DOCSLIB.ORG

Plant Feeding Mites of South Dakota Leland D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plant Feeding Mites of South Dakota Leland D South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletins SDSU Agricultural Experiment Station 1966 Plant Feeding Mites of South Dakota Leland D. White Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_tb Recommended Citation White, Leland D., "Plant Feeding Mites of South Dakota" (1966). Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletins. 38. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_tb/38 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the SDSU Agricultural Experiment Station at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Technical Bulletin 27 May 1966 Plant Feeding Mites of South Dakota Entomology-Zoology Department Agricultural Experiment Station South Dakota State University, Brookings ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Appreciation is extended to: E. W. Baker for assistance in identification of Tetranychidae; H . H. Keifer, who identified specimens of Eriophy­ idae; C. A. Taylor, South Dakota State Univer­ sity plant taxonomist, for assistance in preparation of host-plant scientific names and identification of selected host plants; research assistants, S. A. Johnson, H. C. Schroeder, and G. H. Schwebach; faculty members of the South Dakota State Uni­ versity Entomology-Zoology Department; and to other University staff members who made direct and indirect contributions during this study. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ------------------------ -------------- -- --------------------·----------------------------------------------------- 3 Taxonomic status of the mites ________________________________________________ ___________________ ________ _____ 4 Determination of species __________ ________________ __ _____ ______ ___ ____________________ ________ ____________________ 4 Collecting and Mounting Methods __ _______________________________________ _______ ________________ _______ __ _____ 5 Eriophyid preparation and mounting media_____________________________________ ___________ ____ __ ___ _ 6 Economic Importance ----------- --- ---------------- ------------------- ------------------------------------------------- 7 Plant feeding ------------- ---------------------- -- -------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- 7 Plant diseases and mites ___________________________________________ _________ __ ________ ______ __ ___________________ ___ 7 Distribution and Biology ___ __ _______ _______ _____ ·-------------------------- .·--------------·----------------------- -- 9 Tetranychidae ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9 Geographic distribution ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Biology ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Eriophyidae --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Geographic distribution -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Biology -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Tarsonemidae ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ 10 Geographic distribution -----------------------------------· -- -·· ·----------------------------------------------- 10 Biology -------------------- ------------------------------------------------ ·----------------------------------------------- 10 Discussion of the Species ______ __ ________ ___ ____________ ___---- ------------------------------ _____ _____________ -------- ·· · 11 T etranychidae ------------------ -------------------- ------ -- -------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Bryobia ____ __ __ ____ --···-·--··· ____ _____ -- ------------·-·-· ____ _________ __------ --------- ------------- _____ ____ __ ________ 15 Bryobia praetiosa --------------·--------------------------- -- -------·----------------------------------··------ 15 B ryobia ru briocu/ us --------------------------· ___ _____ _·------------------ ____ .. --·-------------------------- 16 Petrohia ---------------------------··-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------·- 18 Petrohia /atens ----------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------------------------ 18 Panonychus ______ -----------·----------·--------------··----------------··--- ··· ________ .. ·-----------------------______ 20 Panonychus ulmi ----------------------------------------------------·---------------------------------------- 21 Schizotetranychus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- __ 23 Schizo tetran yeh us el ym us ------------ -------------------------------------------- __ __ _________ __ __ _______ 23 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page Eotetranyehus -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 Eotetranye h us populi -------· __ ·-------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- 24 Eotetranye h us matth yssei ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 Eotetranyehus ( new species) ------------------------------------------- · ------------------------------ 29 Oligonyehus ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- 29 0 ligonye h us