64 4.3.5 Academic and research Institutions ................................................64 4.3.7 The regulated community: Industry..................................................64 4.3.8 LVEMP: Water Quality Monitoring and Ecosystems Management Component...................................................................................................65 4.3.9 The Lake Victoria Fisheries Organisation..........................................66 4.3.10 The Nile Basin Water Resources Project.........................................66 4.4 WATER QUALITY: BASELINE STATUS......................................................................66 4.4.1 Point and non-point sources..............................................................66 4.4.2 Water quality: rivers, streams and wetlands ...................................62 4.4.3 Lake water quality...............................................................................63 4.4.4 Groundwater sources.........................................................................67 4.4.5 Private sector initiatives: some case studies ...................................68 4.4.6 Water quality concerns: response from the Districts......................70 4.4.7 Water quality research .......................................................................70 4.4.8 Summary of major threats to water quality.....................................70 4.5 COLLABORATION AMONG INSTITUTIONS IN WATER QUALITY MONITORING..............71 4.6 INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF LABORATORIES .....................................................72 4.6.1 Laboratory status.................................................................................72 4.6.2 Training and development opportunities........................................72 5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENTATIONS...................................................74 5.1 WATER QUALITY MONITORING GAPS ...................................................................74 5.2 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT GAPS .................................................................75 5.3 SPATIAL ISSUES AND TOOLS IN WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT ....................................76 ii 5.4 THE FUTURE ......................................................................................................77 REFERENCES ..........................................................................................................78 APPENDICES ..........................................................................................................82 APPENDIX 1: INSTRUMENTS FOR DATA COLLECTION.....................................................83 APPENDIX 2: LIST OF CONSULTED INDIVIDUALS AND INSTITUTIONS .................................89 APPENDIX 3: INVENTORY OF LABORATORIES INVOLVED IN WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS.......91 APPENDIX 4: WATER RESOURCES MONITORING NETWORKS .........................................70 Appendix 4.1.1: Map of Water quality monitoring
Recommended publications
  • Lake Opeta Wetland System Ramsar Information Sheet
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7, as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties. Note for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Bureau. Compilers are strongly urged to provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of maps. LAKE OPETA WETLAND SYSTEM RAMSAR INFORMATION SHEET 1. Name and address of the RIS Compiler: Achilles Byaruhanga and Stephen Kigoolo NatureUganda Plot 83, Tufnel Drive, Kamwokya P. O Box 27034, Kampala - Uganda. Tel: 256 41 540719 Fax no: 256 41 533 528 E-mail: [email protected] 2. Date: 17 September 2005. 3. Country: The Republic of Uganda 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Lake Opeta Wetland System 5. Map of the Ramsar site: Hard copy: attached Digital (electronic) format: yes 6. Geographical coordinates: 34004" - 34024" E and 01033" - 01051" N,. 7. General Location: Lake Opeta and its surrounding swamps is located in north eastern Uganda, in four districts of Nakapiripirit (Namalu sub-county and Lorachat sub-county), Sironko (Bunambutye sub- county), Katakwi (Usuku county, Magoro sub-county) and Kumi (Kolir sub-county, Malera sub-county and Ongino sub-county). It is located 25 kms from Kumi town and the northern part borders a Wildlife Reserve, Pian-Upe Wildlife Reserve and Teso Community Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda
