Allopatric Speciation in Asia Contributed to the Diversity
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. -
Taming the Wild Stewartia©
1 Boland-Tim-2019B-Taming-Stewartia Taming the Wild Stewartia© Timothy M. Boland and Todd J. Rounsaville Polly Hill Arboretum, 809 State Road, West Tisbury, Massachusetts 02575, USA [email protected] Keywords: Asexual propagation, native trees, plant collections, seeds, Stewartia SUMMARY The Polly Hill Arboretum (PHA) began working with native stewartia in 1967. Our founder, Polly Hill, was devoted to growing trees from seed. In 2006, the Polly Hill Arboretum was recognized as the Nationally Accredited Collection holder for stewartia. This status has guided our collection development, particularly on focused seed expeditions, which began in 2007. The PHA has been successful growing both species from seed, however, overwintering survival and transplanting of juvenile plants has proved more challenging. New insights into winter storage of seedlings is beginning to shed light on this problem. Experimentation with overwintering rooted cuttings has revealed that plants have preferred temperature and chilling requirements. These new overwintering protocols have thus far yielded positive results. Recent work with tissue culture has also shown promising results with both species. Future work includes grafting superior clones of our native stewartia onto Asiatic species in an effort to overcome the problematic issues of overwintering, transplantability, and better resistance to soil borne pathogens. Our Plant Collections Network (PCN) development plan outlines our next phase work with stewartia over the upcoming several years. The results of this work will be shared in future years as we continue to bring these exceptional small flowering trees into commercial production. 2 INTRODUCTION The commitment to building Polly Hill Arboretum’s (PHA) stewartia collection is based on our founder Polly Hill’s history with the genus and our own desire to encourage the cultivation of these superb small-flowering trees in home gardens. -
A List of Plants Recommended for Snow Creek Landscaping Projects
A List of Plants Recommended for Snow Creek Landscaping Projects This is intended to be a partial list of regional native plants that have proven to be reliably hardy in the Asheville area and conform to Snow Creek’s mission of developing sustainable landscapes. Plants with * in column D are thought to be resistant to deer browse. Please note that as the deer population increases and natural food supplies decrease deer may begin to feed off of plants included in this list. Column W ranks the water needs for each species from 1 to 3 with 3 being the highest moisture requirement. Newly installed plants require more water than usual. All plants have specific site requirements so please consult a reliable text for more detailed information about cultural requirements. The estimated height and spread of plants at maturity is given in feet. SHADE TREES: SPECIES CULTIVARS HT/SP FORM QUALITIES PROBLEMS D W Acer rubrum ‘Autumn 55/45 Broadly Can withstand wet or Shallow rooted, will * Red Maple Flame’ 60/50 ovate compacted soil, good not withstand high pH. 2 ‘Oct. Glory’ 50/30 Broadly red fall color, fast ‘Bowhall’ 60/50 ovate growing ‘Red Sunset’ Broadly Many others ovate Broadly ovate Acer x ‘Freemanii’ ‘Armstrong’ 60/25 Columnar Many of the same Somewhat shallow * 2 Hybrid Maple ‘Autumn 65/50 Ovate qualities as Red rooted Blaze’ 70/35 Ovate Maple but faster Not tolerant of high ‘Scarlet pH. Sentinel’ Acer saccharum ‘Gr. Mountain’ 70/40 Upright Excellent fall color, Requires a moist, * Sugar Maple ‘Legacy’ oval summer shade, fertile soil. -
Ecological Sustainability Will Probably Always Be Limited by Its Small Size and Fragmented Condition (See Section 3.5)
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service May 2011 Terrestrial Species Viability Evaluation for The Uwharrie National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Requirements in the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) ............................. 1 3.0 Ecosystem Diversity ..................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Spatial Scales for Ecosystem Diversity ................................................................... 4 3.2 Characteristics of Ecosystem Diversity ................................................................... 7 3.3 Range of Variation .................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Current Condition and Trend of Ecosystem Characteristics and Status of Ecosystem Diversity ..................................................................................................... 15 3.5 – Risks to Selected Characteristics of Ecosystem Diversity ................................... 20 3.6 Recommended Forest Plan Components ............................................................... 21 3.7 Assessing effects of Forest Plan alternatives on viability .................................... -
