DOCSLIB.ORG

Architectural Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Architectural Guidelines Architectural Guidelines December 15, 2020 Table of Contents Contact Information ...................................................................................................................................... 1 General Information ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Responsibilities ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Components .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Residential ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Residential Mixed-Use .............................................................................................................................. 2 Commercial/Mixed Employment .............................................................................................................. 2 Multiple Family ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee ............................................................................................ 2 Committee Membership ........................................................................................................................... 2 Preliminary and Final Review .................................................................................................................... 2 Preliminary Review ................................................................................................................................... 3 Final Review .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Appeals ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Earth Advantage®...................................................................................................................................... 4 Enforcement ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Performance Bonds................................................................................................................................... 4 Non-Conforming Improvements ............................................................................................................... 4 Non-Waiver ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Severability ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Submittal Requirements ............................................................................................................................... 6 Preliminary Review ................................................................................................................................... 6 Final Review .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Design Review Fee and Refundable Deposit ............................................................................................ 6 Final Inspection and Refund ..................................................................................................................... 7 General Development Guidelines ................................................................................................................. 8 Adjacent Property ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Animals ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Awnings ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Burning, BBQs and Fire Pits ....................................................................................................................... 8 Chimneys, Shrouds and Fireplace Vents ................................................................................................... 8 Concrete Washouts ................................................................................................................................... 8 Drainage .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Driveways .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Excavation and Grading ............................................................................................................................ 9 Exterior Colors and Stains ......................................................................................................................... 9 Exterior Design Treatment ........................................................................................................................ 9 Fines .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Fire Safety ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Flagpoles ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Garbage and Trash Removal During Construction .................................................................................. 10 Gutters and Downspouts ........................................................................................................................ 10 Heating and Cooling Systems .................................................................................................................. 10 Mailboxes ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Maintenance ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Metals and Plastics ................................................................................................................................. 10 Sanitary Facility ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Satellite Dishes and Antennas ................................................................................................................. 10 Service Yards and Trash Enclosures ........................................................................................................ 11 Setbacks .................................................................................................................................................. 11 Skylights and Solar Devices ..................................................................................................................... 11 Smoking ................................................................................................................................................... 11 Tarps........................................................................................................................................................ 11 Tree Preservation Guidelines .................................................................................................................. 11 Tree Removal and Trimming ................................................................................................................... 11 Temporary Structures ............................................................................................................................. 12 Utilities Services and Meters .................................................................................................................. 12 Venting .................................................................................................................................................... 12 Violations ................................................................................................................................................ 12 Water Features ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Residential Architectural Guidelines Prototypes R-1, R-2, R-3 ................................................................... 13 Ancillary (Detached) Outbuildings .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES HISTORICAL and ARCHITECTURAL SITES COMMISSION Preservation Design Guidelines for Decatur Historic Districts and Landmarks
