DOCSLIB.ORG

POLL RESULTS: Congressional Bipartisanship Nationwide and in Battleground States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
POLL RESULTS: Congressional Bipartisanship Nationwide and in Battleground States POLL RESULTS: Congressional Bipartisanship Nationwide and in Battleground States 1 Voters think Congress is dysfunctional and reject the suggestion that it is effective. Please indicate whether you think this word or phrase describes the United States Congress, or not. Nationwide Battleground Nationwide Independents Battleground Independents Dysfunctional 60 60 61 64 Broken 56 58 58 60 Ineffective 54 54 55 56 Gridlocked 50 48 52 50 Partisan 42 37 40 33 0 Bipartisan 7 8 7 8 Has America's best 3 2 3 interests at heart 3 Functioning 2 2 2 3 Effective 2 2 2 3 2 Political frustrations center around politicians’ inability to collaborate in a productive way. Which of these problems frustrates you the most? Nationwide Battleground Nationwide Independents Battleground Independents Politicians can’t work together to get things done anymore. 41 37 41 39 Career politicians have been in office too long and don’t 29 30 30 30 understand the needs of regular people. Politicians are politicizing issues that really shouldn’t be 14 13 12 14 politicized. Out political system is broken and doesn’t work for me. 12 15 12 12 3 Candidates who brand themselves as bipartisan will have a better chance of winning in upcoming elections. For which candidate for Congress would you be more likely to vote? A candidate who is willing to compromise to A candidate who will stay true to his/her get things done principles and not make any concessions NationwideNationwide 72 28 Nationwide Nationwide Independents Independents 74 26 BattlegroundBattleground 70 30 Battleground Battleground IndependentsIndependents 73 27 A candidate who will vote for bipartisan A candidate who will resist bipartisan legislation legislation and stick with his/her party NationwideNationwide 83 17 Nationwide IndependentsNationwide Independents 86 14 BattlegroundBattleground 82 18 Battleground BattlegroundIndependents Independents 88 12 4 Across the country, voters agree that they want members of Congress to work together. I want members of Congress to work together. Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree NET AGREE NationwideNationwide 78 18 96 Nationwide Nationwide Independents Independents 79 14 93 BattlegroundBattleground 77 19 96 Battleground 93 Battleground IndependentsIndependents 79 14 My member of Congress should work in a bipartisan fashion with other members of Congress. Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree NET AGREE NationwideNationwide 45 41 85 Nationwide Nationwide Independents 45 36 Independents 81 BattlegroundBattleground 46 42 88 Battleground Battleground Independents 49 37 Independents 87 5 Their constituents believe that members of Congress should work to find compromise on the big issues. In dealing with legislation on each of these issues, which comes closer to your view? Members of Congress should stick to their principles Members of Congress should work to find and not compromise with members of the other party. compromise with members of the other party. Building/Improving Roads and Bridges Health Care Tax Reform Education Policy and School Choice Minimum Wage Immigration Policy KEY Nationwide Privacy Nationwide Independents Gun Control/ Battleground 2nd Amendment Issues Battleground Open Internet/Net Neutrality Independents 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % close to view 6 Congressional leaders of both parties have negative favorability ratings. Party Leadership Favorability %Favorable/%Unfavorable Nationwide Battleground Nationwide Battleground Independents Independents Nancy Pelosi 28/54 15/59 27/54 16/58 Paul Ryan 28/54 24/48 28/55 23/50 Chuck Schumer 24/37 15/38 23/36 13/41 Mitch McConnell 13/55 9/49 11/56 9/52 7 Methodology Voters Global Strategy Group conducted an online survey of 3,666 interviews among registered voters, including 2,039 nationwide and 2,346 among registered voters in battleground states between October 3 and 11, 2017. Battleground states consisted of Florida, New Hampshire, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, North Dakota, and Montana. Voters considered to be independent were those who identified as independent and did not lean toward either party or indicated that they had split their tickets between Democratic and Republican candidates in recent national, statewide, and local elections. 8 New York Washington, DC Hartford Chicago Denver 215 Park Avenue South 1001 G Street NW 185 Asylum St 222 W. Ontario St. 1120 Lincoln Street 15th Floor 6th Floor East 16th Floor Suite 600 Suite 905 New York, NY 10003 Washington, DC 20001 Hartford, CT 06103 Chicago, IL 60654 Denver, CO 80203 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1990 NGA Annual Meeting
