DOCSLIB.ORG

2KSWIN WWE2KBG XB1 Onlin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2KSWIN WWE2KBG XB1 Onlin AVERTISSEMENT Certaines personnes peuvent être victimes de troubles convulsifs lorsqu’exposées aux clignotements de lumière et images de jeux vidéos. (xbox.com/healthandsafety). Support produit : http://support.2k.com CONTRÔLES DÉPLACEMENT • : Marcher • MAINTENIR : Courir • PRÈS DES CORDES : Entrer/Sortir du ring • MAINTENIR PRÈS DES CORDES : Entrer/Sortir du ring • + PRÈS DE LA PROTECTION DE COIN : Monter sur le coin LES BASES • : Coup de poing • : Coup de pied • : Irish Whip • MAINTENIR : Irish Whip puissant • : Projection • APPUYER SUR : Demander de l'aide à l'équipier (Tag Team uniquement) 1 VERROUILLER UN ADVERSAIRE • : Cibler des adversaires différents 2 ENDURANCE ET SANTÉ Les combos, projections spéciales et coups spéciaux consomment de l'endurance. Courir et bloquer réduira aussi votre endurance. Vous devez attendre que la barre d'endurance remonte pour effectuer certains coups. La barre de santé sera réduite quand vous subissez des attaques. Plus votre barre de santé sera réduite, plus le risque d'un tombé ou d'une soumission sera élevé. 3 STYLE DES CATÉGORIES Chaque catégorie dispose de ses propres coups et projections. Brute, Technicien, Aérien, Bagarreur et Équilibré. TECHNICIEN : Spécialiste en technique de catch et incomparable en ce qui concerne les soumissions. AÉRIEN : Spécialiste en manœuvres aériennes, dont les sauts des cordes et des coins. BRUTE : Superstars les plus puissantes qui utilisent leur force pour exécuter des coups dévastateurs. BAGARREUR : Spécialiste en frappes. ÉQUILIBRÉ : Combine les styles pour réaliser des combos spectaculaires et impressionner le public. 4 COMBOS • + + : Combo de coups de poing • + + : Combo de coups de pied Certains combos sont spécifiques aux classes. BRUTE BAGARREUR ÉQUILIBRÉ TECHNICIEN AÉRIEN + + COMBO ✔ ✔ ✔ ✖ ✖ DE COUPS DE POING + + COMBO ✔ ✔ ✔ ✖ ✖ DE COUPS DE POING + + COMBO ✖ ✖ ✔ ✔ ✔ DE COUPS DE PIED + + COMBO ✖ ✖ ✔ ✔ ✔ DE COUPS DE PIED PROJECTIONS SPÉCIALES BRUTE BAGARREUR ÉQUILIBRÉ TECHNICIEN AÉRIEN STICK ANALOGIQUE DROIT VERS LE HAUT ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ STICK ANALOGIQUE DROIT VERS LE BAS ✔ ✖ ✔ ✖ ✖ STICK ANALOGIQUE DROIT VERS LA GAUCHE ✔ ✖ ✖ ✔ ✔ STICK ANALOGIQUE DROIT VERS LA DROITE ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ + STICK ANALOGIQUE DROIT VERS LE HAUT ✔ ✖ ✖ ✔ ✔ + STICK ANALOGIQUE DROIT VERS LE BAS ✖ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ + STICK ANALOGIQUE DROIT VERS LA GAUCHE ✖ ✔ ✖ ✖ ✖ + STICK ANALOGIQUE DROIT VERS LA DROITE Projection Spéciale 8 (Disponible pour certaines Superstars) 5 PROJETER ET PORTER • : Irish Whip • Frapper après un Irish Whip • Effectuer une projection après un Irish Whip • Donner un coup de pied après un Irish Whip • Maintenir : Irish Whip puissant • Maintenir : Porter • : Projeter l'adversaire • : Projeter l'adversaire près des cordes : Projeter un adversaire hors du ring près des environnements interactifs : Certaines arènes comportent des environnements interactifs. Quand l'indication apparaît, vous pouvez y projeter vos adversaires pour leur infliger des dégâts supplémentaires. 6 MOUVEMENTS SPÉCIAUX • + : Coup de poing spécial • + : Mouvement spécial • + : Mouvement spécial disponible pour les classes Brute, Bagarreur et Aérien • + : Irish Whip Spécial 7 COUP SPÉCIAL / FINISHER Les coups spéciaux et Finishers sont vos attaques les plus puissantes. Augmentez votre Heat pour les réaliser. • + : Coup spécial/Finisher quand la barre de Heat est pleine. 