    CITY OF DECATUR Historical and Architectural Sites Commission PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL SITES COMMISSION Preservation Design Guidelines for Decatur Historic Districts and Landmarks Prepared by City of Decatur Neighborhood Services Department One Gary K. Anderson Plaza Decatur, Illinois 62523-1196 Phone 217.424.2793 Published by Historical and Architectural Sites Commission 2008 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION Applying for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) ......................................................... 2 Approval Process ................................................................................................................. 3 How to use the Historic District Program Manual and Guidelines ...................................... 4 The Secretary of the Interior ................................................................................................ 5 Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation .................................................... 5 CHAPTER 2 - NEIGHBORHOODS & ARCHITECTURE Residential Structures ........................................................................................................... 7 Architectural Styles of Decatur’s Residences ...................................................................... 8 Non-Contributing Structures .............................................................................................. 10 CHAPTER 3 - NEIGHBORHOOD SETTING Trees and Landscaping ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Dataset Illustration
    1 Dataset Illustration The images are crawled from Wikimedia. Here we summary the names, index- ing pages and typical images for the 66-class architectural style dataset. Table 1: Summarization of the architectural style dataset. Url stands for the indexing page on Wikimedia. Name Typical images Achaemenid architecture American Foursquare architecture American craftsman style Ancient Egyptian architecture Art Deco architecture Art Nouveau architecture Baroque architecture Bauhaus architecture 1 Name Typical images Beaux-Arts architecture Byzantine architecture Chicago school architecture Colonial architecture Deconstructivism Edwardian architecture Georgian architecture Gothic architecture Greek Revival architecture International style Novelty 2 architecture Name Typical images Palladian architecture Postmodern architecture Queen Anne architecture Romanesque architecture Russian Revival architecture Tudor Revival architecture 2 Task Description 1. 10-class dataset. The ten datasets used in the classification tasks are American craftsman style, Baroque architecture, Chicago school architecture, Colonial architecture, Georgian architecture, Gothic architecture, Greek Revival architecture, Queen Anne architecture, Romanesque architecture and Russian Revival architecture. These styles have lower intra-class vari- ance and the images are mainly captured in frontal view. 2. 25-class dataset. Except for the ten datasets listed above, the other fifteen styles are Achaemenid architecture, American Foursquare architecture, Ancient Egyptian architecture,
    [Show full text]
  • Country Club Park.Indd
    Country Club Park HPOZ Preservation Plan City of Los Angeles Adopted October 20, 2010 Preservation Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1: 5 Mission Statement Chapter 2: 7 Goals & Objectives Chapter 3: 9 Function of the Plan Chapter 4: 17 Context Statment Chapter 5: 31 Historic Resources Survey Chapter 6: 33 Architectural Styles Chapter 7 63 Residential Rehabilitation Chapter 8: 79 Residential Additions Chapter 9: 83 Residential In-fi ll Chapter 10: 93 Public Realm Chapter 11: 97 Defi nitions Appendices 3 4 Preservation Plan Chapter 1 Mission Statement he principal purpose of the Preservation Plan is to maintain, Tenhance and preserve the historic integrity, sense of place and aesthetic appearance of the three HPOZs and to preserve for future generations their historic architectural character and integrity. The HPOZs and Preservation Plan shall accomplish these by: Providing clear preservation guidelines for restoration and • rehabilitation of structures; Preventing commercial encroachment and preserving the • residential character of the neighborhoods; Preventing teardowns and demolition of contributing • structures; Ensuring that the height, bulk, massing, lot coverage and • architectural designs of both additions and infi ll development are compatible with the historic fabric of the neighborhoods; Providing residents pertinent information about historic • preservation philosophy, resources and opportunities; Encouraging residents to participate in the preservation • process; Fostering neighborhood pride among residents and property • owners;
    [Show full text]
  • City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
    City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin Architectural and Historical Intensive Survey Report of Residential Properties Phase 2 By Rowan Davidson, Associate AIA & Jennifer L. Lehrke, AIA, NCARB Legacy Architecture, Inc. 605 Erie Avenue, Suite 101 Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081 Project Director Joseph R. DeRose, Survey & Registration Historian Wisconsin Historical Society Division of Historic Preservation – Public History 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Sponsoring Agency Wisconsin Historical Society Division of Historic Preservation – Public History 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 2019-2020 Acknowledgments This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to Office of the Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240. The activity that is the subject of this intensive survey report has been financed entirely with Federal Funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and administered by the Wisconsin Historical Society. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Styles of Residential Architecture in Rochester
    Styles of Rochester's Residential Architecture1 Knowing the age and style of your house and learning about the period when it was constructed will enable you to make better maintenance, repair, and rehab decisions. Ideally, we want to enhance the appearance of our homes in a way that will increase their value, complement our neighborhoods, and retain the historic integrity of the properties. Whether a house is simple and unadorned or replete with Queen Anne detailing, its design and the elements that comprise this design were carefully chosen to conform to styles that often developed over decades and even centuries. It is important to understand your house well enough to avoid compromising the design with inappropriate additions, subtractions, or repairs. Your house might not easily fall within any of the following categories, or it might have details from two or more architectural periods. Don't worry if you can't place it in a particular slot; some houses simply cannot be identified by a particular style. It's perfectly acceptable, and sometimes preferable, to describe your house by its layout and details and forget about the style. 1 The information on styles comes from Rehab Rochester: A Sensible Guide for Old- House Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation, published by the Landmark Society of Western New York with support of the City of Rochester, and available in full text at www.landmarksociety.org. City of Rochester, NY Preservation Guidelines 2005 A.1 Residential Architectural Styles Federal (1780s-1820s) This style, found in only a handful of houses in Characteristic features include: the city of Rochester, was inspired by English interpretations of classical motifs.
