The First Record of Family Selenopidae (Arachnida: Araneae)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Biogeography of the Caribbean Cyrtognatha Spiders Klemen Čandek1,6,7, Ingi Agnarsson2,4, Greta J
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Biogeography of the Caribbean Cyrtognatha spiders Klemen Čandek1,6,7, Ingi Agnarsson2,4, Greta J. Binford3 & Matjaž Kuntner 1,4,5,6 Island systems provide excellent arenas to test evolutionary hypotheses pertaining to gene fow and Received: 23 July 2018 diversifcation of dispersal-limited organisms. Here we focus on an orbweaver spider genus Cyrtognatha Accepted: 1 November 2018 (Tetragnathidae) from the Caribbean, with the aims to reconstruct its evolutionary history, examine Published: xx xx xxxx its biogeographic history in the archipelago, and to estimate the timing and route of Caribbean colonization. Specifcally, we test if Cyrtognatha biogeographic history is consistent with an ancient vicariant scenario (the GAARlandia landbridge hypothesis) or overwater dispersal. We reconstructed a species level phylogeny based on one mitochondrial (COI) and one nuclear (28S) marker. We then used this topology to constrain a time-calibrated mtDNA phylogeny, for subsequent biogeographical analyses in BioGeoBEARS of over 100 originally sampled Cyrtognatha individuals, using models with and without a founder event parameter. Our results suggest a radiation of Caribbean Cyrtognatha, containing 11 to 14 species that are exclusively single island endemics. Although biogeographic reconstructions cannot refute a vicariant origin of the Caribbean clade, possibly an artifact of sparse outgroup availability, they indicate timing of colonization that is much too recent for GAARlandia to have played a role. Instead, an overwater colonization to the Caribbean in mid-Miocene better explains the data. From Hispaniola, Cyrtognatha subsequently dispersed to, and diversifed on, the other islands of the Greater, and Lesser Antilles. Within the constraints of our island system and data, a model that omits the founder event parameter from biogeographic analysis is less suitable than the equivalent model with a founder event. -
A Preliminary Checklist of Spiders (Araneae: Arachnida) in Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India
Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 April 2016 | 8(4): 8703–8713 A preliminary checklist of spiders (Araneae: Arachnida) in Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India 1 2 ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) C.K. Adarsh & P.O. Nameer Communication Short ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 1,2 Centre for Wildlife Sciences, College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala 680656, India 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected] (corresponding author) OPEN ACCESS Abstract: A preliminary study was conducted to document spider the spiders are regarded as poisonous creatures, and the diversity in Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary, Idukki District, Kerala State in general perception about them among the people are southern India. The study was conducted from October to November 2012. A total of 101 species of spiders belonging to 65 genera from negative. But the fact is that very few spiders are actually 29 families were identified from the sanctuary. This accounted for poisonous and harmful to human beings (Mathew et 6.98% of Indian spider species, 17.81% of Indian spider genera and 48.33% of the spider families of India. The dominant families were al. 2009). However, the services these creature do to Lycosidae (11 species) and Araneidae (10). Two endemic genera of mankind by way of controlling pest species have been Indian spiders such as Annandaliella and Neoheterophrictus were well documented (Riechert & Lockley 1984; Tanaka found at Chinnar, each representing one species each, and belonging to the family Theraphosidae. A guild structure analysis of the spiders 1989; Bishop & Riechert 1990). Being a less charismatic revealed seven feeding guilds such as orb weavers, stalkers, ground species and the scarcity of biologists studying spiders, runners, foliage runners, sheet web builders, space web builders and studies on the spiders of India in general and Western ambushers. -
Spiders in Africa - Hisham K
