DOCSLIB.ORG

Catalonia's Legitimate Right to Decide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catalonia's Legitimate Right to Decide CATALONIA’S LEGITIMATE RIGHT TO DECIDE PATHS TO SELF-DETERMINATION A REPORT BY A COMMISSION OF INTERNATIONAL EXPERTS NICOLAS LEVRAT Professor at the University of Geneva, coordinator of the Report SANDRINA ANTUNES Professor at the Universidade do Minho GUILLAUME TUSSEAU Professor at Sciences Po, Paris PAUL WILLIAMS Professor at American University in Washington, DC CATALONIA’S LEGITIMATE RIGHT TO DECIDE | PATHS TO SELF-DETERMINATION ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AER Assembly of European Regions ANC Assemblea Nacional Catalana AVANCEM Espai socialista BL Basic Law C Constitution CDC Convergència Democràtica de Catalunya C’s Ciudadanos CiU Convergència I Unió CoR Committee of the Regions CSQP Catalunya Sí que Pot CUP Candidatura d’Unitat Popular DC Demòcrates de Catalunya ICJ International Court of Justice ECHR European Convention of Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights ECJ European Court of Justice ERC Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya EU European Union ICV-EUiA Iniciativa per Catalunya Verds-Esquerra Unida I Alternativa IU Izquierda Unida JxS Junts pel Sí MES Moviment d’ Esquerres OC Ómnium Cultural P Podemos PDD Plataforma pel Dret a Decidir PP Partido Popular PSC Partit dels Socialistes de Catalunya PSOE Partido Socialista Obrero Espanol TEU Treaty on European Union TFEU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union UCD Unión de Centro Democrático UDC Unió Democràtica de Catalunya 1 CATALONIA’S LEGITIMATE RIGHT TO DECIDE | PATHS TO SELF-DETERMINATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr. Nicolas Levrat is a Professor of European and International Law at the University of Geneva. He’s the Director of the International Law and International Organization Department of the Law Faculty since 2016. He has been the founder, in 2012, of the Global studies Institute at the University of Geneva, which nowadays is home to about 1’300 students and host more than 100 researchers. He has previously been the Director of the European Institute of the University of Geneva, from 2007 to 2013. He has also been a European civil servant at the Council of Europe (1991-1994) and a Professor at the Université Libre de Bruxelles from 1998 to 2004. He received his PhD from the University of Geneva in 1992. His research interests focus on European Institutional Law, Democracy, Federalism, Local Regional and multi-level governance, Minority Rights and most recently Global Law. He’s the author or editor of 20 books on these topics. Dr. Levrat has conducted studies for numerous governments, the Council of Europe, the Committee of the Regions, the European Commission or the World Bank. He also promotes interdisciplinary studies within European Universities. He’s member of numerous learned societies and the co-founder and current vice-President of the Global and Transnational Law Society. Dr. Sandrina Antunes is an Assistant Professor at the Department of International Relations and Public Administration at the Universidade do Minho (Portugal) and a scientific fellow at the Research Center for the Study of Politics (CEVIPOL) at the Université Libre de Bruxelles (Belgium). She is currently the director of the bachelor degree in Political Science and the vice-director of the Research Center in Political Science at the Universidade do Minho (CICP). She holds a Bachelor Degree in International Relations (Universidade do Minho) and a Phd in Political Science (Université Libre de Bruxelles). She has worked for the Committee of the Regions (CoR) and for the Assembly of European Regions (AER). She has been a visiting researcher at the London School of Economics and at the University of Edinburgh. She preferentially works on regionalism and nationalism, and she has a particular interest for nationalist political parties. Her main interests of research are related to dynamics of territorial mobilization in Europe ranging from regionalist and nationalist political parties to economic stakeholders. She has a particular interest in evolutionary forms of para-diplomatic activities and lobbying activities in Europe. She is also interested in devolutionary, federalist and regionalist processes within 2 CATALONIA’S LEGITIMATE RIGHT TO DECIDE | PATHS TO SELF-DETERMINATION all categories of political systems. Beyond academia, she is a scientific collaborator at the Galician Institute for Research (IGADI) and at the Centre Maurits Coppieters (CMC), a think tank sponsored by the European EFA group at the European Parliament that promotes research on regionalism and nationalism in Europe (Brussels). Dr. Guillaume Tusseau is Professor of Public Law at Sciences Po Law School, Paris, Member of the Institut universitaire de France and of the Centre Bentham. He holds a bachelor degree of the Institut d’études politiques of Toulouse, a Master in Public Law, and a Master in Legal Theory. He received his doctorate in Public Law from the University Paris X – Nanterre. He also received a doctorate honoris