Other Generations Interpretation and Use of the Past: the Case of the Picture Stones on Gotland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Other Generations Interpretation and Use of the Past: the Case of the Picture Stones on Gotland 2l Other Generations Interpretation and Use of the Past: the Case of the Picture Stones on Gotland Mats Burström Throughout history, ancient monuments and artefacts have been ascri- bed many meanings in a multitude of contexts. What consequences does this have for archaeological interpretation and for archaeology as a discipline? The discussion focuses on one single category of ancient monuments: the Gotlandic picture stones, originally raised during the period A.D. 400-1100. Mats Burströtn, Department of Archaeology, Stockholtn Universih:, S-106 91 Stockholm, Swede». The meaning of ancient monuments and der of a hated tyrant, and for yet another it artefacts is not restricted to the time when was foremost a landmark by which to orien- they came into being. On the contrary, they tate oneself in the landscape. The meaning have repeatedly attracted attention and been of a monument exceeded the originators' in- ascribed meaning throughout history. This tention already from the beginning. This pro- applies in particular to those monuments cess has continued ever since in what Richard that are well visible in the landscape. For Bradley has called "the afterlife of monu- centuries, and in many cases for thousands ments" (Bradley 1993). of years, these have been interpreted and If we want a more profound understan- made meaningful elements in the landscape. ding of the meanings of ancient monuments The generations that have followed after we cannot restrict our study to the supposed the monuments came into being have intention behind their making. Instead, we interpreted and used the monuments in their have to adopt a long-term perspective and own way. As time passed the monuments consider the multiplicity of meanings that the were ascribed a multitude of meanings. An monuments have been ascribed (Burström obvious example of how a monument is 1993).It is first when we consider also other ascribed meaning throughout history is, of generations interpretation and use of the course, Stonehenge. As Christopher Chippin- monuments that we fully realize the extent dale has shown, this monument has been of their meaning. interpreted and used in every imaginable way and then some during its history (Chippin- PICTURE STONES AND RESEARCH dale 1983). TRADITIONS Not even at the time when the monu- In the following, interest will focus on ments were built, however, did they have one, meanings that have been ascribed to a single singular meaning. Different persons had dif- category of ancient monuments: the Gotlan- ferent opinions about their meaning. The dic picture stones. As a background to the monument that for someone was a memorial discussion it may be helpful to give a short over a beloved one, was for another a remin- presentation of these stones and research Current Swedish Archaeology, Vol. 4, l996 22 Mats Burström Fig. l. The jour, chronologically separated, main groups of Gotlandic picture stones. After Andrén 1993:35. traditions. 1942), fig. l. Today we know of about 440 Gotlandic The first group of stones is dated to c.400- picture stones. Of these, only four have been 600. It consists of tall stone slabs which were discovered outside Gotland. Two stones have rai sed as gravestones. The pictures are mainly been found in Öland, one in Uppland, and abstract, such as circles and spirals. On the one in Latvia (cf. Key Map, p. 223). The lower part of the stone there is often a ship. picture stones were made during a period of The second group of stones is dated to c. approximately seven hundred years, from c. 600-800. It consists of small stones ("dwarf A.D. 400 till 1100. stones") which were probably raised as The Gotlandic picture stones can be divi- gravestones. The pictures are mainly stylized ded into four, chronologically separated, ships, birds and animals with antlers. main groups (cf. Andrén 1993:35-36;Nylén The third group of stones is dated to c. & Lamm 1988:171-172; Lindqvist 1941- 800-1000. Two different types of stones Current Swedish Archaeology, Vol. 4, 199tt Other Generations'Interpretation and Use of the Past 23 Fig. 2. A Gotlandic pictute stone of the oldest type wasfoundin the stone kerb of a late Viking Age grave at the lht e-cemetery. After Stenbet ger l 962:8. occur: most are large slabs with a keyhole rect connection with graves. This group of shape, but there are also a few smaller stones stones contains very few pictures. Instead which probably formed the walls of small they are covered with ornamental bands coffins. Both types of stones were raised as containing long runic inscriptions, often with memorials, without any direct connection Christian prayers. with graves. The stones are covered with a The academic research traditions con- large number of realistic figures. Most com- cerning picture stones are in themselves, of mon are sailing-ships, armed horsemen, and course, examples of other generations inter- women with drinking horns. Many of the pretation and use of the past. Ever since the figures form scenes. Some of the stones also first paper on Gotlandic picture stones was contain short runic inscriptions. published in 1845 (Säve 1845), the stones The last group of stones is dated to c. have attracted considerable interest. 