DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix A-4 Forks of the Thames EIS DRAFT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix A-4 Forks of the Thames EIS DRAFT Appendix A-4 Forks of the Thames EIS DRAFT ONE RIVER MASTER PLAN FORKS OF THE THAMES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY CITY OF LONDON THAMES RIVER Report Prepared for: JACOBS AND THE CITY OF LONDON Prepared by: MATRIX SOLUTIONS INC. Version 0.3 March 2019 Guelph, Ontario 7B- 650 Woodlawn Road West Guelph, Ontario N1K 1B8 T 519.772.3777 F 519.648.3168 www.matrix-solutions.com DRAFT ONE RIVER MASTER PLAN FORKS OF THE THAMES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Report prepared for Jacobs and The City of London, March 2019 reviewed by Karen Reis, B.E.S. (Hons) Arnie Fausto, M.Sc. Ecologist Senior Ecologist contributor Martine Esraelian, B.Sc. Terrestrial Ecologist DISCLAIMER Information collected in the EIS may be used by the City of London to contribute to its programs as well as those of the Conservation Authorities, other member municipalities and the province. Matrix Solutions Inc. certifies that this report is accurate and complete and accords with the information available during the project. Information obtained during the project or provided by third parties is believed to be accurate but is not guaranteed. Matrix Solutions Inc. has exercised reasonable skill, care, and diligence in assessing the information obtained during the preparation of this report. This report was prepared for Jacobs and The City of London. The report may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the written consent of Matrix Solutions Inc. and of Jacobs and The City of London. Any uses of this report by a third party, or any reliance on decisions made based on it, are the responsibility of that party. Matrix Solutions Inc. is not responsible for damages or injuries incurred by any third party, as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this report. 24504-528 Forks of the Thames EIS 2019-03-29 draft V0.3.docx ii Matrix Solutions Inc. DRAFT VERSION CONTROL Version Date Issue Type Filename Description V0.1 29-Oct-2018 Draft 24504-528 Back to the River EIS 2018-10-29 draft V0.1.docx Issued to client for review V0.2 05-Dec-2018 Draft 24504-528 Back to the River EIS 2018-12-05 draft V0.2.docx Issued to client for review with revisions V0.3 29-Mar-2019 Draft 24504-528 Forks of the Thames EIS 2019-03-29 draft Issued to client for review with revisions V0.3.docx TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviations Description BSC Bird Studies Canada CBC Christmas Bird Count COSEWIC Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada COSSARO Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario The Forks Confluence of the North and South Thames Rivers DFO Department of Fisheries and Oceans EA Environmental Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Study ELC Ecological Land Classification END Endangered ESA Environmentally Significant Areas ESA, 2007 Endangered Species Act, 2007 FBI Family Biotic Index MNRF Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry NAR Not at Risk NHIC Natural Heritage Information Centre NSRI Natural Resource Solutions Inc. OBA Ontario Butterfly Atlas OBBA Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas OMA Ontario Mammal Atlas OOA Ontario Odonata Atlas ORAA Ontario Reptile and Amphibian Atlas PPS Provincial Policy Statement Project Site The Forks of the Thames River River Thames River SAR Species at Risk SARA Species at Risk Act SARO Species at Risk Ontario SC Special Concern SCC Species of Conservation Concern SLSR Subject Land Status Report SRANK Subnational Rank Study Area Project Site and the 120 m setback The City City of London THR Threatened UTRCA Upper Thames River Conservation Authority WSC Water Survey of Canada 24504-528 Forks of the Thames EIS 2019-03-29 draft V0.3.docx iii Matrix Solutions Inc. DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Matrix Solutions Inc. was retained by the City of London (the City) in March 2018 to complete an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) to support the Municipal Class Schedule B Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Fork of the Thames. The Schedule B Class EA is being conducted as part of Stage 2 of the One River Master Plan EA (Master Plan). The Schedule B EA was initiated by the City, after the completion of Stage 1 of the Master Plan, upon confirmation by City Council in January 2018 that Springbank Dam will not be re-instated. The preferred Forks of the Thames alternative has been defined as a suspended walkway and softscape terracing along the eastern shoreline of the Thames River. The design is intended to re-shape the existing parkland, drawing the community to the urban centre along the waterfront. The EIS describes the significant natural heritage features and functions within the Study Area and identifies what potential impacts the preferred alternative may have on the significant features and functions. Based on the assessment, the EIS recommends strategies to avoid or mitigate the potential impacts which are incorporated into the project approval. Matrix combined information gathered from the ecological field studies with relevant information from previous background studies to characterize the natural heritage setting and identify significant features within the Study Area. The results of the significance and sensitivity analysis indicated the presence of several natural heritage features and functions, including Significant Valleylands, Significant Wildlife Habitat (SWH), fish and aquatic habitat, and Species at Risk (SAR) within the Study Area. The potential effects that may be caused by the implementation of the preferred alternative (i.e., suspended walkway ribbon design, combined with softscape bank terracing) were evaluated against the identified natural heritage features. The results of the assessment indicated that the potentially negative impacts associated with the preferred alternative are low if mitigation measures and recommendations are followed. The softscape terracing and suspended walkway, along with construction access, staging, and vegetation clearing are expected to alter the existing vegetation communities in Ivey Park. The alteration of these communities is not anticipated to have long-term negative impacts, as it primarily affects non-native and invasive vegetation species which are currently present within the project area. The non-native and invasive species will be removed as part of the London Invasive Plant Management Strategy, and replaced with native trees and shrub plantings throughout the Park as part of the softscape design. The removal of the gabion baskets along the eastern edge of the river will improve the connection between the aquatic and terrestrial environment, as well as provide more stable slope conditions along the bank. As the completed works are expected to increase the level of pedestrian activity within Ivey Park, this should not result in additional impacts as this park is already an area of high human presence. Strategic accessibility, monitoring, and signage are recommended during the detailed design phase to direct the 24504-528 Forks of the Thames EIS 2019-03-29 draft V0.3.docx iv Matrix Solutions Inc. DRAFT public away from any sensitive areas within the Thames River. No SAR or Species of Conservation Concern are expected to be directly impacted by the design; however, it is important to direct access to the river away from sensitive areas to avoid any indirect impacts from the public. It is recommended that consultation and permitting/approvals discussion with the appropriate regulatory authorities be conducted before any construction work is commenced. This document was reviewed by Matrix Solutions Senior Ecologist, Arnel Fausto. Their comments and recommendations have been incorporated into this report. 24504-528 Forks of the Thames EIS 2019-03-29 draft V0.3.docx v Matrix Solutions Inc. DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. iv 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Report Purpose ................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Project Study Area .............................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Environmental Impact Study Objectives ............................................................................. 5 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Federal Legislation .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1.1 Fisheries Act ........................