An Efficient Recombination System for Chromosome Engineering in Escherichia Coli

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Efficient Recombination System for Chromosome Engineering in Escherichia Coli An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli Daiguan Yu*, Hilary M. Ellis*, E-Chiang Lee†, Nancy A. Jenkins†, Neal G. Copeland†, and Donald L. Court*‡ *Gene Regulation and Chromosome Biology Laboratory and †Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Institute, Division of Basic Science, National Cancer Institute͞Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, MD 21702 Communicated by Allan Campbell, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, March 22, 2000 (received for review January 19, 2000) A recombination system has been developed for efficient chromo- frequencies of recombination with linear DNA containing long some engineering in Escherichia coli by using electroporated linear homologies by transforming in the presence of the bacteriophage DNA. A defective ␭ prophage supplies functions that protect and ␭ recombination functions (Exo and Beta) in a bacterial recBCD recombine an electroporated linear DNA substrate in the bacterial mutant background. This ␭ recombination system, like yeast, cell. The use of recombination eliminates the requirement for uses double strand break repair (10, 11). In a recBC sbcA strain, standard cloning as all novel joints are engineered by chemical short regions of homology can function in recombination of synthesis in vitro and the linear DNA is efficiently recombined into linear DNA; however, recombination is inefficient (12). In recϩ place in vivo. The technology and manipulations required are backgrounds, gene replacement on the chromosome has been simple and straightforward. A temperature-dependent repressor accomplished by integration and excision of episomes carrying tightly controls prophage expression, and, thus, recombination bacterial homology (13, 14). functions can be transiently supplied by shifting cultures to 42°C To obtain efficient recombination of linear donor DNA in for 15 min. The efficient prophage recombination system does not recAϩ or recAϪ backgrounds, an E. coli strain was made that require host RecA function and depends primarily on Exo, Beta, and contains a ␭ prophage harboring the recombination genes exo, Gam functions expressed from the defective ␭ prophage. The bet, and gam under control of a temperature-sensitive ␭ cI- defective prophage can be moved to other strains and can be easily repressor (Fig. 1). The exo, bet, and gam genes can be easily removed from any strain. Gene disruptions and modifications of switched on at 42°C and off at 32°C. When ␭ functions are turned both the bacterial chromosome and bacterial plasmids are possible. on for as short a time as 5 min, cells become more recombino- This system will be especially useful for the engineering of large genic and take up linear DNA without its destruction. Gam bacterial plasmids such as those from bacterial artificial chromo- inhibits the RecBCD nuclease from attacking linear DNA, and some libraries. Exo and Beta generate recombination activity for that linear DNA. More importantly, this recombination is proficient with NA engineering is conducted routinely in Escherichia coli, DNA homologies as short as 30–50 bp on the ends of linear DNA Dnot only for genetic studies in bacteria, but also for con- substrates. structing DNA molecules to be used in studies of other organ- isms. Most cloning methods use restriction endonuclease cleav- Materials and Methods age followed by DNA joining with DNA ligase. These in vitro Bacterial Strains. Bacterial strains used in this work are listed in cleavage and joining reactions are the basis for creating DNA Table 1. Strain DY329 was constructed by transduction of recombinants and for cloning of DNA segments on plasmid ZH1141 with P1 phage grown on WJW23 (see Table 1), selecting vectors in which additional modification and amplification can for nadA::Tn10 tetracycline resistance (TetR) at 32°C and then take place. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, strategies that screening for the presence of a defective ␭ prophage, which generate novel DNA junctions exploit homologous recombina- causes temperature-sensitive cell growth at 42°C. Similar P1 tion (1). The DNA double-strand break and repair recombina- transduction was used to create other strains described in Table tion pathway is very efficient in yeast. Functions in this pathway 1 using standard media, methods, and selections (15). recombine transformed linear DNA with homologous DNA in the yeast cell. Moreover, this recombination is proficient with Induction of ␭ Recombination Functions and Preparation of Electro- short synthetic oligonucleotides, thereby permitting recombi- poration-Competent Cells. Overnight cultures grown at 32°C from nant DNA to be generated in vivo without using DNA restriction isolated colonies were diluted 50-fold in LB medium and were ϭ and ligation (2–4). However, subsequent manipulation of re- grown at 32°C with shaking to an OD600 0.4–0.6. Induction was combinant DNA molecules in yeast, as opposed to E. coli,is performed on a 10-ml culture