Middlebrow Cinema

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Middlebrow Cinema 1 HOLLYWOOD MIDDLEBROW A dialectical approach to 1940s cinema Chris Cagle Is classical Hollywood primarily a middlebrow cultural form? In his influential taxonomy of high, middle and lowbrow culture for Harper’s Magazine in 1949, Russell Lynes remarks, ‘If the lowbrow reads the comics, the highbrow understands; he is a frequent connoisseur of the comics himself. But if he likes grade-B double features, the highbrow blames that on the corrupting influence of the middlebrow moneybags of Hollywood’ (1949, 25). Tongue-in-cheek, Lynes is nonetheless observing that in comparison to lowbrow culture, even the lower-status genre pictures are too respectable and too sure in their morality to qualify as working- class culture. As Joan Shelley Rubin notes, Lynes’ article fixed the terminology in the popular usage in the United States (1992, xiv). However influential his analy- sis, though, other critics have not shared his assessment of Hollywood. Dwight MacDonald offhandedly states in his famous 1960 essay on ‘Masscult and Midcult’ that in contrast to the middlebrow ‘Midcult’, ‘the enormous output of such new media as the radio, television and the movies is almost entirely Masscult’ (1960, 204). Lynes and MacDonald were two of the most prominent post-war American writers to try to theorize middlebrow culture in response to the widespread emergence of a middlebrow culture over the post-war years. As a later commentator, John Guillory, writes, middlebrow culture is ‘the ambivalent mediation of high culture within the field of the mass cultural’ (1995, 87). As a major mass medium and entertainment form in the first part of the twentieth century, Hollywood cinema undoubtedly provoked a crisis for the status of high culture, but Lynes and MacDonald have opposing appraisals over whether Hollywood represented middlebrow or mass culture. Film Studies has replicated this divide. The prevailing view has seen middlebrow films as occasional exceptions to the mainstay of Hollywood’s popular cinema. Hollywood in its studio years developed a storytelling language that matched the exigencies of industrial production with mass taste. Thus genre played a prominent 16 Chris Cagle role in these years, and even ‘serious’ filmmaking activated the narrative formulas of ‘lower’ popular genres. Andrew Sarris used his categories of ‘less than meets the eye’ and ‘strained seriousness’ as foils for cinema that is properly art (1996, 11). Sarris valued the auteurs who managed to give a vision to lower genres like action films, westerns and thrillers, and was suspicious of prestige or literary material. ‘[W]ho except Huston himself is to blame’, he wrote, ‘for the middle-brow banal- ity of Freud, a personal project with built-in compromises for the “mass” audience’ (1996, 156). Even if film scholars now (usually) have a different stance towards evaluation than Sarris, they often locate the ‘middlebrow’ within films that have a particular aspiration for seriousness: Tom Brown (2013, 119) mentions the biopic, the historical film and the social problem film as privileged middlebrow genres, to which one could add adaptations of canonical novels and plays in genres like the costume drama and heritage film. Whether occurring in particular genres or individual films, the middlebrow would in these models work through a cultural difference from the mainstay of popular cinema. This view of middlebrow films as exceptions to Hollywood’s genre film machine may be so familiar that it can be hard to recognize another, seemingly opposite, view that holds Hollywood in general to be a middlebrow product. Historians of American cinema in the transitional period have charted how a shift from the mostly working-class nickelodeons to the movie palace involved not only the development of classical film language as a storytelling rule-system, but also the hegemony of an absorbed middle-class spectatorship (Uricchio and Pearson 1993). In this account, a film like Birth of a Nation (Griffith 1915) was important not only for popularizing proto-classical storytelling, but also for upgrading the cultural status of cinema and the exhibition space itself. This bourgeoisification of cinema serves as the backbone of what Miriam Hansen formulated as an early cinema-late cinema thesis: both early cinema and postclassical cinema have offered robust public spheres of contestation, whereas classical cinema was a long but finite period of a bourgeois culture grafted onto a popular one (1993, 210). Even accepting the elasticity of the term ‘middle- class’ in American usage, the historical account shows that cinema by the 1920s had consolidated its appeal as a petit-bourgeois entertainment form. In short, one view sees middlebrow as a limited variation of Hollywood’s formula (MacDonald’s thesis), whereas another sees the formula itself as inherently middle- brow (Lynes’). This chapter will not adjudicate between these conflicting views of middlebrow cinema. Rather, it will argue that a critical tension characterizes enter- tainment cinema’s relationship to