causa from the Universidad Privada Antonio Guillermo Urrelo (Cajamarca, Peru). He has been visiting professor at the London School of Economics. His main fields of specialization are constitutional law, especially comparative constitutional review, and legal theory. He extensively taught in both fields in France and abroad. He authored several books and articles, among which Jeremy Bentham et le droit constitutionnel. Une approche de l’utilitarisme juridique [Jeremy Bentham and constitutional law. An approach to legal utilitarianism] (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2001); Les normes d’habilitation [Power-conferring norms] (Paris: Dalloz, 2006), Contre les «modèles» de justice constitutionnelle. Essai de critique méthodologique [Against “models” of constitutional review. An essay in methodological criticism] (Bologna: Bononia UP, 2009), and with Olivier Duhamel, Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques [Constitutional law and political institutions], 4th ed. (Paris: Le Seuil, 2016). Dr. Paul R. Williams is the President and Co-Founder of the Public International Law & Policy Group (PILPG) and the Rebecca I. Grazier Professor of Law and International Relations at American University in Washington, D.C. Since 1995 PILPG has provided pro bono legal assistance to states and governments regarding peace negotiations and drafting post- conflict constitutions. In 2005, Dr. Williams was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by half a dozen of his pro bono government clients for his work advising them on peace negotiations and questions of state succession. Dr. Williams is a leading expert on the issues of state recognition, self-determination, and state succession. As an attorney-advisor for the U.S. Department of State’s Office of the Legal Adviser, he advised the U.S. government on issues of state succession in the former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe and the Balkans. Since then, Dr. Williams has advised the President of Macedonia, the Kosovo government, South Sudanese officials, and the Foreign 3 CATALONIA’S LEGITIMATE RIGHT TO DECIDE | PATHS TO SELF-DETERMINATION Minister of Montenegro on independence and state succession matters. He has also written more than a dozen publications on these topics and has provided expert commentary to the U.S. House of Representatives about sovereignty and self-determination. Dr. Williams has also served as a Senior Associate with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Counsellor on the Executive Council of the American Society of International Law, and is a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. He received his J.D. from Stanford Law School and his Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge. 4 CATALONIA’S LEGITIMATE RIGHT TO DECIDE | PATHS TO SELF-DETERMINATION TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 1 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 INTRODUCTION. EXPLORING THE LEGITIMACY PATHS FOR THE RIGHT OF CATALANS TO DECIDE ON THEIR POLITICAL FUTURE IN EUROPE 9 The Working Method 9 The Substance of the Issue 10 I. HISTORICAL, POLITICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL BACKGROUND FOR THE CURRENT SITUATION IN CATALONIA 14 1.1. Catalan Party System and Territorial Preferences within Catalan Political Parties 14 1.2. Catalan-Spanish Negotiating Process and the Tortuous Path to a Legally Binding Referendum 16 1.2.1. Between 1980-2003: a “fish in a bag” strategy 17 1.2.1.1. From 1980 to 2003: Majority Government of CiU 17 1.2.2. Between 2003-2012: a “hard ball” strategy 18 1.2.2.1. From 2003 to 2006: Tripartite Coalition of PSC-ERC-ICV-EUiA 18 1.2.2.2. Between 2006 and 2010: PSC-ERC-ICV-EuiA 20 1.2.2.3. Between 2010 and 2012: CiU 20 1.2.3. Since 2012: a “chicken” strategy 22 1.2.3.1. Between 2012 and 2015: Minority Government of CiU with the support of ERC 22 1.2.3.2. Since September 2015: Junts pel Sí Coalition 24 1.2.4. Intermediary Conclusion 25 II. FOUNDATIONS FOR CATALONIA’S RIGHT TO DECIDE ITS POLITICAL FUTURE 26 2.1. The Democratic Support for the Right to Decide: When a Referendum on Political Independence is the only way out 26 2.1.1. The Emergence of Secessionist Popular Demands: A bottom-up and top-down Movement 27 2.1.2. The Role of Organized Civil Society in Catalan’s “Right to Decide” 31 2.1.2.1. Òmnium Cultural 31 5 CATALONIA’S LEGITIMATE RIGHT TO DECIDE | PATHS TO SELF-DETERMINATION 2.1.2.2. The ANC - Catalan National Assembly 32 2.1.3. Survey of Catalan Public Opinion: What does Catalonia Want? 33 2.1.4. Catalan Public Opinion and Voting Behavior: Who voted What? 38 2.1.5. Is Nationalism the Cause of Increased Demand for Independence in Catalonia? 39 2.1.6. Intermediary Conclusion 42 2.2. Mapping the Constitutional Philosophy of the “Right to Decide”: The Emergence of a Transconstitutional Jurisprudence 43 2.2.1. Demystifying parochialism 43 2.2.2. The Horizon of Constitutional Contractualism 44 2.2.3. The Ethics of the Right to Decide 45 2.2.3.1. The “Just-cause theories” justifying the exercise of the Right to Decide 46 2.2.3.2. The “Choice theory” justifying the exercise of the Right to Decide 48 2.2.3.3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Independentism and the European Union
