Blekinge Institute of Technology School of Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Blekinge Institute of Technology School of Management Blekinge Institute of Technology School of Management Master Thesis of MSc. Business Administration “The IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION” “Managing the Process of Privatization and its impacts on Performance and Development: A case Study of Pakistan Telecommunication Limited” Supervisor Dr. Stefan Hellmer Authors Muhammad Anwar Jamal Shah Haroon Ur Rashid Hussain Ullah Sheraz Ahmed June 2009 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The profound thanks goes to ALLAH Almighty, most gracious, most Merciful, whom alone we worship and ask for help. We are indebted to many here at BTH who contributed (directly or indirectly) in preparation of our Master Dissertation. First of all we are highly acknowledged to Mr. Anders Nillson whose lectures regarding Research Studies have added new dimension to our knowledge. We would like our deep gratitude to our supervisor Dr. Stefan Hellmer whose co-operation and dictations about the deficiencies in our dissertation have made us capable of timely completion of our working. Our appreciation also goes to Mr. Benno Engstrom (Projektledare BTH) whose fruitful discussion and provided materials has contributed a lot to our dissertation. Lastly we would like to pay our homage to our friends here at BTH whose support and co- operation makes us capable of presenting our Dissertation. Muhammad Anwar Jamal Shah Haroon Ur Rashid Hussain Ullah Sheraz Ahmed ii ABSTRACT Title: “THE IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION” “Managing the Process of Privatization and its impacts on Performance and Development: A case Study of Pakistan Telecommunication Limited” Authors: Muhammad Anwar Jamal Shah, Haroon Ur Rashid Hussain Ullah, Sheraz Ahmed Supervisor: Dr. Stefan Hellmer Objective: The purpose of the thesis is to evaluate the impacts of privatization on Growth, profitability and employment of Pakistan Telecommunication Limited, So that the organization may be able to get the fruitful impacts of this globally recognized phenomenon. In such a situation where privatization is still a matter of suspicion, it will make some positive contribution. Methods: In our dissertation we have followed the Qualitative method, while our main sources of information are reports, and other published materials i.e. our main dependency during this study remains on Secondary data. Results: We have compared the privatization of PTCL with the Privatization of Telia. Comparison with the Telia has extracted very useful steps for PTCL. The main result during comparison was adoption of different strategies which Telia has adopted after privatization. Conclusions: The main conclusions of our study for Pakistan Telecommunication is to enhance its poor quality service, adopt the latest Technology, and focus on Publicity and media campaign in order to coup with the diverse environment of Telecom Sector. Key Word: Impact of Privatization, PTCL, Telia, Telecommunication, Privatization of PTCL, Telecom Privatization, Comparison between Telia and PTCL. iii Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Research Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2. Problem Discussion .............................................................................. 2 1.3. Research Question ............................................................................... 4 1.4. Research Methodology ........................................................................ 4 1.4.1. Literature.................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.2. Archival Records ........................................................................................................ 5 1.4.3. Internet Sources .......................................................................................................... 5 1.4.4. Interviews................................................................................................................... 5 1.4.5. SWOT and Porter’s Analysis ...................................................................................... 5 1.5. Research Aim & Objectives ................................................................ 5 2. PRIVATIZATION & TELECOM RE-REGULATION .............................................................. 7 2.1. Privatization ......................................................................................... 7 2.2. Privatization Trends ............................................................................ 7 2.3. Why Privatization ................................................................................ 9 2.4. Determinants of Privatization ........................................................... 10 2.4.1. Political Preferences ................................................................................................. 10 2.4.2. Hard Budget Constraints ........................................................................................... 10 2.4.3. Legal Origins............................................................................................................ 10 2.4.4. Stock Market Liquidity ............................................................................................. 11 2.4.5. Competition and Efficiency ...................................................................................... 11 2.5. Privatization Techniques ................................................................... 11 2.5.1. Asset Sales ............................................................................................................... 11 2.5.2. Share-issue privatizations ......................................................................................... 