1000-1100.The stones occur in the same two Not surprisingly, most attention has been shapes as the stones in the third group. Also given to the pictures on the stones. Many these stones were memorials without any di- stones are, however, blind, that is, the pic- Current Swedi sh Archaeotog&, Vol. 4, 1996 24 Mats Burström Viking ships (Nylén & Lamm 1988:162-169; Lindow 1993;cf. Varenius 1992:52-54). In the mythological tradition of inter- pretation the picture stones have been looked upon as illustrations of mythological stories and epic poems which are known from the Old Norse sagas. The stones have even been compared to cartoon strips (e.g. Nylén & Lamm 1988:16). A lot of work has been invested in trying to relate the pictures to specific characters and stories in the sagas. One figure that is supposed to have been identified with certainty is, for example, Odin's eight-legged steed, Sleipnir (cf. fig. 14, right). The research traditions concerning pic- ture stones closely follow the history of archaeological ideas in general. Therefore, I will not enter more deeply into a discussion of previous research. I think it is sufficient to assert that every generation of archaeo- logists has obviously put the questions of its Fig. 3. In a tenth-century grave at the Ihre- own time to the ancient picture stones, and cemetery a picture stone had been placed upri ght consequently the picture stones have been in the head end. Photo: ATA. incorporated into different archaeological contexts. Some picture stones were ancient already during the Viking Age. Some of them were tures have disappeared due to erosion caused also incorporated into new, Viking Age con- by weather. The research has therefore been texts and ascribed new meanings. focused on a smaller number of stones, the stones with well-preserved pictures. VIKING AGE RE-USE The research has in particular been direc- A considerable number of picture stones ted towards the Viking Age stones with plenty have been discovered when excavating later of figures (group III above). These stones prehistoric graves (cf. Nylén & Lamm 1988: have on the one hand been interpreted as 13; Måhl 1990).This applies in particular to realistic pictures of everyday life, and on the Viking Age graves. A vitally important ques- other as illustrations of mythological stories tion is whether the picture stones were used and epic poems. merely as building material in the graves, or In the realistic tradition of interpretation were placed there because of some special the picture stones have been used as a basis meaning ascribed by the grave builders. for reconstructions of, for example, clothing, Probably both alternatives can be correct. weapons, implements and ships. Within ship In a late Viking Age grave at the Ihre- archaeology the sailing-ship figures on the cemetery in Hellvi parish a picture stone of picture stones have become central. The rea- the oldest type was found in the stone kerb, son for this is that they show sails and rigg- fig. 2. The picture stone is about five hund- ings which are not preserved in the finds of red years older than the grave. The rest of the Current Sivedish Archaeology, Vol. 4, l996 Other Generations'interpretation and Use of the Past 25 stone kerb consists of carved slabs of lime- stone (Stenberger 1962:8-11, 131). In this case it is possible that the ancient picture stone was used by the Viking Age grave builders because of its suitable size and form. In other cases, however, the placing of the picture stones in the graves clearly indicates that they have been ascribed special meaning. This is, for example, the case with some other Viking Age graves from the Ihre-cemetery. In a male grave from the tenth century a picture stone had been placed upright in the head end, fig. 3. The stone has no visible figures (Stenberger 1962:127). In another grave, a male grave from the eleventh cen- tury, picture stones had been placed upright in both the head end and the foot end. Both stones have well-preserved pictures, fig. 4, which were facing towards the interior of the grave. The motif on the picture stone (Lamm 143) from the head end has been suggested to depict the resurrection of Christ (Lindqvist 1945:117-118).The two men on Fig. 4. Picture stones found standing uprightin the sides are presumed to hold the halves of the head end and the foot end of an eleventh- the coffin from which Christ has just been set cenntry grave at the Ihre-cemetery.
