DOCSLIB.ORG

Divine Display Or Secular Science

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Divine Display Or Secular Science Divine Display or Secular Science: Defining Nature at the Natural History Museum in London Author(s): Carla Yanni Source: Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 55, No. 3 (Sep., 1996), pp. 276-299 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Society of Architectural Historians Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/991149 Accessed: 21-08-2016 19:45 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Society of Architectural Historians, University of California Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians This content downloaded from 128.59.106.243 on Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:45:58 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Divine Display or Secular Science Defining Nature at the Natural History Museum in London Owen was the premier reconstructive anatomist in Victorian CARLA YANNI, University of New Mexico England, and he was later known as an opponent of Darwinism. His first job at the British Museum, which at the time held the Conflicting ranging from definitions nature as the unwritten of nature Book of God in to the Victorian age, natural history collections, was to secure government funds for nature as secular science, affected the architectural develop- them, and to persuade Parliament to allow the division of the ment of the Natural History Museum in London. The protago- collection into two parts: antiquities and natural history. Any- nists in its story-scientists, politicians, and architects-agreed thing made by human hands would remain with the British on the cultural worth of museums, but disagreed on their form. Museum in Bloomsbury, thus making a boundary between Alfred Waterhouse, the museum's architect, entered this storm, God-made and man-made objects, to use Victorian terms. This designing a monumental building to respond to impermanent division was derived from natural theology, especially William accounts of natural history. Behind such technical concemrns as Paley's Natural Theology (1802): the purpose of a natural history site selection, lighting, and display techniques lay questions of museum was thus to show the greatness of God in the variety of the deepest concemrn to Victorians: What was nature? And how nature. The kind of objects usually displayed in many of today's could nature best be presented to an array of audiences? anthropology museums---carved masks, textiles, canoes, and This article discusses three issues in the museum's architec- the like-did not promote natural theology and would have tural history: the scope of the displays, the suitability of exhibition been out of place in Owen's proposed museum. architecture, and the appropriateness of ecclesiastical imagery In 1858, more than a hundred scientists (probably encour- in the final building. Beginning in the 1850s, Richard Owen aged by Owen) sent a letter to Benjamin Disraeli, the chancellor (1804-1892), an upper-class conservative natural theologian, of the exchequer, complaining of inadequate space for natural and Thomas H. Huxley (1825-1895), a middle-class secular history at the British Museum. Too many specimens were out of evolutionist of the younger generation, debated the breadth of sight in damp storage areas, and even the collections that were the museum's displays, Owen proposing an encyclopedic mu- on display, like omrnithology, pictured in the Illustrated London seum of the entire imperial collection, while Huxley preferred a News on Easter Monday 1845, were overcrowded [Figure 1]. small didactic museum for the public and a private research Scientists concurred that natural history should be removed center for scientists. Just after the competition, which was held from the British Museum, but the removal led to conflicts over in 1864, the engineer Francis Fowke (1824-1865), whose the possible division of the museum into popular and working design was selected, and architect Robert Kerr (1824-1905), collections, and the sites of these two parts. Owen was eager to whose entry placed second, disagreed about the extent to which improve conditions, raise money, and organize a new museum, exhibition architecture should encroach upon museum design, but first he had to contend with skeptics in the scientific revealing a tension between notions of the museum as show- community, particularly Huxley.3 Unlike many Victorian scien- place and the museum as scientific research center. Finally, we tists, Huxley lacked personal wealth, and at first found it will look at the reception in journals and newspapers of the difficult to eamrn a living, although by the end of his career he museum's architecture, especially the omrnament and the nave- held several important appointments, including that of lecturer like central hall, around the time of its opening day in 1881.1 in natural history at the Royal School of Mines, where he devoted himself to educating working people. In his lectures he THE PROGRAM AND PRELIMINARY PLANS emphasized the value of objective science and freedom of When Richard Owen became Superintendent of Natural thought His- for the daily lives of ordinary citizens. Nicknamed tory at the British Museum in 1856, he was already an "Darwin's authority Bulldog," Huxley debated evolution with Bishop on both natural history and museum design, having Wilberforcesupervised (who had been coached by Owen) in 1860 in Deane the museum at the Royal College of Surgeons in London.2 and Woodward's newly opened Oxford University Museum. 