DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting #4/13

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meeting #4/13 Executive Committee Meeting #4/13 Chair: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair: Maria Augimeri Members: Ben Cachola Ronald Chopowick Glenn De Baeremaeker Michael Di Biase Jack Heath Colleen Jordan Gloria Lindsay Luby Mike Mattos Jim Tovey Richard Whitehead June 7, 2013 11:00 A.M. FLAG ROOM, MIMICO CRUISING CLUB, 220 HUMBER BAY PARK RD. W., TORONTO, AGENDA EX1. MINUTES OF MEETING #3/13, HELD ON MAY 10, 2013 Minutes Summary Enclosed Herewith on PINK EX2. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES EX3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF EX4. DELEGATIONS EX5. PRESENTATIONS EX6. CORRESPONDENCE 1 EX7. SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION EX7.1 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed Geranium Homes (Ninth Line) Limited CFN 49273 28 EX7.2 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2011-2015 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed 3E Capital Inc. CFN 49284 31 EX7.3 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL Conveyance of Land and a Permanent Easement for the Gore Road Widening , City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, Humber River Watershed CFN 49221 34 EX7.4 SWAN LAKE RESIDENCE RETROFIT AND RENOVATION PROJECT Tender PMO13-04 37 EX8. SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION EX8.1 CANADA GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL GREATER TORONTO CHAPTER Continuation of Partnership Agreement 41 EX8.2 MUD CREEK REACH 5 PROJECT Contract RSD13-053 45 EX9. SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD EX10 ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06 PERMIT APPLICATIONS EX10.1 - EX10.6 ARE MAJOR APPLICATIONS Applications that involved a more complex suite of technical studies to demonstrate consistency with policies; applications that cover a significant geographic area (e.g. subdivisions, stormwater management ponds), extensive modifications to the landscape, major infrastructure projects, emergency works, resolution of violations/after the fact permits, trail construction CITY OF MARKHAM EX10.1 CITY OF MARKHAM To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade, and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere, on Henderson Avenue Forest Park, near John Street, in the City of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by the City of Markham. The purpose is to undertake emergency works to replace 70m of failed 750mm diameter CSP storm pipe. 48 2 CITY OF TORONTO [NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA] EX10.2 CITY OF TORONTO To site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Plan 66M-2380, (Lands to the East of 160 Vanderhoof Avenue), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto. The purpose is to excavate a portion of the valley slope in order to establish a temporary construction access ramp and a temporary shoring system. 50 EX10.3 SCENIC III (ARH) DEVELOPMENTS LTD. To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Lot G, H, Plan 66M-2380, (160 Vanderhoof Avenue), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Scenic III (ARH) Developments Ltd.. The purpose is to construct an 18 storey residential tower with 6 levels of underground parking. 52 CITY OF VAUGHAN EX10.4 CITY OF VAUGHAN To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure on Lot 3, 4, Concession 3, Marita Payne Park, 2 Glen Shields Avenue, in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by the City of Vaughan. The purpose is to undertake emergency works to replace an existing 12.2m long pedestrian bridge with a similar bridge using the existing abutments. The existing bridge has been deemed unsafe for pedestrian use. A Letter of Advice (LOA) will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). 53 CITY OF TORONTO [NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA] EX10.5 CITY OF TORONTO To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade, temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material originating on the site or elsewhere in the Finch Avenue Hydro Corridor from Bayview Avenue to Leslie Street, in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed, as located on property owned by Hydro One Networks Inc. The purpose is to construct a new 3.5m wide asphalt multi-use pathway within the existing Hydro One corridor north of Finch Avenue East, from Yonge Street to Maxome Drive and Conacher Drive to Pineway Boulevard. No in-water works are associated with this project. 55 3 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL EX10.6 SANMIKE CONSTRUCTION LIMITED To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Part Lot 25, EYS Block 24, Plan 65M-3230, (10665 Bayview Avenue), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Sanmike Construction Limited. The purpose is to undertake works within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Rouge River Watershed in order facilitate the construction of a 200mm sanitary forcemain associated with a 67-unit townhouse development in the Town of Richmond Hill. 57 CITY OF MARKHAM EX10.7 59 BURNDENFORD CRESCENT To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure on Lot 13, Plan 65M3380, (59 Burndenford Crescent), in the City of Markham, Rouge River Watershed. The purpose is to recognize the recent construction of a deck structure at the rear of an existing dwelling within a TRCA Regulated Area of the Rouge River Watershed associated with a municipal building permit. 