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Migratory Birds Convention Act ............................................................................. 7 2.2 Provincial Legislation .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Environmental Assessment Act .............................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Provincial Policy Statement ................................................................................... 8 2.2.3 Endangered Species Act ......................................................................................... 8 2.2.4 Conservation Authorities Act ................................................................................. 8 2.2.5 Upper Thames Conservation Authority ................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toronto Field Naturalists 20 College St., Unit 4 Toronto, Ont
    TORONTO FIELD NATURALIST Number 422 October 1991 ✓. · -...___~ ~-::;:~=---~~ ..;~-~~-----· .... ~~✓w,~- Inside Amphibians & reptiles 8 Plants 5,14,17,2J,24,25 Birds 1,6,7,9,24,26-27 Reading 9- 10 Coming events 29 TFN - meetings 2 Don watershed 18-22,24 newsletter submissions 15 Invertebrates 6,13,15,23,25 outings 2,3-5 Issues 6,11-15,16,17,26-27 Weather 28 TFN 422 - 2 TFN MEETINGS Monday, October 7 - THE GEOLOGY OF WASTE: THE GARBAGE CRISIS IN ONTAR I O a t 8 pm an illustrated lecture by Dr. Nick Eyles from Scarborough College of the University of Toronto 155 College St. Dr. Eyles has done extensive research on the Scarborough bluffs and the Don Valley Brick Yard. He is an expert on ground water 6th floor auditorium -- a topic which we should all know roore about. It is only by understanding roore about the irovernent of water underground that we can avoid polluting our drinking water supplies when we locate garbage dumps in unsuitable places. Come and bring your friends with you to this ~rtant meeting. - from 7 IXl1 to 8 IXl1 TFN holds a social hour just outside the lecture auditorium - memberships and publications are for sale - a display of the art of Jean McGill Next Meeting: Monday, November 4, 1991 FOR ENJO YMENT OF TFN OUTINGS, REMEMBER THE FOLLOWING: free camera TTC RIDE GUIDE thermos or flask Metro map notebook &pen snack - Bring your family ~ keys and/or friends NO pets money TTC fare TO HELP PR OTECT THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, CONTACT THE FOLL OWING: air or wa ter pollution complaints: 424-3000 debris in valleys: 661-6600 TFN 422 - 3 TFNOUTINGS October Wednesday BES'IVIEW - nature walk East Don, North York Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Change and Hydrological Model Parameterization of Coyle Creek
    Temporal Change and Hydrological 2009 Model Parameterization of Coyle Creek DECEMBER 14TH, 2009 Temporal Change and Hydrological Model Parameterization of Coyle Creek Proposal 2009 December 14th, 2009 December 14th, 2009 Temporal Change and Hydrological 2009 Model Parameterization of Coyle Creek File No: 200910-13 GISC9314-Deliverable 5 Mr. Ian Smith, M.Sc., OLS, OLIP President, Geomorphologist LydIan Environmental Consulting 21 Longspur Circle Fonthill, ON L0S 1E2 Dear Mr. Smith, Re: Temporal Change and Historical Hydrologic Model Parameterization – Coyle Creek Watershed Proposal iL Mondo strives for the highest quality of services to deliver to our clients. We will provide outstanding results, the best solution for your problem at Coyle Creek and professional interactions with our clients. Please accept this letter as our formal proposal for LydIan Environmental Consulting on the Temporal Change and Historical Hydrologic Model Parameterization – Coyle Creek Watershed project. This proposal includes all the requirements LydIan Environmental Consulting has provided to us. This Proposal also includes the time length this project will take to complete which is approximately 340 hours, being complete by June 2nd, 2010. The budget for this project is estimated at $41,235. Please find time and cost management details attached. We have proposed all requirements that LydIan Environmental Consulting has requested from our company on this project. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed documents, please contact any project member at your convenience Lisa at (905) 818 8489, [email protected] or Rudy Stawarek at (905) 730-7020, [email protected]. Thank you for your time and attention. We look forward to hearing from you.