    [Show full text]
  • An Architectural and Historical Analysis of the Caretaker's House at the Winneshiek County Poor Farm, Decorah Township, Winneshiek County, Iowa
    AN ARCHITECTURAL AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CARETAKER’S HOUSE AT THE WINNESHIEK COUNTY POOR FARM, DECORAH TOWNSHIP, WINNESHIEK COUNTY, IOWA Section 14, T98N, R8W Special Report 1 Prepared for Winneshiek County Historic Preservation Commission Courthouse Annex 204 West Broadway Decorah, Iowa 52101 Prepared by Branden K. Scott With contributions by Lloyd Bolz, Derek V. Lee, and David G. Stanley Bear Creek Archeology, Inc. P.O. Box 347 Cresco, Iowa 52136 David G. Stanley, Director February 2012 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report presents the findings of an investigation concerning the Winneshiek County Poor Farm (96-00658), and more specifically the Caretaker’s House (96-00644) within the county farm district. This investigation was prepared for the Winneshiek County Historic Preservation Commission because the Caretaker’s House, a structure potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A is to be dismantled. This investigation seeks to document the architectural aspects of the property with emphasis on the Caretaker’s House, create a historical and cultural context of the farm, determine the potential significance of the property and each of its contributing/non- contributing features, and provide data necessary for future considerations of the property. This document was prepared by Bear Creek Archeology, Inc. of Cresco, Iowa, and any opinions expressed herein represent the views of the primary author. This report documents the Winneshiek County Poor Farm (96-00658) as a historic district containing three distinct buildings and three associated structures. The district consists of the newly constructed (relatively speaking) Wellington Place care facility (96-00660), the Winneshiek County Poor House (96-00659), the Caretaker’s House (96-00644), two sheds, and a picnic shelter, all of which are settled upon 2.7 ha (6.6 ac) on the west side of Freeport, Iowa.
    [Show full text]
  • Teori Arsitektur 03
    •Victorian architecture 1837 and 1901 UK •Neolithic architecture 10,000 BC-3000 BC •Jacobethan 1838 •Sumerian architecture 5300 BC-2000 BC •Carpenter Gothic USA and Canada 1840s on •Soft Portuguese style 1940-1955 Portugal & colonies •Ancient Egyptian architecture 3000 BC-373 AD •Queenslander (architecture) 1840s–1960s •Ranch-style 1940s-1970s USA •Classical architecture 600 BC-323 AD Australian architectural styles •New towns 1946-1968 United Kingdom Ancient Greek architecture 776 BC-265 BC •Romanesque Revival architecture 1840–1900 USA •Mid-century modern 1950s California, etc. Roman architecture 753 BC–663 AD •Neo-Manueline 1840s-1910s Portugal & Brazil •Florida Modern 1950s or Tropical Modern •Architecture of Armenia (IVe s - XVIe s) •Neo-Grec 1848 and 1865 •Googie architecture 1950s USA •Merovingian architecture 400s-700s France and Germany •Adirondack Architecture 1850s New York, USA •Brutalist architecture 1950s–1970s •Anglo-Saxon architecture 450s-1066 England and Wales •Bristol Byzantine 1850-1880 •Structuralism 1950s-1970s •Byzantine architecture 527 (Sofia)-1520 •Second Empire 1865 and 1880 •Metabolist Movement 1959 Japan •Islamic Architecture 691-present •Queen Anne Style architecture 1870–1910s England & USA •Arcology 1970s-present •Carolingian architecture 780s-800s France and Germany Stick Style 1879-1905 New England •Repoblación architecture 880s-1000s Spain •Structural Expressionism 1980s-present Eastlake Style 1879-1905 New England •Ottonian architecture 950s-1050s Germany Shingle Style 1879-1905 New England •Postmodern architecture 1980s •Russian architecture 989-1700s •National Park Service Rustic 1872–present USA •Romanesque architecture 1050-1100 •Deconstructivism 1982–present •Chicago school (architecture) 1880s and 1890 USA •Norman architecture 1074-1250 •Memphis Group 1981-1988 •Neo-Byzantine architecture 1882–1920s American •Blobitecture 2003–present •Gothic architecture •Art Nouveau/Jugendstil c.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Notable Structures & Preservation
