DOCSLIB.ORG

Higher Education Entrance Qualifications and Exams in Europe: a Comparison

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Higher Education Entrance Qualifications and Exams in Europe: a Comparison DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES CULTURE AND EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION ENTRANCE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXAMS IN EUROPE: A COMPARISON STUDY This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Culture and Education. AUTHORS Cecile Hoareau McGrath, Marie Louise Henham, Anne Corbett, Niccolo Durazzi, Michael Frearson, Barbara Janta, Bregtje W. Kamphuis, Eriko Katashiro, Nina Brankovic, Benoit Guerin, Catriona Manville, Inga Schwartz, Daniel Schweppenstedde RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Markus J. Prutsch Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: poldep-cohesion@europarl.europa.eu EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE Lyna Pärt LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Translation: DE, FR ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: poldep-cohesion@europarl.europa.eu Manuscript completed in May 2014 Brussels © European Union, 2014 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES CULTURE AND EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION ENTRANCE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXAMS IN EUROPE: A COMPARISON STUDY Abstract The study analyses admission systems to higher education across ten countries, covering some countries of the European Union (France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom), a candidate country (Turkey) as well as commonly used international comparators (Australia, Japan and the US). These countries are compared on three axes: the equity of admissions, their quality and their ability to encourage students’ mobility. On this basis, recommendations are provided with regard to admission to higher education in Europe. IP/B/CULT/IC/2013_007 May 2014 PE 529.057 EN Higher Education Entrance Qualifications and Exams in Europe: A Comparison __________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES 5 LIST OF FIGURES 6 LIST OF BOXES 6 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 7 PREFACE 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 1. INTRODUCTION 15 1.1.Worldwide trends influencing admissions 15 1.2.Policy context 16 1.3.The history of EU intervention in higher education 17 1.4.Key questions 19 1.5.Descriptive questions 20 1.6.Evaluative questions 20 2. METHOD 25 2.1.Statistical overview 25 2.2.Case study comparison 27 2.3.Benchmarking of countries 28 2.4.Stakeholders’ interviews 33 2.5.Review of policy and national sources 33 3. VARIETY OF ADMISSION SYSTEMS: AN OVERVIEW 35 3.1.Entry Requirements 35 3.2.Content of secondary school exams 40 3.3.Variation within national systems 42 3.4.Actors 45 3.5.The age of entry into higher education 49 3.6.Timeframe of application 51 3.7.The cost of application to higher education 52 3.8.Summary 53 3 Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies __________________________________________________________________________________________ 4. THE EQUITY OF ADMISSIONS SYSTEMS 55 4.1.Strengths and weaknesses of each system in terms of equity 55 4.2.Admission systems and socio-economic inequalities 57 4.3.Admission systems and specific groups of learners 62 4.4.Summary 66 5. THE QUALITY OF ADMISSIONS SYSTEMS 67 5.1.Strengths and weaknesses of each system in terms of quality 67 5.2.The relationship between management of admissions and quality 70 5.3.Admission systems as reliable predictors of students’ achievements 72 5.4.Timing of applications 74 5.5.Summary 74 6. ENABLING MOBILITY THROUGH ADMISSIONS SYSTEMS 77 6.1.Strengths and weaknesses of each system in terms of mobility 78 6.2.Trends in inbound and outbound mobility 80 6.3.Admissions as a regulating mechanism 82 6.4.The absence of European-wide coordination initiatives 83 6.5.International comparisons on the coordination of admissions 85 6.6.Summary 87 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 89 7.1.Conclusions 89 7.2.Recommendations for European institutions 90 7.3.Recommendations for Member States 94 7.4.Issues for further research 95 BIBLIOGRAPHY 97 ANNEXES 115 4 Higher Education Entrance Qualifications and Exams in Europe: A Comparison __________________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 International comparision 29 TABLE 2 Overview of regulatory schemes in country case studies 32 TABLE 3 Summary of entry requirements 36 TABLE 4 Role of higher education institutions in the selection of students, selection criteria and management of applications 45 TABLE 5 Bodies managing admissions 47 TABLE 6 Average and typical age of entry to higher education 50 TABLE 7 Application, administrative, and other fees 53 TABLE 8 Strengths and weaknesses of each system in terms of equity 56 TABLE 9 Comparison between system characteristics and indicators related to access and attainment 58 TABLE 10 