DOCSLIB.ORG

December 1976

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
December 1976 \ 004rn ') 40017ay I !/P.L. 86_ 3 , TOP SECRET lll£iJ'ilUl1Jlll£iJl1 f:5l!~C!JCEU'il~ UJ~l!lll~~ crmwv CDlUDWCDl5 CD11 Wl5UJl!ll5 f OOUJW~l1£il~[!) HANDLE VIA COMINT CHANNELS ONLY JP.L. 86-36 I ~ ~H~R~~~~~~G d~i~~rI~~N~~~~ioN::::::::::::: J r:: :[::: ~ WHY CAN'T THEY DESIGN A GOOD S.R. TEST? .••• Kathy Bjorklund •.. 1 .... 7 NON-NAMES IN THE NEWS (COOPERPERSON) ••••••••.••••..••••.•••. /; •••. 8 APOLLO-SOYUZ: BEHIND-THE-SCENES ACTIVITY .•. ·1 I" .... 9 LET'S GIVE LINGUISTS A BIGGER PIECE OF PIE! • •.> .... 13 WHAT I s IN A NAME ? . • . • . • . • . • . • . • q •••• 1 5 GEOGRAPHIC NAMES........................... : ...• 16 LETTER TO THE EDITOR ..•.•.•..•...•.•.•..•...••••.•••••••••••••.•• 21 THIS BeetJMENT €6NftlNS €6BIW61tD l'tlATlltlAt EU d'e• 111 l>l&NS1tf'1N'1liH!l (NSA;'G8SM ta I~ Kile••'••• G98; HQ 1166!, €ale1WJ ! TOP SECRET Btdawif7 Gpea Netileatiea 117 tlte 91iftia1tw - eclassified and Approved for Release by NSA on -10--1-1-::0-1.:: pursuant to E.O. '135.26. vl DR Case # 54 778 DOCID: 4009781 'f OP SECRB'f Published Monthly by Pl, Techniques and Standards, for the Personnel of Operations .. VOL. III, No. 12 DECEMBER 1976 PUBLISHER WILLIAM LUTWINIAK BOARD OF EDITORS Editor in Chief •............ Arthur J. Salemme (5642s) ········-········.. ••·,.. :•"'''' Collection ........•......... I l(8955s)·· ·· ····· ·· · · P . L . 86-36 Cryptanalysis .. ............ ';:I====~l - {80255) · · ··· · Language ..........•......... Emery W. Tetrault (5236s) Machine Support ................I__________ ....k332ls) Mathematics ....•...•.....•.. Reed Dawson (3957s) Special Research . .......... Vera R. Filby (7119s) Traffic Analysis ............ Frederic 0. Mason, Jr. (4142s) Production Manager ........•. Harry Goff (4998s) For individual subscriptions send name and organizational designator to: CRYPTOLOG, Pl TOP SECRET DOCID: 4 09~9781 r..v~ , , "'"'± • \C) P.L. 86~36 'f Of' SECft:E'f UMBftA BUT IT LOOKS LIKE THE REAL THING ... IESS P.L. 86-36 December 76 * CRYPTOLOG * p age 1 EO 1. 4. ( c) TOP SECRET P.L. 86-36 IJM8R"lA DOCID: 4009781 EO 1. 4. ( c) 't'OF SECRECf UMBRA P.L. 86-36 December 76 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 2 Cf'OP SECRE'f UMBRA EO 1. 4. ( c) DOCID: 4009781 p,.L. 86-36 'f OP SECRE'f UMBRA December 76 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 3 TOP SECRET UMBRA EO 1. 4. ( c) DOCID: 4009781 'fOP SBCRB'f tJMBRA P .L. 86- 36 ·.. December 76 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 4 'fOP St3CRB'f UMBRA EO 1. 4. ( c) DOCID: 4009781 'f OP SECRBT UMHRJ.. P.L. 86-36 December 76 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 5 'fOP 8:13CR:l3T UMHIU.. Q_QCID: _400928--1 P ; L. 86- 36 UNCLASSIFIED uch of our work in the intelligence A little careful backgrounding community is, of necessity, denied cur­ quickly showed that Gino's restaurants rent widespread reporting. It thus may are owned by A & G Foods of King of be months, years, or even decades be­ Prussia, Penna. The obvious connection fore cryptanalysts at large learn of with A.G. Crypto of Zurich was immedi­ some of our most exciting efforts. How­ ately made, and the operation entered ever, a current operation is beginning, its second and more intensive phase. on which we are fortunate to be able to report. It is hoped that, by sharing At the risk of putting an agent in a these first efforts, we will enable pickle, it was determined that someone Agency analysts to read between the must infiltrate the organization. After lines of regular news reporting and carefully laying the groundwork, we were infer our (expected) successes. able to place an operative at the highest level of the organization. (See Fig. This juicy problem began a few years 