HOUSING in ROMANIA Project Co-Financed from the European Regional Development Fund Through the Operational Programme Technical Assistance (OPTA) 2007-2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HOUSING in ROMANIA Project Co-Financed from the European Regional Development Fund Through the Operational Programme Technical Assistance (OPTA) 2007-2013 Public Disclosure Authorized HOUSING IN ROMANIA Project co-financed from the European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Programme Technical Assistance (OPTA) 2007-2013 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TOWARDS A NATIONAL HOUSING STRATEGY Public Disclosure Authorized Regional Development Program 2 | Harmonizing Public Investments Component 4: FINAL REPORT (1) August 27, 2015 i ii Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................................................................. v Currency Equivalents ........................................................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................. viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 28 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................................... 28 1.2 Definitions ....................................................................................................................................................... 29 1.3 Report Structure........................................................................................................................................... 29 1.4 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 30 PART A: SITUATION ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................... 32 II. INSTITUTIONS, LAWS, AND GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS ....................................................... 33 2.1 Relevant stakeholders in the housing sector ................................................................................... 33 2.2 Legal framework and relevant laws ..................................................................................................... 38 2.3 Housing programs in Romania ............................................................................................................... 48 III. HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS ......................................................................................................... 52 3.1 Basic attributes ............................................................................................................................................. 52 3.2 Access to infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 61 3.3 Urban planning and infrastructure ...................................................................................................... 62 3.4 Exposure to natural hazards ................................................................................................................... 67 IV. HOUSING MARKET ............................................................................................................................. 71 4.1 Housing stock ................................................................................................................................................ 71 4.2 Market trends ................................................................................................................................................ 72 4.3 Housing finance ............................................................................................................................................ 80 4.4 Rental housing .............................................................................................................................................. 84 4.5 Heritage buildings and neighborhoods .............................................................................................. 87 4.6 Private developers ....................................................................................................................................... 89 4.7 Property valuation and taxation ............................................................................................................ 93 4.8 Land markets and property registration ........................................................................................... 94 4.9 Housing restitution ..................................................................................................................................... 95 V. HOUSING AFFORDABILITY .............................................................................................................. 97 5.1 Cost of living ................................................................................................................................................... 97 5.2 Price ................................................................................................................................................................... 98 5.3 Housing affordability ............................................................................................................................... 101 VI. HOUSING FOR THE POOR AND VULNERABLE ......................................................................... 108 iii 6.1 Overview on Social Marginalization and Housing Deprivation ............................................. 108 6.2 Strategic and Institutional Setting ..................................................................................................... 133 6.3 Review of Past and Current Initiatives ............................................................................................ 135 VII. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY ...................................... 139 7.1 Housing stock characteristics and energy consumption .......................................................... 139 7.2 Heating systems, tariffs, and “energy poverty” ............................................................................ 142 7.3 Mass thermal insulation programs .................................................................................................... 145 7.4 Other relevant EU-related initiatives ............................................................................................... 148 7.5 Financing for Energy Efficiency .......................................................................................................... 149 7.6 Market participants and capacity ....................................................................................................... 150 PART B: TOWARDS A HOUSING STRATEGY ............................................................................................. 152 VIII. KEY FINDINGS .................................................................................................................................... 153 8.1 Poor quality of existing housing ......................................................................................................... 158 8.2 Seismic risk .................................................................................................................................................. 