    [Show full text]
  • The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae
    The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae March 2011 Niagara River RAP Welland River Eutrophication Study Technical Working Group The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae March 2011 Written by: Joshua Diamond Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority On behalf of: Welland River Eutrophication Technical Working Group The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern in Support of the Beneficial Use Impairment: Eutrophication and Undesirable Algae Written By: Joshua Diamond Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority On Behalf: Welland River Eutrophication Technical Working Group Niagara River Remedial Action Plan For more information contact: Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Valerie Cromie, Coordinator Niagara River Remedial Action Plan Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority 905-788-3135 [email protected] The Welland River Eutrophication Study in the Niagara River Area of Concern Welland River Eutrophication Study Technical Working Group Ilze Andzans Region Municipality of Niagara Valerie Cromie Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Sarah Day Ontario Ministry of the Environment Joshua Diamond Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Martha Guy Environment Canada Veronique Hiriart-Baer Environment Canada Tanya Labencki Ontario Ministry of the Environment Dan McDonell Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting #4/13
    Executive Committee Meeting #4/13 Chair: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair: Maria Augimeri Members: Ben Cachola Ronald Chopowick Glenn De Baeremaeker Michael Di Biase Jack Heath Colleen Jordan Gloria Lindsay Luby Mike Mattos Jim Tovey Richard Whitehead June 7, 2013 11:00 A.M. FLAG ROOM, MIMICO CRUISING CLUB, 220 HUMBER BAY PARK RD. W., TORONTO, AGENDA EX1. MINUTES OF MEETING #3/13, HELD ON MAY 10, 2013 Minutes Summary Enclosed Herewith on PINK EX2. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES EX3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF EX4. DELEGATIONS EX5. PRESENTATIONS EX6. CORRESPONDENCE 1 EX7. SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION EX7.1 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed Geranium Homes (Ninth Line) Limited CFN 49273 28 EX7.2 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed 3E Capital Inc. CFN 49284 31 EX7.3 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL Conveyance of Land and a Permanent Easement for the Gore Road Widening , City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, Humber River Watershed CFN 49221 34 EX7.4 SWAN LAKE RESIDENCE RETROFIT AND RENOVATION PROJECT Tender PMO13-04 37 EX8. SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION EX8.1 CANADA GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL GREATER TORONTO CHAPTER Continuation of Partnership Agreement 41 EX8.2 MUD CREEK REACH 5 PROJECT Contract RSD13-053 45 EX9. SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD EX10 ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06 PERMIT APPLICATIONS EX10.1 - EX10.6 ARE MAJOR APPLICATIONS Applications that involved a more complex suite of technical studies to demonstrate consistency with policies; applications that cover a significant geographic area (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Toronto Ravines Study: 1977-2017 Long-Term Changes in the Biodiversity and Ecological Integrity of Toronto’S Ravines
    The Toronto Ravines Study: 1977-2017 Long-term Changes in the Biodiversity and Ecological Integrity of Toronto’s Ravines Eric Davies, Anqi Dong, Catherine Berka, Paul Scrivener, Dale Taylor, Sandy M Smith Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto - July 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report would not have come into being without the work of the many individuals who dedicated endless volunteer hours to its realization. Our thanks to: The originators of the 1977 study, our co-authors Paul Scrivener and Dale Taylor, for sticking with the project over the past 40 years, and for getting it going again. Dale and Paul provided the team with a real-life example of ‘citizen science’ in action, and a generational timeline to the past. They made this project an adventure for all of us. Good stewardship of the land