middle-class culture during the studio era. Like other related critical dichotomies (drama/melodrama, men’s pictures/women’s pic- tures or writer/director), the definitional problems of middlebrow cinema/popular cinema were in fact built into Hollywood’s complicated place in American taste formations. In the 1940s, these tensions became more acute and rose to the surface of the films and their reception. Whereas middlebrow culture had antecedents in earlier decades, as Rubin’s examples of Alexander Woollcott or the book-of-the-month club suggest, in the 1940s there emerged a self-conscious attempt to identify and name the phenomenon. Lynes’ essay itself is an important marker of this shift, but so Hollywood middlebrow 17 too are the f ilms of this period. Although a discourse on the middlebrow is some- times considered to be primarily a phenomenon of post-war and in particular 1950s culture (Staiger 1992, 92; Conroy 1996), already in the 1940s, films were wrestling with the problems of the ‘middle’ of taste stratification. This chapter will use the example of one year, 1947, as an inductive sample, in conjunction with examples from throughout the 1940s. A fuller examination of the decade challenges the static conceptualization that Film Studies often has of popular and middlebrow taste in classical cinema. To reappraise the middlebrow in 1940s cinema is a two-fold opera- tion: first, it connects the critical ambiguity of the middlebrow to the complexity of 1940s cinema; second, it addresses the class self-reflexivity of Hollywood without simply reading past it. It may be difficult to analyse middlebrow cinema without the weight of class condescension the term carries with it, but the complexity and para- doxes of 1940s Hollywood give a good reason to try. Middlebrow/middle-class/moyen One of the greatest difficulties with assessing the role of the middlebrow in Hollywood is the term itself. To proclaim a film ‘middlebrow’ is to invoke a posi- tion of class superiority, and critiques of the term focus on its pejorative baggage. To use the example of Andrew Sarris, ‘middlebrow’ is clearly an insult in much criticism and popular usage, yet even when the analysis of taste is carried out with a more neutral aim, the label ‘middlebrow’ must call out the middlebrow’s cul- tural ‘mistakes’ to analyse them. In his study Distinction, Pierre Bourdieu offers an identification of middlebrow, or, more precisely, petit-bourgeois taste as a ‘cultural allodoxia . the mistaken identifications and false recognitions which betray the gap between acknowledgment and knowledge’ (1984, 323). 1940s Hollywood films even depicted this allodoxia in their narratives. In A Tree Grows in Brooklyn (Kazan 1945), for example, Francie Nolan (Peggy Ann Garner) is characterized as a voracious reader who works her way alphabetically through the books in the library, to the bemused surprise of a librarian who eventually gives her guidance. Francie’s desire to read every book represents the limit case of a cultural consump- tion without discrimination, or acknowledgement without knowledge, and the librarian’s guidance figures for the kind of cultural authority comparable to that important middlebrow institution, the book-of-the-month club. As such, Francie could allegorize a film industry itself trying to edify itself through the values of literature. At the same time, the adult spectator recognizes the folly of Francie’s attempt while perhaps sympathizing with her desire for edification. The elasticity of the concept of middlebrow lies in its ability to encompass both the narrowest of middlebrow ‘cultural goodwill’ (Bourdieu 1984, 318) and the earnest desire to ‘correct’ cultural mistakes. A Tree Grows in Brooklyn therefore shows how both the spectator’s and the crit- ic’s superior cultural taste and knowledge constitute the middlebrow. Mistakes are only mistakes to the extent someone can recognize them. For instance, Marianne Conroy considers Tennessee Williams to function as a middlebrow marker in 18 Chris Cagle Imitation of Life (Sirk 1959): ‘The possibility that Lora might audition for a Williams play is no sooner proffered than it is dropped’ (1996, 119). This reading usefully opens up Imitation of Life for a reading as middlebrow culture, but it also invites the scholar to assume a position of superiority in comparison to an assumed lack of knowledge on the part of the middlebrow spectator. The implicit spectator’s first mistake would be to consider Tennessee Williams to be good theatre when in fact this spectator does not really know or prefer the kind of legitimate drama that Williams represents. The second is that Williams himself represents a crowd- pleasing strain in American drama, for which more appropriate reading formations are possibly available – notably camp ones. As Conroy notes, MacDonald and other critics saw Broadway legitimate theatre as one of the worst offenders of mid- dlebrow culture. Critics who seek to read the ‘status panic’ that C. Wright Mills (1956) identified in the mid-century middle classes may simply be reinforcing the status stability of the bourgeois intellectual position.