Recommended publications
  • Old Norse Mythology — Comparative Perspectives Old Norse Mythology— Comparative Perspectives
    Publications of the Milman Parry Collection of Oral Literature No. 3 OLd NOrse MythOLOgy — COMParative PersPeCtives OLd NOrse MythOLOgy— COMParative PersPeCtives edited by Pernille hermann, stephen a. Mitchell, and Jens Peter schjødt with amber J. rose Published by THE MILMAN PARRY COLLECTION OF ORAL LITERATURE Harvard University Distributed by HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England 2017 Old Norse Mythology—Comparative Perspectives Published by The Milman Parry Collection of Oral Literature, Harvard University Distributed by Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England Copyright © 2017 The Milman Parry Collection of Oral Literature All rights reserved The Ilex Foundation (ilexfoundation.org) and the Center for Hellenic Studies (chs.harvard.edu) provided generous fnancial and production support for the publication of this book. Editorial Team of the Milman Parry Collection Managing Editors: Stephen Mitchell and Gregory Nagy Executive Editors: Casey Dué and David Elmer Production Team of the Center for Hellenic Studies Production Manager for Publications: Jill Curry Robbins Web Producer: Noel Spencer Cover Design: Joni Godlove Production: Kristin Murphy Romano Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Hermann, Pernille, editor. Title: Old Norse mythology--comparative perspectives / edited by Pernille Hermann, Stephen A. Mitchell, Jens Peter Schjødt, with Amber J. Rose. Description: Cambridge, MA : Milman Parry Collection of Oral Literature, 2017. | Series: Publications of the Milman Parry collection of oral literature ; no. 3 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifers: LCCN 2017030125 | ISBN 9780674975699 (alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Mythology, Norse. | Scandinavia--Religion--History. Classifcation: LCC BL860 .O55 2017 | DDC 293/.13--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017030125 Table of Contents Series Foreword ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Herjans Dísir: Valkyrjur, Supernatural Femininities, and Elite Warrior Culture in the Late Pre-Christian Iron Age
    Herjans dísir: Valkyrjur, Supernatural Femininities, and Elite Warrior Culture in the Late Pre-Christian Iron Age Luke John Murphy Lokaverkefni til MA–gráðu í Norrænni trú Félagsvísindasvið Herjans dísir: Valkyrjur, Supernatural Femininities, and Elite Warrior Culture in the Late Pre-Christian Iron Age Luke John Murphy Lokaverkefni til MA–gráðu í Norrænni trú Leiðbeinandi: Terry Gunnell Félags- og mannvísindadeild Félagsvísindasvið Háskóla Íslands 2013 Ritgerð þessi er lokaverkefni til MA–gráðu í Norrænni Trú og er óheimilt að afrita ritgerðina á nokkurn hátt nema með leyfi rétthafa. © Luke John Murphy, 2013 Reykjavík, Ísland 2013 Luke John Murphy MA in Old Nordic Religions: Thesis Kennitala: 090187-2019 Spring 2013 ABSTRACT Herjans dísir: Valkyrjur, Supernatural Feminities, and Elite Warrior Culture in the Late Pre-Christian Iron Age This thesis is a study of the valkyrjur (‘valkyries’) during the late Iron Age, specifically of the various uses to which the myths of these beings were put by the hall-based warrior elite of the society which created and propagated these religious phenomena. It seeks to establish the relationship of the various valkyrja reflexes of the culture under study with other supernatural females (particularly the dísir) through the close and careful examination of primary source material, thereby proposing a new model of base supernatural femininity for the late Iron Age. The study then goes on to examine how the valkyrjur themselves deviate from this ground state, interrogating various aspects and features associated with them in skaldic, Eddic, prose and iconographic source material as seen through the lens of the hall-based warrior elite, before presenting a new understanding of valkyrja phenomena in this social context: that valkyrjur were used as instruments to propagate the pre-existing social structures of the culture that created and maintained them throughout the late Iron Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Doorway to Devotion: Recovering the Christian Nature of the Gosforth Cross
