DOCSLIB.ORG

National Qualifications Framework Developments in Europe 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ENENEN NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENTS IN EUROPE 2017 National qualifications framework developments in Europe 2017 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 Please cite this publication as: Cedefop (2018). National qualifications framework developments in Europe 2017. Luxembourg: Publications Office. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/029873 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 Copyright © European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), 2018 All rights reserved. PRINT ISBN: 78-92-896-2649-1 doi:10.2801/545730 TI-01-18-117-EN-C PDF ISBN: 978-92-896-2650-7 doi:10.2801/029873 TI-01-18-117-EN-N Designed by Missing Element Prague Printed in the European Union The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) is the European Union’s reference centre for vocational education and training. We provide information on and analyses of vocational education and training systems, policies, research and practice. Cedefop was established in 1975 by Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75. Europe 123, 570 01 Thessaloniki (Pylea), GREECE PO Box 22427, 551 02 Thessaloniki, GREECE Tel. +30 2310490111, Fax +30 2310490020 E-mail: [email protected] www.cedefop.europa.eu Joachim James Calleja, Director Tatjana Babrauskiene, Chair of the Governing Board Foreword Cedefop has been working on transparency and recognition of qualifications since the 1980s and has helped shape the European qualifications framework (EQF), adopted in 2008 and revised in 2017. The long-term priority of the EQF is to strengthen transparency and comparability of European qualifications, to support mobility and progression of students and workers across national and institutional borders. The EQF has triggered development of national qualifications frameworks (NQFs) across Europe. NQFs primarily add value by promoting the learning outcomes principle and by adopting a comprehensive approach to cover all levels and types of qualifications (general education, vocational education and training and higher education) and opening up to qualifications awarded in non-formal settings. The dynamic progress of NQFs over the past few years produced comprehensive maps of national qualifications systems and qualifi- cations. This increases transparency across systems and borders, and helps promote comparability of qualifications at European level. This publication on the latest NQF developments aims to share how 43 NQFs in 39 countries participating in the EQF implementation (28 EU Member States as well as Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Re- public of Macedonia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Kosovo, Montenegro, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland and Turkey) are structured, and how national qualifications have been allocated to NQF levels and linked to the EQF. NQFs are more than a technical matter to be summarised in a few infographics: they are primar- ily cooperation platforms and meeting points bringing together stakeholders from education and labour market contexts to discuss qualifications and skills policies, creating conditions for more responsive, flexible and permeable qual- ification systems. NQFs are playing an important role in supporting the modernisation of ed- ucation, particularly vocational education and training (VET). They are making VET (in its complex and diverse profile) more visible in the overall education and training landscape. This need for transparency is emphasised by the fact that the VET sector is more diverse than other sectors and also undergoing sig- nificant changes: increasing qualification numbers and blurring lines between initial and continuing VET. Qualifications frameworks are also playing a role in increasing the standing of VET by demonstrating the increased importance of vocationally oriented education and training at higher levels (EQF levels 5-8) and parity of esteem between VET and general education at EQF level 4. Qualifications frameworks give coherence to the increasingly complex world of qualifications. NQF and EQF levels on certificates, diplomas and in qualifications databases help citizens assess their own qualifications; they al- low employers to match person’s qualifications better with requirements of the job; national policy-makers can compare – via EQF – qualifications available in their country to those in other countries and decide whether changes are needed; recognition of qualifications becomes easier. Foreword 5 Cedefop has accompanied the referencing process of NQFs to the EQF in every step of its development. Since 2009, Cedefop has monitored and ana- lysed NQF development in all countries participating in EQF implementation and has organised several major conferences on related themes; most recent- ly, a policy learning conference considered the added value and impact of NQFs (1). The conference concluded that awareness of EQF and NQFs among end-users – employers, students, guidance practitioners – is progressing but still weak. This publication, providing an overview of European NQFs and how they link to the EQF, celebrates the tenth anniversary of the EQF process and its contribution to transparency and comparability of European qualifications and trust in NQFs as guardians of the quality of qualifications. James Joachim Calleja Director (1) Peer learning conference organised by Cedefop in cooperation with the European Commission and Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI): Do national qualifications frameworks make a difference? Thessaloniki, 9 and 10 November 2017. http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/pt/events-and-projects/ events/peer-learning-conference [accessed 1.2.2018]. Table of contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................10 PART I Overview and main tendencies ..........................................................................................................11 1. National qualifications framework developments in Europe: overall progress ...............................12 2. NQFs in Europe: common characteristics .....................................................................................14 3. Early impact of European national qualifications frameworks ........................................................16 3.1. Improved transparency of national qualification systems .......................................................16 3.2. Reinforced and more consistent implementation of learning outcomes approaches ...........17 3.3. Linking qualifications frameworks and validation of non-formal and informal learning ..........17 3.4. Greater stakeholder engagement and coordination ..............................................................18 3.5. NQFs have opened up to qualifications awarded outside formal education and training .....18 3.6. NQFs and higher vocational education and training ...............................................................19 4. Areas of limited impact to date ......................................................................................................20 4.1. Visibility and labour market use .............................................................................................20 4.2. Articulation between institutions and education and training subsystems .............................20 4.3. Institutional reform: work in progress .....................................................................................21 4.4. NQF support to recognition of qualifications across countries: at an early stage .................21 PART II National qualifications frameworks EU Member States ..............................................................................................................................23 1. Austria .............................................................................................................................................24 2. Belgium ...........................................................................................................................................26 2.1 Flemish Community ................................................................................................................26 2.2 French Community ...................................................................................................................29 2.3 German-speaking Community .................................................................................................30 3. Bulgaria ..........................................................................................................................................32 4. Croatia ............................................................................................................................................34 5. Cyprus ............................................................................................................................................36 6. Czech Republic ..............................................................................................................................38 7. Denmark .........................................................................................................................................40
Recommended publications
  • ISCED 2011 Level 8