59 CITY OF PICKERING EX10.8 690 FRONT ROAD To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade, temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere and interfere with a wetland on Part Lot 8, Plan 65, (690 Front Road), in the City of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Watershed. The purpose is to construct a replacement dwelling within a Regulated Area associated with the Frenchmans Bay shoreline. 60 CITY OF TORONTO [ETOBICOKE YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA] EX10.9 40 LA RUSH DRIVE To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Lot 7, Plan 5184, (40 La Rush Drive), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed. The purpose is to construct a new two-storey single family detached dwelling and attached garage at 40 La Rush Drive in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke York). The existing dwelling will be demolished. 62 4 CITY OF TORONTO [NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUINCIL AREA] EX10.10 DONALDA CLUB To site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Lot 8, Concession 3 Lot 8, 9, Plan 5112, (12 Bushbury Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Donalda Club. The purpose is to renovate greens and tees within the existing golf course. 64 EX10.11 50 WALLINGFORD ROAD To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Lot 20, Plan 5439, (50 Wallingford Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed. The purpose is to construct a new in-ground swimming pool with associated decking at 50 Wallingford Road in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area). 67 CITY OF TORONTO [SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA] EX10.12 76 CARONDALE CRESCENT To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, change a building or structure so that it alters its use or potential use, increases its size or increases the number of dwelling units, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Lot 27-1 N, Plan M-1281, (76 Carondale Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed. The purpose is to construct a deck and enlarge the existing balcony at the back of the existing dwelling located at 76 Carondale Crescent in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area). 69 CITY OF TORONTO [TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA] EX10.13 300 BAYVIEW AVENUE LIMITED To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, change a building or structure so that it alters its use or potential use, increases its size or increases the number of dwelling units and site grade on Part Lot 1, 2, 3, Plan 108, Part Lot 5, Plan, (300 and 360 Bayview Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Toronto and East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by 300 Bayview Avenue Limited. The purpose is to construct two new concrete vehicular access ramps to connect the Parking Overflow Annex Building municipally know as 300 Bayview Avenue to the existing Audi Dealership Building municipally known as 360 Bayview Avenue. The existing mechanical room within the ground floor area of 300 Bayview Avenue will be converted to additional parking. 71 5 CITY OF VAUGHAN EX10.14 2 GENTILE CIRCLE To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure on , (2 Gentile Circle), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 5 Has Been Updated to Reflect the Specific Additions/Revisions Outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, Dated November, 2017
    DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY This Revised Final Environmental Project Report – Volume 5 has been updated to reflect the specific additions/revisions outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, dated November, 2017. As such, it supersedes the previous Final version dated October, 2017. The report dated October, 2017 (“Report”), which includes its text, tables, figures and appendices) has been prepared by Gannett Fleming Canada ULC (“Gannett Fleming”) and Morrison Hershfield Limited (“Morrison Hershfield”) (“Consultants”) for the exclusive use of Metrolinx. Consultants disclaim any liability or responsibility to any person or party other than Metrolinx for loss, damage, expense, fines, costs or penalties arising from or in connection with the Report or its use or reliance on any information, opinion, advice, conclusion or recommendation contained in it. To the extent permitted by law, Consultants also excludes all implied or statutory warranties and conditions. In preparing the Report, the Consultants have relied in good faith on information provided by third party agencies, individuals and companies as noted in the Report. The Consultants have assumed that this information is factual and accurate and has not independently verified such information except as required by the standard of care. The Consultants accept no responsibility or liability for errors or omissions that are the result of any deficiencies in such information. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are valid as of the date of the Report and are based on the data and information collected by the Consultants during their investigations as set out in the Report. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are based on the conditions encountered by the Consultants at the site(s) at the time of their investigations, supplemented by historical information and data obtained as described in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Has No History!’