8 ATTAQUES EN COURSE • + : Coup de poing en course • + : Coup de pied en course • + : Projection en course • + près des cordes : Plongeon (Aériens, Techniciens & Équilibrés uniquement) • + devant les cordes : Coup avec rebond (Aériens uniquement) 9 ATTAQUES SUR LE TAPIS • : Relever l'adversaire • : Tombé • Maintenir : Soumission • Appuyer rapidement sur et : Lancer le mini-jeu pour se libérer d'un tombé ou d'une soumission • quand l'adversaire est au sol : Attaque au sol • + quand l'adversaire est au sol : Coup 10 ATTAQUES DE TABLIER, PROTECTION DE COIN ET REBOND • + : Rentrer/Sortir du ring depuis le tablier • : Frapper un adversaire depuis le tablier • : Frapper avec rebond depuis le tablier (Aériens uniquement) • : Projection avec rebond depuis le tablier (Aériens uniquement) • + : Monter/descendre depuis le coin • / : Coup depuis le coin • : Projection depuis la protection de coin • quand l'adversaire est étourdi dans le coin : Mini-jeux dans le coin • quand l'adversaire est debout dans le coin : Projection depuis le coin • quand l'adversaire est debout sur le coin : Coup de poing 11 12 DÉFENSE • MAINTENIR : Bloquer • APPUYER SUR au moment du coup : Contrer • Appuyer rapidement sur au sol : Se relever • Appuyer sur la touche indiquée quand l'indication apparaît pour contrer les prises et projections ennemies. OBJETS Il est possible d'amener différents objets dans le ring. On peut trouver des motos, des marteaux factices, des chaises et des guitares sous le ring. Il est aussi possible d'obtenir un shinai auprès du public. • : ramasser/lâcher l'objet • près du ring : Ramasser une arme sous le ring • près du public : Ramasser le shinai quand un membre du public le brandit • quand équipé d'un objet : Attaquer avec l'objet • quand équipé d'un objet : Lâcher l'objet • près des objets d'arène : Interagir avec des objets d'arènes pour les utiliser contre vos adversaires 13 BONUS, BARRE DE PUBLIC ET PROVOC' • : Bonus de rang un • : Bonus de rang deux • : Bonus de rang trois • : Provoc' Il y a trois niveaux de bonus, qu'on appelle les rangs. Chaque Superstar peut être équipée d'un bonus par rang. N'oubliez pas d'équiper les bonus à votre Superstar pour en profiter durant les matchs. Ceux-ci seront disponibles en remplissant la barre de bonus. Les utiliser videra cette barre. Les provoc' permettent de vous faire apprécier du public et remplissent la barre de public et votre Heat. 14 Si vous voulez devenir le chouchou du public, utilisez les coups qu'ils réclament. Si vos actions sont répétitives ou ennuyantes, ils risquent de vous huer ! Quand vous utilisez un coup réclamé par le public, la barre de public se remplira. Il vous sera alors plus facile de remporter le match avec un tombé ou une soumission. Si vous êtes inactif, la barre de public baissera. 15 JOUABILITÉ 16 CAMPAGNE Vivez les aventures de sept amateurs qui gravissent les échelons sur le ring pour rejoindre les grands noms de l'Univers de la WWE. Pendant votre voyage, vous pourrez débloquer de nouveaux Battlegrounds, bonus, tenues et Superstars exclusives. À vous la gloire ! 