DOCSLIB.ORG

Armour & Company's Stock Depot

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NOMINATION OF HISTORIC BUILDING, STRUCTURE, SITE, OR OBJECT PHILADELPHIA REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION SUBMIT ALL ATTACHED MATERIALS ON PAPER AND IN ELECTRONIC FORM ON CD (MS WORD FORMAT) 1. ADDRESS OF HISTORIC RESOURCE (must comply with an Office of Property Assessment address) Street address: 909-31 Noble Street Postal code: 19123 Councilmanic District: 1 2. NAME OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Historic Name: Armour & Company’s Stock Depot Other Name: Armour & Co. 3. TYPE OF HISTORIC RESOURCE X Building Structure Site Object 4. PROPERTY INFORMATION Condition: excellent good fair poor ruins Occupancy: occupied vacant under construction unknown Current use: Warehouse 5. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Please attach a plot plan and written description of the boundary. SEE ATTACHED SHEET. 6. DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHED SHEET. Please attach a description of the historic resource and supplement with current photographs. 7. SIGNIFICANCE Please attach the Statement of Significance. [See Attached Sheet] Period of Significance (from year to year): from 1906-1969 Date(s) of construction and/or alteration: c. 1906 Architect, engineer, and/or designer: Robert C. Clark Builder, contractor, and/or artisan: Unknown Original owner: J. Ogden Armour Other significant persons: NA CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION: The historic resource satisfies the following criteria for designation (check all that apply): X (a) Has significant character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City, Commonwealth or Nation or is associated with the life of a person significant in the past; or, (b) Is associated with an event of importance to the history of the City, Commonwealth or Nation; or X (c) Reflects the environment in an era characterized by a distinctive architectural style; or, X (d) Embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or engineering specimen; or, (e) Is the work of a designer, architect, landscape architect or designer, or engineer whose work has significantly influenced the historical, architectural, economic, social, or cultural development of the City, Commonwealth or Nation; or, (f) Contains elements of design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a significant innovation; or, (g) Is part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area which should be preserved according to an historic, cultural or architectural motif; or, (h) Owing to its unique location or singular physical characteristic, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community or City; or, (i) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in pre-history or history; or X (j) Exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social or historical heritage of the community. 8. MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Please attach a bibliography. SEE ATTACHED SHEET. 9. NOMINATOR Name with Title Oscar Beisert, Author Email [email protected] Organization Keeping Society of Philadelphia, LLC Date 11 July 2017 Street Address 1315 Walnut Street, Suite 320 Telephone (717) 602-5002 City, State, and Postal Code: Philadelphia, PA 19107 Nominators are not the property owners. PHC USE ONLY Date of Receipt: July 11, 2017 Correct-Complete Incorrect-Incomplete Date: September 18, 2017 Date of Notice Issuance: September 18, 2017 Property Owner at Time of Notice Name: NCL Realty LP Address: 401 N. 10th Street City: Philadelphia State: PA Postal Code: 19123 Date(s) Reviewed by the Committee on Historic Designation:____________________________________ Date(s) Reviewed by the Historical Commission:______________________________________________ Date of Final Action:____________________________________________________________________ Designated Rejected 4/11/13 Nomination for the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places Looking northwest. Source: Oscar Beisert. Armour & Company’s Philadelphia Stock Depot 909-31 Noble Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Armour & Company’s Philadelphia Stock Depot, 909-31 Noble Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Nomination to the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places, 2017–Page 1 5. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION The boundary for the subject designation is delineated in red. Please note that only the yellow portion of the space within the delineation is subject to the standards of the proposed designation. The areas in pink and white may be subject to design review, but shall not be subject to any additional restrictions. Source: Philadelphia Water. BEGINNING at a point on the Northerly side of Noble Street at the distance of 40 feet 4-1/8 inches Eastwardly from the Easterly side of 10th Street thence extending Northwardly parallel with Percy Street the distance of 100 feet to a point; thence extending Eastwardly parallel with Noble Street, the distance of 54 feet to a point on the Westerly side of a former alley 5 feet wide, thence extending Northwardly along the said Westerly side of the former alley, parallel with Percy Street, the distance of 59 feet 3-5/8 inches to a point on the Southerly side of Hamilton