Village of Lake Bluff Historic Preservation Commission Meeting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Village of Lake Bluff Historic Preservation Commission Meeting VILLAGE OF LAKE BLUFF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 11, 2020 - 7:00 P.M. VILLAGE HALL BOARD ROOM 40 E. CENTER AVENUE, LAKE BLUFF, ILLINOIS AGENDA 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Consideration of December 11, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes 3. Consideration of January 27, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes (Stonebridge Site Tour) 4. Consideration of January 30, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes (Stonebridge Advisory Review) 5. Non-Agenda Items and Visitors The Chairperson and Members of the HPC allocate fifteen (15) minutes at this time for those individuals who would like the opportunity to address the HPC on any matter within its area of responsibility that is not listed on the agenda. Each person addressing the HPC is asked to limit their comments to a maximum of three (3) minutes. 6. Presentation of Village Historic Survey 7. Staff Report a.) April Meeting Date & Stonebridge Advisory Review 8. Adjournment The Village of Lake Bluff is subject to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Individuals with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who require certain accommodations in order to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting, or who have questions regarding the accessibility of the meeting or the facilities, are requested to contact Glen Cole at 847-234-0774 or TDD number 234-2153 promptly to allow the Village of Lake Bluff to make reasonable accommodations. VILLAGE OF LAKE BLUFF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING December 11, 2019 7:00 P.M. Village Hall Board Room 40 East Center Avenue DRAFT MINUTES 1. Call to Order and Roll Call A Regular Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) of the Village of Lake Bluff was called to order on December 11, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. in the Village Hall Board Room. The following members were present: Present: Paul Bergmann Jane Jerch Lois Nicol Cheri Richardson, Vice Chair Steve Kraus, Chair Absent: Randolph Liebolt Also Present: Glen Cole, Assistant to the Village Administrator (AVA) 2. Consideration of the November 13, 2019 Meeting Minutes Member Bergmann moved to approve the November 13, 2019 HPC Regular Meeting Minutes as amended. Member Nicol seconded the motion. The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote. 3. Non-Agenda Items and Visitors Chair Kraus stated that the Chairperson and Members of the HPC allocate fifteen (15) minutes at this time for those individuals who would like the opportunity to address the HPC on any matter within its area of responsibility that is not listed on the agenda. There were no requests to address the HPC. 4. Initial Advisory Review for Demolition of the Stonebridge Estate (0-230 Jensen Lane a.k.a. 136 Green Bay Road) Chair Kraus asked staff for quick background on the property. AVA Cole stated that appropriate background information could be brought to future meetings if requested by the commission. AVA Cole went over the HPC’s role in the advisory review process and what needs to be voted on. Staff recommends having a special meeting in January due to the Page 1 of 3 Historic Preservation Commission December 11, 2019 expected interest from the public for this application. AVA Cole explained the advisory review process once the application has been submitted. AVA Cole clarified that this process could have a maximum demolition delay of 120 days, possibly an additional 30 days if an extension is given by the Village Board. AVA Cole expressed that it is vital that advisory review applications be judged in view of the goal and purpose of the Village’s historic preservation regulations as well as the criteria for advisory review; together, these consist of about 20 statements. He stated that of those 20, seven are most relevant and a list of these has been shared with the commission as a starting point. A brief discussion commenced. AVA Cole explained that there are 3 landmarked structures on the 136 Green Bay Road estate. He stated that these three structures are the Manor House, the Carriage House, and protected landscape elements. Specifically, this application proposes to demolish the Manor House, the Carriage House, and the terrace and the retaining wall on the south end of the property. Chair Kraus stated that it will be imperative to have more information regarding the full depth of the demolition application and future plans moving forward. He stated that this information would be vital to have at the future advisory review conference. As there were no comments from the commissioners, Chair Kraus opened the floor for public comment. Matt Allison, resident, came forward to address the HPC and said he