Understanding Religious Violence in Pakistan Syeda Haider University of Connecticut, [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Understanding Religious Violence in Pakistan Syeda Haider University of Connecticut, Syeda.F.Haider@Gmail.Com University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Honors Scholar Theses Honors Scholar Program Spring 5-5-2014 The pS ecter Of Intolerance: Understanding Religious Violence in Pakistan Syeda Haider University of Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Other Political Science Commons, and the Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons Recommended Citation Haider, Syeda, "The peS cter Of Intolerance: Understanding Religious Violence in Pakistan" (2014). Honors Scholar Theses. 377. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses/377 The Specter of Intolerance: Understanding Religious Violence in Pakistan Syeda Haider University of Connecticut Department of Political Science 2014 Honors Thesis Advisor: Elizabeth Hanson May 2, 2014 Haider 2 Abstract : The role of religion in Pakistani political and civil life has had a defining role in the political development of the nation. The country is now a breeding ground for religious extremism, with militant groups conducting brutal attacks against the Shia, Ahmedi, Christian and Hindu communities of Pakistan. There have been few explanations attempting to describe the problem of religious violence domestically, within Pakistan’s borders towards Pakistani citizens. This essay examines how, despite Pakistan’s initial conception as a secular state, the country has become haunted by intense religious violence. It links the lack of consensus around national identity with the state’s political exploitation of an exclusive and conservative version of Islam that laid the foundation for the development of groups hostile to religious minorities, following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to my thesis advisor, Professor Betty Hanson, in her generous guidance and support of this project. From reading half-finished drafts to fleshing out every point in this thesis, she has been an immense help on my road to completion. I am also thankful for Professor Jennifer Sterling-Folker’s help in providing a clear and critical eye over the text of the paper, as well as her willingness to answer every question possible about the process. Introduction Since the events of 9/11, the world has focused in on Pakistan, and its role as a nation caught between its obligations to secularism and democracy while confronting the problems of extremism and praetorian rule. Much of the discourse surrounding jihad 1 in Pakistan has been in relation to jihad’s effects on other nations and other peoples, including Afghanistan, India, and the United States. However, a significant number of Pakistanis are also victims of the violence that has come of the global jihad, and their lives and livelihoods are arguably in greater danger because they are citizens of a state that both actively and tacitly supports militant groups. These Pakistanis belong to religious minorities in the country, and have been subject to persecution and discrimination because of their peripheral religious status. The violence against them has become so rampant that Minority Rights Group International, in its annual State of the 1 Jihad here is defined in accordance with mainstream Western understandings of the word, as a holy war conducted by Muslim militant groups against infidels. Haider 3 World’s Minorities report for 2007 to 2010, placed Pakistan in the top 10 (out of a ranking of 150 states) of its lists of states violating minority rights (MRGI 2010). There have been few comprehensive analyses describing why religious minorities have and continue be the victims of violence. This study links the lack of consensus around national identity with the state’s political exploitation of an exclusive and conservative version of Islam that laid the foundation for the development of groups hostile to religious minorities, following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. This paper argues that the problem of violence against religious minorities begins with Pakistan’s initial lack of consensus around a national identity. Mohammad Ali Jinnah and the Muslim League 2, the founders of Pakistan, needed to create an ideological basis for the formation of Pakistan. Many Indian Muslims were against a separate state for Muslims. Jinnah, in order to mobilize broad support for a separate state, used the rhetoric of secularism and democracy and relied on the symbols of Islam to invoke support for Pakistan. What resulted was a vague understanding of Pakistan as an “Islamic state” – it was not specified whose Islam would represent the state and its people. As a result of this ambiguity, political and military leaders were able to use specific versions of Islam to cement their power. General Zia Ul-Haq used a particularly strict and conservative interpretation of Islam throughout his eleven years as head of state. It was ultimately this version of Islam that pervaded the country’s legal and military institutions and was also the version that left little room for the country’s religious minorities. Through Zia’s codification of this particular Islam in law, it became the legitimate and correct version, providing fodder for conservative religious clerics and pundits to fuel 2 The All-India Muslim League, popularly known as the Muslim League, was the North Indian Muslim political party active from the 1910s to the 1940s