Public Examinations Examined

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Examinations Examined Public Examinations Examined Public Examinations igh-stakes public examinations exert a dominant influence in most education systems. They affect both teacher and student behavior, especially at the middle and upper levels Hof secondary education. The content of past examinations tends to dictate what is taught and how it is taught and, more important, what is learned and how it is learned. By changing aspects of these examinations, especially their content and format, education systems can have a strong positive impact on teacher behavior and student learning, help raise student achieve- ment levels, and better prepare students for tertiary-level education and for employment. Ex- amination agencies, many of which have followed the same procedures over decades, can learn from the successes and failures of other systems. This book addresses current issues related to the development, administration, scoring, and usage of these high-stakes public examinations, identifying key issues and problems related to examinations in many emerging market economies as well as in advanced economies. The book’s primary audience consists of public examination officials on national, regional, and state examination boards, but the book should also be of interest to senior education policy makers concerned with certification and learning achievement standards, to academics and researchers interested in educational assessment, to governmental and education agencies responsible for student selection, and to professionals at development organizations. “ This extremely well-written and comprehensive book offers a timely review of the diversity of public examination practices worldwide; of the tensions between examinations and learning; and of the technical expertise involved in the creation of valid, reliable, and fair assessments. It reminds us that as “the diploma disease” takes hold with an ever-greater intensity at every stage of education worldwide, and the commercial business of testing flourishes, those con- cerned with educational quality and meaningful learning must be on guard to prevent the assessment tail wagging the educational dog.” Angela W. Little, Professor Emerita, Institute of Education, University College London “ This book is very well structured and written and draws on the authors’ remarkable global knowledge across countries and histories. It will be a great asset both to administrators and Greaney Kellaghan responsible for examinations and to academics and other professionals who seek to understand the nature and impact of examinations of different types and in different settings.” Mark Bray, UNESCO Chair Professor of Comparative Education, University of Hong Kong; and former Director, UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning “ I am sure that Public Examinations Examined, which thoroughly analyzes the practice of public examinations in different countries and makes profound and well-grounded conclusions, will arouse very great interest and will serve to further improve public examinations.” Victor Bolotov, Distinguished Professor, Higher School of Economics, National Research University, Moscow; member, Russian Academy of Education; and former Deputy Minister of Education, Russian Federation ISBN 978-1-4648-1418-1 SKU 211418 PUblicExams_Full.indd 1 10/21/19 3:58 PM Public Examinations Examined Public Examinations Examined Thomas Kellaghan and Vincent Greaney © 2020 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved. 1 2 3 4 22 21 20 19 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: Kellaghan, Thomas, and Vincent Greaney. 2020. Public Examinations Examined. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1418-1. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO. Translations—If you create a translation of this work, please add the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This translation was not created by The World Bank and should not be considered an official World Bank translation. The World Bank shall not be liable for any content or error in this translation. Adaptations—If you create an adaptation of this work, please add the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This is an adaptation of an original work by The World Bank. Views and opinions expressed in the adaptation are the sole responsibility of the author or authors of the adaptation and are not endorsed by The World Bank. Third-party content—The World Bank does not necessarily own each component of the content contained within the work. The World Bank therefore does not warrant that the use of any third-party-owned individual component or part contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of those third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. If you wish to reuse a component of the work, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that reuse and to obtain permission from the copyright owner. Examples of components can include, but are not limited to, tables, figures, or images. All queries on rights and licenses should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; e-mail: [email protected]. ISBN (paper): 978-1-4648-1418-1 ISBN (electronic): 978-1-4648-1419-8 DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1418-1 Cover design: Debra Naylor, Naylor Design. Cover illustration: Danielle Willis. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data has been requested. CONTENTS Foreword ........................................................................................................................ xi Preface ......................................................................................................................... xiii About the Authors ....................................................................................................... xvii 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................... 