12 2.5.3. Voucher privatizations .............................................................................................. 12 2.6. Telecom Re-regulation ...................................................................... 12 2.6.1. Latin America .......................................................................................................... 12 2.6.2. Asia .......................................................................................................................... 13 2.6.3. Africa ....................................................................................................................... 13 2.7. Special Issues of Telecom Reforms in Developing Countries .......... 14 2.7.1. Incomplete Infrastructure .......................................................................................... 14 iv 2.7.2. Scarce Human Resources .......................................................................................... 14 2.7.3. Paucity of Information .............................................................................................. 15 2.7.4. Undeveloped Local Capital Markets ......................................................................... 15 2.7.5. Weak Legal, Regulatory, and Institutional Framework .............................................. 16 2.7.6. Limited Interest of Foreign Investors and Banks ....................................................... 16 2.8. The Impact of Privatization .............................................................. 16 3. RESEARCH METHOLODGY ................................................................................................ 18 3.1. Scientific Methods.............................................................................. 18 3.1.1. Qualitative Method ................................................................................................... 18 3.1.2. Quantitative Method ................................................................................................. 18 3.2. Methods of Research ......................................................................... 19 3.3. Different Inspection Methods............................................................ 19 3.4. Data Collection................................................................................... 20 3.4.1. Primary Data ............................................................................................................ 20 3.4.2. Secondary Data ........................................................................................................ 21 3.4.3. Internal Data ............................................................................................................. 21 3.4.4. External Data............................................................................................................ 22 3.5. Discussion ........................................................................................... 22 3.6. Literature Review .............................................................................. 22 3.6.1. Introduction of Theoretical Sources .......................................................................... 22 3.6.2. SWOT Analysis ....................................................................................................... 23 3.6.3. Porter’s Five Forces .................................................................................................. 24 3.7. Limitations ......................................................................................... 25 4. PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION (PTCL)..................................................................... 27 4.1. History of PTCL ................................................................................ 27 4.2. Reforms & Expansion of Pakistan
Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Study on Total Factors Productivity Performance of Cellular Firms in Pakistan
    A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON TOTAL FACTORS PRODUCTIVITY PERFORMANCE OF CELLULAR FIRMS IN PAKISTAN Shumaila Hashim1 and Khair-Uz-Zaman2 1Department of Business Administration and 2Department of Economics, Gomal University, D.I.Khan, KPK, Pakistan ABSTRACT This study empirically measures the total factors productivity (TFP) of three cellular firms i.e. Paktel, Pakcom and Mobilink operating in Pakistan. For the purpose of analysis, time series data (2000q1-2006q2) has been taken. For all three firms TFP is taken as dependent variable while output, teledensity, geographical areas covered and competition were taken as independent variables. By using the multiple regression models in log-linear form we obtained the positive and significant impact of all variables in all cases except competition that showed its impact negative in case of Paktel and Pakcom and geographical area that was insignificant in case of Mobilink. _________________________________________________________________ entrance of multinational cellular firms INTRODUCTION since 1990 till 2007 served as stepping Advancement in infrastructure especially stones in the growth of Pakistan in telecommunication sector is very telecommunication sector. important for any economy. At the time of independence Pakistan telecommu- Main purpose of this study is to measure nication sector was not well developed. the total factors productivity (TFP) of Telecommunication sector reforms were three pioneer multinational cellular firms started in 1962 and with the passage of working in Pakistan i.e Paktel, Pakcom time key telecom institutional bodies (Instaphone) and Mobilink. Since their like Pakistan Telecommunication inception of operation in Pakistan they Authority (PTA), National Telecommu- have seen many ups and downs. This nication Corporation (NTC) and study tries to examine the impact of Frequency Allocation Board (FAB) were those variables that are responsible for established.