    ISCED 2011 Level 8

    11 Chapter 11 ISCED 2011 level 8: Doctoral or equivalent level Programmes at ISCED level 8, or doctoral or equivalent level, are designed primarily to lead to an advanced research qualification. Programmes at this ISCED level are devoted to advanced study and original research and are typically offered only by research-oriented tertiary educational institutions such as universities. Doctoral programmes exist in both academic and professional fields. The theoretical duration of these programmes is three years full-time in most countries, although the actual time that students take to complete the programmes is typically longer. Programmes classified at ISCED level 8 may be referred to in many ways, for example: PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar terms. For international comparability purposes the term, ‘doctoral or equivalent level’ is used to label ISCED level 8. ISCED 2011 OPERATIONAL MANUAL © OECD, European Union, UNESCO-UIS 2015 97 11 ISCED 2011 LEVEL 8: DOCTORAL OR EQUIVALENT LEVEL PART III DESCRIPTION Definition (§259)1 Programmes at ISCED level 8, or doctoral or equivalent level, are designed primarily to lead to an advanced research qualification. Programmes at this ISCED level are devoted to advanced study and original research and are typically offered only by research-oriented tertiary educational institutions such as universities. Doctoral programmes exist in both academic and professional fields. (§261) Entry into ISCED level 8 programmes or junior research positions normally requires the successful completion of specific ISCED level 7 programmes. ISCED level 8 requires at least three years of full-time equivalent study, making a total cumulative duration of at least seven years of full-time education at the tertiary level.
  • List of Tech Levels for 2017 Performance Tables

    List of Tech Levels for 2017 Performance Tables

    2017 16 to 19 performance tables: qualifications in the tech level category February 2015 (replaces December 2014 version) Contents Introduction 3 Headline performance measures for 16-19 year olds 4 Qualifications that will be included in the tech level category in the 2017 16-19 performance tables 5 Tech levels in agriculture, horticulture and animal care 5 Tech levels in arts, media and publishing 9 Tech levels in accounting and finance, business, administration and law 11 Tech levels in child development and well-being 12 Tech levels in construction, planning and the built environment 13 Tech levels in engineering, manufacturing and transportation operations 16 Tech levels in health, public services and care 20 Tech levels in information and communication technology 21 Tech levels in leisure, sport, travel and tourism 22 Tech levels in retail, hospitality and commercial enterprise 23 2 Introduction This is the final list of qualifications that have been approved by the Department for Education (DfE) for teaching to 16 to 19 year olds from September 2015. These qualifications will be reported in the tech level category of the 2017 16-19 performance tables (to be published in early 2018). They will be reported alongside qualifications such as A Levels and other vocational qualifications. Qualifications that will be reported in performance tables for the first time in 2017 have an asterisk (*) after the title. Qualifications that were added to the list in February 2015 are indicated with a hash symbol (#) after the title. Tech levels are rigorous advanced (level 3) technical qualifications on a par with A Levels and recognised by employers.
  • Assessment for Qualification and Certification in Upper Secondary Education: a Stefanie Dufaux Review of Country Practices and Research Evidence

    Assessment for Qualification and Certification in Upper Secondary Education: a Stefanie Dufaux Review of Country Practices and Research Evidence