159 8.3 Inadequate housing for poor and vulnerable groups ................................................................ 161 8.4 Inefficiencies in the housing market ................................................................................................. 164 8.5 Inadequate legal and institutional framework ............................................................................. 167 8.6 Public housing assistance not targeted or prioritized ............................................................... 168 IX. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................. 178 9.1 Legal Reform ............................................................................................................................................... 180 9.2 Institutional Reform ................................................................................................................................ 185 9.3 Financing ...................................................................................................................................................... 189 9.4 Urgently initiate seismic retrofitting of structurally unsafe residential buildings ........ 195 9.5 Prioritize improvement of old housing and neighborhoods .................................................. 197 9.6 Prioritize housing assistance to the poor and vulnerable ....................................................... 201 9.7 Improve the social housing program ................................................................................................ 206 9.8 Leverage private sector for affordable housing production ................................................... 208 9.9 Improve the current thermal insulation program ...................................................................... 216 Bibliography ...................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Country Report Romania 2020
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.2.2020 SWD(2020) 522 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Country Report Romania 2020 Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK AND THE EUROGROUP 2020 European Semester: Assessment of progress on structural reforms, prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances, and results of in-depth reviews under Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 {COM(2020) 150 final} EN EN CONTENTS Executive summary 4 1. Economic situation and outlook 9 2. Progress with country-specific recommendations 17 3. Summary of the main findings from the MIP in-depth review 21 4. Reform priorities 25 4.1. Public finances and taxation 25 4.2. Financial sector 30 4.3. Labour market, education and social policies 33 4.4. Competitiveness, reforms and investment 45 4.5. Environmental Sustainability 63 Annex A: Overview Table 67 Annex B: Commission debt sustainability analysis and fiscal risks 75 Annex C: Standard Tables 76 Annex D: Investment guidance on Just Transition Fund 2021-2027 for Romania 82 Annex E: Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 85 References 90 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: Key economic and financial indicators 16 Table 2.1: Assessment of 2019 CSR implementation 19 Table 3.1: MIP assessment matrix (*) - Romania 2020 23 Table C.1: Financial market indicators 76 Table C.2: Headline Social Scoreboard indicators 77 Table C.3: Labour market and education indicators 78 Table C.4: Social inclusion and health
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Financial Highlights EN December
    NEWS Romanian Financial Highlights – December 2012 Currency quotations Foreign exchange rates BNR base interest December 31, 2012 Quotation Date RON/EUR RON/USD Date Inflation rate % rate EUR/USD 1,32 21.dec 4,4451 3,3636 oct.12 0,29 Oct 5.25% USD/JPY 0,86 24.dec 4,4231 3,3468 nov.12 0,04 Nov 5.25% GBP/USD 1,62 27.dec 4,4296 3,3384 dec.12 0,60 Dec 5.25% USD/CHF 0,92 28.dec 4,4291 3,3619 2011 5,79 EUR/CHF 1,21 31.dec 4,4287 3,3575 2012 4,95 Source: National Bank of Romania, National Institute of Statistics RON/USD Evolution of National Currency (2010-2012) Evolution of national Currency (last month) - RON/EUR Evolution of national Currency (last month) - RON/USD RON/EUR 4,7 4,6800 3,5500 4,6400 4,2 3,4800 4,6000 4,5600 3,4100 3,7 4,5200 3,3400 4,4800 3,2 3,2700 4,4400 4,4000 3,2000 2,7 c c c c c c c 1 2 2 ec ec ec ec ec ec e e ec ec ec ec ec ec ec ec -10 11 -11 -11 -1 -11 12 -12 12 -12 -12 -1 12 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D b-11 r- n ct b-12 n g-1 p ct v- -De -D -De - -De ec Jan-11 e pr Ju Jul-11 Jan- e pr ay- Ju Jul-12 u e 1-Dec 3- 5-Dec 7-Dec 9-Dec 9-De 1- 3 5- 7- 9-Dec 9-De D F Ma A May-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 O Nov Dec-11 F Mar-12 A M A S O No Dec-12 11- 13- 15 17- 1 21 23-Dec 25 27-Dec 29- 31-Dec 11-Dec 13-Dec 15- 17-Dec 19- 21- 23- 25- 27- 2 31 Deposits interest Futures quotations BMFMS 1) Futures quotations BMFMS Maturity Interest Interest Contract Maturity Amount Contract Maturity Amount ROBID ROBOR RON RON 1 month 5,54% 6,04% EUR/RON mar.13 4,5050 DESNP mar.13 0,4315 3 months 5,55% 6,05% EUR/RON iun.13 4,5500 DETLV mar.13 0,8715 6 months
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on Real Estate Perspective Concerning the Socially Deprived
    Organizational and Economic Aspects of Housing Management in Deprived Areas Gunnar Blomé Stockholm 2011 Building and Real Estate Economics Department of Real Estate and Construction Management School of Architecture and the Built Environment Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) 1 © Gunnar Blomé 2011 Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Building and Real Estate Economics Department of Real Estate and Construction Management School of Architecture and the Built Environment SE – 100 44 Stockholm Printed by E-print Stockholm ISBN nr: 978-91-85783-19-9 TRITA-FOB-PHD-2011:4 2 Abstract This dissertation consists of five papers with different objectives. The overall objective is to improve knowledge of effective policies regarding socially deprived large housing estates. All studies deal with the real estate context from a housing company decision-making perspective. The first two papers focus on organisational issues and the following three papers deal with economic issues related to the development of a specific housing area. The research is based on case studies which involve specific methodologies such as interviews, direct observation and collecting data from company accounts. The main message of this thesis is that landlord policies and resources spent on operation and maintenance contribute to local area development. It is also underlined that there is a need for a paradigm shift in Swedish housing, since the regulatory framework appeared to be inadequate. The experience from this study shows that many problems can be solved within the existing laws and through efficient customised property management, but landlords need more effective incentives to improve their policies further. The first two papers address issues about how to organise local management resources in large housing estates.