in a baffled conical flask (50 ml) laborious, especially if it is to be used for recombinant DNA work by placing the flask in a water bath at 42°C with shaking (200 in other organisms. revolutions͞min) for 15 min. Immediately after the 15-min Unlike yeast, E. coli is not readily transformed by linear DNA induction, the flask was swirled in an ice water slurry to cool for fragments due in part to the rapid degradation of the DNA by 10 min. An uninduced control culture was also placed into the the intracellular RecBCD exonuclease (5). Mutant recBCD ice slurry. The cooled 10 ml cultures were centrifuged for 8 min strains lacking the exonuclease do not rapidly degrade linear at 5,500 ϫ g at 4°C. Each cell pellet was suspended in 1 ml of DNA; however, such strains are extremely poor growing, are ice-cold sterile water, was transferred to a 1.5-ml Eppendorf defective for recombination, and do not support efficient rep- lication of the many plasmids used in recombinant DNA work. In certain recAϩ backgrounds, the recBCD defect for recombi- Abbreviation: BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome. nation is suppressed, allowing linear DNA to be taken up by the ‡To whom reprint requests should be addressed at: Building 539͞Room 243, National ͞ cell and to be recombined (6). Other homologous recombination Cancer Institute, Division of Basic Science, National Cancer Institute Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, MD 21702. E-mail: [email protected]. strategies in E. coli recBC derivatives have been applied to ͞ The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This generate recombinants between homologies on linear and or article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. circular plasmids (7, 8). Still, recombinants are rare, the recom- §1734 solely to indicate this fact. bination generally uses thousands of base pairs of homology, and Article published online before print: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073͞pnas.100127597. plasmids are poorly maintained. Murphy (9) reported the highest Article and publication date are at www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.100127597 5978–5983 ͉ PNAS ͉ May 23, 2000 ͉ vol. 97 ͉ no. 11 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 Fig. 1. Description of the defective ␭ prophage on the E. coli chromosome. The defective prophage contains ␭ genes from cI to int. A deletion (dotted line) removes the right side of the prophage from cro through attR and including bioA (21). On the chromosome, the nadA and gal operons are to the left of the prophage, and the bio genes without bioA are to the right. Genes of the ␭ prophage are shown on the solid line, and genes of the host are shown on the broken line. pL and pR indicate the early left and right promoters of ␭. attL and attR indicate the left and right attachment sites of ␭. The ␭ genes and functions have been described (17). tube, and was spun for 20 sec at 4°C at maximum speed in a the template DNA will generate the selected phenotype (i.e., the microfuge. After washing the cell pellets as described two more template is a plasmid), the template must be eliminated. Plasmid times, the cells were suspended in 100 ␮l of ice-cold sterile water. template DNA can be destroyed by treatment with DpnI after This volume of competent cells is sufficient for two standard the PCR; DpnI cuts methylated GATC template DNA, leaving electroporation reactions (Ϸ108 cells per reaction). Larger cul- the newly replicated unmethylated DNA intact. Once a linear tures can be prepared for a greater number of reactions or for cassette has been generated, it can be stored and used as the Ϫ storage of electrocompetent cells at 80°C with 12% glycerol template for all subsequent PCRs. present. Fresh competent cells give highest efficiencies of re- combination and were used here. Cell Transformation. Purified linear donor DNA (1–10 ␮l) was mixed with competent cells in a final volume of 50 ␮l on ice and Preparation of Linear DNA Cassettes. Standard PCR conditions then was pipetted into a precooled electroporation cuvette (0.1 were used to amplify linear DNA fragments with the Expand cm). The amount of donor DNA used per reaction (usually 1–100 High Fidelity PCR system of Boehringer Mannheim. The chlor- R ng) is indicated for relevant experiments. Electroporation was amphenicol-resistant (Cm ) cassette cat was amplified from performed by using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser set at 1.8 kV, 25 ␮F pPCR-Script Cam (Stratagene) with primers 5ЈTGTGAC- Ј with Pulse controller of 200 ohms. Two protocols have been used GGAAGATCACTTCG and 5 ACCAGCAATAGACA- interchangeably to allow segregation of recombinant from pa- TAAGCG. The tetracycline-resistant (TetR) cassette tet was rental chromosomes within the electroporated cells. In both amplified from Tn10 with primers 5ЈCAAGAGGGTCAT- protocols, the electroporated cells were immediately diluted TATATTTCG and 5ЈACTCGACATCTTGGTTACCG. The with 1 ml of LB medium. In one, the cells were incubated for 1–2 ampicillin-resistant (ApR) cassette amp was amplified from pBluescript SK(ϩ) (Stratagene) with primers 5ЈCAT- h at 32°C before selecting for recombinants.