Trees, Shrubs, and Perennials That Intrigue Me (Gymnosperms First
Big-picture, evolutionary view of trees and shrubs (and a few of my favorite herbaceous perennials), ver. 2007-11-04 Descriptions of the trees and shrubs taken (stolen!!!) from online sources, from my own observations in and around Greenwood Lake, NY, and from these books: • Dirr’s Hardy Trees and Shrubs, Michael A. Dirr, Timber Press, © 1997 • Trees of North America (Golden field guide), C. Frank Brockman, St. Martin’s Press, © 2001 • Smithsonian Handbooks, Trees, Allen J. Coombes, Dorling Kindersley, © 2002 • Native Trees for North American Landscapes, Guy Sternberg with Jim Wilson, Timber Press, © 2004 • Complete Trees, Shrubs, and Hedges, Jacqueline Hériteau, © 2006 They are generally listed from most ancient to most recently evolved. (I’m not sure if this is true for the rosids and asterids, starting on page 30. I just listed them in the same order as Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II.) This document started out as my personal landscaping plan and morphed into something almost unwieldy and phantasmagorical. Key to symbols and colored text: Checkboxes indicate species and/or cultivars that I want. Checkmarks indicate those that I have (or that one of my neighbors has). Text in blue indicates shrub or hedge. (Unfinished task – there is no text in blue other than this text right here.) Text in red indicates that the species or cultivar is undesirable: • Out of range climatically (either wrong zone, or won’t do well because of differences in moisture or seasons, even though it is in the “right” zone). • Will grow too tall or wide and simply won’t fit well on my property. -
Native Vascular Plants
!Yt q12'5 3. /3<L....:::5_____ ,--- _____ Y)Q.'f MUSEUM BULLETIN NO.4 -------------- Copy I NATIVE VASCULAR PLANTS Endangered, Threatened, Or Otherwise In Jeopardy In South Carolina By Douglas A. Rayner, Chairman And Other Members Of The South Carolina Advisory Committee On Endangered, Threatened And Rare Plants SOUTH CAROLINA MUSEUM COMMISSION S. C. STATE LIR7~'· '?Y rAPR 1 1 1995 STATE DOCU~ 41 ;::,·. l s NATIVE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDANGERED, THREATENED, OR OTHERWISE IN JEOPARDY IN SOUTH CAROLINA by Douglas A. Rayner, Chairman and other members of the South Carolina Advisory Committee on Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants March, 1979 Current membership of the S. C. Committee on Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants Subcommittee on Criteria: Ross C. Clark, Chairman (1977); Erskine College (taxonomy and ecology) Steven M. Jones, Clemson University (forest ecology) Richard D. Porcher, The Citadel (taxonomy) Douglas A. Rayner, S.C. Wildlife Department (taxonomy and ecology) Subcommittee on Listings: C. Leland Rodgers, Chairman (1977 listings); Furman University (taxonomy and ecology) Wade T. Batson, University of South Carolina, Columbia (taxonomy and ecology) Ross C. Clark, Erskine College (taxonomy and ecology) John E. Fairey, III, Clemson University (taxonomy) Joseph N. Pinson, Jr., University of South Carolina, Coastal Carolina College (taxonomy) Robert W. Powell, Jr., Converse College (taxonomy) Douglas A Rayner, Chairman (1979 listings) S. C. Wildlife Department (taxonomy and ecology) INTRODUCTION South Carolina's first list of rare vascular plants was produced as part of the 1976 S.C. En dangered Species Symposium by the S. C. Advisory Committee on Endangered, Threatened and Rare Plants, 1977. The Symposium was a joint effort of The Citadel's Department of Biology and the S. -
* Correspondence To: Yujing Yan, Email: [email protected] Or Charles C
Supplementary Materials for Phytogeographic history of the Tea family inferred through high-resolution phylogeny and fossils *Yujing Yan1,2, *Charles C. Davis2, Dimitar Dimitrov1,3, Zhiheng Wang4, Carsten Rahbek5,1,4,6,7, Michael Krabbe Borregaard1 1. Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark 2. Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Ave, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 3. Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7800, 5020 Bergen, Norway 4. Institute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes of Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 5. Center for Global Mountain Biodiversity, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 6. Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silkwood Park campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK 7. Danish Institute for Advanced Study, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. * Correspondence to: Yujing Yan, email: [email protected] or Charles C. Davis, email: [email protected] This PDF file includes: Appendix 1 (p.4) Supplementary Notes 1 (p. 2-4) Supplementary Tables S1 to S11 (p.7-42) Supplementary Figures S1 to S10 (p.43-52) 1 Supplementary Note 1. Inference of biogeographical patterns using a fully Bayesian method in RevBayes We applied an alternative biogeographic method proposed by Landis et al. (2020) to a subset of our Theaceae empirical dataset and compared its performance to our method. This method uses a hierarchical Bayesian approach to account for the uncertainty in the position of fossils (lack of characters), phylogenetic relationships, and the geological/biogeographic template at once. -