2, black rectangle "to protect his ago when Gino's restaurants began an ad­ identity"). vertising campaign stressing "freedom of choice." It is well known that this is a We are now in the third phase of the code phrase for many right-wing, extremist project -- analyzing data and awaiting organizations, and the fact did not es­ further intelligence from our informant. cape the attention of high-level man­ The meat and (french-fried) potatoes agement. problem of understanding the intricate grill system has been turned over to a Wanting to get to the meat of the special team of Pl cryptomathematicians. , problem, operatives began a careful sur- . - veillance of selected restaurants. Then, However, the major burden rests with o· " several months ago, a crucial observa­ our i.ntrepid inte:loper -- to discover lh_·_ tion was made -- Gino the Genie Magic the big cheese behind the entire scheme~ \ :Kits were being sold at most local units. Barring some jam-up of data\ we hope to 1- -c) . · ' Upon purchase, it was discovered that issue future reports on this topical . ~- \: - each kit contained a message decoder :o - ~:. ccwd!!! (see Fig. 1). subject. · - ,---r-HE-G-1No-,s-G-EN-,E-o~llNEU"-'P MltGl~ ..... MESSAGE DECODER CARD 1 CARPET CLUB 0C)00000UUUG THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT IS A MEMBER IN GOOD uuouuGuuuu0 STANDING ANO DOES HEREBY PROMISE NEVER TO REVEAL THE SECRETS OF THE ANCIENT MYSTICAL MAGIC UUUUuvuUuuG FEATS AS EXPLAINED BY THE GINO'S GENIE' PLACE THE DECODER CARD OVER THE MAGIC MESSAGE AND INSTANTLY OECOOE THE HIDDEN WOR_DS OF THE GINO'S GENIE. December 76 * CRYPTOLOG * Page 6 UNCLASSIFIED DOCID: 4009781 00NPIBl3N~IAb WHY CAN'T THEY DES/Bii A GOOD S.R. TESTP Kathy Bjorklund, 6651 ~everal recently published articles on the designers of the various tests tried to examine testing process for professionalization have groups of aspirants for their knowledge of the cir­ prompted me to share my limited experience in cle, but found that the aspirants, despite a care­ that process in the Special Research (SR) field. ful culling that was done by evaluating the Pro­ In my brief exposure to education and testing fessional Qualification Records (PQRs), were methods during my undergraduate days, I learned equipped to deal with the rectangle, the square, or that the stress must always be placed upon goals even the parallelogram -- anything but the circle. or purposes. The goal must be defined ahead of The next step was to try to break down the time and, once defined, must be kept in mind testing method, further diluting it. The firmly and constantly. The principle is obvi­ aspirants would be given a chance to be tested ous: if a person is studying plane geometry, he on the general principles and the theorems in should not be tested on his abilities in solid Part I, and on the application of those princi­ geometry or trigonometry. If he is being taught ples in Part II. This may be a solution in ge­ certain theorems that apply to the circle, he ometry, but there is a good deal of controversy should be tested specifically on those theorems over whether or not this gauges the ability of and not as they apply to the rectangle, but a professional SRA. For, with the process to the circle. thus subdivided, the applicant no longer had to The idea that the testing of an aspirant in a demonstrate his ability in an overall manner . professional field at NSA should follow the same This, too, is a highly subjective area, since principle seems clear enough. The aspirant in many parts of the Agency the SRA's job has should learn certain techniques in his field, been broken down into several parts, whicn are should learn how to apply them, and should then not always handled by a single analyst. Although be tested specifically on those