DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Full Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Full Report How Iran exports its ideology “We shall export our revolution to the whole world. Until the cry ‘there is no god but God’ resounds over the whole world, there will be struggle.” – Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini December 2020 Table of Contents About the Author .................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Profiles of Institutions Spreading Iran’s Revolution Abroad ................................................................... 6 Universities ..............................................................................................................................6 Al-Mustafa International University ................................................................................................. 6 Islamic Azad University .................................................................................................................... 8 Charitable Organizations ........................................................................................................ 10 Imam Khomeini Relief Committee .................................................................................................. 10 Ahlul Bayt World Assembly ............................................................................................................ 12 Iran’s Media Empire ............................................................................................................... 13 Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting ............................................................................................. 14 Al-Alam .......................................................................................................................................... 16 PressTV .......................................................................................................................................... 17 HispanTV ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Government Sponsored Initiatives ........................................................................................... 19 Khatam al-Anbiya .......................................................................................................................... 19 Quds Day ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Tehran International Book Fair ....................................................................................................... 24 Iran’s Ideological Expansion – Middle East ........................................................................................... 25 Iranian Influence in Lebanon: The Hezbollah model ....................................................................... 26 Export of the Hezbollah Model ................................................................................................ 29 Syria .............................................................................................................................................. 35 Yemen ........................................................................................................................................... 38 Afghanistan ................................................................................................................................... 39 Palestinian Territories .................................................................................................................... 40 Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) ...................................................................................................... 42 Iran’s Ideological Expansion – Latin America ........................................................................................ 45 Nuts and Bolts of Iran’s Ideological Expansion in Latin America ............................................... 46 Mohsen Rabbani: Iran’s Principal Proselytizer in Latin America ................................................ 47 Rabbani’s Disciples: Ongoing efforts to spread Iran’s revolutionary ideology in Latin America 51 Iran’s Ideological Expansion – Africa ..................................................................................................... 54 Nigeria ................................................................................................................................... 55 2 Senegal .................................................................................................................................. 59 Kenya ..................................................................................................................................... 61 South Africa ........................................................................................................................... 62 Iran’s Ideological Expansion – Europe ................................................................................................... 64 Germany ................................................................................................................................ 65 United Kingdom (U.K.) ............................................................................................................ 68 Italy ....................................................................................................................................... 70 Belgium .................................................................................................................................. 70 The Balkans ............................................................................................................................ 