    [Show full text]
  • RETEA GENERALA 01.07.2021.Cdr
    OTOPENI 780 783 OSTRATU R441 OTOPENI R442 PERIS R443 PISCU R444 GRUIU R446 R447 MICSUNESTII MARI R447B MOARA VLASIEI R448 SITARU 477 GREENFIELD STRAULESTI 204 304 203 204 Aleea PrivighetorilorJOLIE VILLE BANEASA 301 301 301 GREENFIELD 204 BUFTEA R436 PIATA PRESEI 304 131 Str. Jandarmeriei261 304 STRAULESTI Sos. Gh. Ionescu COMPLEX 97 204 205 304 261 Sisesti BANEASA RETEAUA DE TRANSPORT R402 205 131 261 335 BUFTEA GRADISTEA SITARU R402 261 205 R402 R436 Bd. OaspetilorStr. Campinita 361 605 COMPLEX 112 205 261 97 131 261301 COMERCIAL Sos. Bucuresti Ploiesti PUBLIC COLOSSEUM CARTIER 231 Sos. Chitilei Bd. Bucurestii Noi Sos. Straulesti R447 R447B R448 R477 203 335 361 605 780 783 112 R441 R442 R443 R444HENRI R446 COANDA 231 Bd. Aerogarii R402 97 605 231 112 112 CARTIER 112 301 112 DAMAROAIA 131 R436 335 231 Sos. Chitilei R402 24 331R436 CFR Str. Alex. Serbanescu 112 CONSTANTA CARTIER MERII PETCHII R409 112 DRIDU Str. N. Caramfil R402 Bd. Laminorului AUTOBAZA ANDRONACHE 331 65 86 112 135 243 Bd. NORDULUI112 301 382 Bd. Gloriei24 Str. Jiului 605 Sos. 112Pipera 135 Sos. Chitilei Poligrafiei PIATA PLATFORMA Bd. BucurestiiPajurei Noi 231 243 Str. Peris MEZES 780 783 INDUSTRIALA Str. PRESEI Str.Oi 3 45 65 86 331 243 3 45 382 PASAJ Sos. Bucuresti Ploiesti 3 41 243 PIPERA 382 DEPOUL R447 R447BR448 R477 112 231 243 i 65 86 97 243 16 36 COLENTINA 131105 203 205 261203 304 231 261 304 330 135 343 n tuz BUCURESTII NOI a R441 R442 R443 c 21 i CARTIER 605 tr 231R441 361 R442 783 R443 R444 R446 DEPOUL Bd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Policy of the Exchange Rate Promoted by National Bank of Romania and Its Implications Upon the Financial Stability
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics THE POLICY OF THE EXCHANGE RATE PROMOTED BY NATIONAL BANK OF ROMANIA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS UPON THE FINANCIAL STABILITY Vechiu Camelia “Constantin Brâncoveanu” University Pite 2ti, Faculty of Management-Marketing in Economic Affairs, Br ;ila Enache Elena “Constantin Brâncoveanu” University Pite 2ti, Faculty of Management-Marketing in Economic Affairs, Br ;ila Marin Carmen “Constantin Brâncoveanu” University Pite 2ti, Faculty of Management-Marketing in Economic Affairs, Br ;ila Chifane Cristina “Constantin Brâncoveanu” University Pite 2ti, Faculty of Management-Marketing in Economic Affairs, Br ;ila The more profound world economic crisis has strongly marked the evolution of the Romanian financial system. The size of current account deficit, the relatively high external financing needs and the dependence of the banks on it, the high ratio between loans in foreign currency and deposits in foreign currency made of the Romanian economy, a risky destination for investors. In these conditions, since the end of 2008 and throughout 2009, the government's economic program was focused on reducing the external deficit in both public and private sector, on minimizing the effects of recession, on avoiding a crisis of the exchange rate and on cooling the inflationary pressures. Keywords: monetary policy, exchange rate, external financing, budget deficit JEL classification: E58 1. The interventions of NBR on the foreign exchange market Supported by the global financial crisis, the evolution of the Leu rate has raised major problems. As in the period 2005-2007, the currency incomings have overestimated the Romanian national currency way above the level indicated by the fundamental factors of the exchange rate, the reduction of the foreign financing and the incertitude have afterwards determined an unjustified depreciation of the Romanian Leu.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Community and Belonging in a Designated Housing Estate for Disabled People
    Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183–2803) 2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 66–76 DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i3.2806 Article Creating Community and Belonging in a Designated Housing Estate for Disabled People Liz Ellis *, Sarah-Anne Muñoz, Katia Narzisi, Sara Bradley and Jenny Hall Division of Rural Health and Wellbeing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, IV2 3JH, Scotland; E-Mail: [email protected] (L.E.), [email protected] (S-A.M.), [email protected] (K.N.), [email protected] (S.B.), [email protected] (J.H.) * Corresponding author Submitted: 15 January 2020 | Accepted: 21 April 2020 | Published: 31 July 2020 Abstract In recent years there has been an ideological push within social care away from segregated housing provision towards supported housing integrated within the wider community (McConkey, Keogh, Bunting, Iriarte, & Watson, 2016; Merrells, Buchanan, & Waters, 2019; Overmars-Marx, Thomése, Verdonschot, & Meininger, 2014). Despite this, many housing so- lutions for older and disabled people continue to be built on a designated basis, with physical and emotional wellbeing outcomes being both contested and mixed. After reviewing key policy relating to social care housing alongside some of the theoretical and ideological positions, this article explores the social and emotional outcomes of a diverse group of disabled people living with mental health difficulties, physical and intellectual impairments, illnesses and age-related conditions, who moved into a small, purpose-built estate of smart homes. Drawing primarily on qualitative data collected from ten- ants prior to moving and again seven months following relocation, the impact of moving into the estate on tenants’ sense of wellbeing and feelings of inclusion will be analysed and discussed in relation to efforts to build a new community.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of HOSPITALS, CLINICS and PHYSICIANS with PRIVATE PRACTICE in ROMANIA Updated 04/2017
    LIST OF HOSPITALS, CLINICS AND PHYSICIANS WITH PRIVATE PRACTICE IN ROMANIA Updated 04/2017 DISCLAIMER: The U.S. Embassy Bucharest, Romania assumes no responsibility or liability for the professional ability or reputation of, or the quality of services provided by the medical professionals, medical facilities or air ambulance services whose names appear on the following lists. Names are listed alphabetically, and the order in which they appear has no other significance. Professional credentials and areas of expertise are provided directly by the medical professional, medical facility or air ambulance service. When calling from overseas, please dial the country code for Romania before the telephone number (+4). Please note that 112 is the emergency telephone number that can be dialed free of charge from any telephone or any mobile phone in order to reach emergency services (Ambulances, Fire & Rescue Service and the Police) in Romania as well as other countries of the European Union. We urge you to set up an ICE (In Case of Emergency) contact or note on your mobile phone or other portable electronics (such as Ipods), to enable first responders to get in touch with the person(s) you designated as your emergency contact(s). BUCHAREST Ambulance Services: 112 Private Ambulances SANADOR Ambulance: 021-9699 SOS Ambulance: 021-9761 BIOMEDICA Ambulance: 031-9101 State Hospitals: EMERGENCY HOSPITAL "FLOREASCA" (SPITALUL DE URGENTA "FLOREASCA") Calea Floreasca nr. 8, sector 1, Bucharest 014461 Tel: 021-599-2300 or 021-599-2308, Emergency line: 021-962 Fax: 021-599-2257 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.urgentafloreasca.ro Medical Director: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline / 1870 to After 1930 / ROMANIA