abilities. Sim­ this is an outgrowth issue of the general testing ple, isn't it? Not the rectangle, but the circle! problem, it too merits consideration for there Stick to the goal! has been -- like it or not, by choice or by chance -- a use of the SRA title as a coverall. That is all very well for Academia, where the Many individuals hold the title (and some even simplistic can be achieved, although it is often the certification) but have never written a couched in such ethereal terms that one outside report or do not exactly fit the definition of the hallowed halls could not recognize it as an SRA, which states that the primary duties of such. But can it be achieved in the workaday the SRA should include "intelligence research intelligence world? A glance through the appro­ and analysis and the preparation and presenta­ priate chapter of the Personnel Management Manual tion of written and/or oral reports, drawing, (Chapter 402.2, in case you want to read it your­ in both cases, from a thorough knowledge of self) would have us believe that it can. user requirements" (page 1, paragraph B of certi­ This is how it's done. A panel of profession­ fication criteria, as published by M3, 10 Novem­ als in the field is selected. They draw up the ber 1972). The test was trying to gauge ability professionalization/criteria reqµirements within to do the job as defined. What may have been the field, with the approval of M3. Under this overlooked was that many jobs did not conform to aegis falls any Professional Qualification Exami­ the definition. Perhaps by attempting to serve nation (PQE), which, in the SR field, has tradi­ the many, the procedure failed to single out tionally been a joint project carried out by the few who were qualified. Was this, or a panel subcononittee and the appropriate staff should it be, the goal? If so, is that goal from the National Cryptologic School. It still being met? Perhaps not. looks easy, doesn't it? Let's leave the world of circles and paral­ A sketchy review of the history of estab­ lelograms and get back to the business at hand lishing the criteria for the SR field quickly -- the SIGINT business.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View / Download
    www.arianespace.com www.starsem.com www.avio Arianespace’s eighth launch of 2021 with the fifth Soyuz of the year will place its satellite passengers into low Earth orbit. The launcher will be carrying a total payload of approximately 5 518 kg. The launch will be performed from Baikonur, in Kazakhstan. MISSION DESCRIPTION 2 ONEWEB SATELLITES 3 Liftoff is planned on at exactly: SOYUZ LAUNCHER 4 06:23 p.m. Washington, D.C. time, 10:23 p.m. Universal time (UTC), LAUNCH CAMPAIGN 4 00:23 a.m. Paris time, FLIGHT SEQUENCES 5 01:23 a.m. Moscow time, 03:23 a.m. Baikonur Cosmodrome. STAKEHOLDERS OF A LAUNCH 6 The nominal duration of the mission (from liftoff to separation of the satellites) is: 3 hours and 45 minutes. Satellites: OneWeb satellite #255 to #288 Customer: OneWeb • Altitude at separation: 450 km Cyrielle BOUJU • Inclination: 84.7degrees [email protected] +33 (0)6 32 65 97 48 RUAG Space AB (Linköping, Sweden) is the prime contractor in charge of development and production of the dispenser system used on Flight ST34. It will carry the satellites during their flight to low Earth orbit and then release them into space. The dedicated dispenser is designed to Flight ST34, the 29th commercial mission from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan performed by accommodate up to 36 spacecraft per launch, allowing Arianespace and its Starsem affiliate, will put 34 of OneWeb’s satellites bringing the total fleet to 288 satellites Arianespace to timely deliver the lion’s share of the initial into a near-polar orbit at an altitude of 450 kilometers.