1 Overview ...................................................................................................................1 Public Examinations, Classroom Assessment, and System Assessment .......................4 Variety in Examination Systems .................................................................................6 Major Public Examination Traditions .........................................................................8 The Contents of This Book ......................................................................................11 Notes .......................................................................................................................12 References ...............................................................................................................13 2 CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS OF PUBLIC EXAMINATIONS .................................................................................... 17 Introduction .............................................................................................................17 Characteristics of Public Examinations ....................................................................17 Functions of Examinations .......................................................................................19 Differences among Examination Systems.................................................................28 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................35 Notes .......................................................................................................................37 References ...............................................................................................................38 3 A BRIEF HISTORY OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS .......................... 43 Introduction .............................................................................................................43 Examinations in Imperial China ...............................................................................44 Examinations in Europe, 1400– ...............................................................................49 Public Examinations in Developing Economies .......................................................54 Examinations in Former Socialist Countries .............................................................56
Recommended publications
  • Assessment for Qualification and Certification in Upper Secondary Education: a Stefanie Dufaux Review of Country Practices and Research Evidence
    OECD Education Working Papers No. 83 Assessment for Qualification and Certification in Upper Secondary Education: A Stefanie Dufaux Review of Country Practices and Research Evidence https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k92zp1cshvb-en Unclassified EDU/WKP(2012)20 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 04-Sep-2012 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR EDUCATION Unclassified EDU/WKP(2012)20 ASSESSMENT FOR QUALIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION IN UPPER SECONDARY EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF COUNTRY PRACTICES AND RESEARCH EVIDENCE OECD Education Working Paper No. 83 by Stefanie Dufaux This paper was prepared by Stefanie Dufaux, who joined the OECD Directorate for Education in September 2010 as a Carlo Schmid Fellow, and worked as a Consultant in the Education and Training Policy Division until July 2011. This paper is part of the work undertaken by the OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes. The OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes is designed to respond to the strong interest in evaluation and assessment issues evident at national and international levels. The overall purpose is to explore how systems of evaluation and assessment can be used to improve the quality, equity and efficiency of school education. The Review looks at the various components of assessment and evaluation frameworks that countries use with the objective of improving student outcomes. These include student assessment, teacher appraisal, school assessment and system evaluation. More information is available at: www.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy. Contacts: Ms. Deborah Nusche [Tel: +33(0) 1 45 24 78 01; e-mail: [email protected]] and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Cram Schools and Entrance Exam Washback
    The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics Vol. 3 No. 1, 2016, pp. 54-67 A A J L Japanese cram schools and entrance exam washback David Allen Foreign Language Education Centre, Ochanomizu University University English entrance exams are commonplace in Japan and competition for entrance to high-ranking institutions is fierce. Given the high-stakes nature of such exams, high school leavers typically attend exam preparation courses at juku cram schools. Juku are part of the shadow education sector, which has a huge presence in the East Asian region but which has escaped the attention of language education researchers. Moreover, while the entrance exams have been summarily criticized, limited empirical research exists into the washback effect upon students’ language learning. The present study constitutes a medium-scale investigation into the learning behaviour, experiences and language proficiency of 133 undergraduate students at a prestigious Japanese university, all of whom had attended juku prior to entering university. Survey and interview data clearly show a focus on reading, grammar, and test-taking techniques, and a complete lack of focus on speaking skills. The focus on receptive abilities is also reflected in language proficiency scores on IELTS Tests taken during the first year at university. Washback from the entrance exams on language learning is discussed within the context of juku cram schools in Japan. Keywords: Washback; Japan; shadow education; cram school; university entrance exam; IELTS Introduction Every year millions of students around the world sit high-stakes examinations that determine university admission. In Asia, the university entrance exam phenomenon occurs on an unprecedented scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Diploma Equivalency List