pratensis ---------------------------------------- -------------- ·------------------------------- 31 Olt'gon ye h us bieolor ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 31 Oligonyehus ( new species) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 33 T etranye hus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 33 T etran ye h us telarius ------------------------------------------· ________ ·------------------------------------ 35 T etran ye h us sinhai --------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- 39 T etran ye h us medanieli ----------------------------------- ·------------------------------------------------ 41 T etran ye h us eanadensis -------------------------- --·------------------------------------------------------- 41 Eriophyidae -------------------------------------------------------· ---------------------------------------------------- 46 Abacarus hystrix _________ ____ ____________________ _________________ _____ ____ ______________ ,, __ ___________________ 46 Aeulus ( ? ) dubius -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 48 Aeulus mekenziei --------------------------------------- ···---------------------------------------------------- 49 Aceria tulipae -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- 49 A baearus ( new species) -----------------------------· ·-------· ---- ·--·------------------------------------- 52 T arsonemidae ---------------------- -- -------------- -- ____________ __ ___ ____ __ -- ---- ----------------------· ________ _ 52 Steneotarsonemus __ _____ _____ ______ __-· ---·----- ___ -· ·---- -----· -------____ _-----·-----------·- -- ------- 56 Steneotarsonemus hyaleos ____ ____ . -· 56 Miscellaneous Mite Collections ___ _ ·-- -· __ ------ ---- · __ __ ·---·--· ___ __ -·-- ----· __ __ _ 57 Mesostigmata ____ __ ..... _ _____ ___ _ ____ __________ __ ------··-----·· · __ --·-- _---·-·- -- . 57 Trombidiformes __ ___ --- ----------- -------- ·--- ------- --------·--- ·- ---··--------- ----·- -- ___ __ ___ __.. 58 Tydeidae ------------·- --·--- - ----------------· ___ __ __ _____ _____ __ __ __ __ ________ ___ ___ _____ __.. _______ ------ ----- 58 Stigmaeidae --------------------------·--·-------- ------ ·-- -----------·------------------------·-------------------- 58 Erythraeidae ------------·-··------------- --------------- ---------------------·--- --- · ··--------------------------- 58 Sareoptiformes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 56 Literature Cited ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 59 2 Plant Feeding Mites of South Dakota By LELAND D. WHITE, Assistant Professor, Entomology-Zoology INTRODUCTION This phytophagous mite study is It is difficult to estimate an an­ the first of its kind in South Dako­ nual dollar loss to South Dakota ta. Previous records of identified agriculture due to plant feeding species from this state are practi­ mites. However, these pests are of cally unknown. major concern to the national agri­ The economic importance of phy­ cultural economy and as such share tophagous mites, their distribution with insects a position of pest im­ and importance in surrounding portance to the economy of South states is a well
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Risk of Exposure of a Selected Rural Population in South Poland to Allergenic Mites
    Experimental and Applied Acarology https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-019-00355-7 Risk of exposure of a selected rural population in South Poland to allergenic mites. Part II: acarofauna of farm buildings Krzysztof Solarz1 · Celina Pająk2 Received: 5 September 2018 / Accepted: 27 February 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Exposure to mite allergens, especially from storage and dust mites, has been recognized as a risk factor for sensitization and allergy symptoms that could develop into asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of mites in debris and litter from selected farm buildings of the Małopolskie province, South Poland, with particular refer- ence to allergenic and/or parasitic species as a potential risk factor of diseases among farm- ers. Sixty samples of various materials (organic dust, litter, debris and residues) from farm buildings (cowsheds, barns, chaff-cutter buildings, pigsties and poultry houses) were sub- jected to acarological examination. The samples were collected in Lachowice and Kurów (Suski district, Małopolskie). A total of 16,719 mites were isolated including specimens from the cohort Astigmatina (27 species) which comprised species considered as allergenic (e.g., Acarus siro complex, Tyrophagus putrescentiae, Lepidoglyphus destructor, Glycy- phagus domesticus, Chortoglyphus arcuatus and Gymnoglyphus longior). Species of the families Acaridae (A. siro, A. farris and A. immobilis), Glycyphagidae (G. domesticus, L. destructor and L. michaeli) and Chortoglyphidae (C. arcuatus) have been found as numeri- cally dominant among astigmatid mites. The majority of mites were found in cowsheds (approx. 32%) and in pigsties (25.9%). The remaining mites were found in barns (19.6%), chaff-cutter buildings (13.9%) and poultry houses (8.8%).