Recommended publications
  • Mobile Genetic Elements in Streptococci
    Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. (2019) 32: 123-166. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21775/cimb.032.123 Mobile Genetic Elements in Streptococci Miao Lu#, Tao Gong#, Anqi Zhang, Boyu Tang, Jiamin Chen, Zhong Zhang, Yuqing Li*, Xuedong Zhou* State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China. #Miao Lu and Tao Gong contributed equally to this work. *Address correspondence to: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Streptococci are a group of Gram-positive bacteria belonging to the family Streptococcaceae, which are responsible of multiple diseases. Some of these species can cause invasive infection that may result in life-threatening illness. Moreover, antibiotic-resistant bacteria are considerably increasing, thus imposing a global consideration. One of the main causes of this resistance is the horizontal gene transfer (HGT), associated to gene transfer agents including transposons, integrons, plasmids and bacteriophages. These agents, which are called mobile genetic elements (MGEs), encode proteins able to mediate DNA movements. This review briefly describes MGEs in streptococci, focusing on their structure and properties related to HGT and antibiotic resistance. caister.com/cimb 123 Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. (2019) Vol. 32 Mobile Genetic Elements Lu et al Introduction Streptococci are a group of Gram-positive bacteria widely distributed across human and animals. Unlike the Staphylococcus species, streptococci are catalase negative and are subclassified into the three subspecies alpha, beta and gamma according to the partial, complete or absent hemolysis induced, respectively. The beta hemolytic streptococci species are further classified by the cell wall carbohydrate composition (Lancefield, 1933) and according to human diseases in Lancefield groups A, B, C and G.
    [Show full text]
  • Recombinant DNA and Elements Utilizing Recombinant DNA Such As Plasmids and Viral Vectors, and the Application of Recombinant DNA Techniques in Molecular Biology
    Fact Sheet Describing Recombinant DNA and Elements Utilizing Recombinant DNA Such as Plasmids and Viral Vectors, and the Application of Recombinant DNA Techniques in Molecular Biology Compiled and/or written by Amy B. Vento and David R. Gillum Office of Environmental Health and Safety University of New Hampshire June 3, 2002 Introduction Recombinant DNA (rDNA) has various definitions, ranging from very simple to strangely complex. The following are three examples of how recombinant DNA is defined: 1. A DNA molecule containing DNA originating from two or more sources. 2. DNA that has been artificially created. It is DNA from two or more sources that is incorporated into a single recombinant molecule. 3. According to the NIH guidelines, recombinant DNA are molecules constructed outside of living cells by joining natural or synthetic DNA segments to DNA molecules that can replicate in a living cell, or molecules that result from their replication. Description of rDNA Recombinant DNA, also known as in vitro recombination, is a technique involved in creating and purifying desired genes. Molecular cloning (i.e. gene cloning) involves creating recombinant DNA and introducing it into a host cell to be replicated. One of the basic strategies of molecular cloning is to move desired genes from a large, complex genome to a small, simple one. The process of in vitro recombination makes it possible to cut different strands of DNA, in vitro (outside the cell), with a restriction enzyme and join the DNA molecules together via complementary base pairing. Techniques Some of the molecular biology techniques utilized during recombinant DNA include: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Piggybac Transposase Tools for Genome Engineering.Pdf
    piggyBac transposase tools for genome engineering PNAS PLUS Xianghong Lia,b, Erin R. Burnightc, Ashley L. Cooneyd, Nirav Malanie, Troy Bradye, Jeffry D. Sanderf,g, Janice Staberd, Sarah J. Wheelanh, J. Keith Joungf,g, Paul B. McCray, Jr.c,d, Frederic D. Bushmane, Patrick L. Sinnd,1, and Nancy L. Craiga,b,1 aHoward Hughes Medical Institute and bDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; cGenetics Program, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; dDepartment of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; eDepartment of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; fMolecular Pathology Unit, Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02129; gDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; and hDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205 Edited by Richard A. Young, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved May 1, 2013 (received for review December 30, 2012) The transposon piggyBac is being used increasingly for genetic stud- site-directed mutagenesis of the PB catalytic domain and isolated − ies. Here, we describe modified versions of piggyBac transposase an excision competent/integration defective (Exc+Int ) PB. We − that have potentially wide-ranging applications, such as reversible also find that introduction of the Exc+Int mutations into a hy- − transgenesis and modified targeting of insertions. piggyBac is dis- peractive version of PB (5, 8, 15) yields an Exc+Int transposase tinguished by its ability to excise precisely, restoring the donor site whose excision frequency is five- to six-fold higher than that of to its pretransposon state.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizontal Gene Transfer