    Diploma equivalency list International applicants should have a foreign equivalent of the Dutch VWO-Diploma (pre-university education). You can check whether your diploma meets this requirement in this diploma equivalency list. Please note that this does not guarantee admission, nor can you derive rights from this list. Note as well that, depending on the Bachelor’s programme of your choice, subject-specific requirements and/or language requirements may apply. Please refer to the webpages of the Bachelor's programme of your choice for detailed information. If your diploma is not listed, it may still be an equivalent of the Dutch VWO-Diploma, but additional requirements regarding subjects taken and grades obtained may apply. For details, please feel free to contact the Admissions Office. Country Name Diploma Albania Diplomë e Maturës Shtetërore Aruba Arubaans VWO-Diploma Austria Reifeprüfungszeugnis or Reife- und Diplomprüfungszeugnis Belgium (Flanders) Diploma van Secundair Onderwijs, Algemeen Secundair Onderwijs (ASO); TSO and KSO to be checked on an individual basis Belgium (Wallonia) Certificat d'Enseignement Secondaire Supérieur, Enseignement Général Bosnia and Herzegovina Diploma o Položenom Maturskom Ispitu (RS)/Diploma o Završenoj Srednjoj školi (FiBH)(Secondary School Leaving Diploma) Bulgaria Diploma za Sredno Obrazovanie Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Examinations (CAPE): CAPE is Examinations (CAPE) required with three double units (Unit 1 + 2) in three general/academic subjects Croatia Maturalna
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education Entrance Qualifications and Exams in Europe: a Comparison
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES CULTURE AND EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION ENTRANCE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXAMS IN EUROPE: A COMPARISON STUDY This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Culture and Education. AUTHORS Cecile Hoareau McGrath, Marie Louise Henham, Anne Corbett, Niccolo Durazzi, Michael Frearson, Barbara Janta, Bregtje W. Kamphuis, Eriko Katashiro, Nina Brankovic, Benoit Guerin, Catriona Manville, Inga Schwartz, Daniel Schweppenstedde RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Markus J. Prutsch Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE Lyna Pärt LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Translation: DE, FR ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in May 2014 Brussels © European Union, 2014 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES CULTURE AND EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION ENTRANCE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXAMS IN EUROPE: A COMPARISON STUDY Abstract The study analyses admission systems to higher education across ten countries, covering some countries of the European Union (France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom), a candidate country (Turkey) as well as commonly used international comparators (Australia, Japan and the US).
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from PISA for Japan
    Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education Lessons from PISA for Japan For decades Japan has remained at or near the top of international assessments of student learning; and in the past decade, students in Japan have become more engaged in learning. However, the government Strong Performers and aspires to improve learning outcomes even further. Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education: Lessons from PISA for Japan focuses on how Japan is reforming its education system not only to produce Successful Reformers in Education better learning outcomes, but to equip students with the skills they need to navigate through the unpredictable labour market of the future and to participate in society as active citizens. This is the second in a series of reports examining how education systems are handling the challenge Lessons from PISA for Japan of preparing their students for a world of interconnected populations, rapid technological change, and Japan Strongfor Performers PISA Successfulfrom Lessonsand Education Reformers in instantaneous availability of vast amounts of information. Like the fi rst volume, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education: Lessons from PISA for the United States, this report presents examples from other countries with consistently high-performing education systems or countries that, by redesigning policies and practices, have been able to improve their education outcomes, as measured by the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), the world’s most comprehensive and rigorous survey of students’ skills and attitudes towards learning. Contents Chapter 1. How is Technology Changing Demand for Human Skills? Chapter 2. Viewing Education in Japan through the Prism of PISA Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany and Austria
    Credentials Evaluation Service Germany and Austria Sprechen Sie Deutsch? How Not to Be Overwhelmed by Credentials in German Presented at the 2012 NAFSA (Association of International Educators) Region XII Conference in San Jose, CA. Presenters: Andrej Molchan, Senior Evaluator Emily Tse, Director of Evaluations This session covered the rich educational systems of Germany and Austria, including the complex vocational and technical offerings which they offer. The presentation also addressed recent reforms and common areas of confusion, by breaking down their educational pathways and terminology. Sprechen Sie Deutsch? How Not to be Overwhelmed by Credentials in German NAFSA XII October 24, 2012 Introduction Presenters: - Andrej Molchan Evaluator - Emily Tse Director of Evaluations Educational Systems: Germany and Austria -Austria annexed in 1938 -Gained independence in 1955 Background • Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Federal Republic of Germany) • Reunification in 1990 • 16 Bundesländer (Federal States) • Population of over 80 million Accreditation • Education is governed by each of the 16 federal states • Coordinated by the federal government through the Kultusministerskonferenz (Cultural Ministers’ Conference) • University documents are issued by the post-secondary institution (with the exception of law, teaching, and medicine) • Since 2002, all new degree programs are accredited by one of the accreditation bodies regulated by the Akkreditierungsrat (Accreditation Council) • Recognition of higher education institutions and degree programs