    [Show full text]
  • 13Th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Going Viral 2021
    2021 13th International Conference on Cyber Confict: Going Viral T. Jančárková, L. Lindström, G. Visky, P. Zotz (Eds.) 2021 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER CONFLICT: GOING VIRAL Copyright © 2021 by NATO CCDCOE Publications. All rights reserved. IEEE Catalog Number: CFP2126N-PRT ISBN (print): 978-9916-9565-4-0 ISBN (pdf): 978-9916-9565-5-7 COPYRIGHT AND REPRINT PERMISSIONS No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence ([email protected]). This restriction does not apply to making digital or hard copies of this publication for internal use within NATO, or for personal or educational use when for non-proft or non-commercial purposes, providing that copies bear this notice and a full citation on the frst page as follows: [Article author(s)], [full article title] 2021 13th International Conference on Cyber Confict: Going Viral T. Jančárková, L. Lindström, G. Visky, P. Zotz (Eds.) 2021 © NATO CCDCOE Publications NATO CCDCOE Publications LEGAL NOTICE: This publication contains the opinions of the respective authors only. They do not Filtri tee 12, 10132 Tallinn, Estonia necessarily refect the policy or the opinion of NATO Phone: +372 717 6800 CCDCOE, NATO, or any agency or any government. NATO CCDCOE may not be held responsible for Fax: +372 717 6308 any loss or harm arising from the use of information E-mail: [email protected] contained in this book and is not responsible for the Web: www.ccdcoe.org content of the external sources, including external websites referenced in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume Xiv • Issue Iii
    Z cgai.ca CANADA’S CYBER SECURITY STRATEGY [P.12] PEACEKEEPING, PREPARE FOR WAR [P.16] DispatchThe FALL 2016 • VOLUME XIV • ISSUE III [P.6] FEATURED ARTICLE Source: Macleans ARE CANADA’S DIGITAL SECURITY POLICIES BEING DECIDED IN WASHINGTON? [P.10] September 2016 The Dispatch | 1 Published by the Canadian Global Affairs Institute Contributing Fellows: John Adams Jack Granatstein David Perry Stuart Beare Marius Grinius George Petrolekas David Bercuson Stéphanie von Hlatky Joël Plouffe Serge Bertrand Rolf Holmboe Andrew Rasiulis Jean-Christophe Boucher Rob Huebert Roy Rempel David Carment Thomas Juneau Colin Robertson Anthony Cary Tom Keenan Stephen Saideman Mark Collins Ferry de Kerckhove Hugh Segal Barry Cooper Whitney Lackenbauer Elinor Sloan Daryl Copeland Julian Lindley-French Gary Soroka Glenn Davidson Candice Malcolm Hugh Stephens Mike Day Randolph Mank Alan Stephenson Neil Desai Kyle Matthews Charity Weeden Paul Dewar David McLaughlin Chris Westdal Paul Durand Eric Miller Frédérick Gagnon Robert Muggah Prepared for the Canadian Global Affairs Institute 1600, 530 – 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8 www.cgai.ca ©2016 Canadian Global Affairs Institute| ISBN: 978-1-988493-04-6 2 | The Dispatch Volume XIV • Issue III September 2016 The Dispatch | 3 • Message from the Editor by DAVID BERCUSON COVER STORY Brexit, the Anglosphere and Canada by JULIAN LINDLEY-FRENCH The Obama Moment—Defence Spending Does Matter, eh! by ALAN STEPHENSON Are Canada’s Digital Security Policies Being Decided in Washington? by NEIL DESAI Canada’s Cyber Security
    [Show full text]
  • GLONASS Spacecraft
    INNO V AT IO N The task of designing and developing the GLONASS GLONASS spacecraft fell to the Scientific Production Association of Applied Mechan­ ics (Nauchno Proizvodstvennoe Ob"edinenie Spacecraft Prikladnoi Mekaniki or NPO PM) , located near Krasnoyarsk in Siberia. This major aero­ Nicholas L. Johnson space industrial complex was established in 1959 as a division of Sergei Korolev 's Kaman Sciences Corporation Expe1imental Design Bureau (Opytno Kon­ struktorskoe Byuro or OKB). (Korolev , among other notable achievements , led the Fourteen years after the launch of the effort to develop the Soviet Union's first first test spacecraft, the Russian Global Nav­ launch vehicle - the A launcher - which igation Satellite System (Global 'naya Navi­ placed Sputnik 1 into orbit.) The founding gatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema or and current general director and chief GLONASS) program remains viable and designer is Mikhail Fyodorovich Reshetnev, essentially on schedule despite the economic one of only two still-active chief designers and political turmoil surrounding the final from Russia's fledgling 1950s-era space years of the Soviet Union and the emergence program. of the Commonwealth of Independent States A closed facility until the early 1990s, (CIS). By the summer of 1994, a total of 53 NPO PM has been responsible for all major GLONASS spacecraft had been successfully Russian operational communications, navi­ Despite the significant economic hardships deployed in nearly semisynchronous orbits; gation, and geodetic satellite systems to associated with the breakup of the Soviet Union of the 53 , nearly 12 had been normally oper­ date. Serial (or assembly-line) production of and the transition to a modern market economy, ational since the establishment of the Phase I some spacecraft, including Tsikada and Russia continues to develop its space programs, constellation in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Praxis Manned Spaceflight Log 1961±2006
    Praxis Manned Space¯ight Log 1961±2006 Tim Furniss and David J. Shayler with Michael D. Shayler Praxis Manned Spaceflight Log 1961±2006 Published in association with PPraxisraxis PPublishiublishingng Chichester, UK Tim Furniss David J. Shayler Space¯ight Correspondent Astronautical Historian Flight International Astro Info Service Bideford Halesowen Devon West Midlands UK UK Michael D. Shayler Editor and Designer Astro Info Service Birmingham UK SPRINGER±PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION SUBJECT ADVISORY EDITOR: John Mason B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D. ISBN 10: 0-387-34175-7 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York ISBN 13: 978-0-387-34175-0 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Springer is part of Springer-Science + Business Media (springer.com) Library of Congress Control Number: 2006937359 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. # Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2007 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a speci®c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: Jim Wilkie Project Copy Editor: Mike Shayler Typesetting: Originator Publishing Services, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK Printed on acid-free paper Contents Authors' Preface ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecalc Current Space Demographics
    Spaceflight Now Current Space Demographics Post STS-100 Statistics SpaceCalc Current Space Demographics Post Soyuz Taxi Launch Rank Nation No. Records Days Flights Total Fliers 403 1 U.S. 253 Avdeyev 748 3 Men 366 2 USSR 72 V. Polyakov 679 2 Women 37 3 CIS 23 A. Solovyov 652 5 Total Tickets 884 4 Germany 9 Krikalev 624 5 5 France 8 Afanasayev 546 3 United States 253 5 Canada 8 Manarov 541 2 US Men 224 6 Japan 5 Viktorenko 489 4 US Women 29 7 Italy 3 Romanenko 430 3 8 Bulgaria 2 Volkov 392 3 Soviet Union 72 Afghanistan 1 V. Titov 387 4 USSR Men 70 Austria 1 Usachev 386 3 (in 4th) USSR Women 2 Belgium 1 Tsibliev 383 2 CIS 23 Britain 1 Kizim 375 3 CIS Men 22 Cuba 1 Serebrov 374 4 CIS Women 1 Czechoslovakia 1 Ryumin 372 4 Others 55 East Germany 1 Solovyev 362 2 Other Men 50 Hungary 1 Kaleri 343 3 Other Women 5 India 1 Lyakhov 333 3 Mexico 1 Gidzenko 319 2 Men with 6 flights 5 Mongolia 1 Women with 6 flights 0 Netherlands 1 YEARS 24 57 Men with 5 flights 14 North Vietnam 1 Women with 5 flights 6 Poland 1 U.S. Data Days Flights Men with 4 flights 41 Romania 1 Women with 4 flights 1 Saudi Arabia 1 Lucid 223 5 Men with 3 flights 66 Spain 1 Foale 168 5 Women with 3 flights 9 Switzerland 1 Thomas 163 3 Page 1 Spaceflight Now Current Space