DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1606.05830V4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1606.05830V4 This paper has been accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Robotics. DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2016.2624754 IEEE Explore: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7747236/ Please cite the paper as: C. Cadena and L. Carlone and H. Carrillo and Y. Latif and D. Scaramuzza and J. Neira and I. Reid and J.J. Leonard, “Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Age”, in IEEE Transactions on Robotics 32 (6) pp 1309-1332, 2016 bibtex: @articlefCadena16tro-SLAMfuture, title = fPast, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Ageg, author = fC. Cadena and L. Carlone and H. Carrillo and Y. Latif and D. Scaramuzza and J. Neira and I. Reid and J.J. Leonardg, journal = ffIEEE Transactions on Roboticsgg, year = f2016g, number = f6g, pages = f1309–1332g, volume = f32g g arXiv:1606.05830v4 [cs.RO] 30 Jan 2017 1 Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Age Cesar Cadena, Luca Carlone, Henry Carrillo, Yasir Latif, Davide Scaramuzza, Jose´ Neira, Ian Reid, John J. Leonard Abstract—Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM) I. INTRODUCTION consists in the concurrent construction of a model of the environment (the map), and the estimation of the state of the robot LAM comprises the simultaneous estimation of the state moving within it. The SLAM community has made astonishing S of a robot equipped with on-board sensors, and the con- progress over the last 30 years, enabling large-scale real-world struction of a model (the map) of the environment that the applications, and witnessing a steady transition of this technology to industry. We survey the current state of SLAM and consider sensors are perceiving. In simple instances, the robot state is future directions. We start by presenting what is now the de-facto described by its pose (position and orientation), although other standard formulation for SLAM. We then review related work, quantities may be included in the state, such as robot velocity, covering a broad set of topics including robustness and scalability sensor biases, and calibration parameters. The map, on the in long-term mapping, metric and semantic representations for other hand, is a representation of aspects of interest (e.g., mapping, theoretical performance guarantees, active SLAM and exploration, and other new frontiers. This paper simultaneously position of landmarks, obstacles) describing the environment serves as a position paper and tutorial to those who are users of in which the robot operates. SLAM. By looking at the published research with a critical eye, The need to use a map of the environment is twofold. we delineate open challenges and new research issues, that still First, the map is often required to support other tasks; for deserve careful scientific investigation. The paper also contains the authors’ take on two questions that often animate discussions instance, a map can inform path planning or provide an during robotics conferences: Do robots need SLAM? and Is SLAM intuitive visualization for a human operator. Second, the map solved? allows limiting the error committed in estimating the state of Index Terms—Robots, SLAM, Localization, Mapping, Factor the robot. In the absence of a map, dead-reckoning would graphs, Maximum a posteriori estimation, sensing, perception. quickly drift over time; on the other hand, using a map, e.g., a set of distinguishable landmarks, the robot can “reset” its localization error by re-visiting known areas (so-called loop MULTIMEDIA MATERIAL closure). Therefore, SLAM finds applications in all scenarios Additional material for this paper, including an ex- in which a prior map is not available and needs to be built. tended list of references (bibtex) and a table of point- In some robotics applications the location of a set of ers to online datasets for SLAM, can be found at landmarks is known a priori. For instance, a robot operating on https://slam-future.github.io/. a factory floor can be provided with a manually-built map of artificial beacons in the environment. Another example is the C. Cadena is with the Autonomous Systems Lab, ETH Zurich,¨ Switzerland. case in which the robot has access to GPS (the GPS satellites e-mail: [email protected] can be considered as moving beacons at known locations). In L. Carlone is with the Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. e-mail: [email protected] such scenarios, SLAM may not be required if localization can H. Carrillo is with the Escuela de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenier´ıa, Universidad be done reliably with respect to the known landmarks. Sergio Arboleda, Colombia, and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia. e-mail: [email protected] The popularity of the SLAM problem is connected with the Y.Latif and I. Reid are with the School of Computer Science, University emergence of indoor applications of mobile robotics. Indoor of Adelaide, Australia, and the Australian Center for Robotic Vision. e-mail: operation rules out the use of GPS to bound the localization [email protected], [email protected] J. Neira is with the Departamento de Informatica´ e Ingenier´ıa de Sistemas, error; furthermore, SLAM provides an appealing alternative Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain. e-mail: [email protected] to user-built maps, showing that robot operation is possible in D. Scaramuzza is with the Robotics and Perception Group, University of the absence of an ad hoc localization infrastructure. Zurich,¨ Switzerland. e-mail: [email protected] J.J. Leonard is with Marine Robotics Group, Massachusetts Institute of A thorough historical review of the first 20 years of the Technology, USA. e-mail: [email protected] SLAM problem is given by Durrant-Whyte and Bailey in This paper summarizes and extends the outcome of the workshop “The two surveys [7, 69]. These mainly cover what we call the Problem of Mobile Sensors: Setting future goals and indicators of progress for SLAM” [25], held during the Robotics: Science and System (RSS) conference classical age (1986-2004); the classical age saw the intro- (Rome, July 2015). duction of the main probabilistic formulations for SLAM, This work has been partially supported by the following grants: MINECO- including approaches based on Extended Kalman Filters, Rao- FEDER DPI2015-68905-P, Grupo DGA T04-FSE; ARC grants DP130104413, CE140100016 and FL130100102; NCCR Robotics; PUJ 6601; EU-FP7-ICT- Blackwellised Particle Filters, and maximum likelihood esti- Project TRADR 609763, EU-H2020-688652 and SERI-15.0284. mation; moreover, it delineated the basic challenges connected 2 TABLE I: Surveying the surveys and tutorials to efficiency and robust data association. Two other excellent references describing the three main SLAM formulations Year Topic Reference Probabilistic approaches of the classical age are the book of Thrun, Burgard, and 2006 Durrant-Whyte and Bailey [7, 69] et al. and data association Fox [240] and the chapter of Stachniss [234, Ch. 46]. 2008 Filtering approaches Aulinas et al. [6] The subsequent period is what we call the algorithmic-analysis 2011 SLAM back-end Grisetti et al. [97] Observability, consistency age (2004-2015), and is partially covered by Dissanayake et 2011 Dissanayake et al. [64] al. in [64]. The algorithmic analysis period saw the study and convergence 2012 Visual odometry Scaramuzza and Fraundofer [85, 218] of fundamental properties of SLAM, including observability, 2016 Multi robot SLAM Saeedi et al. [216] convergence, and consistency. In this period, the key role of 2016 Visual place recognition Lowry et al. [160] SLAM in the Handbook sparsity towards efficient SLAM solvers was also understood, 2016 Stachniss et al. [234, Ch. 46] of Robotics and the main open-source SLAM libraries were developed. 2016 Theoretical aspects Huang and Dissanayake [109] We review the main SLAM surveys to date in Table I, observing that most recent surveys only cover specific aspects study of sensor fusion under more challenging setups (i.e., no or sub-fields of SLAM. The popularity of SLAM in the last 30 GPS, low quality sensors) than previously considered in other years is not surprising if one thinks about the manifold aspects literature (e.g., inertial navigation in aerospace engineering). that SLAM involves. At the lower level (called the front-end The second answer regards the true topology of the envi- in Section II) SLAM naturally intersects other research fields ronment. A robot performing odometry and neglecting loop such as computer vision and signal processing; at the higher closures interprets the world as an “infinite corridor” (Fig. 1- level (that we later call the back-end), SLAM is an appealing left) in which the robot keeps exploring new areas indefinitely. mix of geometry, graph theory, optimization, and probabilistic A loop closure event informs the robot that