    [Show full text]
  • Sistema De Acceso a La Universidad Española
    Sistema de acceso a la universidad española Rocío Villaverde Carnevali Directora Técnica Esta foto de Autor desconocido está bajo licencia CC BY-NC-ND Procedimiento de Acceso 1. Los distritos universitarios aceptan exclusivamente la acreditación de la UNED en el procedimiento de acceso para estudiantes tipo UE. 2. Consecuencia: en el marco jurídico actual no cabe la posibilidad de hacer exámenes de acceso. (En el marco jurídico de la Selectividad o de la LOMCE sí era posible) 3. La Calificación de Acceso a la Universidad (CAU) podrá alcanzar un máximo de 10 puntos, que resultan de la nota del título de Abitur convertida a una escala numérica de 0 a 10 mediante una fórmula matemática. 4. La Nota de Admisión podrá alcanzar hasta 14 puntos y se obtendrá a través de la suma: de la CAU y de la utilización de otros parámetros, que veremos más adelante y que no son iguales en todos los distritos universitarios. ¿Qué es UNEDasiss? ¿A quién se dirige? • UNEDassis es un servicio de la UNED creado para la gestión del acceso y de la admisión de estudiantes a las universidades españolas. • Está especialmente dirigido a los estudiantes internacionales, entre otros a los estudiantes de la Unión Europea con convenio de reciprocidad en materia de acceso a las universidades. Sistemas Educativos incluidos en este apartado: Alemania, Andorra, Austria, Bachillerato Internacional, Bélgica, Bulgaria, Chequia, China, Chipre, Croacia, Dinamarca, Escuelas Europeas, Eslovaquia, Eslovenia, Estonia, Finlandia, Francia, Grecia, Hungría, Irlanda, Islandia, Italia, Letonia, Liechtenstein, Lituania, Luxemburgo, Malta, Noruega, Países Bajos, Polonia, Portugal, Reino Unido, Rumania, Suecia y Suiza.
    [Show full text]
  • National Qualifications Framework Developments in Europe 2017
    ENENEN NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENTS IN EUROPE 2017 National qualifications framework developments in Europe 2017 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 Please cite this publication as: Cedefop (2018). National qualifications framework developments in Europe 2017. Luxembourg: Publications Office. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/029873 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 Copyright © European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), 2018 All rights reserved. PRINT ISBN: 78-92-896-2649-1 doi:10.2801/545730 TI-01-18-117-EN-C PDF ISBN: 978-92-896-2650-7 doi:10.2801/029873 TI-01-18-117-EN-N Designed by Missing Element Prague Printed in the European Union The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) is the European Union’s reference centre for vocational education and training. We provide information on and analyses of vocational education and training systems, policies, research and practice. Cedefop was established in 1975 by Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75. Europe 123, 570 01 Thessaloniki (Pylea), GREECE PO Box 22427, 551 02 Thessaloniki, GREECE Tel. +30 2310490111, Fax +30 2310490020 E-mail: [email protected] www.cedefop.europa.eu Joachim James Calleja, Director Tatjana Babrauskiene, Chair of the Governing Board Foreword Cedefop has been working on transparency and recognition of qualifications since the 1980s and has helped shape the European qualifications framework (EQF), adopted in 2008 and revised in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • The Private Tutoring Scenario: Contributions to a Comparative Analysis
    The private tutoring scenario: contributions to a comparative analysis Alexandre Ventura António Neto-Mendes Jorge Adelino Costa Sara Azevedo Department of Educational Sciences University of Aveiro Portugal Comunicação na XXII CESE Conference – Changing knowledge and education: communities, information societies and mobilities. The World in Europe – Europe in the World, Granada, 3 a 6 de Julho de 2006, ISBN 84-8491665-0. 1 The private tutoring scenario: contributions to a comparative analysis1 Alexandre Ventura António Neto-Mendes Jorge Adelino Costa Sara Azevedo Department of Educational Sciences University of Aveiro Portugal Abstract – Private tutoring, which we will analyse in this paper, has earned our attention due to several reasons: i) the fact that it is practically a worldwide phenomenon, even though educational systems vary from country to country; ii) the fact that the repercussions of private tutoring on pupils’ results may provoke a reequation of equity and equality of opportunity principles; iii) the belief that the financial costs sustained by the pupils’ families, on one hand, and the rising number of private tutors available (working part-time or full-time), on the other, grant this phenomenon a considerable social and economic importance. This approach privileges a qualitative analysis of the private tutoring scenario, with the aim of getting to know better some of its forms: its exercise as the sole employment of the tutor or as a supplement to the salary earned in another activity; private tutoring as a self-employment or employee activity; private tutoring that takes place in a local tutoring centre; private tutoring that takes place in a tutoring franchise, at a national or multinational level.