17 EXHIBITION En mode Exhibition, vous pouvez participer avec n'importe quelle Superstar débloquée du jeu ! Sélectionnez simplement un mode de jeu et établissez les règles comme bon vous semble. Défiez vos amis en ligne ou en réseau local et réglez vos comptes sur le ring ! Vous aurez un grand choix de types de matchs en mode Exhibition, comme par exemple : 1 CONTRE 1 18 TAG TEAM TORNADO TAG TEAM 19 TRIPLE THREAT / FATAL 4-WAY STEEL CAGE 1V1 ET 2V2 20 ROYAL RUMBLE GAUNTLET 21 DÉFIS QUOTIDIENS Obtenez des réponses exclusives en terminant les défis quotidiens de WWE 2K Battleground ! Trois défis sont toujours disponibles. Vous pouvez tous les terminer ou en rejeter un par jour. Une fois un défi quotidien complété, il sera remplacé par un nouveau le jour suivant. TOURNOIS Participez à des tournois contre des Superstars du monde entier. Atteignez la finale pour obtenir des récompenses exclusives. Certains tournois ont un prix d'entrée que vous pouvez payer en Battle Bucks ou en Golden Bucks. 22 KING OF THE BATTLEGROUND Affrontez des Superstars du monde entier pour rester dans le ring le plus longtemps possible et devenir le King of the Battleground. Éliminez les autres joueurs en les faisant sortir du ring. Une Superstar qui sort du ring est automatiquement éliminée Les nouvelles Superstars qui arrivent doivent attendre leur tour en dehors du ring. Lorsqu'un joueur est éliminé, la Superstar qui a attendu le plus longtemps entre sur le ring. Plus vous restez longtemps sur le ring, meilleure sera votre récompense, alors faites de votre mieux pour tenir le plus longtemps possible ! DÉFI BATTLEGROUND Créez votre propre Superstar et lancez votre carrière. Participez à tous les événements dans l'arbre d'aptitudes pour obtenir des Battle Bucks, des récompenses et une ceinture de prestige. Vous pouvez rejouer et recréer d'autres Superstars pour obtenir davantage de ceintures de prestige. 23 BOUTIQUE ET ARGENT Vous pouvez acheter de nouvelles Superstars et objets vanité dans la boutique. La boutique reçoit sans cesse de nouvelles offres. Ce contenu peut être débloqué avec les Battle Bucks obtenus ou les Golden Bucks achetés. BATTLE BUCKS Gagnez des Battle Bucks en jouant à différents modes de jeu. L'intégralité des Superstars et des objets vanité peut être débloquée avec des Battle Bucks. GOLDEN BUCKS Vous pouvez acheter des Golden Bucks dans la boutique pour débloquer immédiatement des Superstars et des objets de vanité au lieu d'utiliser vos Battle Bucks obtenus en jouant. 24 CRÉATEUR DE PERSONNAGE Vous pouvez créer votre propre Superstar et personnaliser de nombreux aspects comme sa couleur de peau, sa taille, son poids, ses vêtements, ses animations, et bien d'autres. Le Créateur de personnage est disponible depuis le menu principal. Le contenu peut être débloqué avec les Battle Bucks obtenus ou les Golden Bucks achetés. 25 CRÉATEUR DE BATTLEGROUND Vous pouvez créer votre propre Battlegrounds et les personnaliser avec des objets vanité comme les protections de coin, les cordes, les bâches, l'éclairage et bien d'autres. Les Battlegrounds personnalisés sont utilisables en Mode Exhibition et dans les tournois. Le Créateur de
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unintended Consequences of the American Presidential Selection System