An overview of measures adopted towards disabled students across the 10 case studies 65 TABLE 11 Strengths and weaknesses of admission systems in terms of quality 68 TABLE 12 Strengths and weaknesses of admission systems regarding mobility 78 TABLE 13 Inbound mobility 80 TABLE 14 Outbound mobility ratio 81 TABLE 15 List of admission agencies 92 5 Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies __________________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 Three stages of the study 20 FIGURE 2 International overview 27 FIGURE 3 Admissions system in Germany 87 FIGURE 4 A suggested information portal and support service for higher education admissions in Europe 93 LIST OF BOXES BOX 1 Secondary school leaving certificates with varying degree of choice: England and Slovenia 41 BOX 2 Standardised tests in addition to school leaving certificate 42 BOX 3 Centralised and dual admissions systems: case study country examples 49 6 Higher Education Entrance Qualifications and Exams in Europe: A Comparison __________________________________________________________________________________________ GLOSSARY OF TERMS Admission is defined as a ‘specific activity undertaken to admit students to universities’ for the purpose of this study (Matross Helms, 2008: 2). This definition is narrower than definitions provided elsewhere, which included for instance: ‘the process from when a potential student develops an interest in entry to higher education until enrolment in a particular institution and course takes place’ (Harman, 1994: 318). Considerations related to admissions in this study include entry qualifications and examinations, application procedures (e.g. length), and the regulation of such entry criteria to higher education. The study does not cover certain broader factors such as the drivers of the choice of students regarding particular higher education institutions and disciplines, e.g. rankings (Horstschraeer, 2012). This study concentrates on admissions to undergraduate education in universities and academic degrees, and excludes admissions in postgraduate education, short degrees or more vocational routes. An open admission system exists when holders of relevant secondary school certificates have an automatic right of access to higher education (Sargent et al., 2012: 24). A selective admission system is a system where applicants have to meet other criteria in addition to holding a secondary school certificate to be admitted to higher education institutions (Sargent et al., 2012: 24). Inbound mobility rate is the number of students from abroad studying in a given country, expressed as a percentage of total tertiary enrolment in that country (UNESCO, 2012). Outbound mobility ratio is the number of students from a given country studying abroad, expressed as a percentage of total tertiary enrolment in that country (UNESCO, 2012). Qualifications include any diploma or other certificate issued by a competent authority attesting the successful completion of an education programme and giving the holder of the qualification the right to be considered for admission to higher education, according to the Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education. Access to higher education refers to the opportunity to enter higher education, though is not a guarantee for admission. The principles of inherited merit, equality of rights and equality of opportunity have been used to frame access policies according to Clancy and Goastellec (2007: 137-38). Access includes two categories of students: those who enter higher education for the first time (‘new entrants’); and those who use the facilities of higher education (‘enrolled students’) regardless of how many years they have already spent in higher education (Keiser et and O’Heron, 2005: 17). This study concentrates on new entrants to an undergraduate level/first cycle of higher education. Where admission practice is restrictive or selective, the distinction needs to be made between conditions for access, and conditions for admission (Bergan, 2007). 7 Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies __________________________________________________________________________________________ Several types of admission systems and requirements exist. These admission
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Tech Levels for 2017 Performance Tables