this “corridor” estimation. Finally, a SLAM expert has to deal with practical keeps intersecting itself (Fig. 1-right). The advantage of loop aspects ranging from sensor calibration to system integration. closure now becomes clear: by finding loop closures, the The present paper gives a broad overview of the current state robot understands the real topology of the environment, and of SLAM, and offers the perspective of part of the community is able to find shortcuts between locations (e.g., point B on the open problems and future directions for the SLAM and C in the map). Therefore, if getting the right topology research. Our main focus is on metric and semantic SLAM, of the environment is one of the merits of SLAM, why and we refer the reader to the recent survey by Lowry et not simply drop the metric information and just do place al. [160], which provides a comprehensive review of vision- recognition? The answer is simple: the metric information based place recognition and topological SLAM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Robotics Laboratory List
    Robotics List (ロボット技術関連コースのある大学） Robotics List by University Degree sought English Undergraduate / Graduate Admissions Office No. University Department Professional Keywords Application Deadline Degree in Lab links Schools / Institutes or others Website Bachelor Master’s Doctoral English Admissions Master's English Graduate School of Science and Department of Mechanical http://www.se.chiba- Robotics, Dexterous Doctoral：June and December ○ http://www.em.eng.chiba- 1 Chiba University ○ ○ ○ Engineering Engineering u.jp/en/ Manipulation, Visual Recognition Master's：June (Doctoral only) u.jp/~namiki/index-e.html Laboratory Innovative Therapeutic Engineering directed by Prof. Graduate School of Science and Department of Medical http://www.tms.chiba- Doctoral：June and December ○ 1 Chiba University ○ ○ Surgical Robotics ○ Ryoichi Nakamura Engineering Engineering u.jp/english/index.html Master's：June (Doctoral only) http://www.cfme.chiba- u.jp/~nakamura/ Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Micro Sensors, Micro Micro System Laboratory (Dohi http://global.chuo- Graduate School of Science and Coil, Magnetic Resonance ○ ○ Lab.) 2 Chuo University Precision Mechanics u.ac.jp/english/admissio ○ ○ October Engineering Imaging, Blood Pressure (Doctoral only) (Doctoral only) http://www.msl.mech.chuo-u.ac.jp/ ns/ Measurement, Arterial Tonometry (Japanese only) Method Assistive Robotics, Human-Robot Communication, Human-Robot Human-Systems Laboratory http://global.chuo- Graduate School of Science and Collaboration, Ambient ○ http://www.mech.chuo- 2 Chuo University
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Control of a Large Modular Robot Hexapod
    Design and Control of a Large Modular Robot Hexapod Matt Martone CMU-RI-TR-19-79 November 22, 2019 The Robotics Institute School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA Thesis Committee: Howie Choset, chair Matt Travers Aaron Johnson Julian Whitman Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Robotics. Copyright © 2019 Matt Martone. All rights reserved. To all my mentors: past and future iv Abstract Legged robotic systems have made great strides in recent years, but unlike wheeled robots, limbed locomotion does not scale well. Long legs demand huge torques, driving up actuator size and onboard battery mass. This relationship results in massive structures that lack the safety, portabil- ity, and controllability of their smaller limbed counterparts. Innovative transmission design paired with unconventional controller paradigms are the keys to breaking this trend. The Titan 6 project endeavors to build a set of self-sufficient modular joints unified by a novel control architecture to create a spiderlike robot with two-meter legs that is robust, field- repairable, and an order of magnitude lighter than similarly sized systems. This thesis explores how we transformed desired behaviors into a set of workable design constraints, discusses our prototypes in the context of the project and the field, describes how our controller leverages compliance to improve stability, and delves into the electromechanical designs for these modular actuators that enable Titan 6 to be both light and strong. v vi Acknowledgments This work was made possible by a huge group of people who taught and supported me throughout my graduate studies and my time at Carnegie Mellon as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Why Mapping?