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLP\15-1\HLP104.txt unknown Seq: 1 14-JUL-21 12:54 The Best Laid Plans: Unintended Consequences of the American Presidential Selection System Samuel S.-H. Wang and Jacob S. Canter* The mechanism for selecting the President of the United States, the Electoral College, causes outcomes that weaken American democracy and that the delegates at the Constitu- tional Convention never intended. The core selection process described in Article II, Section 1 was hastily drawn in the final days of the Convention based on compromises made originally to benefit slave-owning states and states with smaller populations. The system was also drafted to have electors deliberate and then choose the President in an age when travel and news took weeks or longer to cross the new country. In the four decades after ratification, the Electoral College was modified further to reach its current form, which includes most states using a winner-take-all method to allocate electors. The original needs this system was designed to address have now disappeared. But the persistence of these Electoral College mechanisms still causes severe unanticipated problems, including (1) con- tradictions between the electoral vote winner and national popular vote winner, (2) a “battleground state” phenomenon where all but a handful of states are safe for one political party or the other, (3) representational and policy benefits that citizens in only some states receive, (4) a decrease in the political power of non-battleground demographic groups, and (5) vulnerability of elections to interference. These outcomes will not go away without intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • POLL RESULTS: Congressional Bipartisanship Nationwide and in Battleground States
    POLL RESULTS: Congressional Bipartisanship Nationwide and in Battleground States 1 Voters think Congress is dysfunctional and reject the suggestion that it is effective. Please indicate whether you think this word or phrase describes the United States Congress, or not. Nationwide Battleground Nationwide Independents Battleground Independents Dysfunctional 60 60 61 64 Broken 56 58 58 60 Ineffective 54 54 55 56 Gridlocked 50 48 52 50 Partisan 42 37 40 33 0 Bipartisan 7 8 7 8 Has America's best 3 2 3 interests at heart 3 Functioning 2 2 2 3 Effective 2 2 2 3 2 Political frustrations center around politicians’ inability to collaborate in a productive way. Which of these problems frustrates you the most? Nationwide Battleground Nationwide Independents Battleground Independents Politicians can’t work together to get things done anymore. 41 37 41 39 Career politicians have been in office too long and don’t 29 30 30 30 understand the needs of regular people. Politicians are politicizing issues that really shouldn’t be 14 13 12 14 politicized. Out political system is broken and doesn’t work for me. 12 15 12 12 3 Candidates who brand themselves as bipartisan will have a better chance of winning in upcoming elections. For which candidate for Congress would you be more likely to vote? A candidate who is willing to compromise to A candidate who will stay true to his/her get things done principles and not make any concessions NationwideNationwide 72 28 Nationwide Nationwide Independents Independents 74 26 BattlegroundBattleground 70 30 Battleground Battleground IndependentsIndependents 73 27 A candidate who will vote for bipartisan A candidate who will resist bipartisan legislation legislation and stick with his/her party NationwideNationwide 83 17 Nationwide IndependentsNationwide Independents 86 14 BattlegroundBattleground 82 18 Battleground BattlegroundIndependents Independents 88 12 4 Across the country, voters agree that they want members of Congress to work together.
