COUNTRY QUALIFICATION AAA AAB ABB N/A International Baccalaureate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

COUNTRY QUALIFICATION AAA AAB ABB N/A International Baccalaureate Undergraduate A-level Equivalencies COUNTRY QUALIFICATION AAA AAB ABB N/A International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma 32 with 666 at HL 32 with 665 at HL 32 with 655 HL European Baccalaureate 84% with 9 in relevant subjects 80% 77% Study Group Royal Holloway International Foundation Year 75% 70% 65% Cambridge Education Group Foundation Programme (CATS, OnCampus) AAA (Major modules) AAB (Major modules) ABB (Major modules) University of London International Foundation Programme (Also offered by Oncampus butDisctinction different (70%) grading system) Merit (65%) Merit (65%) David Game College A overall B overall B overall Bellerbys College 75% 70% 65% BTEC D*D*D* with AAAAA D*DD with AAABB DDD with AAABBB Please check directly with the Admissions team by emailing All other foundation programmes [email protected] Azerbaijan Students require foundation N/A Austria Reifezeugnis/Maturazeugnis 1 1.5 2 Bahrain Students require foundation N/A Bangladesh Students require foundation N/A Belgium 8/10 or 18/20 8/10 or 17/20 7/10 or 16/20 Certificate D Enseignement Secondaire Superieur or Diploma van Hoger Secundair Onderwijs Brazil Students require UK foundation N/A Brunei Students require UK Foundation N/A Bulgaria Diploma za Sredno Obrazovanie 5.7 5.6 5.5 Canada Canadian High School Diploma 85%+ 83% 80% Chile Students require UK Foundation N/A China Students require UK Foundation N/A Colombia Students require UK Foundation N/A France Baccalaureat 14/20 13/20 13/20 Ghana Students require UK Foundation N/A Germany Abitur 1.3 1.5 1.7 Greece average of 19 in Apolytirion with AB at A-level or average of 19 in Apolytirion with 19 in average of 18.5 in Apolytirion with BB at A-level or average of 18.5 in average of 18 in Apolytirion with BB at A-level or average of 18 in Apolytirion of Lykeion two Panhellenic exams Apolytirion with 18 in two Panhellic exams Apolytirion with 18 in two Panhellenic exams Hong Kong 5 5 5 (if Maths is a subject requirement, 5* in compulsory Maths + 5 extended Maths are 5 5 4 (if Maths is a subject requirement, 5 in compulsory Maths + 5 extended 5 5 5 (if Maths is a subject requirement, 5 in compulsory Maths + 5 Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education required) Maths are required) extended Maths are required) India HSSSC/AISSC 85%+ 80% 80% Iran High School Diploma Students require UK foundation Pre University Certificate 16/20 equivalent or 80% 16/20 equivalent or 80% 16/20 equivalent or 80% Italy Esame di Stato 90 90 85 Japan Students require UK foundation N/A Kazakhstan Students require UK foundation N/A Kenya Students require UK foundation N/A Kuwait Students require UK foundation N/A Libya Students require UK foundation N/A Malaysia STPM AAA AAB ABB Mexico Students requireUK foundation N/A Netherlands Voorbereidend Wetenschappelijk Onderwijs (VWO) (Gymnasium A/B and Atheneum A/B) 8 8 7 Diplomas (university preparatory education) Nigeria Students require UK foundation N/A Norway Norwegian Vitnemal 5 average 4 plust 5 in at least 1 related subject 4 plust 5 in at least 1 related subject Oman Students require UK foundation N/A Pakistan Students require UK foundation N/A Poland Swiadectwo Dojrzalosci / Matura 80% overall including 80% in three extended level subjects 75% overall including 75% in three extended level subjects 75% overall including 70% in three extended level subjects Qatar Students require UK foundation N/A Romania Diploma de Bacalaureat 9 8 8 Russia Students require UK foundation N/A Saudi Arabia Students require UK foundation N/A Singapore Singapore/ Cambridge GCE A-levels AAA/AAA AAB ABB South Korea Students require UK foundation N/A Spain Curso de Orientación Universitaria (COU) / Título de Bachillerato 8 8 7.5 Switzerland Maturitatszeugnis 5/6 5/6 5/6 French speaking - Maturite Cantonale très bien très bien très bien German speaking - Kantonale Maturitat sehr gut sehr gut sehr gut Italian speaking - Maturita Cantonale molto bene molto bene molto bene Taiwan Students requireUK foundation N/A Thailand Students require QM/UK foundation N/A Turkey Devlet Lise Diploması/ High School Diploma or QM/UK foundation 80% or 5 80% or 5 75% or 4 UAE Students require UK foundation N/A Ukraine Students require UK foundation N/A USA High School Diploma + Advanced Placement tests 5 in two AP tests 4 in two AP tests 4 in two AP tests or SATs (Old) - 1800 SAT 1 tests with 650 in two SAT 2 tests, PLUS a score of 650 in two or SATs (Old) - 1800 SAT 1 tests with 600 in two SAT 2 tests PLUS a score of or SATs (Old) - 1800 SAT 1 tests with 600 in two SAT 2 tests PLUS a SAT II tests 600 in two SAT II tests score of 600 in two SAT II tests or SATs (New) - 1200 in SAT 1 tests and 666 in the Essay PLUS a score of 650 in two SAT or SATs (New) - 1200 in SAT 1 tests and 666 in the Essay PLUS a score of 600 or SATs (New) - 1200 in SAT 1 tests and 666 in the Essay PLUS a score II tests in two SAT II tests of 600 in two SAT II tests or ACT with 28 overall or ACT with 28 overall or ACT with 28 overall Vietnam Students require UK foundation N/A.