    2021 Notable Structures & Preservation Opportunities Grover St. Residence 409 Grover St. Constructed circa 1907, this two-and-a-half story Colonial Revival features a stone foundation, wood exterior walls, and a hipped roof. The façade features a mutli-light door, a square multi-light stained glass window, and one-over-one double-hung wood window. A recessed porch covers the entry, and it features two Doric columns, wood decking, and cornice with dentil trim. The second-story features two original one-over-one double-hung wood windows. The second-story wood siding features a smaller exposure than the first story which continues around the building. The cornice features dentil trim. There is an off-centered gable dormer with an original two-light window. Both elevations feature original one-over-one double-hung wood windows with and without the aluminum awnings. The side elevations feature a two-story projecting rectangular bay towards the rear. Suddath House 410 Grover St. The Queen Anne was popularized in England by 19th century architects such as Richard Norman Shaw, in which they used Medieval precedents for the popular style. The house style became popular in the United States due to its published plans in pattern books, architectural manuals, and mail-order house plans. This architectural style featured numerous ornamentation and details to the exterior, especially to avoid smooth-walls. Architects and designers incorporated pattern wall claddings, projecting bay windows, and oriels. One-story partial-width or wraparound porches were common features to accentuate the asymmetrical façade. Porch ornamentation varied from spindle work, classical detailing, and brackets.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture on Mackinac Island Native American French Rustic Military Federalist Colonial Victorian Era Greek Revival Gothic Re
    Islamic thought and architecture came to Europe via Italianate, Second Empire, Romanesque and Queen the crusades during the medieval era. Instead of using Anne are all Victorian era styles. Early buildings include ArchitectureWith few exceptions, on Mackinac Mackinac Island’s Island building are wood for military fortifications, the Islamic architects the Island House Hotel and Lake View Hotel. Stick style constructed of wood and at least eleven are built of logs, used stone or brick made from local materials in order may be found gracing Bay View Bed & Breakfast and most with clapboard siding. There is also a history of to withstand fire. The French and Spanish crusaders many cottages on the East Bluff while Queen Anne style building over existing buildings as well as moving build- brought this idea to the west after their military holds sway at the cottage Brigadoon and on the West ings around on the Island which lends to each buildings campaigns through the Islamic world. Fort Mackinac’s Bluff. history of place. Styles found on Mackinac Island span walls reflect this influence. At the highest point on the three centuries and include Native American, French Island, the Island’s second military post, Fort Holmes Rustic, Military, Colonial, Victorian, Carpenter Gothic, reflects British Military architecture as it is completely GreekArchitectural Revival features include a gable, front wings, Greek Revival, Colonial Revival, Classical Revival, made of wood and as a result has burned and been full height classical portico and eared architraves. Ste Shingle Style, Arts & Craft and American Foursquare. rebuilt several times. Anne’s Church Rectory, Harbour View Inn and Haan’s 1830 Inn are excellent examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptions of Important Historic Sites
    Appendix A DESCRIPTIONS OF IMPORTANT HISTORIC SITES This list of some of the most important historic sites or properties (buildings, structures, and districts), within the proposed Santa Cruz Valley National Heritage Area includes: (1) all National Historic Landmarks; (2) selected properties currently listed on the National and State Registers of Historic Places; (3) selected properties that are unlisted but are likely eligible for inclusion in the National and State Registers; and (4) selected properties with local significance. The properties in Pima County were identified in 2002 as Priority Historic Sites for the cultural resources element of the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan (Pima County 2002). The properties in Santa Cruz County were identified in a 2004 inventory conducted for this Feasibility Study by the University of Arizona Preservation Studies Program. This combined list does not include every property currently listed on the National and State Registers. It is a small sample of the historic properties with national, state, and local significance in this region, and it can be expanded in the future. 10 COTTAGES ON SHORT STREET, NRHP Short Street Nogales (Early 1900s) These 10 concrete cottages were built as modest worker’s housing early in the twentieth century. They are significant to the Nogales area because they are the only examples of cast-in-place concrete construction in the residential sector. They are uniquely situated on a hillside, with a central stairway access servicing the units. The cottages feature exposed rafters and corrugated steel sheathed gabled roofs. (Andrew Gorski) 1ST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 915 East Fourth Street Tucson (1929, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Glossary of Terms A