Recommended publications
  • Ronald Davis Oral History Collection on the Performing Arts
    Oral History Collection on the Performing Arts in America Southern Methodist University The Southern Methodist University Oral History Program was begun in 1972 and is part of the University’s DeGolyer Institute for American Studies. The goal is to gather primary source material for future writers and cultural historians on all branches of the performing arts- opera, ballet, the concert stage, theatre, films, radio, television, burlesque, vaudeville, popular music, jazz, the circus, and miscellaneous amateur and local productions. The Collection is particularly strong, however, in the areas of motion pictures and popular music and includes interviews with celebrated performers as well as a wide variety of behind-the-scenes personnel, several of whom are now deceased. Most interviews are biographical in nature although some are focused exclusively on a single topic of historical importance. The Program aims at balancing national developments with examples from local history. Interviews with members of the Dallas Little Theatre, therefore, serve to illustrate a nation-wide movement, while film exhibition across the country is exemplified by the Interstate Theater Circuit of Texas. The interviews have all been conducted by trained historians, who attempt to view artistic achievements against a broad social and cultural backdrop. Many of the persons interviewed, because of educational limitations or various extenuating circumstances, would never write down their experiences, and therefore valuable information on our nation’s cultural heritage would be lost if it were not for the S.M.U. Oral History Program. Interviewees are selected on the strength of (1) their contribution to the performing arts in America, (2) their unique position in a given art form, and (3) availability.
    [Show full text]
  • ANGELA LANSBURY (Angela Brigid Lansbury) Filmografia Essenziale Dal 1963 Al 2011
    ANGELA LANSBURY (Angela Brigid Lansbury) Filmografia essenziale dal 1944 al 1962 ANNO TITOLO TITOLO ORIGINALE REGIA VOTO 1944 ANGOSCIA GASLIGHT GEORGE CUKOR 8,5 1944 GRAN PREMIO NATIONAL VELVET CLARENCE BROWN 7,5 1945 IL RITRATTO DI DORIAN GRAY THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY ALBERT LEWIN 8 1946 NUVOLE PASSEGGERE TILL THE CLOUDS ROLL BY RICHARD WHORF 6,5 1946 LE RAGAZZE DI HARVEY THE HARVEY GIRLS GEORGE SIDNEY 7,5 1947 IL DISONESTO THE PRIVATE AFFAIRS OF BEL AMI ALBERT LEWIN 8 1947 PECCATORI SENZA PECCATO IF WINTER COMES VICTOR SAVILLE 7 1948 LO STATO DELL' UNIONE STATE OF THE UNION FRANK CAPRA 8 1948 I TRE MOSCHETTIERI THE THREE MUSKETEERS GEORGE SIDNEY 8,5 1949 IL DANUBIO ROSSO THE RED DANUBE GEORGE SIDNEY 6,5 1949 SANSONE E DALILA SAMSON AND DELILAH CECIL B. DE MILLE 7,5 1952 GLI AMMUTINATI DELL' ATLANTICO MUTINY EDWARD DMYTRYK 7 1953 LA PORTA DEL MISTERO REMAINS TO BE SEEN DON WEIS 7 1954 L' ULTIMO AGGUATO A LIFE AT STAKE PAUL GUILFOYLE 7 1955 IL GIULLARE DEL RE THE COURT JESTER N. PANAMA • M. FRANK 7,5 1955 LA MASCHERA DI PORPORA THE PURPLE MASK BRUCE HUMBERSTONE 7 1955 I SENZA DIO A LAWLESS STREET JOSEPH H. LEWIS 7 1956 MI DOVRAI UCCIDERE PLEASE MURDER ME! PETER GODFREY 6,5 1958 COME SPOSARE UNA FIGLIA THE RELUCTANT DEBUTANTE VINCENTE MINNELLI 7,5 1958 LA LUNGA ESTATE CALDA THE LONG HOT SUMMER MARTIN RITT 7,5 1959 L' ESTATE DELLA DICIASSETTESIMA BAMBOLA THE SUMMER OF THE 17TH DOLL LESLIE NORMAN 6,5 1960 IL BUIO IN CIMA ALLE SCALE THE DARK AT THE TOP OF THE STAIRS DELBERT MANN 7 1960 OLYMPIA A BREATH OF SCANDAL M.