    Genetic Variation: The genetic substrate for natural selection Horizontal Gene Transfer Dr. Carol E. Lee, University of Wisconsin Copyright ©2020; Do not upload without permission What about organisms that do not have sexual reproduction? In prokaryotes: Horizontal gene transfer (HGT): Also termed Lateral Gene Transfer - the lateral transmission of genes between individual cells, either directly or indirectly. Could include transformation, transduction, and conjugation. This transfer of genes between organisms occurs in a manner distinct from the vertical transmission of genes from parent to offspring via sexual reproduction. These mechanisms not only generate new gene assortments, they also help move genes throughout populations and from species to species. HGT has been shown to be an important factor in the evolution of many organisms. From some basic background on prokaryotic genome architecture Smaller Population Size • Differences in genome architecture (noncoding, nonfunctional) (regulatory sequence) (transcribed sequence) General Principles • Most conserved feature of Prokaryotes is the operon • Gene Order: Prokaryotic gene order is not conserved (aside from order within the operon), whereas in Eukaryotes gene order tends to be conserved across taxa • Intron-exon genomic organization: The distinctive feature of eukaryotic genomes that sharply separates them from prokaryotic genomes is the presence of spliceosomal introns that interrupt protein-coding genes Small vs. Large Genomes 1. Compact, relatively small genomes of viruses, archaea, bacteria (typically, <10Mb), and many unicellular eukaryotes (typically, <20 Mb). In these genomes, protein-coding and RNA-coding sequences occupy most of the genomic sequence. 2. Expansive, large genomes of multicellular and some unicellular eukaryotes (typically, >100 Mb). In these genomes, the majority of the nucleotide sequence is non-coding.
    [Show full text]
  • Transduction by Bacteriophage Ti * Henry Drexler
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 1083-1088, August 1970 Transduction by Bacteriophage Ti * Henry Drexler DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY, BOWMAN GRAY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA Communicated by Edward L. Tatum, May 25, 1970 Abstract. Amber mutants of the virulent coliphage T1 are able to transduce a wide variety of genetic characteristics from permissive to nonpermissive K strains of Escherichia coli. The virulent coliphage T1 is not known to be related to any temperate phage. Certain of the characteristics of T1 seem to be incompatible with its potential existence as a temperate phage; for example, the average latent period for T1 is only 13 min' and about 70% of its DNA is derived from the host.2 In order to demonstrate transduction by T1 it is necessray to provide condi- tions in which potential transductants are able to survive; this is accomplished by using amber mutants of T1 to transduce nonpermissive recipients. Experi- ments which show that T1 is a transducing phage are presented and have been designed chiefly to illustrate the following points: (1) Infection by T1 is able to cause heritable changes in recipients; (2) the genotype of the donor host is im- portant in determining what characteristics can be transferred to recipients; (3) the changes in the recipients are not caused by transformation; and (4) there is a similarity between the transducing activity and the plaque-forming ability of T1 with respect to serology, host range, and density. Materials and Methods. Bacterial strains: The abbreviations and symbols of Demerec et al.3 and Taylor and Trotter4 are used to describe all pertinent genotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Engineering and Sustainable Crop Disease Management: Opportunities for Case-By-Case Decision-Making
    sustainability Review Genetic Engineering and Sustainable Crop Disease Management: Opportunities for Case-by-Case Decision-Making Paul Vincelli Department of Plant Pathology, 207 Plant Science Building, College of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA; [email protected] Academic Editor: Sean Clark Received: 22 March 2016; Accepted: 13 May 2016; Published: 20 May 2016 Abstract: Genetic engineering (GE) offers an expanding array of strategies for enhancing disease resistance of crop plants in sustainable ways, including the potential for reduced pesticide usage. Certain GE applications involve transgenesis, in some cases creating a metabolic pathway novel to the GE crop. In other cases, only cisgenessis is employed. In yet other cases, engineered genetic changes can be so minimal as to be indistinguishable from natural mutations. Thus, GE crops vary substantially and should be evaluated for risks, benefits, and social considerations on a case-by-case basis. Deployment of GE traits should be with an eye towards long-term sustainability; several options are discussed. Selected risks and concerns of GE are also considered, along with genome editing, a technology that greatly expands the capacity of molecular biologists to make more precise and targeted genetic edits. While GE is merely a suite of tools to supplement other breeding techniques, if wisely used, certain GE tools and applications can contribute to sustainability goals. Keywords: biotechnology; GMO (genetically modified organism) 1. Introduction and Background Disease management practices can contribute to sustainability by protecting crop yields, maintaining and improving profitability for crop producers, reducing losses along the distribution chain, and reducing the negative environmental impacts of diseases and their management.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of DNA Technology 1865 - Gregor Mendel the Father of Genetics