    EGGHEAD PUBLISHERS, LLC. © 2015 Except as permitted under the copyright Act of 1976, this glossary may not be reproduced in whole or part, in any manner. Real Estate Glossary of Terms A A ABANDONMENT. The act of voluntarily relinquishing or surrendering possession of real property, without the transfer of title to someone else. ABANDONMENT OF EASEMENT. The obvious and intentional surrender of an easement. ABANDONMENT OF HOMESTEAD. A legal document that proves a homestead was abandoned. In order to obtain a homestead on a new property, the owner must file an abandonment of homestead on the old property. ABATEMENT. A decrease or reduction in worth or amount (usually applies to taxes or rent). ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE. Extinction or termination of a nuisance. ABLE. Refers to financial ability; as in ready, willing, and able buyer. ABOVE GRADE IMPROVEMENTS. Improvements built above the ground level. ABROGATION. The rescission, revocation, or annulling of a contract by mutual consent of the parties to the contract, or for cause by either party to the contract. ABSENTEE OWNER. A property owner who does not live on the property, and who may rely on a property manager to manage or oversee its maintenance. ABSOLUTE NET LEASE. Lease requiring the tenant to pay for all the expenses of operating and maintaining the property, including capital expenditures and major repairs. ABSOLUTE OWNERSHIP. The greatest interest that one can have in real property. An estate that is unqualified, of indefinite duration, freely transferable and inheritable. Also known as Fee Simple Estate. ABSORPTION ANALYSIS. A study of the number of units of residential or non- residential property that can be sold or leased over a given period of time in a defined location.
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Associated Database Will Become a Planning and Management Tool for the City of Tucson’S Historic Preservation Office
    7XFVRQ'DLO\&LWL]HQ 7XFVRQ$UL]RQD 7XFVRQ'DLO\&LWL]HQ 7XFVRQ$UL]RQD POST-WORLD WAR II RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT in TUCSON, ARIZONA 1945-1975 National Register of Historic Places Eligibility Assessment prepared by: J. Chris Evans, Architect Modern Architecture Preservation Project Jennifer M. Levstik City of Tucson Historic Preservation Office R. Brooks Jeffery, Professor University of Arizona Heritage Conservation Program 2016 KWWSLQWHUDFWLYHDQFHVWU\FRP3ULQW1HZV$578B'$B&,BB"ODQGVFDSH IDOVH VRXUFH3ODFHPHQW TXHU\ EDFNXUO'KWWS« KWWSLQWHUDFWLYHDQFHVWU\FRP3ULQW1HZV$578B'$B&,BB"ODQGVFDSH IDOVH VRXUFH3ODFHPHQW TXHU\ EDFNXUO'KWWS« Post-World War II Residential Subdivision Development in Tucson 1945-1975 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was funded in part by a Certified Local Government Historic Preservation Grant issued through the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office. Funding was also provided by the Drachman Institute, the community-based research and outreach arm of the University of Arizona’s College of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture. Additional resources and support were provided by the City of Tucson’s Historic Preservation Office. 2 Post-World War II Residential Subdivision Development in Tucson 1945-1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 Methodology 4 Context: “The Evolution of Post-World War II Subdivision Design and 11 Development in Tucson, Arizona 1945-1975” Results and Recommendations 27 Priority Subdivisions 30 Maps 48 Bibliography 53 Appendix 56 3 Post-World War II Residential Subdivision Development in Tucson 1945-1975 INTRODUCTION In 2012, the City of Tucson’s Historic Preservation Office--in partnership with architect Chris Evans and the University of Arizona’s Heritage Conservation Program--embarked on a three- year project to address the preservation issues surrounding the hundreds of single-family residential subdivisions built in Tucson during the mid-20th century.
    [Show full text]