Recommended publications
  • Gaokao Admission
    University of San Francisco Gaokao Admission Frequently Asked Questions What is Gaokao Direct Admission? USF offers a special, accelerated admission procedure for Chinese students who have achieved excellent Gaokao scores. Applicants will be admitted to USF based solely on their Gaokao test scores and a one-on-one interview with University staff, designed to evaluate English proficiency. There are no other admission requirements. Interviews in July enable students to begin their education in America immediately– –without spending an extra year preparing for IELTS, TOEFL or SAT tests. Interviews begin in mid-July, applicants receive their results within 24 hours of the interview, and formal admission letters are sent within a week. Students therefore have enough time to apply for F-1 student visas, and can attend USF in the Fall (August) Semester. Students who qualify in July can postpone their admission to the following Spring (January) Semester, if they prefer. Interviews are also held in late November or early December each year. Students who complete these interviews successfully can enter USF in the Spring (January) Semester or the next Fall (August) Semester. Why is USF doing this? For many decades, USF and the City of San Francisco have welcomed students from China. Our Chinese alumni have done very well in life after USF, both professionally and personally. Current Gaokao and other Chinese students enrich the educational experience of international and domestic students, alike; all benefit from the international network of friends made and colleagues introduced here at USF. Over the past few years, we have seen a steady increase in the academic ability and achievements of Chinese applicants to USF.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment for Qualification and Certification in Upper Secondary Education: a Stefanie Dufaux Review of Country Practices and Research Evidence
    OECD Education Working Papers No. 83 Assessment for Qualification and Certification in Upper Secondary Education: A Stefanie Dufaux Review of Country Practices and Research Evidence https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k92zp1cshvb-en Unclassified EDU/WKP(2012)20 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 04-Sep-2012 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR EDUCATION Unclassified EDU/WKP(2012)20 ASSESSMENT FOR QUALIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION IN UPPER SECONDARY EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF COUNTRY PRACTICES AND RESEARCH EVIDENCE OECD Education Working Paper No. 83 by Stefanie Dufaux This paper was prepared by Stefanie Dufaux, who joined the OECD Directorate for Education in September 2010 as a Carlo Schmid Fellow, and worked as a Consultant in the Education and Training Policy Division until July 2011. This paper is part of the work undertaken by the OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes. The OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes is designed to respond to the strong interest in evaluation and assessment issues evident at national and international levels. The overall purpose is to explore how systems of evaluation and assessment can be used to improve the quality, equity and efficiency of school education. The Review looks at the various components of assessment and evaluation frameworks that countries use with the objective of improving student outcomes. These include student assessment, teacher appraisal, school assessment and system evaluation. More information is available at: www.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy. Contacts: Ms. Deborah Nusche [Tel: +33(0) 1 45 24 78 01; e-mail: [email protected]] and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Heather L. Reid1 Plato's Gymnastic Dialogues2 It Is Not Mere
    Heather L. Reid Heather L. Reid1 adjacent to the Academy gymnasium in Athens, and he may have Plato’s Gymnastic Dialogues2 held the public office of Gymnasiarch there.5 In this essay, I would like to argue that there are also symbolic reasons for Plato setting It is not mere coincidence that several of Plato’s dialogues are some of his dialogues in gymnasia. These dialogues function as set in gymnasia and palaistrai (wrestling schools), employ the virtual gymnasia in which readers are coached by the character of gymnastic language of stripping, wrestling, tripping, even helping Socrates toward an innovative ideal of aretē (virtue, excellence). opponents to their feet, and imitate in argumentative form the Aretē and the Gymnasium athletic contests (agōnes) commonly associated with that place. The Taking the last claim first, we must remember that aretē’s main explanation for this is, of course, historical. Sophists, orators, oldest associations were with athleticism. Gods such as Zeus and and intellectuals of all stripes, including the historical Socrates, Hermes, and heroes such as Heracles and Achilles, were endowed really did frequent Athens’ gymnasia and palaistrai in search of with the strength and beauty that athletes strove to emulate. ready audiences and potential students.3 Perhaps they were Unlike mere mortals, however, gods and heroes never trained— following the example of Pythagoras, who may have been a boxing their aretē derived directly from their full or partial divinity, and it coach (gymnastēs) and was, in any case, associated with the was naturally accompanied by wisdom and eloquence. The beauty extraordinary Olympic success of athletes from his adopted and athleticism of aristocratic mortals was likewise attributed to Croton—success so great it generated the saying that the last of the divine heredity and thought to require no special training.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese University Entrance Examination Problems in Mathematics