    OECD Education Working Papers No. 83 Assessment for Qualification and Certification in Upper Secondary Education: A Stefanie Dufaux Review of Country Practices and Research Evidence https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k92zp1cshvb-en Unclassified EDU/WKP(2012)20 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 04-Sep-2012 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR EDUCATION Unclassified EDU/WKP(2012)20 ASSESSMENT FOR QUALIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION IN UPPER SECONDARY EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF COUNTRY PRACTICES AND RESEARCH EVIDENCE OECD Education Working Paper No. 83 by Stefanie Dufaux This paper was prepared by Stefanie Dufaux, who joined the OECD Directorate for Education in September 2010 as a Carlo Schmid Fellow, and worked as a Consultant in the Education and Training Policy Division until July 2011. This paper is part of the work undertaken by the OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes. The OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes is designed to respond to the strong interest in evaluation and assessment issues evident at national and international levels. The overall purpose is to explore how systems of evaluation and assessment can be used to improve the quality, equity and efficiency of school education. The Review looks at the various components of assessment and evaluation frameworks that countries use with the objective of improving student outcomes. These include student assessment, teacher appraisal, school assessment and system evaluation. More information is available at: www.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy. Contacts: Ms. Deborah Nusche [Tel: +33(0) 1 45 24 78 01; e-mail: [email protected]] and Mr.
  • Higher Diploma Postgraduate Diploma

    Higher Diploma Postgraduate Diploma

    HIGHER DIPLOMA Higher Diploma in Business Management Higher Diploma in Computers, Electronics and Communications POSTGRADUATE DIPLOMA Postgraduate Diploma in International Business Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Management About Auston 03 About Us Auston Institute of Management, a popular school in Singapore for our Engineering and Management programmes, provides an industry focused education. We are a practical and outcome based institution that offers top-up degrees to improve the employability, and the lives, of our graduates. We are dedicated to our students success and place their learning, welfare and workplace-ability above all else. Our campus is set in the heart of Singapore, just beyond the borders of the Central Business District and fosters a tight-knit community of teachers, students and administrators from Singapore and the region. In February 2013, Auston was awarded the prestigious 4 years EduTrust Certification by Council of Private Education (CPE) for achieving the high standards in school administration and management, provision of educational services and positive financial health. We are registered under Enhanced Registration Framework by Council of Private Education Singapore. Our Culture We aim to create a culture that encourages friendship, open communication, trust and respect within the organization and with our stakeholders. Our Mision, Vision and Values MISSION - To provide a value added education for high workplace relevance VISION - To be the preferred education provider in the Asia Pacific region VALUES - Integrity = Trust and Responsibility, Creativity in Our Approach, Dedication to Our Students Success Why Students Choose Auston 1. Our students A typical student cohort is nearly 50% Singapore and 50% International with students from Korea, China, India, Myanmar, and more.
  • Academic Studies for Officers

    Academic Studies for Officers

    University VIENNA and National Defense Academy VIENNA Academic Studies for Officers A Central European Perspective (Presentations of the First International Conference in Vienna, 15 – 19 March 1999) Published by Brigadier-General Gernot ALBRECHT Vienna, April 2001 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS WOLFGANG GREISENEGGER..................................................3 Welcome Address......................................................................................3 ERNEST KÖNIG..........................................................................5 Welcome Address......................................................................................5 GERNOT ALBRECHT .................................................................9 Opening Statement....................................................................................9 ARMIN A. STEINKAMM ............................................................10 The Bundeswehr University [UDBW]..................................................10 JÖRG E. P. KELLER.................................................................17 Academic Officer Training within and for the Armed Forces – a German Perspective ....................................................................................................................17 BEAT A. KÄCH .........................................................................32 The Swiss Military College ....................................................................32 ALTERO FASANO.....................................................................43
  • Referencing the Scottish Credit & Qualifications Framework (SCQF)

    Referencing the Scottish Credit & Qualifications Framework (SCQF)

    Referencing the Scottish Credit & Qualifications Framework (SCQF) to the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) Report 2019 Referencing the Scottish Credit & Qualifications Framework (SCQF to the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) Referencing Report 2019 1 This page has been left blank deliberately. Referencing the Scottish Credit & Qualifications Framework (SCQF to the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) Referencing Report 2019 2 PREFACE The Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework (SCQF) was first referenced to the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) in 2009. This referencing was published in 2010 as part of a report on the referencing of the National Qualifications Frameworks (NQFs) of the four UK countries to the EQF. In the intervening eight years since publication, the SCQF has developed considerably, with the revision of SCQF Level Descriptors, the redefinition of SCQF Principles and a considerable expansion in the range and number of qualifications on the Framework. In 2015/16, a pilot project was undertaken to establish if the original referencing outcomes continued to be a true reflection of links between the SCQF and EQF. This report builds on the work completed in the pilot and provides a revised and updated analysis of the SCQF/EQF referencing. This report sets out the evidence that the SCQF continues to meet the ten criteria and ten quality assurance principles which govern referencing to the EQF. To provide a context for the reader, it also describes political, legal and social context in which the SCQF operates, explains the nature of the learning landscape in Scotland insofar as it relates to the SCQF, and describes the different kinds of qualifications in the Framework.
  • World Directory of Medical Schools