Downloaded from Brill.Com10/11/2021 03:27:50AM Via Free Access 338 IAWA Bulletin N.S., Vol
IAWA Bulletin n.s., Vol. 11 (4), 1990: 337-378 WOOD ANATOMY OF TREES AND SHRUBS FROM CIllNA II. THEACEAE by Deng Liang! and Pieter Baas Rijksherbarium, P.O. Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Summary The wood anatomy of 95 species belong particularly in the Malesian Archipelago, con ing to fifteen genera of the Theaceae native to tinental Southeast Asia, and the Neotropics. China is described. Despite the wood anatom The delimitation of the family is still a matter ical homogeneity of the family it is possible of debate. For this study we have adopted to key out individual genera (p. 373) as long a concept of Theaceae, comprising the Tern as the unknown material is confined to Chi stroemioideae, Camellioideae (= Theoideae), nese species. In general the wood of Theaceae and Sladenia (Sladeniaceae of some authors). can be characterised by exclusively solitary This delimitation will be argued in a subse vessels, scalariform perforations, opposite to quent paper on the wood anatomy of Thea scalariform vessel wall pitting, ground tissue ceae from outside China (Deng & Baas, in of long fibre-tracheids, parenchyma scanty preparation). In the tropical and subtropical paratracheal and apotracheally diffuse, and southern part of China, the Theaceae are re heterocellular rays. presented by not less than 15 of its c.24 The two subfamilies Camellioideae and genera. The family includes a few economi Ternstroemioideae differ from each other in cally important timber trees (Schima, Adinan type of vessel-ray pits and number of bars. dra, Ternstroemia). The genus Camellia not Sladenia, often treated as a genus of the Thea only includes the tea plant (mainly Camellia ceae, is aberrant in having long vessel mul sinensis) but also many ornamental shrubs tiples and alternate intervessel pits. -
Juniperus Virginiana- Wiiqpedia Juniperus Virginiana
AGENDA EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP CONSERVANCY BOARD MEETING February 12, 2020- 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER/ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/ MOMENT OF SILENCE 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 8, 2020 3. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 4. OLD BUSINESS • 2020 Keep East Goshen Beautiful Day • 2020 Spring Event • Discuss 2020 goals and ABC Planning Meeting • East Goshen Ponds status (Marydel! and Bow Tree) 5. SUB DIVISION REVIEW 6. NEW BUSINESS • New Conservancy Board Member Appointments, Daniel Flynn & Leo Sinclair • Tree and Street Tree Resolution 7. VARIANCES/CONDITIONAL USES 8. BOARD MEMBER CONCERNS 9. LIAISON REPORTS 10. CORRESPONDENCE • Letter-January2 7, Zoning Hearing Board Notice 11. DATES OF IMPORTANCE Feb 13, 2020 Historical Commission 07:00pm Feb 17, 2020 Township Office Closed Feb 17, 2020 Futurist Committee 07:00pm Feb 18, 2020 Board of Supervisors 07:00pm Feb 24, 2020 Sustainability Advisory Committee 07:00pm Feb 27, 2020 Pipeline Task Force 05:00pm Mar 03, 2020 Board of Supervisors 07:00pm Mar 04, 2020 Planning Commission 07:00pm Mar 05, 2020 Park & Rec Commission 07:00pm Mar 09, 2020 Municipal Authority 07:00pm 12. PUBLIC COMMENT 13. ADJOURNMENT F:\Data\Shared Data\Agendas\Conservancy Board\2020\2020-02-l2_Conservancy Board Agenda.doc 1 DRAFT 2 EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP 3 CONSERVANCY BOARD MEETING 4 January 8, 2020 5 6 The East Goshen Township Conservancy Board held a regularly scheduled meeting on 7 Wednesday, January 8, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. at the Township Building. Members in attendance 8 are indicated in BOLD: 9 Chairman Walter Wujcik 10 Vice Chairman Andy Tyler 11 Erich Meyer 12 Sandra Snyder 13 Dan Flynn, new member 14 Others present were: 15 Michele Truitt, Township Supervisor 16 17 Call to Order 18 Walter called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. -
Stewartias 7