    Japanese University Entrance Examination Problems in Mathematics Edited by Ling-Erl Eileen T. Wu Mathematical Association of America Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................3 1990 University Entrance Center Examination (UECE) ...............................................................4 Results of Performance on 1990 UECE ..............................................................................7 Evaluation of 1990 University Entrance Center Examination (UECE) I. Opinions of and Evaluations by Senior High School Teachers 1. Preface ....................................................................................................7 2. Content and Scope of the Exam Problems .....................................................................8 3. Analysis of the Exam Problems ..............................................................................9 4. Summary .................................................................................................10 II. Analysis by Division of Research, Senior High School Division, Association of Japanese Mathematical Education 1. Guidelines for Exam Problems ..............................................................................11 2. On This Year’s Problems ...................................................................................11 3. Students’ Group Divisions and Performances .................................................................11 4. Content and Intent of Math
    [Show full text]
  • European School, Copenhagen (Denmark) Approved by the Board of Governors at the Meeting on 1-3 December 2020 – Online
    Schola Europaea / Office of the Secretary-General Ref.: 2020-09-D-31-en-4 Orig.:EN Dossier of Conformity, S6-S7: European School, Copenhagen (Denmark) Approved by the Board of Governors at the meeting on 1-3 December 2020 – Online N.B. The OSG will already possess a large amount of essential information, from the N-s5 DoC and previous audits, so this DoC is exclusively related to the Baccalaureate level. Section 1: General information a. Contact information School name European School Copenhagen (ESCPH) Address Ny Carlsberg Vej 99, DK-1799 Copenhagen, Denmark Phone +45 3614 0190 Email [email protected] Website www.escph.dk b. School status State ☒ State and City of Copenhagen Private (please provide details) ☐ Mixed (please provide details) ☐ Explain briefly how the school is positioned within the national school network of the member state requesting the accreditation: The European School Copenhagen is a public school, funded by the Municipality of Copenhagen for the operational costs for primary and lower secondary education (N-S4) and by the Danish State for the upper secondary education (S5-S7). The European School Copenhagen is a part of Sankt Annæ Gymnasium which consists of a primary school department, a choir school department and a high school department (Gymnasium in Danish). Sankt Annæ Campus (including ESCPH) is managed by a Campus Principal and a “Campus Board”. The Head of the European School Copenhagen is in collaboration with the principal of Sankt Annæ Campus (who holds the overall responsibility) responsible for running ESCPH, and the Board of the European School Copenhagen is represented in the Campus Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Diploma Equivalency List
    Diploma equivalency list International applicants should have a foreign equivalent of the Dutch VWO-Diploma (pre-university education). You can check whether your diploma meets this requirement in this diploma equivalency list. Please note that this does not guarantee admission, nor can you derive rights from this list. Note as well that, depending on the Bachelor’s programme of your choice, subject-specific requirements and/or language requirements may apply. Please refer to the webpages of the Bachelor's programme of your choice for detailed information. If your diploma is not listed, it may still be an equivalent of the Dutch VWO-Diploma, but additional requirements regarding subjects taken and grades obtained may apply. For details, please feel free to contact the Admissions Office. Country Name Diploma Albania Diplomë e Maturës Shtetërore Aruba Arubaans VWO-Diploma Austria Reifeprüfungszeugnis or Reife- und Diplomprüfungszeugnis Belgium (Flanders) Diploma van Secundair Onderwijs, Algemeen Secundair Onderwijs (ASO); TSO and KSO to be checked on an individual basis Belgium (Wallonia) Certificat d'Enseignement Secondaire Supérieur, Enseignement Général Bosnia and Herzegovina Diploma o Položenom Maturskom Ispitu (RS)/Diploma o Završenoj Srednjoj školi (FiBH)(Secondary School Leaving Diploma) Bulgaria Diploma za Sredno Obrazovanie Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Examinations (CAPE): CAPE is Examinations (CAPE) required with three double units (Unit 1 + 2) in three general/academic subjects Croatia Maturalna