    religions Article Doorway to Devotion: Recovering the Christian Nature of the Gosforth Cross Amanda Doviak Department of History of Art, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK; [email protected] Abstract: The carved figural program of the tenth-century Gosforth Cross (Cumbria) has long been considered to depict Norse mythological episodes, leaving the potential Christian iconographic import of its Crucifixion carving underexplored. The scheme is analyzed here using earlier ex- egetical texts and sculptural precedents to explain the function of the frame surrounding Christ, by demonstrating how icons were viewed and understood in Anglo-Saxon England. The frame, signifying the iconic nature of the Crucifixion image, was intended to elicit the viewer’s compunction, contemplation and, subsequently, prayer, by facilitating a collapse of time and space that assim- ilates the historical event of the Crucifixion, the viewer’s present and the Parousia. Further, the arrangement of the Gosforth Crucifixion invokes theological concerns associated with the veneration of the cross, which were expressed in contemporary liturgical ceremonies and remained relevant within the tenth-century Anglo-Scandinavian context of the monument. In turn, understanding of the concerns underpinning this image enable potential Christian symbolic significances to be suggested for the remainder of the carvings on the cross-shaft, demonstrating that the iconographic program was selected with the intention of communicating, through multivalent frames of reference, the significance of Christ’s Crucifixion as the catalyst for the Second Coming. Keywords: sculpture; art history; archaeology; early medieval; Anglo-Scandinavian; Vikings; iconog- raphy Citation: Doviak, Amanda. 2021. Doorway to Devotion: Recovering the Christian Nature of the Gosforth Cross.
    [Show full text]
  • Viking Art, Snorri Sturluson and Some Recent Metal Detector Finds. Fornvännen 113
    •• JOURNAL OF SWEDISH ANTIQUARIAN RESEARCH 2018:1 Art. Pentz 17-33_Layout 1 2018-02-16 14:37 Sida 17 Viking art, Snorri Sturluson and some recent metal detector finds By Peter Pentz Pentz, P., 2018. Viking art, Snorri Sturluson and some recent metal detector finds. Fornvännen 113. Stockholm. This paper seeks to contribute to a recent debate on the use of private metal detect- ing and its value within archaeology. Specifically it explores – by presenting some recently found Viking Period artefacts from Denmark – how private metal detect- ing can contribute to our understanding of Viking minds. By bringing together the myths as related by Snorri Sturluson in the early 13th century with the artefacts, I argue that thanks to private metal detecting through the last decades, our ability to recognise Viking art as narrative art has improved substantially. Peter Pentz, National Museum of Denmark, Ny Vestergade 10, DK–1471 København K [email protected] Over 60 years ago, Thorkild Ramskou (1953) the main problems in understanding Viking art described Viking art as almost exclusively deco- is the scarcity of reference materials. We largely rative, only functioning as a covering for plain know Norse mythology and its narratives through surfaces. In the rare cases where it was represen- Medieval Christian authors, in particular Snorri. tative, quality was poor. Viking artists, he stated, Hence, the myths have come down to us biased, preferred to portray scenes from myths of the reinterpreted and even now and then propagan- gods and heroic legends. Such scenes functioned dised. Furthermore, what survived is only a selec- as mnemonics; for the viewer they would recall tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Runestone Images and Visual Communication
    RUNESTONE IMAGES AND VISUAL COMMUNICATION IN VIKING AGE SCANDINAVIA MARJOLEIN STERN, MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy JULY 2013 Abstract The aim of this thesis is the visual analysis of the corpus of Viking Age Scandinavian memorial stones that are decorated with figural images. The thesis presents an overview of the different kinds of images and their interpretations. The analysis of the visual relationships between the images, ornamentation, crosses, and runic inscriptions identifies some tendencies in the visual hierarchy between these different design elements. The contents of the inscriptions on runestones with images are also analysed in relation to the type of image and compared to runestone inscriptions in general. The main outcome of this analysis is that there is a correlation between the occurrence of optional elements in the inscription and figural images in the decoration, but that only rarely is a particular type of image connected to specific inscription elements. In this thesis the carved memorial stones are considered as multimodal media in a communicative context. As such, visual communication theories and parallels in commemoration practices (especially burial customs and commemorative praise poetry) are employed in the second part of the thesis to reconstruct the cognitive and social contexts of the images on the monuments and how they create and display identities in the Viking Age visual communication. Acknowledgements Many people have supported and inspired me throughout my PhD. I am very grateful to my supervisors Judith Jesch and Christina Lee, who have been incredibly generous with their time, advice, and bananas.