    2017 16 to 19 performance tables: qualifications in the tech level category February 2015 (replaces December 2014 version) Contents Introduction 3 Headline performance measures for 16-19 year olds 4 Qualifications that will be included in the tech level category in the 2017 16-19 performance tables 5 Tech levels in agriculture, horticulture and animal care 5 Tech levels in arts, media and publishing 9 Tech levels in accounting and finance, business, administration and law 11 Tech levels in child development and well-being 12 Tech levels in construction, planning and the built environment 13 Tech levels in engineering, manufacturing and transportation operations 16 Tech levels in health, public services and care 20 Tech levels in information and communication technology 21 Tech levels in leisure, sport, travel and tourism 22 Tech levels in retail, hospitality and commercial enterprise 23 2 Introduction This is the final list of qualifications that have been approved by the Department for Education (DfE) for teaching to 16 to 19 year olds from September 2015. These qualifications will be reported in the tech level category of the 2017 16-19 performance tables (to be published in early 2018). They will be reported alongside qualifications such as A Levels and other vocational qualifications. Qualifications that will be reported in performance tables for the first time in 2017 have an asterisk (*) after the title. Qualifications that were added to the list in February 2015 are indicated with a hash symbol (#) after the title. Tech levels are rigorous advanced (level 3) technical qualifications on a par with A Levels and recognised by employers.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment for Qualification and Certification in Upper Secondary Education: a Stefanie Dufaux Review of Country Practices and Research Evidence
    OECD Education Working Papers No. 83 Assessment for Qualification and Certification in Upper Secondary Education: A Stefanie Dufaux Review of Country Practices and Research Evidence https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k92zp1cshvb-en Unclassified EDU/WKP(2012)20 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 04-Sep-2012 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR EDUCATION Unclassified EDU/WKP(2012)20 ASSESSMENT FOR QUALIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION IN UPPER SECONDARY EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF COUNTRY PRACTICES AND RESEARCH EVIDENCE OECD Education Working Paper No. 83 by Stefanie Dufaux This paper was prepared by Stefanie Dufaux, who joined the OECD Directorate for Education in September 2010 as a Carlo Schmid Fellow, and worked as a Consultant in the Education and Training Policy Division until July 2011. This paper is part of the work undertaken by the OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes. The OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes is designed to respond to the strong interest in evaluation and assessment issues evident at national and international levels. The overall purpose is to explore how systems of evaluation and assessment can be used to improve the quality, equity and efficiency of school education. The Review looks at the various components of assessment and evaluation frameworks that countries use with the objective of improving student outcomes. These include student assessment, teacher appraisal, school assessment and system evaluation. More information is available at: www.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy. Contacts: Ms. Deborah Nusche [Tel: +33(0) 1 45 24 78 01; e-mail: deborah.nusche@oecd.org] and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRY BASED ADMISSION CRITERIA Country Examination Minimum Criteria INTERNATIONAL SAT (Scholastic Assessment Test) Reasoning
    COUNTRY BASED ADMISSION CRITERIA Country Examination Minimum criteria INTERNATIONAL SAT (Scholastic Assessment Test) Min. 1000 Reasoning. KADIR HAS INSTITUTIONAL CODE: 7396 INTERNATIONAL Abitur and Fachabitür Max.4 INTERNATIONAL Al-Shahada-Al Thanawiyya For all B.Sc. Min. 180, for B.A. programs min. 170 INTERNATIONAL Al-Shahada-Al Thanawiyya Al- For all B.Sc. Min. 180, for Amma B.A. programs min. 170 INTERNATIONAL American College Test (ACT) Math, Science and total Min. 21 INTERNATIONAL Attestat o Srednem Min. 3 (Polinom) Obshchem Obrazovanii INTERNATIONAL French Baccalaureate Min. 12 INTERNATIONAL GCE (General Certificate of Min. 2 A-levels with grades D and Education) above INTERNATIONAL IB (International Baccalaureate) min. 28 INTERNATIONAL Matura Max.4 INTERNATIONAL Tawjihi For all B.Sc. Min. 80, for B.A. programs min. 75 INTERNATIONAL International Student Science Olympics Golden, Silver, or Bronze Medals from the international student Olympics recognized by TUBITAK INTERNATIONAL West African Examination Council- Min. C grade from min. 6 subjects International Senior School Certificate Examination (WEAC-SSCE) INTERNATIONAL YÖS Min. 50 INTERNATIONAL European Baccalaureate Min. 60% INTERNATIONAL BTEC – QSF Diploma Min. D grades from min. 3 subjects INTERNATIONAL Western European Open School Min. 60% Examination INTERNATIONAL International High School Diploma Min. 60% AUSTRIA Maturazeugnis/Matura/Reifeprufungsze Min. 3 ugnis /Abschlusszeugnis from a Fachschule (with at least 4 years of full time study) AFGHANISTAN KONKUR General State Examination Min. 210/350 or 60% or High School Diploma (Doreyeh Aali) ALBANIA Dëftesë Pjekurie / Certificate of Min. 6 Maturity ALGERIA Algerian baccalaureate Min. 12 ANGOLA Diploma de Ensino Pre Universitario / Min. 12 Carta do Curso Complementar Liceus/Habilitacoes Literarias ARGENTINA Titulo de Bachiller Min.