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education Entrance Qualifications and Exams in Europe: a Comparison
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES CULTURE AND EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION ENTRANCE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXAMS IN EUROPE: A COMPARISON STUDY This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Culture and Education. AUTHORS Cecile Hoareau McGrath, Marie Louise Henham, Anne Corbett, Niccolo Durazzi, Michael Frearson, Barbara Janta, Bregtje W. Kamphuis, Eriko Katashiro, Nina Brankovic, Benoit Guerin, Catriona Manville, Inga Schwartz, Daniel Schweppenstedde RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Markus J. Prutsch Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE Lyna Pärt LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Translation: DE, FR ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in May 2014 Brussels © European Union, 2014 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES CULTURE AND EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION ENTRANCE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXAMS IN EUROPE: A COMPARISON STUDY Abstract The study analyses admission systems to higher education across ten countries, covering some countries of the European Union (France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom), a candidate country (Turkey) as well as commonly used international comparators (Australia, Japan and the US).
    [Show full text]
  • European-Baccalaureate.Pdf
    The European Baccalaureate Information for admissions officers of universities and other higher education institutions July 2013 European Schools Mission Statement “Educated side by side, untroubled from infancy by divisive prejudices, acquainted with all that is great and good in the different cultures, it will be borne upon them as they mature that they belong together. Without ceasing to look to their own lands with love and pride, they will become in mind Europeans, schooled and ready to complete and consolidate the work of their fathers before them, to bring into being a united and thriving Europe.” Jean Monnet 1953 2 Contents The European Baccalaureate – An Overview 4 Section 1: The Schools 6 Section 2: The Students 7 Section 3: The Curriculum 8 Section 4: Assessment 10 Section 5: Examination Results 11 Section 6: English Language in the European Baccalaureate 12 Section 7: Mathematics 14 Section 8: UCAS Application Form and Offers 16 Appendix 1: Further Information Sources and Useful Addresses 18 Appendix 2: European Baccalaureate Scores and Degree Performance 19 Appendix 3: European Baccalaureate to ‘A’ Level Conversion Table 22 Appendix 4: Case Studies 24 3 The European Baccalaureate – An Overview Aim The aim of this document is to summarise the key elements of the European Baccalaureate (EB), mainly to assist admissions officers at universities and other institutions of higher education in the United Kingdom. It will however also be of interest to parents and potential employers, and is issued by the Department for Education, replacing the guidance produced in 2009. Introduction The EB is the school-leaving examination for students who attend one of the European Schools.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between AP® Exam Performance and College Outcomes
    RESEaRch REpoRt 2009-4 The Relationship Between AP® Exam Performance and College Outcomes By Krista D. Mattern, Emily J. Shaw, and Xinhui Xiong VALIDITY College Board Research Report No. 2009-4 The Relationship Between AP® Exam Perfomance and College Outcomes Krista D. Mattern, Emily J. Shaw, and Xinhui Xiong The College Board, New York, 2009 Krista D. Mattern is an associate research scientist at the College Board. Emily J. Shaw is an assistant research scientist at the College Board Xinhui Xiong was a graduate student intern at the College Board. Researchers are encouraged to freely express their professional judgment. Therefore, points of view or opinions stated in College Board Reports do not necessarily represent official College Board position or policy. About the College Board The College Board is a mission-driven not-for-profit organization that connects students to college success and opportunity. Founded in 1900, the College Board was created to expand access to higher education. Today, the membership association is made up of more than 5,900 of the world’s leading educational institutions and is dedicated to promoting excellence and equity in education. Each year, the College Board helps more than seven million students prepare for a successful transition to college through programs and services in college readiness and college success — including the SAT® and the Advanced Placement Program®. The organization also serves the education community through research and advocacy on behalf of students, educators and schools. For further information, visit www.collegeboard.org. © 2009 The College Board. College Board, Advanced Placement Program, AP, SAT and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of the College Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for IB Students Applying to US Institutions