71 3 About the Author Jordan Steckler is currently a Research Analyst at United Against a Nuclear Iran. Previously, he served as a Senior Research Analyst at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) from 2012-2017, where he focused primarily on Iran’s nuclear program and destabilizing regional activities. Mr. Steckler holds both an M.A. and B.A. in Middle Eastern Studies from George Washington University. Introduction Since the 1979 establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Iranian regime has sought to export its revolutionary ideology in an effort to establish Iranian hegemony in the Islamic world. American diplomat Henry Kissinger has remarked on several occasions that Iran needs to decide “whether it wants to be a nation or a cause.” In fact, the need to spread the Islamic Revolution beyond Iran’s borders is ingrained in the principles of Khomeinism, Iran’s guiding ethos. In the words of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic, “We shall export our revolution to the whole world. Until the cry ‘there is no god but God’ resounds over the whole world, there will be struggle.” Khomeinism is a radical Shi’a Islamist ideology that fuses religion and governance, utilizing the principle of velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the Islamic jurist) to endow a learned Islamic jurist with the role of Supreme Leader who holds final religious and political authority over all affairs of state. Under Iran’s revolutionary system, velayat-e faqih is invoked to demand loyalty to and justify the authoritarian role of the Supreme Leader based on divine right. The other defining principle of Iran’s Khomeinist ideology is a conspiratorial outlook and enmity toward the West, particularly the United States which is still frequently referred to as the Great Satan. Iran has framed its Islamic Revolution as a supranational liberation movement of oppressed Muslims from “arrogant” colonialist powers who seek to subjugate Islam. Article 154 of Iran’s constitution explicitly states that the Islamic Republic “supports the just struggles of the mustad'afun [oppressed] against the mustakbirun [tyrants] in every corner of the globe.” Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, explained Iran’s sense of grievance toward the U.S. in a June 12, 2017 speech: “Basically, many of our issues with America are not solvable. The reason is that America’s problem with us is us, the Islamic Republic! The problem is this. … The problem of the US is the essence of the Islamic Republic. That a government and a political system comes into being in an important country like Iran and in a rich land called Iran which takes no heed of the yeas and nays of a power like the US and which says yes and no whenever it likes is very difficult for them to tolerate. … How do you want to “resolve” this opposition? Therefore, our problems with the US are insolvable. Their problem is with the essence of the Islamic Republic itself.” 4 Iran has pursued a two-pronged approach, encompassing hard and soft power strategies, in order to spread its brand of Islamic fundamentalist ideology throughout the Middle East and beyond. In terms of hard power, Iran has offered financial, ideological, and material support for global terrorist proxies loyal to Iran’s supreme leader. Iran’s backing of terrorist movements has helped Iran establish spheres of influence throughout the region, including in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the Palestinian territories. An extensive analysis of Iran’s support for terrorist proxies can be found here, and a timeline of Iran’s state sponsorship of terrorism in pursuit of its revolutionary goals
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MIRD Thesis Full Draft
    Jihadi Terrorists In Europe: Their Characteristics and Their Recruitment Circumstances in the 21st Century Monday, May 23rd 2016 MSc Thesis Pietro Moro First Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Hosli, Madeleine Second Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Bakker, Edwin MSc International Relations & Diplomacy Leiden University The Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael Acknowledgements Apart from the research that was conducted since January 2016, this thesis is the product of two years of academic guidance inspired to me by the MSc program in International Relations and Diplomacy by Leiden University, and the Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael. Furthermore, in the previous year I had the opportunity to refine my research and analytical skills at the Institute of Security and Global Affairs. Therefore, I would like to especially thank Dr. Madeleine Hosli and Dr. Edwin Bakker for shepherding me throughout this time, and who have been kind enough to supervise my academic growth and the process leading up to this thesis. My gratitude also goes to the researchers at the Institute of Security and Global Affairs for helping me with a few of the unexpected intricacies that arose while writing this thesis. I would also like to thank my friends for helping translate the multitude of sources written in different languages, and my family for their support and patience in the culmination of my studies. !2 of 73! Abstract Figure 1: Cases of Jihadi Terrorism in the European Union (2010-2015). Globally, since the beginning of the 21st century, there has been over a nine-fold increase in the number of deaths from terrorism, rising from 3,329 in 2000 to 32,685 in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Iranian Terror and Its Threat to the U.S. Homeland