    POLICY BRIEF 7 May 2014 Independentism and the European Union Graham Avery Independentism1 is a live issue in Europe today. In the European Union separatist parties have gained votes in Scotland, Catalonia, Flanders and elsewhere2, and referendums are in prospect. In Eastern Europe Crimea's referendum has led to an international crisis. This note addresses some basic questions raised by these developments: • What is the European Union's policy on independentism? • Is the division of a member state into two states bad for the EU? • How is the organisational structure of the EU relevant to independentism? BACKGROUND The situation on the ground in the EU today may be summarised as follows: Scotland: a referendum on independence will take place in Scotland on 18 September 2014. The Scottish National Party, which won a majority of seats in the Scottish elections of 2011 and formed a government, is campaigning for 'yes'. Although the British parliament agreed to the referendum, the main political parties in London are campaigning for 'no'. Opinion polls show that 'no' has more supporters than 'yes', but the gap has diminished, many voters are undecided, and the result may be close.3 Catalonia: in regional elections in 2012 the alliance Convergence and Union (Convergència i Unió) won 31% of the vote and formed a coalition government, which has announced a referendum on independence for 9 November 2014. Since Spain's Parliament has declared it unconstitutional, the referendum may not take place. But the next regional elections may effectively become a substitute for a referendum. Belgium: the New Flemish Alliance (Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie) gained ground in national elections in 2010 on a platform of independence for Flanders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spanish Government and Subsequently Suspended by the Constitutional Court Until It Ruled on the Issue
    CatalExit a Matrix Game about the 2017 Spanish constitutional crisis by Tim Price. Introduction This is a Matrix Game intended to explore the issues and options surrounding the 2017 Spanish constitutional crisis, in the run up to Regional Elections on 21 December 17 to appoint a new Catalan Parliament following the suspension of the previous Parliament. It is the product of only a few hours exploratory game design taken from the Connections Netherlands 2017 conference on 14 Nov 2017. Background The 2017 Spanish constitutional crisis, also known as the Catalan crisis, is an ongoing political conflict between the Government of Spain and the Government of Catalonia under President Carles Puigdemont—the legal government of Catalonia until 28 October 2017—over the issue of Catalan independence, starting after a law intending to allow a Catalan independence referendum was denounced by the Spanish government and subsequently suspended by the Constitutional Court until it ruled on the issue. The events have been described as "one of the worst political crises in modern Spanish history". Puigdemont's government announced that neither central Spanish authorities nor the courts would halt their plans and that it intended to hold the vote anyway, sparking a legal backlash that quickly spread from the Spanish and Catalan governments to Catalan municipalities—as local mayors were urged by the Generalitat to provide logistical support and help for the electoral process to be carried out—as well as to the Constitutional Court, the High Court of Justice of Catalonia and state prosecutors. By 15 September, as pro-Catalan independence parties began their referendum campaigns, the Spanish government had launched an all-out legal offensive to thwart the upcoming vote, including threats of a financial takeover of much of the Catalan budget, police seizing pro-referendum posters, pamphlets and leaflets which had been regarded as illegal and criminal investigations ordered on the over 700 local mayors who had publicly agreed to help stage the referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Casanova, Julían, the Spanish Republic and Civil
    This page intentionally left blank The Spanish Republic and Civil War The Spanish Civil War has gone down in history for the horrific violence that it generated. The climate of euphoria and hope that greeted the over- throw of the Spanish monarchy was utterly transformed just five years later by a cruel and destructive civil war. Here, Julián Casanova, one of Spain’s leading historians, offers a magisterial new account of this crit- ical period in Spanish history. He exposes the ways in which the Republic brought into the open simmering tensions between Catholics and hard- line anticlericalists, bosses and workers, Church and State, order and revolution. In 1936, these conflicts tipped over into the sacas, paseos and mass killings that are still passionately debated today. The book also explores the decisive role of the international instability of the 1930s in the duration and outcome of the conflict. Franco’s victory was in the end a victory for Hitler and Mussolini, and for dictatorship over democracy. julián casanova is Professor of Contemporary History at the University of Zaragoza, Spain. He is one of the leading experts on the Second Republic and the Spanish Civil War and has published widely in Spanish and in English. The Spanish Republic and Civil War Julián Casanova Translated by Martin Douch CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521493888 © Julián Casanova 2010 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Ever Faithful