    BARLOW & JONES P.O. BOX 160612 MOBILE, ALABAMA 36616 (205) 476-0685 ~ 1 2 ACHIEVING EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE 3 AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 4 5 National Governors' Association 6 82nd Annual Meeting Mobile, Alabama 7 July 29-31, 1990 8 9 10 11 12 ~ 13 ..- 14 15 16 PROCEEDINGS of the Opening Plenary Session of the 17 National Governors' Association 82nd Annual Meeting, 18 held at the Mobile Civic Center, Mobile, Alabama, 19 on the 29th day of July, 1990, commencing at 20 approximately 12:45 o'clock, p.m. 21 22 23 ".~' BARLOW & JONES P.O. BOX 160612 MOBILE. ALABAMA 36616 (205) 476-0685 1 I N D E X 2 3 Announcements Governor Branstad 4 Page 4 5 6 Welcoming Remarks Governor Hunt 7 Page 6 8 9 Opening Remarks Governor Branstad 10 Page 7 11 12 Overview of the Report of the Task Force on Solid Waste Management 13 Governor Casey Governor Martinez Page 11 Page 15 14 15 Integrated Waste Management: 16 Meeting the Challenge Mr. William D. Ruckelshaus 17 Page 18 18 Questions and Discussion 19 Page 35 20 21 22 23 2 BARLOW & JONES P.O. BOX 160612 MOBILE, ALABAMA 36616 (205) 476-0685 1 I N D E X (cont'd) 2 Global Environmental Challenges 3 and the Role of the World Bank Mr. Barber B. Conable, Jr. 4 Page 52 5 Questions and Discussion 6 Page 67 7 8 Recognition of NGA Distinguished Service Award Winners 9 Governor Branstad Page 76 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 3 BARLOW & JONES P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Popular Culture Studies Journal
    THE POPULAR CULTURE STUDIES JOURNAL VOLUME 6 NUMBER 1 2018 Editor NORMA JONES Liquid Flicks Media, Inc./IXMachine Managing Editor JULIA LARGENT McPherson College Assistant Editor GARRET L. CASTLEBERRY Mid-America Christian University Copy Editor Kevin Calcamp Queens University of Charlotte Reviews Editor MALYNNDA JOHNSON Indiana State University Assistant Reviews Editor JESSICA BENHAM University of Pittsburgh Please visit the PCSJ at: http://mpcaaca.org/the-popular-culture- studies-journal/ The Popular Culture Studies Journal is the official journal of the Midwest Popular and American Culture Association. Copyright © 2018 Midwest Popular and American Culture Association. All rights reserved. MPCA/ACA, 421 W. Huron St Unit 1304, Chicago, IL 60654 Cover credit: Cover Artwork: “Wrestling” by Brent Jones © 2018 Courtesy of https://openclipart.org EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD ANTHONY ADAH FALON DEIMLER Minnesota State University, Moorhead University of Wisconsin-Madison JESSICA AUSTIN HANNAH DODD Anglia Ruskin University The Ohio State University AARON BARLOW ASHLEY M. DONNELLY New York City College of Technology (CUNY) Ball State University Faculty Editor, Academe, the magazine of the AAUP JOSEF BENSON LEIGH H. EDWARDS University of Wisconsin Parkside Florida State University PAUL BOOTH VICTOR EVANS DePaul University Seattle University GARY BURNS JUSTIN GARCIA Northern Illinois University Millersville University KELLI S. BURNS ALEXANDRA GARNER University of South Florida Bowling Green State University ANNE M. CANAVAN MATTHEW HALE Salt Lake Community College Indiana University, Bloomington ERIN MAE CLARK NICOLE HAMMOND Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota University of California, Santa Cruz BRIAN COGAN ART HERBIG Molloy College Indiana University - Purdue University, Fort Wayne JARED JOHNSON ANDREW F. HERRMANN Thiel College East Tennessee State University JESSE KAVADLO MATTHEW NICOSIA Maryville University of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Trump 41% 55% 4%
    August 13-17, 2017 / N=1,000 Registered voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. THE GEORGE WASHINGTON BATTLEGROUND POLL A national survey of 1,000 Registered Voters August 13-17, 2017 / N=1,000 Registered voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. Do you feel things in the country are going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track? 70% 69% 66% 66% 64% 65% 63% 64% 58% 30% 28% 26% 26% 27% 27% 28% 21% 21% 14% 11% 10% 8% 9% 8% 7% 6% 9% 3/20/2014 8/28/2014 12/11/2014 5/7/2015 4/20/2016 9/1/2016 10/13/2016 12/1/2016 8/17/2017 Right direction Unsure Wrong track Q1 August 13-17, 2017 / N=1,000 Registered voters/Split sample A/B/ ±3.1% M.O.E. Do you feel things in the country are going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track? 