resides on the northern border of the estate. He wanted to confirm that this commission is only able to delay the demolition process and cannot deny a demolition permit. AVA Cole confirmed that statement is generally true, although in this particular case, the Village Board would need to act for a permit to be issued. Mr. Allison believes that the Roanoke Group should not be allowed to own this property and that all surrounding homeowners are going to do everything in their power to force the Roanoke Group to relinquish their ownership of this property. He stated that development can occur on this property but they do not want it to be by the Roanoke Group. Katie Sekera, resident, came forward to address the HPC. She has heard that an evaluation firm out of Deerfield gave the Manor house a ‘good’ rating, which is the second best rating a structure can receive, and was curious if this carries any weight in this process along with how they can consider demolition of this structure that received this type of rating. She stated that her family chose Lake Bluff due to its beautiful community and the draw to historical importance all around the community. She believes that Roanoke Group does not care about the community and based off their past actions, she is not able to trust what they are proposing moving forward. She stated it would be extremely unfortunate if the Manor House and Carriage House are demolished and then Roanoke Group goes broke and this project stalls again. Chair Kraus emphasized that the land east of the Manor House to Green Bay Road is landmarked. A brief discussion commenced. AVA Cole read aloud letter from a resident regarding the application that was recently received and not distributed to the HPC (in error). He stated the letter was from Ted Kovas, who is a resident of Page 2 of 3 Historic Preservation Commission December 11, 2019 property abutting 136 Green Bay Road from the West. He stated it is not appropriate that the Roanoke Group could potentially be rewarded for not taking care of the Manor and Carriage House and has let them deteriorate these last eight years while the surrounding residents living in historic homes have spent substantial amounts of money to continue the historic preservation of their homes for the betterment of the Village. Once AVA Cole finished reading the letter, Chair Kraus closed the public comment session. Chair Kraus asked for a motion that determines the proposed work is inconsistent with the goals and purposes of the historic preservation chapter of the municipal code and that it is requested that the applicant to be present at an advisory review conference in January with the date to be determined. Member Jerch made a motion. Member Bergmann seconded the motion. The motion passed on the following roll call vote: Ayes: (5) Bergmann, Jerch, Nicol, Richardson, Kraus Nays: (0) Absent: (1) Liebolt Member Nicol stated she was curious if we could go visit the property before the conference. AVA Cole stated that this could be arranged. 5. Commissioner’s Report Chair Kraus discussed scheduling of the upcoming meeting. 6. Staff Report AVA Cole stated that he will be issuing a notice on behalf of the commission regarding the HPC meeting dates for 2020. Chair Kraus requested that staff book Susan Benjamin for a normal meeting in February to go over the survey. 7. Adjournment There being no further business to consider, Member Richardson motioned to adjourn. Member Nicol seconded the motion. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, the meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Glen Cole Assistant to the Village Administrator Page 3 of 3 VILLAGE OF LAKE BLUFF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING January 27, 2020 9:00 A.M. Stonebridge Development 0-230 Jensen Lane aka 136 Green Bay Road DRAFT MINUTES 1. Call to Order and Roll Call A Special Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) of the Village of Lake Bluff was called to order on January 27, 2020 at 9 a.m. at the Stonebridge Development, 0-230 Jensen Lane a.k.a. 136 Green Bay Road. The following members were present: Present: Paul Bergmann Janie Jerch Lois Nicol Steve Kraus, Chair Absent: Randolph Liebolt Cheri Richardson Also Present: Glen Cole, Assistant to the Village Administrator (AVA) Michael Croak, Building Codes Supervisor 2. Introduction and Public Comment AVA Cole called the roll and stated that a quorum of the HPC was present. He stated that this special meeting was an opportunity to tour the Stonebridge development before the HPC’s advisory review conference scheduled this Thursday. He stated that Mike Walline with the Roanoke Group would provide a tour of the facility and encouraged those taking the tour to be careful given the site conditions. He also said that there was an opportunity for members of the public to address the HPC on any matter within its area of responsibility. There were no requests to address the HPC.
