Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 Lb (129,844 Kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas and Determina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 Lb (129,844 Kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas and Determina Class III / short line system inventory to determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) railcar operational status in Kansas and determination of ballast fouling using ground penetrating radar by LISA SHOFSTALL B.S., Kansas State University, 2015 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2017 Approved by: Major Professor Eric J. Fitzsimmons Abstract The rail industry's recent shift towards larger and heavier railcars has influenced Class III / short line railroad operation and track maintenance costs. Class III railroads earn less than $38.1 million in in annual revenue and generally operate first and last leg shipping for their customers. In Kansas, Class III railroads operate approximately 40 percent of the roughly 2,800 miles (4,500 km) of rail; however, due to the current Class III track condition they move lighter railcars at lower speeds than Class I railroads. The State of Kansas statutorily allots $5 million to support rail improvement projects, primarily for Class III railroads. Therefore, the objective of this study was to conduct an inventory of Kansas’s Class III rail network to identify the track segments in need of this support that would be most beneficial to the rail system. Representatives of each railroad were contacted and received a survey requesting information regarding the operational and structural status of their systems. The data collected were organized and processed to determine the sections of track that can accommodate the heavier axle load cars that are currently being utilized by Class I railroads. This study identified that Class III railroads shipped over 155,000 carloads of freight in 2016 and 30 percent of Kansas’s Class III track can currently accommodate heavy axle cars. The increased load from the increased railcar size has also increased the risk of damage to railroad’s track structure. Railroad ballast is the free draining granular material that supports the track structure. As the track ages, small particles can fill the voids of the granular material which is a process known as fouling. Established methods for determining the fouling of a section of ballast are destructive tests that usually require the railroad to restrict or reroute traffic on its network. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is a nondestructive geophysical surveying method that measures the time required for electromagnetic wave impulses to reflect off differing subsurface interfaces. Historically, GPR surveys of track structures primarily determine the depth of ballast and track geometry. The objective of this study was to determine the viability of utilizing the laboratory’s existing GPR equipment to develop a methodology of measuring ballast fouling nondestructively. A 48 x 48 x 48 in (1.2 x 1.2 x 1.2 m) test box was built. The test box was filled with 48 in (1.2 m) of clean and ballast. Tests were run on dry and partially saturated material, wetted using 6 gallons (22.7 L). GPR data were collected hourly for the first 6 hours, then at the multiples of 12 and 24 hour marks for one week. Sand was chosen as an absorbent geologic material for the second stage of testing since no fouled ballast could be acquired at the time of the study. A 27 x18 x 18 in (0.69 x 0.46 x 0.046 m) box was filled with sand and wetted with water in one gallon (7.5 L) increments. GPR scans and samples to determine the water content were collected after the addition of each gallon. The data collected were processed to determine soil properties. Preliminary results from this research indicate that the GPR set up utilized can effectively determine the dielectric constant of geologic materials including ballast, although the dielectric constant is highly dependent on the volumetric moisture content of the material. Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ ix Chapter 1 - Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Kansas Rail System ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 History of the Kansas Rail Funding Programs ..................................................................... 3 1.3 General Rail Inspection Methods ......................................................................................... 4 1.4 Study Objectives ................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Thesis Outline ....................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2 - Literature Review ......................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Railroad Classifications ........................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Railroad Classifications ........................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Staggers Act and the Influx of Class III Railroads ............................................................. 10 2.3 Economic Effects of Class III Railroads ............................................................................. 