    [Show full text]
  • PDF 25 Kb) Approved the Final Manuscript
    Bajda et al. BMC Genomics (2015) 16:974 DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2157-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Transcriptome profiling of a spirodiclofen susceptible and resistant strain of the European red mite Panonychus ulmi using strand-specific RNA-seq Sabina Bajda1†, Wannes Dermauw2*† , Robert Greenhalgh3, Ralf Nauen4, Luc Tirry2, Richard M. Clark3,5 and Thomas Van Leeuwen1,2* Abstract Background: The European red mite, Panonychus ulmi, is among the most important mite pests in fruit orchards, where it is controlled primarily by acaricide application. However, the species rapidly develops pesticide resistance, and the elucidation of resistance mechanisms for P. ulmi has not kept pace with insects or with the closely related spider mite Tetranychus urticae. The main reason for this lack of knowledge has been the absence of genomic resources needed to investigate the molecular biology of resistance mechanisms. Results: Here, we provide a comprehensive strand-specific RNA-seq based transcriptome resource for P. ulmi derived from strains susceptible and resistant to the widely used acaricide spirodiclofen. From a de novo assembly of the P. ulmi transcriptome, we manually annotated detoxification enzyme families, target-sites of commonly used acaricides, and horizontally transferred genes implicated in plant-mite interactions and pesticide resistance. In a comparative analysis that incorporated sequences available for Panonychus citri, T. urticae, and insects, we identified radiations for detoxification gene families following the divergence of Panonychus and Tetranychus genera. Finally, we used the replicated RNA-seq data from the spirodiclofen susceptible and resistant strains to describe gene expression changes associated with resistance. A cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, as well as multiple carboxylcholinesterases, were differentially expressed between the susceptible and resistant strains, and provide a molecular entry point for understanding resistance to spirodiclofen, widely used to control P.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface to a Special Volume of Acarological Papers in Memory of Ekaterina Alekseevna Sidorchuk (1981–2019)
    Zootaxa 4647 (1): 006–013 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Editorial ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4647.1.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D3886B92-825A-4274-9A5F-BA9B7E3E2F1B Preface to a special volume of acarological papers in memory of Ekaterina Alekseevna Sidorchuk (1981–2019) ZHI-QIANG ZHANG1, 2 1 Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, Auckland, New Zealand. Email: [email protected] 2 Centre for Biodiversity & Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand The acarological and palaeontological communities lost a rising star when Dr Ekaterina Alekseevna (Katya) Sidor- chuk passed away in a tragic accident while diving in the Maldives on 20 January 2019. Katya was a good colleague of many acarologists and much-loved friend of numerous collaborators. She was a highly-valued member of the editing team of Zootaxa, serving as a subject editor for Oribatida (Acari) for several years; her excellent editorial contributions were greatly appreciated by many colleagues and friends. To honour Katya, her colleagues and friends of the acarological world dedicate here a special volume of Zootaxa in her memory. This memorial volume collects 28 papers on a variety of topics and taxa (both fossil and extant), including 11 papers on Prostigmata (Fan et al. 2019; Ghasemi-Moghadam et al. 2019; Hajiqanbar et al. 2019; Khaustov et al. 2019; Khaustov & Frolov 2019; Lindquist & Sidorchuk 2019; Porta et al. 2019; Seeman 2019; Sidorchuk et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2019; Zmudzinski et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests
    EPPO quarantine pest Prepared by CABI and EPPO for the EU under Contract 90/399003 Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests Oligonychus perditus IDENTITY Name: Oligonychus perditus Pritchard & Baker Synonyms: Oligonychus chamaecyparisae Ma & Yuan Taxonomic position:Arachnida: Acarina: Prostigmata: Tetranychidae Common names: Byakushin-hadani (Japanese) Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature: O. perditus is very closely related to the cosmopolitan and morphologically variable O. ununguis (Jacobi), but Mitrofanov et al. (1975) did not regard it as part of the "ununguis complex". Bayer computer code: OLIGPD EPPO A1 list: No. 217 EU Annex designation: II/A1 HOSTS All known host plants are conifers, mainly of the family Cupressaceae: Chamaecyparis pisifera, Juniperus chinensis, J. formosana, Thuja orientalis. Taxus cuspidata and Cryptomeria japonica have also been recorded as hosts. In a glasshouse environment, the mite was successfully reared on J. communis, J. x media, J. sabina, J. virginiana and Thuja orientalis. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION EPPO region: Netherlands (intercepted only). Asia: China (Ma & Yuan, 1976), Hong Kong, Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu), Korea Republic (Lee et al., 1989), Taiwan (Lo & Ho, 1989). North America: USA (intercepted only). The species was described on intercepted material by Pritchard & Baker (1955). EU: Absent. BIOLOGY No research has been done on biological or ecological features of O. perditus such as reproduction rate, predators or overwintering capacity. These are most likely to be comparable with those of O. ununguis. On intercepted bonsai material of J. chinensis in the Netherlands, O. perditus overwintered in the egg stage, as O. ununguis does also. In Japan, diapause was induced in O. ununguis by the influence of two factors: day length and food supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Clover Mite Clover Mite Facts
    BARRIER PEST CONTROL JUNE 14, 2021 Pest Bio Providing All Your Pest Facts Clover Mite Clover Mite Facts: Size: 0.75-0.85 mm Shape: Oval Color: Bright Red to Reddish Brown Legs: 8 Wings: No Antenna: No Scientific Name: These tiny red pests invade homes in the thousands, getting through the tiniest cracks and crevices. Kingdom: Although Clover Mites ate only 1/30th of an inch big they are actually one of the largest mites found. Clover Mites are commonly mistaken as an insect as their -Animalia front legs are very long and look more like antenna. Clover mites are not harmful Pylum: to people and do not bite. Clover Mites are parthenogenetic, which means they develop from unfertilized eggs and are all female. Clover mites are attracted to -Arthropoda water so having a pool, bird bath or even just a well soaked lawn can attract them. Class: Call Barrier for help 208-463-4533 managing Clover Mites! -Arachnida Order: BEHAVIOR HABITAT -Trombidiformes DIET Because of the Clover Clover mites prefer to live Mites love of sunshine Family: Clover mites feed on in well fertilized and they tend to gather on plants. They eat by watered lawns. Adult sunny southern and -Tetranychidae sucking plant juices from Clover mites like to eastern walls of homes clover, grasses and other congregate on walls and and can enter the home Genus: plants common in lawns. vegetation, especially from the smallest of when exposed to sunlight. -Bryobia cracks . 1.
    [Show full text]
  • NDP 39 Hazelnut Big Bud Mite
    NDP ## V# - National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytoptus avellanae National Diagnostic Protocol Phytoptus avellanae Nalepa Hazelnut big bud mite NDP 39 V1 NDP 39 V1 - National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytoptus avellanae © Commonwealth of Australia Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. This publication (and any material sourced from it) should be attributed as: Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2017). National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytoptus avellanae – NDP39 V1. (Eds. Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics) Author Davies, J; Reviewer Knihinicki, D. ISBN 978-0-9945113-9-3 CC BY 3.0. Cataloguing data Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2017). National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytoptus avellanae NDP39 V1. (Eds. Subcommittee on Plant Health
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Amblyseius Andersoni (Chant) As a Potential Biocontrol Agent Against Phytophagous Mites Occurring on Coniferous Plants
    insects Article A Preliminary Assessment of Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) as a Potential Biocontrol Agent against Phytophagous Mites Occurring on Coniferous Plants Ewa Puchalska 1,* , Stanisław Kamil Zagrodzki 1, Marcin Kozak 2, Brian G. Rector 3 and Anna Mauer 1 1 Section of Applied Entomology, Department of Plant Protection, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] (S.K.Z.); [email protected] (A.M.) 2 Department of Media, Journalism and Social Communication, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225 Rzeszów, Poland; [email protected] 3 USDA-ARS, Great Basin Rangelands Research Unit, 920 Valley Rd., Reno, NV 89512, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) is a predatory mite frequently used as a biocontrol agent against phytophagous mites in greenhouses, orchards and vineyards. In Europe, it is an indige- nous species, commonly found on various plants, including conifers. The present study examined whether A. andersoni can develop and reproduce while feeding on two key pests of ornamental coniferous plants, i.e., Oligonychus ununguis (Jacobi) and Pentamerismus taxi (Haller). Pinus sylvestris L. pollen was also tested as an alternative food source for the predator. Both prey species and pine pollen were suitable food sources for A. andersoni. Although higher values of population parameters Citation: Puchalska, E.; were observed when the predator fed on mites compared to the pollen alternative, we conclude that Zagrodzki, S.K.; Kozak, M.; pine pollen may provide adequate sustenance for A.