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited Company Telecommunication Pakistan PTCL PAKISTAN ANNUAL REPORT 2018 REPORT ANNUAL /ptcl.official /ptclofficial ANNUAL REPORT Pakistan Telecommunication /theptclcompany Company Limited www.ptcl.com.pk PTCL Headquarters, G-8/4, Islamabad, Pakistan Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Contents 01COMPANY REVIEW 03FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONSOLIDATED Corporate Vision, Mission & Core Values 04 Auditors’ Report to the Members 129-135 Board of Directors 06-07 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 136-137 Corporate Information 08 Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss 138 The Management 10-11 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 139 Operating & Financial Highlights 12-16 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 140 Chairman’s Review 18-19 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 141 Group CEO’s Message 20-23 Notes to and Forming Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements 142-213 Directors’ Report 26-45 47-46 ہ 2018 Composition of Board’s Sub-Committees 48 Attendance of PTCL Board Members 49 Statement of Compliance with CCG 50-52 Auditors’ Review Report to the Members 53-54 NIC Peshawar 55-58 02STATEMENTS FINANCIAL Auditors’ Report to the Members 61-67 Statement of Financial Position 68-69 04ANNEXES Statement of Profit or Loss 70 Pattern of Shareholding 217-222 Statement of Comprehensive Income 71 Notice of 24th Annual General Meeting 223-226 Statement of Cash Flows 72 Form of Proxy 227 Statement of Changes in Equity 73 229 Notes to and Forming Part of the Financial Statements 74-125 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Vision Mission To be the leading and most To be the partner of choice for our admired Telecom and ICT provider customers, to develop our people in and for Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • 3G Mobile Spectrum – Issues & Prospects
    SBP Research Bulletin Volume 8, Number 1, 2012 3G Mobile Spectrum – Issues & Prospects Sabina Khurram Jafri* Pakistan’s mobile sector has seen enormous growth after the telecom deregulation in 2004 – cellular revenues reached Rs 262.8 billion in FY11 compared to the level of mere Rs 19.8 billion in FY03, whereas cell phone density rose to 65 percent in FY11 compared to 1.6 percent in 2003. However, the intense competition among the five cell companies – Mobilink, Telenor, Ufone, Warid and Zong has not only resulted in a steep fall in cell tariffs, but has also led to a sharp and consistent fall in overall cellular revenue growth. Importantly, the Average Revenue per User (ARPU) in Pakistan is one of the lowest in the region. Lower cell tariffs though augur well for consumer welfare; the consistent decline in revenue growth is a sign of stagnation in the cell phone market and reflects badly for overall contribution of this sector in economic growth.1 The reversal of this trend needs introduction of value added services, as promised by 3G mobile technology. This technology has the potential of not only boosting cellular companies’ business but also contributing to national exchequer in the form of license fees and increased corporate income and sale taxes. In this context, this note investigates the case for introducing 3G technology in Pakistan and suggests some measures that can improve the outcome of the auction of 3G licenses. What is 3rd Generation Mobile Technology? 3G mobile telecommunication is a generation of standards for mobile phones fulfilling the International Mobile Telecommunications specifications by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU).2 The development of mobile technologies can be divided into several generations, each with improved air and network interface standards, enabling better performance.
    [Show full text]
  • SWOT Analysis of Ufone
    Ufone Ufone GSM is a Pakistani GSM cellular service provider, It's one of five GSM Mobile companies in Pakistan, and is a subsidiary ofPakistan Telecommunication Company. After the privatization of PTCL, Ufone is now owned by Etisalat. Ufone has a subscriber base of 20.23 million as of September 2010. Ufone Cellular Company INTRODUCTION TO UFONE Ufone is a newly cellular company as compared to others like Mobilink, Zong(Paktel), Instaphone operating inPakistan, providing cellular services for Eight years now. Ufone services are offered by Pak Telecom Mobile Limited (PTML), a 100% owned subsidiary of Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL). Established to operate cellular telephony. The company commenced its operations, under the brand name of Ufone, from Islamabad on January 29, 2001. and subsequently extended its coverage to other cities i.e. Lahore, Karachi, Kohat, Jehlum,Gujranwala, Faisalabad, Sheikhopura. In addition to the road coverage on Peshawar-Islamabad-Lahore section. Till now its coverage has been extended to more than 750 cities. In Peshawar its operation were started on 7th of May, 2001. Ufone, the brand name of the service, has been a highly successful venture touching 120000 subscribers in less than four months of its operations. SWOT analysis of Ufone INTRODUCTION Ufone GSM is a Pakistani GSM cellular service provider. It is one of six GSM Mobile companies in Pakistan and is a subsidiary of Pakistan Telecommunication Company. The company commenced its operations under the brand name of Ufone from Islamabad on January 29 2001. U fone expanded its coverage and has added new cities and highways to its coverage network.