Street, thence extending Eastwardly along the Southerly side of Hamilton Street and crossing the Northerly end of the said former alley, the distance of 132 feet 2 inches to a point, thence extending Southwardly partly passing through the center of a party wall of the building erected on this lot and the building erected on the lot adjoining to the East 89 feet 2-3/8 inches to a point, thence extending Eastwardly partly passing through the center of a party wall of the building erected on this lot and the building erected on the lot adjoining to the North 20 feet 4 inches to a point, thence extending Southwardly partly passing through the center of a party wall of the building erected on this lot and the building erected on the lot adjoining to the East 69 feet 10 inches to a point on the Northerly side of Noble Street, thence Westwardly along the said Northerly side of Noble Street the distance of 206 feet 5-7/8 inches to the first mentioned point and place of beginning. Armour & Company’s Philadelphia Stock Depot, 909-31 Noble Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Nomination to the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places, 2017–Page 2 6. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION Conceived in 1900 and eventually realized in 1906, Armour & Company’s Stock Depot at 909-31 Noble Street is a rectangular-shaped four-story building of reinforced concrete and masonry construction designed in the Italian Renaissance Revival style showing influences of the Chicago School, or Commercial style. The building is finely constructed of warm yellow Roman brick in a well-balanced composition at the primary elevation. South Elevation South elevation. Courtesy Oscar Beisert. With a row of five loading bays anchored by arched openings, the primary elevation on Noble Street features classically inspired architectural details and rigorous symmetry. Its width being slightly greater than its height, the masonry façade is divided into three vertical bays. The center bay features three levels of seven rectangular window openings above three ground level loading docks. These three openings each contain a metal, overhead door and are divided by two cast iron columns; an entry door with cast stone surround is to the west of the three center docks. At ground level, the two outer bays each contain a loading bay with metal, overhead doors, both taller than the center bay openings and each is capped by an arch with an articulated keystone; at the two levels above each arch are double rectangular windows. The brick elevation is wrapped horizontally at three points: an entablature at the brick cornice line with corbeling in lightly profiled dentils; at the center point by a cast stone belt course with dentils that meets the top of the keystones; and at the point of alignment of the sills of the center bay windows and the spring-points of the outer bay arches. Above the center belt course, the three bays are divided by brick pilasters. Two downspouts are located at each pilaster, falling from scuppers in the cornice corbeling that indicates that the brick entablature is a parapet for a flat roof beyond. All openings above ground level except for the two arches have hidden lintels, slender sills, and are currently infilled with scored plywood. Armour & Company’s Philadelphia Stock Depot, 909-31 Noble Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Nomination to the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places, 2017–Page 3 At the central loading bay, there is a sign above the openings that reads “Center City Grocery & Produce.” At the inner corners of the opening, on either side, are two rounded granite plinths that may serve as decorative bumpers for any vehicular traffic. Extending out from the building at the east arch are train tracks; they appear briefly above the concrete paving but are delineated by two parallel, curving cracks in the pavement that extend to the complex across Noble Street. The two cast iron columns are painted gray and feature stylized capitals and plinths in a Rational style that stand in contrast to the classicism of the remainder of the façade. South elevation details. Courtesy Oscar Beisert Armour & Company’s Philadelphia Stock Depot, 909-31 Noble Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Nomination to the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places, 2017–Page 4 West Elevation The west elevation of the building consists of exposed red brick with a roofline form that expresses a long span truss system at the interior of the building. There are only a few window openings at this elevation, in addition to the ghosts of painted signs and adjacent structures. A painted sign for Lipoff’s Center City Grocery Co. remains. Adjacent to the east elevation is a parking lot surrounded by a tall, chain link fence. A gantry appears beyond a thatch of vegetation at the northwest corner of the site indicating the direct proximity of the elevated Reading Viaduct. West elevation. Source: Cyclomedia, 2017. North Elevation The north elevation of the building meets the public right of way at Hamilton Street and features yellow brick with the same corbeled cornice entablature as at the primary elevation.
Recommended publications
  • Red Meat Republic: a Hoof-To-Table History of How Beef Changed America