ANIMAL RESOURCES AND DIVERSITY IN AFRICA - Spiders In Africa - Hisham K. El-Hennawy SPIDERS IN AFRICA Hisham K. El-Hennawy Arachnid Collection of Egypt, Cairo, Egypt Keywords: Spiders, Africa, habitats, behavior, predation, mating habits, spiders enemies, venomous spiders, biological control, language, folklore, spider studies. Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Africa, the continent of the largest web spinning spider known 1.2. Africa, the continent of the largest orb-web ever known 2. Spiders in African languages and folklore 2.1. The names for “spider” in Africa 2.2. Spiders in African folklore 2.3. Scientific names of spider taxa derived from African languages 3. How many spider species are recorded from Africa? 3.1. Spider families represented in Africa by 75-100% of world species 3.2. Spider families represented in Africa by more than 400 species 4. Where do spiders live in Africa? 4.1. Agricultural lands 4.2. Deserts 4.3. Mountainous areas 4.4. Wetlands 4.5. Water spiders 4.6. Spider dispersal 4.7. Living with others – Commensalism 5. The behavior of spiders 5.1. Spiders are predatory animals 5.2. Mating habits of spiders 6. Enemies of spiders 6.1. The first case of the species Pseudopompilus humboldti: 6.2. The second case of the species Paracyphononyx ruficrus: 7. Development of spider studies in Africa 8. Venomous spiders of Africa 9. BeneficialUNESCO role of spiders in Africa – EOLSS 10. Conclusion AcknowledgmentsSAMPLE CHAPTERS Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary There are 7935 species, 1116 genera, and 79 families of spiders recorded from Africa. This means that more than 72% of the known spider families of the world are represented in the continent, while only 19% of the described spider species are ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) ANIMAL RESOURCES AND DIVERSITY IN AFRICA - Spiders In Africa - Hisham K. -
A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)
Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views. -
A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature. -
Spider Diversity Along Altitudinal Gradient in Milam Valley Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Western Himalaya
1206 Indian Forester [October 2011] 1207 I PAPILIONIDAE SPIDER DIVERSITY ALONG ALTITUDINAL GRADIENT IN MILAM VALLEY NANDA DEVI BIOSPHERE RESERVE, WESTERN HIMALAYA 53 Common lineblue Prosotas nora (C.Felder) C 54 Pea blue Lampides boeticus (Linnaeus) VC SHAZIA QUASIN AND V.P.UNIYAL 55 Large oak blue Arhopoda amantes (Hewitson) C 56 Plum judy Abisara echerius (Stoll) VC Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248001 Uttarakhand. 57 Forget-me-not Catochrysops Strabo (Fabricius) C V Fam HESPIRIIDAE Introduction area falls under Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, the 58 Rice swift Borbo cinnare (Wallace) VC th World Heritage Site. Milam Glacier originates from the 59 Indian skipper Spialia galba (Fabricius) C Spiders are diverse groups of animals attaining 7 60 Common banded demon Notocrypta paralyos (Wood-Mason & de Niceville) C number in diversity (Nyffeler and Benz, 1980). They are slopes of Trishul peak and is the source of the Milam River 61 Dark palm dart Telicota ancilla (Herrich-Schaffer) R abundant generalist predators in terrestrial habitats and and a tributary of the Pindar River. Some areas along this 62 Common dartlet Oriens goloides (Moore) C are themselves an important food source for other valley towards Milam were semi-arid in nature. The area * New Record, VC-Very Common, C- Common, R-Rare animals and are a valuable component of ecosystem is rich and diverse in both floral and fauna species. The major vegetation types ranges from tropical moist Acknowledgements function (Wise, 1993). The knowledge on diversity and distribution of spiders in India is sparse as compared to deciduous Forests to alpine moist and semi arid pastures. -
Arachnida: Araneae) Del Centro-Norte De La Provincia De Corrientes, Argentina
NOTA BREVE: Lista preliminar de la araneofauna (Arachnida: Araneae) del Centro-Norte de la Provincia de Corrientes, Argentina Gilberto Avalos¹, Gonzalo D. Rubio¹, María E. Bar¹ & Miryam P. Damborsky¹ Resumen: Se presenta una lista preliminar de especies del Orden Araneae del Centro – NOTA BREVE: Norte de la Provincia de Corrientes, Argentina. Se capturaron ejemplares en Lista preliminar de la araneofauna 19 departamentos, los cuales se depositaron en la colección de la Cátedra de (Arachnida: Araneae) del Centro- Artrópodos de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales de la Universidad Norte de la Provincia de Corrientes, Nacional del Nordeste (CARTROUNNE). Se registran 76 especies Argentina pertenecientes a 53 géneros y 20 familias del Infraorden Araneomorphae. Se incluyen 30 nuevas citas de especies para la Provincia y 12 para la Argentina. Acorde a su carácter cosmopolita Kukulcania hibernalis y Gilberto Avalos Oecobius navus tienen una distribución amplia. Se proporciona la nómina de [email protected] las localidades y departamentos en los que fue colectada cada especie. 1. Cátedra de Artrópodos Palabras clave: Lista de especies, Araneae, Distribución, Corrientes, Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales y Agrimensura – U.N.N.E. Av. Libertad 5470 – (W 3404 AAS) Corrientes – Argentina A preliminary species checklist of spider (Arachnida: Araneae) from Center North of Corrientes province, Argentina. Abstract: A preliminary species checklist of Araneae from Center North of Corrientes Revista Ibérica de Aracnología province, Argentina, is presented. The specimens were collected in 19 ISSN: 1576 - 9518. departments and were deposited in the collection of Catedra de Artropodos, Dep. Legal: Z-2656-2000. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste Vol. -