    [Show full text]
  • International-Vwo-Equivalent-Diplomas-2014-2015.Pdf
    Minimum entrance qualifications for non-Dutch diplomas Maastricht University 2014/2015 Country Diploma International European Baccalaureate Diploma schools International Baccalaureate Diploma Be aware! A Certificate is not sufficient! Albania Dëftese Pjekurie Austria Reifezeugnis / Reifeprüfungszeugnis Azerbaijan Orta Tahsil Haqqinda Attestat (average grade of 4) and national entrance examination Belgium Diploma van Secundair Onderwijs / Diplome de l'Énseignement Secondaire Superieur / Abschlusszeugnis der Oberstufe des Sekundarunterrichts Brazil Certificado de Conclusao de 2° grau and 1 completed year university education Bosnia- Matura Herzegovina Bulgaria Diploma za Zavarsheno Sredno Obrazovanie (Diploma za Zavarsheno Sredno Obrazovanie) Canada, Ontario OSSD including at least 6 U-courses or OAC’s Canada, Quebec Diploma d’Etudes Collégiales (DEC) préuniversitaire Canada, other High School Diploma with a relatively large number of academic courses in grades 11 and 12 with good grades China Senior Middle School Graduation Certificate (Gaozhong) and 1 completed year university education Croatia Svjedodžba o (državnoj) maturi obtained at a Gymnazijum Cyprus Apolytirio - Gymnasium Czech republic Vysvedcení o Maturitní Zkoušce obtained at a Gymnázium Denmark Studentereksamenbevis (STX) or Brevis for Høgere Forberedelseksamen (HF) Estonia Gümnaasiumi Loputunnistus Finland Ylioppilastutkintotodistus France Diplome du Baccalauréat Général or Diplôme du Baccalauréat Technologique. Germany Zeugnis der Allgemeinen Hochschulreife (Abitur) Greece
    [Show full text]
  • EDUCATION in CHINA a Snapshot This Work Is Published Under the Responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD
    EDUCATION IN CHINA A Snapshot This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Photo credits: Cover: © EQRoy / Shutterstock.com; © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © astudio / Shutterstock.com Inside: © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © li jianbing / Shutterstock.com; © tangxn / Shutterstock.com; © chuyuss / Shutterstock.com; © astudio / Shutterstock.com; © Frame China / Shutterstock.com © OECD 2016 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to rights@oecd.org. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at info@copyright.com or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at contact@cfcopies.com. Education in China A SNAPSHOT Foreword In 2015, three economies in China participated in the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, or PISA, for the first time: Beijing, a municipality, Jiangsu, a province on the eastern coast of the country, and Guangdong, a southern coastal province.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Studies for Officers
    University VIENNA and National Defense Academy VIENNA Academic Studies for Officers A Central European Perspective (Presentations of the First International Conference in Vienna, 15 – 19 March 1999) Published by Brigadier-General Gernot ALBRECHT Vienna, April 2001 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS WOLFGANG GREISENEGGER..................................................3 Welcome Address......................................................................................3 ERNEST KÖNIG..........................................................................5 Welcome Address......................................................................................5 GERNOT ALBRECHT .................................................................9 Opening Statement....................................................................................9 ARMIN A. STEINKAMM ............................................................10 The Bundeswehr University [UDBW]..................................................10 JÖRG E. P. KELLER.................................................................17 Academic Officer Training within and for the Armed Forces – a German Perspective ....................................................................................................................17 BEAT A. KÄCH .........................................................................32 The Swiss Military College ....................................................................32 ALTERO FASANO.....................................................................43
    [Show full text]
  • Referencing the Scottish Credit & Qualifications Framework (SCQF)