    [Show full text]
  • Shail, Robert, British Film Directors
    BRITISH FILM DIRECTORS INTERNATIONAL FILM DIRECTOrs Series Editor: Robert Shail This series of reference guides covers the key film directors of a particular nation or continent. Each volume introduces the work of 100 contemporary and historically important figures, with entries arranged in alphabetical order as an A–Z. The Introduction to each volume sets out the existing context in relation to the study of the national cinema in question, and the place of the film director within the given production/cultural context. Each entry includes both a select bibliography and a complete filmography, and an index of film titles is provided for easy cross-referencing. BRITISH FILM DIRECTORS A CRITI Robert Shail British national cinema has produced an exceptional track record of innovative, ca creative and internationally recognised filmmakers, amongst them Alfred Hitchcock, Michael Powell and David Lean. This tradition continues today with L GUIDE the work of directors as diverse as Neil Jordan, Stephen Frears, Mike Leigh and Ken Loach. This concise, authoritative volume analyses critically the work of 100 British directors, from the innovators of the silent period to contemporary auteurs. An introduction places the individual entries in context and examines the role and status of the director within British film production. Balancing academic rigour ROBE with accessibility, British Film Directors provides an indispensable reference source for film students at all levels, as well as for the general cinema enthusiast. R Key Features T SHAIL • A complete list of each director’s British feature films • Suggested further reading on each filmmaker • A comprehensive career overview, including biographical information and an assessment of the director’s current critical standing Robert Shail is a Lecturer in Film Studies at the University of Wales Lampeter.
    [Show full text]
  • Victor Saville - Film Producer and Director
    Victor Saville - Film Producer and Director An art dealer's son, Victor Saville lived at 13 Speedwell Road in Balsall Heath and was educated at King Edward VI Grammar School in Birmingham. He served in the British Army during World War I, was wounded at the Battle of Loos in 1915 and invalided out the following year. His first involvement with the film business was as manager of a small theatre in Coventry, where he worked during the evenings. In the daytime, he was employed in a film distribution office. From 1917, Saville worked in the Features and Newsreels Department of the Pathé organisation in London. Just two years later, he co-founded Victory Pictures in conjunction with Michael Balcon. He produced his first film, Woman to Woman, with Michael Balcon in 1923, and on the back of its success produced pictures for the veteran director Maurice Elvey, including the classic British silent Hindle Wakes (1927). His first picture as director was The Arcadians in 1927. In 1929 he and Michael Balcon worked together again on a talkie remake of Woman to Woman for Balcon's company, Gainsborough Pictures, this time directed by Saville himself. From 1931, as Gainsborough Pictures and the Gaumont British Picture Corporation joined forces, Victor Saville produced a string of comedies, musicals and dramas for Gainsborough and Gaumont-British, including the popular Jessie Matthews pictures. In 1937 he left to set up his own production company, Victor Saville Productions, and made three pictures for Alexander Korda's London Films at Denham studios. As an independent producer he had purchased the film rights to A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1948-02-20, [P ]
    d Friday, February 20,1948 TOLEDO UNION JOURNAL Page Five “My Girl Tisa” Esther Williams ■y ■v Battling 7 lie Keys ''-n ‘ '■! / ' * HOLLYWOOD — Esther Williams is trying to dupli­ cate her speed in the swim­ ming pool on a typewriter. The amphibious Metro- Goldwyn-Mayer star, re­ Fortune Tn Jewels cently returned from a per­ Teen-Agers Find Hollywood sonal appearance tour in Screen-Tested AVith connection with the Tech­ Barbara Stanwyck nicolor musical, “This Time Land Of Opportunity HOLLYWOOD — A fortune For Keeps,” is battling a January 1 deadline. HOLLYWOOD—Hollywood is the teen-agers best booster. in jewels to be worn by Barbara % In no other field of professional activity do ambitious adol­ Stanwyck in Hal Wallis’ “Sorry, Scheduled for summer escents get so many opportunities of putting their talents to work release> Miss Williams’ with such profitable results in keeping the piggy bank full. The Wrong Humber” was screen- 41 / fy. Ok' AA-Aa^A^A book, “Or Would You tested at Paramount when a Rather Be A Fish?” must movie-makers have long made a jractice of keeping their talent reach publishers Doubleday, scouts on the lookout fo promis­ quarter of a million dollars in Doran and Company, be­ ing teen-age material for future T7i roiving Gurred diamonds and other precious stardom. stones were photographed. 