Recommended publications
  • PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES HISTORICAL and ARCHITECTURAL SITES COMMISSION Preservation Design Guidelines for Decatur Historic Districts and Landmarks
    CITY OF DECATUR Historical and Architectural Sites Commission PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL SITES COMMISSION Preservation Design Guidelines for Decatur Historic Districts and Landmarks Prepared by City of Decatur Neighborhood Services Department One Gary K. Anderson Plaza Decatur, Illinois 62523-1196 Phone 217.424.2793 Published by Historical and Architectural Sites Commission 2008 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION Applying for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) ......................................................... 2 Approval Process ................................................................................................................. 3 How to use the Historic District Program Manual and Guidelines ...................................... 4 The Secretary of the Interior ................................................................................................ 5 Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation .................................................... 5 CHAPTER 2 - NEIGHBORHOODS & ARCHITECTURE Residential Structures ........................................................................................................... 7 Architectural Styles of Decatur’s Residences ...................................................................... 8 Non-Contributing Structures .............................................................................................. 10 CHAPTER 3 - NEIGHBORHOOD SETTING Trees and Landscaping ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • VILLAGE WIDE ARCHITECTURAL + HISTORICAL SURVEY Final
    VILLAGE WIDE ARCHITECTURAL + HISTORICAL SURVEY Final Survey Report August 9, 2013 Village of River Forest Historic Preservation Commission CONTENTS INTRODUCTION P. 6 Survey Mission p. 6 Historic Preservation in River Forest p. 8 Survey Process p. 10 Evaluation Methodology p. 13 RIVER FOREST ARCHITECTURE P. 18 Architectural Styles p. 19 Vernacular Building Forms p. 34 HISTORIC CONTEXT P. 40 Nineteenth Century Residential Development p. 40 Twentieth Century Development: 1900 to 1940 p. 44 Twentieth Century Development: 1940 to 2000 p. 51 River Forest Commercial Development p. 52 Religious and Educational Buildings p. 57 Public Schools and Library p. 60 Campuses of Higher Education p. 61 Recreational Buildings and Parks p. 62 Significant Architects and Builders p. 64 Other Architects and Builders of Note p. 72 Buildings by Significant Architect and Builders p. 73 SURVEY FINDINGS P. 78 Significant Properties p. 79 Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 81 Non-Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 81 Potentially Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 81 Potentially Non-Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 81 Noteworthy Buildings Less than 50 Years Old p. 82 Districts p. 82 Recommendations p. 83 INVENTORY P. 94 Significant Properties p. 94 Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 97 Non-Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 103 Potentially Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 104 Potentially Non-Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 121 Notable Buildings Less than 50 Years Old p. 125 BIBLIOGRAPHY P. 128 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS RIVER FOREST HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION David Franek, Chair Laurel McMahon Paul Harding, FAIA Cindy Mastbrook Judy Deogracias David Raino-Ogden Tom Zurowski, AIA PROJECT COMMITTEE Laurel McMahon Tom Zurowski, AIA Michael Braiman, Assistant Village Administrator SURVEY TEAM Nicholas P.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 1992
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. BOX 37127 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20013-7127 IN aEPLy a£F£K TO: The Director of the Natlonal Park service is pleased to Inform you that the fol lowing properties have been entered In the National Register of Historic Places. For further Information cal I 202/343-9542. JAN 3 1992 WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 12/23/91 THROJc:>1 12/27/91 KEY: state. county, ProPerty Name. Address/soundary, City, vicinity, Reference Nuntier N-IL status. Action, Date, MUitipie Name ARIZONA. c.ocoNINO co..NTY. Fjrst Baptist church, 123 s. Beaver St .• Flagstaff. 91001576, IIOMINATION, 12/23/91 ARIZONA, COCONINO COl.NTY. Pendley Homestead Historic District. us 89-A, 7 ml.Nor Sedona. Sedona vicinity, 91001857, NOMINATION, 12/23/91 CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COlNTY, The Bellevue-Staten. 