72% 75% 73% 70% 69% 67% 67% 65%66%66% 63%64% 63% 64% 62% 62% 61% 60% 59% 59% 59% 64% 58% 56% 57%56%57% 55% 55% 54% 54% 59% 54% 52% 51% 40% 41% 34% 40% 39% 38% 38% 39% 37% 37% 28% 36% 34% 28% 32% 32% 33%32% 26% 31% 31% 30% 29% 28% 28% 27% 27% 21%21% 26% 24% 6/1/04 8/1/0410/1/043/1/05 10/1/052/1/06 9/1/06 7/1/0912/1/094/8/10 8/1/109/21/1010/21/105/12/119/1/11 11/11/112/12/125/1/128/12/129/20/129/27/1210/18/1211/5/1212/6/1210/31/131/16/143/14/148/28/1412/11/145/7/154/20/169/1/16 10/13/1612/1/168/17/17 Right Direction Wrong Track Unsure Q1 August 13-17, 2017 / N=1,000 Registered voters / ±3.1% M.O.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservatives on Madison Avenue: Political Advertising and Direct Marketing in the 1950S
    NANZAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES Volume 41 (2019): 3-25 Conservatives on Madison Avenue: Political Advertising and Direct Marketing in the 1950s MORIYAMA Takahito ＊ This article investigates how urban consumerism affected the rise of modern American conservatism by focusing on anticommunists’ political advertising in New York City during the 1950s. The advertising industry developed the new tactic of direct marketing in the post-World War II period and, over the years, several political activists adopted this new marketing technique for political campaigns. Direct mail, a product of the new marketing, was a personalized medium that built up a database of personal information and sent suitable messages to individuals, instead of standardized information to the masses. The medium was especially significant for conservatives to disseminate their ideology to prospective supporters across the country in the 1950s when the conservati ve media establishment did not exist. This research explores the development of the American right in urban areas by analyzing the role of direct mail in the conservative movement. The postwar era witnessed the rise of modern American conservatism as a political movement. Following World War II, anticommunism became widespread among Americans and the United States was confronted with communism abroad, whereas in domestic politics right-wing movements, such as McCarthyism, attacked liberalism. The New Deal had angered many Americans prior to the 1950s. Frustrated with government regulations since the 1930s, some businesspeople acclaimed the free enterprise system and individual liberties as the American ideal; several intellectuals and religious figures criticized the decline of traditional values in modern society; and white Southerners were adamant in preventing the federal government from interfering in the Jim Crow laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Preferences for Bipartisanship in the American Electorate Laurel
    Compromise vs. Compromises: Preferences for Bipartisanship in the American Electorate Laurel Harbridge* Assistant Professor, Northwestern University Faculty Fellow, Institute for Policy Research [email protected] Scott Hall 601 University Place Evanston, IL 60208 (847) 467-1147 Neil Malhotra Associate Professor, Stanford Graduate School of Business [email protected] 655 Knight Way Stanford, CA 94035 (408) 772-7969 Brian F. Harrison PhD Candidate, Northwestern University [email protected] Scott Hall 601 University Place Evanston, IL 60208 * Corresponding author. We thank Time-Sharing Experiments in the Social Sciences (TESS) for providing the majority of the financial support of this project. TESS is funded by the National Science Foundation (SES- 0818839). A previous version of this paper was scheduled for presentation at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Abstract Public opinion surveys regularly assert that Americans want political leaders to work together and to engage in bipartisan compromise. If so, why has Congress become increasingly acrimonious even though the American public wants it to be “bipartisan”? Many scholars claim that this is simply a breakdown of representation. We offer another explanation: although people profess support for “bipartisanship” in an abstract sense, what they desire procedurally out of their party representatives in Congress is to not compromise with the other side. To test this argument, we conduct two experiments in which we alter aspects of the political context to see how people respond to parties (not) coming together to achieve broadly popular public policy goals. We find that citizens’ proclaimed desire for bipartisanship in actuality reflects self-serving partisan desires.