    A Short History of DNA Technology 1865 - Gregor Mendel The Father of Genetics The Augustinian monastery in old Brno, Moravia 1865 - Gregor Mendel • Law of Segregation • Law of Independent Assortment • Law of Dominance 1865 1915 - T.H. Morgan Genetics of Drosophila • Short generation time • Easy to maintain • Only 4 pairs of chromosomes 1865 1915 - T.H. Morgan •Genes located on chromosomes •Sex-linked inheritance wild type mutant •Gene linkage 0 •Recombination long aristae short aristae •Genetic mapping gray black body 48.5 body (cross-over maps) 57.5 red eyes cinnabar eyes 67.0 normal wings vestigial wings 104.5 red eyes brown eyes 1865 1928 - Frederick Griffith “Rough” colonies “Smooth” colonies Transformation of Streptococcus pneumoniae Living Living Heat killed Heat killed S cells mixed S cells R cells S cells with living R cells capsule Living S cells in blood Bacterial sample from dead mouse Strain Injection Results 1865 Beadle & Tatum - 1941 One Gene - One Enzyme Hypothesis Neurospora crassa Ascus Ascospores placed X-rays Fruiting on complete body medium All grow Minimal + amino acids No growth Minimal Minimal + vitamins in mutants Fragments placed on minimal medium Minimal plus: Mutant deficient in enzyme that synthesizes arginine Cys Glu Arg Lys His 1865 Beadle & Tatum - 1941 Gene A Gene B Gene C Minimal Medium + Citruline + Arginine + Ornithine Wild type PrecursorEnz A OrnithineEnz B CitrulineEnz C Arginine Metabolic block Class I Precursor OrnithineEnz B CitrulineEnz C Arginine Mutants Class II Mutants PrecursorEnz A Ornithine
    [Show full text]
  • Recombination in Bacteria
    Recombination in Bacteria 1. Conjugation DNA from a donor cell is transferred to a recipient cell through a conjugation tube (pili). 2. Transformation Uptake of naked DNA molecule from remains of one bacterium (donor cell) by another bacterium (recipient cell). 3. Transduction Bacterial genes are carried from a donor cell to a recipient cell by a bacteriophage. { Generalized { Specialized Conjugation Ability to conjugate located on the F-plasmid F+ Cells act as donors F- Cells act as recipients F+/F- Conjugation: { F Factor “replicates off” a single strand of DNA. { New strand goes through pili to recipient cell. { New strand is made double stranded. { If entire F-plasmid crosses, then recipient cell becomes F+, otherwise nothing happens Conjugation with Hfr Hfr cell (High Frequency Recombination) cells have F-plasmid integrated into the Chromosome. Integration into the Chromosome is unique for each F-plasmid strain. When F-plasmid material is replicated and sent across pili, Chromosomal material is included. (Figure 6.10 in Klug & Cummings) When chromosomal material is in recipient cell, recombination can occur: { Recombination is double stranded. { Donor genes are recombined into the recipient cell. { Corresponding genes from recipient cell are recombined out of the chromosome and reabsorbed by the cell. Interrupted Mating Mapping 1. Allow conjugation to start Genes closest to the origin of replication site (in the direction of replication) are moved through the pili first. 2. After a set time, interrupt conjugation Only those genes closest to the origin of replication site will conjugate. The long the time, the more that is able to conjugate. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Genetics by Dr Preeti Bajpai
    Dr. Preeti Bajpai Genes: an overview ▪ A gene is the functional unit of heredity ▪ Each chromosome carry a linear array of multiple genes ▪ Each gene represents segment of DNA responsible for synthesis of RNA or protein product ▪ A gene is considered to be unit of genetic information that controls specific aspect of phenotype DNA Chromosome Gene Protein-1 Prokaryotic Courtesy: Team Shrub https://twitter.com/realscientists/status/927 cell 667237145767937 Genetic exchange within Prokaryotes The genetic exchange occurring in bacteria involve transfers of genes from one bacterium to another. The gene transfer in prokaryotic cells is thus unidirectional and the recombination events usually occur between a fragment of one chromosome (from a donor cell) and a complete chromosome (in a recipient cell) Mechanisms for genetic exchange Bacteria exchange genetic material through three different parasexual processes* namely transformation, conjugation and transduction. *Parasexual process involves recombination of genes from genetically distinct cells occurring without involvement of meiosis and fertilization Principles of Genetics-sixth edition Courtesy: Beatrice the Biologist.com by D. Peter Snustad & Michael J. Simmons (http://www.beatricebiologist.com/2014/08/bacterial-gifts/) Transformation: an introduction Transformation involves the uptake of free DNA molecules released from one bacterium (the donor cell) by another bacterium (the recipient cell). Frederick Griffith discovered transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) in 1928. In his experiments, Griffith used two related strains of bacteria, known as R and S. The R bacteria (nonvirulent) formed colonies, or clumps of related bacteria, that Frederick Griffith 1877-1941 had a rough appearance (hence the abbreviation "R"). The S bacteria (virulent) formed colonies that were rounded and smooth (hence the abbreviation "S").