    [Show full text]
  • Spruce Spider Mite
    2/16/2021 Spruce Spider Mite HOME | SPRUCE SPIDER MITE Spruce Spider Mite The spruce spider mite attacks spruce, arborvitae, juniper, hemlock, pine, Douglas-fir, and occasionally other conifers. ARTICLES | UPDATED: MARCH 23, 2017 Oligonychus ununguis (Jacobi) Introduction The spruce spider mite is considered one of the most destructive spider mites in the United States. It injures the foliage of spruce, arborvitae, juniper, hemlock, pine, Douglas-fir, and occasionally other USDA Forest Service - Region 4 - Intermountain, USDA conifers. Dwarf Alberta Forest Service, Bugwood.org spruce, Picea glauca 'Conica', is one of this pest's preferred host plants. Description After hatching, the young, pale green mites called larvae resemble adults except they are smaller and have only three pairs of legs. As the mites mature, they shed their skins three times before becoming adults. Adults and nymphs have four pairs of legs and are dark green to nearly black with the body surface clothed with salmon pink-colored spines (Fig. 1). The adult's legs are also salmon pink. https://extension.psu.edu/spruce-spider-mite 1/3 2/16/2021 Spruce Spider Mite Life History This key pest overwinters as brown eggs tucked in and around bud scales and at the base of needles. These hatch in the spring, usually before new growth starts. A generation from egg to adult may require 15-20 days and generations frequently overlap so that all stages may be found on host plants during late spring and early summer. There are 7-10 generations produced each year. Damage This species damages host plants by sucking plant fluid from needles as they feed.
    [Show full text]
  • Phragmites Australis
    Journal of Ecology 2017, 105, 1123–1162 doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12797 BIOLOGICAL FLORA OF THE BRITISH ISLES* No. 283 List Vasc. PI. Br. Isles (1992) no. 153, 64,1 Biological Flora of the British Isles: Phragmites australis Jasmin G. Packer†,1,2,3, Laura A. Meyerson4, Hana Skalov a5, Petr Pysek 5,6,7 and Christoph Kueffer3,7 1Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 2School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 3Institute of Integrative Biology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, CH-8092, Zurich,€ Switzerland; 4University of Rhode Island, Natural Resources Science, Kingston, RI 02881, USA; 5Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-25243, Pruhonice, Czech Republic; 6Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, CZ-12844, Prague 2, Czech Republic; and 7Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa Summary 1. This account presents comprehensive information on the biology of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. (P. communis Trin.; common reed) that is relevant to understanding its ecological char- acteristics and behaviour. The main topics are presented within the standard framework of the Biologi- cal Flora of the British Isles: distribution, habitat, communities, responses to biotic factors and to the abiotic environment, plant structure and physiology, phenology, floral and seed characters, herbivores and diseases, as well as history including invasive spread in other regions, and conservation. 2. Phragmites australis is a cosmopolitan species native to the British flora and widespread in lowland habitats throughout, from the Shetland archipelago to southern England.