10 2.3.1 Employment Effects ..................................................................................................... 10 2.3.2 Abandonment Effects ................................................................................................... 12 2.3.3 Summary of the Effect of Class IIIs............................................................................. 15 2.4 Heavy Axle Loads .............................................................................................................. 16 2.4.1 Impact of Heavy Axle Loads on Class III Railroads ................................................... 17 2.5 Financial Support for Class III ............................................................................................ 19 2.5.1 Bank Funding ............................................................................................................... 20 2.5.2 Federal and State Funding ........................................................................................... 20 Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing ................................................... 21 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Grants ............................ 21 Railroad Track Maintenance Tax Credit (26 U.S.C. 45G) ........................................... 22 Annual Revolving Loans .............................................................................................. 22 Tax Benefits .................................................................................................................. 23 2.5.3 Class I Funding ............................................................................................................ 23 2.6 Overview of Railroad Ballast ............................................................................................. 23 iv 2.7 Detection of Fouled Ballast ................................................................................................ 27 2.7.1 Fundamentals of Ground Penetrating Radar ................................................................ 29 2.7 Previous GPR Rail Research .......................................................................................... 33 Chapter 3 - Methodology .............................................................................................................. 39 3.1 Class III Railroad Survey .................................................................................................... 39 3.2 Laboratory Setup and Instrumentation ............................................................................... 42 Chapter 4 - Results ........................................................................................................................ 46 4.1 Class III Carrier Systemwide Inventory ............................................................................. 46 4.2 Individual Class III Railroad Inventory .............................................................................. 55 4.2.1 Blue Rapids Railroad ................................................................................................... 55 4.2.2 Boothill and Western Railway ..................................................................................... 57 4.2.3 Cimarron Valley Railroad ............................................................................................ 58 4.2.4 Garden City Western Railway ..................................................................................... 60 4.2.5 Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad ................................................................................... 62 4.2.6 Kyle Railroad ............................................................................................................... 64 4.2.7 Missouri & Northern
Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks
    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
    [Show full text]
  • Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 Lb (129,844 Kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas
    Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 ▪ FINAL REPORT▪ August 2017 Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D. Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D. Lisa Shofstall Kansas State University Transportation Center 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) August 2017 Railcar Operational Status in Kansas 6 Performing Organization Code 7 Author(s) 7 Performing Organization Report Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D., Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D., Lisa Shofstall No. 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas State University Transportation Center Department of Civil Engineering 11 Contract or Grant No. 2109 Fiedler Hall C2069 Manhattan, Kansas 66506 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Kansas Department of Transportation Covered Bureau of Research Final Report 2300 SW Van Buren October 2015–December 2016 Topeka, Kansas 66611-1195 14 Sponsoring Agency Code RE-0691-01 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. The rail industry’s recent shift towards larger and heavier railcars has influenced Class III/short line railroad operation and track maintenance costs. Class III railroads earn less than $38.1 million in annual revenue and generally operate first and last leg shipping for their customers. In Kansas, Class III railroads operate approximately 40 percent of the roughly 2,800 miles (4,500 km) of rail; however, due to the current Class III track condition, they move lighter railcars at lower speeds than Class I railroads.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Plan 2005 - 2006