Demographics Post STS-100 Statistics All with 2 flights 100 Syria 1 Blaha 161 5 All with 1 flight 161 Slovakia 1 Shepherd 158 5 Linenger 143 2 TOTAL 403 TOTALS 29 403 Wolf 142 2 1 Flight 2 Flights 3 Flights 4 Flights 5 Flights 6 Flights Name Flts Sex-Nation 161 100 75 42 20 5 Acton, Loren 1 M-US STS-51F Adamson, James 2 M-US STS-28 STS-44 Afanasyev, Viktor 3 M-USSR TM-11 TM-18 TM-29 Akers, Thomas 4 M-US STS-41 STS-49 STS-61 STS-79 Akiyama, Toyohiro 1 M-Japan TM-11 Aksenov, Vladimir 2 M-USSR Soyuz 22 Soyuz T2 Aldrin, Edwin 2 M-US Gemini 12 Apollo 11 Alexandrov, Alexander 2 M-USSR Soyuz T9 TM-3 Alexandrov, Alexander 1 M-Bulgaria TM-5 Allen, Andrew 3 M-US STS-46 STS-62 STS-75 Allen, Joseph 2 M-US STS-5 STS-51A AlSaud, Sultan 1 M-S.
    [Show full text]
  • NANORACKS, LLC 555 Forge River Rd., Suite 120 Webster, TX 77598 4369 Phone: 832-632-7754 Fax: 832-575-4767
    NANORACKS, LLC 555 Forge River Rd., Suite 120 Webster, TX 77598 4369 Phone: 832-632-7754 Fax: 832-575-4767 www.nanoracks.com Contract Administrator: Christopher Cummins Email Address: [email protected] Business Size: Small For more information on ordering from Federal Supply Schedules click on the FSS Schedules button at fss.gsa.gov. TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPANY OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................................3 CUSTOMER INFORMATION .......................................................................................................5 GSA PRICELIST .............................................................................................................................8 SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS ..........................................................................................................13 NanoRacks, LLC 47QRAA18D004R 2 About NanoRacks NanoRacks was founded on the vision of building a business ecosystem in space. Our company has been integrating customer payloads for the International Space Station since our first launch in 2010. As of February 2018, we have integrated and operated over 600 payloads on 32 launches to the Space Station, including Shuttle, Antares/Cygnus, Atlas V/Cygnus, Falcon/Dragon, HTV, ATV, and Soyuz. To date, we have also deployed over 200 satellites into low-Earth orbit. NanoRacks comes with a team that has real hands on experience with payloads ranging from professional grade research to DOD to high school experiments. NanoRacks
    [Show full text]
  • Expedition 8 MISSION OVERVIEW
    Expedition 8 MISSION OVERVIEW To Improve Life Here, Science Comes to the Forefront To Extend Life to There, To Find Life Beyond. Experiments from earlier expeditions will Education Payload Operations (EPO) remain aboard the International Space include three educational activities that That is NASAs vision. Station (ISS), continuing to benefit from will focus on demonstrating science, long-term exposure to microgavity, and mathematics, technology, engineering or Michael Foale, additional studies in the life and physical geography principles. Expedition 8 Commander, NASA ISS sciences and space technology development Group Activation Packs -- YEAST will Science Officer: will be added. evaluate the role of individual genes in the When we look back fifty years to this time, we Most of the research complement for response of yeast to space flight conditions. wont remember the experiments that were Expedition 8 will be carried out with The results of this research could help performed, we wont remember the assembly scientific research facilities and samples clarify how mammalian cells grow under that was done, we may barely remember any already on board the Space Station. microgravity conditions and determine if individuals. What we will know was that countries Additional experiments are being evaluated genes are altered. came together to do the first joint international and prepared to take advantage of the Synchronized Position Hold, Engage, project, and we will know that that was the seed limited cargo space on the Soyuz or Reorient, Experimental Satellites that started us off to the moon and Mars. Progress vehicles. The research agenda for (SPHERES) will allow scientists to study the expedition remains flexible.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanoracks, LLC Commercial Contributions to the US ISS National Laboratory Biological Research Facilities