    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UGANDA: PLANNING MAP (Details)
    IMU, UNOCHA Uganda http://www.ugandaclusters.ug http://ochaonline.un.org UGANDA: PLANNING MAP (Details) SUDAN NARENGEPAK KARENGA KATHILE KIDEPO NP !( NGACINO !( LOPULINGI KATHILE AGORO AGU FR PABAR AGORO !( !( KAMION !( Apoka TULIA PAMUJO !( KAWALAKOL RANGELAND ! KEI FR DIBOLYEC !( KERWA !( RUDI LOKWAKARAMOE !( POTIKA !( !( PAWACH METU LELAPWOT LAWIYE West PAWOR KALAPATA MIDIGO NYAPEA FR LOKORI KAABONG Moyo KAPALATA LODIKO ELENDEREA PAJAKIRI (! KAPEDO Dodoth !( PAMERI LAMWO FR LOTIM MOYO TC LICWAR KAPEDO (! WANDI EBWEA VUURA !( CHAKULYA KEI ! !( !( !( !( PARACELE !( KAMACHARIKOL INGILE Moyo AYUU POBURA NARIAMAOI !( !( LOKUNG Madi RANGELAND LEFORI ALALI OKUTI LOYORO AYIPE ORAA PAWAJA Opei MADI NAPORE MORUKORI GWERE MOYO PAMOYI PARAPONO ! MOROTO Nimule OPEI PALAJA !( ALURU ! !( LOKERUI PAMODO MIGO PAKALABULE KULUBA YUMBE PANGIRA LOKOLIA !( !( PANYANGA ELEGU PADWAT PALUGA !( !( KARENGA !( KOCHI LAMA KAL LOKIAL KAABONG TEUSO Laropi !( !( LIMIDIA POBEL LOPEDO DUFILE !( !( PALOGA LOMERIS/KABONG KOBOKO MASALOA LAROPI ! OLEBE MOCHA KATUM LOSONGOLO AWOBA !( !( !( DUFILE !( ORABA LIRI PALABEK KITENY SANGAR MONODU LUDARA OMBACHI LAROPI ELEGU OKOL !( (! !( !( !( KAL AKURUMOU KOMURIA MOYO LAROPI OMI Lamwo !( KULUBA Koboko PODO LIRI KAL PALORINYA DUFILE (! PADIBE Kaabong LOBONGIA !( LUDARA !( !( PANYANGA !( !( NYOKE ABAKADYAK BUNGU !( OROM KAABONG! TC !( GIMERE LAROPI PADWAT EAST !( KERILA BIAFRA !( LONGIRA PENA MINIKI Aringa!( ROMOGI PALORINYA JIHWA !( LAMWO KULUYE KATATWO !( PIRE BAMURE ORINJI (! BARINGA PALABEK WANGTIT OKOL KINGABA !( LEGU MINIKI
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Uganda: an Assessment and Review
    Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2014, 6, 1297-1315 Published Online October 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jwarp http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2014.614120 Water Resources of Uganda: An Assessment and Review Francis N. W. Nsubuga1,2*, Edith N. Namutebi3, Masoud Nsubuga-Ssenfuma2 1Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa 2National Environmental Consult Ltd., Kampala, Uganda 3Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kampala, Uganda Email: *[email protected] Received 1 August 2014; revised 26 August 2014; accepted 18 September 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Water resources of a country constitute one of its vital assets that significantly contribute to the socio-economic development and poverty eradication. However, this resource is unevenly distri- buted in both time and space. The major source of water for these resources is direct rainfall, which is recently experiencing variability that threatens the distribution of resources and water availability in Uganda. The annual rainfall received in Uganda varies from 500 mm to 2800 mm, with an average of 1180 mm received in two main seasons. The spatial distribution of rainfall has resulted into a network of great rivers and lakes that possess big potential for development. These resources are being developed and depleted at a fast rate, a situation that requires assessment to establish present status of water resources in the country. The paper reviews the characteristics, availability, demand and importance of present day water resources in Uganda as well as describ- ing the various issues, challenges and management of water resources of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoima Profile.Indd
    Hoima District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profi le 2016 HOIMA DISTRICT HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE a Acknowledgment On behalf of Office of the Prime Minister, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to all of the key stakeholders who provided their valuable inputs and support to this Multi-Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability mapping exercise that led to the production of comprehensive district Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability (HRV) profiles. I extend my sincere thanks to the Department of Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Management, under the leadership of the Commissioner, Mr. Martin Owor, for the oversight and management of the entire exercise. The HRV assessment team was led by Ms. Ahimbisibwe Catherine, Senior Disaster Preparedness Officer supported by Mr. Odong Martin, Disaster