    [Show full text]
  • The XXI Century Socialism in the Context of the New Latin American Left Civilizar
    Civilizar. Ciencias Sociales y Humanas ISSN: 1657-8953 [email protected] Universidad Sergio Arboleda Colombia Ramírez Montañez, Julio The XXI century socialism in the context of the new Latin American left Civilizar. Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, vol. 17, núm. 33, julio-diciembre, 2017, pp. 97- 112 Universidad Sergio Arboleda Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=100254730006 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas 17 (33): 97-112, Julio-Diciembre de 2017 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22518/16578953.902 The XXI century socialism in the context of the new Latin American left1 El socialismo del siglo XXI en el contexto de la nueva izquierda latinoamericana Recibido: 27 de juniol de 2016 - Revisado: 10 de febrero de 2017 – Aceptado: 10 de marzo de 2017. Julio Ramírez Montañez2 Abstract The main purpose of this paper is to present an analytical approach of the self- proclaimed “new socialism of the XXI Century” in the context of the transformations undertaken by the so-called “Bolivarian revolution”.The reforms undertaken by referring to the ideology of XXI century socialism in these countries were characterized by an intensification of the process of transformation of the state structure and the relations between the state and society, continuing with the nationalization of sectors of the economy, the centralizing of the political apparatus of State administration.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY COMPETITION in the POLITICS INDUSTRY IS FAILING AMERICA a Strategy for Reinvigorating Our Democracy
    SEPTEMBER 2017 WHY COMPETITION IN THE POLITICS INDUSTRY IS FAILING AMERICA A strategy for reinvigorating our democracy Katherine M. Gehl and Michael E. Porter ABOUT THE AUTHORS Katherine M. Gehl, a business leader and former CEO with experience in government, began, in the last decade, to participate actively in politics—first in traditional partisan politics. As she deepened her understanding of how politics actually worked—and didn’t work—for the public interest, she realized that even the best candidates and elected officials were severely limited by a dysfunctional system, and that the political system was the single greatest challenge facing our country. She turned her focus to political system reform and innovation and has made this her mission. Michael E. Porter, an expert on competition and strategy in industries and nations, encountered politics in trying to advise governments and advocate sensible and proven reforms. As co-chair of the multiyear, non-partisan U.S. Competitiveness Project at Harvard Business School over the past five years, it became clear to him that the political system was actually the major constraint in America’s inability to restore economic prosperity and address many of the other problems our nation faces. Working with Katherine to understand the root causes of the failure of political competition, and what to do about it, has become an obsession. DISCLOSURE This work was funded by Harvard Business School, including the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness and the Division of Research and Faculty Development. No external funding was received. Katherine and Michael are both involved in supporting the work they advocate in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inside Look at the Obama Administration: Politics and Policy at the Six-Month Mark
    An Inside Look at the Obama Administration: Politics and Policy at the Six-Month Mark 1 DOUGLAS SCHOEN JUNE 30 T H , 2009 Overview 2 I spent six years between 1994 and 2000 as one of President Bill Clinton’s senior political advisers. During that time, we did an extensive amount of polling and research on issues facing the country. Many of the decisions that were made at the very least were informed by polling information. Overview 3 Tonight, I seek to provide a context for decisions that the Obama administration is making: why they are doing what they are doing, and how they are doing it. I will provide this context by examining a survey that I conducted over the weekend with 800 likely voters representing a national sample of the American population. Overview 4 This is a critical time for President Obama. Personally, Obama remains popular. His policies are somewhat less popular, and there is a substantial degree of skepticism as to whether these policies will actually create jobs, and large numbers of voters fear that they will increase the deficit. Americans are convinced that the Republicans caused the economic problems we currently face. However, there is a sense that Republican policies now are at least as constructive, if not more constructive, than Democratic policies. Overview 5 The electorate is supportive of Obama’s health care and cap-and-trade initiatives, but has doubts about the efficiency and impact of both. Voters also have a fear that new taxes will be created from Obama’s initiatives, and that another government bureaucracy will be created because of Obama’s health care plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning the American Dream: the Case for an Office of Opportunity