    ‘TORONTO HAS NO HISTORY!’ INDIGENEITY, SETTLER COLONIALISM AND HISTORICAL MEMORY IN CANADA’S LARGEST CITY By Victoria Jane Freeman A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto ©Copyright by Victoria Jane Freeman 2010 ABSTRACT ‘TORONTO HAS NO HISTORY!’ ABSTRACT ‘TORONTO HAS NO HISTORY!’ INDIGENEITY, SETTLER COLONIALISM AND HISTORICAL MEMORY IN CANADA’S LARGEST CITY Doctor of Philosophy 2010 Victoria Jane Freeman Graduate Department of History University of Toronto The Indigenous past is largely absent from settler representations of the history of the city of Toronto, Canada. Nineteenth and twentieth century historical chroniclers often downplayed the historic presence of the Mississaugas and their Indigenous predecessors by drawing on doctrines of terra nullius , ignoring the significance of the Toronto Purchase, and changing the city’s foundational story from the establishment of York in 1793 to the incorporation of the City of Toronto in 1834. These chroniclers usually assumed that “real Indians” and urban life were inimical. Often their representations implied that local Indigenous peoples had no significant history and thus the region had little or no history before the arrival of Europeans. Alternatively, narratives of ethical settler indigenization positioned the Indigenous past as the uncivilized starting point in a monological European theory of historical development. i i iii In many civic discourses, the city stood in for the nation as a symbol of its future, and national history stood in for the region’s local history. The national replaced ‘the Indigenous’ in an ideological process that peaked between the 1880s and the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Advertising Expenditure
    ZB7.2 STAFF REPORT To: Board of Management From: Jennifer Tracey, Senior Director Marketing, Communications & Partnerships Subject: 2016 ADVERTISING EXPENDITURE Date: 2016-02-25 Summary: This report outlines the proposed media plan and expenditures related to the 2016 advertising campaign as provided for in the 2016 Operating Budget. The paid advertising will complement the public relations and event strategy to ensure we are reaching our target audiences in the Greater Toronto Area and beyond, and that we are communicating the right messages. Recommendations: It is recommended that the Board approve the following: 1. Expenditures to reimburse Public Inc. for any outsourced production costs related to advertising programs as required for the Toronto Zoo brand, not to exceed $229.0 thousand, plus HST; and, 2. Expenditures with ZenithOptimedia Canada Inc. for media purchases related to the 2015 advertising campaign, not to exceed $956.0 thousand, plus HST. Financial Impact: There are no financial implications related to approval of these recommendations as the related advertising expenditures are included in the Operating Budget for 2016. Background: The Toronto Zoo set out the following objectives which link directly to the goals in the recent Strategic Plan, to drive the Marketing, Communications & Partnerships planning for 2016: 1. Meet or exceed 1.325 million visitors with a positive net revenue; 2. Highlight the Zoo as a ‘must-see’, fun and engaging experience filled with discovery and learning for all ages with a particular focus on the successful conservation and breeding programs including the first giant panda cubs born in Canada; 2015 Advertising Expenditure 2015-02-04 Page 2 of 9 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Peer Review EA Study Design Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport BBTCA
    Imagine the result Peer Review – EA Study Design Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport (BBTCA) Runway Expansion and Introduction of Jet Aircraft Final Report August 2015 BBTCA Peer Review of EA Study Design Report ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Background 1-1 1.2 Current Assignment 1-3 2.0 PEER REVIEW APPROACH 2-1 2.1 Methodology 2-1 3.0 FINDINGS OF PEER REVIEW OF AECOM’S DRAFT STUDY DESIGN REPORT 3-1 3.1 EA Process and Legislation 3-1 3.2 Public Consultation & Stakeholder Engagement 3-1 3.3 Air Quality 3-2 3.4 Public Health 3-5 3.5 Noise 3-6 3.6 Natural Environment 3-10 3.7 Socio-Economic Conditions 3-11 3.8 Land Use & Built Form 3-14 3.9 Marine Physical Conditions and Water Quality 3-15 3.10 Transportation 3-15 3.11 Archaeology & Cultural Heritage 3-18 4.0 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS 4-1 APPENDIX A Presentation Given to the Working Group (22 June 2015) B Presentation of Draft Phase I Peer Review Report Results (13 July 2015) i BBTCA Peer Review of EA Study Design Report ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AERMOD Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System ARCADIS ARCADIS Canada Inc. BBTCA Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport CALPUFF Meteorological and Air Quality Monitoring System CCG Canadian Coast Guard CEAA Canadian Environmental Assessment Act CO Carbon Monoxide COPA Canadian Owners and Pilots Association dBA Decibel Values of Sounds EA Environmental Assessment EC Environment Canada GBE Government Business Enterprise GWC Greater Waterfront Coalition HEAT Habitat and Environmental Assessment Tool INM Integrated Noise Model Ldn Day-Night