    THE FUTURE OF IRANIAN TERROR AND ITS THREAT TO THE U.S. HOMELAND HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 11, 2016 Serial No. 114–53 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 21–525 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas, Chairman LAMAR SMITH, Texas BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi PETER T. KING, New York LORETTA SANCHEZ, California MIKE ROGERS, Alabama SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan, Vice Chair JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina BRIAN HIGGINS, New York TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana LOU BARLETTA, Pennsylvania WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania DONALD M. PAYNE, JR., New Jersey CURT CLAWSON, Florida FILEMON VELA, Texas JOHN KATKO, New York BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey WILL HURD, Texas KATHLEEN M. RICE, New York EARL L. ‘‘BUDDY’’ CARTER, Georgia NORMA J. TORRES, California MARK WALKER, North Carolina BARRY LOUDERMILK, Georgia MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas DANIEL M. DONOVAN, JR., New York BRENDAN P. SHIELDS, Staff Director JOAN V. O’HARA, General Counsel MICHAEL S. TWINCHEK, Chief Clerk I. LANIER AVANT, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE PETER T.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Extending Influence in the Western Hemisphere
    THREAT TO THE HOMELAND: IRAN’S EXTENDING INFLUENCE IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 9, 2013 Serial No. 113–24 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 85–689 PDF WASHINGTON : 2014 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas, Chairman LAMAR SMITH, Texas BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi PETER T. KING, New York LORETTA SANCHEZ, California MIKE ROGERS, Alabama SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia YVETTE D. CLARKE, New York CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan, Vice Chair BRIAN HIGGINS, New York PATRICK MEEHAN, Pennsylvania CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania RON BARBER, Arizona JASON CHAFFETZ, Utah DONDALD M. PAYNE, JR., New Jersey STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi BETO O’ROURKE, Texas LOU BARLETTA, Pennsylvania TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii CHRIS STEWART, Utah FILEMON VELA, Texas RICHARD HUDSON, North Carolina STEVEN A. HORSFORD, Nevada STEVE DAINES, Montana ERIC SWALWELL, California SUSAN W. BROOKS, Indiana SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania MARK SANFORD, South Carolina GREG HILL, Chief of Staff MICHAEL GEFFROY, Deputy Chief of Staff/Chief Counsel MICHAEL S. TWINCHEK, Chief Clerk I. LANIER AVANT, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina, Chairman PAUL C.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Ideological Expansion
    Iran’s Ideological Expansion “We shall export our revolution to the whole world. Until the cry ‘there is no god but God’ resounds over the whole world, there will be struggle.” – Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini June 2018 Table of Contents About the Author ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Profiles of Institutions Spreading Iran’s Revolution Abroad ...................................................................... 6 Universities .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Al-Mustafa International University ..................................................................................................... 6 Islamic Azad University ......................................................................................................................... 8 Charitable Organizations ..................................................................................................................... 10 Imam Khomeini Relief Committee ...................................................................................................... 11 Ahlul Bayt World Assembly ................................................................................................................. 13 Iran’s
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Militias in Iraq's Parliament: Political Outcomes and US Response
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 2979 Iranian Militias in Iraq's Parliament: Political Outcomes and U.S. Response by Phillip Smyth Jun 11, 2018 Also available in Arabic / Farsi ABOUT THE AUTHORS Phillip Smyth Phillip Smyth was a Soref Fellow at The Washington Institute from 2018-2021. Brief Analysis As Washington mulls sanctions on Asaib Ahl al-Haq and similar groups, it should mind the volatility of Baghdad’s near-term political situation and the questionable efficacy of ‘wing’ distinctions. mong the winners in Iraq’s May 12 parliamentary elections was Asaib Ahl al-Haq (AAH), the fastest-rising A faction in a powerful coalition of Iranian-allied Iraqi parties. In the days that followed, U.S. legislators passed an amended defense authorization bill that paved the way for the Treasury Department to impose heavy financial sanctions on the group and other accused Iranian proxies. Although this is the right step, any sanctions need to be carefully crafted and timed to avoid an anti-American backlash during Iraq’s already-chaotic government formation process. BREAKDOWN OF IRAN’S COALITION A AH is part of the Fatah (Conquest) Alliance, a coalition that won between forty and forty-seven seats last month, enough for second place among all contenders (pending the outcome of Iraq’s planned recount). AAH won at least thirteen of these seats, and perhaps as many as fifteen, or nearly 30 percent of the alliance’s total. Fatah is led by Hadi al-Ameri of the Badr Organization, arguably the oldest, largest, and most important of the Iraqi Shia groups ideologically, politically, and religiously subservient to Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • IRIS:KAS Report