    Ever Faithful Ever Faithful Race, Loyalty, and the Ends of Empire in Spanish Cuba David Sartorius Duke University Press • Durham and London • 2013 © 2013 Duke University Press. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper ∞ Tyeset in Minion Pro by Westchester Publishing Services. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Sartorius, David A. Ever faithful : race, loyalty, and the ends of empire in Spanish Cuba / David Sartorius. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978- 0- 8223- 5579- 3 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978- 0- 8223- 5593- 9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Blacks— Race identity— Cuba—History—19th century. 2. Cuba— Race relations— History—19th century. 3. Spain— Colonies—America— Administration—History—19th century. I. Title. F1789.N3S27 2013 305.80097291—dc23 2013025534 contents Preface • vii A c k n o w l e d g m e n t s • xv Introduction A Faithful Account of Colonial Racial Politics • 1 one Belonging to an Empire • 21 Race and Rights two Suspicious Affi nities • 52 Loyal Subjectivity and the Paternalist Public three Th e Will to Freedom • 94 Spanish Allegiances in the Ten Years’ War four Publicizing Loyalty • 128 Race and the Post- Zanjón Public Sphere five “Long Live Spain! Death to Autonomy!” • 158 Liberalism and Slave Emancipation six Th e Price of Integrity • 187 Limited Loyalties in Revolution Conclusion Subject Citizens and the Tragedy of Loyalty • 217 Notes • 227 Bibliography • 271 Index • 305 preface To visit the Palace of the Captain General on Havana’s Plaza de Armas today is to witness the most prominent stone- and mortar monument to the endur- ing history of Spanish colonial rule in Cuba.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiating Pro-Independence Movements in Catalonia and Galicia: a Contemporary View
    TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY School of Business and Governance Department of Law Anna Joala DIFFERENTIATING PRO-INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENTS IN CATALONIA AND GALICIA: A CONTEMPORARY VIEW Bachelor’s thesis Programme: International Relations Supervisor: Vlad Alex Vernygora, MA Tallinn 2018 I declare that I have compiled the paper independently and all works, important standpoints and data by other authors have been properly referenced and the same paper has not been previously been presented for grading. The document length is 9222 words from the introduction to the end of summary. Anna Joala …………………………… (signature, date) Student code: 113357TASB Student e-mail address: [email protected] Supervisor: Vlad Alex Vernygora, MA: The paper conforms to requirements in force …………………………………………… (signature, date) Chairman of the Defence Committee: Permitted to the defence ………………………………… (name, signature, date) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 5 1. EXPLANATORY THEORY OF SECESSIONISM ............................................................... 8 1.1. Definition of secessionism ................................................................................................ 8 1.2. Sub-state nationalism .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Governmental Power Sharing: Imperative? a Comparative Case Study on Decentralization and Its Influence on Public Support for Secessionism
    Governmental power sharing: imperative? A comparative case study on decentralization and its influence on public support for secessionism Andrés Durante Master’s Thesis Uppsala University, 2020 Department of Government Supervisor: Moa Mårtensson Abstract Scholarly debates about the merits of decentralization have long been central in comparative politics. However, there is a lack of consensus in the existing literature on its relationship with secessionism, and previous scholarship on autonomy and power sharing suffers from several shortcomings that make it difficult to evaluate the influence of decentralization on secessionist conflict. To address this research gap, a new theoretical framework is proposed which suggests inclusion for regional elites within the state’s national decision-making institutions is imperative for the prevention against secessionism in established democracies. Utilizing an innovative comparative process tracing method, a theory-driven within-case empirical analysis and between-case comparison is conducted between Spain and Catalonia, and the United Kingdom and Scotland. The findings illustrate that decentralization with a higher degree of governmental power sharing (shared rule) is associated with a lower degree of public support for secessionism, and this association is produced through a social mechanism of power. Keywords: decentralization, power sharing, secessionism, Spain, Catalonia, UK, Scotland Table of contents LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Catalan Independence Referendum: an Assessment of the Process of Self-Determination