A Troglomorphic Spider from Java (Araneae, Ctenidae, Amauropelma)
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 163: 1–11 (2012)A troglomorphic spider from Java (Araneae, Ctenidae, Amauropelma) 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.163.2265 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A troglomorphic spider from Java (Araneae, Ctenidae, Amauropelma) Jeremy Miller1,2,†, Cahyo Rahmadi3,‡ 1 Department of Entomology, Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis, Postbus 9517 2300RA Leiden, The Netherlands 2 Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA 3 Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jalan Raya Bogor km 46, Cibinong, 16911 West Java, Indonesia † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:3B8D159E-8574-4D10-8C2D-716487D5B4D8 ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F5B4B29A-101A-4E93-8899-B221758F0009 Corresponding author: Jeremy Miller ([email protected]), Cahyo Rahmadi ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. Jocqué | Received 20 October 2011 | Accepted 19 December 2011 | Published 9 January 2012 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:731E2CED-192A-499A-A308-A8B92EA27C29 Citation: Miller J, Rahmadi C (2012) A troglomorphic spider from Java (Araneae, Ctenidae, Amauropelma). ZooKeys 163: 1–11. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.163.2265 Abstract A new troglomorphic spider from caves in Central Java, Indonesia, is described and placed in the ctenid genus Amauropelma Raven, Stumkat & Gray, until now containing only species from Queensland, Aus- tralia. Only juveniles and mature females of the new species are known. We give our reasons for placing the new species in Amauropelma, discuss conflicting characters, and make predictions about the morphol- ogy of the as yet undiscovered male that will test our taxonomic hypothesis. -
The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Endemic Giant Tarantula
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of endemic giant tarantula, Lyrognathus crotalus (Araneae: Theraphosidae) and comparative analysis Vikas Kumar, Kaomud Tyagi *, Rajasree Chakraborty, Priya Prasad, Shantanu Kundu, Inderjeet Tyagi & Kailash Chandra The complete mitochondrial genome of Lyrognathus crotalus is sequenced, annotated and compared with other spider mitogenomes. It is 13,865 bp long and featured by 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs), and two ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs), 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), and a control region (CR). Most of the PCGs used ATN start codon except cox3, and nad4 with TTG. Comparative studies indicated the use of TTG, TTA, TTT, GTG, CTG, CTA as start codons by few PCGs. Most of the tRNAs were truncated and do not fold into the typical cloverleaf structure. Further, the motif (CATATA) was detected in CR of nine species including L. crotalus. The gene arrangement of L. crotalus compared with ancestral arthropod showed the transposition of fve tRNAs and one tandem duplication random loss (TDRL) event. Five plesiomophic gene blocks (A-E) were identifed, of which, four (A, B, D, E) retained in all taxa except family Salticidae. However, block C was retained in Mygalomorphae and two families of Araneomorphae (Hypochilidae and Pholcidae). Out of 146 derived gene boundaries in all taxa, 15 synapomorphic gene boundaries were identifed. TreeREx analysis also revealed the transposition of trnI, which makes three derived boundaries and congruent with the result of the gene boundary mapping. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference showed similar topologies and congruent with morphology, and previously reported multi-gene phylogeny. However, the Gene-Order based phylogeny showed sister relationship of L. -
Araneae (Spider) Photos