0 "W'J fore the New Year. Petite Wanda Hendrix, whose A guide to swimming, A heavy squad of studio five feet, two inches hardly ta. the book covers all angles measure up to her large abilities % police was stationed on Stage 7 of the aquatic art.
    [Show full text]
  • Ealing Studios and the Ealing Comedies: the Tip of the Iceberg
    Ealing Studios and the Ealing Comedies: the Tip of the Iceberg ROBERT WINTER* In lecture form this paper was illustrated with video clips from Ealing films. These are noted below in boxes in the text. My subject is the legendary Ealing Studios comedies. But the comedies were only the tip of the iceberg. To show this I will give a sketch of the film industry leading to Ealing' s success, and of the part played by Sir Michael Balcon over 25 years.! Today, by touching a button or flicking a switch, we can see our values, styles, misdemeanours, the romance of the past and present-and, with imagination, a vision of the" future. Now, there are new technologies, of morphing, foreground overlays, computerised sets, electronic models. These technologies affect enormously our ability to give currency to our creative impulses and credibility to what we do. They change the way films can be produced and, importantly, they change the level of costs for production. During the early 'talkie' period there many artistic and technical difficulties. For example, artists had to use deep pan make-up to' compensate for the high levels of carbon arc lighting required by lower film speeds. The camera had to be put into a soundproof booth when shooting back projection for car travelling sequences. * Robert Winter has been associated with the film and television industries since he appeared in three Gracie Fields films in the mid-1930s. He joined Ealing Studios as an associate editor in 1942 and worked there on more than twenty features. After working with other studios he became a founding member of Yorkshire Television in 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory to Archival Boxes in the Motion Picture, Broadcasting, and Recorded Sound Division of the Library of Congress
    INVENTORY TO ARCHIVAL BOXES IN THE MOTION PICTURE, BROADCASTING, AND RECORDED SOUND DIVISION OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Compiled by MBRS Staff (Last Update December 2017) Introduction The following is an inventory of film and television related paper and manuscript materials held by the Motion Picture, Broadcasting and Recorded Sound Division of the Library of Congress. Our collection of paper materials includes continuities, scripts, tie-in-books, scrapbooks, press releases, newsreel summaries, publicity notebooks, press books, lobby cards, theater programs, production notes, and much more. These items have been acquired through copyright deposit, purchased, or gifted to the division. How to Use this Inventory The inventory is organized by box number with each letter representing a specific box type. The majority of the boxes listed include content information. Please note that over the years, the content of the boxes has been described in different ways and are not consistent. The “card” column used to refer to a set of card catalogs that documented our holdings of particular paper materials: press book, posters, continuity, reviews, and other. The majority of this information has been entered into our Merged Audiovisual Information System (MAVIS) database. Boxes indicating “MAVIS” in the last column have catalog records within the new database. To locate material, use the CTRL-F function to search the document by keyword, title, or format. Paper and manuscript materials are also listed in the MAVIS database. This database is only accessible on-site in the Moving Image Research Center. If you are unable to locate a specific item in this inventory, please contact the reading room.
