DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Canadian Armoured Brigade and the Battle of Lake

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Canadian Armoured Brigade and the Battle of Lake 1 CANADIAN ARMOURED BRIGADE AND THE BATTLE OF LAKE TRASIMENE, 20-28 JUNE 1944 by William John Pratt Bachelor of Arts, University of Victoria, 2008 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts in the Graduate Academic Unit of History Supervisor: Marc Milner, PhD, History Examining Board: David Charters, PhD, History Marc Milner, PhD, History Larry Wisniewski, PhD, Sociology This thesis is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK May, 2010 © William Pratt, 2010 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du 1+1 Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87614-5 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87614-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privee, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de thesis. cette these. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. Canada ABSTRACT On 20-28 June 1944, the 1 Canadian Armoured Brigade, supporting the XIII British Corps, participated in the Battle of Lake Trasimene, north of Rome. This understudied event in the Italian Campaign defies established notions about the nature of the Second World War. Undertaken against entrenched enemy in rolling countryside, the battle reveals that Anglo-Canadian tank-infantry cooperation was the decisive factor on the battlefield. The troopers of the Ontario, Three Rivers, and Calgary Armoured Regiments were aggressive to a fault, providing direct firepower support and overcoming obstacles which would otherwise put the infantry to ground. Sherman tanks proved effective in the street-fighting role and destroyed several of the famous German Panther tanks. Ultimately the XIII Corps paid a high price to prosecute the Italian campaign's containment strategy. This study offers an examination of combined arms in success and failure, and situates armour as a vital component of the all-arms team. ii DEDICATION To the soldiers of the Ontario, Three Rivers and Calgary Armoured Regiments, who made the ultimate sacrifice, this work is humbly dedicated. May their efforts be understood and remembered. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank Lee Windsor for his guidance on this work. His encyclopaedic knowledge of the Italian campaign is the foundation of this thesis. Walking the ground on his 2009 battlefield tour was an experience I will never forget. Marc Milner was an excellent adviser and editor, and was always willing and able to turn a draft over with remarkable efficiency. Both Marc and Lee's friendly manner and lack of pretension are a part of the Gregg Centre way, and made for an enjoyable tenure at the University of New Brunswick. Brent Wilson and Valerie Gallant were the consistent denizens of the Centre. A chat with them all was always uplifting. My fellow graduate students at the University of New Brunswick provided a useful sounding board for ideas. Their comradeship was appreciated and will be missed. While these are too numerous to name, some may be singled out for the contribution to this thesis. Charley Eddy, a fellow Italian campaign enthusiast, commented on the prospectus and an early thesis proposal and was always keen to talk shop. Eric Greisinger critiqued the prospectus. It is my hope that his empathy for the common soldier affected this thesis. Joseph Zeller edited and reduced a leviathan draft. Jamie Horncastle, Scott Leslie, Iain O'Shea, and Joseph Zeller engaged in numerous discussion on warfare and history, and could commiserate when the writing got tough. Geoff Keelan and Christine Leppard kindly shared their own research. Christine directed me to Calgary Regiment archivist A1 Judson, who was a wealth of information. The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, the Security and Defence Forum, the Gregg Centre for the Study of War and Society, and the University of New Brunswick provided appreciated financial support. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ii DEDICATION iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF FIGURES vii 1.0 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION: Missing from the Narrative: Towards a Complete Account of the Battle of Lake Trasimene 1 1.1 The Battle of Lake Trasimene and Official History 1 1.2 Armoured Development, 1916-1940 9 1.3 The Blitzkrieg Standard and Explanations for British Armoured Failings 14 2.0 CHAPTER TWO: Precursor to Trasimene: 1 Canadian Armoured Brigade's Training and Operations 18 2.1 Formation and Training of the 1 Canadian Army Tank Brigade.. 