is a lifelong affair, and Dale and Paul have exemplified that commitment beyond all expectations. Esther McNeil for walking into the University of Toronto, Faculty of Forestry six years ago and asking: “How can I help save the Toronto ravines?” Esther inspired us to start working in the Toronto ravines, which ultimately led to this project, this report, and a renewed interest in ravine conservation. Catherine Berka for jumping with two feet into this project from day one, and for providing an endless source of positivity, leadership, humour, community outreach, and every day hard work. The project would simply not be what it is today without the heart and soul of our other co-author, Catherine. This project has benefited tremendously from the expertise, cooperation, and guidance of many people, especially in The City of Toronto, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, local nature groups, and countless citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Erosion Risk Management Program Update Toronto And
    June 2, 2020 Sent via email SEE DISTRIBUTION LIST RE: 2020 Erosion Risk Management Program Update Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Board of Directors, at its meeting #3/20, held on April 24, 2020, adopted Resolution #A41/20 as follows: WHEREAS TRCA staff were requested by the Executive Committee at meeting #3/19 to provide more information regarding the positive impact that the Federal Disaster Mitigation & Adaptation Fund will have on TRCA’s plans for erosion mitigation work; IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT this staff report on TRCA’s Erosion Risk Management Program and the positive impacts of Federal Disaster Mitigation & Adaptation Fund and partner contributions be received; AND FURTHER THAT this report be circulated to TRCA’s municipal partners. The report and referenced resolution are attached to this letter and can also be accessed at the TRCA Board of Directors webpage. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Matthew Johnston at 416-661-6600 ext. 5525, [email protected]. Sincerely, Alisa Mahrova Clerk and Manager, Policy c: John MacKenzie, Chief Executive Officer, TRCA Moranne McDonnel, Director, Restoration and Infrastructure, TRCA Matthew Johnston, Senior Manager, Erosion Risk Management, TRCA Ashour Rehana, Manager, Capital and Special Projects, TRCA DISTRIBUTION LIST Alexander Harras, Manager, Legislative and Information Services /Deputy Clerk, Town of Ajax Amanda Fusco, Acting Town Clerk, Town of Caledon Christopher Raynor, Regional Clerk, Regional Municipality of York Debbie
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Variance Report for the Twelve Months Ended December
    BU19.6 APPENDIX 5 Capital Dashboard by Program/Agency For the Period ended December 31, 2019 Table of Content Program/Agency Page # Community and Social Summary 2 Children's Services 3 Court Services 6 Economic Development & Culture 8 Seniors Services & Long­Term Care 11 Parks, Forestry & Recreation 13 Shelter, Support & Housing Administration 17 Toronto Employment & Social Services 20 Toronto Paramedic Services 22 Infrastructure and Development Summary 24 City Planning 25 Fire Services 27 Transportation Services 30 Waterfront Revitalization Initiative 35 Corporate Services Summary 38 311 Toronto 39 Facilities & Real Estate 41 Fleet Services 45 Technology Services 48 Finance and Treasury Summary 53 Financial Services 54 Other City Programs 57 Office of the Lobbyist Registrar 58 City Clerk's Office 60 Agencies Summary 63 Exhibition Place 64 TO Live 66 Toronto & Region Conservation Authority 68 Toronto Police Service 71 Toronto Public Health 76 Toronto Public Library 78 Toronto Zoo 81 Toronto Transit Commission 83 Yonge Dundas Square 87 Rate Supported Programs Summary 89 Solid Waste Management 90 Toronto Parking Authority 94 Toronto Water 97 2019 Capital Spending by Program Community and Social Services 2019 Expenditure Alert (Benchmark 2019 Approved YTD Year­End Trending 70% spending Cash Flow % at Year End Program Spending Projection rate) 4M 26.77 1.04 14.48 54.1% ⓎⓎⓎ Q2 22.28 1.64 14.48 65.0% ⓎⓎⓎ Children's Services Q3 22.33 3.05 8.12 36.4% ⓇⓇⓇ Q4 22.33 5.04 5.04 22.6% ⓇⓇⓇ 4M 0.06 0.00 0.06 100.0% ⒼⒼⒼ Q2 0.06 0.01 0.06 100.0% ⒼⒼⒼ
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology and Application of a Statistical Approach to the Universal Soil Loss Equation (Usle): Welland River Case Study