    [Show full text]
  • 'A British Empire of Their Own? Jewish Entrepreneurs in the British Film
    ‘A British Empire of Their Own? Jewish Entrepreneurs in the British Film Industry’ Andrew Spicer (University of the West of England) Introduction The importance of Jewish entrepreneurs in the development of Hollywood has long been recognized, notably in Neil Gabler’s classic study, An Empire of Their Own (1988). No comparable investigation and analysis of the Jewish presence in the British film industry has been conducted.1 This article provides a preliminary overview of the most significant Jewish entrepreneurs involved in British film culture from the early pioneers through to David Puttnam. I use the term ‘entrepreneur’ rather than ‘film-maker’ because I am analyzing film as an industry, thus excluding technical personnel, including directors.2 Space restrictions have meant the reluctant omission of Sidney Bernstein and Oscar Deutsch because the latter was engaged solely in cinema building and the former more significant in the development of commercial television.3 I have also confined myself to Jews born in the UK, thus excluding the Danziger brothers, Filippo del Giudice, Menahem Golan and Yoram Globus, Alexander Korda, Harry Saltzman and Max Schach.4 I should emphasize that my aim is to characterize the nature of the contribution of my chosen figures to the development of British cinema, not provide detailed career profiles.5 The idea that Jews controlled the British film industry surfaced most noticeably in the late 1930s when the undercurrent of anti-Semitic prejudice in British society took public forms; Isidore Ostrer, head of the giant Gaumont-British Picture Corporation (GBPC) was referred to in the House of Commons as an ‘unnaturalised alien’ (Low 1985: 243).
    [Show full text]
  • The Many Deaths of Peggie Castle Jake Hinkson
    The Many Deaths of Peggie Castle Jake Hinkson n Hollywood’s Golden Age, beauty was turned into a commodity, one found in abundance and renewed with each out-of-town bus. Thousands of lovely young women cycled through the system, had their physical attributes capital- ized upon, and wound up back on the street with little more than the handful of cash it would take to get back home. Of these unlucky multitudes, few lived long enough to see themselves become a new kind of star: the rediscovered filmI noir icon, the object of scholarly study and geek adoration. 42 NOIR CITY I SUMMER 2013 I filmnoirfoundation.org Though a lot of actresses played the doomed bad girl, Peggie Castle seemed to embody the ethos somehow. Something about her seemed dangerous—which is another way of saying, perhaps, that something about her threatened men. With her low, smoky voice and skeptical green eyes, she wasn’t hot, she was cool. She never seemed to lose con- trol. Her sensuality always seemed to be hers to do with as she pleased, a tool to get what she wanted. If this was her innate quality as an actor, then she was made to suffer for it in film after film. That cool quality seemed to reflect the real woman as well. Well- educated and ambitious, she had a caustic wit about most things, and she evinced few romantic illusions about the business she’d cho- sen for herself. “The difference between an old fashioned kiss and a movie kiss,” she said once, “is about 1500 feet of film.” She lived a disconnected life from the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • A Salute to the National Film Archive, British Film Institute
    The Museum of Modern Art Department of Film 11 West 53 Street, New York, N.Y. 10019 Tel: 212-708-9400 Cable: MODERNART Telex: 62370 MODART ENTRANCE at 18 W. 54 release #10 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE A SALUTE TO THE NATIONAL FILM ARCHIVE, BRITISH FILM INSTITUTE April 29 - May 19, 1983 In celebration of the 50th Anniversary of the British Film Institute, and as part of the city-wide "Britain Salutes New York" Festival, The Department of Film of The Museum of Modern Art and The National Film Archive of the British Film Institute will co-present 18 programs of films culled from the London archive. The three-week series, to be screened in MoMA's Roy and Niuta Titus Theater 2 from April 29 through May 19, 1983, will include an eclectic sampling of British films preserved by the National Film Archive. The series will'include such classics as Alfred Hitchcock's 1926 The Lodger, Laurence Olivier's Henry V (1944), Alexander Korda's Rem­ brandt (1936) with