276 JSAH / 55:3, SEPTEMBER 1996 This content downloaded from 128.59.106.243 on Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:45:58 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms A4? ,~ ~~~t V ..j .......# Ilk b- FIGURE 1: Robert Smirke, British Museum, interior, Great Zoology Gallery, Illustroted London News 6 (29 March 1845) Throughout where the naturalists second half could of conveniently the nineteenth compare century, specimens he to promoted living a secularanimals. and In accord progressive with Huxley, view of Darwin science, saw whichstuffing skins made him and arebuilding leader among skeletons the young as crowd-pleasing men who pursued techniques science and as profession proof ofrather "a sort than of gentlemanly vanity in the hobby.4 curators."7 This remark was In a petition probably of directed November to Richard 1858, Huxley Owen, whoand wantedeight like- to reconstruct minded beasts scientists, for a includingunified, large, Charles encyclopedic Darwin, urged museum that thatthe would zoological serve as an ideal model of Creation. collections in the British Museum be divided into two major parts: The scientists' discussion of the site reveals anxiety concern-a study series for scientists near the zoo and a pop- ular series ing administrative power. Scientists opposed inthe move of the South Kensington, the suburb Prince Albert had promoted entire collection to South Kensington, as considered a site afor cultural center for London since 1851, the year it hosted educational the museums and spectacular exhibitions successful like the Great Exhibition.5 As Huxley wrote to John Dalton Crystal Palace, because it signaled their loss of administrative Hooker, director of the botanical gardens at Kew: control. Huxley wanted scientists, not bureaucrats, to control The best thing, I firmly believe, would be for the Economic Zoology and the natural history collection; thus he believed only the popular a set of well selected types to go to Kensington .... [T]o have a grand collection should be moved to South Kensington, the domain scientific zoological and paleontological collection for working purposes of the government-run Department of Science and Art. As he close to the Gardens [the Zoological Gardens in Regent's Park] where wrote to Hooker: "I should be sorry to see the scientific the living beasts are, would be a grand thing.6 collection placed under any auspices as those which govern the Huxley 'Bilers,"'" as he envisionedcalled the Brompton Boilers, in a Cockney the extensive scientific collections, bones and folded accent.8 The Brompton Boilers housed theskins, South Kensington stored in the drawers and cabinets of a facility YANNI: NATURE AND SCIENCE IN LONDON 277 This content downloaded from 128.59.106.243 on Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:45:58 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Museum of decorative and industrial arts, later the Victoria and range for the collection of the various forms of animal life as Great Albert Museum. managed by the Department of Science and Britain. ... Naturalists consequently visit England anticipating to find in Art. Hooker recommended to Huxley that they keep the her capital and in her National Museum the richest and most varied collections near the zoo not only because of the animals, but materials for their comparison and deductions. And they ought to be in a also "to keep out of the K[ensington] Gore people's clutches.1"9 state pre-eminently conducive to the advancement of a philosophical Owen did not originally favor South Kensington, but the grand zoology, and on a scale commensurate with the greatness of the size of his intended museum precluded the purchase of land in nation....'2 costly central London.10 In the next few years, Huxley would lose a major battle to Owen: a single, unified museum, where Since the British Empire's national museum was the only the public and scientists would have equal access to the entire institution in the world that could amass and present such a collection, would be planned for a South Kensington site.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Timeline of Significant Events in the Development of North American Mammalogy