18 2.2 Operations from HUSKY to DIADEM 27 3.0 CHAPTER THREE: Grand Strategy and Pursuit, May-June 1944 41 3.1 Grand Strategy: Resource Management in a World War 41 3.2 Army Group Strategy: Pursuit from the Gustav to the Dora Line 43 3.3 German Consolidation: From the Dora to the Albert Line 53 4.0 CHAPTER FOUR: The Vicious Encounter Battle: Vaiano and Sanfatucchio 62 4.1 XIII Corps Approaches the Trasimene Line 62 4.2 Sanfatucchio Village 19-21 June: Close Support Shermans in Urban Operations 77 4.3 The Inniskillings Bite and Hold Pucciarelli, 21-22 June 91 4.4 Vaiano 23-24: The Nadir of Tank-Infantry Cooperation 99 5.0 CHAPTER FIVE: Through the Battle Outposts and Into the Main Defensive Line 24-27 June 1944 108 5.1 Panthers at Pescia 108 5.2 Across the River Pescia 24-25 June 115 5.3 4th Division Advances Through the Hilltop Villages 120 6.0 CHAPTER SIX: Breaking the Main Defensive Line 28 June 126 6.1 Sacrifice Beyond Casamaggiore 126 v 6.2Clearing the Hill Country and Pursuit, 29 June-3 July 136 7.0 CHAPTER SEVEN: Conclusion 149 8.0 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY. 153 9.0 APPENDIX ONE: Selected XIII Corps Order of Battle and Command 163 10.0 APPENDIX TWO: Selected XIII Corps Casualties 165 11.0 CURRICULUM VITAE vi LIST OF FIGURES I.0 FIGURE ONE: Canadians in Southern Italy 30 2.0 FIGURE TWO: Approach and Breakthrough, The Hitler Line 15-23 May 1944 45 3.0 FIGURE THREE: Advance From Rome 5-11 June 49 4.0 FIGURE FOUR: Pursuit From Dora to Albert Line 10-20 June 1944 55 5.0 FIGURE FIVE: XIII Corps' Front at the Trasimene Line 68 6.0 FIGURE SIX: No.l Operational Research Section Appreciation of Trasimene Defences 70 7.0 FIGURE SEVEN: The Battle of Lake Trasimeno 72 8.0 FIGURE EIGHT: 36 Brigade and Wiltshire's Centre Line 75 9.0 FIGURE NINE: Contemporary View From Villa Strada North-west to Vaiano 77 10.0 FIGURE TEN: Battle of Sanfatucchio 78 II.0 FIGURE ELEVEN: Contemporary View from Castiglione del Lago South to Sanfatucchio 81 12.0 FIGURE TWELVE: 'H' Company London Irish Rifles, 'B' Squadron Ontario Regiment 87 13.0 FIGURE THIRTEEN: German Prisoners in Sanfatucchio 21 June 89 14.0 FIGURE FOURTEEN: 6th Inniskillings advance through Pucciarelli with Ontario Regiment Sherman in Foreground 94 15.0 FIGURE FIFTEEN: Air Photo, Pescia Crossing Ill 16.0 FIGURE SIXTEEN: Vaiano to Casamaggiore 121 17.0 FIGURE SEVENTEEN-.The Trasimene Line 127 18.0 FIGURE EIGHTEEN: Casamaggiore 28 June 128 vii 19.0 FIGURE NINETEEN: Laviano to Petrignano viii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION: Missing from the Narrative: Towards a Complete Account of the Battle of Lake Trasimene The Battle of Lake Trasimene and Official History The modern Battle of Lake Trasimene, where 1 Canadian Armoured Brigade (1CAB) fought in support of the 4th and 78th British Divisions, is a forgotten battle of the Italian campaign. This is unfortunate, because the battle demonstrated the importance of tank support and success in the all-arms team. An in-depth operational study of the Battle of Lake Trasimene is therefore long overdue. Moreover, a case-study of the XIII British Corps' use of this Canadian independent infantry-tank brigade provides an investigation of historically derided Allied tank-infantry cooperation. It offers a corrective to the dominant historical narrative which claims that Anglo-Canadian infantry-tank brigades were a flawed concept. The study shows that despite the rhetoric which claims that the mountainous Italian peninsula was not tank country, armour remained a vital component of the all-arms team, offering direct fire support to the infantry and allowing them to advance. A study of the operations of 1CAB during the Battle of the Trasimene Line addresses several overlapping historical narratives surrounding the battle: the Italian campaign proper; Canadian, British, and German Army history; and armoured operations in the Second World War.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To the Ombrone-Orcia Valley
    CHAPTER IV ............... To the Ombrone-Orcia Valley r\.T noon on n June Fifth Army pursued the Germans northwestward with two fresh command groups directing operations. IV Corps was on the left and the FEC on the right after completion of their relief of VI Corps and II Corps respectively. Comparatively fresh troops were available for the continuance of the chase, especially in the French zone where the two FEC divisions initially committed, the 1st Motor­ ized Division and the 3d Algerian Infantry Division, had been out of heavy com­ bat nearly two weeks. Only one American division, the 36th, was in action on the IV Corps side. It had been following behind the swift advance of Combat Command A of the 1st Armored Division north of Rome. Although its men had been con­ stantly on the move since passing Rome, it had not been engaged in any extensive