    Kansas Department of Transportation Rail Plan 2005 - 2006 Kathleen Sebelius, Governor Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning – Office of Rail Affairs Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning Office of Rail Affairs Dwight D. Eisenhower State Office Building 700 SW Harrison Street, Second Floor Tower Topeka, Kansas 66603-3754 Telephone: (785) 296-3841 Fax: (785) 296-0963 Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Terry Heidner, Division of Planning and Development Director Chris Herrick, Chief of Transportation Planning Bureau John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Prepared by CONTRIBUTORS Office of Rail Affairs Staff John W. Maddox, CPM, Rail Affairs Program Manager Darlene K. Osterhaus, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Edward Dawson, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Paul Ahlenius, P.E., Rail Affairs Engineer Bureau of Transportation Planning Staff John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau Carl Gile, Decision Mapping Technician Specialist OFFICE OF RAIL AFFAIRS WEB SITE http://www.ksdot.org/burRail/Rail/default.asp Pictures provided by railroads or taken by Office of Rail Affairs staff Railroad data and statistics provided by railroads 1 Executive Summary The Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 has Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1654 et seg). Financial been prepared in accordance with requirements of the assistance in the form of Federal Rail Administration Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) U.S. Department (FRA) grants has been used to fund rehabilitation of Transportation (USDOT), as set forth in federal projects throughout Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011
    Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011 Arizona Department of Transportation This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements The State Rail Plan was made possible by the cooperative efforts of the following individuals and organizations who contributed significantly to the successful completion of the project: Rail Technical Advisory Team Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Chris Watson, Arizona Corporation Commission Bonnie Allin, Tucson Airport Authority Reuben Teran, Arizona Game and Fish Department Zoe Richmond, Union Pacific Railroad David Jacobs, Arizona State Historic Preservation Office Jane Morris, City of Phoenix – Sky Harbor Airport Gordon Taylor, Arizona State Land Department Patrick Loftus, TTX Company Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Angela Mogel, Bureau of Land Management ADOT Project Team Jack Tomasik, Central Arizona Association of Governments Sara Allred, Project Manager Paul Johnson, City of Yuma Kristen Keener Busby, Sustainability Program Manager Jermaine Hannon, Federal Highway Administration John Halikowski, Director Katai Nakosha, Governor’s Office John McGee, Executive Director for Planning and Policy James Chessum, Greater Yuma Port Authority Mike Normand, Director of Transit Programs Kevin Wallace, Maricopa Association of Governments Shannon Scutari, Esq. Director, Rail & Sustainability Marc Pearsall, Maricopa Association of Governments Services Gabe Thum, Pima Association of Governments Jennifer Toth, Director, Multi-Modal Planning Division Robert Bohannan, RH Bohannan & Associates Robert Travis, State Railroad Liaison Jay
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Bjorklund Collection
    John F. Bjorklund Collection Finding Aid to the Collection at the Center for Railroad Photography & Art Prepared by Jordan Radke Last updated: 03/30/17 Collection Summary Title: John F. Bjorklund Collection Span Dates: 1950 – 2004 Bulk Dates: 1971 – 2001 Creator: Bjorklund, John F., 1939 – 2005 Extent: 99 metal cartons in 17 archival boxes (55,221 color slides); 17 linear feet Language: English Repository: Center for Railroad Photography & Art, Madison, WI Abstract: Color slides by John F. Bjorklund, from his collection of approximately 55,000 photographs, which his widow, Mrs. Rose Bjorklund, donated to the Center in 2011. The collection focuses on American and Canadian railroads from the late 1960s through the early 2000s, spanning much of North America. Selected Search Terms Country: Canada United States State/Province: Alberta Nevada Arizona New Brunswick Arkansas New Hampshire British Columbia New Jersey California New Mexico Colorado New York Idaho North Carolina Illinois North Dakota Indiana Nova Scotia Iowa Ohio Kansas Oklahoma Kentucky Ontario Louisiana Oregon Manitoba Pennsylvania Michigan Prince Edward Island Minnesota Quebec Missouri Saskatchewan Montana South Dakota Nebraska Tennessee John F. Bjorklund Collection 2 Texas Washington D.C. Utah West Virginia Vermont Wisconsin Virginia Wyoming Washington Railroad Name: Algoma Central Railway Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad Ann Arbor Railroad East Broad Top Railroad Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Arcade and Attica Railroad Erie Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Surcharge Tariff 92001