    SpecialSpecial PublicationsPublications MuseumMuseum ofof TexasTexas TechTech UniversityUniversity NumberNumber xx66 21 Novemberxx XXXX 20102017 A Timeline of SignificantTitle Events in the Development of North American Mammalogy Molecular Biology Structural Biology Biochemistry Microbiology Genomics Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Computer Science Statistics Physical Chemistry Information Technology Mathematics David J. Schmidly, Robert D. Bradley, Lisa C. Bradley, and Richard D. Stevens Front cover: This figure depicts a chronological presentation of some of the significant events, technological breakthroughs, and iconic personalities in the history of North American mammalogy. Red lines and arrows depict the chronological flow (i.e., top row – read left to right, middle row – read right to left, and third row – read left to right). See text and tables for expanded interpretation of the importance of each person or event. Top row: The first three panels (from left) are associated with the time period entitled “The Emergence Phase (16th‒18th Centuries)” – Mark Catesby’s 1748 map of Carolina, Florida, and the Bahama Islands, Thomas Jefferson, and Charles Willson Peale; the next two panels represent “The Discovery Phase (19th Century)” – Spencer Fullerton Baird and C. Hart Merriam. Middle row: The first two panels (from right) represent “The Natural History Phase (1901‒1960)” – Joseph Grinnell and E. Raymond Hall; the next three panels (from right) depict “The Theoretical and Technological Phase (1961‒2000)” – illustration of Robert H. MacArthur and Edward O. Wilson’s theory of island biogeography, karyogram depicting g-banded chromosomes, and photograph of electrophoretic mobility of proteins from an allozyme analysis. Bottom row: These four panels (from left) represent the “Big Data Phase (2001‒present)” – chromatogram illustrating a DNA sequence, bioinformatics and computational biology, phylogenetic tree of mammals, and storage banks for a supercomputer.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Stone Isaac Milner and the Physicist John Leslie
    BOOKS & ARTS COMMENT in Wreay, ensured that beyond her immediate locality only specialists would come to know and admire her work. RAYMOND WHITTAKER RAYMOND Panning outwards from this small, largely agricultural com- munity, Uglow uses Losh’s story to create The Pinecone: a vibrant panorama The Story of Sarah Losh, Forgotten of early nineteenth- Romantic Heroine century society that — Antiquarian, extends throughout Architect and the British Isles, across Visionary Europe and even to JENNY UGLOW the deadly passes of Faber/Farrer, Strauss and Giroux: Afghanistan. Uglow 2012/2013. is at ease in the intel- 344 pp./352 pp. lectual environment £20/$28 of the era, which she researched fully for her book The Lunar Men (Faber, 2002). Losh’s family of country landowners pro- vided wealth, stability and an education infused with principles of the Enlighten- ment. Her father, John, and several uncles were experimenters, industrialists, religious nonconformists, political reformers and enthusiastic supporters of scientific, literary, historical and artistic endeavour, like mem- bers of the Lunar Society in Birmingham, UK. John Losh was a knowledgeable collector of Cumbrian fossils and minerals. His family, meanwhile, eagerly consumed the works of geologists James Hutton, Charles Lyell and William Buckland, which revealed ancient worlds teeming with strange life forms. Sarah’s uncle James Losh — a friend of Pinecones, flowers and ammonites adorn the windows of Saint Mary’s church in Wreay, UK. political philosopher William Godwin, husband of the pioneering feminist Mary ARCHITECTURE Wollstonecraft — took the education of his clever niece seriously. She read all the latest books, and met some of the foremost inno- vators of the day, such as the mathematician Life in stone Isaac Milner and the physicist John Leslie.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Transactions, »
    INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS, » S e r ie s A, FOR THE YEAR 1898 (VOL. 191). A. Absorption, Change of, produced by Fluorescence (B urke), 87. Aneroid Barometers, Experiments on.—Elastic After-effect; Secular Change; Influence of Temperature (Chree), 441. B. Bolometer, Surface, Construction of (Petavel), 501. Brilliancy, Intrinsic, Law of Variation of, with Temperature (Petavel), 501. Burke (John). On the Change of Absorption produced by Fluorescence, 87. C. Chree (C.). Experiments on Aneroid Barometers at Kew Observatory, and their Discussion, 441. Correlation and Variation, Influence of Random Selection on (Pearson and Filon), 229. Crystals, Thermal Expansion Coefficients, by an Interference Method (Tutton), 313. D. Differential Equations of the Second Order, &c., Memoir on the Integration of; Characteristic Invariant of (Forsyth), 1. 526 INDEX. E. Electric Filters, Testing Efficiency of; Dielectrifying Power of (Kelvin, Maclean, and Galt), 187. Electricity, Diffusion of, from Carbonic Acid Gas to Air; Communication of, from Electrified Steam to Air (Kelvin, Maclean, and Galt), 187. Electrification of Air by Water Jet, Electrified Needle Points, Electrified Flame, &c., at Different Air-pressures; at Different Electrifying Potentials; Loss of Electrification (Kelvin, Maclean, and Galt), 187. Electrolytic Cells, Construction and Calibration of (Veley and Manley), 365. Emissivity of Platinum in Air and other Gases (Petavel), 501. Equations, Laplace's and other, Some New Solutions of, in Mathematical Physics (Forsyth), 1. Evolution, Mathematical Contributions to Theory o f; Influence of Random Selection on the Differentiation of Local Races (Pearson and Filon), 229. F. Filon (L. N. G.) and Pearson (Karl). Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution.—IV. On the Probable Errors of Frequency Constants and on the Influence of Random Selection on Variation and Correlation, 229.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutes and Rules for the British Museum