    [Show full text]
  • Posted Issuer
    Central Depository Company of Pakistan Limited Element Report Page# : 1 of 267 User : XKYFSI2 Report Selection : Posted Date : 04/11/2020 Element Type : Issuer Time : 06:02:58 Element ID : ALL Location : ALL Status : Active From Date : 01/01/1996 To Date : 04/11/2020 Element Id Element Code Element Name Phone / Fax Contact Name CDC Loc Role Code Maximum User Status Main A/c Address eMail Address Designation Client A/c CM Option No. Date -------- -------- ------------------------ ---------------------- --------------- --------- -------- ----------- -------- 00002 EFU GENERAL 2313471-90 ALTAF QAMRUDDIN KHI Active INSURANCE LIMITED GOKAL 3RD FLOOR, 2314288 CFO AND 08/06/1998 QAMAR HOUSE, CORPORATE M. A. JINNAH ROAD, SECRETARY KARACHI. 00003 HABIB INSURANCE 111-030303 SHABBIR A. KHI Active COMPANY LIMITED GULAMALI 1ST FLOOR, STATE 32421600 CHIEF 01/09/1997 LIFE BLDG. NO. 6, EXECUTIVE HABIB SQUARE, M. A. JINNAH ROAD, [email protected] KARACHI. et 00004 HAYDARI 2411247 ALI ASGHAR KHI Active CONSTRUCTION RAJANI COMPANY LIMITED MEZZANINE FLOOR, 2637965 CHIEF 10/03/2004 UBL BUILDING, EXECUTIVE OPP. POLICE HEAD OFFICER OFFICE, I.I CHUNDRIGAR ROAD, KARACHI. 00005 K-ELECTRIC LIMITED 38709132 EXT:9403 AMJAD MUSTAFA KHI Active Central Depository Company of Pakistan Limited Element Report Page# : 2 of 267 User : XKYFSI2 Report Selection : Posted Date : 04/11/2020 Element Type : Issuer Time : 06:02:58 Element ID : ALL Location : ALL Status : Active From Date : 01/01/1996 To Date : 04/11/2020 Element Id Element Code Element Name Phone / Fax Contact Name CDC Loc Role Code Maximum User Status Main A/c Address eMail Address Designation Client A/c CM Option No. Date -------- -------- ------------------------ ---------------------- --------------- --------- -------- ----------- -------- 1ST FLOOR, 32647159 MANAGER, 01/09/1997 BLOCK-A, CORPORATE AFFAIRS POWER HOUSE, [email protected] ELANDER ROAD, KARACHI 00006 MURREE BREWERY 5567041-7 CH.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Accounts
    Worldcall Telecom Limited We at Worldcall are committed to achieving dynamic growth and service excellence by being at the cutting edge of technological innovation. We strive to consistently meet and surpass customers', employees' and stake-holders' expectations by offering state-of-the-art telecom solutions with national & international footprints. We feel pride in making efforts to position Worldcall and Pakistan in the forefront of international arena. In the telecom market of Pakistan, Worldcall to have an over- whelming impact on the basis of following benchmarks: l Create new standards of product offering in basic and value added telephony by being more cost effective, easily accessible and dependable. Thus ensuring real value for money to all segments of market. l Be a leader within indigenous operators in terms of market share, gross revenues and ARPU within five years and maintain the same positioning thereafter. l Achieve utmost customer satisfaction by setting up high standards of technical quality and service delivery. Ensuring the most profitable and sustainable patterns of ROI (Return on Investment) for the stake-holders. Annual Report 2008 01 Worldcall Telecom Limited C O N T E N T S Company Information 05 Notice of Annual General Meeting 07 Message from the Chairman 08 Directors’ Report 11 Key Financial Information 17 Statement of Compliance with the best practices on Transfer Pricing 18 Statement of Compliance with Code of Corporate Governance 19 Auditors’ Review Report on Statement of Compliance with Code of Corporate Governance 21 Auditors’ Report to the Members 22 Balance Sheet 23 Profit and Loss Account 24 Cash Flow Statement 25 Statement of Changes in Equity 26 Notes to the Financial Statements 27 Consolidated Financial Statements 64 Pattern of Shareholding 110 Form of Proxy 115 Annual Report 2008 02 Worldcall Telecom Limited FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008 Annual Report 2008 03 Worldcall Telecom Limited Annual Report 2008 04 Worldcall Telecom Limited COMPANY INFORMATION Chairman Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited
    VIS Credit Rating Company Limited www.vis.com.pk RATING REPORT Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited REPORT DATE: RATING DETAILS October 05, 2020 Latest Rating Previous Rating Long- Short- Long- Short- Rating Category term term term term RATING ANALYSTS: Entity AAA A-1+ AAA A-1+ Talha Iqbal Rating Date October 05, 2020 October 11, 2019 [email protected] Rating Outlook Stable Stable Rating Action Reaffirm Reaffirm Asfia Aziz [email protected] COMPANY INFORMATION Incorporated in 1995 External auditors: KPMG Taseer & Hadi Co., Chartered Accountants. Public Listed Company Chief Executive Officer: Rashid Naseer Khan Board of Directors: - Mr. Shoaib Ahmad Siddiqui - Mr. Abdulrahim A. Al Nooryani - Mr. Rizwan Malik - Mr. Hatem Dowidar - Mr. Hesham Al Qassim - Mr. Khalifa Al Shamsi - Mr. Naveed Kamran Baloch - Syed Shabahat Ali Shah - Dr. Mohamed Karim Bennis APPLICABLE METHODOLOGY(IES) VIS Entity Rating Criteria: Corporates (May 2019) https://www.vis.com.pk/kc-meth.aspx VIS Credit Rating Company Limited www.vis.com.pk Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited OVERVIEW OF THE INSTITUTION RATING RATIONALE Pakistan Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) is the leading Integrated Information Telecommunication Communication Technology (ICT) Company in Pakistan, having the largest fixed-line network Company Limited in the country. The company’s products and services include voice services, high-speed (PTCL) was broadband internet, Fiber to the Home (FTTH) services, CharJi wireless internet, Smart TV incorporated in 1995 (IPTV) service, , Smart TV App and Touch App, digital-content streaming services like Netflix, and provides , and enterprise-grade platforms like Smart Cloud, Tier-3 Certified Data Centers, Managed and telecommunication Satellite Services.
    [Show full text]
  • (July 2011 to June 2012) – Part 2 of 2 Pakistan: Karachi Electric Supply Co
    Annual Environment & Social Monitoring Report (July 2011 to June 2012) – Part 2 of 2 Environmental and Social Performance Report November 2012 Pakistan: Karachi Electric Supply Company Post Privatization Rehabilitation, Upgrade and Expansion Prepared by Karachi Electric Supply Company Karachi, Pakistan The Environmental and Social Performance Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK QUERIES KESC 2013 KESC RESPONSE AGAINST ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT 2011-12 AUGUST - 2013 KESC authorized representative to be contacted on the AMR: Name : Chander Perkash Title : General Manager (Corporate Compliance) Tel : +9221-32647048 Cell : +92300- 2910106 Email : [email protected] ADDRESS: 12th Floor, Technology Park Shahra-e-Faisal, Karachi - Pakistan. Phone: +9221-32647048 Page Section Description/Title Comments / Remarks KESC response No. No. of Section 20 3.2.2 On public Please provide (i) schedule As a part of SEIA, area stakeholder consultation of consultations with are consulted and a general public various stakeholders, (ii) hearing which is open for all is summary of issues raised by organized before each project to respective stakeholder ensure maximum input from public. groups, and (iii) how these issues were resolved. Does the "open door" policy Whistle Blower Policy is in place for for community consultation both internal and External refer to KESC's grievance stakeholders. mechanism? Who or what unit can an aggrieved party AZM Speakup – Whistle Blower approach? Where is this Policy: person or unit located? Please discuss what Communication Platforms through a issues/complaints were dedicated helpline number, email raised, and how these issues address and text messaging option is were resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices in License Renewal
    Best Practices in License Renewal Muhammad Aslam Hayat Vice President, Telenor Pakistan IMPORTANCE OF RENEWAL An early, fair, transparent High fees might and impact financial participatory stability of renewal operators and process and reduce resultant possibility of renewal on Uncertainty further A balanced and reasonable about license investment. It pro-investment terms would: renewal is a would also decision on - promote main constitute a renewal will Predictability investors’ consideration barrier to fair have a positive Mobile and confidence for mobile competition if impact on communication transparency in - act as an companies in different international is a long term business incentive for their licensees have and domestic business environment is long term investment different investors must for investment decisions renewal dates business Previous discussion at SATRC SATRC-11/INP-18, 24 – 26 November 2009, Colombo, Sri Lanka Limited Knowledgebase Renewal Methods Administrative process: Re-auction of spectrum: Parties sit and negotiate terms and condition License/spectrum is auctioned allowing of renewal. In most cases government takes external bidders to also bid and highest bid front seat instead of Regulator. becomes benchmark for renewal. Existing Pros: operators are given first right of refusal. It reduces the risk of involvement of any third Pros: party and negotiations take place with existing This process is comparatively transparent and licensees only. Existing operators have a chance would determine true value of spectrum/license. to actively participate in process and convince Cons: government/regulator for reasonable terms External bidders can influence decision of Cons: Government and chances of a crazy bid by an This process is inherently non-transparent, ambitious bidder cannot be ruled out.