    [Show full text]
  • Barriers to Adoption of GM Crops
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Creative Components Dissertations Fall 2021 Barriers to Adoption of GM Crops Madeline Esquivel Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents Part of the Agricultural Education Commons Recommended Citation Esquivel, Madeline, "Barriers to Adoption of GM Crops" (2021). Creative Components. 731. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents/731 This Creative Component is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Creative Components by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Barriers to Adoption of GM Crops By Madeline M. Esquivel A Creative Component submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Plant Breeding Program of Study Committee: Walter Suza, Major Professor Thomas Lübberstedt Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2021 1 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3 2. What is a Genetically Modified Organism?................................................................................ 9 2.1 The Development of Modern Varieties and Genetically Modified Crops .......................... 10 2.2 GM vs Traditional Breeding: How Are GM Crops Produced?
    [Show full text]
  • World Resources Institute the Monsanto Company
    World Resources Institute Sustainable Enterprise Program A program of the World Resources Institute The Monsanto Company: Quest for Sustainability (A) “Biotechnology represents a potentially sustainable For more than a decade, WRI's solution to the issue, not only of feeding people, but of providing Sustainable Enterprise Program (SEP) the economic growth that people are going to need to escape has harnessed the power of business to poverty…… [Biotechnology] poses the possibility of create profitable solutions to leapfrogging the industrial revolution and moving to a post- environment and development industrial society that is not only economically attractive, but challenges. BELL, a project of SEP, is also environmentally sustainable.i ” focused on working with managers and academics to make companies --Robert Shapiro, CEO, Monsanto Company more competitive by approaching social and environmental challenges as unmet market needs that provide Upon his promotion to CEO of chemical giant The business growth opportunities through Monsanto Company in 1995, Robert Shapiro became a vocal entrepreneurship, innovation, and champion of sustainable development and sought to redefine the organizational change. firm’s business strategy along principles of sustainability. Shapiro’s rhetoric was compelling. He captured analysts’ Permission to reprint this case is attention with the specter of mass hunger and environmental available at the BELL case store. degradation precipitated by rapid population growth and the Additional information on the Case
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Analysis of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Gut Microbiome Reveals Phylum-Level Niche-Adaptive Gene Pools
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/214213; this version posted December 22, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Comprehensive analysis of mobile genetic elements in the gut microbiome 2 reveals phylum-level niche-adaptive gene pools 3 Xiaofang Jiang1,2,†, Andrew Brantley Hall2,3,†, Ramnik J. Xavier1,2,3,4, and Eric Alm1,2,5,* 4 1 Center for Microbiome Informatics and Therapeutics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 5 Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 6 2 Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA 7 3 Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard 8 Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA 9 4 Gastrointestinal Unit and Center for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Massachusetts General 10 Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA 11 5 MIT Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 12 02142, USA 13 † Co-first Authors 14 * Corresponding Author bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/214213; this version posted December 22, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 15 Abstract 16 Mobile genetic elements (MGEs) drive extensive horizontal transfer in the gut microbiome. This transfer 17 could benefit human health by conferring new metabolic capabilities to commensal microbes, or it could 18 threaten human health by spreading antibiotic resistance genes to pathogens. Despite their biological 19 importance and medical relevance, MGEs from the gut microbiome have not been systematically 20 characterized.
    [Show full text]