    Red Meat Republic: a Hoof-To-Table History of How Beef Changed America

    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Introduction Jonathan Ogden Armour could not abide socialist agi- tators. It was 1906, and Upton Sinclair had just published The Jungle, his explosive novel about the American meatpacking industry. Based on two years of research and six weeks of under- cover reporting, Sinclair’s book was the arresting tale of an immi- grant family’s toil in Chicago’s slaughterhouses.1 Unfortunately for Armour, The Jungle was not his only concern. A year before, muck- raking journalist Charles Edward Russell’s The Greatest Trust in the World attacked a packing industry that comes to the American dining table “three times a day . and extorts its tribute.”2 In response to these attacks, Armour, head of the enormous meatpacking firm Armour & Company, took to the Saturday Evening Post to defend himself and his industry. Where critics saw filth, corruption, and exploitation, Armour saw clean- liness, fairness, and efficiency. If not for “the professional agitators of the country,” the nation would be free to enjoy an abundance of delicious and affordable meat.3 Armour and his critics could agree on this much: they lived in a world unimaginable fifty years before. In 1860, most cattle lived, died, and were consumed within a few hundred miles’ radius. By 1906, an animal could be born in Texas, slaughtered 1 For general queries, contact [email protected] © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher.
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form 1

    National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form 1

    NFS Form 10-900 (3-82) OMB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NFS use only National Register of Historic Places received MAY 6 19ST Inventory—Nomination Form date entered JUN | 5 [937 See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name historic N/A Number of contributing features: 20 Portland Thirteenth Avenue and or common Historic District Number of non-contributing features: 0 2. Location A six-block-long corridor of warehouse properties fronting on NW 13th street & number Avenue, between NW Davis Street on the south and Jl/Anot for publication NW Johnson Street on the north city, town Portland ___ J/Avicinity of Third Congressional District state Oregon code 41 county Multnomah code 051 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use JC_ district public _X _ occupied agriculture museum building(s) _ X_ private unoccupied _X — commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object N/A in process yes: restricted _ government scientific X industrial N/A being considered -X _ "noyes: unrestricted transportation military name Multiple (see Continuation Sheets) street & number N/A city, town N/A vicinity of state 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Multnomah County Courthouse street & number 1021 SW 4th Avenue city, town Portland state Oregon 97204 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Portland Historic title Rpsnurr.p Inventory has this property been determined eligible? yes X no date federal state county _X_ local depository for survey records Portland Bureau nf P1anning 3 11?n SU 5th Avenue city, town Portland state Oregon Q7?n4 7.
  • Green2015-An-Action-Plan-For-The

    Green2015-An-Action-Plan-For-The

    Green2015 Advisory Group Conveners and Participating Organizations Michael DiBerardinis, Department of Parks and Recreation Commissioner, co-convener Alan Greenberger, Deputy Mayor for Economic Development, co-convener Amtrak Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future Delaware River Waterfront Corporation Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Fairmount Park Conservancy Fairmount Park Historic Preservation Trust Friends of the Wissahickon Greenspace Alliance Natural Land Trust Neighborhood Gardens Association Next Great City Coalition Office of City Councilman Darrell Clarke Office of Councilwoman Anna Verna Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Environmental Council Pennsylvania Horticultural Society Philadelphia Association of Community Development Corporations Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia Department of Commerce Philadelphia Department of Licenses and Inspections Philadelphia Department of Public Health Philadelphia Department of Public Property Philadelphia Department of Revenue Philadelphia Housing Authority Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation Philadelphia Office of Housing and Community Development Philadelphia Office of Sustainability Philadelphia Office of Transportation and Utilities Philadelphia Orchard Project Philadelphia Parks Alliance Philadelphia Parks and Recreation Commission Philadelphia Water Department Redevelopment Authority of Philadelphia School District of Philadelphia Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
  • Building Bridges: Finding New Uses for an Old Viaduct

    Building Bridges: Finding New Uses for an Old Viaduct

    Building Bridges Page 1 of 2 send to printer July 22-28, 2004 CITYSPACE Building Bridges Finding new uses for an old viaduct. by W. Kyle Gradinger In the world's most progressive cities, it's fashionable to take the high road. To that end, planners in New York City and Paris are turning abandoned viaducts which once carried railroads above the busy streets below into beautiful downtown TIES TO THE PAST: Students from oases. Part of an abandoned viaduct's appeal is that it provides a large, available Penn and Drexel have gotten tract of land in a city center. As urban living gains in popularity, cities need to create together with Callowhill residents public spaces that are geared for 21st-century lifestyles. to make plans for the Reading Viaduct. Photo By: Michael T. Regan Philadelphia also has a long-forgotten viaduct at Reading Terminal, one that's prime for a new park, affordable housing or even office space. Meanwhile, Paris and New York have already leveraged aging industrial infrastructure to create vibrant new neighborhoods. The Promenade Plantee in Paris is a former railroad viaduct turned city park running several kilometers from the Bastille to the Bois de Vincennes Park on the city's eastern edge. The structure is supported by beautiful brick arches and is now occupied by chic retail stores. Atop the viaduct, a beautiful garden has replaced rusty rails and provided the nearby arrondisements (districts) with a unique and enjoyable public open space offering expansive vistas in the heart of Paris. Since the construction of the Plantee in the early 1990s, the surrounding neighborhood has seen the construction of more than 1,040 new residences, 75,000 square feet of commercial space and 200,000 square feet of office space.
  • State of Center City Philadelphia 2021