492 Staten Ave .. 0akland. 91001896, NOMINATION. 12/27/91 CALIFORNIA, ORANOE CQU,ITY, Casa Romantica. 415 Avenlda cranada, San Clemente. 91001900. NOMINATION, 12/27/91 COLORADO, MONTEZUMA CQU,ITY, Mancos High school, 350 crand AVe., Mancos. 91001740. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 IDAHO. CARIBCX.J cou,rry_ Largllliere, Edgar waiter sr. HOuse. 30 west second south st .• soda Springs. 91001870. NOMINATION. 12/23/91 INDIANA, MARION oou,rTY. St. Clair. 109 w. ~t. Clair St., Indianapolis, 83000085. REMOVAL. 12/04/91 (Apartments and Flats of oowntown Indianapolis TR) IOWA. ALLAMAKEE cou,rry, Lans jng Fisher les Bui !ding. Between co. HWy. X-52 and the Miss lss lppi R.. south uns ing. Lans Ing, 91001832. NOMINATION, 12/23/91 <conservation Movement in 1owa MPS) IOWA.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
    HYDRODYNAMICS CONSULTANTS, INC. Environmental Engineering, Consulting, and Contracting PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Lake City Cleaners (Formerly Murrie Cleaners) IEPA LPC#0970805039 866 North Western Avenue Lake Forest, Illinois 60045 June 9, 2020 5403 Patton Drive, Suite 215, Lisle, Illinois 60532 Tel. 630-724-0098 Web Site: http://www.HydrodynamicsConsultants.com HYDRODYNAMICS CONSULTANTS, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 PURPOSE .............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES ........................................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 On-site Inspection ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Inspection of Surrounding Properties ......................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Uses of the Subject Property ....................................................................................................... 7 2.2.4 Review of Regulatory Databases ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Red Meat Republic: a Hoof-To-Table History of How Beef Changed America
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Introduction Jonathan Ogden Armour could not abide socialist agi- tators. It was 1906, and Upton Sinclair had just published The Jungle, his explosive novel about the American meatpacking industry. Based on two years of research and six weeks of under- cover reporting, Sinclair’s book was the arresting tale of an immi- grant family’s toil in Chicago’s slaughterhouses.1 Unfortunately for Armour, The Jungle was not his only concern. A year before, muck- raking journalist Charles Edward Russell’s The Greatest Trust in the World attacked a packing industry that comes to the American dining table “three times a day . and extorts its tribute.”2 In response to these attacks, Armour, head of the enormous meatpacking firm Armour & Company, took to the Saturday Evening Post to defend himself and his industry. Where critics saw filth, corruption, and exploitation, Armour saw clean- liness, fairness, and efficiency. If not for “the professional agitators of the country,” the nation would be free to enjoy an abundance of delicious and affordable meat.3 Armour and his critics could agree on this much: they lived in a world unimaginable fifty years before. In 1860, most cattle lived, died, and were consumed within a few hundred miles’ radius. By 1906, an animal could be born in Texas, slaughtered 1 For general queries, contact [email protected] © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • NFS Form 10-900-B Ombno
    NFS Form 10-900-b OMBNo. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) (Expires Jan. 2005) RECEIVED United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form mi REGISTER OF HISTORIC NATIONAL PARK SERVI This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items, _ X New Submission _ _ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Deerpath Hill Estates: an English Garden Development in Lake Forest, Illinois; 1926-1961 B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each). Development of Deerpath Hill Estates, The City Beautiful Movement, 1926-1931 Great Depression and World War II, 1929-1945 Post World War II Housing Boom and the Renewal of Deerpath Hill Estates, 1945-1961 C. Form Prepared by name/title Paul Bergmann street & number 238 East Woodland Road telephone 312 381 7314 day city or town Lake Bluff state Illinois zip code 60044 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Dataset Illustration