righting, its action behind the armor having been confined largely to mopping up operations. The 361st Regimental Combat Team was attached, giving the 36th Di­ vision four regimental combat teams. The 34th Division was resting in the vicinity of Tarquinia, where it had moved from Civitavecchia to make way for supply depots being set up near the port. The 1st Armored Division was rehabilitating near Bracciano, and the other two French divisions, the 26. Moroccan Infantry Division and the 4th Mountain Division, were in FEC reserve. The 85th and 88th Divisions were en route to rest areas south and west of Rome. Other American and British divisions around Rome were in the process of leaving Fifth Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents from the Archive of Scuola Normale Superiore Presented By
    Exposition - documents from the archive of Scuola Normale Superiore Presented by: Alberto Lusiani - Physics researcher at SNS Maddalena Taglioli - Head archivist at SNS Chiara Visentin – SNS Student, Virtual Immersion in Science Scuola Normale Superiore of Pisa was formally founded in 1810, by a Napoleonic decree which dealt with “places of public instruction” in Tuscany, part of the French empire since 1807 and referred to as the departments of Arno, Ombrone and Mediterraneo in the terminology used in revolutionary France at that time. Scuola Normale was to be a subsidiary of École Normale Supérieure of Paris, granting 25 publicly funded places, for students in the humanities and sciences. Scuola Normale began operating in 1813 and only for one year, as in April 1814 Napoleon was forced to abdicate. “Normale” refers to the mission of the school, which was to train middle and high school teachers able to convey “norms” in a context where training teachers was connected to “forming” citizens loyal to the laws and the emperor. Scuola Normale and École Normale did not initially have the denomination “Superiore / Supérieure”. In France, after the institution of the “Écoles Normales primaries” in 1845, the School was denominated “École Normale Supérieure”. In 1846, the grand duke of Tuscany, Leopold III, established the “Scuola Normale Toscana”, also called the “ Scuola Normale of the Imperial Reign” - as it was then connected to the “Theoretical and Practical” Austro-Hungarian system – designed “to train teachers and masters for secondary schools”. After the Italian unifcation, the “Scuola Normale of the Kingdom of Italy” was formally established in 1862.
    [Show full text]
  • 6Th South African Armoured Division
    6TH SOUTH AFRICAN ARMOURED DIVISION By J.C. von Winterbach, Scott Sutherland, Mike Bersiks, Rex Barret and Barry Cooper. Beginning The idea of a South African Armoured Division was born out of the chaos of the Western Desert Campaign, the Of- ficers in the 1st and 2nd South African Infantry Divisions felt the need for their own armour instead of depending on other Commonwealth Armoured Units. The formation of two strong Armoured Divisions was first discussed between Lt. Gen. G. E. Brink and rimeP Minister (Field Marshal) J.C. Smuts in April 1941. At that point time, South Africa was struggling to maintain the manpo- wer needed to sustain the 1st and 2nd Infantry Divisions in the field due to the political divisions in the Country. The 3rd South African Infantry Division was based in South Africa and provided the pool from which reinforcements were drawn to supplement the 1st and 2nd Infantry Divisions. A re-organisation committee met for the first time in May 1942 to discuss the armour option, it was decided to send three Infantry Battalions for armour training in August 1942, but the plan was rudely interrupted when Rommel launched his attack on the Gazala line in late May 1942. Nine days after the final El Alamein offensive the South African Divisions were pulling back to regroup. The plan was for the 1st Infantry Division that was withdrawn to Quassasin and that its 1st Brigade would return to South Africa to regroup with the 7th Infantry Brigade in Madagascar to form the 1st South African Armoured Division and the 1st Infantry Divisions 2nd and 3rd Brigades would remain in Egypt to form the 6th South African Armoured Division, which would replace the 2nd Infantry Division that had been captured at Tobruk in June 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • Order of Battle, Mid-September 1940 Army Group a Commander-In-Chief