    (ft .-3, (*y Of A 8RI A- \ Natural History Museum Library STATUTES AND RULES BRITISH MUSEUM STATUTES AND RULES FOR THE BRITISH MUSEUM MADE BY THE TRUSTEES In Pursuance of the Act of Incorporation 26 George II., Cap. 22, § xv. r 10th Decembei , 1898. PRINTED BY ORDER OE THE TRUSTEES LONDON : MDCCCXCYIII. PRINTED BY WOODFALL AND KINDER, LONG ACRE LONDON TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I. PAGE Meetings, Functions, and Privileges of the Trustees . 7 CHAPTER II. The Director and Principal Librarian . .10 Duties as Secretary and Accountant . .12 The Director of the Natural History Departments . 14 CHAPTER III. Subordinate Officers : Keepers and Assistant Keepers 15 Superintendent of the Reading Room . .17 Assistants . 17 Chief Messengers . .18 Attendance of Officers at Meetings, etc. -19 CHAPTER IV. Admission to the British Museum : Reading Room 20 Use of the Collections 21 6 CHAPTER V, Security of the Museum : Precautions against Fire, etc. APPENDIX. Succession of Trustees and Officers . Succession of Officers in Departments 7 STATUTES AND RULES. CHAPTER I. Of the Meetings, Functions, and Privileges of the Trustees. 1. General Meetings of the Trustees shall chap. r. be held four times in the year ; on the second Meetings. Saturday in May and December at the Museum (Bloomsbury) and on the fourth Saturday in February and July at the Museum (Natural History). 2. Special General Meetings shall be sum- moned by the Director and Principal Librarian (hereinafter called the Director), upon receiving notice in writing to that effect signed by two Trustees. 3. There shall be a Standing Committee, standing . • Committee. r 1 1 t-» • 1 t> 1 consisting 01 the three Principal 1 rustees, the Trustee appointed by the Crown, and sixteen other Trustees to be annually appointed at the General Meeting held on the second Saturday in May.
    [Show full text]
  • William Morris and the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings: Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Historic Preservation in Europe
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 6-2005 William Morris and the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings: Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Historic Preservation in Europe Andrea Yount Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the European History Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Yount, Andrea, "William Morris and the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings: Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Historic Preservation in Europe" (2005). Dissertations. 1079. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/1079 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WILLIAM MORRIS AND THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS: NINETEENTH AND TWENTIETH CENTURY IDSTORIC PRESERVATION IN EUROPE by Andrea Yount A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Dale P6rter, Adviser Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 2005 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. ® UMI Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3183594 Copyright 2005 by Yount, Andrea Elizabeth All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • In South Kensington, C. 1850-1900
    JEWELS OF THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM: GENDERED AESTHETICS IN SOUTH KENSINGTON, C. 1850-1900 PANDORA KATHLEEN CRUISE SYPEREK PH.D. HISTORY OF ART UCL 2 I, PANDORA KATHLEEN CRUISE SYPEREK confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. ______________________________________________ 3 ABSTRACT Several collections of brilliant objects were put on display following the opening of the British Museum (Natural History) in South Kensington in 1881. These objects resemble jewels both in their exquisite lustre and in their hybrid status between nature and culture, science and art. This thesis asks how these jewel-like hybrids – including shiny preserved beetles, iridescent taxidermised hummingbirds, translucent glass jellyfish as well as crystals and minerals themselves – functioned outside of normative gender expectations of Victorian museums and scientific culture. Such displays’ dazzling spectacles refract the linear expectations of earlier natural history taxonomies and confound the narrative of evolutionary habitat dioramas. As such, they challenge the hierarchies underlying both orders and their implications for gender, race and class. Objects on display are compared with relevant cultural phenomena including museum architecture, natural history illustration, literature, commercial display, decorative art and dress, and evaluated in light of issues such as transgressive animal sexualities, the performativity of objects, technologies of visualisation and contemporary aesthetic and evolutionary theory. Feminist theory in the history of science and new materialist philosophy by Donna Haraway, Elizabeth Grosz, Karen Barad and Rosi Braidotti inform analysis into how objects on display complicate nature/culture binaries in the museum of natural history.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Transactions (A)
    INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS (A) FOR THE YEAR 1889. A. A bney (W. de W.). Total Eclipse of the San observed at Caroline Island, on 6th May, 1883, 119. A bney (W. de W.) and T horpe (T. E.). On the Determination of the Photometric Intensity of the Coronal Light during the Solar Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 363. Alcohol, a study of the thermal properties of propyl, 137 (see R amsay and Y oung). Archer (R. H.). Observations made by Newcomb’s Method on the Visibility of Extension of the Coronal Streamers at Hog Island, Grenada, Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 382. Atomic weight of gold, revision of the, 395 (see Mallet). B. B oys (C. V.). The Radio-Micrometer, 159. B ryan (G. H.). The Waves on a Rotating Liquid Spheroid of Finite Ellipticity, 187. C. Conroy (Sir J.). Some Observations on the Amount of Light Reflected and Transmitted by Certain 'Kinds of Glass, 245. Corona, on the photographs of the, obtained at Prickly Point and Carriacou Island, total solar eclipse, August 29, 1886, 347 (see W esley). Coronal light, on the determination of the, during the solar eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 363 (see Abney and Thorpe). Coronal streamers, observations made by Newcomb’s Method on the Visibility of, Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 382 (see A rcher). Cosmogony, on the mechanical conditions of a swarm of meteorites, and on theories of, 1 (see Darwin). Currents induced in a spherical conductor by variation of an external magnetic potential, 513 (see Lamb). 520 INDEX.
    [Show full text]
  • History Refuge Assurance Building Manchester
    History Refuge Assurance Building Manchester Sometimes heterotypic Ian deputizing her archness deep, but lang Lazlo cross-fertilized religiously or replants incontinently. Conceptional Sterne subserved very abloom while Meryl remains serotinal and Paphian. Chevy recalesced unclearly. By the accessible, it all of tours taking notice of purchase The Refuge Assurance Building designed by Alfred Waterhouse was completed in 195. Kimpton Clocktower Hotel is diamond a 10-minute walk from Manchester. Scottish valley and has four wheelchair accessible bedrooms. The technology landscape is changing, see how you can take advantage of the latest technologies and engage with us. Review the Principal Manchester MiS Magazine Daily. Please try again later shortened it was another masterpiece from manchester history museum, building formerly refuge assurance company registered in. The carpet could do with renewing, but no complaints. These cookies are strictly necessary or provide oversight with services available on our website and discriminate use fee of its features. Your email address will buck be published. York has had many purposes and was built originally as Bootham Grange, a Regency townhouse. Once your ip address will stop for shopping and buildings past with history. Promotion code is invalid. The bar features eclectic furniture, including reclaimed vintage, whilst the restaurant has that more uniform design. Palace Hotel formerly Refuge Assurance Building. It is also very reasonably priced considering! Last but not least, The Refuge plays home to the Den. How would I feel if I received this? Thank you use third party and buildings. Refuge by Volta certainly stands out. The colours used in research the upholstery and the paintwork subtly pick out colours from all heritage tiling, and nasty effort has gold made me create varied heights and types of seating arrangement to bathe different groups and dining options.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Marine Mammals
    Romero, A. 2009. The Biology of Marine Mammals. The Biology of Marine Mammals Aldemaro Romero, Ph.D. Arkansas State University Jonesboro, AR 2009 2 INTRODUCTION Dear students, 3 Chapter 1 Introduction to Marine Mammals 1.1. Overture Humans have always been fascinated with marine mammals. These creatures have been the basis of mythical tales since Antiquity. For centuries naturalists classified them as fish. Today they are symbols of the environmental movement as well as the source of heated controversies: whether we are dealing with the clubbing pub seals in the Arctic or whaling by industrialized nations, marine mammals continue to be a hot issue in science, politics, economics, and ethics. But if we want to better understand these issues, we need to learn more about marine mammal biology. The problem is that, despite increased research efforts, only in the last two decades we have made significant progress in learning about these creatures. And yet, that knowledge is largely limited to a handful of species because they are either relatively easy to observe in nature or because they can be studied in captivity. Still, because of television documentaries, ‘coffee-table’ books, displays in many aquaria around the world, and a growing whale and dolphin watching industry, people believe that they have a certain familiarity with many species of marine mammals (for more on the relationship between humans and marine mammals such as whales, see Ellis 1991, Forestell 2002). As late as 2002, a new species of beaked whale was being reported (Delbout et al. 2002), in 2003 a new species of baleen whale was described (Wada et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter (PDF)