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Field Naturalists 20 College St., Unit 4 Toronto, Ont
    TORONTO FIELD NATURALIST Number 422 October 1991 ✓. · -...___~ ~-::;:~=---~~ ..;~-~~-----· .... ~~✓w,~- Inside Amphibians & reptiles 8 Plants 5,14,17,2J,24,25 Birds 1,6,7,9,24,26-27 Reading 9- 10 Coming events 29 TFN - meetings 2 Don watershed 18-22,24 newsletter submissions 15 Invertebrates 6,13,15,23,25 outings 2,3-5 Issues 6,11-15,16,17,26-27 Weather 28 TFN 422 - 2 TFN MEETINGS Monday, October 7 - THE GEOLOGY OF WASTE: THE GARBAGE CRISIS IN ONTAR I O a t 8 pm an illustrated lecture by Dr. Nick Eyles from Scarborough College of the University of Toronto 155 College St. Dr. Eyles has done extensive research on the Scarborough bluffs and the Don Valley Brick Yard. He is an expert on ground water 6th floor auditorium -- a topic which we should all know roore about. It is only by understanding roore about the irovernent of water underground that we can avoid polluting our drinking water supplies when we locate garbage dumps in unsuitable places. Come and bring your friends with you to this ~rtant meeting. - from 7 IXl1 to 8 IXl1 TFN holds a social hour just outside the lecture auditorium - memberships and publications are for sale - a display of the art of Jean McGill Next Meeting: Monday, November 4, 1991 FOR ENJO YMENT OF TFN OUTINGS, REMEMBER THE FOLLOWING: free camera TTC RIDE GUIDE thermos or flask Metro map notebook &pen snack - Bring your family ~ keys and/or friends NO pets money TTC fare TO HELP PR OTECT THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, CONTACT THE FOLL OWING: air or wa ter pollution complaints: 424-3000 debris in valleys: 661-6600 TFN 422 - 3 TFNOUTINGS October Wednesday BES'IVIEW - nature walk East Don, North York Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • TRIPLE FLAG PRECIOUS METALS CORP. US$250,000,010 19,230,770 Common Shares
    No securities regulatory authority has expressed an opinion about these securities and it is an offence to claim otherwise. This prospectus constitutes a public offering of these securities only in those jurisdictions where they may be lawfully offered for sale and therein only by persons permitted to sell such securities. These securities have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘U.S. Securities Act’’), or the securities laws of any state of the United States (as such term is defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act) and may not be offered, sold or delivered, directly or indirectly, in the United States, except pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy any of these securities in the United States. See ‘‘Plan of Distribution’’. SUPPLEMENTED PREP PROSPECTUS Initial Public Offering May 19, 2021 4NOV201908140987 TRIPLE FLAG PRECIOUS METALS CORP. US$250,000,010 19,230,770 Common Shares This prospectus qualifies the distribution in each of the provinces and territories of Canada of an aggregate of 19,230,770 common shares of Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’). The common shares are being offered in U.S. dollars, at a price of US$13.00 per common share, for gross proceeds of approximately US$250,000,000. We will use the net proceeds from this offering for the repayment of existing indebtedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaches Plan Plan Decemberjanuary 2009 2008 Marie Curtis Park  Message from the Mayor
    ROUGE · BLUFFER’S PARK · BALMY – KEW · WOODBINE · greatbeaches... great city, CHERRY · WARD’S ISLAND · TORONTO BEACHES PLAN TORONTO BEACHES PLAN CENTRE ISLAND · GIBRALTAR POINT · HANLAN’S POINT December January · SUNNYSIDE · 2009 EAST 2008 MARIE CURTIS PARK MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR Revitalizing Toronto’s waterfront is a priority for all Torontonians. Ensuring that our beaches are clean and accessible is essential to making that revitalization happen. As places to play and enjoy nature, they contribute to and enhance the quality of life in Toronto. Because of the tremendous importance of beaches, it’s not surprising that Toronto is so focused on creating great public spaces along the waterfront and making our beaches more swimmable. As Founding Chair of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative, I know that communities within this region are taking steps to improve their beaches. As Canada’s biggest city, we must lead by example. I’m proud that Toronto was the first community in Canada to certify its swimming beaches under the international Blue Flag program. The Blue Flag has now been raised at six of our beaches. This is a great start, but we shouldn’t be satisfied until all of our beaches are certified – and until every beach is open for swimming every day during the summer. We’ve made great progress over the past five years in improving Toronto’s beaches. The Toronto Beaches Plan lays out the actions needed to make our beaches cleaner, safer, more usable, more accessible and greener. It’s a broad agenda, ranging from water quality to amenities to programming.