Danielle Bermudez
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED Remembering Ethnocide: Social Imaginaries of State Violence A Thesis submitted in satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Humanities by Danielle Elizabeth Bermúdez Committee in charge: Professor Arturo Arias, Committee Chair Professor Anneeth Kaur Hundle Professor Nigel Hatton 2017 Copyright Danielle Elizabeth Bermúdez, 2017 All rights reserved The Thesis of Danielle Elizabeth Bermúdez is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Nigel De Juan Hatton, Ph.D. Anneeth Kaur Hundle, Ph.D. Arturo Arias, Ph.D. Chair University of California, Merced 2017 iii Dedicated to Rafaela del Tránsito Fernández and Julio Barton Hernández iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the dedication of my advisor, Professor Arturo Arias, who provided wonderful mentorship, encouragement, feedback. Many thanks to my committee members, Professors Anneeth Kaur Hundle and Nigel Hatton, who provided me with a strong support system as well as critical comments, suggestions, and conversations to help me advance. Many thanks to Professors who have provided me guidance on this project along the way, including Robin Maria DeLugan, Paul Almeida, and David Torres-Rouff. I would also like to thank Professor Horacio Roque-Ramírez and Ester Trujillo, who both inspired me as an undergraduate in unimaginable ways to pursue graduate school. Lastly, thank you to my family, friends, and loved ones who have supported me in my journey throughout graduate school thus far. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ………………………………………………………………………… iii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………….... v Abstract………………………………………………………………………………. vii Introduction …………………………………………………………………………... 1 Section 1: Historical Context and Social Memory………………...…………………. 5 Nahuat in Cuzcatlán and Coloniality…………………………………………………. 5 Coffee Economy………………………………………………………………………. 7 Presidential Elections of 1931………………………………………………………. 8 Communism Narrative………………………………………………………………. 9 Power and Control…………………………………………………………………. 10 Justifying State-Sponsored Ethnocide………………………………………………. 11 Impact of the Ethnocide……………………………………………………………. 13 Tracing Empire…..…………………………………………………………………. 17 Section 2: Social Imaginaries of State Violence and Ethnocide……………….……. 19 The Life of Roque Dalton: Brief Overview…………………………………………. 19 Roque Dalton and Miguel Mármol…………………………………………………. 20 Chapter 6 of Miguel Mármol, La Matanza of 1932: Brief Overview………………. 21 Chapter 7 of Miguel Mármol, Reasons for the losses of 1932: Brief Overview……. 22 Representation of women in Miguel Mármol………………………………………. 24 Reflections on Miguel Mármol………………………………………………………. 26 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………… 30 Bibliography ………………………………………………………………………….. 32 vi ABSTRACT In January of 1932, the Salvadoran military government systematically killed between 7,000 to 50,000 people, mainly Nahuat Indigenous peoples, in the Western region of the country over a period of three weeks. This tragedy came to be known as “La Matanza”, or “The Killing/The Massacre”. Hegemonic understandings of 1932 often represent three dynamics of the massacre through discourses of: 1) the coffee economy, 2) the Communist narrative, and 3) the Presidential elections of 1931. This thesis considers the following questions: How were Nahuat communities impacted by La Matanza? How do Mármol’s social imaginaries represent the massacre? And, how can social memories of the ethnocide function as forms of testimony to reify and/or confront state violence? To answer these questions, this thesis conducts a brief historical overview of 1932, reflects on interdisciplinary works in memory studies, and analyzes cultural production of La Matanza through Roque Dalton’s renowned book Miguel Marmól: los sucesos de 1932 en El Salvador. I argue that Dalton’s representation of Mármol responds to hegemonic understandings of 1932 by problematizing the aforementioned discourses. Even so, his spoken memories also reified gaps and silences, particularly of the physical and symbolic violences that Indigenous and gendered communities endured during and after the ethnocide. vii INTRODUCTION El Salvador is the smallest and most densely populated country in Central America. Most known for its 12-year civil war, 334,000 Salvadorans entered the United States from 1985-1990. An estimated 25 percent of the population fled from violence during the war, and over 1.6 million Salvadorans now live in the United States (Tilley 2007: 15). El Salvador is informed by histories of colonialism, long-lasting and repressive military regimes that remained in control of the country until the 1980s, as well as continuous foreign military intervention, primarily