    NanoRacks, LLC Commercial Contributions to the US ISS National Laboratory Biological Research Facilities Michael D. Johnson1 NanoRacks, LLC , Webster, TX, 77598 Abstract. NanoRacks, LLC is a commercial space utilization company operating with the NASA ISS National Laboratory organization. The Company is developing a variety of capabilities and associated hardware (in collaboration with the WetLab team) to effectively utilize the ISS as an advanced biological research platform by leveraging off of recent advances in terrestrial biological research equipment. NanoRacks has flown miniature transmission and reflection microscopes and is flight hardening a state of the art off-the-shelf microplate spectrophotometer to take advantage of in- situ analysis on-board the ISS to reduce or eliminate sample return to Earth. NanoRacks has also developed and flown more conventional hardware that efficiently utilizes the current and future capsule based transportation systems to and from the ISS. This paper will provide a brief overview of NanoRacks’ hardware history and future plans. Keywords: NanoRacks, ISS, Research Facilities Nomenclature CU NanoRacks Cube Unit (10x10x10 cm, 1 kg) ISS International Space Station JEM Japanese Experiment Module NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration SBIR Small Business Innovative Research Ι. Introduction ASA’s International Space Station National Laboratory program and NanoRacks, LLC signed a NSpace Act Agreement on September 9, 2009 that started the commercial space efforts of NanoRacks. The mantra of NanoRacks is to reduce the cost and minimize the time required to fly items in space. As such, in the first two years of operations NanoRacks has launched two permanent facilities and thirteen different experiments on board the Shuttle, HTV, Soyuz and Progress spacecraft as well as returned payloads on the Shuttle and Soyuz.
    [Show full text]
  • Rex D. Hall and David J. Shayler
    Rex D. Hall and David J. Shayler Soyuz A Universal Spacecraft ruuiiMicPublishedu 11in1 aaaundiiuiassociationi witwimh ^^ • Springer Praxis Publishing PRHB Chichester, UK "^UF Table of contents Foreword xvii Authors' preface xix Acknowledgements xxi List of illustrations and tables xxiii Prologue xxix ORIGINS 1 Soviet manned spaceflight after Vostok 1 Design requirements 1 Sever and the 1L: the genesis of Soyuz 3 The Vostok 7/1L Soyuz Complex 4 The mission sequence of the early Soyuz Complex 6 The Soyuz 7K complex 7 Soyuz 7K (Soyuz A) design features 8 The American General Electric concept 10 Soyuz 9K and Soyuz 1 IK 11 The Soyuz Complex mission profile 12 Contracts, funding and schedules 13 Soyuz to the Moon 14 A redirection for Soyuz 14 The N1/L3 lunar landing mission profile 15 Exploring the potential of Soyuz 16 Soyuz 7K-P: a piloted anti-satellite interceptor 16 Soyuz 7K-R: a piloted reconnaissance space station 17 Soyuz VI: the military research spacecraft Zvezda 18 Adapting Soyuz for lunar missions 20 Spacecraft design changes 21 Crewing for circumlunar missions 22 The Zond missions 23 The end of the Soviet lunar programme 33 The lunar orbit module (7K-LOK) 33 viii Table of contents A change of direction 35 References 35 MISSION HARDWARE AND SUPPORT 39 Hardware and systems 39 Crew positions 40 The spacecraft 41 The Propulsion Module (PM) 41 The Descent Module (DM) 41 The Orbital Module (OM) 44 Pyrotechnic devices 45 Spacecraft sub-systems 46 Rendezvous, docking and transfer 47 Electrical power 53 Thermal control 54 Life support 54
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Space Program