    FUEL SURCHARGE TARIFF 92001 FUEL SURCHARGE TARIFF 92001 NAMING FUEL SURCHARGES ON LOCAL, PROPORTIONAL AND JOINT LINE RATES EFFECTIVE: MAY 7, 2018 ISSUED: APRIL 16, 2018 EFFECTIVE: MAY 7, 2018 FUEL SURCHARGE TARIFF 92001 SUBSCRIBING CARRIERS This tariff is issued for the accounts of ARKANSAS MIDLAND RAILROAD AKMD ALABAMA & GULF COAST RAILWAY LLC AGR AN RAILWAY, L.L.C. AN ARIZONA & CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANY ARZC ARIZONA EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY AZER ARKANSAS LOUISIANA & MISSISIPPI RAILROAD COMPANY ALM ATLANTIC & WESTERN RAILWAY, L.P. ATW BAUXITE & NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY BXN BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC. BPRR CALIFORNIA NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY CFNR CAPE BRETON & CENTRAL NOVA SCOTIA RAILWAY LIMITED CBNS CAROLINA PIEDMONT RAILROAD CPDR CASCADE & COLUMBIA RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY CSCD CENTRAL OREGON & PACIFIC RAILROAD, INC CORP CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF INDIANAPOLIS CERA CHATTAHOOCHEE BAY RAILROAD, INC. CHAT CHATTAHOOCHEE INDUSTRIAL RAILROAD CIRR CHATTOOGA & CHICKAMAUGA RAILWAY CO. CCKY CHESAPEAKE & ALBEMARLE RAILROAD CA CHICAGO, FT. WAYNE & EASTERN RAILROAD CFE COLUMBUS & CHATTAHOOCHEE RAILROAD, INC. CCH COLUMBUS & GREENVILLE RAILWAY COMPANY CAGY COMMONWEALTH RAILWAY, INC. CWRY CONECUH VALLEY RAILROAD, L.L.C. COEH CONNECTICUT SOUTHERN RAILROAD, INC. CSO CORPUS CHRISTI TERMINAL RAILROAD, INC. CCPN DALLAS, GARLAND & NORTHEASTERN RAILROAD DGNO EAST TENNESSEE RAILWAY, L.P. ETRY EASTERN ALABAMA RAILWAY, LLC EARY FIRST COAST RAILROAD, INC. FCRD FORDYCE & PRINCETON RAILROAD COMPANY FP GALVESTON RAILROAD, L.P. GVSR GEORGIA CENTRAL RAILWAY, L.P. GC GEORGIA SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD, INC. GSWR GODERICH-EXETER RAILWAY COMPANY LIMITED GEXR GOLDEN ISLES TERMINAL RAILROAD, INC. GITM GOLDEN ISLES TERMINAL WHARF GITW GRAND RAPIDS EASTERN RAILROAD GR HEART OF GEORGIA RAILROAD, INC. HOG HILTON & ALBANY RAILROAD, INC. HAL HURON & EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 172/Wednesday, September 5, 2012/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2012 / Notices 54659 • Portland & Western Railroad, Inc.; • Kiamichi Railroad Co., LLC; [Assistance for the hearing impaired is • Riceboro Southern Railway, LLC; • Kyle Railroad Co.; available through the Federal • Rochester & Southern Railroad, Inc.; • Marquette Rail, LLC; Information Relay Service (FIRS) at: • Salt Lake City Southern Railroad • The Massena Terminal Railroad (800) 877–8339]. Co., Inc.; Co.; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: RETAC • Savannah Port Terminal Railroad • Mid-Michigan Railroad, Inc.; • arose from a proceeding instituted by Inc.; Michigan Shore Railroad, Inc.; the Board, in Establishment of a Rail • • South Buffalo Railway Co.; Missouri & Northern Arkansas Energy Transportation Advisory • St. Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad Railroad Co., Inc.; Committee, STB Docket No. EP 670. • New England Central Railroad, Inc.; Co.; RETAC was formed to provide advice • • North Carolina & Virginia Railroad Talleyrand Terminal Railroad Co., and guidance to the Board, and to serve Co., LLC; Inc.; as a forum for discussion of emerging • Tazewell & Peoria Railroad, Inc.; • Otter Tail Valley Railroad Co., Inc.; • • Point Comfort & Northern Railway issues regarding the transportation by Tomahawk Railway, LP; rail of energy resources, particularly, but • Utah Railway Co.; Co.; • • Puget Sound & Pacific Railroad; not necessarily limited to, coal, ethanol, Valdosta Railway, LP; and other biofuels. The purpose of this • The Warren & Trumbull Railroad Rockdale, • meeting is to continue discussions Co.; Sandow & Southern Railroad Co.; • • San Diego & Imperial Valley regarding issues such as rail Western Kentucky Railway, LLC; performance, capacity constraints, • Willamette & Pacific Railroad, Inc.; Railroad Co., Inc.; • infrastructure planning and • Wilmington Terminal Railroad, LP; San Joaquin Valley Railroad Co.; • development, and effective coordination • York Railway Co.; South Carolina Central Railroad among suppliers, carriers, and users of • Yorkrail, LLC; Co., LLC; • energy resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Appendices