    State of Center City Philadelphia 2021

    STATE OF CENTER CITY PHILADELPHIA 2021 Restoring | Returning | Reanimating Contents Introduction 1 Office 12 Health Care & Higher Education 18 Conventions, Tourism & Hotels 23 Arts & Culture 27 Retail 30 Employment 37 Transportation & Access 47 Downtown Living 53 Developments 62 Acknowledgements 64 Center City District & Central Philadelphia Development Corporation CENTERCITYPHILA.ORG Chapter Name| 1 Reanimating the City District | Center Center of the City Park Dilworth The global pandemic, local stay-at-home mandates and civil boarded-up storefronts and installed new artwork on many. We unrest created extraordinary challenges for all cities. In Center commissioned 200 decorative banners created by Philadelphia City, pedestrian volumes initially plummeted by 72%, as office artists. Our landscape teams planted street trees, filled park workers, hotel guests, regional shoppers, students, theater and flowerbeds with tens of thousands of bulbs and upgraded street restaurant patrons disappeared. At night, streets were devoid of lighting. We continued to provide fee-for-service cleaning for five cars, sidewalks were empty. From the very start in March 2020, adjacent residential neighborhoods. we had all of our on-street and park employees designated To enhance safety, we deployed new bike patrols and security “essential workers.” The central lesson from the Center City vans in afternoons and seven evenings per week, supplement- District’s founding 30 years ago suddenly had renewed reso- ing the role of our Community Service Representatives (CSRs). nance: the revival of economic activity and vitality depends upon In 2020, CSRs had more than 177,000 sustained conversations confidence in a public environment that is clean, safe with pedestrians seeking directions, responding to inquiries and attractive.
  • The Recommended FY2015-2020 Capital Program

    The Recommended FY2015-2020 Capital Program

    The Recommended FY2015 -2020 Capital Program City of Philadelphia Philadelphia becomes one of the safest cities in America • The education and health of Philadelphians improve Philadelphia is a place of choice • Philadelphia becomes the greenest and most sustainable city in America Philadelphia government works efficiently and effectively, with integrity and responsiveness City of Philadelphia: The Recommended FY2015-2020 Capital Program City of Philadelphia Michael A. Nutter, Mayor Alan Greenberger, Deputy Mayor for Economic Development Philadelphia City Planning Commission Alan Greenberger, FAIA, Chairman Joseph Syrnick, Vice Chairman Rob Dubow Patrick Eiding Bernard Lee, Esq. Elizabeth K. Miller Richard Negrin Nilda Iris Ruiz, MBA Nancy Rogo Trainer, AIA, AICP Gary J. Jastrzab, Executive Director Thanks go to our colleagues… Alan S. Urek, AICP, Deputy Executive Director Jeannette Brugger, AICP, PP Office of Budget and Program Evaluation John Haak, AICP Rebecca Rhynhart, Budget Director Jametta Johnson Nicole McCormac, Deputy Budget Director, Capital Clint Randall Randy Milbourne Anthony M. Santaniello Meredith Quick Deborah Schaaf Thomas Tartack Mark Wheeler, GISP Tavare Brown Department of Public Property, Capital One Parkway Building Projects Division th 1515 Arch Street, 13 Floor Philadelphia, PA 19102 215.683.4615 www.phila.gov/cityplanning www.phila2035.org February 28, 2014 City of Philadelphia: The Recommended FY2015-2020 Capital Program Table of Contents Highlights of the Recommended FY2015-2020 Capital Program 1 Sources of
  • Request for Proposals for a Feasibility Analysis Study

    Request for Proposals for a Feasibility Analysis Study

    CENTER CITY GREENWAY CONNECTIONS Request for Proposals For a Feasibility Analysis Study Release Date: August 10, 2007 Submission Date: September 28, 2007 Center City Greenway Connections RFP TABLE OF CONTENTS: I. GENERAL INFORMATION.............................................................................................................1 Proposal Requirements and RFP Conditions ...........................................................................................1 II. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................3 III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION...............................................................................................5 History – East Coast Greenway..................................................................................................................5 Existing and Upcoming Segments of the Greenway in Philadelphia....................................................6 List of Potential Alignments........................................................................................................................9 IV. PROJECT GOALS ...........................................................................................................................15 V. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES.....................................................................16 VI. PROJECT MANAGEMENT, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND SELECTION PROCESS.........................................................................................................................................................19
  • Chicago Landmarks, Whose Nine Members Are Appointed by the Mayor, Was Established in 1968 by City Ordinance