    World Directory of Medical Schools

    WORLD DIRECTORY OF MEDICAL SCHOOLS WORLD HEALTH• ORGANIZATION GENEVA 1963 lst edition, 1953 2od edition, 1957 3rd edition, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction . 7 Explanatory notes to lists of medical schools 9 Details of systems of medical education and lists of medical teaching institutions, in alphabetical order of countries 11 Annex 1. Conditions governing the practice of medicine in some countries without medical schools 329 Annex 2. Number of years required for medical degree and other conditions for the practice of medicine 333 Annex 3. Numbers of medical, dental, and veterinary schools.: comparative list . 336 Annex 4. Africa: medical schools and physicians, 1960 . 339 Annex 5. Americas: medical schools and physicians, 1960 341 Annex 6. Asia: medical schools and physicians, l 960 343 Annex 7. Europe: medical schools and physicians, 1960. 345 Annex 8. Oceania: medical schooJs and physicians, 1960 346 Annex 9. World totals: medical schools and physicians, 1960 347 INTRODUCTION The Third Edition of the World Directory of Medical Schools lists institutions of medical education in eighty-seven countries and gives a few pertinent facts about each. General statements describing the salient features of undergraduate medical training in each country have also been included. No attempt has been made to draw firm conclusions or to make pro­ nouncements on medical education as a world-wide phenomenon. The descriptive accounts and factual material which make up this Directory may be considered as part of the raw data on which the reader can base bis own independent analysis; they are intended to be no more than a general guide, and investigators in the subject of medical education should not expect to find a complete report therein.
  • Diploma Equivalency List

    Diploma Equivalency List

    Diploma equivalency list International applicants should have a foreign equivalent of the Dutch VWO-Diploma (pre-university education). You can check whether your diploma meets this requirement in this diploma equivalency list. Please note that this does not guarantee admission, nor can you derive rights from this list. Note as well that, depending on the Bachelor’s programme of your choice, subject-specific requirements and/or language requirements may apply. Please refer to the webpages of the Bachelor's programme of your choice for detailed information. If your diploma is not listed, it may still be an equivalent of the Dutch VWO-Diploma, but additional requirements regarding subjects taken and grades obtained may apply. For details, please feel free to contact the Admissions Office. Country Name Diploma Albania Diplomë e Maturës Shtetërore Aruba Arubaans VWO-Diploma Austria Reifeprüfungszeugnis or Reife- und Diplomprüfungszeugnis Belgium (Flanders) Diploma van Secundair Onderwijs, Algemeen Secundair Onderwijs (ASO); TSO and KSO to be checked on an individual basis Belgium (Wallonia) Certificat d'Enseignement Secondaire Supérieur, Enseignement Général Bosnia and Herzegovina Diploma o Položenom Maturskom Ispitu (RS)/Diploma o Završenoj Srednjoj školi (FiBH)(Secondary School Leaving Diploma) Bulgaria Diploma za Sredno Obrazovanie Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Examinations (CAPE): CAPE is Examinations (CAPE) required with three double units (Unit 1 + 2) in three general/academic subjects Croatia Maturalna
  • FACULTY of EDUCATION Postgraduat Handbook CONTENTS