    Referencing the Scottish Credit & Qualifications Framework (SCQF) to the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) Report 2019 Referencing the Scottish Credit & Qualifications Framework (SCQF to the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) Referencing Report 2019 1 This page has been left blank deliberately. Referencing the Scottish Credit & Qualifications Framework (SCQF to the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) Referencing Report 2019 2 PREFACE The Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework (SCQF) was first referenced to the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) in 2009. This referencing was published in 2010 as part of a report on the referencing of the National Qualifications Frameworks (NQFs) of the four UK countries to the EQF. In the intervening eight years since publication, the SCQF has developed considerably, with the revision of SCQF Level Descriptors, the redefinition of SCQF Principles and a considerable expansion in the range and number of qualifications on the Framework. In 2015/16, a pilot project was undertaken to establish if the original referencing outcomes continued to be a true reflection of links between the SCQF and EQF. This report builds on the work completed in the pilot and provides a revised and updated analysis of the SCQF/EQF referencing. This report sets out the evidence that the SCQF continues to meet the ten criteria and ten quality assurance principles which govern referencing to the EQF. To provide a context for the reader, it also describes political, legal and social context in which the SCQF operates, explains the nature of the learning landscape in Scotland insofar as it relates to the SCQF, and describes the different kinds of qualifications in the Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relevance of Standardized College Entrance Exams for Low SES High School Students Regina Deil-Amen and Tenisha Lashawn Tevis
    DEIL-AMEN & TEVIS / College Entrance Exams 141 The Review of Higher Education Winter 2010, Volume 33, No. 2, pp. 141–175 Copyright © 2009 Association for the Study of Higher Education All Rights Reserved (ISSN 0162-5748) Circumscribed Agency: The Relevance of Standardized College Entrance Exams for Low SES High School Students Regina Deil-Amen and Tenisha LaShawn Tevis For the past half century, the U.S. school system has functioned as a highly rationalized and vertically integrated mechanism for socializing and sorting students into the existing social and economic structure. As educa- tional hierarchies expanded to increase access to postsecondary education, so reliance on the college entrance examination also expanded, with both meritocratic and stratifying consequences. The initial rise in the use of col- lege entrance exams provided an “objective” mechanism to counteract the widespread discrimination in college admissions processes (Lemann, 2000). However, critics have since exposed such exams, particularly the SAT, as weak predictors of college academic success, particularly for nontraditional students (Sedlacek, 2004); and the lower average scores of African American and Latino students on these exams continue to present daunting obstacles for them, especially in the form of barriers to admission to selective colleges (Hacker, 1992; Hedges & Nowell, 1998; Jencks & Phillips, 1998; Phillips, Brooks-Gunn, Duncan, Klebanov, & Crane, 1998; Steele, 1997). Underrep- REGINA DEIL-AMEN is an Assistant Professor at the Center for the Study of Higher Edu- cation at the University of Arizona, Tucson. TENISHA LASHAWN TEVIS is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Educational Resource Center at the University of the Pacific. Address queries to Regina Deil-Amen at the Center for the Study of Higher Education University of Arizona, Education Building, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Matura Examinations in Slovenia Case Study of the Introduction of an External Examinations System for Schools
    Matura Examinations in Slovenia Case Study of the Introduction of an External Examinations System for Schools – Sergij Gabrøœek – George Bethell CIP – Kataloæni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjiænica, Ljubljana 371.274/.276:373.5 GABRØŒEK, Sergij Matura examinations in Slovenia : case study of the introduction of an external examinations system for schools / Sergij Gabrøœek, George Bethell. – Ljubljana : National Examinations Centre, 1996 ISBN 961-6120-49-2 1. Bethell, George 61917696 Matura Examinations in Slovenia Case Study of the Introduction of an External Examinations System for Schools – Sergij Gabrøœek1 – George Bethell 2 1 Dr. Sergij Gabrøœek, Director, National Examinations Centre, Podmiløœakova 25, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 George Bethell, Educational Consultant, 17 Orchard Avenue, Cambridge CB4 2AQ, United Kingdom Contents 7 – Abstract 9 – Background to Slovenia 11 – History of the Development of Matura 21 Description of Matura and Comparison with the School-Based – ‘Final Examination’ 25 – Developing Subject Catalogues for Matura 29 – Development of Question Papers 33 – Preparing for Matura: Trial Examinations 41 – Preparing for Matura: Gaining Support 45 – The National Examinations Centre 53 – Future Activities 57 – Conclusions and Analysis 7 Abstract The place of assessment and certification of learner achievement continues to be of great interest throughout the world. However, in eastern and central Europe there is a particular urgency about the debate as newly independent states review and reform their education systems in the light of changing social and economic conditions. Slovenia is currently in the middle of a development programme which will eventually affect all parts of its education system. In July 1995, a major feature of the programme became reality when the first Matura, or graduation examination, was successfully conducted on a national scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Diploma Equivalency List