    Center on Children and Families at BROOKINGS May 2014 CCF Brief # 53 Planning the American Dream: The Case for an Office of Opportunity Richard V. Reeves Opportunity is a Bipartisan Issue U.S. politics is short on bipartisanship. But there is one issue on which the major players on both sides of the aisle are in agreement. Upward intergenerational mobility is too low—which is both a symptom and a cause of unfairness in American society. Take these two quotes, one from President Obama and the other from Representative Paul Ryan: “Upward mobility is the central promise of life in America: but right now, America’s engines of upward mobility aren’t working the way they should. “Opportunity is who we are… but upward mobility has stalled.” Hard to know which one is which, isn’t it? The first is Ryan, the second Obama. Rhetorical agreement that America ought to be a land of opportunity is, of course, hardly news. But it is significant that most senior political figures now agree that we are falling way short of this ideal. Mounting empirical evidence that rates of intergenerational social mobility in the U.S. are low and flat has finally penetrated the American political consciousness. A chance for some bipartisan work to address social mobility has presented itself. This is a precious moment, which ought to be seized. But even if the two sides agree there is a problem, they are very far from agreeing on any solution. Quite the opposite: while Democrats are pushing state action—pre-K education, Race to the Top in schools, a higher minimum wage, new metrics for college performance— Republicans emphasize wealth creation, trust, and civic capital in communities, and focus on reducing welfare rolls.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Battleground Nadine Sayegh, Mhadeen Barik, Bondokji Neven
    FROM BLADES TO BRAINS: A New Battleground Nadine Sayegh, Mhadeen Barik, Bondokji Neven To cite this version: Nadine Sayegh, Mhadeen Barik, Bondokji Neven. FROM BLADES TO BRAINS: A New Battle- ground. [Research Report] The WANA Institute; The Embassy of the Netherlands in Jordan. 2017. hal-02149254 HAL Id: hal-02149254 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02149254 Submitted on 6 Jun 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. FROM BLADES TO BRAINS: A New Battleground West Asia-North Africa Institute, December 2017 All content of this publication was produced by Dr Neven Bondokji, Barik Mhadeen, and Nadine Sayegh. This publication is generously supported with funds from the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This publication reflects the views of the authors only, and not necessarily that of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE The information in this publication may not be reproduced, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from the WANA Institute. For permission to reproduce the information in this publication, please contact the WANA Institute Communications Department at [email protected]. Published by the WANA Institute, Royal Scientific Society in Amman, Jordan Authors: Nadine Sayegh, Barik Mhadeen, Dr Neven Bondokji Editor: Alethea Osborne Design: Lien Santermans Cover image: Geralt (CC0) Printed in Amman, Jordan © 2017 WANA Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • WWE Battleground/Seth Rollins Predictions
    Is The Future Of Wrestling Now? WWE Battleground/Seth Rollins Predictions Author : When Seth Rollins first stabbed his brothers in “The Shield” in the back, he joined “The Authority” and proclaimed himself the Future of the WWE. Why shouldn’t he … He was on top of the world. He had the protection of Triple H and the rest of the stable, he had the Money in the Bank contract and then, he had the World Title. With the Championship came a bit of hubris for Rollins. That Hubris has caused him to alienate all who have been around to help him and protect him. He had made up with them before his big title match with Brock Lesnar at Battleground, giving J&J Security Apple Watches and a brand new Cadillac, and he gave Kane an Apple Watch and a trip to Hawaii. It seemed to work as they ALL had Rollin’s back when Lesnar showed up on RAW. But all that did was piss off the Beast. Lesnar then went and tore apart the Caddy and had it junked. While he was doing that he broke Jamie Noble’s arm and suplexed Joey Mercury through the windshield, putting them both out of action. Then last week on RAW, Lesnar dropped the steel steps on Kane’s ankle. That pissed Rollins off so much; he then yelled at Kane and jumped on his ankle. So you can cross off the Devil’s favorite Demon off of Rollins protection list heading into Battleground. So what IS going to happen to the “Future” of the WWE? Here is one mans informed opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Battleground' to Be Aired in 'Suplex City'?
    ‘Battleground’ to be aired in ‘Suplex City’? “With a pinfall victory on the challenger and not on the champion”, like the representative Paul Heyman for his client Brock Lesnar likes to put it, started the WWE World Heavyweight Championship reign of Seth Rollins this past March and is lasting till today. Despite winning the most prestigious trophy on the grandest stage of them all at Wrestlemania 31, Seth Rollins has made himself a much bigger enemy naming Brock Lesnar. Brock Lesnar, the men with the most feared and intimidating physic and attitude, who likes to settle his scores in his own painful way, that mostly leads to physical damage of any human being, who is voluntarily or inadvertently blocking the path of this dangerous creature. He is been called the Beast Incarnate and unceremoniously it is the best way to describe the endangerment coming from this men. But ever since losing the WWE World Heavyweight Championship at this year’s Wrestlemania in screwing fashion, Brock Lesnar has released and publicly displayed his frustration to higher plateaus. Superstars like Joe Mercury and Jamie Nobel (J&J Security), Kane (Director of Operations) and many more already got victimized by Brock Lesnar and suffered broken body parts and multiple surgeries. In fact the only Superstar he hasn’t got his hands on already is the current Champion Seth Rollins, who is called the Architect or the man, who never fails in elaborating a master plan, which aids him to push his career to greater levels. However to push his career this time, he needs to outperform and outsmart the obstacle Brock Lesnar, who will stop at nothing to deliver series of Back Suplexes, which will immediately put Seth Rollins to ‘Suplex City’, to ensure he won’t achieve his goal again.
    [Show full text]