    Mapping Why Mapping? Learning maps is one of the fundamental problems in mobile robotics Maps allow robots to efficiently carry out their tasks, allow localization … Successful robot systems rely on maps for localization, path planning, activity planning etc. The General Problem of Mapping What does the environment look like? The General Problem of Mapping The problem of robotic mapping is that of acquiring a spatial model of a robot’s environment Formally, mapping involves, given the sensor data, d {u1, z1,u2 , z2 ,,un , zn} to calculate the most likely map m* arg max P(m | d) m Mapping Challenges A key challenge arises from the measurement errors, which are statistically dependent Errors accumulate over time They affect future measurement Other Challenges of Mapping The high dimensionality of the entities that are being mapped Mapping can be high dimensional Correspondence problem Determine if sensor measurements taken at different points in time correspond to the same physical object in the world Environment changes over time Slower changes: trees in different seasons Faster changes: people walking by Robots must choose their way during mapping Robotic exploration problem Factors that Influence Mapping Size: the larger the environment, the more difficult Perceptual ambiguity the more frequent different places look alike, the more difficult Cycles cycles make robots return via different paths, the accumulated odometric error can be huge The following discussion assumes mapping with known poses Mapping vs. Localization Learning maps is a “chicken-and-egg” problem First, there is a localization problem. Errors can be easily accumulated in odometry, making it less certain about where it is Methods exist to correct the error given a perfect map Second, there is a mapping problem.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,337,482 B2 Wood, Jr
    US008337482B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,337,482 B2 Wood, Jr. (45) Date of Patent: *Dec. 25, 2012 (54) SYSTEM FOR PERFUSION MANAGEMENT (56) References Cited (75) Inventor: Lowell L. Wood, Jr., Livermore, CA U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (US) 3,391,697 A 7, 1968 Greatbatch 3,821,469 A 6, 1974 Whetstone et al. (73) Assignee: The Invention Science Fund I, LLC, 3,941,1273,837,339 A 3,9, 19761974 flagAisenb e tal. Bellevue, WA (US) 3,983.474. A 9/1976 Kuipers 4,054,881 A 10, 1977 Raab (*)c Notice:- r Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 4,202,3494,119,900 A 10,5/1980 1978 JonesKremnitz patent is extended or adjusted under 35 4.262.306 A 4, 1981 Renner U.S.C. 154(b) by 1417 days. 4.267,831. A 5/1981 Aguilar This patent is Subject to a terminal dis- 2. A 3.18: R et al. claimer. 4,339.953 A 7, 1982 Iwasaki 4,367,741 A 1/1983 Michaels 4,396,885 A 8, 1983 Constant (21) Appl. No.: 10/827,576 4,403,321 A 9/1983 Kriger 4.418,422 A 11/1983 Richter et al. (22) Filed: Apr. 19, 2004 4,431,005 A 2f1984 McCormick 4,583, 190 A 4, 1986 Sab O O 4,585,652 A 4, 1986 Miller et al. (65) Prior Publication Data 4,628,928 A 12/1986 Lowell 4,638,798 A 1/1987 Shelden et al. US 2005/O234399 A1 Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • New Method for Robotic Systems Architecture
    NEW METHOD FOR ROBOTIC SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE ANALYSIS, MODELING, AND DESIGN By LU LI Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Science Thesis Advisor: Dr. Roger Quinn Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August 2019 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Lu Li candidate for the degree of Master of Science. Committee Chair Dr. Roger Quinn Committee Member Dr. Musa Audu Committee Member Dr. Richard Bachmann Date of Defense July 5, 2019 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. ii Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................ i List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................... iii Copyright page .................................................................................................................................................. iv Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements
    [Show full text]
  • Simultaneous Localization and Mapping in Marine Environments