that called for the establishment of a Muslim state separate from India. Haider 4 their own agendas. There were few secular forces in the country strong enough to counteract this pervasion of religiosity in public and political life. The influx of hardline militant groups that rooted themselves in Pakistan following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent War on Terror found an environment that encouraged and perpetuated fundamentalist agendas, especially ones that viewed “incorrect” versions of Islam as blasphemous/heresy, and a threat to the existing order. These groups were thus able to launch violence against religious minorities that remains unchecked. Research Design This paper seeks to explain why religious and sectarian attacks have taken hold of Pakistan such that members of religious minorities feel unsafe when leaving their homes. In order to accomplish this, I will establish that religious-based violence has indeed increased in the country. I will do this by outlining a definition of religious violence: targeted attacks against religious minorities because their faith is not that of the majority group’s, which in this case is Sunni Islam. I will utilize sources of data from government documents, human rights groups, and non-governmental organizations. The data obtained from these sources will span the length of Pakistan’s history, from 1947-2013. I believe that multiple explanations must be considered when attempting to explain the problem of religious violence. These explanations include, (1) the initial ambiguous national identity presented by the Muslim League that ultimately resulted in the incorporation of conservative religious elements into state identity, which also normalized a desecular understanding of statehood and citizenship; (2) the role of the state in implementing religious intolerance into law and policy, thus providing militant Haider 5 groups with the political legitimacy to conduct violence on the basis of religion; and (3) the impact of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in spearheading the rise of global Islamic fundamentalism. These explanations are the ones that appear most frequently in the literature on Pakistan’s conservative religious environment, and I believe they are most likely to explain the proliferation of violence that has wracked the country since the 1980s. The first explanation is the affirmation of an exclusive religious identity by the state, and thus the legal avowal of the inferior status of religious minorities. To fully understand this theme, I will examine the historical trajectory of Pakistani political development, with particular attention to the role of religion in law and policy. Thus, this thesis will provide background information on Pakistani history, beginning with the Muslim League’s call for a separate Muslim-majority state, and Pakistani leaders’ use of religious rhetoric to mobilize mass support for a Muslim nation-state. This section will rely mostly on secondary historical analyses of Pakistan from legal scholars and historians. The second explanation examines the presence of conservative interpretations of Islamic law in state law, as a national policy pushed by dictator Zia Ul-Haq; much of this section will be devoted to understanding how the Pakistani government’s incorporation of church (or in this case, mosque) into state has allowed for and supported intolerance against religious minorities. I will focus specifically on the 1980s as a period when state legal codes were reformulated to incorporate aspects of conservative interpretations of religious law. Understanding how the state has entwined its claim to legitimacy with religious conservatism is central to explaining religious violence. The state’s sanctioning Haider 6 of intolerant institutionalizations of religion legitimizes the actions of extremist groups, who are then able to justify their violence as part of their moral and religious obligation. I will also examine the relationship of sectarian groups to the military. Using secondary scholarly analysis, I will attempt to understand the official policies of the military, the country’s most powerful institution,
Recommended publications
  • Arabization and Linguistic Domination: Berber and Arabic in the North of Africa Mohand Tilmatine
    Arabization and linguistic domination: Berber and Arabic in the North of Africa Mohand Tilmatine To cite this version: Mohand Tilmatine. Arabization and linguistic domination: Berber and Arabic in the North of Africa. Language Empires in Comparative Perspective, DE GRUYTER, pp.1-16, 2015, Koloniale und Postkoloniale Linguistik / Colonial and Postcolonial Linguistics, 978-3-11-040836-2. hal-02182976 HAL Id: hal-02182976 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02182976 Submitted on 14 Jul 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Arabization and linguistic domination: Berber and Arabic in the North of Africa Mohand Tilmatine To cite this version: Mohand Tilmatine. Arabization and linguistic domination: Berber and Arabic in the North of Africa. Language Empires in Comparative Perspective, DE GRUYTER, pp.1-16, 2015, Koloniale und Postkoloniale Linguistik / Colonial and Postcolonial Linguistics 978-3-11-040836-2. hal-02182976 HAL Id: hal-02182976 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02182976 Submitted on 14 Jul 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamophobia and Religious Intolerance: Threats to Global Peace and Harmonious Co-Existence
    Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies (QIJIS) Volume 8, Number 2, 2020 DOI : 10.21043/qijis.v8i2.6811 ISLAMOPHOBIA AND RELIGIOUS INTOLERANCE: THREATS TO GLOBAL PEACE AND HARMONIOUS CO-EXISTENCE Kazeem Oluwaseun DAUDA National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), Jabi-Abuja, Nigeria Consultant, FARKAZ Technologies & Education Consulting Int’l, Ijebu-Ode [email protected] Abstract Recent events show that there are heightened fear, hostilities, prejudices and discriminations associated with religion in virtually every part of the world. It becomes almost impossible to watch news daily without scenes of religious intolerance and violence with dire consequences for societal peace. This paper examines the trends, causes and implications of Islamophobia and religious intolerance for global peace and harmonious co-existence. It relies on content analysis of secondary sources of data. It notes that fear and hatred associated with Islām and persecution of Muslims is the fallout of religious intolerance as reflected in most melee and growingverbal attacks, trends anti-Muslim of far-right hatred,or right-wing racism, extremists xenophobia,. It revealsanti-Sharī’ah that Islamophobia policies, high-profile and religious terrorist intolerance attacks, have and loss of lives, wanton destruction of property, violation led to proliferation of attacks on Muslims, incessant of Muslims’ fundamental rights and freedom, rising fear of insecurity, and distrust between Muslims and QIJIS, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2020 257 Kazeem Oluwaseun DAUDA The paper concludes that escalating Islamophobic attacks and religious intolerance globally hadnon-Muslims. constituted a serious threat to world peace and harmonious co-existence. Relevant resolutions in curbing rising trends of Islamophobia and religious intolerance are suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • ISLAMISM and ANTISEMITISM. PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE on THEIR RELATIONSHIP from CROSS-NATIONAL OPINION DATA Arno Tausch
    ISLAMISM AND ANTISEMITISM. PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE ON THEIR RELATIONSHIP FROM CROSS-NATIONAL OPINION DATA Arno Tausch What do we really know about mass support for Islamism? And what is its connection to antisemitism? Our analysis of these questions is based on pro- max factor analytical studies based on openly available cross-national survey data. First, we analyze the determinants of what led representative global World Values Survey (WVS) global Muslim interview partners to reject to have a Jewish neighbor, which is the only available WVS item to measure antisemi- tism. We also identify the extent of relationships between antisemitism, the economic and social situation, religion data, and opinions on terrorism among global Muslim publics based on the global Pew Research Centre surveys. Fi- nally, we re-evaluate Arab Barometer survey data on ‘moderate Islamism’ and its relationship to antisemitism. All our new quantitative evidence supports the hypothesis developed in this essay from the literature that Islamism is deeply connected to antisemitism. Our data also indicate that Muslim dissatisfaction and dissent with society, often mentioned as the drivers of Islamism, are in fact connected to Muslim secularism and a distance from Islamism. Channeling this dissent in secular left- and right-wing protest parties would be an im- portant future task in the stabilization of Arab and Muslim democracies. Keywords: antisemitism, Islamism, promax factor, World Values Survey. Background The comparative analysis of international opinion surveys has become an important field of studies in international social science (Davidov et al. 2011). Without question, the assessment of public opinion among larger publics is a vital element in any fight against terrorism, and not just against Islamist terrorism (Ayalon 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Country Snapshot Serbia
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 39 Issue 5 Article 9 2019 Country Snapshot Serbia Belgrade Open School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Eastern European Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Open School, Belgrade (2019) "Country Snapshot Serbia," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 39 : Iss. 5 , Article 9. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol39/iss5/9 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Country snapshot Serbia By Belgrade Open School The Christian faith has been present in the territory comprising modern Serbia since the Roman period. After the initial spread of Christianity to the area in the 2nd century, religious authority fluctuated between Rome and Constantinople, before Eastern Orthodoxy became established in the late 9th century. Under the medieval Nemanjic dynasty, the Serbian Orthodox Church achieved autocephalous status in 1219, and was elevated to a patriarchate in 1346. Islam was introduced in Serbia with the Ottoman presence in the Balkans from the 14th century onwards. Varying degrees of tolerance between the Orthodox and Muslim populations of foreign and Slavic descent followed. Between 1804 and 1815, a series of Serbian uprisings against Ottoman rule culminated in Serbia gaining autonomy under the rule of Serbian hereditable princes in 1830, and eventually in complete independence in 1878.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Buddhist-Muslim Conflict in Asia and Possibilities for Transformation by Iselin Frydenlund