    The Failure of Reconstruction in Mosul: Root Causes from 2003 to the Post-ISIS Period Zmkan Ali Saleem & Mac Skelton IRIS Policy Report 0 (Modified Reprint) The Failure of Reconstruction in Mosul: Root Causes from 2003 to the Post-ISIS Period **This reprint (released June 10, 2020) is a modified and updated excerpt of an October 2019 IRIS/KAS publication entitled “Mosul and Basra after the Protests: The Roots of Government Failure and Popular Discontent.”** The Institute of Regional and International Studies (IRIS) is a policy research center based at the American University of Iraq, Sulaimani (AUIS). Through multidisciplinary research, training programs, and policy forums, IRIS addresses the most complex issues facing Iraq and the Middle East. The Institute is funded through grants from donor institutions and countries. Recently IRIS has partnered with the United Nations Assistance Mission in Iraq, London School of Economics, the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, & Chatham House on a variety of programs and research projects. The Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS) is a German political foundation whose civic education programs aim at promoting freedom and liberty, peace and justice. The KAS ` Syria/Iraq Office deals with the political and social situation in both countries, questions regarding the stability of the region, the refugee situation and security implications sdfgsdfg arising from the Syrian civil war and the emergence of the Islamic State. In addition to strengthening political dialogue within the region and between Europe and the Middle East, KAS work focuses on reconciliation and civil society support, good governance and rule of law, as well as research and analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • State Sponsor of Terror: the Global Threat of Iran
    State Sponsor of Terror: The Global Threat of Iran Statement before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade Ilan Berman Vice President American Foreign Policy Council February 11, 2015 Chairman Poe, distinguished members of the Subcommittee: It is an honor to appear before you today to discuss the global threat posed by the Islamic Republic of Iran. It is an issue that has received far too little attention over the past year-and-a-half. Since the start of negotiations between Iran and the P5+1 powers in November of 2013, the attention of the United States and its diplomatic partners has focused almost exclusively on one aspect of Iran’s activities, its nuclear program. For the Obama administration, reaching some sort of durable compromise with the Iranian regime over its nuclear ambitions has become an overriding objective. As Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes told a meeting of political activists in January of 2014, securing such a deal is considered by the White House to be as significant as its previous success on healthcare, the signature initiative of President Obama’s first term.1 Moreover, with the rise of the Islamic State terrorist group in Iraq, the White House has gravitated toward the notion that Iran also can serve as a constructive security partner. Administration officials have said that they see a role for Iran in the international coalition that Washington is now erecting,2 and tactical coordination between Tehran and Washington on combat operations is widely understood to be taking place.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 FILING of COMPLAINT His Honor the Federal Judge Dr. Ariel O. Lijo
    [insignia] Office of the Public Prosecutor of the Nation [signature] Alberto Nisman, Chief Prosecutor FILING OF COMPLAINT His Honor the Federal Judge Dr. Ariel O. Lijo ALBERTO NISMAN, Chief Prosecutor, head of the Unidad Fiscal de Investigación [Prosecutorial Investigation Unit] concerned with the attack carried out on July 18, 1994, against the headquarters of the AMIA [Asociación Mutual Israel Argentina – Argentine Israelite Mutual Aid Association] [cause 3446/2012, “Velazco, Carlos Alfredo et al. for abuse of power and breach of duty by a public official, in National Federal Criminal and Correctional Court No. 4, Clerk of Court No. 8] appears before you and respectfully states: I. Purpose In accordance with the legal mandate set forth in article 177 paragraph 1 of the National Code of Criminal Procedure, as representative of the Public Prosecutor’s Office responsible for the Investigation Unit concerned with the “AMIA” cause, I hereby file a complaint relating to the existence of a criminal plan aimed at according immunity to those individuals of Iranian nationality who have been accused in this cause in order for them to avoid investigation and be exonerated from the jurisdiction of the Argentine courts having competency in this case. This conspiracy has been orchestrated and implemented by senior figures in the Argentine national government with the collaboration of third parties in what constitutes a criminal acts defined, a priori, as the crimes of aggravated accessory after the fact through personal 1 influence, obstruction or interference with official procedure and breach of duty by a public official (art. 277 ¶¶ 1 and 3, art.
    [Show full text]
  • IRGC and Hezbollah
    Major Beneficiaries of the Iran Deal: IRGC and Hezbollah Dr. Matthew Levitt Fromer-Wexler Fellow and Director, Stein Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy Testimony submitted to the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East and North Africa September 17, 2015 Chairman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Ranking Member Deutch, and Members of the Committee, thank you for this opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the recent activities of two of the major beneficiaries of the Iran deal: Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC) and Lebanese Hezbollah, Iran's primary proxy active both as a regional militia and international terrorist group. Allow me to focus on Hezbollah. Iran is Hezbollah's primary benefactor, giving the Lebanese political party and militant group some $200 million a year in addition to weapons, training, intelligence, and logistical assistance. Over the past eighteen months, however, Iran has cut back its financial support to Hezbollah—a collateral benefit of the unprecedented international sanctions regime targeting Iran's nuclear program, as well as the fall in oil prices. The cutback has mostly curtailed Hezbollah's political, social, and military activities inside Lebanon. Its social- service institutions have cut costs, employees have received paychecks late or been laid off, and funding for civilian organizations, such as the group's satellite television station, al-Manar, has been reduced. By contrast, Hezbollah's Syria command, which has been a priority for Tehran given its commitment to defending Bashar al-Assad's regime, has shown no sign of financial hardship. As a result of the sanctions relief due Tehran under the Iran deal, Hezbollah expects additional funds will come its way, which will enable Hezbollah to push back against Lebanese political and social movements that are uncomfortable with its intervention in Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham", Perspectives Onterrorism, Vol 6, No 11 (2017)