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Loops Guide-Explore Etobicoke
    EXPLORE ETOBICOKEEXPLORE Explore Etobicoke Art, History and Nature Cultural Loops Guide Guide Loops Cultural Self-Guided Tours cultural loops Guide loops cultural Contents About Cultural Hotspot 1 About this Cultural Loops Guide 1 Tips for Exploring the Hotspot 3 Councillor’s Message 4 LOOP 1 Flora and Fauna in Mimico 7 Art Along Lake Shore 23 Discovering Lakeshore Grounds 33 LOOP 2 Where Arts and Nature Meet 45 Islington Village: History in Art 55 Getting to Know Mimico Creek 75 Down the Humber River 83 LOOP 3 North Etobicoke Through the Years 99 Community Spirit in North Etobicoke 109 Nature Along the West Humber 117 Wildlife Activity 127 HOT Eats 131 References 141 The Cultural Loops Guide is produced by City of Toronto Arts & Culture Services, Economic Development and Culture Division. For more information visit toronto.ca/culturalhotspot Cover art and interior maps: Salini Perera. Cover illustration is an artistic rendering inspired by community, culture and creativity in Etobicoke. about cultural hotspot From May through October, the Cultural Hotstpot initiative shone a spotlight on arts, culture and community in north Etobicoke. The Cultural Hotspot began in 2014 and has rotated annually, highlighting communities beyond downtown and inspiring new ideas about where culture thrives in the city. The Cultural Hotspot: · Celebrates local culture, heritage, creativity, business and community with special events, festivals and art happenings, building community pride · Connects the Hotspot community, promotes new partnerships and shares this exciting area with all of Toronto through community gather- ings, events, outreach and media campaigns · Grows creative capacity in the area with workshops, courses, youth employment and mentorship, and legacy projects like the Cultural Loops Guide Visit toronto.ca/culturalhotspot for details.
    [Show full text]
  • The Toronto Ravines Study: 1977-2017 Long-Term Changes in the Biodiversity and Ecological Integrity of Toronto’S Ravines
    The Toronto Ravines Study: 1977-2017 Long-term Changes in the Biodiversity and Ecological Integrity of Toronto’s Ravines Eric Davies, Anqi Dong, Catherine Berka, Paul Scrivener, Dale Taylor, Sandy M Smith Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto - July 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report would not have come into being without the work of the many individuals who dedicated endless volunteer hours to its realization. Our thanks to: The originators of the 1977 study, our co-authors Paul Scrivener and Dale Taylor, for sticking with the project over the past 40 years, and for getting it going again. Dale and Paul provided the team with a real-life example of ‘citizen science’ in action, and a generational timeline to the past. They made this project an adventure for all of us. Good stewardship of the land is a lifelong affair, and Dale and Paul have exemplified that commitment beyond all expectations. Esther McNeil for walking into the University of Toronto, Faculty of Forestry six years ago and asking: “How can I help save the Toronto ravines?” Esther inspired us to start working in the Toronto ravines, which ultimately led to this project, this report, and a renewed interest in ravine conservation. Catherine Berka for jumping with two feet into this project from day one, and for providing an endless source of positivity, leadership, humour, community outreach, and every day hard work. The project would simply not be what it is today without the heart and soul of our other co-author, Catherine. This project has benefited tremendously from the expertise, cooperation, and guidance of many people, especially in The City of Toronto, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, local nature groups, and countless citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Erosion Risk Management Program Update Toronto And