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. (B.) FOR THE YEAR MDCCCLXXXVII. VOL. 178. LONDON: PRINTED BY HARRISON AND SONS, ST. MARTIN’S LANE, W C., printers in Ordinary to Her Majesty. MDCCCLXXXVIII. ADVERTISEMENT. The Committee appointed by the Royal Society to direct the publication of the Philosophical Transactions take this opportunity to acquaint the public that it fully appears, as well from the Council-books and Journals of the Society as from repeated declarations which have been made in several former , that the printing of them was always, from time to time, the single act of the respective Secretaries till the Forty-seventh Volume; the Society, as a Body, never interesting themselves any further in their publication than by occasionally recommending the revival of them to some of their Secretaries, when, from the particular circumstances of their affairs, the Transactions had happened for any length of time to be intermitted. And this seems principally to have been done with a view to satisfy the public that their usual meetings were then continued, for the improvement of knowledge and benefit of mankind : the great ends of their first institution by the Boyal Charters, and which they have ever since steadily pursued. But the Society being of late years greatly enlarged, and their communications more numerous, it was thought advisable that a Committee of their members should be appointed to reconsider the papers read before them, and select out of them such as. they should judge most proper for publication in the future Transactions; which was accordingly done upon the 26th of March, 1752.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool University Urban Design Framework Part 3.Pdf
    University of Liverpool: UDF 2:5 - The Townscape Context In order to assess the quality of the townscape around the University we have undertaken an audit of the quality of buildings in the area. Inherent townscape quality: Blighting impact 1/5 Inherent townscape quality: Negative impact 2/5 Inherent townscape quality: Neutral contribution 3/5 Inherent townscape quality: Positive contribution 4/5 Inherent townscape quality: Maximum contribution 5/5 We have conducted a detailed, block by block The survey is not so much designed as a This core barely connects to the positive Other fragments of quality townscape are located much of the area around Lime Street Station; visual assessment of townscape quality across judgement on each property, as a means of townscape of the Bold Street and Ropewalks at St. Andrew’s Gardens, and on the very edge and the study area. Each block, and in many cases building up a well-grounded picture of patterns of area to the west, which includes Renshaw Street, of Kensington where the Bridewell and Sacred the majority of the University of Liverpool individual buildings within them, has been townscape quality around the University Campus. Ranelagh Place and Lime Street. Heart Church are outposts of the intact Victorian campus. rated on a scale between 1 and 5, to provide neighbourhood around Kensington Fields. a consistent measure of their architecture’s Differentiating the buildings and blocks that A spur of good townscape reaches along London The townscape plan on the opposite page underlying effect on the overall
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Grounds Doc 201210:00.Qxd
    The Natural History Museum : The Evolution of the Grounds and their Significance 37 Conclusions on Historical Development 38 The Natural History Museum : The Evolution of the Grounds and their Significance 7.1 The very existence of the grounds flowed 7.5 The Museum extended permissive access from the refusal of the Commissioner of to local residents who used it occasionally. Works at the time (Acton Smee Ayrton) to finance the Museum so that it had an adequate capacity. A bigger building was projected. The smaller one funded by the 7.6 Notwithstanding Waterhouse’s public Office of Works occupied less of the site, statement to the contrary, the landscape and so the grounds left over had to be appears to have been an expedient design. landscaped. It simply reproduced the prevailing line of the building alongside the prevailing line of the road, and at the corners near the pavilions generated a simple, square 7.2 A large portion of the site was therefore left pattern from the intersection of the unoccupied which faut de mieux became tramline-like paths. public gardens, though it was always hoped that funds would be forthcoming and they would eventually be built on. It is not right, therefore, to say that Waterhouse intended 7.7 The landscape scheme was, like the his building to sit within a landscaped building, intended to be strictly setting. His masters refused to pay for a symmetrical, but the introduction of a larger building, leaving him with the task of picturesque landscape layout in the late doing something with the grounds.
    [Show full text]