    Policy Brief December 2015 The rise of Buddhist-Muslim conflict in Asia and possibilities for transformation By Iselin Frydenlund Executive summary Violence against Muslim minorities in Buddhist societies has increased in recent years. The Muslim Rohingyas in Myanmar are disenfranchised, and many of their candidates were rejected by the official Union Election Commission prior to the 2015 elections. Furthermore laws about religious conversion, missionary activities, and interfaith marriage are being pro- moted to control relations between religions and prevent conflict. The danger, however, is that increased control will lead to more, not fewer, conflicts. Discrimination against religious minorities may lead to radicalisation. In addition minority-majority relations in a single state may have regional consequences because a minority in one state can be the majority in another, and there is an increasing trend for co-religionists in different countries to support each other. Thus protection of religious minorities is not only a question of freedom of religion and basic human rights; it also affects security and peacebuilding in the whole region. Anti- Muslim violence and political exclusion of Muslim minorities take place in the wake of in- creased Buddhist nationalism. This policy brief identifies local as well as global drivers for Buddhist-Muslim conflict and the rise of Buddhist nationalism. It then shows how Buddhist- Muslim conflict can be addressed, most importantly through the engagement of local religious leaders. Introduction Buddhist countries are generally at risk of persecution. But Attacks on Muslim minorities in Buddhist countries have weak state protection of Muslim communities leaves these escalated in recent years (OHCHR, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Protestants, Quakers, and the Narrative of Religious Persecution in England
    DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal Volume 2 Article 1 2014 Protestants, Quakers, and the Narrative of Religious Persecution in England Shelby Lohr Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/discovery Part of the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Lohr, Shelby (2014) "Protestants, Quakers, and the Narrative of Religious Persecution in England," DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal: Vol. 2 , Article 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31922/disc2.1 Available at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/discovery/vol2/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Quakers, Protestants, and the Narrative of English Religious Persecution In early modern England, religious intolerance reigned supreme. There was a pervading hostility towards religious groups that were not associated with the Church of England, and these dissenting religious groups were regularly persecuted for their differing views. While each sectarian group was unique, there are parallels that can be traced between the persecutions that occurred throughout this period. Among these 16 th - and 17 th -century dissenting groups are Protestants and Quakers, whose responses to persecution are strikingly similar. This essay seeks to trace the commonalities between these two religious groups, with the aim of gaining a more nuanced understanding of religious intolerance in a period hostile to religious nonconformity. First, it is imperative to understand the distinction between Protestants and Quakers as employed in this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Islamist Politics February 11, 2014 Contents
    POMEPS STUDIES 6 islam in a changing middle east Rethinking Islamist Politics February 11, 2014 Contents The Debacle of Orthodox Islamism . 7 Khalil al-Anani, Middle East Institute Understanding the Ideological Drivers Pushing Youth Toward Violence in Post-Coup Egypt . 9 Mokhtar Awad, Center for American Progress Why do Islamists Provide Social Services? . 13 Steven Brooke, University of Texas at Austin Rethinking Post-Islamism and the Study of Changes in Islamist Ideology . 16 By Michaelle Browers, Wake Forest University The Brotherhood Withdraws Into Itself . 19 Nathan J. Brown, George Washington University Were the Islamists Wrong-Footed by the Arab Spring? . 24 François Burgat, CNRS, Institut de recherches et d’études sur le monde arabe et musulman (translated by Patrick Hutchinson) Jihadism: Seven Assumptions Shaken by the Arab Spring . 28 Thomas Hegghammer, Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) The Islamist Appeal to Quranic Authority . 31 Bruce B. Lawrence, Duke University Is the Post-Islamism Thesis Still Valid? . 33 Peter Mandaville, George Mason University Did We Get the Muslim Brotherhood Wrong? . 37 Marc Lynch, George Washington University Rethinking Political Islam? Think Again . 40 Tarek Masoud, Harvard University Islamist Movements and the Political After the Arab Uprisings . 44 Roel Meijer, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and Ghent University, Belgium Beyond Islamist Groups . 47 Jillian Schwedler, Hunter College, City University of New York The Shifting Legitimization of Democracy and Elections: . 50 Joas Wagemakers, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands Rethinking Islamist Politics . 52 Carrie Rosefsky Wickham, Emory University Progressive Problemshift or Paradigmatic Degeneration? . 56 Stacey Philbrick Yadav, Hobart and William Smith Colleges Online Article Index Please see http://pomeps.org/2014/01/rethinking-islamist-politics-conference/ for online versions of all of the articles in this briefing .