    Timeline / 1870 to After 1930 / ROMANIA Date Country Theme 1871 Romania Rediscovering The Past Alexandru Odobescu sends an archaeological questionnaire to teachers all over the country, who have to return information about archaeological discoveries or vestiges of antique monuments existing in the areas where they live or work. 1873 Romania International Exhibitions Two Romanians are members of the international jury of the Vienna International Exposition: agronomist and economist P.S. Aurelian and doctor Carol Davila. 1873 Romania Travelling The first tourism organisation from Romania, called the Alpine Association of Transylvania, is founded in Bra#ov. 1874 Romania Rediscovering The Past 18 April: decree for the founding of the Commission of Public Monuments to record the public monuments on Romanian territory and to ensure their conservation. 1874 Romania Reforms And Social Changes Issue of the first sanitation law in the United Principalities. The sanitation system is organised hierarchically and a Superior Medical Council, with a consultative role, is created. 1875 - 1893 Romania Political Context Creation of the first Romanian political parties: the Liberal Party (1875), the Conservative Party (1880), the Radical-Democratic Party (1888), and the Social- Democratic Party of Romanian Labourers (1893). 1876 Romania Reforms And Social Changes Foundation of the Romanian Red Cross. 1876 Romania Fine And Applied Arts 19 February: birth of the great Romanian sculptor Constantin Brâncu#i, author of sculptures such as Mademoiselle Pogany, The Kiss, Bird in Space, and The Endless Column. His works are today exhibited in museums in France, the USA and Romania. 1877 - 1881 Romania Political Context After Parliament declares Romania’s independence (May 1877), Romania participates alongside Russia in the Russian-Ottoman war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regeneration of Large-Scale Social Housing Estates
    The regeneration of large-scale Social Housing estates Spatial, territorial, institutional and planning dimensions © 2020, Brussels, SoHoLab Please do not distribute without the permission of the authors. First Version: 27/06/2018, Final Version: 21/03/20 ISBN 9789464007190 D/2020/SoHoLab, uitgever All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior persmission of the publisher. This document was produced the SoHoLab research team consisting of Architecture Urbanisme Société: Savoirs Enseignment Recherche (AUSser CNRS 3329); Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano (PoliMi, DAStU); and Cosmopolis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). The project has recieved funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, Agence National de la Recherche (ANR, France), Innvoris (Brussels, Belgium), Ministero dell’Istruzione dell’Università é della Ricerca (MIUR, Italy) under grant agreement No 693443. Refer to this report as: Aernouts, N., Maranghi, E. & Ryckewaert, M. (Eds.) (2020). The regeneration of large-scale Social Housing estates. Spatial, territorial, institutional and planning dimensions, Brussels: Soholab, 191 p. For more information: www.soholab.org Research team: Regional partners: Local partners: European and regional co-financing: The regeneration of large-scale Social Housing estates Spatial, territorial, institutional and planning dimensions Nele Aernouts, Elena Maranghi and Michael Ryckewaert (Editors) This report is dedicated to the memory of Andrei Feraru whose invaluable contribution to this project ended too soon. About | 7 About Already since the 1970s, internationally, the regeneration of large- scale modernist social housing estates has been on the research and policy agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    THE SOCIO-SPATIAL DIMENSION OF THE BUCHAREST GHETTOS Viorel MIONEL Silviu NEGUŢ Viorel MIONEL Assistant Professor, Department of Economics History and Geography, Faculty of International Business and Economics, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania Tel.: 0040-213-191.900 Email: [email protected] Abstract Based on a socio-spatial analysis, this paper aims at drawing the authorities’ attention on a few Bucharest ghettos that occurred after the 1990s. Silviu NEGUŢ After the Revolution, Bucharest has undergone Professor, Department of Economics History and Geography, many socio-spatial changes. The modifications Faculty of International Business and Economics, Academy of that occurred in the urban perimeter manifested Economic Studies Bucharest, Romania in the technical and urban dynamics, in the urban Tel.: 0040-213-191.900 infrastructure, and in the socio-economic field. The Email: [email protected] dynamics and the urban evolution