    Diploma equivalency list International applicants should have a foreign equivalent of the Dutch VWO-Diploma (pre-university education). You can check whether your diploma meets this requirement in this diploma equivalency list. Please note that this does not guarantee admission, nor can you derive rights from this list. Note as well that, depending on the Bachelor’s programme of your choice, subject-specific requirements and/or language requirements may apply. Please refer to the webpages of the Bachelor's programme of your choice for detailed information. If your diploma is not listed, it may still be an equivalent of the Dutch VWO-Diploma, but additional requirements regarding subjects taken and grades obtained may apply. For details, please feel free to contact the Admissions Office. Country Name Diploma Albania Diplomë e Maturës Shtetërore Aruba Arubaans VWO-Diploma Austria Reifeprüfungszeugnis or Reife- und Diplomprüfungszeugnis Belgium (Flanders) Diploma van Secundair Onderwijs, Algemeen Secundair Onderwijs (ASO); TSO and KSO to be checked on an individual basis Belgium (Wallonia) Certificat d'Enseignement Secondaire Supérieur, Enseignement Général Bosnia and Herzegovina Diploma o Položenom Maturskom Ispitu (RS)/Diploma o Završenoj Srednjoj školi (FiBH)(Secondary School Leaving Diploma) Bulgaria Diploma za Sredno Obrazovanie Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Examinations (CAPE): CAPE is Examinations (CAPE) required with three double units (Unit 1 + 2) in three general/academic subjects Croatia Maturalna
    [Show full text]
  • Education System Colombia
    Education system Colombi a described and compared with the Dutch system Education system | Evaluation chart Education system Colombia This document contains information on the education system of Colombia. We explain the Dutch equivalent of the most common qualifications from Colombia for the purpose of admission to Dutch higher education. Disclaimer We assemble the information for these descriptions of education systems with the greatest care. However, we cannot be held responsible for the consequences of errors or incomplete information in this document. With the exception of images and illustrations, the content of this publication is subject to the Creative Commons Name NonCommercial 3.0 Unported licence. Visit www.nuffic.nl/en/home/copyright for more information on the reuse of this publication. Education system Colombia | Nuffic | 1st edition, December 2012 | version 2, January 2015 2 Education system | Evaluation chart Education system Colombia Education system Colombia Doctor L8 (PhD) 2-4 Magíster L7 Especialista L6 Tecnólogo especializado L5 (universities) (universities / technological (technological institutions) institutions) 1-2 1-2 2 postgraduate Licenciado/ L6 Tecnólogo L4 Título profesional (technological institutions) (universities) 2-3 work experience L4 1 Técnico profesional L4 (technical training institutes) undergraduate 5-7 2 Examen de Estado/ICFES L4 Certificado de Aptitud L4 (state exam) profesional – CAP (SENA) ½ -1 Bachiller Académico L4 Bachiller Técnico/Comercial L4 (educación media: upper secondary education)
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Technical Qualifications in Chemistry and Related Subjects
    Royal Society of Chemistry: Higher Technical Qualifications in chemistry and related subjects. Research report written by: Jane Powell, Lena WWW.SHIFT-MEMBERSHIP.CO.UK Karlin, Tilly Barkway and Octavia Browett ©SHIFT INSIGHT 2020 Executive summary Methods Learners' journeys This report follows a literature review phase • Learners of HTQs choose them because they need a more accessible learning and presents findings from 51 qualitative interviews route or have a preference for a more applied, rather than academic, qualification. with employers, providers and learners of Higher • HTQs have diverse and mixed cohorts and tend to bring together learners from Technical Qualifications*. a wide range of work and educational backgrounds, genders and age groups. Qualitative evidence indicates that HTQs are more inclusive for non-traditional Providers' needs learners compared to university degrees. • Accounts of employers, providers and learners suggest HTQs are used to achieve • The sector is volatile, with providers describing a triple purpose: as an entry route to a variety of industries; to achieve how they responded to changing conditions progression and promotion within their current workplace or sector; and to by switching, tweaking and considering new progress into science-based undergraduate courses. HTQs currently seem to be HTQs. more successful at facilitating the last two outcomes, as school leavers with no • The reported cohort sizes were usually small and relevant work experience sometimes have a poor understanding of the diversity, could fluctuate considerably year on year, with or specifics, of careers these qualifications can lead to. projected demand sometimes not materialising in enrolments. Employers' perceptions • Individual cases suggest employer engagement • While most employers indicated that they did not have a shortage of applicants is important in making new HTQs viable.
    [Show full text]