    Operation “Seelöwe” (Sea Lion) Order of Battle, mid-September 1940 Army Group A Commander-in-Chief: Generalfeldmarschall Gerd von Rundstedt Chief of the General Staff: General der Infanterie Georg von Sodenstern Operations Officer (Ia): Oberst Günther Blumentritt 16th Army Commander-in-Chief: Generaloberst Ernst Busch Chief of the General Staff: Generalleutnant Walter Model Operations Officer (Ia): Oberst Hans Boeckh-Behrens Luftwaffe Commander (Koluft) 16th Army: Oberst Dr. med. dent. Walter Gnamm Division Command z.b.V. 454: Charakter als Generalleutnant Rudolf Krantz (This staff served as the 16th Army’s Heimatstab or Home Staff Unit, which managed the assembly and loading of all troops, equipment and supplies; provided command and logistical support for all forces still on the Continent; and the reception and further transport of wounded and prisoners of war as well as damaged equipment. General der Infanterie Albrecht Schubert’s XXIII Army Corps served as the 16th Army’s Befehlsstelle Festland or Mainland Command, which reported to the staff of Generalleutnant Krantz. The corps maintained traffic control units and loading staffs at Calais, Dunkirk, Ostend, Antwerp and Rotterdam.) FIRST WAVE XIII Army Corps: General der Panzertruppe Heinric h-Gottfried von Vietinghoff genannt Scheel (First-wave landings on English coast between Folkestone and New Romney) – Luftwaffe II./Flak-Regiment 14 attached to corps • 17th Infantry Division: Generalleutnant Herbert Loch • 35th Infantry Division: Generalleutnant Hans Wolfgang Reinhard VII Army
    [Show full text]
  • Military Tribunal, Indictments
    MILITARY TRIBUNALS Case No. 12 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -against- WILHELM' VON LEEB, HUGO SPERRLE, GEORG KARL FRIEDRICH-WILHELM VON KUECHLER, JOHANNES BLASKOWITZ, HERMANN HOTH, HANS REINHARDT. HANS VON SALMUTH, KARL HOL­ LIDT, .OTTO SCHNmWIND,. KARL VON ROQUES, HERMANN REINECKE., WALTERWARLIMONT, OTTO WOEHLER;. and RUDOLF LEHMANN. Defendants OFFICE OF MILITARY GOVERNMENT FOR GERMANY (US) NORNBERG 1947 • PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ TABLE OF CONTENTS - Page INTRODUCTORY 1 COUNT ONE-CRIMES AGAINST PEACE 6 A Austria 'and Czechoslovakia 7 B. Poland, France and The United Kingdom 9 C. Denmark and Norway 10 D. Belgium, The Netherland.; and Luxembourg 11 E. Yugoslavia and Greece 14 F. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 17 G. The United states of America 20 . , COUNT TWO-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST ENEMY BELLIGERENTS AND PRISONERS OF WAR 21 A: The "Commissar" Order , 22 B. The "Commando" Order . 23 C, Prohibited Labor of Prisoners of Wal 24 D. Murder and III Treatment of Prisoners of War 25 . COUNT THREE-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST CIVILIANS 27 A Deportation and Enslavement of Civilians . 29 B. Plunder of Public and Private Property, Wanton Destruc­ tion, and Devastation not Justified by Military Necessity. 31 C. Murder, III Treatment and Persecution 'of Civilian Popu- lations . 32 COUNT FOUR-COMMON PLAN OR CONSPIRACY 39 APPENDIX A-STATEMENT OF MILITARY POSITIONS HELD BY THE DEFENDANTS AND CO-PARTICIPANTS 40 2 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ INDICTMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Infantry Combat Training During the Second World War
    SHARPENING THE SABRE: CANADIAN INFANTRY COMBAT TRAINING DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR By R. DANIEL PELLERIN BBA (Honours), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2007 BA (Honours), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2008 MA, University of Waterloo, 2009 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in History University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario, Canada © Raymond Daniel Ryan Pellerin, Ottawa, Canada, 2016 ii ABSTRACT “Sharpening the Sabre: Canadian Infantry Combat Training during the Second World War” Author: R. Daniel Pellerin Supervisor: Serge Marc Durflinger 2016 During the Second World War, training was the Canadian Army’s longest sustained activity. Aside from isolated engagements at Hong Kong and Dieppe, the Canadians did not fight in a protracted campaign until the invasion of Sicily in July 1943. The years that Canadian infantry units spent training in the United Kingdom were formative in the history of the Canadian Army. Despite what much of the historical literature has suggested, training succeeded in making the Canadian infantry capable of succeeding in battle against German forces. Canadian infantry training showed a definite progression towards professionalism and away from a pervasive prewar mentality that the infantry was a largely unskilled arm and that training infantrymen did not require special expertise. From 1939 to 1941, Canadian infantry training suffered from problems ranging from equipment shortages to poor senior leadership. In late 1941, the Canadians were introduced to a new method of training called “battle drill,” which broke tactical manoeuvres into simple movements, encouraged initiative among junior leaders, and greatly boosted the men’s morale.