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Scanning of Gotland Picture Stones with Supplementary Material Digital Catalogue of 3D Data
    Journal of Nordic Archaeological Science 18, pp. 55–65 (2013) 3D scanning of Gotland picture stones with supplementary material Digital catalogue of 3D data Laila Kitzler Åhfeldt Swedish National Heritage Board, The runic research group, Department for Conservation, Box 1114, SE-621 22 Visby, Sweden ([email protected]) The Gotland picture stones (dated to c. 400–1100 AD) are among the most spectacular and informative artefacts from the Iron Age and Viking Age to have been discovered in Sweden. The main aim of this paper is to make digital 3D documentation of the Gotland picture stones publicly available for analysis of their motifs, runic inscriptions and weathering processes. The data were col- lected within the project 3D scanning of the Gotland Picture Stones: Workshops, Iconography and Dating (2006–2008), which includes analyses of these stones by means of a high resolution optical 3D scanner. The aim of the project is to clarify certain basic facts concerning the cutting technique, work organization and surrounding circumstances, iconography and dating. Four main issues are identified: workshops, iconographical interpretations, dating, and finally, documentation and enhanced interpretation of weathered and in places van- dalised picture stones. The following report provides a short summary of the main results. The 3D data are provided in STL files that serve as supplementary material to this paper. They are available on the website of the Swedish National Heritage Board: http://3ddata.raa.se Keywords: picture stone, rune stone, Gotland, Viking Age, Iron Age, 3D scan- ning body of source material in an international context, The Gotland picture stones of the utmost relevance to scholars in Germany, Great as a resource for research Britain and Iceland, for instance.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 24 2019 EARLY MEDIEVAL SCANDINAVIA
    vol. 24 2019 EARLY MEDIEVAL SCANDINAVIA: NEW TRENDS IN RESEARCH PRUSSICA EARLY MEDIEVAL SCANDINAVIA: NEW TRENDS IN RESEARCH PRUSSICA Fundacja Centrum Badań Historycznych Warszawa 2019 QUAESTIONES MEDII AEVI NOVAE (2019) SIGMUND OEHRL STOCKHOLM PAGAN STONES IN CHRISTIAN CHURCHES MEDIEVAL VIEWS ON THE PAST (THE EXAMPLE OF GOTLAND, SWEDEN) INTRODUCTION It is a well-known phenomenon that pagan stone monuments were re-used in the construction of Christian churches. Roman spolia are quite frequent in late antique and medieval sacral buildings: Medieval builders pragmatically used – and thus “recycled”1 – tombstones, votive stones, altars, and other monuments of antiquity, and this raises the question to what degree religious or ideological/political intentions played a role in this practice of re-usage. When an antique idol, for instance, remained well visible, was mounted upside down, used as a step of a staircase, or even intentionally damaged or mutilated, it might be suspected that this was prompted by a certain symbolism – such as the overcoming and degradation of heathen idols, which in medieval times were regarded as the devil. In the case of representative picture and epigraphic stones, which do not feature evidently pagan elements, the connection to the glory and authority of the Imperium Romanum and the propagation of a certain continuity may have been a paramount motive. Scholars frequently work on these phenomena,2 but Scandinavia plays no role in this discussion, as there are no antique stone monuments in the 1 A. Esch, Wiederverwendung von Antike im Mitelalter. Die Sicht des Archäologen und die Sicht des Historikers, Hans-Lietmann-Vorlesungen, VII, Berlin 2005, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Picture Stones of Gotland: Type C and D Stones As Death Memorials
