MULTISTANDARD CHARGERS IN Usage and its implications CHAdeMO in a nutshell

330 50 GLOBAL CHARGER MEMBERS MANUFACTURERS CHAdeMO in a nutshell

200 150kW V2X CERTIFIED UPCOMING A REALITY CHARGER MODELS

+ VARIETY OF PLUGS Global plug-in sales by fast CHAdeMO chargers charging inlet

CHAdeMO 38% 33% Tesla EVs (720 000) Combo

AC

None 5% 15% 9%

25%

TOTAL PHEVs (470 000) 11539 75% Note: as of May 2016 Source: IHS Automotive; 2010-2015 cumulative data CHAdeMO in Europe

Evolution of BEV market in EU 200000 N/A 88% fast-chargeable 100%

150000 AC fast 22%

Combo2 20%

100000 15% 50% AFI Directive Tesla proposal CHAdeMO- 50000 CHAdeMO Compatible 43%

0 0% Q1/2010 Q1/2011 Q1/2012 Q1/2013 Q1/2014 Q1/2015 Fast charging type

Source: JATO (2010-2015), EU28 (except for , Cyprus, , , Malta) + , , Israel, , Russia. Not including electric light commercial vehicles (LCVs) or e-quadricycles. Assuming all CCS automakers’ EVs as “fast-chargeable” Multistandard charger – de facto standard

EV USERS  More charge stations for all

OPERATORS / INVESTORS  Limited incremental cost (5-10%) AFI Directive “at least Combo2” and “allow  Faster investment return multistandard charging” OEM’S  Competition with cars

Almost 100% of fast chargers currently being installed in Europe are multistandard chargers Multistandard chargers usage data

The UK, Ireland

Hypothesis: Usage breakdown would strongly correlate with the local fast-chargeable EV market share by inlet.

Netherlands

Austria Rapid Charge Network, UK CHARGING BY INLET 74 75% 72% Multistandard chargers

15% 15% BEV SHARE BY INLET PHEVs 9% 13% Tesla AC 10% 19% Charging sessions kWh Charged

CCS AC CCS CHAdeMO 18 000 8% CHAdeMO 100% BEVs kWh ENERGY 9.7 11.0 8.9

CHAdeMO 28.6 26.5 26.9 63% MIN 18 000 Mitsubishi (per transaction) Outlanders Data from 2013 to 2015 Data from the operator, collection period from July 2014 to September 2015 Fastned,

CHARGING BY INLET (kWh) 50 Multistandard stations 18% AC 45% CCS

BEV SHARE BY INLET PHEVs 38% CHAdeMO

AC Tesla 12% 54% CCS 6% CHAdeMO CHARGING BREAKDOWN Outlander Tesla Other BEV CHAdeMO 9 200 100% BEVs kWh Charged 18% 26% 56%

CHAdeMO 28% Charging sessions 50% 24% 26% 20 000 Mitsubishi Outlanders Data from 2013 to 2015 Data from the operator, early 2016 Clever, Denmark CHARGING BY INLET

250 70% 70% Fast charge points

18% 14% 16% BEV SHARE BY INLET 12% AC 10% Charging sessions kWh CCS 16% AC CCS CHAdeMO 5 900 Tesla BEVs kWh 57% ENERGY 10.6 8.0 9.1 CHAdeMO 17% MIN 50 25 29 (per transaction) Data from 2013 to 2015. Data from the operator, Feb 2016 Smartrics, CHARGING BY INLET 61 64% 63% Multistandard chargers

27% 30%

BEV SHARE BY INLET 9% 7% Tesla 21% AC Charging sessions kWh delivered 32%

AC CCS CHAdeMO 3 500 BEVs kWh CHAdeMO ENERGY 11.4 8.9 12.8 20% CCS 27% MIN 122.3 33.1 33.9 (per transaction) Data from 2013 to 2015 Data from the operator, Jan-Dec 2015 Summary and Implications Implications

Hypothesis  Fast charging market is very new, unstable, and dependent on a number of factors Multistandard charger usage breakdown would (EV types, incentives, customers, etc.) correlate with the local fast-chargeable EV market share breakdown by inlet  CHAdeMO opinions: Conclusion  Charger operators be given full flexibility to define their infrastructure Need more evidence to prove the hypothesis  Policymakers hold a technology-neutral position

Limitations • Data access

• Treatment of “other” charging infrastructure THANK YOU

Tomoko Blech Natalia Kozdra [email protected]