    1 Dataset Illustration The images are crawled from Wikimedia. Here we summary the names, index- ing pages and typical images for the 66-class architectural style dataset. Table 1: Summarization of the architectural style dataset. Url stands for the indexing page on Wikimedia. Name Typical images Achaemenid architecture American Foursquare architecture American craftsman style Ancient Egyptian architecture Art Deco architecture Art Nouveau architecture Baroque architecture Bauhaus architecture 1 Name Typical images Beaux-Arts architecture Byzantine architecture Chicago school architecture Colonial architecture Deconstructivism Edwardian architecture Georgian architecture Gothic architecture Greek Revival architecture International style Novelty 2 architecture Name Typical images Palladian architecture Postmodern architecture Queen Anne architecture Romanesque architecture Russian Revival architecture Tudor Revival architecture 2 Task Description 1. 10-class dataset. The ten datasets used in the classification tasks are American craftsman style, Baroque architecture, Chicago school architecture, Colonial architecture, Georgian architecture, Gothic architecture, Greek Revival architecture, Queen Anne architecture, Romanesque architecture and Russian Revival architecture. These styles have lower intra-class vari- ance and the images are mainly captured in frontal view. 2. 25-class dataset. Except for the ten datasets listed above, the other fifteen styles are Achaemenid architecture, American Foursquare architecture, Ancient Egyptian architecture,
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form 1
    NFS Form 10-900 (3-82) OMB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NFS use only National Register of Historic Places received MAY 6 19ST Inventory—Nomination Form date entered JUN | 5 [937 See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name historic N/A Number of contributing features: 20 Portland Thirteenth Avenue and or common Historic District Number of non-contributing features: 0 2. Location A six-block-long corridor of warehouse properties fronting on NW 13th street & number Avenue, between NW Davis Street on the south and Jl/Anot for publication NW Johnson Street on the north city, town Portland ___ J/Avicinity of Third Congressional District state Oregon code 41 county Multnomah code 051 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use JC_ district public _X _ occupied agriculture museum building(s) _ X_ private unoccupied _X — commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object N/A in process yes: restricted _ government scientific X industrial N/A being considered -X _ "noyes: unrestricted transportation military name Multiple (see Continuation Sheets) street & number N/A city, town N/A vicinity of state 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Multnomah County Courthouse street & number 1021 SW 4th Avenue city, town Portland state Oregon 97204 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Portland Historic title Rpsnurr.p Inventory has this property been determined eligible? yes X no date federal state county _X_ local depository for survey records Portland Bureau nf P1anning 3 11?n SU 5th Avenue city, town Portland state Oregon Q7?n4 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Club Park.Indd
    Country Club Park HPOZ Preservation Plan City of Los Angeles Adopted October 20, 2010 Preservation Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1: 5 Mission Statement Chapter 2: 7 Goals & Objectives Chapter 3: 9 Function of the Plan Chapter 4: 17 Context Statment Chapter 5: 31 Historic Resources Survey Chapter 6: 33 Architectural Styles Chapter 7 63 Residential Rehabilitation Chapter 8: 79 Residential Additions Chapter 9: 83 Residential In-fi ll Chapter 10: 93 Public Realm Chapter 11: 97 Defi nitions Appendices 3 4 Preservation Plan Chapter 1 Mission Statement he principal purpose of the Preservation Plan is to maintain, Tenhance and preserve the historic integrity, sense of place and aesthetic appearance of the three HPOZs and to preserve for future generations their historic architectural character and integrity. The HPOZs and Preservation Plan shall accomplish these by: Providing clear preservation guidelines for restoration and • rehabilitation of structures; Preventing commercial encroachment and preserving the • residential character of the neighborhoods; Preventing teardowns and demolition of contributing • structures; Ensuring that the height, bulk, massing, lot coverage and • architectural designs of both additions and infi ll development are compatible with the historic fabric of the neighborhoods; Providing residents pertinent information about historic • preservation philosophy, resources and opportunities; Encouraging residents to participate in the preservation • process; Fostering neighborhood pride among residents and property • owners;
    [Show full text]