    Middle States Geographer, 1996, 29:105-113 METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATION OF A STATISTICAL APPROACH TO THE UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION (USLE): WELLAND RIVER CASE STUDY Shannon L. Vickers1 , Kim N. Irvine2, and Ian G. Droppo3 1. Department of Geography, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1. 2. Department of Geography and Planning, State University College, Buffalo, NY 14222. 3. National Water Research Institute, Burlington, Ontario, Canada, L7R 4A6. ABSTRACI': The WeI/and River watershed drains an area of 880 km2 and is part of the Niagara River Area of Concem. As one step towards remediation, the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) was used to estimate soil erosion inputs to the river from each of the 34 sub-basins in the watershed. An innovative approach using risk and uncertainty analysis was incorporated into the conventional USLE estimates in order to address concems about uncertainty due to the variability of the USLE parameters across the WeI/and River watershed. This paper describes the methodology for the statistical approach to the USLE and those sub-basins with high potential soil loss were identified. INTRODUCflON (USLE) was used to estimate soil erosion rates for each of the 34 sub-basins in the watershed. A risk and uncertainty analysis (including probability The Welland River watershed is part of the distribution fitting and simulations using Latin Niagara River Area of Concern. Areas of Concern Hypercube sampling) was incorporated into the around the Great Lakes have been designated by conventional USLE estimates and was performed the International Joint Commission (DC) as using BESTFIT and @RISK, which are EXCEL exhibiting various environmental impairments.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of 28 the Wa by Kim Tai T Have Shapedit Through Toront Surround and Run ROM Magazine Spring2011 and Mary Burridge Terways 2 O S S Pas Tha O O T T
    a History Of TO s H 2 O By Kim TaiT and mary Burridge The waTerways ThaT surround and run Through ToronTo have shaped iTs pasT Photos: TK Photos: 28 ROM Magazine Spring 2011 The name Toronto likely derives from the mohawk word Tkaronto, meaning “where there are trees standing in the water.” Fish-Market, Toronto, circa 1838. Modern reproduction of a hand-coloured engraving by W. H. Bartlett Photos: TK Photos: (1809–1854). ROM Magazine Spring 2011 29 or more Than Two cenTuries, an abundant supply of fresh water has fuelled Toronto’s growth and prosperity. The city’s many waterways have offered pleasurable places for recreation and abundant sources of fresh food, but they’ve also been the source of outbreaks of cholera and typhoid fever. In many ways, Toronto’s water has shaped the city we know today. Toronto’s six waterways—the Etobicoke, charge of guarding against future infectious diseases. But the city’s Mimico, Humber, and Don rivers, Highland numerous waterways made it particularly vulnerable to epidemics Creek, and the Rouge River—drain into Lake of water-borne illnesses and the board was not able to prevent Ontario along 157 kilometres of constantly outbreaks of typhoid fever in 1845 and 1847 and of cholera in 1849, changing shoreline. The first settlements in the 1854, and 1866. Toronto region, established by the Petun and In the early 1860s, before unsanitary water was discovered to be Neutrals, were strategically located near the the cause of the cholera outbreaks, Taddle Creek was dammed to mouths of the Humber and the Rouge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corporation of the City of Welland Official Plan
    THE CORPORATIONOF THE CITY OF WELLAND Q,FFICIAL PLAN Revised: November 4, 2019 [this page is intentionally blank] AMENDMENT BY‐LAW BY‐LAW DATE APPROVAL PURPOSE NUMBER NUMBER DATE 1 2012‐64 February 25, 2013 OMB ORDER High Density Issue Date Residential Section February 25, 4.2.3.20.A (529 South 2013 Pelham Road 2 2013‐95 July 16, 2013 August 13, 2013 Low Density Residential Section 4.2.3.20.C 3 2013‐104 August 12, 2013 September 10, Medium Density 2013 Residential Section 4.2.3.20.D (Coyle Creek Estates Phase 6 Subdivision 4 2013‐110 August 27, 2013 September 26, Area 3: Canadian Tire 2016 Financial Site Section 6.7.3.1 to 6.7.3.4 (475, 55 and 635 Princes Charles Drive) Low Density Residential Section 