of Bucharest have affected the community life, especially the community homogeneity intensely desired during the communist regime by the occurrence of socially marginalized spaces or ghettos as their own inhabitants call them. Ghettos represent an urban stain of color, a special morphologic framework. The Bucharest “ghettos” appeared by a spatial concentration of Roma population and of poverty in zones with a precarious infrastructure. The inhabitants of these areas (Zăbrăuţi, Aleea Livezilor, Iacob Andrei, Amurgului and Valea Cascadelor) are somehow constrained to live in such spaces, mainly because of lack of income, education and because of their low professional qualification. These weak points or handicaps exclude the ghetto population from social participation and from getting access to urban zones with good habitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania National Report
    Wide the SEE by Succ Mod Romania National Report Harghita Energy Management Public Service & UEM-CARDT The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Communities. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Romania National Report UEM-CARDT pag 1 Table of content A) INTRODUCTION 1. General overview of the country: 1.1. Meteorology: temperatures, global daily radiation 1.2. Anaglyph / Relief (use of territory) 1.3. Population: evolution for the last 1 year, actual situation and forecast 1.4. Macroeconomic statistics (GDP, per capita GDP, Per main sector GDP percentage, Sectors of activity, Employment – Unemployment, Indicators) 1.5. Statistical data for energy consumption, dependency on energy imports, price evolution, forecast for energy consumption, CO2 emissions (Kyoto Protocol commitments), etc B) STATE OF THE MARKET 2. Overview of the national market situation 2.1. Solar collector production and sales 2.2. Estimated solar parks in present year 2.3. Estimated annual solar thermal energy production in present year, equivalent CO2 emissions avoided in current year (on the basis of oil) 2.4. Product types and solar thermal applications 2.5. Market share of major manufacturers (per product type and application) 2.6. Sector employment 2.7. Imports - Exports C) STATE OF PRODUCTION 3. Main characteristics of production firms (size, concentration, mentality, financial capacity etc.) 4. Product technology and production methods 4.1. Product technology description of typical solar domestic hot water systems 5. Breakdown of solar systems’ cost 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Density, Distribution & Cost
    Density, tion&Costi l I I I I I I I l I l I '-{.{*n*G ; I i' i ,1 r' r- F DENSTTY, DISTRIBUTION AND COSTS HOUSING STUDY ) Sponsored by the .Centre for Urban and Community Studies,t University, of foronto Funded by Ltre eentral Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : A. J. Diamond RESEARCH ASSOCIATES: John Bizzell Robert van Spyk CONSULTANT: Dr. W. Michelson RESEARCH TEAIVI: Terry Cecil Peter Turner Maldwyn Williams r April I970 r t_ \ TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE 1 Introduction 1 2 Occupant Characteristics 16 3 Dwelling 23 4 Exterior Space 30 5 Circulation 45 6 Public Safety 59 7 Built Forrn 63 I Zoning 86 9 Field Analysis 101 10 Costs 110 1T Demonstrat.ion 152 Appendix A: Analytical Sampling l--43 Appendix B: Space as A Variable in Sociological Inquiry 1- 35 Appendix C: Household Activity Analysis 1-10 I Appendix D: Housing Issues r-7 Appendix E: Bibliography 1-8 i l_ "/ \ ] Introduction 1 J l I ) 1 INTRODUCTlON The reasons for undertaking this research may be simply stated: at present the predominant forms of housing built are at two ends of the density scale either very low or very high. Further, the small amount of housing which attempts to fill the middle ground does not satisfy the needs of occupants in general, and low income family urban dwellers in particular. Thus our attempts have been to investigate whether the characteristics of the highly favoured single family dwelling could be incorporated into housing forms in the middle range of densities.
    [Show full text]