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2017 The Catalan Independence referendum: An assessment of the process of self-determination Turp, Daniel ; Caspersen, Nina ; Qvortrup, Matt ; Welp, Yanina Abstract: This report addresses different aspects of the proposed referendum in Catalonia. In chapter one, Profes- sor Yanina Welp analyzes and presents a political sociological perspective on the respective evolutions of the Catalan support for or rejection of independence. This chapter also summarizes the events that led to the demand for a referendum. In chapter two, Professor Nina Caspersen presents a comparative and historical overview of the political context of the demand for independence for Catalonia and draws up a number of scenarios for the future, depending on the outcome of the referendum. In the subse- quent chapter, Professor Matt Qvortrup analyzes when referendums are held and what determines their outcome; as well, he analyzes the legislation governing the conduct of the proposed referendums. He concludes, with some reservations, that the current legislation meets international standards. Finally, Professor Daniel Turp analyzes and assesses the legality of the proposed referendum. Professor Daniel Turp examines the right to decide of the people of Catalonia in light of rules found in international, Eu- ropean, Spanish, Catalan and comparative law. Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-143018 Published Research Report Published Version Originally published at: Turp, Daniel; Caspersen, Nina; Qvortrup, Matt; Welp, Yanina (2017). The Catalan Independence refer- endum: An assessment of the process of self-determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalonia Vs Spain: a Desire for More Autonomy Has Led to a Surge of Independentism and a Divided Catalan Society
    Department of Political Science Chair of Political Sociology Catalonia vs Spain: A desire for more autonomy has led to a surge of independentism and a divided Catalan society SUPERVISOR CANDIDATE Noé Meiler Prof. Michele Sorice Matr. 0792 ACADEMIC YEAR 2017-2018 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2 History .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Early History of Catalan Institutions: ........................................................................................................... 3 The Generalities .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 The rise of “Catalanism” ............................................................................................................................. 4 Republicanism and Federalism.................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 The Franco Regime ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Primo De Rivera ..........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Leaders for Social Change
    Ignasi Carreras, Amy Leaverton and Maria Sureda Leaders for social change Characteristics and competencies of leadership in NGOs Esade‐PwC Social Leadership Program 2008‐09 ESADE-PwC Social Leadership Program This publication forms part of the ESADE-PwC Social Leadership Pro- gram, organised by ESADE’s Institute for Social Innovation and the PricewaterhouseCoopers Foundation. It is a joint initiative aimed at gen- erating and spreading knowledge about leadership in NGOs and other non-profit organisations, as well as creating an area where social lead- ers can reflect and exchange experiences. The program’s objectives are: ► To generate knowledge on leadership in the NGO and non-profit or- ganisation sector. ► To help develop leadership capacities in Spanish non-profit organisa- tions. ► To spread the knowledge generated to all organisations in the sector. ► To help reinforce the credibility of the organisations in the third sector. In order to achieve this, the program combines the following elements: ► Leadership Forums: Working and exchange sessions with the manag- ers participating in the program ► Research ► The creation of case studies ► Annual publication with results ► Public engagements ► Regular diffusion. Ignasi Carreras, Amy Leaverton and Maria Sureda Leaders for social change Characteristics and competencies of leadership in NGOs Leaders for social change: Characteristics and competencies of leadership in NGOs Authors: Ignasi Carreras, Amy Leaverton and Maria Sureda With the collaboration of PricewaterhouseCoopers Foundation Revision and correction: Marita Osés Edition and Design: Institute for Social Innovation, ESADE, 2009 www.socialinnovation.esade.edu [email protected] Front and back cover images: © Ackley Road Photos - Fotolia.com ISBN: 978-84-88971-31-9 The contents of this document are the property of their authors and may not be used for com- mercial purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Sovereignty and Nationalist Politics in Spain: the Influence of Regional Financing on the Territorial Agendas of Basque and Catalan Nationalist Parties