4.2.2.2.B Parks, Open Space and Recreational Section 6.2.2.1.B Site Plan Control Section 7.8.1 (Various City‐owned Facilities) 5 2013‐118 September 10, October 10, 2013 High Density 2013 Residential Section 4.2.3.20.E (1 Griffith Street) 6 2014‐89 July 15, 2014 August 7, 2014 Community Commercial Corridor Section 4.4.3.13.B (152 Hellems Avenue and 131 Young Street) 7 2014‐138 October 7, 2014 November 11, Core Natural Heritage 2014 System, Open Space & Recreation, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Area Specific Low Density Residential and Area Specific Medium Density Residential Section 4.4.3.13.D (Sparrow Meadows Estates Subdivision) 8 2015‐58 May 19, 2015 File closed by Community OMB September Commercial Corridor 21, 2015 June Section 4.4.3.13.E (142 23, 2015 and 144A Thorold Road) 9 2015‐58 May 19, 2015 File closed by
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto's Natural Environment Trail Strategy
    Natural Environment Trail Strategy June 2013 City of Toronto Prepared by LEES+AssociatesLandscape Architects and Planners with ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The City of Toronto’s Natural Environment Trail Strategy is a product of over fifteen years of cumulative trail management experiences, outreach, stewardship and efforts by many groups and individuals. We would like to thank the following people who helped create, shape and inform the strategy in 2012: Natural Environment Trails Program Working Group Garth Armour Jennifer Kowalski Rob Mungham Michael Bender Scott Laver Brittany Reid Edward Fearon Roger Macklin Alex Shevchuk Norman DeFraeye Beth Mcewen Karen Sun Ruthanne Henry Brian Mercer Ed Waltos Natural Environment Trails Program Advisory Team Lorene Bodiam Jennifer Hyland Jane Scarffe Christina Bouchard Dennis Kovacsi William Snodgrass Susanne Burkhardt Sibel Sarper Jane Weninger Susan Hughes City of Toronto Teresa Bosco Jennifer Gibb Wendy Strickland Jack Brown Jim Hart Richard Ubbens Chris Clarke Janette Harvey Mike Voelker Chris Coltas Amy Lang Soraya Walker Jason Doyle Nancy Lowes Cara Webster Carlos Duran Cheryl Post Sean Wheldrake Jason Foss Kim Statham Alice Wong Councillor Mary Fragedakis Christine Speelman Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Adele Freeman Alexis Wood Adam Szaflarski Amy Thurston Keri McMahon Vince D’Elia Arlen Leeming Steven Joudrey Susan Robertson Natural Environment Trail Strategy Project Team Lees+Associates Azimuth Decarto Sustainable Trails The Planning Environmental Consulting, Ltd. Ltd. Partnership consulting,
    [Show full text]
  • MUD CREEK LOST RIVERS LOOP (Moore Ave., Milkmans Walane, Mount Pleasant, St
    MUD CREEK LOST RIVERS LOOP (Moore Ave., Milkmans WaLane, Mount Pleasant, St. l Clair k loop) Experience a walk along routes of three buried waterways, all hidden from public view decades ago in the interest of progress. Enjoy the natural serenity of living ponds on the former site of Toronto’s largest brick works, right in the heart of the city. Public Transit: Getting there; Saturday only 28A TTC Bus from Davisville Subway station. Free daily Evergreen shuttle bus from Broadview Subway For over 100 years, this the metal plate are some of the Lost station. 1 unique property was home to Rivers of the Don Watershed; The Getting home; Take the 28A TTC Bus back to Davisville Subway Station or return to the Don Valley Brick Works. The site large Exploring the Lower Don map Broadview Subway station via the Evergreen shuttle bus. was perfect for brick making, with a shows where you are in relation to the *Public transit routes and schedules are subject to change. Please check with provider. TTC Information: www.ttc.ca or 416-393-4636. Visit www.ebw.evergreen.ca for their shuttle bus schedule. quarry of clay and shale, access to lake. water from Mud Creek, and nearby Walk through the open- Parking: Paid parking available at Evergreen Brick Works. railroads for transportation. In 1989, 2 when brick production ended, the city, air building on your left, called The Pavilions, and out to the Terrace. Food and Washrooms: Available at Evergreen Brick Works. province, conservation authority and private donors purchased the property Until the early-1980s, this large area was an active quarry with a 40 meter Level of Difficulty/Accessibility: The trail varies from gravel, dirt to hard- to protect and restore the lands.
    [Show full text]