  • Grassroots Event Focuses on Black, Brown Trans
    Photo by Tim Peacock VOL 35, NO. 21 JULY 8, 2020 www.WindyCityMediaGroup.com E. PATRICK JOHNSON A profile of the newest NU dean. Photo from Johnson's website, run with permission 10 DAVID ZAK Leaves Pride Films and Plays amid controversy. Photo by Bob Eddy MARCH 13 POLITICAL PARTY FORWARD Durbin, Baldwin meet with Grassroots event focuses supporters. Official photo of U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin on Black, Brown trans lives 5 PAGE 4 @windycitytimes /windycitymediagroup @windycitytimes www.windycitymediagroup.com July 8, 2020 WINDY CITY TIMES PAGE 6 Chicago Pride Parade 2019. Photo by Kat Fitzgerald (www.MysticImagesPhotography.com) "Kickoff," The Chicago Gay Pride Parade 1976. Diane Alexander White Photography TWO SIDES OF PAGE 20 YESTERDAY APRIL 29, 2020 VOL 35, NO. 20 Looking back at Pride memories of the past (above) WINDYJUNE 24, 2020 and this month’s Drag March for Change (below) PRIDEChicagoBuffalo Pridedrives Grove postponed; on Pride VOL 35, NO. 16 CITY www.WindyCityMediaGroup.com AND TODAY EDDIE TIMES HUNSPERGER PAGE 17 Activist and partner of Rick Garcia dies. Photo of Hunsperger (right) and Garcia courtesy of Garcia 4 Buffalo Grove Pride 2019. SEEING Tim Carroll Photography THE LIGHT Lighthouse Foundation prepares programming. Photo of Rev. Jamie Frazier by Marcel Brunious 8 PAGE 4 www.windycitymediagroup.com From the Drag March for Change. Photo by Vernon Hester @windycitytimes /windycitymediagroup @windycitytimes www.windycitymediagroup.com @windycitytimes FUN AND GUNN Tim Gunn on his new show, /windycitymediagroup 'Making the Cut'. Photo by Scott McDermott 13 @windycitytimes SUPPORT Photo by Tim Peacock 2 VOL 35, NO. 21 JULY 8, 2020 www.WindyCityMediaGroup.com E.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
    City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin Architectural and Historical Intensive Survey Report of Residential Properties Phase 2 By Rowan Davidson, Associate AIA & Jennifer L. Lehrke, AIA, NCARB Legacy Architecture, Inc. 605 Erie Avenue, Suite 101 Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081 Project Director Joseph R. DeRose, Survey & Registration Historian Wisconsin Historical Society Division of Historic Preservation – Public History 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Sponsoring Agency Wisconsin Historical Society Division of Historic Preservation – Public History 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 2019-2020 Acknowledgments This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to Office of the Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240. The activity that is the subject of this intensive survey report has been financed entirely with Federal Funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and administered by the Wisconsin Historical Society. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago No 16
    CLASSICIST chicago No 16 CLASSICIST NO 16 chicago Institute of Classical Architecture & Art 20 West 44th Street, Suite 310, New York, NY 10036 4 Telephone: (212) 730-9646 Facsimile: (212) 730-9649 Foreword www.classicist.org THOMAS H. BEEBY 6 Russell Windham, Chairman Letter from the Editors Peter Lyden, President STUART COHEN AND JULIE HACKER Classicist Committee of the ICAA Board of Directors: Anne Kriken Mann and Gary Brewer, Co-Chairs; ESSAYS Michael Mesko, David Rau, David Rinehart, William Rutledge, Suzanne Santry 8 Charles Atwood, Daniel Burnham, and the Chicago World’s Fair Guest Editors: Stuart Cohen and Julie Hacker ANN LORENZ VAN ZANTEN Managing Editor: Stephanie Salomon 16 Design: Suzanne Ketchoyian The “Beaux-Arts Boys” of Chicago: An Architectural Genealogy, 1890–1930 J E A N N E SY LV EST ER ©2019 Institute of Classical Architecture & Art 26 All rights reserved. Teaching Classicism in Chicago, 1890–1930 ISBN: 978-1-7330309-0-8 ROLF ACHILLES ISSN: 1077-2922 34 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Frank Lloyd Wright and Beaux-Arts Design The ICAA, the Classicist Committee, and the Guest Editors would like to thank James Caulfield for his extraordinary and exceedingly DAVID VAN ZANTEN generous contribution to Classicist No. 16, including photography for the front and back covers and numerous photographs located throughout 43 this issue. We are grateful to all the essay writers, and thank in particular David Van Zanten. Mr. Van Zanten both contributed his own essay Frank Lloyd Wright and the Classical Plan and made available a manuscript on Charles Atwood on which his late wife was working at the time of her death, allowing it to be excerpted STUART COHEN and edited for this issue of the Classicist.
    [Show full text]