Charles Laughton in the title role, E.A. Dupont's Piccadilly (1929), also starring Laughton with Anna May Wong, and, in a newly restored color print, Herbert Wilcox's 1937 Victoria the Great. The series will feature some exciting rediscoveries as well, among them Laburnum Grove (1936), an early Carol Reed comedy from the J.B. Priestley play, and Victor Saville's elegant First a Girl (1935), starring Jessie Matthews and taken from the same source as Blake Edwards's recent Victor/Victoria. Other programs include the directorial debut of writers Frank Launder and Sidney Gilliat with their 1943 wartime drama, Millions Like Us, to be shown in its original version for the first time in the U.S.; John and Roy Boulting's tense and low-key thriller, Seven Days to Noon (1950); and No Funny Business, a 1933 trifle (in its abbreviated 1951 reissue version) in which Laurence Olivier watches Gertrude Lawrence play the piano in a most unusual fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the British Biopic: Evolution, Conventions, Reception and Masculinities
    Mapping the British Biopic: Evolution, Conventions, Reception and Masculinities Matthew Robinson A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the West of England, Bristol for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts, Creative Industries and Education, University of the West of England, Bristol June 2016 90,792 words Contents Abstract 2 Chapter One: Introduction 3 Chapter Two: Critical Review 24 Chapter Three: Producing the British Biopic 1900-2014 63 Chapter Four: The Reception of the British Biopic 121 Chapter Five: Conventions and Themes of the British 154 Biopic Chapter Six: This is His Story: ‘Wounded’ Men and 200 Homosocial Bonds Chapter Seven: The Contemporary British Biopic 1: 219 Wounded Men Chapter Eight: The Contemporary British Biopic 2: 263 Homosocial Recoveries Chapter Nine: Conclusion 310 Bibliography 323 General Filmography 355 Appendix One: Timeline of the British Biopic 1900-2014 360 Appendix Two: Distribution of Gender and Professional 390 Field in the British Biopic 1900-2014 Appendix Three: Column and Pie Charts of Gender and 391 Profession Distribution in British Biopics Appendix Four: Biopic Production as Proportion of Total 394 UK Film Production Previously Published Material 395 1 Abstract This thesis offers a revaluation of the British biopic, which has often been subsumed into the broader ‘historical film’ category, identifying a critical neglect despite its successful presence throughout the history of the British film industry. It argues that the biopic is a necessary category because producers, reviewers and cinemagoers have significant investments in biographical subjects, and because biopics construct a ‘public history’ for a broad audience.
    [Show full text]
  • British Newspapers and Films in the Interwar Period: a History and a Review
    ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output The representation of London nights in British popu- lar press and film, 1919-1939 https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40490/ Version: Public Version Citation: Arts, Mara (2020) The representation of London nights in British popular press and film, 1919-1939. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email The Representation of London Nights in British Popular Press and Film, 1919-1939 Candidate name: Mara Arts Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Birkbeck, University of London 1 Declaration of original work I hereby confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. 2 Abstract This thesis explores the representation of night-time activities in the capital in popular British newspapers and films of the period. It argues that, whilst an increasingly democratised night allowed for more opportunities for previously marginalised groups, popular media of the period largely promoted adherence to the status quo. The thesis draws on extensive primary source material, including eighty British feature films and newspaper samples of the Daily Mail, Daily Express and Daily Mirror to systematically analyse the representation of London’s nightlife in the British interwar period. This period saw the consolidation of the popular daily newspaper industry and, after government intervention, an expansion of the domestic film industry. The interwar period also saw great social change with universal suffrage, technological developments and an economic crisis.
    [Show full text]