    [Show full text]
  • The Popular Culture Studies Journal
    THE POPULAR CULTURE STUDIES JOURNAL VOLUME 6 NUMBER 1 2018 Editor NORMA JONES Liquid Flicks Media, Inc./IXMachine Managing Editor JULIA LARGENT McPherson College Assistant Editor GARRET L. CASTLEBERRY Mid-America Christian University Copy Editor Kevin Calcamp Queens University of Charlotte Reviews Editor MALYNNDA JOHNSON Indiana State University Assistant Reviews Editor JESSICA BENHAM University of Pittsburgh Please visit the PCSJ at: http://mpcaaca.org/the-popular-culture- studies-journal/ The Popular Culture Studies Journal is the official journal of the Midwest Popular and American Culture Association. Copyright © 2018 Midwest Popular and American Culture Association. All rights reserved. MPCA/ACA, 421 W. Huron St Unit 1304, Chicago, IL 60654 Cover credit: Cover Artwork: “Wrestling” by Brent Jones © 2018 Courtesy of https://openclipart.org EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD ANTHONY ADAH FALON DEIMLER Minnesota State University, Moorhead University of Wisconsin-Madison JESSICA AUSTIN HANNAH DODD Anglia Ruskin University The Ohio State University AARON BARLOW ASHLEY M. DONNELLY New York City College of Technology (CUNY) Ball State University Faculty Editor, Academe, the magazine of the AAUP JOSEF BENSON LEIGH H. EDWARDS University of Wisconsin Parkside Florida State University PAUL BOOTH VICTOR EVANS DePaul University Seattle University GARY BURNS JUSTIN GARCIA Northern Illinois University Millersville University KELLI S. BURNS ALEXANDRA GARNER University of South Florida Bowling Green State University ANNE M. CANAVAN MATTHEW HALE Salt Lake Community College Indiana University, Bloomington ERIN MAE CLARK NICOLE HAMMOND Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota University of California, Santa Cruz BRIAN COGAN ART HERBIG Molloy College Indiana University - Purdue University, Fort Wayne JARED JOHNSON ANDREW F. HERRMANN Thiel College East Tennessee State University JESSE KAVADLO MATTHEW NICOSIA Maryville University of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Trump 41% 55% 4%
    August 13-17, 2017 / N=1,000 Registered voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. THE GEORGE WASHINGTON BATTLEGROUND POLL A national survey of 1,000 Registered Voters August 13-17, 2017 / N=1,000 Registered voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. Do you feel things in the country are going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track? 70% 69% 66% 66% 64% 65% 63% 64% 58% 30% 28% 26% 26% 27% 27% 28% 21% 21% 14% 11% 10% 8% 9% 8% 7% 6% 9% 3/20/2014 8/28/2014 12/11/2014 5/7/2015 4/20/2016 9/1/2016 10/13/2016 12/1/2016 8/17/2017 Right direction Unsure Wrong track Q1 August 13-17, 2017 / N=1,000 Registered voters/Split sample A/B/ ±3.1% M.O.E. Do you feel things in the country are going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track? 72% 75% 73% 70% 69% 67% 67% 65%66%66% 63%64% 63% 64% 62% 62% 61% 60% 59% 59% 59% 64% 58% 56% 57%56%57% 55% 55% 54% 54% 59% 54% 52% 51% 40% 41% 34% 40% 39% 38% 38% 39% 37% 37% 28% 36% 34% 28% 32% 32% 33%32% 26% 31% 31% 30% 29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 21%21% 26% 24% 6/1/04 8/1/0410/1/043/1/05 10/1/052/1/06 9/1/06 7/1/0912/1/094/8/10 8/1/109/21/1010/21/105/12/119/1/11 11/11/112/12/125/1/128/12/129/20/129/27/1210/18/1211/5/1212/6/1210/31/131/16/143/14/148/28/1412/11/145/7/154/20/169/1/16 10/13/1612/1/168/17/17 Right Direction Wrong Track Unsure Q1 August 13-17, 2017 / N=1,000 Registered voters / ±3.1% M.O.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Battleground 2014 (XLIII)
    Battleground 2014 (XLIII) FINAL STUDY #14107 THE TARRANCE GROUP and LAKE RESEARCH PARTNERS N = 1,000 Registered “likely” voters Margin of error + 3.1% Field Dates: January 12-16, 2014 Hello, I'm _______________ of The Tarrance Group, a national survey research firm. We're talking to people today about public leaders and issues facing us all. IF CELL CODE = “N”, ASK: May I please speak with the youngest (male/female) in the household who is registered to vote? IF CELL CODE = “Y”, ASK: CP-1. Do you currently live in (state from cell sample sheet)? Yes (CONTINUE TO CP-3) No (CONTINUE TO CP-2) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ IF “NO” IN CP-1, ASK: CP-2. In what state do you current reside? __________________________ (RECORD STATE NAME) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ IF CELL CODE = “Y”, ASK: CP-3. For your safety, are you driving right now? Yes (SCHEDULE CALL BACK) No _____________________________________________________________________________________________ A. Are you registered to vote in your state? IF "NO," ASK: Is there someone else at home who is registered to vote? (IF "YES," THEN ASK: MAY I SPEAK WITH HIM/HER?) Yes (CONTINUE) No (THANK AND TERMINATE) *=less than .5% 1 And… B. What is the likelihood of your voting in the elections for US Congress that will be held in November 2014-- are you extremely likely, very likely, somewhat likely, or not very likely at all to vote? Extremely Likely ..................................................... 