    THE PICTURE STONES OF GOTLAND: TYPE C AND D STONES AS DEATH MEMORIALS _______________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Comparative Cultural Studies University of Houston _______________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts _______________ By Kelsie H. Spears May, 2016 THE PICTURE STONES OF GOTLAND: TYPE C AND D STONES AS DEATH MEMORIALS _______________ An Abstract of a Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Comparative Cultural Studies University of Houston _______________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts _______________ By Kelsie H. Spears May, 2016 ABSTRACT This thesis focuses on the picture stones of Gotland, Sweden dating to the Viking Age. The Viking Age picture stones are made up of two groups, C and D, as delineated by Sune Lindqvist, dating to 700-1000 AD. Utilizing a basic hypothesis by Björn Varenius, which was applied to Early Iron Age picture stones, a research plan was created and applied to the stones of the Viking Age. An iconographic analysis was performed on six well-known stones found in the Gotland Museum and Swedish National Antiquity Museum. This iconographic analysis used the frequency of individual images and a correlation of images appearing together to interpret the basic thematic meaning of the iconography. A landscape discussion and context analysis was done on three sites, Buttle Änge, Fröjel Stenstugu, and Visne ängar, which had in situ picture stones. The landscape discussion sought to find significant features which could be connected to the stones and interpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • Gotland's Picture Stones
    GOTLAND Gotland’s Picture Stones Bearers of an Enigmatic Legacy otland’s picture stones have long evoked people’s fascination, whether this ’ Ghas been prompted by an interest in life in Scandinavia in the first millennium S PICTURE STONES or an appreciation of the beauty of the stones. The Gotlandic picture stones offer glimpses into an enigmatic world, plentifully endowed with imagery, but they also arouse our curiosity. What was the purpose and significance of the picture stones in the world of their creators, and what underlying messages nestle beneath their ima- gery and broader context? As a step towards elucidating some of the points at issue and gaining an insight into current research, the Runic Research Group at the Swe- dish National Heritage Board, in cooperation with Gotland Museum, arranged an inter national interdisciplinary symposium in 2011, the first symposium ever to focus exclu sively on Gotland’s picture stones. The articles presented in this publication are based on the lectures delivered at that symposium. of an Enigmatic Legacy Bearers ISBN 978-91-88036-86-5 9 789188 036865 GOTLAND’S PICTURE STONES Bearers of an Enigmatic Legacy gotländskt arkiv 2012 Reports from the Friends of the Historical Museum Association Volume 84 publishing costs have been defrayed by Kungl. Vitterhetsakademien, Wilhelmina von Hallwyls Gotlandsfond, Stiftelsen Mårten Stenbergers stipendiefond and Sällskapet DBW:s stiftelse editor Maria Herlin Karnell editorial board Maria Herlin Karnell, Laila Kitzler Åhfeldt, Magnus Källström, Lars Sjösvärd,
    [Show full text]
  • Viking Heritage 3-2005
    VV king king HeritageHeritagemagazine 3/2005 Högskolan på Gotland Gotland University Viking Heritage Magazine 3/05 Editorial IN THIS ISSUE Choosing Heaven The Religion of the Vikings 3–8 THE CHANGE OF RELIGION in the Viking Age – illustrated on the front page – is the subject of the two opening articles in this autumn issue. When the The Cross and the Sword – Viking Age began around 750 AD, most of Europe had already been Strategies of conversion converted to Christianity. In Scandinavia this process of transformation went in medieval Europe 9–13 on for several hundred years and the first churches were not built until The tidy metalworkers around 1100. of Fröjel 14–17 In the article Choosing heaven Gun Westholm tells about the Viking-age Norse Aesir cult – that, in turn, replaced an older fertility religion – and The Worlds of the Vikings about its origin and myths that might very well be depicted on Gotlandic – an exhibition at picture stones. Gotlands Fornsal, Visby 18–21 But how was the change from the old pagan faith into Christianity brought about? You will find some answers in the article The