    Chapter 8 Simultaneous Localization and Mapping in Marine Environments Maurice F. Fallon∗, Hordur Johannsson, Michael Kaess, John Folkesson, Hunter McClelland, Brendan J. Englot, Franz S. Hover and John J. Leonard Abstract Accurate navigation is a fundamental requirement for robotic systems— marine and terrestrial. For an intelligent autonomous system to interact effectively and safely with its environment, it needs to accurately perceive its surroundings. While traditional dead-reckoning filtering can achieve extremely high performance, the localization accuracy decays monotonically with distance traveled. Other ap- proaches (such as external beacons) can help; nonetheless, the typical prerogative is to remain at a safe distance and to avoid engaging with the environment. In this chapter we discuss alternative approaches which utilize onboard sensors so that the robot can estimate the location of sensed objects and use these observations to improve its own navigation as well its perception of the environment. This approach allows for meaningful interaction and autonomy. Three motivating autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) applications are outlined herein. The first fuses external range sensing with relative sonar measurements. The second application localizes relative to a prior map so as to revisit a specific feature, while the third builds an accurate model of an underwater structure which is consistent and complete. In particular we demonstrate that each approach can be abstracted to a core problem of incremental estimation within a sparse graph of the AUV’s trajectory and the locations of features of interest which can be updated and optimized in real time on board the AUV. Maurice F. Fallon · Hordur Johannsson · Michael Kaess · John Folkesson · Hunter McClelland · Brendan J.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2012)
    2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2012) St. Paul, Minnesota, USA 14 – 18 May 2012 Pages 1-798 IEEE Catalog Number: CFP12RAA-PRT ISBN: 978-1-4673-1403-9 1/7 Content List of 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Technical Program for Tuesday May 15, 2012 TuA01 Meeting Room 1 (Mini-sota) Estimation and Control for UAVs (Regular Session) Chair: Spletzer, John Lehigh Univ. Co-Chair: Robuffo Giordano, Paolo Max Planck Inst. for Biological Cybernetics 08:30-08:45 TuA01.1 State Estimation for Aggressive Flight in GPS-Denied Environments Using Onboard Sensing, pp. 1-8. Bry, Adam Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Bachrach, Abraham Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Roy, Nicholas Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. 08:45-09:00 TuA01.2 Autonomous Indoor 3D Exploration with a Micro-Aerial Vehicle, pp. 9-15. Shen, Shaojie Univ. of Pennsylvania Michael, Nathan Univ. of Pennsylvania Kumar, Vijay Univ. of Pennsylvania 09:00-09:15 TuA01.3 Wind Field Estimation for Autonomous Dynamic Soaring, pp. 16-22. Langelaan, Jack W. Penn State Univ. Spletzer, John Lehigh Univ. Montella, Corey Lehigh Univ. Grenestedt, Joachim Lehigh Univ. 09:15-09:30 TuA01.4 Decentralized Formation Control with Variable Shapes for Aerial Robots, pp. 23-30. Attachment Turpin, Matthew Univ. of Pennsylvania Michael, Nathan Univ. of Pennsylvania Kumar, Vijay Univ. of Pennsylvania 09:30-09:45 TuA01.5 Versatile Distributed Pose Estimation and Sensor Self-Calibration for an Autonomous MAV, pp. 31-38. Attachment Weiss, Stephan ETH Zurich Achtelik, Markus W. ETH Zurich, Autonomous Systems Lab. Chli, Margarita ETH Zurich Siegwart, Roland ETH Zurich 09:45-10:00 TuA01.6 Probabilistic Velocity Estimation for Autonomous Miniature Airships Using Thermal Air Flow Sensors, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Robotic Mapping
    DISTRIBUTED COLLABORATIVE ROBOTIC MAPPING by DAVID BARNHARD (Under Direction the of Dr. Walter D. Potter) ABSTRACT The utilization of multiple robots to map an unknown environment is a challenging problem within Artificial Intelligence. This thesis first presents previous efforts to develop robotic platforms that have demonstrated incremental progress in coordination for mapping and target acquisition tasks. Next, we present a rewards based method that could increase the coordination ability of multiple robots in a distributed mapping task. The method that is presented is a reinforcement based emergent behavior approach that rewards individual robots for performing desired tasks. It is expected that the use of a reward and taxation system will result in individual robots effectively coordinating their efforts to complete a distributed mapping task. INDEX WORDS: Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Distributed Processing, Collaborative Robotics DISTRIBUTED COLLABORATIVE ROBOTIC MAPPING by DAVID BARNHARD B.A. Cognitive Science, University