60% (CONTINUE) Very Likely .............................................................. 27% Somewhat Likely ..................................................... 13% (THANK AND TERMINATE) Not Very Likely UNSURE (DNR) (UPELECT) C. Are you, or is anyone in your household, employed with an advertising agency, newspaper, television or radio station, or political campaign? Yes (THANK AND TERMINATE) No (CONTINUE) Now, thinking for a moment about things in the country-- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Spreading the Gospel of Climate Change: an Evangelical Battleground
    NEW POLITICAL REFORM NEW MODELS OF AMERICA PROGRAM POLICY CHANGE LYDIA BEAN AND STEVE TELES SPREADING THE GOSPEL OF CLIMATE CHANGE: AN EVANGELICAL BATTLEGROUND PART OF NEW AMERICA’S STRANGE BEDFELLOWS SERIES NOVEMBER 2015 #STRANGEBEDFELLOWS About the Authors About New Models of Policy Change Lydia Bean is author of The Politics New Models of Policy Change starts from the observation of Evangelical Identity (Princeton UP that the traditional model of foundation-funded, 2014). She is Executive Director of Faith think-tank driven policy change -- ideas emerge from in Texas, and Senior Consultant to the disinterested “experts” and partisan elites compromise PICO National Network. for the good of the nation -- is failing. Partisan polarization, technological empowerment of citizens, and heightened suspicions of institutions have all taken their toll. Steven Teles is an associate professor of political science at Johns Hopkins But amid much stagnation, interesting policy change University and a fellow at New America. is still happening. The paths taken on issues from sentencing reform to changes in Pentagon spending to resistance to government surveillance share a common thread: they were all a result of transpartisan cooperation. About New America By transpartisan, we mean an approach to advocacy in which, rather than emerging from political elites at the New America is dedicated to the renewal of American center, new policy ideas emerge from unlikely corners of politics, prosperity, and purpose in the Digital Age. We the right or left and find allies on the other side, who may carry out our mission as a nonprofit civic enterprise: an come to the same idea from a very different worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atlantic Return and the Payback of Evangelization
    Vol. 3, no. 2 (2013), 207-221 | URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-114482 The Atlantic Return and the Payback of Evangelization VALENTINA NAPOLITANO* Abstract This article explores Catholic, transnational Latin American migration to Rome as a gendered and ethnicized Atlantic Return, which is figured as a source of ‘new blood’ that fortifies the Catholic Church but which also profoundly unset- tles it. I analyze this Atlantic Return as an angle on the affective force of his- tory in critical relation to two main sources: Diego Von Vacano’s reading of the work of Bartolomeo de las Casas, a 16th-century Spanish Dominican friar; and to Nelson Maldonado-Torres’ notion of the ‘coloniality of being’ which he suggests has operated in Atlantic relations as enduring and present forms of racial de-humanization. In his view this latter can be counterbalanced by embracing an economy of the gift understood as gendered. However, I argue that in the light of a contemporary payback of evangelization related to the original ‘gift of faith’ to the Americas, this economy of the gift is less liberatory than Maldonado-Torres imagines, and instead part of a polyfaceted reproduc- tion of a postsecular neoliberal affective, and gendered labour regime. Keywords Transnational migration; Catholicism; economy of the gift; de Certeau; Atlantic Return; Latin America; Rome. Author affiliation Valentina Napolitano is an Associate Professor in the Department of Anthro- pology and the Director of the Latin American Studies Program, University of *Correspondence: Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, 19 Russell St., Toronto, M5S 2S2, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (3.0) Religion and Gender | ISSN: 1878-5417 | www.religionandgender.org | Igitur publishing Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 10:21:12AM via free access Napolitano: The Atlantic Return and the Payback of Evangelization Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Standards, Thresholds, and the Next Battleground of Climate Change Regulations