    Fiscal Sovereignty and Nationalist Politics in Spain: The Influence of Regional Financing on the Territorial Agendas of Basque and Catalan Nationalist Parties Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Caroline Gray May 2016 Fiscal Sovereignty and Nationalist Politics in Spain: The Influence of Regional Financing on the Territorial Agendas of Basque and Catalan Nationalist Parties Caroline Gray Abstract This PhD thesis investigates the influence of the regional financing systems in Spain on the evolution of the territorial agendas of the mainstream Basque and Catalan nationalist parties, the Basque Nationalist Party (Partido Nacionalista Vasco, PNV) and Democratic Convergence of Catalonia (Convergència Democràtica de Catalunya, CDC). Spain offers the opportunity to compare two different models of fiscal decentralisation and their significance for the political evolution of two contrasting nationalist movements. While Catalonia forms part of the common financing system, which gives the regions relatively limited tax-raising competences and involves substantial revenue transfers from central government, the Basque region raises almost all of its own taxes under a separate system of extensive fiscal autonomy (the Concierto Económico or Economic Agreement). At different times since the late 1990s, both the PNV and CDC have sought a fundamental reconfiguration of their respective territories’ relationship with Spain. The question posed is why the form of accommodationist politics practised by the PNV and CDC in the 1980s and 1990s has been transformed since then, leading to shifts towards pro-sovereignty agendas, which embrace a spectrum of potential projects ranging from some degree of statehood and political sovereignty within Spain through to full independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
    ___________________________________________________________________ Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Application against Spain by Carles Puigdemont, President-Elect of Catalonia Lodged 1 March 2018 __________________________________________________________________ PUIGDEMONT -v- SPAIN SUMMARY: In this application Mr. Carles PUIGDEMONT alleges that Spain is guilty of violating its international treaty obligations through the cumulative imposition of disproportionate and unjustified restrictions with the exercise of his political rights under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”), and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”). Spain is a State Party to both treaties. It is also a signatory, without relevant reservations, to the Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, which provides for the right of individual petition. Spain has not notified any relevant derogation to the provisions of the ICCPR which thus remain fully in force. It is legally bound by treaty obligation to secure the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the ICCPR, throughout the territory of Spain, and to all those who fall within its jurisdiction. Mr. PUIGDEMONT brings this individual petition to the United Nations Human Rights Committee in order to vindicate his right to stand for elections (article 25, ICCPR); his right to freedom of association with other secessionist politicians and political parties in pursuit of a common goal of securing independence from Spain for Catalonia (article 22, ICCPR); and his right to freedom of peaceful political expression in support of the cause of independence for Catalonia (article 19, ICCPR). He invites the Committee to hold that these rights have been violated by cumulative and continuing conduct of the Kingdom of Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspiracy, Coup D'état and Civil War in Seville
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Conspiracy, coup d’état and civil war in Seville (1936-1939): History and myth in Francoist Spain Rúben Emanuel Leitão Prazeres Serém A thesis submitted to the Department of International History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, November 2012 1 Declaration I, Ruben Emanuel Leitão Prazeres Serém, hereby declare that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I declare that my thesis consists of 105,340 words. 2 Abstract This thesis deconstructs the bases of enduring Francoist myth that General Queipo de Llano heroically conquered Seville with a handful of soldiers. Having established the full ramifications of that conquest, it goes on to assess the political, social, economic and cultural implications of the Spanish Civil War in Seville, the largest urban centre to fall to the military rebels at the beginning of the conflict. Chapter I examines the nature and infrastructure of the military conspiracy against the democratic Republic developed in response to the Popular Front electoral victory of February 1936. Chapter II scrutinises the career of General Queipo, in particular his metamorphosis from a marginal figure in the conspiracy into a rebel secular saint.
    [Show full text]