Management Officer and the team of consultants (GIS/DRR specialists); Dr. Bernard Barasa, and Mr. Nsiimire Peter, who provided technical support. Our gratitude goes to UNDP for providing funds to support the Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Mapping. The team comprised of Mr. Steven Goldfinch – Disaster Risk Management Advisor, Mr. Gilbert Anguyo - Disaster Risk Reduction Analyst, and Mr. Ongom Alfred-Early Warning system Programmer. My appreciation also goes to Hoima District Team; 1. Mr. Luke L.L Lokuda – Chief Administrative Officer 2. Ms. Nyangoma Joseline – District Natural Resources Officer 3. Ms. Nsita Gertrude - District Environment Officer The entire body of stakeholders who in one way or another yielded valuable ideas and time to support the completion of this exercise. Hon. Hilary O. Onek Minister for Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Refugees HOIMA DISTRICT HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The multi-hazard vulnerability profile outputs from this assessment was a combination of spatial modeling using socio-ecological spatial layers (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Bird Areas in Uganda. Status and Trends 2008
    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS IN UGANDA Status and Trends 2008 NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Important Bird Areas in Uganda Status and Trends 2008 Compiled by: Michael Opige Odull and Achilles Byaruhanga Edited by: Ambrose R. B Mugisha and Julius Arinaitwe Map illustrations by: David Mushabe Graphic designs by: Some Graphics Ltd January 2009 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non commercial purposes is authorized without further written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Production of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written notice of the copyright holder. Citation: NatureUganda (2009). Important Bird Areas in Uganda, Status and Trends 2008. Copyright © NatureUganda – The East Africa Natural History Society About NatureUganda NatureUganda is a Non Governmental Organization working towards the conservation of species, sites and habitats not only for birds but other taxa too. It is the BirdLife partner in Uganda and a member of IUCN. The organization is involved in various research, conservation and advocacy work in many sites across the country. These three pillars are achieved through conservation projects, environmental education programmes and community involvement in conservation among others. All is aimed at promoting the understanding, appreciation and conservation of nature. For more information please contact: NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Plot 83 Tufnell Drive, Kamwokya. P.O.Box 27034, Kampala Uganda Email [email protected] Website: www.natureuganda.org DISCLAIMER This status report has been produced with financial assistance of the European Union (EuropeAid/ ENV/2007/132-278. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of Birdlife International and can under no normal circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Crime Report 2019 Public
    P ANDA OLIC UG E PR E OTE RV CT & SE P ANDA OLIC UG E PRO E TEC RV T & SE UGANDA POLICE Annual Crime Report 2019 Annual Crime Report - 2019 Page I 1 P ANDA OLIC UG E PR E OTE RV CT & SE POLICE DA AN G U E V R E C & S PROTE T Annual Crime Report 2019 Annual Crime Report - 2019 P ANDA OLIC UG E PR E OTE RV CT & SE Mandate The Uganda Police Force draws its mandate from the constitution of Uganda Chapter Twelve, Article 212 that stipulates the functions of the force as: (a) to protect life and property; (b) to preserve law and order; (c) to prevent and detect crime; and (d) to cooperate with the civilian authority and other security organs estab- lished under this Constitution and with the population generally. Vision “An Enlightened, Motivated, Community Oriented, Accountable and Modern Police Force; geared towards a Crime free society”. Mission “To secure life and property in a committed and Professional manner, in part- nership with the public, in order to promote development Annual Crime Report - 2019 P ANDA OLIC UG E PR E OTE RV CT & SE ADMINISTRATIVE AND PLANNING MACRO STRUCTURE FOR THE UGANDA POLICE FORCE ADMINISTRATIVE AND PLANNING MACRO STRUCTURE FOR THE UGANDA POLICE FORCE Inspector General of Police Police Authority Deputy Inspector General of Police Chief of Joint Staff Directorate of Police Fire Directorate of Human Rights Directorate of Operations Directorate of Traffic & Prevention and Rescue and Legal Services Road Safety Services Directorate of ICT Directorate of Counter Directorate of Police Health Directorate of INTERPOL