    Chicago Landmarks, Whose Nine Members Are Appointed by the Mayor, Was Established in 1968 by City Ordinance

    LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT Main Building and Machinery Hall, Illinois Institute of Technology 3300-20 S. FEDERAL ST. & 100 W. 33RD ST. Preliminary Landmark recommendation approved by the Commssion on Chicago Landmrks, January 2004 CITY OF CHICAGO Richard M. Daley, Mayor Department of Planning and Development Denise M. Casalino, P.E., Commissioner Machinery Hall Main Building The Main Building and Machinery Hall of the Illinois Institute of Technology flank W. 33rd St., next to a railroad embankment and nearby Dan Ryan Expressway, in the South-Side Douglas neighborhood. The Commission on Chicago Landmarks, whose nine members are appointed by the Mayor, was established in 1968 by city ordinance. The Commission is responsible for recommending to the City Council which individual buildings, sites, objects, or districts should be designated as Chicago Land- marks, which protects them by law. The landmark designation process begins with a staff study and a preliminary summary of information related to the potential designation criteria. The next step is a preliminary vote by the landmarks commission as to whether the proposed landmark is worthy of consideration. This vote not only initiates the formal designation process, but it places the review of city permits for the property under the jurisdiction of the Commission until a final landmark recommendation is acted on by the City Council. This Landmark Designation Report is subject to possible revision and amendment during the designation process. Only language contained within the designation ordinance adopted by the City Council should be regarded as final. MAIN BUILDING AND MACHINERY HALL, ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (ORIGINALLY ARMOUR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY) MAIN BUILDING 3300-20 S.
  • Village of Lake Bluff Historic Preservation Commission Meeting

    Village of Lake Bluff Historic Preservation Commission Meeting

    VILLAGE OF LAKE BLUFF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 11, 2020 - 7:00 P.M. VILLAGE HALL BOARD ROOM 40 E. CENTER AVENUE, LAKE BLUFF, ILLINOIS AGENDA 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Consideration of December 11, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes 3. Consideration of January 27, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes (Stonebridge Site Tour) 4. Consideration of January 30, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes (Stonebridge Advisory Review) 5. Non-Agenda Items and Visitors The Chairperson and Members of the HPC allocate fifteen (15) minutes at this time for those individuals who would like the opportunity to address the HPC on any matter within its area of responsibility that is not listed on the agenda. Each person addressing the HPC is asked to limit their comments to a maximum of three (3) minutes. 6. Presentation of Village Historic Survey 7. Staff Report a.) April Meeting Date & Stonebridge Advisory Review 8. Adjournment The Village of Lake Bluff is subject to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Individuals with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who require certain accommodations in order to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting, or who have questions regarding the accessibility of the meeting or the facilities, are requested to contact Glen Cole at 847-234-0774 or TDD number 234-2153 promptly to allow the Village of Lake Bluff to make reasonable accommodations. VILLAGE OF LAKE BLUFF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING December 11, 2019 7:00 P.M. Village Hall Board Room 40 East Center Avenue DRAFT MINUTES 1.
  • Writing the Viaduct at the Heart of Her Life and Art