cross and the NEW BOOKS 21, 30–31, 35 sword where Alexandra Sanmark discusses the strategies of conversion in DESTINATION VIKING different places in medieval Europe. From Orkney we have received an interesting contribution to the debate The Fearless Vikings… 22–24 about whether the Vikings integrated with the indigenous Pictish people on Genocide in Orkney? the island or slaughtered them, when they took over the islands. Perhaps The fate of recent excavations can lead to new approaches to this debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Picture-Stone Workshops on Viking Age Gotland – a Study of Craftworkers’ Traces
    Picture-stone workshops on Viking Age Gotland 397 Laila Kitzler Åhfeldt Picture-stone workshops on Viking Age Gotland – a study of craftworkers’ traces Introduction The question underlying this investigation is whether Gotland’s Viking-Age picture stones were the subject of workshops and schools. One way of approaching this is to examine whether the use of templates and cut- ting techniques might show interrelationships between craftsmen and on this basis discuss different craft traditions. This study will thus examine if and how templates or stencils were used on Gotland’s Viking-Age picture stones and what cutting tech- niques were applied when reproducing the sails on the picture-stone ships. The point of departure for comparison of craft traditions is the Insular Celtic approach to orna- ment in contrast to the Romanized Continental. This is naturally a vast subject en- compassing considerable research, which cannot be fairly treated in this study, but some main observations will serve as a background to this discussion on the Got- landic picture-stone craft which has not been examined so much from the point of view of craftsmanship and techniques of carving, in contrast to for example, North- umbrian sculpture in northern England where there is an extensive discussion on gridding, measuring units, templates, etc. A selection of 18 picture stones from Sune Lindqvist’s C and D groups1 were ana- lysed with the help of a high resolution 3D-scanner (ATOS II). Several of these picture stones have already been extensively researched with regard to their picture content.2 I will concentrate primarily on the evidence for the use of templates and other methods of production that might reflect different craft-working traditions, connec- tions between groups of carvers, and any apparent priorities in pictorial represen- tation.
    [Show full text]
  • Gotland's Picture Stones
    GOTLAND Gotland’s Picture Stones Bearers of an Enigmatic Legacy otland’s picture stones have long evoked people’s fascination, whether this ’ Ghas been prompted by an interest in life in Scandinavia in the first millennium S PICTURE STONES or an appreciation of the beauty of the stones. The Gotlandic picture stones offer glimpses into an enigmatic world, plentifully endowed with imagery, but they also arouse our curiosity. What was the purpose and significance of the picture stones in the world of their creators, and what underlying messages nestle beneath their ima- gery and broader context? As a step towards elucidating some of the points at issue and gaining an insight into current research, the Runic Research Group at the Swe- dish National Heritage Board, in cooperation with Gotland Museum, arranged an inter national interdisciplinary symposium in 2011, the first symposium ever to focus exclu sively on Gotland’s picture stones. The articles presented in this publication are based on the lectures delivered at that symposium. of an Enigmatic Legacy Bearers ISBN 978-91-88036-86-5 9 789188 036865 GOTLAND’S PICTURE STONES Bearers of an Enigmatic Legacy gotländskt arkiv 2012 Reports from the Friends of the Historical Museum Association Volume 84 publishing costs have been defrayed by Kungl. Vitterhetsakademien, Wilhelmina von Hallwyls Gotlandsfond, Stiftelsen Mårten Stenbergers stipendiefond and Sällskapet DBW:s stiftelse editor Maria Herlin Karnell editorial board Maria Herlin Karnell, Laila Kitzler Åhfeldt, Magnus Källström, Lars Sjösvärd,
    [Show full text]