of Georgia, 2001 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTERS OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2005 © 2005 David Barnhard All Rights Reserved DISTRIBUTED COLLABORATIVE ROBOTIC MAPPING by DAVID BARNHARD Major Professor: Dr. Walter D. Potter Committee: Dr. Khaled Rasheed Dr. Suchendra Bhandarkar Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2005 DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my lovely betrothed, Rachel. Everyday I wake to hope and wonder because of her. She is my strength and happiness every moment that I am alive. She has continually, but gently kept pushing me to get this project done, and I know without her careful insistence this never would have been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • KANYOK, NATHAN J., MS, December 2019 COMPUTER SCIENCE
    KANYOK, NATHAN J., M.S., December 2019 COMPUTER SCIENCE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS MONITORING FOR HUMANS-IN-THE-LOOP OF TELEPRES- ENCE ROBOTIC SYSTEMS (80 pages) Thesis Advisor: Dr. Jong-Hoon Kim Autonomous automobiles are expected to be introduced in increasingly complex increments until the system is able to navigate without human interaction. However, humanity is uncomfortable with relying on algorithms to make security critical decisions, which often have moral dimensions. Many robotic systems keep humans in the decision making loop due to their unsurpassed ability to perceive contextual information in ways we find relevant. It is likely that we will see transportation systems with no direct human supervision necessary, but these systems do not address our worry about moral decisions. Until we are able to embed moral agency in digital systems, human actors will be the only agents capable of making decisions with security-critical and moral components. Additionally, in order for a human to be in the position that we can have confidence in their decision, they must be situationally aware of the environment in which the decision will be made. Virtual reality as a medium can achieve this by allowing a person to be telepresent elsewhere. A telepresence dispatch system for autonomous transportation vehicles is proposed that places emphasis on situational awareness so that humans can properly be in the decision making loop. Pre-trial, in-trial, and post-trial metrics are gathered that emphasize human health and monitor situational awareness through traditional and novel approaches. SITUATIONAL AWARENESS MONITORING FOR HUMANS-IN-THE-LOOP OF TELEPRESENCE ROBOTIC SYSTEMS A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science by Nathan J.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect-Computer Hybrid System for Autonomous Search and Rescue Mission
    Insect-Computer Hybrid System for Autonomous Search and Rescue Mission Hirotaka Sato ( [email protected] ) Nanyang Technological University P. Thanh Tran-Ngoc Nanyang Technological University Le Duc Long Nanyang Technological University Bing Sheng Chong Nanyang Technological University H. Duoc Nguyen Nanyang Technological University V. Than Dung Nanyang Technological University Feng Cao Nanyang Technological University Yao Li Harbin Institute of Technology Kazuki Kai Nanyang Technological University Jia Hui Gan Nanyang Technological University T. Thang Vo-Doan University of Freiburg T. Luan Nguyen University of Leeds Physical Sciences - Article Keywords: Disaster-hit Areas, Power Consumption, Locomotion Computation Load, Obstacle-avoidance System, Navigation Control Algorithm, Human Presence Detection Posted Date: June 12th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-598481/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Insect-Computer Hybrid System for Autonomous Search and Rescue Mission P. Thanh Tran-Ngoc1, D. Long Le1, Bing Sheng Chong1, H. Duoc Nguyen1, V. Than Dung1, Feng Cao1, Yao Li2, Kazuki Kai1, Jia Hui Gan1, T. Thang Vo-Doan3, T. Luan Nguyen4, and Hirotaka Sato1* 1School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University; 50 Nanyang Avenue, 639798, Singapore 2School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen; University Town, Shenzhen, 518055, China 3University of Freiburg; Hauptstrasse. 1, Freiburg, 79104, Germany 4University of Leeds; Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract: There is still a long way to go before artificial mini robots are really used for search and rescue missions in disaster-hit areas due to hindrance in power consumption, computation load of the locomotion, and obstacle-avoidance system.