    Konrad English book 5.qxd 6/29/2018 10:22 AM Page 1 From Jabhat al-Nusra to Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham: Evolution, Approach and Future Aymen Jawad al-Tamimi Konrad English book 5.qxd 6/29/2018 10:22 AM Page 2 Konrad English book 5.qxd 6/29/2018 10:22 AM Page 3 Abstract: This paper focuses on the history and evolution of the group Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, beginning from its formation as the al-Qaeda affiliate Jabhat al-Nusra, to Jabhat Fatah al- Sham and, finally, the present form of Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham. Based on testimonies from high-ranking operatives, the article discusses the complex relationship of Jabhat al-Nusra, Jabhat Fatah al-Sham and Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham to al-Qaeda during the transformation and rebranding process. In addition, the paper examines how Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham operates on the ground, including relations with other factions and the approach adopted towards governance. Finally, the paper sheds light on the current state and future of Hay'at Tahrir al- Sham in the Syrian insurgency. Despite Hay'at Tahrir al- Sham's pre-eminent position in the remaining insurgent-held territories, the success and future viability of this project are highly questionable, particularly in light of its commitment to form a unified front for the insurgency and to push for a polit- ical revolution inside Syria. Konrad English book 5.qxd 6/29/2018 10:22 AM Page 4 N.B.: The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the official opin- ion of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung or the Al-Nahrain Center for Strategic Studies opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Bucuresti, 15 Septembrie 2008
    שגריר ישראל AMBASSADOR OF ISRAEL 8.02.2013 Hezbollah, a security threat to Europe The conclusions of the official investigation of the Bulgarian Government into the 18 July 2012 Burgas bus bombing are clear: the terrorist organization Hezbollah was directly responsible. The terrorist attack in Burgas, which killed five innocent Israelis and a Bulgarian citizen and wounded more than 100 people was not an isolated incident, but one element in a worldwide terrorist campaign conducted by Iran and its proxy Hezbollah. In fact, the Bulgarian report provides proof that Hezbollah is engaged in terrorist activities across Europe. Its intention to strike on European soil was evident when a similar plot was thwarted in Cyprus 11 days prior to the Burgas attack. Terrorism has no boundaries and the time has come for the European Union to recognize Hezbollah as a terrorist organization and place it on its official list of terrorist entities. This decision would be an important step in the fight against terrorism, as it would provide the legal basis for closer monitoring of Hezbollah’s international activity and infrastructure, as well as placing pressure on the financial dealings and criminal activities which enable its terrorist attacks. This would lay the groundwork for preventing future Hezbollah strikes against innocent civilians of EU Member States, including Romanian citizens. The hesitation of some European governments to declare Hezbollah a security threat is based on a misunderstanding of the nature of the group. Despite the fact that it holds seats in the Lebanese government, it is a single, unified organization with a single leader, Hassan Nasrallah, who controls both terrorist actions and those "civilian" activities which serve to bolster support for the terrorists.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Global Jihad (July 29 – August 4, 2021)
    ( רמה כ ז מל ו תשר מה ו ד י ע י ן ( למ מ"ל ןיעידומ ש ל מ כרמ ז מה י עד מל ו ד י ע י ן ו רטל ו ר ט ןיעידומ ע ה ר Spotlight on Global Jihad July 29 – August 4, 2021 Main events of the past week Syria: There was a decrease in ISIS’s activity this week. In the Idlib region, in the rebel enclave, exchanges of artillery fire continued between the Syrian army and the forces supporting it, and the rebel forces. Russia provided air support. Following the pullback of the US forces from Syria and Iraq, a senior official in the Biden administration, who asked to remain anonymous, said that about 900 US troops would remain in Syria to continue supporting and advising the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), who are fighting against ISIS. Iraq: This week, there was a decrease in ISIS’S activity in Iraq as well. In the Salah al-Din and Diyala provinces, where ISIS’s activity was concentrated this week, several attacks were carried out against the Iraqi security forces and the organizations supporting them. Despite the pullback of US forces from Iraq, the US Ambassador to Iraq announced that the United States would continue to assist Iraq, as part of the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, until its defeat. According to him, assistance to the Iraqi army is essential not only for Iraq but also for the United States, because it prevents the resurgence of ISIS. According to Tahsin al- Khafaji, spokesman for the Iraqi Joint Operations Command, the Iraqi security forces need further support in order to improve both their capabilities and the equipment to be used in the war against ISIS.
    [Show full text]