    Guide for IB students applying to US institutions This guide provides a brief introduction to the US higher education system and its application process, as well as information specifically relevant to IB students applying to US institutions from outside of the US. The US context search opportunities and classes in a wide variety of fields of study. Because of the high number of faculty research More than 4,500 accredited institutions make up higher grants, public institutions tend to have large departments education in the US. Unlike in many countries, US higher offering a variety of degrees. These institutions tend to education institutions are not centrally organized or man- be very large and, because of government subsidies, are aged, but are autonomous and accredited by indepen- typically less expensive to attend than private institutions. dent regional bodies. Private institutions receive the majority or entirety of Bachelor’s degrees their funding from alumni donations, faculty research grants and tuition fees. This typically makes them more The bachelor’s degree is the main undergraduate degree expensive to attend, but allows for more resources avail- type at US universities and colleges. It is usually complet- able to students. ed in four years of full-time study and is awarded after completing a specified number of credits in a major field. Liberal arts institutions offer courses in the arts, hu- Students typically earn credits for courses they take, and manities, languages, mathematics and social and phys- these credits count towards the completion of a pro- ical sciences. The majority of liberal arts institutions are gramme.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany and Austria
    Credentials Evaluation Service Germany and Austria Sprechen Sie Deutsch? How Not to Be Overwhelmed by Credentials in German Presented at the 2012 NAFSA (Association of International Educators) Region XII Conference in San Jose, CA. Presenters: Andrej Molchan, Senior Evaluator Emily Tse, Director of Evaluations This session covered the rich educational systems of Germany and Austria, including the complex vocational and technical offerings which they offer. The presentation also addressed recent reforms and common areas of confusion, by breaking down their educational pathways and terminology. Sprechen Sie Deutsch? How Not to be Overwhelmed by Credentials in German NAFSA XII October 24, 2012 Introduction Presenters: - Andrej Molchan Evaluator - Emily Tse Director of Evaluations Educational Systems: Germany and Austria -Austria annexed in 1938 -Gained independence in 1955 Background • Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Federal Republic of Germany) • Reunification in 1990 • 16 Bundesländer (Federal States) • Population of over 80 million Accreditation • Education is governed by each of the 16 federal states • Coordinated by the federal government through the Kultusministerskonferenz (Cultural Ministers’ Conference) • University documents are issued by the post-secondary institution (with the exception of law, teaching, and medicine) • Since 2002, all new degree programs are accredited by one of the accreditation bodies regulated by the Akkreditierungsrat (Accreditation Council) • Recognition of higher education institutions and degree programs
    [Show full text]
  • Sistema De Acceso a La Universidad Española
    Sistema de acceso a la universidad española Rocío Villaverde Carnevali Directora Técnica Esta foto de Autor desconocido está bajo licencia CC BY-NC-ND Procedimiento de Acceso 1. Los distritos universitarios aceptan exclusivamente la acreditación de la UNED en el procedimiento de acceso para estudiantes tipo UE. 2. Consecuencia: en el marco jurídico actual no cabe la posibilidad de hacer exámenes de acceso. (En el marco jurídico de la Selectividad o de la LOMCE sí era posible) 3. La Calificación de Acceso a la Universidad (CAU) podrá alcanzar un máximo de 10 puntos, que resultan de la nota del título de Abitur convertida a una escala numérica de 0 a 10 mediante una fórmula matemática. 4. La Nota de Admisión podrá alcanzar hasta 14 puntos y se obtendrá a través de la suma: de la CAU y de la utilización de otros parámetros, que veremos más adelante y que no son iguales en todos los distritos universitarios. ¿Qué es UNEDasiss? ¿A quién se dirige? • UNEDassis es un servicio de la UNED creado para la gestión del acceso y de la admisión de estudiantes a las universidades españolas. • Está especialmente dirigido a los estudiantes internacionales, entre otros a los estudiantes de la Unión Europea con convenio de reciprocidad en materia de acceso a las universidades. Sistemas Educativos incluidos en este apartado: Alemania, Andorra, Austria, Bachillerato Internacional, Bélgica, Bulgaria, Chequia, China, Chipre, Croacia, Dinamarca, Escuelas Europeas, Eslovaquia, Eslovenia, Estonia, Finlandia, Francia, Grecia, Hungría, Irlanda, Islandia, Italia, Letonia, Liechtenstein, Lituania, Luxemburgo, Malta, Noruega, Países Bajos, Polonia, Portugal, Reino Unido, Rumania, Suecia y Suiza.
    [Show full text]