    [Show full text]
  • British Military Attitudes to Nuclear Weapons
    Preserving the character of the nation: British military attitudes to nuclear weapons Tim Street June 2015 Introduction study by considering these issues within the current domestic and international political context, particularly the impact of deep public What are the views of the British military on spending cuts and the crisis in Ukraine. This is nuclear weapons today? How can we answer this done in order to better understand the pressures question given both the different actors and the British armed forces are currently under and institutions and the level of secrecy surrounding the effect this has on the nuclear weapons this issue? Moreover, why should those debate, particularly given the concerns raised by supportive of non-proliferation and disarmament, former and serving military personnel regarding or anyone else- especially given the political the government’s approach to defence and the nature of these weapons- care what the military strategy underpinning it in recent years. For thinks? As a study published by the Nuclear example, the determination of the government to Education Trust (NET) and Nuclear Information build four new nuclear-armed submarines in order Service (NIS) this week entitled British Military to maintain continuous-at-sea-deterrence (CASD), Attitudes to Nuclear Weapons and Disarmament whereby a submarine is perpetually on deterrent states ‘The armed forces have a unique patrol, ‘threatens to be at the expense of further relationship with and experience of the country’s reduction in conventional forces’
    [Show full text]
  • REFERENCE BOOK Table of Contents Designer’S Notes
    REFERENCE BOOK Table of Contents Designer’s Notes ............................................................ 2 31.0 Mapmaker’s Notes ................................................. 40 26.0 Footnoted Entries ........................................... 2 32.0 Order of Battle ....................................................... 41 27.0 Game Elements .............................................. 13 33.0 Selected Sources & Recommended Reading ......... 48 28.0 Units & Weapons ........................................... 21 29.0 OB Notes ....................................................... 33 30.0 Historical Notes ............................................. 39 GMT Games, LLC • P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 www.GMTGames.com 2 Operation Dauntless Reference Book countryside characterized by small fields rimmed with thick and Designer’s Notes steeply embanked hedges and sunken roads, containing small stout I would like to acknowledge the contributions of lead researchers farms with neighbouring woods and orchards in a broken landscape. Vincent Lefavrais, A. Verspeeten, and David Hughes to the notes Studded with small villages, ideal for defensive strongpoints…” appearing in this booklet, portions of which have been lifted rather 6 Close Terrain. There are few gameplay differences between close liberally from their emails and edited by myself. These guys have terrain types. Apart from victory objectives, which are typically my gratitude for a job well done. I’m very pleased that they stuck village or woods hexes, the only differences are a +1 DRM to Re- with me to the end of this eight-year project. covery rolls in village hexes, a Modifier Chit which favors village and woods over heavy bocage, and a higher MP cost to enter woods. Furthermore, woods is the only terrain type that blocks LOS with 26.0 Footnoted Entries respect to spotting units at higher elevation. For all other purposes, close terrain is close terrain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Militia in the Interwar Years, 1919-39
    THE POLICY OF NEGLECT: THE CANADIAN MILITIA IN THE INTERWAR YEARS, 1919-39 ___________________________________________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board ___________________________________________________________ in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY __________________________________________________________ by Britton Wade MacDonald January, 2009 iii © Copyright 2008 by Britton W. MacDonald iv ABSTRACT The Policy of Neglect: The Canadian Militia in the Interwar Years, 1919-1939 Britton W. MacDonald Doctor of Philosophy Temple University, 2008 Dr. Gregory J. W. Urwin The Canadian Militia, since its beginning, has been underfunded and under-supported by the government, no matter which political party was in power. This trend continued throughout the interwar years of 1919 to 1939. During these years, the Militia’s members had to improvise a great deal of the time in their efforts to attain military effectiveness. This included much of their training, which they often funded with their own pay. They created their own training apparatuses, such as mock tanks, so that their preparations had a hint of realism. Officers designed interesting and unique exercises to challenge their personnel. All these actions helped create esprit de corps in the Militia, particularly the half composed of citizen soldiers, the Non- Permanent Active Militia. The regulars, the Permanent Active Militia (or Permanent Force), also relied on their own efforts to improve themselves as soldiers. They found intellectual nourishment in an excellent service journal, the Canadian Defence Quarterly, and British schools. The Militia learned to endure in these years because of all the trials its members faced. The interwar years are important for their impact on how the Canadian Army (as it was known after 1940) would fight the Second World War.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Army Air Forces in WWII