    [Show full text]
  • Due Distinction: Elite Student Status Hierarchies in China
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Due Distinction: Elite Student Status Hierarchies In China Yi-Lin Chiang University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Chiang, Yi-Lin, "Due Distinction: Elite Student Status Hierarchies In China" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2806. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2806 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2806 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Due Distinction: Elite Student Status Hierarchies In China Abstract How do students sort each other into different status groups in school? Research primarily conducted in the United States conceptualizes student status hierarchies as multidimensional systems. Scholars portray multidimensional status systems as exclusionary, constructed by and in the best interests of high status students, and disconnected from adult society. However, these theories are less useful for understanding a unidimensional status hierarchy that determines student status based on a single dimension. This study challenges several assumptions based on multidimensional status hierarchies about status hierarchies by providing insights into how unidimensional status hierarchies are constructed, maintained, and justified. Data for this study come from 15 months of ethnography and interviews with 36 socioeconomically elite students, parents, and teachers at six top performing high schools in Beijing. First, I found that Chinese high school students established a unidimensional status hierarchy based solely on test scores, with the students who achieved the highest test scores on daily practice tests having the highest status. Students sorted each other into four status groups: Intellectuals (Xueshen), Studyholics (Xueba), Underachievers (Xuezha), and Losers (Xueruo).
    [Show full text]
  • Country Qualifications Grade Range Equivalence ` Subject Equivalence - A'level
    COUNTRY QUALIFICATIONS GRADE RANGE EQUIVALENCE ` SUBJECT EQUIVALENCE - A'LEVEL A-levels A*A*A* A*A*A A*AA AAA AAB ABB BBB BBC A* A B C Austria Reifeprufungszeugnis/Maturazeugnis Pass your Pass your Pass your Pass your Pass your Pass your Pass your Pass your 1 1 2 Reifeprufung mit Reifeprufung mit Reifeprufung mit Reifeprufung mit Reifeprufung mit Reifeprufung mit Reifeprufung Reifeprufung ausgezeichnetem ausgezeichnetem ausgezeichnete ausgezeichnete gutem Erfolg gutem Erfolg mit gutem Bestanden, with Erfolg, with four Erfolg bestanden, m Erfolg, m Erfolg bestanden, with bestanden, with Erfolg threer subjects subjects(written with four bestanden with bestanden, with three one bestanden , with (written exam) at exams) at 1/sehr gut subjects(written four three subjects(written subject(written one 2/gut and one exams) at 1/sehr subjects(written subjects(written exams) at exams) at subject(written subject (wriiten gut exams) at exams) at 1/sehr gut and 1/sehr gut and exams) at exam) at 1/sehr gut 1/sehr gut and one subject three subjects 1/sehr gut and 3/Befriedigend one subject (written exam) (written exam) three (written exam) at 2/gut at 2/gut subjects(written at 2/gut exam) at 2/gut Belgium Certificat d'Enseignement Secondaire 10/10 or 20/20 or 9.5/10 or 18.5/20 9/10 or 18/20 or 8.5/10 or 8/10 or 16/20 or 7.5/10 or 7/10 or 14/20 or 6.5/10 or 9/10 or 8/10 or 7/10 or 14/20 Supérieur/ Diploma van Secundair 90% overall or 85% overall 80% overall 16.5/20 or 78% 75% overall 14.5/20 or 73% 70% overall 13.5/20 or 68% 18/20 16/20 Onderwijs overall
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation
    International Qualifications Assessment Service (IQAS) Government of Alberta COUNTRY EDUCATION PROFILE The Former USSR and the Russian Federation 2 Prepared by: International Qualifications Assessment Service (IQAS) Contact Information: International Qualifications Assessment Service (IQAS) 9th Floor, 108 Street Building, 9942 ­ 108 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2J5 Phone: 1 (780) 427­2655 Fax: 1 (780) 422­9734 © 2007 the Crown in right of the Province of Alberta, International Qualifications Assessment Service (IQAS) 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................................ 4 LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................................................. 7 LIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................................................. 10 COUNTRY OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................... 11 HISTORICAL EDUCATION OVERVIEW........................................................................................ 17 EDUCATION IN THE FORMER USSR................................................................................................... 17 EDUCATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AFTER 1991 .................................................................... 20 SCHOOL EDUCATION .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]