Araneae (Spider) Photos Araneae (Spiders) About Information on: Spider Photos of Links to WWW Spiders Spiders of North America Relationships Spider Groups Spider Resources -- An Identification Manual About Spiders As in the other arachnid orders, appendage specialization is very important in the evolution of spiders. In spiders the five pairs of appendages of the prosoma (one of the two main body sections) that follow the chelicerae are the pedipalps followed by four pairs of walking legs. The pedipalps are modified to serve as mating organs by mature male spiders. These modifications are often very complicated and differences in their structure are important characteristics used by araneologists in the classification of spiders. Pedipalps in female spiders are structurally much simpler and are used for sensing, manipulating food and sometimes in locomotion. It is relatively easy to tell mature or nearly mature males from female spiders (at least in most groups) by looking at the pedipalps -- in females they look like functional but small legs while in males the ends tend to be enlarged, often greatly so. In young spiders these differences are not evident. There are also appendages on the opisthosoma (the rear body section, the one with no walking legs) the best known being the spinnerets. In the first spiders there were four pairs of spinnerets. Living spiders may have four e.g., (liphistiomorph spiders) or three pairs (e.g., mygalomorph and ecribellate araneomorphs) or three paris of spinnerets and a silk spinning plate called a cribellum (the earliest and many extant araneomorph spiders). Spinnerets' history as appendages is suggested in part by their being projections away from the opisthosoma and the fact that they may retain muscles for movement Much of the success of spiders traces directly to their extensive use of silk and poison. -
Arachnides 88
ARACHNIDES BULLETIN DE TERRARIOPHILIE ET DE RECHERCHES DE L’A.P.C.I. (Association Pour la Connaissance des Invertébrés) 88 2019 Arachnides, 2019, 88 NOUVEAUX TAXA DE SCORPIONS POUR 2018 G. DUPRE Nouveaux genres et nouvelles espèces. BOTHRIURIDAE (5 espèces nouvelles) Brachistosternus gayi Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Chili) Brachistosternus philippii Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Chili) Brachistosternus misti Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Pérou) Brachistosternus contisuyu Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Pérou) Brachistosternus anandrovestigia Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Pérou) BUTHIDAE (2 genres nouveaux, 41 espèces nouvelles) Anomalobuthus krivotchatskyi Teruel, Kovarik & Fet, 2018 (Ouzbékistan, Kazakhstan) Anomalobuthus lowei Teruel, Kovarik & Fet, 2018 (Kazakhstan) Anomalobuthus pavlovskyi Teruel, Kovarik & Fet, 2018 (Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan) Ananteris kalina Ythier, 2018b (Guyane) Barbaracurus Kovarik, Lowe & St'ahlavsky, 2018a Barbaracurus winklerorum Kovarik, Lowe & St'ahlavsky, 2018a (Oman) Barbaracurus yemenensis Kovarik, Lowe & St'ahlavsky, 2018a (Yémen) Butheolus harrisoni Lowe, 2018 (Oman) Buthus boussaadi Lourenço, Chichi & Sadine, 2018 (Algérie) Compsobuthus air Lourenço & Rossi, 2018 (Niger) Compsobuthus maidensis Kovarik, 2018b (Somaliland) Gint childsi Kovarik, 2018c (Kénya) Gint amoudensis Kovarik, Lowe, Just, Awale, Elmi & St'ahlavsky, 2018 (Somaliland) Gint gubanensis Kovarik, Lowe, Just, Awale, Elmi & St'ahlavsky, -
A Reconsideration of the Classification of the Spider Infraorder Mygalomorphae (Arachnida: Araneae) Based on Three Nuclear Genes and Morphology
A Reconsideration of the Classification of the Spider Infraorder Mygalomorphae (Arachnida: Araneae) Based on Three Nuclear Genes and Morphology Jason E. Bond1*, Brent E. Hendrixson2, Chris A. Hamilton1, Marshal Hedin3 1 Department of Biological Sciences and Auburn University Museum of Natural History, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America, 2 Department of Biology, Millsaps College, Jackson, Mississippi, United States of America, 3 Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America Abstract Background: The infraorder Mygalomorphae (i.e., trapdoor spiders, tarantulas, funnel web spiders, etc.) is one of three main lineages of spiders. Comprising 15 families, 325 genera, and over 2,600 species, the group is a diverse assemblage that has retained a number of features considered primitive for spiders. Despite an evolutionary history dating back to the lower Triassic, the group has received comparatively little attention with respect to its phylogeny and higher classification. The few phylogenies published all share the common thread that a stable classification scheme for the group remains unresolved. Methods and Findings: We report here a reevaluation of mygalomorph phylogeny using the rRNA genes 18S and 28S, the nuclear protein-coding gene EF-1c, and a morphological character matrix. Taxon sampling includes members of all 15 families representing 58 genera. The following results are supported in our phylogenetic analyses of the data: (1) the Atypoidea (i.e., antrodiaetids, atypids, and mecicobothriids) is a monophyletic group sister to all other mygalomorphs; and (2) the families Mecicobothriidae, Hexathelidae, Cyrtaucheniidae, Nemesiidae, Ctenizidae, and Dipluridae are not monophyletic. The Microstigmatidae is likely to be subsumed into Nemesiidae.