    Article Environmental Standards, Thresholds, and the Next Battleground of Climate Change Regulations Kimberly M. Castle† and Richard L. Revesz†† Introduction .......................................................................... 1350 I. Traditional Risk Assessment Models ............................. 1363 A. Carcinogens ............................................................... 1363 B. Noncarcinogens Other than Criteria Pollutants ..... 1371 II. Treatment of Criteria Pollutants ................................... 1377 A. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 ......................... 1378 B. Shift in the EPA’s Approach: A Case Study of Lead ....................................................................... 1383 C. Rejecting Thresholds and Calculating Benefits Below the NAAQS .................................................... 1391 III. Calculating Health Benefits from Particulate Matter Reductions Below the NAAQS ....................................... 1397 A. Scientific Basis .......................................................... 1400 B. Regulatory Treatment .............................................. 1409 C. Addressing Uncertainty ........................................... 1413 D. Adjusting Baselines .................................................. 1417 IV. Considering Co-Benefits ................................................. 1421 A. Co-Benefits and Indirect Costs ................................ 1424 B. The EPA’s Practice ................................................... 1427 † Research Scholar, Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Battleground 2016: New Game
    Battleground 2016: new game June 30, 2016 Methodology Battleground Survey of 2700 Likely 2016 Voters in 9 competitive presidential battleground states. This survey took place June 11 - 20. Respondents who voted in the 2012 election, 2014 election, or registered since the 2014 election were selected from the national voter file. Likely voters were determined based on stated intention of voting in 2016. Data shown in this deck is among all 2016 likely voters unless otherwise noted. Margin of error for the full sample = +/-1.89 percentage points at 95% confidence. Margin of error will be higher among subgroups. Respondents were divided equally among states (n=300) of Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Margin of error for each state sample= +/- 5.66 percentage points at 95% confidence. Margin of error will be higher among subgroups. Forty-nine percent of respondents were reached by cell phone, in order to account for ever-changing demographics and accurately sample the full electorate in each state. Regression analysis. A series of fractional logistic regressions were conducted to obtain the marginal effects of the explanatory variable (presidential vote) on outcome variables (associations, statement pairs), representing the change in outcome probabilities estimated for the explanatory variable, all else held equal. No causation is implied by these results. 1 State Breakdowns Senate Battleground: Arizona Diverse Target States: Florida* Arizona Florida Nevada Nevada North Carolina North Carolina Rustbelt Target States: Ohio Ohio New Hampshire New Hampshire Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Wisconsin Michigan Wisconsin *The Senate vote results were excluded in Florida where Senator Rubio had not yet announced his candidacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubed Circle Newsletter 241 – Consistency Is Hard