    June 2, 2020 Sent via email SEE DISTRIBUTION LIST RE: 2020 Erosion Risk Management Program Update Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Board of Directors, at its meeting #3/20, held on April 24, 2020, adopted Resolution #A41/20 as follows: WHEREAS TRCA staff were requested by the Executive Committee at meeting #3/19 to provide more information regarding the positive impact that the Federal Disaster Mitigation & Adaptation Fund will have on TRCA’s plans for erosion mitigation work; IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT this staff report on TRCA’s Erosion Risk Management Program and the positive impacts of Federal Disaster Mitigation & Adaptation Fund and partner contributions be received; AND FURTHER THAT this report be circulated to TRCA’s municipal partners. The report and referenced resolution are attached to this letter and can also be accessed at the TRCA Board of Directors webpage. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Matthew Johnston at 416-661-6600 ext. 5525, [email protected]. Sincerely, Alisa Mahrova Clerk and Manager, Policy c: John MacKenzie, Chief Executive Officer, TRCA Moranne McDonnel, Director, Restoration and Infrastructure, TRCA Matthew Johnston, Senior Manager, Erosion Risk Management, TRCA Ashour Rehana, Manager, Capital and Special Projects, TRCA DISTRIBUTION LIST Alexander Harras, Manager, Legislative and Information Services /Deputy Clerk, Town of Ajax Amanda Fusco, Acting Town Clerk, Town of Caledon Christopher Raynor, Regional Clerk, Regional Municipality of York Debbie
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Variance Report for the Twelve Months Ended December
    BU19.6 APPENDIX 5 Capital Dashboard by Program/Agency For the Period ended December 31, 2019 Table of Content Program/Agency Page # Community and Social Summary 2 Children's Services 3 Court Services 6 Economic Development & Culture 8 Seniors Services & Long­Term Care 11 Parks, Forestry & Recreation 13 Shelter, Support & Housing Administration 17 Toronto Employment & Social Services 20 Toronto Paramedic Services 22 Infrastructure and Development Summary 24 City Planning 25 Fire Services 27 Transportation Services 30 Waterfront Revitalization Initiative 35 Corporate Services Summary 38 311 Toronto 39 Facilities & Real Estate 41 Fleet Services 45 Technology Services 48 Finance and Treasury Summary 53 Financial Services 54 Other City Programs 57 Office of the Lobbyist Registrar 58 City Clerk's Office 60 Agencies Summary 63 Exhibition Place 64 TO Live 66 Toronto & Region Conservation Authority 68 Toronto Police Service 71 Toronto Public Health 76 Toronto Public Library 78 Toronto Zoo 81 Toronto Transit Commission 83 Yonge Dundas Square 87 Rate Supported Programs Summary 89 Solid Waste Management 90 Toronto Parking Authority 94 Toronto Water 97 2019 Capital Spending by Program Community and Social Services 2019 Expenditure Alert (Benchmark 2019 Approved YTD Year­End Trending 70% spending Cash Flow % at Year End Program Spending Projection rate) 4M 26.77 1.04 14.48 54.1% ⓎⓎⓎ Q2 22.28 1.64 14.48 65.0% ⓎⓎⓎ Children's Services Q3 22.33 3.05 8.12 36.4% ⓇⓇⓇ Q4 22.33 5.04 5.04 22.6% ⓇⓇⓇ 4M 0.06 0.00 0.06 100.0% ⒼⒼⒼ Q2 0.06 0.01 0.06 100.0% ⒼⒼⒼ
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Terminal A
    Fact Sheet Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Terminal A Restoration Quick Facts Terminal A was designed and built by Toronto Harbour Commission (Toronto Port Authority’s predecessor), with construction completed in 1939. The building served as the airport’s terminal from 1939 until 2010. The Federal Government recognized Terminal A as a national historic building in 1989. The building was moved from its original site to the south side of the airport runway in 2012. In June 2014, the Toronto Port Authority (TPA) announced an agreement in principle to repair, restore and re-open the historic Terminal A building at Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport (BBTCA) as a public space and hub for the general aviation community. Terminal A: Overview Prior to the opening of the new terminal in 2010, Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport’s Terminal A building served as the airport’s primary terminal. From 1939 to 2010, the building’s ground floor was used for passenger and baggage handling while the second floor served as the airport’s administrative space. The Toronto Port Authority has invested significant resources into preserving the historic Terminal A building and its aviation heritage and moving the building to its current site. Recognized as a national historic building in 1989 by the Federal Government, the Terminal A building is a rare, surviving example of early airport terminal construction. It is one of the oldest buildings of its kind in Canada and one of only a few in the world. A similar building to Terminal A at Malton Airport, now Toronto Pearson International Airport, was torn down in the 1960s.
    [Show full text]