    [Show full text]
  • Vimpelcom Ltd
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F Registration Statement Pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 OR ⌧ Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 OR Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 OR Shell Company Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Commission File Number: 1-34694 VIMPELCOM LTD. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Bermuda (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) Claude Debussylaan 88, 1082 MD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Address of principal executive offices) Jeffrey D. McGhie Group General Counsel & Chief Corporate Affairs Officer Claude Debussylaan 88, 1082 MD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Tel: +31 20 797 7200 Fax: +31 20 797 7201 (Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, each representing one common share New York Stock Exchange Common shares, US$ 0.001 nominal value New York Stock Exchange* * Listed, not for trading or quotation purposes, but only in connection with the registration of ADSs pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 1,628,199,135 common shares, US$ 0.001 nominal value.
    [Show full text]
  • Pay-TV Programmers & Channel Distributors
    #GreatJobs C NTENT page 5 www.contentasia.tv l www.contentasiasummit.com Asia-Pacific sports Game over: StarHub replaces Discovery rights up 22% to 7 new channels standby for July rollout in Singapore US$5b in 2018 Digital rights driving inflation, value peaks everywhere except India Demand for digital rights will push the value of sports rights in the Asia-Pacific region (excluding China) up 22% this year to a record US$5 billion, Media Partners Asia (MPA) says in its new re- port, Asia Pacific Sports In The Age of GoneGone Streaming. “While sports remains the last bastion for pay-TV operators com- bating subscriber churn, OTT delivery is becoming the main driver of rights infla- tion, opening up fresh opportunities for rights-holders while adding new layers of complexity to negotiations and deals,” the report says. The full story is on page 7 Screen grab of Discovery’s dedicated campaign site, keepdiscovery.sg CJ E&M ramps up While Singapore crowds spent the week- StarHub is extending bill rebates to edu- Turkish film biz end staring at a giant #keepdiscovery cation and lifestyle customers and is also Korean remakes follow video display on Orchard Road, StarHub offering a free preview of 30 channel to 25 local titles was putting the finishing touches to its 15 July. brand new seven-channel pack includ- StarHub’s decision not to cave to Dis- ing, perhaps ironically, the three-year-old covery’s rumoured US$11-million demands Korea’s CJ E&M is ramping up its Turkish CuriosityStream HD channel launched by raised questions over what rival platform operations, adding 25 local titles to its Discovery founder John Hendricks.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Audit Process
    Asad Hussain MBA HRM Roll No. 508195455 ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY ISLAMABAD ASSIGNMENT NO.2 ON PROJECT MANGEMENT (569) Topic:- The role of audit in management of a project. Select a project undertaken by a business organization and analyze the role of audit team being played in that specific project, e.g. pre audit, post audit, and its impact on the project SUBMITTED BY_ ASAD HUSSAIN SUBMITTED TO – SIR ATAULLAH SHAH SB. 1 Asad Hussain MBA HRM Roll No. 508195455 ROLL NUMBER – 508195455. MOB. NUMBER – 03335174447. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All praises to Almighty Allah, the most Gracious, the most Beneficent and the most Merciful, who enabled me to complete this assignment. There is always a sense of gratitude one expresses to others for the helpful and needy service they render during all phases of life. I have completed this assignment with the help of different personalities. I wish to express my gratitude towards all of them. It gives me immense pleasure to express my deep regards and sincere sense of gratitude to Mr. Salman Baig, Deputy Director Rural Cell, PTA H/Qs, Islamabad for his support which helped me throughout my assignment. I would also like to thank my teacher MR. ATAULLAH SHAH SB for steering my confidence and capability for giving me insight into assignment by giving me exposure to the arena of competitive and real world. Lastly I would like to thank my parents and friends for their constant support during the duration of my training. Thank You One and All ASAD HUSSAIN. 2 Asad Hussain MBA HRM Roll No.
    [Show full text]