University of Delaware BotanicG ardens MISSION STATEMENT & GOALS The mission of the University of Delaware Botanic Gardens is to support the Education, Research, and Service missions of the Plant and Soil Sciences Department, and to provide an aesthetically pleasing environment for the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Contents 4 ............ Stewartias 7 ............ Plant Description Table 25 ............ Plant Sale Patrons 26 ............ Plant Sale Advertisers 36 ............ Plants Available Day of Sale 1 The I invite you to participate in the fourteenth annual University of Delaware Fourteenth Botanic Gardens (UDBG) plant sale. Please read the following information carefully, as several major changes were made in the sale this year. The plant Annual sale will occur at the following times: Friends Preview (New Time!) – Friday, April 28 from 8:00–10:00 AM in plastic greenhouse. UDBG Benefit Presale Pick-up – Friday, April 28 from 2:00–7:00 PM in plastic greenhouse (closing 1 hour earlier than in past years). Plant Sale Plant Sale – Saturday, April 29 from 9:30 AM–4:00 PM in plastic greenhouses. The sale will be located inside the fenced-in plastic greenhouses across from Fischer Greenhouse on the University of Delaware campus (north of the University of Delaware football stadium, adjacent to the Blue Ice Arena). The plant sale is organized by the Department of Plant and Soil Science faculty, staff and students in conjunction with the UDBG Friends and volunteers. NEW IN 2006: The UDBG Friends preview of the sale will move to Friday morning from 8:00–10:00 AM for its members. During this time, UDBG Friends will be able to pick up their preorders and/or purchase plants. -
Vascular Flora of The
VASCULAR FLORA OF THE UPPER ETOWAH RIVER WATERSHED, GEORGIA by LISA MARIE KRUSE (Under the Direction of DAVID E. GIANNASI) ABSTRACT The Etowah River Basin in North Georgia is a biologically diverse Southern Appalachian River system, threatened by regional population growth. This is a two-part botanical study in the Upper Etowah watershed. The primary component is a survey of vascular flora. Habitats include riparian zones, lowland forest, tributary drainages, bluffs, and uplands. A total of 662 taxa were inventoried, and seventeen reference communities were described and mapped. Small streams, remote public land, and forested private land are important for plant conservation in this watershed. In the second component, cumulative plant species richness was sampled across six floodplain sites to estimate optimal widths for riparian buffer zones. To include 90% of floodplain species in a buffer, 60-75% of the floodplain width must be protected, depending on the stream size. Soil moisture influences species richness, and is dependent on upland water sources. An optimal buffer would protect hydrologic connections between floodplains and uplands. INDEX WORDS: Etowah River, Southeastern United States, floristic inventory, riparian buffer zone, floodplain plant species, plant habitat conservation VASCULAR FLORA OF THE UPPER ETOWAH RIVER WATERSHED, GEORGIA by LISA MARIE KRUSE B.S., Emory University, 1996 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE -
ABSTRACT the First Through Fifth Instars of the Gypsy Moth Were Tested for Development to Adults on 326 Species of Dicotyledonous Plants in Laboratory Feeding Trials
LABORATORY FEEDING TESTS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF GYPSY MOTH LARVAE WITH REFERENCE TO PLANT TAXA AND ALLELOCHEMICALS JEFFREY C. MILLER and PAUL E. HANSON DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY, CORVALLIS, OREGON 97331 ABSTRACT The first through fifth instars of the gypsy moth were tested for development to adults on 326 species of dicotyledonous plants in laboratory feeding trials. Among accepted plants, differences in suitability were documented by measuring female pupal weights. The majority of accepted plants belong to the subclasses Dilleniidae, Hamamelidae, and Rosidae. Species of oak, maple, alder, madrone, eucalyptus, poplar, and sumac were highly suitable. Plants belonging to the Asteridae, Caryophyllidae, and Magnoliidae were mostly rejected. Foliage type, new or old, and instar influenced host plant suitability. Larvae of various instars were able to pupate after feeding on foliage of 147 plant species. Of these, 1.01 were accepted by first instars. Larvae from the first through fifth instar failed to molt on foliage of 151 species. Minor feeding occurred on 67 of these species. In general, larvae accepted new foliage on evergreen species more readily than old foliage. The results of these trials were combined with results from three previous studies to provide data on feeding responses of gypsy moth larvae on a total of 658 species, 286 genera, and 106 families of dicots. Allelochemic compositions of these plants were tabulated from available literature and compared with acceptance or rejection by gypsy moth. Plants accepted by gypsy moth generally contain tannins, but lack alkaloids, iridoid monoterpenes, sesquiterpenoids, diterpenoids, and glucosinolates. 2 PREFACE This research was funded through grants from USDA Forest Service cooperative agreement no.