    [Show full text]
  • Diverse Mite Family Acaridae
    Disentangling Species Boundaries and the Evolution of Habitat Specialization for the Ecologically Diverse Mite Family Acaridae by Pamela Murillo-Rojas A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Thomas F. Duda Jr, Chair Assistant Professor Alison R. Davis-Rabosky Associate Professor Johannes Foufopoulos Professor Emeritus Barry M. OConnor Pamela Murillo-Rojas [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7823-7302 © Pamela Murillo-Rojas 2019 Dedication To my husband Juan M. for his support since day one, for leaving all his life behind to join me in this journey and because you always believed in me ii Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to say thanks to the University of Michigan, the Rackham Graduate School and mostly to the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology for all their support during all these years. To all the funding sources of the University of Michigan that made possible to complete this dissertation and let me take part of different scientific congresses through Block Grants, Rackham Graduate Student Research Grants, Rackham International Research Award (RIRA), Rackham One Term Fellowship and the Hinsdale-Walker scholarship. I also want to thank Fulbright- LASPAU fellowship, the University of Costa Rica (OAICE-08-CAB-147-2013), and Consejo Nacional para Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICIT-Costa Rica, FI- 0161-13) for all the financial support. I would like to thank, all specialists that help me with the identification of some hosts for the mites: Brett Ratcliffe at the University of Nebraska State Museum, Lincoln, NE, identified the dynastine scarabs.
    [Show full text]
  • General Pest Management: a Guide for Commercial Applicators, Category 7A, and Return It to the Pesticide Education Program Office, Michigan State University Extension
    General Pest Management A Guide for Commercial Applicators Extension Bulletin E -2048 • October 1998, Major revision-destroy old stock • Michigan State University Extension General Pest Management A Guide for Commercial Applicators Category 7A Editor: Carolyn Randall Extension Associate Pesticide Education Program Michigan State University Technical Consultants: Melvin Poplar, Program Manager John Haslem Insect and Rodent Management Pest Management Supervisor Michigan Department of Agriculture Michigan State University Adapted from Urban Integrated Pest Management, A Guide for Commercial Applicators, written by Dr. Eugene Wood, Dept. of Entomology, University of Maryland; and Lawrence Pinto, Pinto & Associates; edited by Jann Cox, DUAL & Associates, Inc. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Certification and Training Branch by DUAL & Associates, Arlington, Va., February 1991. General Pest Management i Preface Acknowledgements We acknowledge the main source of information for Natural History Survey for the picture of a mole (Figure this manual, the EPA manual Urban Integrated Pest 19.8). Management, from which most of the information on structure-infesting and invading pests, and vertebrates We acknowledge numerous reviewers of the manu- was taken. script including Mark Sheperdigian of Rose Exterminator Co., Bob England of Terminix, Jerry Hatch of Eradico We also acknowledge the technical assistance of Mel Services Inc., David Laughlin of Aardvark Pest Control, Poplar, Program Manager for the Michigan Department Ted Bruesch of LiphaTech, Val Smitter of Smitter Pest of Agriculture’s (MDA) Insect and Rodent Management Control, Dan Lyden of Eradico Services Inc., Tim Regal of and John Haslem, Pest Management Supervisor at Orkin Exterminators, Kevin Clark of Clarks Critter Michigan State University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diversity and Ecology of Mites (Acari) in Vineyards
    The Diversity and Ecology of Mites (Acari) in Vineyards Mia Vermaak Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master in Conservation Ecology at the Stellenbosch University Supervisors: Dr Pia Addison Department of Conservation Ecology & Entomology Stellenbosch University Dr Ruan Veldtman South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) South Africa Prof Eddie Ueckermann Retired Acarologist South Africa April 2019 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION By submitting this thesis, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third- party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: December 2018 Copyright © 2019 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ABSTRACT The common grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) is the main species used for wine making, with South Africa being one of the top wine exporting countries. Grapevine is vulnerable to a range of pests, one of these being mites. Plant-parasitic mites are extremely damaging pests with a rapid generation time, high fecundity and a tendency to over-exploit their hosts. Disconcertingly, the diversity of mites in vineyards in South Africa is virtually unknown. Surveys have been done with predatory mites and phytophagous mites being recorded, but no recent studies focussing on their ecology, pest status and seasonal cycles have been collected. The aim of this study was to survey phytophagous and predatory mite diversity and to investigate pest status of the plant feeding mites of South African grapevine, including the recently introduced, invasive Brevipalpus lewisi.
    [Show full text]