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of Religious Violence
    The Myth of Religious Violence The idea that “religion” is peculiarly prone to violence is not based in fact, but is an ideological justification for the dominance of secular social orders, which can and do inspire violence. The myth of religious violence leads us to turn a blind eye to the causes of non-Western grievances against the Western world. Christian Reflection Prayer A Series in Faith and Ethics Scripture Reading: James 4:1-3 Reflection “People can and do commit violence in the name of God,” William Cavanagh admits. Confessing this is a step toward a more humble faith. But he challenges the stronger claim that there is something Focus Article: called “religion” that is more likely to cause violence than what is Religion, Violence, not religion. Seeing through that “myth” is a step toward a more Nonsense, and Power accurate understanding of violence in our world. (Patterns of Violence, Cavanaugh outlines three reasons to be suspicious of the idea pp. 11-19) that religion is peculiarly prone to violence. 4The distinction between “religious” and “secular” is too unstable. The Suggested Articles: “myth” is supported in this way: religious and secular things (that American Religions and is, beliefs, institutions, causes) can be easily distinguished, and the War religious ones are more violent because they are absolutist, divisive, (Patterns of Violence, and non-rational. When counter-examples to this line of thinking are pp. 81-86) raised—e.g., most wars and exterminations are spawned by nation- What Kind of Religion Is alism, totalitarianism, ethnic rivalry, control of resources and markets, Safe for Society? atheist ideologies, and other “secular” causes—some curious fudging (Patterns of Violence, occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Zakat and Ushr Act, 2011
    THE KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA ZAKAT AND USHR ACT, 2011. (KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA ACT NO. XVII OF 2011) CONTENTS PREAMBLE SECTIONS CHAPTER-I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent, application and commencement. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER-II ZAKAT 3. Charge and collection of Zakat. 4. Secrecy of information. CHAPTER-III PRELIMINARY 5. Charge and collection of Ushr. 6. Mode of assessment and collection of Ushr. CHAPTER-IV ZAKAT FUNDS 7. Establishment of Zakat Funds. 8. Utilization of Zakat Funds. 9. Disbursements from Zakat Funds. 10. Accounts. 11. Audit. CHAPTER-V ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION 12. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Zakat and Ushr Council. 13. Chief Administrator. 14. District Zakat and Ushr Committee. 15. Local Zakat and Ushr Committee. 16. Vacancy etc., not to invalidate acts or proceedings. 17. Members of Zakat and Ushr Council, a District Committee and a Local Committee to be Muslim. 18. Persons to preside at meetings in the absence of Chairman. 19. Power of supersession and removal. 20. Vote of no confidence. 21. Administrative Organization. 22. Certain persons to be public servants. CHAPTER-VI MISCELLANEOUS 23. Exemption. 24. Certain tax concessions. 25. Power to make rules and regulations. 26. Power to call for information and issued directions. 27. Indemnity and bar of jurisdiction. 28. Removal of Difficulties. 29. Repeal, succession and saving. THE KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA ZAKAT AND USHR ACT, 2011. (KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA ACT NO. XVII OF 2011) (first published after having received the assent of the Governor of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in the Gazette of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Extraordinary),dated the 6th October, 2011). AN ACT to provide provisions relating to the assessment, collection and disbursement of Zakat and Ushr.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Zakah and Awqaf in Poverty Alleviation
    Islamic Development Bank Group Islamic Research & Training Institute Role of Zakah and Awqaf in Poverty Alleviation Habib Ahmed Occasional Paper No. 8 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia b © Islamic Development Bank, 2004 Islamic Research and Training Institute, King Fahd National Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ahmed, Habib Role of Zakat and Awqaf in Poverty Alleviation./ Habib Ahmed- Jeddah,2004-08-03 150 P; 17X 24 cm ISBN: 9960-32-150-9 1-Zakat 2-Endownments (Islamic fiqh) 3- Waqf I-Title 252.4 dc 1425/4127 L.D. No. 1425/4127 ISBN: 9960-32-150-9 The views expressed in this book are not necessarily those of the Islamic Research and Training Institute or of the Islamic Development Bank. References and citations are allowed but must be properly acknowledged First Edition 1425H (2004) . c ﺑﺴﻢ ﺍﻪﻠﻟ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ BISMILLAHIRRAHMANIRRAHIM d e CONTENTS List of Tables, Charts, Boxes, and Figures……………………….. 5 Acknowledgements..................................................................................... 9 Foreword……………………………………………………………………. 13 Executive Summary…………………………………………………… 15 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………… 19 1.1. Islamic View of Poverty……………………………………….. 20 1.2. Objectives of the Paper………………………………………… 23 1.3. Outline of the Paper……………………………………………. 23 2. Shari[ah and Historical Aspects of Zakah and Awqaf……... 25 2.1. Zakah and Awqaf in Shari[ah and Fiqh ……………………. 25 2.1.1. Zakah in Shari[ah and Fiqh………………………… 25 2.1.2. Awqaf in Shari[ah and Fiqh ………………………… 28 2.2. Historical Experiences of Zakah and Awqaf………………. 30 2.2.1. Historical Experiences of Zakah…………………….. 30 2.2.2. Historical Experiences of Awqaf…………………….. 32 2.3. Contemporary Resolutions on Zakah and Awqaf………… 35 2.3.1. Contemporary Resolutions on Zakah……………….