from the United States, shaping the country’s geopolitical history. Yet the country is also a site of resistance and survival. As El Salvador currently reckons with violences of the past and its intersections with the present, it is important to recognize the power of social memory in bearing witness to these histories. The Salvadoran government has excluded Afro-descendants, ethnic immigrants, and Indigenous peoples from dominant histories. Francisco Andres Escobar’s work “Turbios Hilos de Sangre” describes how El Salvador has, until very recently, attempted to hide from its history of Afrikan slavery (Escobar 1994: 15). Afro-descendants have and continue to be subalternized and racialized in El Salvador through lack of public or institutional recognition in the country. In turn, ethnic immigrants have often been referred to as “Turcos” and “Chinos” in the country (DeLugan 2016: 12). The 2004 Presidential campaigns of Antonio Saca and Shafik Handal in El Salvador shed light on the “not so hidden” ethnic minorities in the country. Both Presidential candidates were Palestinian. Some ethnic immigrants from the 19th and 20th century who are now living in El Salvador include Lebanese, Syrian, Palestinian, Chinese, Jewish, and other populations (DeLugan 2016: 11). The Salvadoran government has also historically not recognized Indigenous communities, including Nahuat, Lenca, Cacaopera-Kakawira, Maya, and more. Afro-descendants, Indigenous communities, and ethnic minorities have different experiences of subalterity through enslavement, genocide, and/or racialization and marginalization from mainstream society. Understanding these subalternized histories is central to understanding gaps and silences in the historiography of the country. Only in 2014, after years of Indigenous advocacy, the Salvadoran Constitution was officially modified (Article 63), to explicitly recognize Indigenous peoples in the country (DeLugan 2016: 14). This Master’s thesis examines a state-sponsored massacre known by most Salvadorans as La Matanza (the killing/massacre) of 1932. In January of 1932, the Salvadoran government systematically killed between 7,000 to 50,000 people, mainly Nahuat men, in the Western Izalco region of the country in less than three weeks (Ching 1998: 14). Scholars, such as Thomas Anderson (1971), may refer to La Matanza as one singular event. However there were multiple state-sponsored massacres and other acts of violence that occurred simultaneously in January of 1932, over a period of several weeks. Virginia Tilley refers to the massacre of 1932 as an ethnocide, due to the mass killings of Indigenous peoples. I will also use the term ethnocide in this thesis in reference to La Matanza of 1932 (Tilley 2005: 76). 1 2 Scholars of La Matanza have traditionally described the historical event from three distinct narratives: (1) the economy (coffee production and trade), (2) politics (the presidential elections of 1931), and (3) ideology (the influence of communism) (Lauria- Santiago and Gould 2004: 120). Gould and Lauria-Santiago call into question the use of these three frameworks of analysis. They argue that these dominant discourses of the ethnocide privilege certain narratives about 1932, and leave out other marginal narratives (Lauria-Santiago and Gould 2004: 20). A more nuanced understanding is needed to understand what La Matanza was truly about. Tilley also argues that scholars of La Matanza often treat the massacres of 1932 in isolation from other political activity in the country (Tilley 2005: 80). DeLugan cites, “It is rarely noted that the 1932 popular uprising was one of a long history of Indigenous uprisings in El Salvador... forty-three Indigenous revolts occurred between 1771 and 1918 in El Salvador” (DeLugan 2012: 34). These gaps and silences memorialize particular histories of La Matanza, while attempting to silence history made by subalternized and racialized communities. Dominant discourses of the ethnocide, such as in the three frameworks mentioned previously, omit the humanity of Nahuat peoples that were brutally massacred in 1932. In 2007, 75 years after La Matanza, the first public commemoration of the massacre occurred in Izalco and Nahuizalco, two sites where massacres took place. Many of the main organizers of the commemoration were Nahuat and Maya women, including Juliana Ama, the niece of Feliciano Ama, a Nahuat leader that was killed by the military government in 1932. “Many community stakeholders gathered in Izalco in 2007, for varying reasons. Some gathered to examine 1932 testimonials as evidence to support a possible legal charge of genocide. Social activists sought recognition for the thousands of Indian remains still buried in mass graves in Western El Salvador. Others saw commemorative