    Cubed Circle Newsletter 241 – Consistency is Hard As many of probably noticed, we have been posting late and sporadically for the last month. This was, obviously, not our intention, but with the second semester eating into my free time, staying up to date is a tall order. Even without the newsletter itself seeing weekly publication the site has still remained up to date on a weekly basis, thanks primarily to co-author Ben Carass, as well as guest writers Paul Cooke and Leslie Lee III. But, the newsletter has survived for well over 241 weeks, and will hopefully thrive in the years to come. I have attempted to make provisions for publishing related tasks which should minimize the risk of major delays (obviously there will be some regular delays, as this late issue can attest), but we have some fail safes in place in order to keep this to a minimum. With all of this said, we have a great issue for everyone this week with Paul Cooke discussing the Pro-Wrestling Only Greatest Wrestler Ever project and his personal experience with the poll, Ben covers the news including tons of results from Japan and the Lesnar USADA violation, the Mixed Bag returns with a look at comedy wrestling, Ricochet/Ospreay, and a potential WWE match of the year -- plus Ben also looks at last Sunday's Battleground show and the first RAW of the brand split (a very good show). Also, for those unaware, we now have an official Twitter account @CubedCircleWres allowing the banger to unprecedented highs at @BenCarass and @RyanClingman.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutral Ground Or Battleground? Hidden History, Tourism, and Spatial (In)Justice in the New Orleans French Quarter
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston American Studies Faculty Publication Series American Studies 2018 Neutral Ground or Battleground? Hidden History, Tourism, and Spatial (In)Justice in the New Orleans French Quarter Lynnell L. Thomas Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umb.edu/amst_faculty_pubs Part of the African American Studies Commons, Africana Studies Commons, American Studies Commons, and the Tourism Commons Neutral Ground or Battleground? Hidden History, Tourism, and Spatial (In)Justice in the New Orleans French Quarter Lynnell L. Thomas The National Slave Ship Museum will be the next great attraction for visitors and locals to experience. It will reconnect Americans to their complicated and rich history and provide a neutral ground for all of us to examine the costs of our country’s development. —LaToya Cantrell, New Orleans councilmember, 20151 In 2017, the city of New Orleans removed four monuments that paid homage to the city’s Confederate past. The removal came after contentious public de- bate and decades of intermittent grassroots protests. Despite the public process, details about the removal were closely guarded in the wake of death threats, vandalism, lawsuits, and organized resistance by monument supporters. Work- Lynnell L. Thomas is Associate Professor of American Studies at University of Massachusetts Boston. Research for this article was made possible by a grant from the College of the Liberal Arts Dean’s Research Fund, University of Massachusetts Boston. I would also like to thank Leon Waters for agreeing to be interviewed for this article. 1. In 2017, Cantrell was elected mayor of New Orleans; see “LaToya Cantrell Elected New Or- leans’ First Female Mayor,” http://www.nola.com/elections/index.ssf/2017/11/latoya_cantrell _elected_new_or.html.
    [Show full text]
  • CBS News 2016 Battleground Tracker Pennsylvania
    CBS News 2016 Battleground Tracker Pennsylvania Sample 1091 Likely Voters⇤ Conducted October 26-28, 2016 Margin of Error 3.7% ± 1. How likely is it that you will vote in the 2016 Presidential election in November? Already voted early or by mail . 4% Definitely will vote . .91% Probably will vote . 4% Maybe will vote . 1% Probably will not vote . 0% Definitely will not vote . 0% Don’tknow ...............................................................0% 2. When you vote, how do you think you will cast your ballot? Asked of respondents who have not yet voted In person on election day November 8th . 98% By mail ballot/absentee . 2% 3. Have you gotten the ballot but not yet returned it, or have you not received it yet? Asked of respondents intending to cast a ballot by mail Have not yet returned it . 32% Have not yet received it . 66% Already mailed it or dropped it off . .2% 4. How motivated do you feel to vote this year? Asked of respondents who have not already voted Very motivated, can’t wait to vote . .72% Somewhat motivated . 16% Not too motivated . 6% Not motivated, but I’ll do it anyway . .6% ⇤1100 registered voters total were interviewed. 1091 likely voters are included. 1 CBS News 2016 Battleground Tracker Pennsylvania 5. If the 2016 presidential election were being held today and the candidates were Hillary Clinton, the Democrat, and Donald Trump, the Republican, who would you vote for? Voters selecting someone else in the initial question were given a choice of a selection of third party candidates Hillary Clinton . .48% Donald Trump .
    [Show full text]