    1 Contents Acronyms Used in this Rail Plan ......................................................................................................... 4 Glossary of Common Terms............................................................................................................... 6 Freight Railroad Carrier Profiles ...................................................................................................... 11 BNSF Railway ..................................................................................................................... 11 Union Pacific Railroad .......................................................................................................... 12 Cimarron Valley Railroad ....................................................................................................... 13 Colorado & Wyoming Railway ................................................................................................. 14 Denver Rock Island Railroad ................................................................................................... 14 Great Western Railway of Colorado .......................................................................................... 15 Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad ................................................................................................ 16 Kyle Railroad Company ......................................................................................................... 17 Nebraska Kansas & Colorado Railway ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kyle Railroad Company
    KYLE 3000-AI EFFECTIVE: October 1, 2020 KYLE RAILROAD COMPANY Freight Tariff 3000–AI (Cancels 3000-AC & all supplements thereto) Containing COMMODITY RATES FOR LOCAL AND PROPORTIONAL FREIGHT MOVEMENTS AND GOVERNING RULES AND REGULATIONS AND SURCHARGES ALSO SHOWING OFFICIAL DISTANCES BETWEEN STATIONS ON KYLE RAILROAD COMPANY BETWEEN AND KYLE Stations in Kansas and Colorado KYLE Stations in Kansas and Colorado *This Tariff is also applicable on Colorado and Kansas Intrastate traffic except where expressly provided to the contrary in connection with particular items or rates. *Governed, except as otherwise provided herein, by the Uniform Freight Classification (See Item 20). *(Provisions formerly published and not brought forward are hereby cancelled account obsolete) *Any services not covered by the charges in this document are subject to the rules and provisions of the General Tariff 1000-series and 7006-series, 6006-series, & 6007-series Charge Catalogs for each road. ISSUED: October 14, 2020 EFFECTIVE: October 1, 2020 Issued By: KYLE Railroad Company Commercial Support 13901 Sutton Park Dr. South, Suite 270 Jacksonville, FL 32224 1 | P a g e KYLE 3000-AI EFFECTIVE: October 1, 2020 KYLE RAILROAD COMPANY TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL: PAGE NO. ➢ ABBREVIATIONS, EXPLANATION OF 18 ➢ JUNCTIONS AND INTERCHANGE POINTS, LIST OF 4 ➢ MILEAGES, KYLE 5 ,6 ➢ REFERENCE MARKS, EXPLANATION OF 18 ➢ STATIONS, ALPHABETICAL LIST OF 3 ➢ STATIONS, GEOGRAPHICAL LIST OF 2 RULES & OTHER GOVERNING PROVISIONS - GENERAL RULES & REGULATIONS: ITEM NO. ➢ CANCELING ITEMS,
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …
    Freight Railroads in Colorado Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads ….............................................................................................................................................................14 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................2,636 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................2,259 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$122,910 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................8,400 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$223 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 7.7 million additional trucks to handle the 138.9 million tons of freight that moved by rail in Colorado in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 16.8 million Total Carloads: 204,200 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Coal 7.5 64,100 Glass and Stone 1.6 15,600 Farm Products 1.5 15,000
    [Show full text]
  • Gcorgeneral Code of Operating Rules
    GCORGeneral Code of Operating Rules Eighth Edition Eff ective April 1, 2020 These rules govern the operation of the adopting railroads and supersede all previous GCOR rules and instructions. © 2020 General Code of Operating Rules Committee, All Rights Reserved i-2 GCOR—Eighth Edition—April 1, 2020 Bauxite & Northern Railway Company Front cover photo by William Diehl Bay Coast Railroad Adopted by: The Bay Line Railroad, L.L.C. Belt Railway Company of Chicago Aberdeen Carolina & Western Railway BHP Nevada Railway Company Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad B&H Rail Corp Acadiana Railway Company Birmingham Terminal Railroad Adams Industries Railroad Blackwell Northern Gateway Railroad Adrian and Blissfield Railroad Blue Ridge Southern Railroad Affton Terminal Railroad BNSF Railway Ag Valley Railroad Bogalusa Bayou Railroad Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway LLC Boise Valley Railroad Alabama Southern Railroad Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc. Alabama & Tennessee River Railway, LLC Burlington Junction Railway Alabama Warrior Railroad Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railroad Alaska Railroad Corporation C&J Railroad Company Albany & Eastern Railroad Company California Northern Railroad Company Aliquippa & Ohio River Railroad Co. California Western Railroad Alliance Terminal Railway, LLC Camas Prairie RailNet, Inc. Altamont Commuter Express Rail Authority Camp Chase Railway Alton & Southern Railway Canadian Pacific Amtrak—Chicago Terminal Caney Fork & Western Railroad Amtrak—Michigan Line Canon City and Royal Gorge Railroad Amtrak—NOUPT Capital Metropolitan Transportation
    [Show full text]