    [Show full text]
  • Creativity in Humans, Robots, Humbots 23
    T. Lubart, D. Esposito, A. Gubenko, and C. Houssemand, Creativity in Humans, Robots, Humbots 23 Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2021 Theories – Research – Applications Creativity in Humans, Robots, Humbots Todd Lubart1, 2, Dario Esposito1, Alla Gubenko3, and Claude Houssemand3 1 LaPEA, Université de Paris and Univ. Gustav Eiffel, F-92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France 2 HSE University, Moscow, Russia 3 Department of Education and Social Work, Institute for Lifelong Learning and Guidance, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg ABSTRACT This paper examines three ways that robots can inter- KEYWORDS: face with creativity. In particular, social robots which are creation process, human-robot interaction, designed to interact with humans are examined. In the human-robot co-creativity, embodied creativity, first mode, human creativity can be supported by social social robots robots. In a second mode, social robots can be creative agents and humans serve to support robot’s produc- Note: The article was prepared in the framework of a research grant funded by the Ministry of Science and tions. In the third and final mode, there is complemen- Higher Education of the Russian Federation (grant ID: tary action in creative work, which may be collaborative 075-15-2020-928). co-creation or a division of labor in creative projects. Il- lustrative examples are provided and key issues for fur- ther discussion are raised. Article history: Corresponding author at: Received: June 20, 2021 Todd Lubart Received in revised from: July 9, 2021 E-MAIL: [email protected] Accepted: July 9, 2021 ISSN 2354-0036 DOI: 10.2478/ctra-2021-0003 24 Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 8(1) 2021 INtrODUctiON Robots are agents equipped with sensors, actuators and effectors which enable them to move and perform manipulative tasks (Russell & Norvig, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,092,549 B2 Hillis Et Al
    USO08092.549B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,092,549 B2 Hillis et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 10, 2012 (54) CILLATED STENT-LIKE-SYSTEM 4,054,881. A 10/1977 Raab 4,119,900 A 10, 1978 Kremnitz (75) Inventors: E.O O i. CA (US, 4,262,3064,202,349 A 4,5/1980 1981 JonesRenner uriel Y. Snkawa, L1Vermore, 4,314,251 A 2f1982 Raab (US); Clarence T. Tegreene, Bellevue, 4,317,078 A 2/1982 Weed et al. WA (US); Richa Wilson, San Francisco, 4,339.953 A 7, 1982 Iwasaki CA (US); Victoria Y. H. Wood 4,367,741 A 1/1983 Michaels Livermore,s CA (US); Lowell L.s Wood, 4,403,3214,396,885 A 9/19838, 1983 KrigerConstant Jr., Livermore, CA (US) 4.418,422 A 1 1/1983 Richter et al. 4,431,005 A 2f1984 McCormick (73) Assignee: The Invention Science Fund I, LLC, 4,583, 190 A 4, 1986 Sab Bellevue, WA (US) 4,585,652 A 4, 1986 Miller et al. 4,628,928 A 12/1986 Lowell (*)c Notice:- r Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 4,642,7864,638,798 A 2f19871/1987 SheldenHansen et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 4,651,732 A 3, 1987 Frederick U.S.C. 154(b) by 210 days. 4,658,214. A 4, 1987 Petersen 4,714.460 A 12/1987 Calderon (21) Appl. No.: 10/949,186 4,717,381 A 1/1988 Papantonakos 4,733,661 A 3, 1988 Palestrant 1-1.
    [Show full text]