    [Show full text]
  • Kingfisher Oil Development Surface Water
    October 2017 CNOOC UGANDA LIMITED KINGFISHER OIL PROJECT, HOIMA DISTRICT, UGANDA ‐ SURFACE WATER SPECIALIST REPORT VERSION Submitted to: The Executive Director National Environment Management Authority, NEMA House, Plot 17/19/21 Jinja Road, P. O. Box 22255 Kampala, Uganda READY VOLUME 4, STUDY 2 4, STUDY VOLUME – PRINT FINAL Report Number: 1776816‐321512‐13 REPORT Distribution: 1 x electronic copy CNOOC Uganda Limited 1 x electronic copy NEMA 1 x electronic copy Eco & Partner 1 x electronic copy Golder SURFACE WATER SPECIALIST REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents hydrology baseline information and an impact assessment of surface water hydrology affected by the Project. An understanding of surface water hydrological conditions prior to mine oil and gas development is essential to assess changes in water availability that could affect local users. Changes in hydrology can also affect water quality and other resources such as fish habitat, vegetation and wildlife. Hydrological data is further required to design mine oil and gas facilities (e.g. culverts, channels and storage ponds). The regional climate in the area is described as tropical with a distinct wet and dry season. Rainfall over the study area catchment varies between 700 mm and 1 400 mm/ annum. Results of Global Climate Change models indicate that Uganda is likely to experience more extreme periods of intense rainfall and drought, while the rainfall seasons become more erratic and/or infrequent. The project site is located within the Kingfisher catchment and drains westwards into the south eastern embankments of Lake Albert. Kingfisher catchment is associated with a very high western rift escarpment that drains into Lake Albert via several scattered streams and wetlands flowing westwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Uganda
    AFB.PPRC.27-28.2 AFB/PPRC.26-27/2 21 June 2021 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee PROPOSAL FOR UGANDA AFB/PPRC.27-28/2 Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines (OPG) for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund (the Fund), adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board), state in paragraph 45 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one-step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two-step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the endorsement of the Board. In the second step, the fully-developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would ultimately require the Board’s approval. 2. The Templates approved by the Board (Annex 5 of the OPG, as amended in March 2016) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents List of Tables
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 PROJECT IMPACTS ................................................................................................................ 138 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 138 Summary of Impacts ................................................................................................................. 138 Impacts on Land ....................................................................................................................... 143 6.3.1 Land Requirements and Land Use Context ......................................................................... 143 Impacts on houses – Physical Displacement ........................................................................... 149 Impacts on other structures ...................................................................................................... 153 Impacts on Communal Buildings .............................................................................................. 159 Graves and Cultural Heritage Assets ....................................................................................... 160 Impacts on Crops and Economic Trees .................................................................................... 160 Impacts on Livelihood Activities – Economic Displacement ..................................................... 166 Impacts on Public Utilities/Infrastructure ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legend " Wanseko " 159 !