    Writing the Viaduct at the Heart of Her Life and Art

    The Viaduct At The Heart Of Her Life And Art By Nathaniel Popkin Published: October 29, 2013 Sarah McEneaney, Trestletown North From Goldtex (2013) Amidst the precise geometry of the the streets and buildings in Sarah McEneaney’s painting Trestletown, North From Goldtex (2013), the Reading Viaduct stretches out like a limber dog, its thick fox-like tail hugging the industrial landscape. Sarah herself is there, standing on the SEPTA spur (the dog’s neck), as she often is, with John Struble, with whom she founded the Reading Viaduct Project in 2003, and her 12 year old dog Trixie. In the painting, McEneaney and Struble are studying design plans for the spur, which starting next year will become a park, the first hint that McEneaney and Struble’s dream to transform the train trestle, out of service since 1984, will become reality. The painting is one of 14 that comprise “Trestletown,” McEneaney’s second solo show at Locks Gallery on Washington Square, an homage to the Viaduct and its place in the domestic landscape of the painter’s life. On Friday, Locks will host an opening reception for the show, which runs until 600 Washington Square South Philadelphia PA 19106 tel 215.629.1000 fax 215.629.3868 [email protected] www.locksgallery.com Sarah McEneaney, Twighlight (2012) November 23, and a panel discussion on the Viaduct, “Rethinking Trestletown,” November 21 at 6PM. The show comes directly on the heels of the merger of the Reading Viaduct Project and Friends of the Rail Park (the joint organization will be called, going forward, Friends of the Rail Park, though it will retain the decade-long history of RVP), and together, the show and merger allow us to recognize McEneaney for her vision and leadership: without her, there would be no hope of transforming the Viaduct into an imaginative public space.
  • State Transportation Commission 2015 Twelve Year Program Development Regional Results of the Survey and Public Feedback From

    State Transportation Commission 2015 Twelve Year Program Development Regional Results of the Survey and Public Feedback From

    State Transportation Commission 2015 Twelve Year Program Development Regional results of the survey and public feedback from August thru November 2013 Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) Version 01-2014 Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission MPO Total Visitors 730 Mobility Concerns Traffic congestion is growing and resources are limited to build additional capacity. As a result, transportation agencies are exploring ways to manage demand, operate efficiently, and improve capacity. Using a scale of 1-5, for each mobility concern, please rank how important each mobility concern is to you, with one being ‘Not Important’ and 5 being ‘Very Important’. Passenger Ridership on the Keystone Corridor has doubled since 2000 making it !mtrak’s fourth-busiest route in the Rail nation. Rail infrastructure improvements are critical to timely service. Responded With an Average Rank of 4.35 Congestion Relieve traffic congestion by addressing bottlenecks and other traffic relief measures. Responded With an Average Rank of 4.26 Transit Implementing new technologies improves service. Responded With an Average Rank of 4.15 Signals Modernization of traffic signals streamlines traffic flow and reduces fuel costs for motorists. Responded With an Average Rank of 4.07 Incident This legislation would allow for the safe, quick clearance of traffic incidents from the roadway. Responded With an Average Rank of 3.59 Freight Rail $500 billion in goods and services travel through PA each year. That investment would grow with upgrades to accommodate intermodal changes such as emerging needs from the natural gas industry and double- stack train access to our ports. Responded With an Average Rank of 3.53 Real T ime This involves the use of dynamic message signs, PennDOT’s 511P!.com system and social media.
  • Reimagined Spring Garden Street Greenway

    Reimagined Spring Garden Street Greenway

    THE rEIMAGINED June 2013 SUPPORT THE SPRING GARDEN STREET GREENWAY PROJECT LIKE US ON FACEBOOK Stay informed about promotional events and project updates at www.facebook.com/SpringGardenStreetGreenway SEND A LETTER OF SUPPORT Write to Deputy Mayor Rina Cutler announcing your organization’s official endorsement of the project ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING Sign up at www.SpringGardenStreetGreenway.com to receive email updates on upcoming events MAP YOUR THOUGHTS Go to www.SpringGardenStreetGreenway.com to Map Your Thoughts to share place-specific insights GIVE US A CALL! Want to contact us directly to offer support for the project? Or just to voice your opinion? Contact Jeffrey Knowles at [email protected] or (215) 545 - 4570 The Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) is one of the A Proud state’s leading environmental organizations and has been Member protecting and restoring natural and built environments of: ABOUTthrough US: innovation, collaboration, education, and advocacyA PROUD for over 40 years. One of PEC’s major initiatives has beenPARTNER OF : The Pennsylvaniadeveloping Environmental greenway corridors Council throughout is one ofthe the Greater state’s leadingPhiladelphia environmental area. The organizations Spring Garden and Street has been Greenway is protecting andone restoringof the latest natural projects and which built PEC environments has been engaged through innovation,in to add collaboration, to Pennsylvania’s education green infrastructure. and advocacy for over 40 years. One of PEC’s major initiatives has been developing greenwayThis project corridorswas financed throughout in part by athe grant Greater from the PhiladelphiaCommunity area. The SpringConservation Garden Partnerships Street Greenway Program, is Environmental the one of the latestStewardship projects Fund, which under PEC the has administration been engaged of the in Pennsylvania to add to Pennsylvania’sDepartment ofgreen Conservation infrastructure.