    FACULTY of EDUCATION Postgraduat Handbook CONTENTS

    sity el ourne FACULTY OF EDUCATION Postgraduat Handbook CONTENTS Page Page Welcome to the University of MelbourneSection 1 Postgraduate Certificate and Diploma Section 3 The Melbourne Experience 1.2 Courses Important Dates 2002 1.2 Graduate Certificate in Early Childhood Studies 3.2 Services and facilities 1.4 Graduate Certificate of Training and Development 3.2 Scholarships for international students 1.5 Postgraduate Certificate in Educational Studies Scholarships for Australian Students 1.7 (TESOL)/(Modern Languages Education) 3.3 The International Centre 1.7 Postgraduate Certificate in Mathematics and Mathematics Education 3.4 Fees 1.8 Living and Working in Australia 1.8 Postgraduate Certificate in Professional Studies in Education 3.5 English language requirements 1.9 Postgraduate Certificate in Science Education Accommodation 1.11 (Physics) 3.8 Types of Courses Offered 1.11 Postgraduate Certificate in Science (Teaching) 3.9 Applying for Courses (international students) 1.12 Postgraduate Certificate of Education and Training 3.9 Postgraduate Diploma in Assessment and The Faculty of Education: General Information Section 2 Evaluation 3.11 A Message from the Dean 2.1 Postgraduate Diploma in Computer Education 3.12 A Message from the Associate Dean Postgraduate Diploma in Educational (Research and Graduate Studies) 2.2 Administration 3.13 Faculty of Education Postgraduate Courses 2.2 Postgraduate Diploma in Educational Studies 3.15 Where to go for Advice and Course Information 2.3 Postgraduate Diploma in Mathematics and Information Guides
  • Higher Education Entrance Qualifications and Exams in Europe: a Comparison

    Higher Education Entrance Qualifications and Exams in Europe: a Comparison

    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES CULTURE AND EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION ENTRANCE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXAMS IN EUROPE: A COMPARISON STUDY This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Culture and Education. AUTHORS Cecile Hoareau McGrath, Marie Louise Henham, Anne Corbett, Niccolo Durazzi, Michael Frearson, Barbara Janta, Bregtje W. Kamphuis, Eriko Katashiro, Nina Brankovic, Benoit Guerin, Catriona Manville, Inga Schwartz, Daniel Schweppenstedde RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Markus J. Prutsch Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE Lyna Pärt LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Translation: DE, FR ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in May 2014 Brussels © European Union, 2014 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES CULTURE AND EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION ENTRANCE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXAMS IN EUROPE: A COMPARISON STUDY Abstract The study analyses admission systems to higher education across ten countries, covering some countries of the European Union (France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom), a candidate country (Turkey) as well as commonly used international comparators (Australia, Japan and the US).
  • Classifying Educational Programmes

    Classifying Educational Programmes

    Classifying Educational Programmes Manual for ISCED-97 Implementation in OECD Countries 1999 Edition ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Foreword As the structure of educational systems varies widely between countries, a framework to collect and report data on educational programmes with a similar level of educational content is a clear prerequisite for the production of internationally comparable education statistics and indicators. In 1997, a revised International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED-97) was adopted by the UNESCO General Conference. This multi-dimensional framework has the potential to greatly improve the comparability of education statistics – as data collected under this framework will allow for the comparison of educational programmes with similar levels of educational content – and to better reflect complex educational pathways in the OECD indicators. The purpose of Classifying Educational Programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 Implementation in OECD Countries is to give clear guidance to OECD countries on how to implement the ISCED-97 framework in international data collections. First, this manual summarises the rationale for the revised ISCED framework, as well as the defining characteristics of the ISCED-97 levels and cross-classification categories for OECD countries, emphasising the criteria that define the boundaries between educational levels. The methodology for applying ISCED-97 in the national context that is described in this manual has been developed and agreed upon by the OECD/INES Technical Group, a working group on education statistics and indicators representing 29 OECD countries. The OECD Secretariat has also worked closely with both EUROSTAT and UNESCO to ensure that ISCED-97 will be implemented in a uniform manner across all countries.
  • Degrees, Diplomas and Certificates Awarded in Conjunction with the Glasgow School of Art

    Degrees, Diplomas and Certificates Awarded in Conjunction with the Glasgow School of Art

    Calendar 2011-12 DEGREES, DIPLOMAS AND CERTIFICATES AWARDED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GLASGOW SCHOOL OF ART CONTENTS LIST Page Appeals by Students ........................................................................................ 4 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 4 Degrees of Bachelor of Arts in Design, Bachelor of Arts in Fine Art, Bachelor of Arts in Communication Design, Bachelor of Arts in Interior Design, and Bachelor of Arts in Silversmithing and Jewellery Design .............. 5 Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Design (Part-Time) Ceramics ............................ 8 Degree of Bachelor of Architecture .................................................................. 8 Diploma in Architecture and Master of Architecture (by Conversion) Degree ........................................................................................................... 11 Degrees in Product Design Engineering ........................................................ 13 Degrees of Bachelor of Design (Product Design) and Master of European Design (Product Design) ................................................................ 14 Degree of Bachelor of Design in Fashion Textiles ......................................... 17 Degree of Bachelor of Deisgn in Digital Culture ............................................. 20 Taught Postgraduate Awards at The Glasgow School of Art ......................... 22 Degree of Master of Science in Product Design Engineering........................