    C05500088 TOP eEGRET iuf 3EEA~ NIE 11-1-71 THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM Declassified Under Authority of the lnteragency Security Classification Appeals Panel, E.O. 13526, sec. 5.3(b)(3) ISCAP Appeal No. 2011 -003, document 2 Declassification date: November 23, 2020 ifOP GEEAE:r C05500088 1'9P SloGRET CONTENTS Page THE PROBLEM ... 1 SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS l DISCUSSION 5 I. SOV.IET SPACE ACTIVITY DURING TfIE PAST TWO YEARS . 5 II. POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE PROSPECTS . 6 A. General ............................................. 6 B. Organization and Management . ............... 6 C. Economics .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. 8 III. SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL FACTORS ... 9 A. General .. .. .. .. .. 9 B. Launch Vehicles . 9 C. High-Energy Propellants .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 D. Manned Spacecraft . 12 E. Life Support Systems . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15 F. Non-Nuclear Power Sources for Spacecraft . 16 G. Nuclear Power and Propulsion ..... 16 Te>P M:EW TCS 2032-71 IOP SECl<ET" C05500088 TOP SECRGJ:. IOP SECREI Page H. Communications Systems for Space Operations . 16 I. Command and Control for Space Operations . 17 IV. FUTURE PROSPECTS ....................................... 18 A. General ............... ... ···•· ................. ····· ... 18 B. Manned Space Station . 19 C. Planetary Exploration . ........ 19 D. Unmanned Lunar Exploration ..... 21 E. Manned Lunar Landfog ... 21 F. Applied Satellites ......... 22 G. Scientific Satellites ........................................ 24 V. INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATION ............. 24 A. USSR-European Nations .................................... 24 B. USSR-United States 25 ANNEX A. SOVIET SPACE ACTIVITY ANNEX B. SOVIET SPACE LAUNCH VEHICLES ANNEX C. SOVIET CHRONOLOGICAL SPACE LOG FOR THE PERIOD 24 June 1969 Through 27 June 1971 TCS 2032-71 IOP SLClt~ 70P SECRE1- C05500088 TOP SEGR:R THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM THE PROBLEM To estimate Soviet capabilities and probable accomplishments in space over the next 5 to 10 years.' SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS A.
    [Show full text]
  • Building and Maintaining the International Space Station (ISS)
    / Building and maintaining the International Space Station (ISS) is a very complex task. An international fleet of space vehicles launches ISS components; rotates crews; provides logistical support; and replenishes propellant, items for science experi- ments, and other necessary supplies and equipment. The Space Shuttle must be used to deliver most ISS modules and major components. All of these important deliveries sustain a constant supply line that is crucial to the development and maintenance of the International Space Station. The fleet is also responsible for returning experiment results to Earth and for removing trash and waste from the ISS. Currently, transport vehicles are launched from two sites on transportation logistics Earth. In the future, the number of launch sites will increase to four or more. Future plans also include new commercial trans- ports that will take over the role of U.S. ISS logistical support. INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION GUIDE TRANSPORTATION/LOGISTICS 39 LAUNCH VEHICLES Soyuz Proton H-II Ariane Shuttle Roscosmos JAXA ESA NASA Russia Japan Europe United States Russia Japan EuRopE u.s. soyuz sL-4 proton sL-12 H-ii ariane 5 space shuttle First launch 1957 1965 1996 1996 1981 1963 (Soyuz variant) Launch site(s) Baikonur Baikonur Tanegashima Guiana Kennedy Space Center Cosmodrome Cosmodrome Space Center Space Center Launch performance 7,150 kg 20,000 kg 16,500 kg 18,000 kg 18,600 kg payload capacity (15,750 lb) (44,000 lb) (36,400 lb) (39,700 lb) (41,000 lb) 105,000 kg (230,000 lb), orbiter only Return performance
    [Show full text]