    CONSTITUENT MAP FOR UGANDA_ELECTORAL AREAS 2016 CONSTITUENT MAP FOR UGANDA GAZETTED ELECTORAL AREAS FOR 2016 GENERAL ELECTIONS CODE CONSTITUENCY CODE CONSTITUENCY CODE CONSTITUENCY CODE CONSTITUENCY 266 LAMWO CTY 51 TOROMA CTY 101 BULAMOGI CTY 154 ERUTR CTY NORTH 165 KOBOKO MC 52 KABERAMAIDO CTY 102 KIGULU CTY SOUTH 155 DOKOLO SOUTH CTY Pirre 1 BUSIRO CTY EST 53 SERERE CTY 103 KIGULU CTY NORTH 156 DOKOLO NORTH CTY !. Agoro 2 BUSIRO CTY NORTH 54 KASILO CTY 104 IGANGA MC 157 MOROTO CTY !. 58 3 BUSIRO CTY SOUTH 55 KACHUMBALU CTY 105 BUGWERI CTY 158 AJURI CTY SOUTH SUDAN Morungole 4 KYADDONDO CTY EST 56 BUKEDEA CTY 106 BUNYA CTY EST 159 KOLE SOUTH CTY Metuli Lotuturu !. !. Kimion 5 KYADDONDO CTY NORTH 57 DODOTH WEST CTY 107 BUNYA CTY SOUTH 160 KOLE NORTH CTY !. "57 !. 6 KIIRA MC 58 DODOTH EST CTY 108 BUNYA CTY WEST 161 OYAM CTY SOUTH Apok !. 7 EBB MC 59 TEPETH CTY 109 BUNGOKHO CTY SOUTH 162 OYAM CTY NORTH 8 MUKONO CTY SOUTH 60 MOROTO MC 110 BUNGOKHO CTY NORTH 163 KOBOKO MC 173 " 9 MUKONO CTY NORTH 61 MATHENUKO CTY 111 MBALE MC 164 VURA CTY 180 Madi Opei Loitanit Midigo Kaabong 10 NAKIFUMA CTY 62 PIAN CTY 112 KABALE MC 165 UPPER MADI CTY NIMULE Lokung Paloga !. !. µ !. "!. 11 BUIKWE CTY WEST 63 CHEKWIL CTY 113 MITYANA CTY SOUTH 166 TEREGO EST CTY Dufile "!. !. LAMWO !. KAABONG 177 YUMBE Nimule " Akilok 12 BUIKWE CTY SOUTH 64 BAMBA CTY 114 MITYANA CTY NORTH 168 ARUA MC Rumogi MOYO !. !. Oraba Ludara !. " Karenga 13 BUIKWE CTY NORTH 65 BUGHENDERA CTY 115 BUSUJJU 169 LOWER MADI CTY !.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification, Characterisation And
    IDENTIFICATION, CHARACTERISATION AND MAPPING OF FISH BREEDING AREAS ON LAKES EDWARD AND ALBERT NELSAP Technical Reports: Basin Development Series 2020 - 03 JUNE 2020 Multinational Lakes Edward And Albert Integrated Fisheries And Water Resources Management (LEAF II) Project Identification, Characterisation And Mapping Of Fish Breeding Areas On Lakes Edward And Albert Report was Prepared by the National Fisheries Resources Research Institute (NAFIRRI) - Uganda and the Centre for Research in Hydrology (CRH) - Uvira, D.R Congo for the Nile Equatorial Lakes Subsidiary Action Program (NELSAP-CU) / Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) AUGUST 2019 The purpose of the technical report series is to support informed stakeholder dialogue and decision making in order to achieve sustainable socio-economic development through equitable utilization of, and benefit from, the shared Nile Basin water resources. Project: Multinational Lakes Edward And Albert Integrated Fisheries And Water Resources Management (LEAF II) Project Funding Source: The African Development Bank (AfDB) and Global Environment Facility (GEF) Project Number: Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of NBI’s Member States or its development partners. Trademark names and symbols are used in an editorial fashion and no intention of infringement on trade mark or copyright laws. While every care has been exercised in compiling and publishing the information and data contained in this document, the NBI regrets any errors or omissions that may have been unwittingly made in this publication. The NBI is not an authority on International Administrative Boundaries. All country boundaries used in this publication are based on FAO Global Administrative Unit Layers (GAUL). © 2018 Nile Equatorial Lakes Subsidiary Action Program (NELSAP-CU) / Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]