    [Show full text]
  • War – Just Or Justifiable? a Christian Orthodox Perspective
    Studia Oecumenica 16 (2016) s. 113–122 Sławomir NowoSad Wydział Teologii KUL War – Just or Justifiable? A Christian Orthodox Perspective Abstract Being sent to the world Christianity had to determine its moral assessment of different worldly realities, war and peace among them. While the Western tradition rather early de- veloped a just war doctrine, the East took a different path. War has constantly been per- ceived as evil though in some circumstances necessary and hence justifiable (but strictly speaking neither “just” nor “good”). Both the Greek Fathers and later Eastern authors and Church figures, like Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, would develop their understand- ing of warfare as “irrational” and an obstacle on every Christian’s path to theosis. The Russian Orthodox Bishops’ The Basis of the Social Concept is a rare example of a more elaborated theory of the justification of warfare. Keywords: just war, Christian Orthodoxy. Wojna sprawiedliwa z perspektywy prawosławnej Streszczenie Inaczej niż na Zachodzie, chrześcijański Wschód o wiele ostrożniej formułował teorię wojny sprawiedliwej (ius ad bellum). Widział wojnę zawsze jako zło, jakkolwiek w pew- nych okolicznościach uznawał jej konieczność. W centrum prawosławnej teologii i liturgii jest zawsze pokój jako wyjątkowy i zobowiązujący dar Boży. Angażowanie się w wojnę, nawet jeśli konieczne, staje się przeszkodą na drodze od theosis, która ma być celem dla każdego chrześcijanina. Uznając irracjonalność wojny i niemożliwość jej pogodze- nia z wolą Bożą, teologia prawosławna odnotowała jednak próby określenia warunków jej podjęcia, jak i sposobów ograniczenia jej złych skutków (ius in bello). Wielokrotnie przeciwko niegodziwości wojny wypowiadał się Patriarcha Konstantynopola Bartłomiej, a względnie pełne opracowanie etycznych aspektów wojny dali prawosławni biskupi ro- syjscy w 2000 r.
    [Show full text]
  • A/69/261 General Assembly
    United Nations A/69/261 General Assembly Distr.: General 5 August 2014 Original: English Sixty-ninth session Item 69 (b) of the provisional agenda* Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms Elimination of all forms of religious intolerance Note by the Secretary-General The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General Assembly the interim report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Heiner Bielefeldt, submitted in accordance with General Assembly resolution 68/170. * A/69/150. 14-58756 (E) 250814 *1458756* A/69/261 Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief Summary In the present report, the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Heiner Bielefeldt, provides an overview of his mandate activities since the submission of the previous report to the General Assembly (A/68/290), including his reports to the Human Rights Council and on country visits, as well as communications and highlights of presentations and consultations. The Special Rapporteur then focuses on means to eliminate religious intolerance and discrimination in the workplace, a theme which he thinks warrants more systematic attention. The sources of religious intolerance and discrimination in the workplace can be manifold and include prejudices existing among employers, employees or customers, restrictive interpretations of corporate identity or a general fear of religious diversity. After clarifying that the human right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief also relates to manifestations of religious diversity in the workplace, the Special Rapporteur particularly deals with measures of “reasonable accommodation” that may be needed to overcome discrimination.
    [Show full text]