    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE Air Force Historical Studies Office 28 June 2011 Errata Sheet for the Air Force History and Museum Program publication: With Courage: the United States Army Air Forces in WWII, 1994, by Bernard C. Nalty, John F. Shiner, and George M. Watson. Page 215 Correct: Second Lieutenant Lloyd D. Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 218 Correct Lieutenant Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 357 Correct Hughes, Lloyd D., 215, 218 To: Hughes, Lloyd H., 215, 218 Foreword In the last decade of the twentieth century, the United States Air Force commemorates two significant benchmarks in its heritage. The first is the occasion for the publication of this book, a tribute to the men and women who served in the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War 11. The four years between 1991 and 1995 mark the fiftieth anniversary cycle of events in which the nation raised and trained an air armada and com- mitted it to operations on a scale unknown to that time. With Courage: U.S.Army Air Forces in World War ZZ retells the story of sacrifice, valor, and achievements in air campaigns against tough, determined adversaries. It describes the development of a uniquely American doctrine for the application of air power against an opponent's key industries and centers of national life, a doctrine whose legacy today is the Global Reach - Global Power strategic planning framework of the modern U.S. Air Force. The narrative integrates aspects of strategic intelligence, logistics, technology, and leadership to offer a full yet concise account of the contributions of American air power to victory in that war.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Strategic Services Versus Special Operations Executive
    Office of Strategic Services versus Special Operations Executive Competition for the Italian Resistance, 1943–1945 ✣ Tommaso Piffer Drawing on recently declassified records, this article explores the relationship between the British Special Operations Executive (SOE) and the U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS)—the wartime intelligence agencies responsible for espionage, subversion, and other covert activities—in the Italian campaign during World War II.1 Until recently, the extensive Anglo-American literature on OSS-SOE rela- tions focused mainly on the two agencies’ wartime activities in the Balkans and France. The Italian theater received relatively little attention.2 The reasons for 1. The official history of SOE in Italy was published in David Stafford, Mission Accomplished (London: Bodley Head, 2011). In English, see also Christopher Woods, “SOE in Italy,” in Mark Seaman, ed., Special Operations Executive: A New Instrument of War (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 91–102; Charles Delzell, “The American OSS and the Italian Armed Resistance,” in Renzo Amedeo, ed., Le missioni alleate e le formazioni dei partigiani autonomi nella Resistenza piemontese (Cuneo, Italy: L’Arciere, 1980), pp. 353–375; and Julie Le Gac, “From Suspicious Observation to Ambiguous Collaboration: The Allies and Italian Partisans, 1943–1944,” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. XXXI, No. 5 (October 2008), pp. 721–742. The most important scholarly accounts in Italian are Elena Aga Rossi, “Alleati e resistenza in Italia,” in Elena Aga Rossi, L’Italia nella sconfitta: Politica interna e situazione internazionale durante la seconda guerra mondiale (Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 1985), pp. 191–230; and Massimo de Leonardis, La Gran Bretagna e la resistenza partigiana in Italia: 1943–1945 (Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Shaef-Sgs-Records.Pdf
    363.6 DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS SUPREME HEADQUARTERS, ALLIED EXPEDITIONARY FORCE, OFFICE OF SECRETARY, GENERAL STAFF: Records, 1943-45 [microfilm] Accession 71-14 Processed by: DJH Date completed: June 1991 The microfilm of the records of the Secretary of the General Staff, Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force, was sent to the Eisenhower Library by the Modern Military Records Division of the National Archives in September 1969. Linear feet of shelf space occupied: 4 Number of reels of microfilm: 62 Literary rights in the SHAEF records are in the public domain. These records were processed in accordance with the general restrictions on access to government records as set forth by the National Archives. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE The Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) was a joint U.S. - British military organization created in England in February 1944 to carry out the invasion of Western Europe. Dwight D. Eisenhower, an officer of the United States Army, was appointed Supreme Allied Commander. Eisenhower organized his staff along U.S. military lines with separate staff sections devoted to personnel (G-1), intelligence (G-2), operations (G-3), logistics (G-4) and civilian affairs (G-5). The most significant files at SHAEF were kept in the Office of the Secretary of the General Staff (SGS). The SGS office served as a type of central file for SHAEF. The highest-level documents that received the personal attention of the Supreme Allied Commander and the Chief of Staff usually ended up in the SGS files. Many of the staff sections and administrative offices at SHAEF retired material to the SGS files.
    [Show full text]